Action of natural selection in lines of Drosophila selected for a new level of canalization

Summary Four lines of Drosophila melanogaster previously selected for a stabilized phenotype of two extra dorsocentral bristles were examined for 20 generations of canalizing selection and relaxation of selection. A substantial frequency of flies with either two anterior or two posterior extra bristles was maintained in the relaxed lines. These patterns were the only ones tolerated by natural selection, i.e., the only symmetric ones. It was concluded that anterior and posterior dorsocentral bristles are two independent development structures, and the results are discussed in relation to two proposed genetic systems for bristle determination.     

Selection for canalization at extra dorsocentral and scutellar bristles in Drosophila melanogaster.

Direct artificial selection for a specific pattern, in the number and position of extra bristles, was carried out in a wild-type population of Drosophila melanogaster to canalize (estimated by probit width) the selected phenotypes. From the same population, independent lines were selected for extra dorsocentral bristles (lines D3 and D4) and for extra scutellar bristles (lines E2, E3, and E4). Differences at canalization between both dorsocentral and scutellar systems were detected. Results fit an independent control hypothesis for canalization, at two symmetrical extra bristles, in the main regions in which extra bristles appear.     

Canalization at two extra scutellar bristles: artificial selection, chromosome analysis, and effect of temperature.

Two isofemale lines (P1 and P2) from a wild-type population of Drosophila melanogaster were selected for an invariant phenotype, two symmetrical and anterior scutellar extra bristles. Both P1 and P2 lines responded quickly to direct selection for two extra bristles, but although this phenotype was canalized in the P2 line, it was not in the P1 line. This lack of canalization at two extra bristles, measured by probit width, is the first reported in the literature. Analysis of chromosomal contribution showed the P1 decanalized phenotype to be due to chromosome 2. Synthetic chromosomal combinations were tested at four development temperatures (17 degrees, 21 degrees, 24 degrees, and 30 degrees C), and no correlation was observed between canalization at two extra bristles measured by probit width and minimum phenotypic change due to different temperatures. In this test, development at the highest temperatures was accompanied by an increased tendency to return to the wild phenotype in the canalized phenotypes only, suggesting that this drastic change could be accounted for by the action of the wild-type canalizing system. Decanalized genotypes, or those canalizing at phenotypes other than the wild type, could be explained by mutations which, to a greater or lesser degree, alter the normal genetic system of canalization.     

Selection for a Threshold Character in Drosophila IV. Chromosomal Analyses of Plateaued Populations

Chromosome substitution and intra-chromosomal recombination techniques have been employed to determine the genetic basis of limits to selection in lines selected for high scutellar bristle number from the Canberra population. Three observations indicate the presence of an upper threshold affecting some component traits, which is not readily discernible at the level of the selected phenotype:(1) The variance of the number of anterior + interstitial + posterior bristles is progressively reduced as the mean approaches a total of eight at these sites. Total bristle number, which includes apicals in addition to the above three components, and which was the trait subject to selection, shows little evidence of this phenomenon;(2) the effect of a given chromosome substitution is also greatly reduced as the mean approaches eight anterior + interstitial + posterior bristles, by comparison with its effect in genotypes of lower mean;(3) chromosome substitutions show some evidence of negative interaction as this level is approached, in contrast to the positive interactions evident at higher means. All chromosomes except IV are involved in progress beyond the proposed upper threshold. However, chromosome III has the most important effect, due primarily to a major gene located at approximately 61 cM, which also markedly increases dorsocentral and postvertical bristle numbers.     

Studies on the Scutellar Bristles of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. II. Long-Term Selection for High Bristle Number in the Oregon Rc Strain and Correlated Responses in Abdominal Chaetae

Results are presented of 135 generations of selection for high scutellar bristle number in two lines M and M3 derived from the same original mating of one female with 5 bristles by one male with 4 bristles, the latter being the wild-type canalised phenotype. Results are also given of two relaxed lines per line and of a reselection line M2 derived from the first relaxed line of line M which had regressed almost to base population level. The effect of introducing the sc(1) allele into the M and M3 selected backgrounds was studied at generations 39-44. At the end of selection the effect of an extra dose of sc(+) was also studied in males of all selected backgrounds. The correlated responses in abdominal bristles were followed in all lines.-Considering their common origin, the selection lines differed markedly in pattern of scutellar response and in most other aspects observed, namely correlated responses in abdominals and p.c. scutellars, sex differences, and behaviour on relaxation. Selection limits for scutellar bristles in lines M and M2 were equal to or greater than the most extreme reported in the literature.-The probit span of the canalised 4 bristle class decreased in each selection line as the mean scutellar bristle number increased, and increased again in the relaxed lines as the mean bristle number decreased. In the context of an hypothesis that canalisation at 4 bristle is due to regulation of the scute locus, this result is now interpreted as being due mainly to selection for poor regulators of sc(+), in contrast to a previous interpretation that only the minor gene background was altered by selection, the canalisation (regulation) genotype not being affected.-Introducing the sc(1) allele into the selected backgrounds M and M3 showed a reduced effect on sc(1) flies compared with sc(+) flies, and an interaction of sc(1) and sc(+) with selected background. sc(1) flies had about the same number of bristles in both backgrounds though the mean of sc(+) flies in line M was about 3sigma higher than in line M3. Dominance of sc(+) to sc(1) was reduced slightly in M3. However, the effect of an extra dose of sc(+) at the end of selection was about the same as in unselected in all lines, so the first or dominance level of regulation of the scute locus was not significantly affected by selection, though the second or canalisation level of regulation was.-A large positive correlated response in abdominal bristles occurred in all lines. The response in line M was about twice that in M2 and M3 and was in fact as large as can be obtained from direct selection on abdominals. In line M some genes may have been selected with a proportionately greater effect on abdominals than on scutellars. This is supported by the further observation in line M that the abdominal scores of flies with particular scutellar bristles scores increased as the scutellar mean increased. An attempt was made to apply to these results Rendel's (1962) model of competition between scutellars and abdominals for common bristle-making resources. This could not be done satisfactorily mainly because the assumptions in the model about the similarity of effects in scute and wild-type flies were not met in the present material.     

Mesosternal bristle number in a cosmopolitan drosophilid: an X-linked variable trait independent of sternopleural bristles

Mesosternal (MS) bristles in Drosophila are a pair of machrochaetae found at the sternal end of the sternopleural (STP) microchaetae, and are thought to be invariable. In a closely related drosophilid genus, Zaprionus, their number is four and, in contrast to Drosophila, they show interspecific and intraspecific variability. The genetic basis of MS bristle number variability was studied in Z. indianus, the only cosmopolitan species of the genus. The trait responded rapidly to selection and two lines were obtained, one lacking any bristles (0-0) and the other bearing the normal phenotype (2-2). Other symmetrical phenotypes, (1-1) and (3-3), could also be selected for, but with lesser success. By contrast, STP bristle number did not vary significantly between the two lines (0-0) and (2-2), revealing its genetic independence from MS bristle number. Reciprocal crosses between these two lines showed that MS bristle number is mainly influenced by a major gene on the X chromosome (i.e. F₁ males always resembled their mothers) with codominant expression (i.e. heterozygous F₁ females harboured an average phenotype of 2 bristles). However, trait penetrance was incomplete and backcrosses revealed that this variability was partly due to genetic modifiers, most likely autosomal. The canalization of MS bristle number was investigated under different temperatures, and the increased appearance of abnormal phenotypes mainly occurred at extreme temperatures. There was a bias, however, towards bristle loss, as shown by a liability (developmental map) analysis. Finally, when ancestral and introduced populations were compared, the latter were far less stable, suggesting that genetic bottlenecks may perturb the MS bristle number canalization system. MS bristle number, thus, appears to be an excellent model for investigating developmental canalization at both the quantitative and the molecular level.     

Selection and temperature effects on extra dorsocentral bristles inDrosophila melanogaster

Starting from base populations which showed a tendency to form supernumerary dorsocentral bristles, selection for high numbers of dorsocentrals was carried out. In all, 9 lines were selected 6 to 14 generations. Selection proved to be effective in all but two lines. Selection for reduced numbers in one of the lines also proved effective.Mean values of over 10 were reached in the females of certain high lines. Average counts in males were always lower than those of females. This sex difference is not a consequence of the difference in size between the sexes.The base populations were of mutant stock origin, and some of them segregated for mutant genes which proved to be correlated with extrabristle phenotype. Supernumerary bristles were not distributed in the same manner in all of the selection lines, nor was the reaction of phenotypic expression to temperature the same in various lines.     

Chromosomal polymorphism and extra bristles of Drosophila melanogaster: joint variation under selection in isofemale lines

Selection for increased numbers of dorsocentral and scutellar bristles produced an increase of In(3R)C heterozygotes in isofemale lines of D. melanogaster. The influence of polygenic selection in the maintenance of the chromosomal polymorphism is discussed.     

Selection for six scutellar chaetae in Drosophila melanogaster

Summary 1. From a base population showing some flies with more than the normal 4 scutellar chaeta phenotype directional selection was carried out and lead to a line with many flies having 6 chaetae. 2. Selection was then practised for 6 chaetae such that the extra 2 chaetae were in the anterior left and anterior right positions on the scutellum. This lead to a line with most flies having this chaeta number and pattern, therefore showing some canalization. 3. Additive genetic activity controlling the increased chaeta number was found on all the 3 major chromosomes.     

A POPULATION GENETIC THEORY OF CANALIZATION

Canalization is the suppression of phenotypic variation. Depending on the causes of phenotypic variation, one speaks either of genetic or environmental canalization. Genetic canalization describes insensitivity of a character to mutations, and the insensitivity to environmental factors is called environmental canalization. Genetic canalization is of interest because it influences the availability of heritable phenotypic variation to natural selection, and is thus potentially important in determining the pattern of phenotypic evolution. In this paper a number of population genetic models are considered of a quantitative character under stabilizing selection. The main purpose of this study is to define the population genetic conditions and constraints for the evolution of canalization. Environmental canalization is modeled as genotype specific environmental variance. It is shown that stabilizing selection favors genes that decrease environmental variance of quantitative characters. However, the theoretical limit of zero environmental variance has never been observed. Of the many ways to explain this fact, two are addressed by our model. It is shown that a “canalization limit” is reached if canalizing effects of mutations are correlated with direct effects on the same character. This canalization limit is predicted to be independent of the strength of stabilizing selection, which is inconsistent with recent experimental data (Sterns et al. 1995). The second model assumes that the canalizing genes have deleterious pleiotropic effects. If these deleterious effects are of the same magnitude as all the other mutations affecting fitness very strong stabilizing selection is required to allow the evolution of environmental canalization. Genetic canalization is modeled as an influence on the average effect of mutations at a locus of other genes. It is found that the selection for genetic canalization critically depends on the amount of genetic variation present in the population. The more genetic variation, the stronger the selection for canalizing effects. All factors that increase genetic variation favor the evolution of genetic canalization (large population size, high mutation rate, large number of genes). If genetic variation is maintained by mutation-selection balance, strong stabilizing selection can inhibit the evolution of genetic canalization. Strong stabilizing selection eliminates genetic variation to a level where selection for canalization does not work anymore. It is predicted that the most important characters (in terms of fitness) are not necessarily the most canalized ones, if they are under very strong stabilizing selection (k > 0.2V_e). The rate of decrease of mutational variance V_m is found to be less than 10% of the initial V_m. From this result it is concluded that characters with typical mutational variances of about 10^–3 V_e are in a metastable state where further evolution of genetic canalization is too slow to be of importance at a microevolutionary time scale. The implications for the explanation of macroevolutionary patterns are discussed.     

The Evolution of Canalization and Evolvability in Stable and Fluctuating Environments

Using a multilinear model of epistasis we explore the evolution of canalization (reduced mutational effects) and evolvability (levels of additive genetic variance) under different forms of stabilizing and fluctuating selection. We show that the total selection acting on an allele can be divided into a component deriving from adaptation of the trait mean, a component of canalizing selection favoring alleles that epistatically reduce the effects of other allele substitutions, and a component of conservative selection disfavoring rare alleles. While canalizing selection operates in both stable and fluctuating environments, it may not typically maximize canalization, because it gets less efficient with increasing canalization, and reaches a balance with drift, mutation and indirect selection. Fluctuating selection leads to less canalized equilibria than stabilizing selection of comparable strength, because canalization then becomes influenced by erratic correlated responses to shifting trait adaptation. We conclude that epistatic systems under bounded fluctuating selection will become less canalized than under stabilizing selection and may support moderately increased evolvability if the amplitude of fluctuations is large, but canalization is still stronger and evolvability lower than expected under neutral evolution or under patterns of selection that shift the trait in directions of positive (reinforcing) epistasis.     

Is There a Gene Regulating the Scute Locus on the Third Chromosome of D. MELANOGASTER?

A section of the third chromosome of D. melanogaster some 25 to 40 centimorgans long including sr was transferred from a wild-type stock selected by Latter for high scutellar bristle number into a scute stock with a large number of scutellar bristles. This segment is shown to have a large effect on the bristle numbers of wild-type flies, to reduce the strength of canalization of the scute phenotype at 4 bristles, to have little, if any, effect on bristle numbers of scute flies with less than 4 bristles but to increase the number of flies with 5 and 6 scutellar bristles in scute stocks that normally have a large number of flies with 4 bristles. It is suggested that this segment in unselected chromosomes contains a gene that regulates bristle number by repressing the scute locus and that Latter has selected a mutant of the regulator which fails to repress the action of the scute locus.     

Analysis of lethals in selected lines of Drosophila melanogaster

Summary Five lines of Drosophila melanogaster that reached an extreme phenotype after long-term selection for increased dorsocentral bristle number, were analysed for the presence of lethals. Seven chromosome II and three chromosome III lethal types were detected in four of the lines, at frequencies ranging from between 6% and 36%. No lethal had any demonstrable effect over the selected trait. In one line, where almost every chromosome II was a lethal carrier, it was shown that the main lethal (at a frequency of 36%) was associated with the transmission ratio distortion in males. The processes which could lead to the accumulation of this lethal and others linked in disequilibrium to it is discussed. Some results suggest similar mechanisms for the accumulation of lethals in the other lines. These findings show that causes other than the direct effect of artificial selection must be taken into account when trying to explain the accumulation of lethals in selected lines.     

Polygenic Mutation in Drosophila Melanogaster: Genetic Analysis of Selection Lines

We have conducted genetic analyses of 12 long-term selection lines of Drosophila melanogaster derived from a highly inbred base population, containing new mutations affecting abdominal and sternopleural bristle number. Biometric analysis of the number of effective factors differentiating the selected lines from the base inbred indicated that with the exception of the three lines selected for increased number of abdominal bristles, three or more mutations contributed to the responses of the selection lines. Analysis of the chromosomal distribution of effects revealed that mutations affecting abdominal bristle number occurred on all three major chromosomes. In addition, Y-linked mutations with effects ranging from one to three bristles occurred in all three lines selected for decreased number of abdominal bristles, as well as in one line selected for increased abdominal bristle number. Mutations affecting sternopleural bristle number were mainly on the X and third chromosomes. One abdominal and one sternopleural selection line showed evidence of a segregating lethal with large effects on bristle number. As an indirect test for allelism of mutations occurring in different selection lines, the three lines selected in the same direction for the same trait were crossed in all possible combinations, and selection continued from the F(2) hybrids. Responses of the hybrid lines usually did not exceed those of the most extreme parental lines, indicating that the responses of the parental lines may have been partly due to mutations at the same loci, although other interpretations are possible.     

The evolution of genetic canalization under fluctuating selection

Abstract.— If the direction of selection changes from generation to generation, the ability to respond to selection is maladaptive: the response to selection in one generation leads to reduced fitness in the next. Because the response is determined by the amount of genetic variance expressed at the phenotypic level, rapidly fluctuating selection should favor modifier genes that reduce the phenotypic effect of alleles segregating at structural loci underlying the trait. Such reduction in phenotypic expression of genetic variation has been named "genetic canalization." I support this argument with a series of two- and multilocus models with alternating linear selection and Gaussian selection with fluctuating optimum. A canalizing modifier gene affects the fitness of its carriers in three ways: (1) it reduces the phenotypic consequences of genetic response to previous selection; (2) it reduces the genetic response to selection, which is manifested as linkage disequilibrium between the modifier and structural loci; and (3) it reduces the phenotypic variance. The first two effects reduce fitness under directional selection sustained for several generations, but improve fitness when the direction of selection has just been reversed. The net effect tends to favor a canalizing modifier under rapidly fluctuating selection regimes (period of eight generations or less). The third effect improves fitness of the modifier allele if the fitness function is convex and reduces it if the function is concave. Under fluctuating Gaussian selection, the population is more likely to experience the concave portion of the fitness function when selection is stronger. Therefore, only weak to moderately strong fluctuating Gaussian selection favors genetic canalization. This paper considerably broadens the conditions that favor genetic canalization, which so far has only been postulated to evolve under long-term stabilizing selection.     

Shaggy (zeste-white 3) and the formation of supernumerary bristle precursors in the developing wing blade of Drosophila.

The development of supernumerary bristle precursors induced by the mutation shaggy (sgg; also known as zeste-white 3) was examined in the developing wing blade of imaginal and pupal Drosophila. sgg clones were induced by mitotic recombination; clones were marked using enhancer-trap flies which express beta-galactosidase ubiquitously in imaginal tissues, while bristle precursors were identified using sensillum and bristle-specific enhancer-trap lines. It was shown that the precursors of supernumerary sgg bristles in the wing blade mimicked the development of morphologically similar margin bristles, developing in a manner similar to that of anterior sensory bristles in anterior clones and posterior noninnervated bristles in posterior clones. Interestingly, supernumerary anterior sensory bristles appeared outside the normal regions of "proneural" gene activity as identified using anti-achaete. Moreover, sgg could induce the ectopic expression of achaete in anterior clones. Thus, in the anterior wing blade the sgg mutation leads to the formation of ectopic proneural regions.     

The evolutionary genetics of canalization

Evolutionary genetics has recently made enormous progress in understanding how genetic variation maps into phenotypic variation. However why some traits are phenotypically invariant despite apparent genetic and environmental changes has remained a major puzzle. In the 1940s, Conrad Hal Waddington coined the concept and term "canalization" to describe the robustness of phenotypes to perturbation; a similar concept was proposed by Waddington's contemporary Ivan Ivanovich Schmalhausen. This paper reviews what has been learned about canalization since Waddington. Canalization implies that a genotype's phenotype remains relatively invariant when individuals of a particular genotype are exposed to different environments (environmental canalization) or when individuals of the same single- or multilocus genotype differ in their genetic background (genetic canalization). Consequently, genetic canalization can be viewed as a particular kind of epistasis, and environmental canalization and phenotypic plasticity are two aspects of the same phenomenon. Canalization results in the accumulation of phenotypically cryptic genetic variation, which can be released after a "decanalizing" event. Thus, canalized genotypes maintain a cryptic potential for expressing particular phenotypes, which are only uncovered under particular decanalizing environmental or genetic conditions. Selection may then act on this newly released genetic variation. The accumulation of cryptic genetic variation by canalization may therefore increase evolvability at the population level by leading to phenotypic diversification under decanalizing conditions. On the other hand, under canalizing conditions, a major part of the segregating genetic variation may remain phenotypically cryptic; canalization may therefore, at least temporarily, constrain phenotypic evolution. Mechanistically, canalization can be understood in terms of transmission patterns, such as epistasis, pleiotropy, and genotype by environment interactions, and in terms of genetic redundancy, modularity, and emergent properties of gene networks and biochemical pathways. While different forms of selection can favor canalization, the requirements for its evolution are typically rather restrictive. Although there are several methods to detect canalization, there are still serious problems with unambiguously demonstrating canalization, particularly its adaptive value.     

Effects of different base populations on selection response in Drosophila

Of two laboratory strains of Drosophila melanogaster used in this study, the +3 strain had slightly higher mean abdominal bristle number and estimated heritability of this character than the Oregon‐R. Their F₁ hybrid exhibited 5 % heterosis. Fourteen generations of the two original strains and the F₃ of the hybrid were selected for high and low numbers of abdominal bristles on the 4th and 5th sternites, at a selection intensity of 20%. A mass‐mated unselected control was maintained for each population. The +3 population responded considerably more to selection for low numbers of bristles than high, and the Oregon‐R population showed a similar, though less marked, tendency; the Crossbred population responded more strongly to selection for high numbers. Except for the Crossbred high selection line, all lines declined in response rate, phenotypic variance, and realised heritability. The average realised heritability of the Oregon‐R and +3 high and low selection lines over 14 selection generations fell short of their predicted base population heritabilities. The deviation from the predicted was particularly pronounced with selection for high bristle number in the +3 line.