Identification of Helical Packing Motifs Common to Bacteriorhodopsin and G Protein-Coupled Receptors

A sequence analysis and comparison of transmembrane helices in bacteriorhodopsin (BR) and G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is presented to identify potential regions of homology across protein families. The results show a common pattern of residues is conserved within the interhelical contact regions of BR that fit a knob-into-hole structural motif previously postulated for globular proteins and photosynthetic reaction centers. Based on an alignment of conserved prolines in transmembrane helices, it is inferred that analogous helix packing arrangements are possible in the rhodopsin-like GPCRs. Molecular models of GPCR helices V and VI indicate these interactions occur between aromatic and hydrophobic residues flanking the highly conserved prolines in these sequences. A similar packing arrangement is shown to occur in the X-ray structure of the melittin which also displays a unique pairing of proline-linked helices. The contact pattern identified is further applied to predict the packing of pairs of proline-containing helices in the pheromone-like and cAMP GPCRs. A potential role in stabilizing structure formation is also suggested for the contacts. The results and conclusions are supported by recent biophysical studies of zinc binding to kappa-opioid receptor mutants.     

Identification of Helical Packing Motifs Common to Bacteriorhodopsin and G Protein-Coupled Receptors

A sequence analysis and comparison of transmembrane helices in bacteriorhodopsin (BR) and G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is presented to identify potential regions of homology across protein families. The results show a common pattern of residues is conserved within the interhelical contact regions of BR that fit a knob-into-hole structural motif previously postulated for globular proteins and photosynthetic reaction centers. Based on an alignment of conserved prolines in transmembrane helices, it is inferred that analogous helix packing arrangements are possible in the rhodopsin-like GPCRs. Molecular models of GPCR helices V and VI indicate these interactions occur between aromatic and hydrophobic residues flanking the highly conserved prolines in these sequences. A similar packing arrangement is shown to occur in the X-ray structure of the melittin which also displays a unique pairing of proline-linked helices. The contact pattern identified is further applied to predict the packing of pairs of proline-containing helices in the pheromone-like and cAMP GPCRs. A potential role in stabilizing structure formation is also suggested for the contacts. The results and conclusions are supported by recent biophysical studies of zinc binding to kappa-opioid receptor mutants.     

A structural model of the acetylcholine receptor channel based on partition energy and helix packing calculations.

A structural model of the transmembrane portion of the acetylcholine receptor was developed from sequences of all its subunits by using transfer energy calculations to locate transmembrane alpha-helices and to calculate which helical side chains should be in contact with water inside the channel, with portions of other transmembrane helices, or with lipid hydrocarbon chains. "Knobs-into-holes" side chain packing calculations were used with other factors to stack the transmembrane alpha-helices together. In the model each subunit has the following structures in order along the sequence from the NH2 terminus: a large extracellular domain of undetermined structure, a short apolar alpha-helix that lies on the extracellular lipid surface of the membrane; three apolar transmembrane alpha-helices (I, II, and III), a cytoplasmic domain of undetermined structure, an amphipathic transmembrane alpha-helix (L) that forms the channel lining, a short extracellular alpha-helix, another apolar transmembrane alpha-helix (IV), and a small cytoplasmic domain formed by the COOH-terminal end of the chain. Three concentric layers form the pore. A bundle of five amphipathic L helices forms the channel lining. This bundle is surrounded by a bundle of 10 alternating II and III helices. Helices I and IV cover portions of the outer surface of the bundle formed by helices II and III. Positions of disulfide bridges are predicted and a mechanism for opening and closing conformational changes is proposed that requires tilting transmembrane helices and possibly a thiol-disulfide interchange reaction.     

Requirement of specific intrahelical interactions for stabilizing the inactive conformation of glycoprotein hormone receptors

Systematic analysis of structural changes induced by activating mutations has been frequently utilized to study activation mechanisms of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). In the thyrotropin receptor and the lutropin receptor (LHR), a large number of naturally occurring mutations leading to constitutive receptor activation were identified. Saturating mutagenesis studies of a highly conserved Asp in the junction of the third intracellular loop and transmembrane domain 6 suggested a participation of this anionic residue in a salt bridge stabilizing the inactive receptor conformation. However, substitution of all conserved cationic residues at the cytoplasmic receptor surface did not support this hypothesis. Asp/Glu residues are a common motif at the N-terminal ends of alpha-helices terminating and stabilizing the helical structure (helix capping). Since Asp/Glu residues in the third intracellular loop/transmembrane domain 6 junction are not only preserved in glycoprotein hormone receptors but also in other GPCRs we speculated that this residue probably participates in an N-terminal helix-capping structure. Poly-Ala stretches are known to form and stabilize alpha-helices. Herein, we show that the function of the highly conserved Asp can be mimicked by poly-Ala substitutions in the LHR and thyrotropin receptor. CD and NMR studies of peptides derived from the juxtamembrane portion of the LHR confirmed the helix extension by the poly-Ala substitution and provided further evidence for an involvement of Asp in a helix-capping structure. Our data implicate that in addition to well established interhelical interactions the inactive conformation of GPCRs is also stabilized by specific intrahelical structures.     

Structural basis of activation of bitter taste receptor T2R1 and comparison with Class A G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs)

The human bitter taste receptors (T2Rs) are non-Class A members of the G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) superfamily, with very limited structural information. Amino acid sequence analysis reveals that most of the important motifs present in the transmembrane helices (TM1-TM7) of the well studied Class A GPCRs are absent in T2Rs, raising fundamental questions regarding the mechanisms of activation and how T2Rs recognize bitter ligands with diverse chemical structures. In this study, the bitter receptor T2R1 was used to systematically investigate the role of 15 transmembrane amino acids in T2Rs, including 13 highly conserved residues, by amino acid replacements guided by molecular modeling. Functional analysis of the mutants by calcium imaging analysis revealed that replacement of Asn-66(2.65) and the highly conserved Asn-24(1.50) resulted in greater than 90% loss of agonist-induced signaling. Our results show that Asn-24(1.50) plays a crucial role in receptor activation by mediating an hydrogen bond network connecting TM1-TM2-TM7, whereas Asn-66(2.65) is essential for binding to the agonist dextromethorphan. The interhelical hydrogen bond between Asn-24(1.50) and Arg-55(2.54) restrains T2R receptor activity because loss of this bond in I27A and R55A mutants results in hyperactive receptor. The conserved amino acids Leu-197(5.50), Ser-200(5.53), and Leu-201(5.54) form a putative LXXSL motif which performs predominantly a structural role by stabilizing the helical conformation of TM5 at the cytoplasmic end. This study provides for the first time mechanistic insights into the roles of the conserved transmembrane residues in T2Rs and allows comparison of the activation mechanisms of T2Rs with the Class A GPCRs.     

Backbone cyclic helix mimetic of chemokine (C–C motif) receptor 2: A rational approach for inhibiting dimerization of G protein-coupled receptors

The transmembrane helical bundle of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) dimerize through helix–helix interactions in response to inflammatory stimulation. A strategy was developed to target the helical dimerization site of GPCRs by peptidomimetics with drug like properties. The concept was demonstrated by selecting a potent backbone cyclic helix mimetic from a library that derived from the dimerization region of chemokine (C–C motif) receptor 2 (CCR2) that is a key player in Multiple Sclerosis. We showed that CCR2 based backbone cyclic peptide having a stable helix structure inhibits specific CCR2-mediated chemotactic migration     

Structure and pH sensitivity of the transmembrane segment 3 of rhodopsin

Activation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) originates in ligand-induced protein conformational changes that are transmitted to the cytosolic receptor surface. In the photoreceptor rhodopsin, and possibly other rhodopsin-like GPCRs, protonation of a carboxylic acid in the conserved E(D)RY motif at the cytosolic end of transmembrane helix 3 (TM3) is coupled to receptor activation. Here, we have investigated the structure of synthetic peptides derived from rhodopsin TM3. Polarized FTIR spectroscopy reveals a helical structure of a 31-mer TM3 peptide reconstituted into PC vesicles with a large tilt of 40-50 degrees of the helical axis relative to the membrane normal. Helical structure is also observed for the TM3 peptide in detergent micelles and depends on pH, especially in the C-terminal sequence. In addition, the fluorescence emission of the single tyrosine of the D(E)RY motif in the TM3 peptide exhibits a pronounced pH sensitivity that is abolished when Glu is replaced by Gln, demonstrating that protonation of the conserved Glu side chain affects the structure in the environment of the D(E)RY motif of TM3. The pH regulation of the C-terminal TM3 structure may be an intrinsic feature of the E(D)RY motif in other class I receptors, allowing the coupling of protonation and conformation of membrane-exposed residues in full-length GPCRs.     

Structure of the integrin alphaIIb transmembrane segment

Integrin cell-adhesion receptors transduce signals bidirectionally across the plasma membrane via the single-pass transmembrane segments of each alpha and beta subunit. While the beta3 transmembrane segment consists of a linear 29-residue alpha-helix, the structure of the alphaIIb transmembrane segment reveals a linear 24-residue alpha-helix (Ile-966 -Lys-989) followed by a backbone reversal that packs Phe-992-Phe-993 against the transmembrane helix. The length of the alphaIIb transmembrane helix implies the absence of a significant transmembrane helix tilt in contrast to its partnering beta3 subunit. Sequence alignment shows Gly-991-Phe-993 to be fully conserved among all 18 human integrin alpha subunits, suggesting that their unusual structural motif is prototypical for integrin alpha subunits. The alphaIIb transmembrane structure demonstrates a level of complexity within the membrane that is beyond simple transmembrane helices and forms the structural basis for assessing the extent of structural and topological rearrangements upon alphaIIb-beta3 association, i.e. integrin transmembrane signaling.     

Structural studies of the putative helix 8 in the human beta(2) adrenergic receptor: an NMR study

The recently reported crystal structure of bovine rhodopsin revealed a cytoplasmic helix (helix 8) in addition to the seven transmembrane helices. This domain is roughly perpendicular to the transmembrane bundle in the presence of an interface and may be a loop-like structure in the absence of an interface. Several studies carried out on this domain suggested that it might act as a conformational switch between the inactive and activated states of this G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR). These results raised the question whether helix 8 may be an important feature of other GPCRs as well. To explore this question, we determined the structure of a peptide representing the putative helix 8 domain in another receptor that belongs to the rhodopsin family of GPCRs, the human beta(2) adrenergic receptor (hbeta(2)AR), using two-dimensional (1)H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). The key results from this structural study are that the putative helix 8 domain is helical in detergent and in DMSO while in water this region is disordered; the conformation is therefore dependent upon the environment. Comparison of data from five GPCRs suggests that these observations may be generally important for GPCR structure and function.     

Common structural requirements for heptahelical domain function in class A and class C G protein-coupled receptors

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are key players in cell communication. Several classes of such receptors have been identified. Although all GPCRs possess a heptahelical domain directly activating G proteins, important structural and sequence differences within receptors from different classes suggested distinct activation mechanisms. Here we show that highly conserved charged residues likely involved in an interaction network between transmembrane domains (TM) 3 and 6 at the cytoplasmic side of class C GPCRs are critical for activation of the gamma-aminobutyric acid type B receptor. Indeed, the loss of function resulting from the mutation of the conserved lysine residue into aspartate or glutamate in the TM3 of gamma-aminobutyric acid type B(2) can be partly rescued by mutating the conserved acidic residue of TM6 into either lysine or arginine. In addition, mutation of the conserved lysine into an acidic residue leads to a nonfunctional receptor that displays a high agonist affinity. This is reminiscent of a similar ionic network that constitutes a lock stabilizing the inactive state of many class A rhodopsin-like GPCRs. These data reveal that despite their original structure, class C GPCRs share with class A receptors at least some common structural feature controlling G protein activation.     

Structure of the conserved HAMP domain in an intact, membrane-bound chemoreceptor: a disulfide mapping study

The HAMP domain is a conserved motif widely distributed in prokaryotic and lower eukaryotic organisms, where it is often found in transmembrane receptors that regulate two-component signaling pathways. The motif links receptor input and output modules and is essential to receptor structure and signal transduction. Recently, a structure was determined for a HAMP domain isolated from an unusual archeal membrane protein of unknown function [Hulko, M., et al. (2006) Cell 126, 929-940]. This study uses cysteine and disulfide chemistry to test this archeal HAMP model in the full-length, membrane-bound aspartate receptor of bacterial chemotaxis. The chemical reactivities of engineered Cys residues scanned throughout the aspartate receptor HAMP region are highly correlated with the degrees of solvent exposure of corresponding positions in the archeal HAMP structure. Both domains are homodimeric, and the individual subunits of both domains share the same helix-connector-helix organization with the same helical packing faces. Moreover, disulfide mapping reveals that the four helices of the aspartate receptor HAMP domain are arranged in the same parallel, four-helix bundle architecture observed in the archeal HAMP structure. One detectable difference is the packing of the extended connector between helices, which is not conserved. Finally, activity studies of the aspartate receptor indicate that contacts between HAMP helices 1 and 2' at the subunit interface play a critical role in modulating receptor on-off switching. Disulfide bonds linking this interface trap the receptor in its kinase-activating on-state, or its kinase inactivating off-state, depending on their location. Overall, the evidence suggests that the archeal HAMP structure accurately depicts the architecture of the conserved HAMP motif in transmembrane chemoreceptors. Both the on- and off-states of the aspartate receptor HAMP domain closely resemble the archeal HAMP structure, and only a small structural rearrangement occurs upon on-off switching. A model incorporating HAMP into the full receptor structure is proposed.     

Beta2 adrenergic receptor activation. Modulation of the proline kink in transmembrane 6 by a rotamer toggle switch

In many rhodopsin-like G-protein-coupled receptors, agonist binding to a cluster of aromatic residues in TM6 may promote receptor activation by altering the configuration of the TM6 Pro-kink and by the subsequent movement of the cytoplasmic end of TM6 away from TM3. We hypothesized that the highly conserved Cys(6.47), in the vicinity of the conserved Pro(6.50), modulates the configuration of the aromatic cluster and the TM6 Pro-kink through specific interactions in its different rotamer configurations. In the beta(2) adrenergic receptor, mutation of Cys(6.47) to Thr, which in an alpha-helix has a different rotamer distribution from Cys and Ser, produced a constitutively active receptor, whereas the Ser mutant was similar to wild-type receptor. Use of the biased Monte Carlo technique of Conformational Memories showed that the rotamer changes among Cys/Ser/Thr(6.47), Trp(6.48), and Phe(6.52) are highly correlated, representing a rotamer "toggle switch" that may modulate the TM6 Pro-kink. Differential modulation of the accessibility of Cys(6.47) and an engineered Cys(6.52) in wild type and a constitutively active background provides experimental support for the association of this rotamer switch with receptor activation.     

Conserved activation pathways in G-protein-coupled receptors

GPCRs (G-protein-coupled receptors) are seven-transmembrane helix proteins that transduce exogenous and endogenous signals to modulate the activity of downstream effectors inside the cell. Despite the relevance of these proteins in human physiology and pharmaceutical research, we only recently started to understand the structural basis of their activation mechanism. In the period 2008-2011, nine active-like structures of GPCRs were solved. Among them, we have determined the structure of light-activated rhodopsin with all the features of the active metarhodopsin-II, which represents so far the most native-like model of an active GPCR. This structure, together with the structures of other inactive, intermediate and active states of rhodopsin constitutes a unique structural framework on which to understand the conserved aspects of the activation mechanism of GPCRs. This mechanism can be summarized as follows: retinal isomerization triggers a series of local structural changes in the binding site that are amplified into three intramolecular activation pathways through TM (transmembrane helix) 5/TM3, TM6 and TM7/TM2. Sequence analysis strongly suggests that these pathways are conserved in other GPCRs. Differential activation of these pathways by ligands could be translated into the stabilization of different active states of the receptor with specific signalling properties.     

G protein-coupled receptors of class A harness the energy of membrane potential to increase their sensitivity and selectivity

The human genome contains about 700 genes of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) of class A; these seven-helical membrane proteins are the targets of almost half of all known drugs. In the middle of the helix bundle, crystal structures reveal a highly conserved sodium-binding site, which is connected with the extracellular side by a water-filled tunnel. This binding site contains a sodium ion in those GPCRs that are crystallized in their inactive conformations but does not in those GPCRs that are trapped in agonist-bound active conformations. The escape route of the sodium ion upon the inactive-to-active transition and its very direction have until now remained obscure. Here, by modeling the available experimental data, we show that the sodium gradient over the cell membrane increases the sensitivity of GPCRs if their activation is thermodynamically coupled to the sodium ion translocation into the cytoplasm but decreases it if the sodium ion retreats into the extracellular space upon receptor activation. The model quantitatively describes the available data on both activation and suppression of distinct GPCRs by membrane voltage. The model also predicts selective amplification of the signal from (endogenous) agonists if only they, but not their (partial) analogs, induce sodium translocation. Comparative structure and sequence analyses of sodium-binding GPCRs indicate a key role for the conserved leucine residue in the second transmembrane helix (Leu2.46) in coupling sodium translocation to receptor activation. Hence, class A GPCRs appear to harness the energy of the transmembrane sodium potential to increase their sensitivity and selectivity.     

Construction of a sequence motif characteristic of aminergic G protein-coupled receptors

An approach to discover sequence patterns characteristic of ligand classes is described and applied to aminergic G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Putative ligand-binding residue positions were inferred from considering three lines of evidence: conservation in the subfamily absent or underrepresented in the superfamily, any available mutation data, and the physicochemical properties of the ligand. For aminergic GPCRs, the motif is composed of a conserved aspartic acid in the third transmembrane (TM) domain (rhodopsin position 117) and a conserved tryptophan in the seventh TM domain (rhodopsin position 293); the roles of each are readily justified by molecular modeling of ligand-receptor interactions. This minimally defined motif is an appropriate computational tool for identifying additional, potentially novel aminergic GPCRs from a set of experimentally uncharacterized "orphan" GPCRs, complementing existing sequence matching, clustering, and machine-learning techniques. Motif sensitivity stems from the stepwise addition of residues characteristic of an entire class of ligand (and not tailored for any particular biogenic amine). This sensitivity is balanced by careful consideration of residues (evidence drawn from mutation data, correlation of ligand properties to residue properties, and location with respect to the extracellular face), thereby maintaining specificity for the aminergic class. A number of orphan GPCRs assigned to the aminergic class by this motif were later discovered to be a novel subfamily of trace amine GPCRs, as well as the successful classification of the histamine H4 receptor.     

The conformation of the cytoplasmic helix 8 of the CB1 cannabinoid receptor using NMR and circular dichroism

The cytoplasmic helix domain (fourth cytoplasmic loop, helix 8) of numerous GPCRs such as rhodopsin and the beta-adrenergic receptor exhibits unique structural and functional characteristics. Computational models also predict the existence of such a structural motif within the CB1 cannabinoid receptor, another member of the G-protein coupled receptor superfamily. To gain insights into the conformational properties of this GPCR component, a peptide corresponding to helix 8 of the CB1 receptor with a small contiguous segment from transmembrane helix 7 (TM7) was chemically synthesized and its secondary structure determined by circular dichroism (CD) and solution NMR spectroscopy. Our studies in DPC and SDS micelles revealed significant alpha-helical structure while in an aqueous medium, the peptide exhibited a random coil configuration. The relative orientation of helix 8 within the CB1 receptor was obtained from intermolecular 31P-1H and 1H-1H NOE measurements. Our results suggest that in the presence of an amphipathic membrane environment, helix 8 assumes an alpha helical structure with an orientation parallel to the phospholipid membrane surface and perpendicular to TM7. In this model, positively charged side chains interact with the lipid headgroups while the other polar side chains face the aqueous region. The above observations may be relevant to the activation/deactivation of the CB1 receptor.     

The fourth transmembrane segment of the dopamine D2 receptor: accessibility in the binding-site crevice and position in the transmembrane bundle

The binding site of the dopamine D2 receptor, like that of homologous G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), is contained within a water-accessible crevice formed among its seven transmembrane segments (TMSs). Using the substituted-cysteine-accessibility method (SCAM), we are mapping the residues that contribute to the surface of this binding-site crevice. We have mutated to cysteine, one at a time, 21 consecutive residues in the fourth TMS (TM4). Eleven of these mutants reacted with charged sulfhydryl-specific reagents, and bound antagonist protected nine of these from reaction. For the mutants in which cysteine was substituted for residues in the cytoplasmic half of TM4, treatment with the reagents had no effect on binding, consistent with these residues being inaccessible and with the low-resolution structure of the homologous rhodopsin, in which TM3 and TM5 occlude the cytoplasmic half of TM4. Although hydrophobicity analysis positions the C-terminus of TM4 at 4.64, Pro-Pro and Pro-X-Pro motifs, which are known to disrupt alpha-helices, occur at position 4.59 in a number of homologous GPCRs. The SCAM data were consistent with a C-terminus at 4.58, but it is also possible that the alpha-helix extends one additional turn to 4.62 in the D2 receptor, which has a single Pro at 4.59. In homologous GPCRs, the high degree of sequence variation between 4.59 and 4.68 is more characteristic of a loop domain than a helical segment. This region is shown here to be very conserved within functionally related receptors, suggesting an important functional role for this putative nonhelical domain. This inference is supported by observed ligand-specific effects of mutations in this region and by the predicted spatial proximity of this segment to known ligand binding sites in other TMs.     

NMR structure of the second intracellular loop of the alpha 2A adrenergic receptor: evidence for a novel cytoplasmic helix

A major, unresolved question in signal transduction by G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) is to understand how, at atomic resolution, a GPCR activates a G protein. A step toward answering this question was made with the determination of the high-resolution structure of rhodopsin; we now know the intramolecular interactions that characterize the resting conformation of a GPCR. To what degree does this structure represent a structural paradigm for other GPCRs, especially at the cytoplasmic surface where GPCR-G protein interaction occurs and where the sequence homology is low among GPCRs? To address this question, we performed NMR studies on approximately 35-residue-long peptides including the critical second intracellular loop (i2) of the alpha 2A adrenergic receptor (AR) and of rhodopsin. To stabilize the secondary structure of the peptide termini, 4-12 residues from the adjacent transmembrane helices were included and structures determined in dodecylphosphocholine micelles. We also characterized the effects on an alpha 2A AR peptide of a D130I mutation in the conserved DRY motif. Our results show that in contrast to the L-shaped loop in the i2 of rhodopsin, the i2 of the alpha 2A AR is predominantly helical, supporting the hypothesis that there is structural diversity within GPCR intracellular loops. The D130I mutation subtly modulates the helical structure. The spacing of nonpolar residues in i2 with helical periodicity is a predictor of helical versus loop structure. These data should lead to more accurate models of the intracellular surface of GPCRs and of receptor-mediated G protein activation.     

Relevance of rhodopsin studies for GPCR activation

Rhodopsin, the dim-light photoreceptor present in the rod cells of the retina, is both a retinal-binding protein and a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR). Due to this conjunction, it benefits from an arsenal of spectroscopy techniques that can be used for its characterization, while being a model system for the important family of Class A (also referred to as “rhodopsin-like”) GPCRs. For instance, rhodopsin has been a crucial player in the field of GPCR structural biology. Until 2007, it was the only GPCR for which a high-resolution crystal structure was available, so all structure–activity analyses on GPCRs, from structure-based drug discovery to studies of structural changes upon activation, were based on rhodopsin. At present, about a third of currently available GPCR structures are still from rhodopsin. In this review, I show some examples of how these structures can still be used to gain insight into general aspects of GPCR activation. First, the analysis of the third intracellular loop in rhodopsin structures allows us to gain an understanding of the structural and dynamic properties of this region, which is absent (due to protein engineering or poor electron density) in most of the currently available GPCR structures. Second, a detailed analysis of the structure of the transmembrane domains in inactive, intermediate and active rhodopsin structures allows us to detect early conformational changes in the process of ligand-induced GPCR activation. Finally, the analysis of a conserved ligand-activated transmission switch in the transmembrane bundle of GPCRs in the context of the rhodopsin activation cycle, allows us to suggest that the structures of many of the currently available agonist-bound GPCRs may correspond to intermediate active states. While the focus in GPCR structural biology is inevitably moving away from rhodopsin, in other aspects rhodopsin is still at the forefront. For instance, the first studies of the structural basis of disease mutants in GPCRs, or the most detailed analysis of cellular GPCR signal transduction networks using a systems biology approach, have been carried out in rhodopsin. Finally, due again to its unique properties among GPCRs, rhodopsin will likely play an important role in the application of X-ray free electron laser crystallography to time-resolved structural biology in membrane proteins. Rhodopsin, thus, still remains relevant as a model system to study the molecular mechanisms of GPCR activation. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Retinal Proteins—You can teach an old dog new tricks.