System-wide Analysis Reveals Intrinsically Disordered Proteins Are Prone to Ubiquitylation after Misfolding Stress

Damaged and misfolded proteins that are no longer functional in the cell need to be eliminated. Failure to do so might lead to their accumulation and aggregation, a hallmark of many neurodegenerative diseases. Protein quality control pathways play a major role in the degradation of these proteins, which is mediated mainly by the ubiquitin proteasome system. Despite significant focus on identifying ubiquitin ligases involved in these pathways, along with their substrates, a systems-level understanding of these pathways has been lacking. For instance, as misfolded proteins are rapidly ubiquitylated, unconjugated ubiquitin is rapidly depleted from the cell upon misfolding stress; yet it is unknown whether certain targets compete more efficiently to be ubiquitylated. Using a system-wide approach, we applied statistical and computational methods to identify characteristics enriched among proteins that are further ubiquitylated after heat shock. We discovered that distinct populations of structured and, surprisingly, intrinsically disordered proteins are prone to ubiquitylation. Proteomic analysis revealed that abundant and highly structured proteins constitute the bulk of proteins in the low-solubility fraction after heat shock, but only a portion is ubiquitylated. In contrast, ubiquitylated, intrinsically disordered proteins are enriched in the low-solubility fraction after heat shock. These proteins have a very low abundance in the cell, are rarely encoded by essential genes, and are enriched in binding motifs. In additional experiments, we confirmed that several of the identified intrinsically disordered proteins were ubiquitylated after heat shock and demonstrated for two of them that their disordered regions are important for ubiquitylation after heat shock. We propose that intrinsically disordered regions may be recognized by the protein quality control machinery and thereby facilitate the ubiquitylation of proteins after heat shock.Cells face the constant threat of protein misfolding and aggregation, and thus protein quality control pathways are important in selectively targeting damaged and misfolded proteins for degradation (1, 2). The ubiquitin proteasome system serves as a major mediator of this pathway by conjugating the small protein ubiquitin onto substrates through the E1-E2-E3 (ubiquitin-activating enzyme, ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme, and ubiquitin ligase, respectively) cascade for their recognition and degradation by the proteasome (3, 4). It is known that the activity of the ubiquitin-proteasome system is associated with many neurodegenerative diseases. For instance, ubiquitin is found enriched in protein inclusions associated with these diseases (5). Furthermore, proteasome activity has been shown to decrease with age in a large variety of organisms (6), leading to increased proteotoxicity in the cell.Because of the importance of maintaining protein homeostasis, numerous ubiquitin ligases in different cellular compartments function in protein quality control pathways to target misfolded or damaged proteins for degradation via the proteasome. For instance, the conserved Hrd1 ubiquitin ligase is involved in the endoplasmic-reticulum-associated degradation pathway that targets endoplasmic reticulum proteins for retro-translocation to the cytoplasm and proteasome degradation (7). A major question is what features are recognized by ubiquitin ligases that allow them to selectively target terminally misfolded proteins for degradation, given that the folding rates and physicochemical properties vary largely from protein to protein. Several E3 ubiquitin ligases involved in cytosolic protein quality control target their substrates via their interactions with chaperone proteins. For instance, the CHIP ubiquitin ligase can directly bind to Hsp70 and Hsp90 proteins (8), which may hand over client proteins that are not successfully folded. Understanding which features are recognized by these degradation quality-control pathways might help us understand how certain misfolded proteins evade this system, leading to their accumulation and aggregation in the cell.Many studies investigating degradation protein quality control have employed model substrates (e.g. mutated proteins that misfold) to reveal which components are involved in a given quality control machinery. However, these approaches do not typically reveal the whole spectrum of substrates for these pathways. Thus, alternative system-wide approaches are also needed to provide a bigger picture. Heat shock (HS)¹ induces general misfolding at the proteome level by increasing thermal energy and was shown to cause an increase in ubiquitylation levels in the cell over 25 years ago (9, 10). However, the exact mechanism and pathways that target misfolded proteins have remained uncharacterized for a long time. We recently showed that the Hul5 ubiquitin ligase plays a major role in this heat stress response that mainly affects cytosolic proteins (11). Absence of Hul5 averts the ubiquitylation in the cytoplasm of several misfolded targets after HS, as well as low-solubility proteins in unstressed cells. Other E3 ubiquitin ligases are likely involved in this pathway (12). Interestingly, as ubiquitin constitutes about only 1% of the proteome, free unconjugated ubiquitin is rapidly depleted under stress conditions (13, 14). Given the limited amount of this protein, how does the cell triage ubiquitin among an excess of misfolded proteins? In order to gain systems-level insight, we sought to identify characteristics enriched among proteins ubiquitylated after HS using a combination of statistical and computational analysis, and we conducted additional proteomics and biochemical experiments to support our hypotheses. We discovered an unexpected susceptibility of intrinsically disordered proteins for ubiquitylation after misfolding stress.     

Plant ubiquitylation and proteolytic systems, the key elements in hormonal signaling pathways

The general function of the ubiquitylation systems is to conjugate ubiquitin to lysine residues within substrate proteins, thus targeting them for degradation by the proteasome. In Arabidopsis thaliana more than 1300 genes (approximately 5% of the proteome) encode components of the ubiquitin/26S proteasome pathway. Approximately 90% of these genes encode subunits of the E3 ubiquitin ligases, which confer substrate specificity to the ubiquitin/26S proteasome pathway. The plant E3 ubiquitin ligases comprise a large and diverse family of proteins or protein complexes containing either a HECT domain, a RING-finger or U-box domain. The SCF class of E3 ligases is the most thoroughly studied in plants because some of them participate in regulation of hormone signaling pathways. The role of the SCF is to ubiquitylate repressors of hormone response (auxin, gibberellins), whereas in response to ethylene, abscisic acid and brassinosteroids the SCF participate in degradation of positive regulators in the absence of the hormone.     

Role of SKP1-CUL1-F-Box-Protein (SCF) E3 Ubiquitin Ligases in Skin Cancer

Many biological processes such as cell proliferation, differentiation, and cell death depend precisely on the timely synthesis anddegradation of key regulatory proteins. While protein synthesis can be regulated at multiple levels, protein degradation is mainlycontrolled by the ubiquitineproteasome system (UPS), which consists of two distinct steps: (1) ubiquitylation of targeted protein by E1ubiquitin-activating enzyme, E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme and E3 ubiquitin ligase, and (2) subsequent degradation by the 26Sproteasome. Among all E3 ubiquitin ligases, the SCF (SKP1-CUL1-F-box protein) E3 ligases are the largest family and are responsiblefor the turnover of many key regulatory proteins. Aberrant regulation of SCF E3 ligases is associated with various human diseases, such ascancers, including skin cancer. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of all currently published data to define a promotingrole of SCF E3 ligases in the development of skin cancer. The future directions in this area of research are also discussed with an ultimategoal to develop small molecule inhibitors of SCF E3 ligases as a novel approach for the treatment of human skin cancer. Furthermore,altered components or substrates of SCF E3 ligases may also be developed as the biomarkers for early diagnosis or predicting prognosis.     

Gold for Ubiquitin in Vancouver: FIRST CONFERENCE ON PROTEOMICS OF PROTEIN DEGRADATION AND UBIQUITIN PATHWAYS HELD JUNE 6–8, 2010 IN VANCOUVER,UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA,ORGANIZED BY LAN HUANG,THIBAULT MAYOR,AND PEIPEI PING*

The rise of proteomics has had tremendous influence on analysis and understanding of the role of post-translational modifications in biological processes. The covalent attachment of small proteins like ubiquitin, SUMO,1 or other ubiquitin-like proteins (Ubls) is one class of post-translational modifications where proteomics has had notable impact. Various proteomics approaches, but in particular mass spectrometry-based analyses, have influenced the field and enabled significant advances over the past few years. The first meeting dedicated to proteomics of protein degradation and ubiquitin pathways showcased these advances and allowed a glimpse at future contributions of proteomics to this field. With its many attractive drug targets, the ubiquitin and proteasome system, as well as other proteolysis pathways, could offer new therapies for various human diseases including cancer and neurodegenerative disorders.The covalent linkage of ubiquitin to other proteins is catalyzed by the E1-E2-E3 cascade of enzymatic reactions whereby the many different E3 ubiquitin ligases provide substrate specificity to the process of protein ubiquitylation (1). Ubiquitylation is best known for targeting proteins for degradation by the proteasome, but other functions for ubiquitylation independent of proteolysis are also known. Likewise, modifications with SUMO or other Ubls generally do not regulate protein degradation but instead control subcellular localization, protein interactions, or change protein conformation and activity (2).The questions addressed by proteomics approaches to ubiquitylation and Ubl modifications are plentiful. They range from very specific, e.g. determination of the modified residue in a substrate protein, to complex, such as protein dynamics in proteome-wide ubiquitin (or Ubl) modification profiles (3). In either case, the rapid technological advancements (particularly in mass spectrometry instrumentation as well as quantitation and separation technologies) have allowed impressive progress, which was evident in the First Conference on Proteomics of Protein Degradation and Ubiquitin Pathways in Vancouver (http://ppdup.org/) (Fig. 1).Open in a separate windowFig. 1.Group picture from First Conference on Proteomics of Protein Degradation and Ubiquitin Pathways held June 6–8, 2010 in Vancouver (http://ppdup.org/).     

APC-targeted RAAI degradation mediates the cell cycle and root development in plants

Protein degradation by the ubiquitin-proteasome system is necessary for a normal cell cycle. As compared with knowledge of the mechanism in animals and yeast, that in plants is less known. Here we summarize research into the regulatory mechanism of protein degradation in the cell cycle in plants. Anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC), in the E3 family of enzymes, plays an important role in maintaining normal mitosis. APC activation and substrate specificity is determined by its activators, which can recognize the destruction box (D-box) in APC target proteins. Oryza sativa root architecture-associated I (OsRAA1) with GTP-binding activity was originally cloned from rice. Overexpression of of OsRAA1 inhibits the growth of primary roots in rice. Knockdown lines showed reduced height of seedlings because of abnormal cell division. OsRAA1 transgenic rice and fission yeast show a higher proportion of metaphase cells than that of controls, which suggests a blocked transition from metaphase to anaphase during mitosis. OsRAA1 co-localizes with spindle tubulin. It contains the D-box motif and interacts with OsRPT4 of the regulatory particle of 26S proteasome. OsRAA1 may be a cell cycle inhibitor that can be degraded by the ubiquitin-proteasome system, and its disruption is necessary for the transition from metaphase to anaphase during root growth in rice.Key words: cell cycle, APC, RAA1, rice, protein degradationProtein degradation by the ubiquitin-proteasome system is necessary for the normal cell cycle. The activation of 3 enzymes, E1 (ubiquitin-activating enzyme), E2 (ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme) and E3 (ubiquitin ligase), are required for the addition of ubiquitin molecules to the target protein. E1 catalyzes the formation of the thiol-ester bond between C-terminal glycine in ubiquitin and cysteine in E1, and activated ubiquitin is transferred to a cysteine in E2. With the help of an E3, ubiquitin is linked to the lysine in the target protein. Subsequent ubiquitins can be attached to the previously bound ubiquitin because of the seven lysine residues in the ubiquitin molecule. Finally, the ubiquitinated substrates are degraded by the 26S proteasome.E3 confers substrate specificity. E3 ubiquitin ligases comprise a large and diverse family of proteins or protein complexes. E3s are of two classes: homology to E6-AP carboxy terminus-containing proteins, and RING-finger domain-containing proteins. The RING-finger E3s have 4 subgroups: single subunit RING E3, VCB-Cul2 complex (VBC), Skp1/Cullin/F-box protein (SCF) and anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C).¹ The SCF ligases regulate the transition from G₁/S and G₂/M, and APC is required for mitosis. Many APC substrates have been identified in animals.² The polyubiquitinated substrates can be recognized by different ubiquitin receptors and degraded via 26S proteasome.^3,4 However, little is known about APC substrates in plants.     

A Label-free Quantitative Proteomics Strategy to Identify E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Substrates Targeted to Proteasome Degradation

The ubiquitin-proteasome system is a central mechanism for controlled proteolysis that regulates numerous cellular processes in eukaryotes. As such, defects in this system can contribute to disease pathogenesis. In this pathway, E3 ubiquitin ligases provide platforms for binding specific substrates, thereby coordinating their ubiquitylation and subsequent degradation by the proteasome. Despite the identification of many E3 ubiquitin ligases, the identities of their specific substrates are still largely unresolved. The ankyrin repeat-containing protein with a suppressor of cytokine signaling box 2 (ASB2) gene that we initially identified as a retinoic acid-response gene in acute promyelocytic leukemia cells encodes the specificity subunit of an E3 ubiquitin ligase complex that is involved in hematopoietic cell differentiation. We have recently identified filamin A and filamin B as the first ASB2 targets and shown that ASB2 triggers ubiquitylation and proteasome-mediated degradation of these proteins. Here a global quantitative proteomics strategy is provided to identify substrates of E3 ubiquitin ligases targeted to proteasomal degradation. Indeed we used label-free methods for quantifying proteins identified by shotgun proteomics in extracts of cells expressing wild-type ASB2 or an E3 ubiquitin ligase-defective mutant of ASB2 under the control of an inducible promoter. Measurements of spectral count and mass spectrometric signal intensity demonstrated a drastic decrease of filamin A and filamin B in myeloid leukemia cells expressing wild-type ASB2 compared with cells expressing an E3 ubiquitin ligase-defective mutant of ASB2. Altogether we provide an original strategy that enables identification of E3 ubiquitin ligase substrates that have to be degraded.The ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS)¹ plays an essential role in the regulation of protein stability in eukaryotic cells. Degradation of a protein by the UPS entails two successive steps: the covalent attachment of multiple ubiquitin molecules to the protein substrate and its degradation by the 26 S proteasome (1, 2). Ubiquitylation of protein substrates occurs through the sequential action of distinct enzymes: a ubiquitin-activating enzyme, E1; a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme, E2; and a ubiquitin ligase, E3, responsible for the specific recognition of substrates. Increasing attention has been recently given to the UPS leading to the identification of hundreds of E3 ubiquitin ligases (E3s). Two major classes of E3s have been described: (i) E3s of the HECT (homologous to the E6-associated protein carboxyl terminus) domain family that function as ubiquitin carriers (3, 4) and (ii) E3s of the RING (really interesting new gene) or of the U box families that have no inherent catalytic activity but recruit an E2 enzyme toward substrates (5–7).Classical approaches to identify substrates of E3s are based on the identification of interacting proteins. Although these have successfully led to the identification of a number of substrates of monomeric E3s, identification of substrates of multimeric E3s is very challenging because of the weak affinity of substrates for their requisite specificity subunit and because of the labile nature of the substrate complexed with the specificity subunit (8).Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is associated with six reciprocal translocations always involving the retinoic acid receptor α (RARα) gene (9–11). The RARα protein is a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily that stimulates myeloid differentiation in the presence of its ligand, all-trans-retinoic acid (RA). In more than 95% of APL, the t(15;17) translocation between the promyelocytic leukemia (PML) gene on chromosome 15 and the RARα gene on chromosome 17 produces the PML-RARα fusion protein (12). The PML-RARα protein enhances the repression of RARα target genes by increasing associations with corepressors (13–15) and by recruiting DNA methyltransferases (16). These complexes dissociate from the PML-RARα fusion protein in the presence of pharmacological concentrations of RA perhaps explaining why APL cells are sensitive to RA treatment. Indeed at pharmacological concentrations, RA induces complete remission in a high percentage of APL patients (17–19). By studying RA-induced differentiation of APL cells we have attempted to identify some of the genes that may be up-regulated during this process to further understand the control of growth and differentiation in leukemia (20). One gene identified in this manner, ASB2 (ankyrin repeat-containing protein with a suppressor of cytokine signaling box 2) is an RA-response gene involved in induced differentiation of myeloid leukemia cells (21–23).The ASB2 protein is a subunit of a multimeric E3 ubiquitin ligase of the cullin-RING ligase family (24, 25). The ASB2 suppressor of cytokine signaling box can be divided into a BC box that defines a binding site for the Elongin BC complex and a Cul5 box that determines the binding specificity for Cullin5 (24, 26). Indeed the ASB2 protein, by interacting with the Elongin BC complex, can assemble with a Cullin5/Rbx1 or -2 module to reconstitute an active E3 ubiquitin ligase complex (23–25). Within this complex, the ASB2 protein is the specificity subunit involved in the recruitment of specific substrate(s). Furthermore endogenous ASB2 protein was copurified with ubiquitin ligase activity in RA-treated APL cells suggesting that, during induced differentiation of leukemia cells, the ASB2 protein may target proteins involved in blocking differentiation to destruction by the proteasome machinery (24). We recently identified actin-binding proteins filamin A (FLNa) and filamin B (FLNb) as ASB2 targets and showed that ASB2 triggers ubiquitylation and drives proteasome-mediated degradation of these proteins during RA-induced differentiation of myeloid leukemia cells (23).With the aim to develop a strategy to identify E3 substrates that are degraded by the proteasome, we used an MS approach to identify ASB2 substrates in physiologically relevant settings. Indeed we used label-free quantitative proteomics to identify proteins that are absent or less abundant in cells that express wild-type ASB2 but that accumulate in cells expressing an ASB2 E3 ligase-defective mutant. Application of label-free MS methods that have the advantage to be simple, fast, and cheap enabled the identification of FLNa and FLNb as ASB2 substrates. This study provides a new strategy for the identification of E3 substrates that have to be degraded.     

蛋白质泛素化系统

泛素化是单个或多个泛素在泛素激活酶,泛素结合酶及泛素蛋白质连接酶的作用下共价修饰底物蛋白质的过程,近年来的研究发现,许多含环指的蛋白质本身是蛋白质泛素连接酶,或是多亚基连接酶中的重要成分。由于细胞内可表达200以上的环指蛋白,并且多亚基连接酶可利用同一环指蛋白但不同的底物识别蛋白。这些研究极大地丰富了对泛素化系统酶的认识,也使进一步调节和干预连接酶与底物的相互作用成为可能,新近的研究还发现,泛素化不仅可导致蛋白质的降解,还可直接影响蛋白质的活性和细胞内定位,是调节细胞内蛋白质功能和水平的主要机制之一。     

The structure and regulation of Cullin 2 based E3 ubiquitin ligases and their biological functions

Background

Cullin-RING E3 ubiquitin ligase complexes play a central role in targeting cellular proteins for ubiquitination-dependent protein turnover through 26S proteasome. Cullin-2 is a member of the Cullin family, and it serves as a scaffold protein for Elongin B and C, Rbx1 and various substrate recognition receptors to form E3 ubiquitin ligases.

Main body of the abstract

First, the composition, structure and the regulation of Cullin-2 based E3 ubiquitin ligases were introduced. Then the targets, the biological functions of complexes that use VHL, Lrr-1, Fem1b, Prame, Zyg-11, BAF250, Rack1 as substrate targeting subunits were described, and their involvement in diseases was discussed. A small molecule inhibitor of Cullins as a potential anti-cancer drug was introduced. Furthermore, proteins with VHL box that might bind to Cullin-2 were described. Finally, how different viral proteins form E3 ubiquitin ligase complexes with Cullin-2 to counter host viral defense were explained.

Conclusions

Cullin-2 based E3 ubiquitin ligases, using many different substrate recognition receptors, recognize a number of substrates and regulate their protein stability. These complexes play critical roles in biological processes and diseases such as cancer, germline differentiation and viral defense. Through the better understanding of their biology, we can devise and develop new therapeutic strategies to treat cancers, inherited diseases and viral infections.

     

SCF ubiquitin ligases in the maintenance of genome stability

In response to genotoxic stress, eukaryotic cells activate the DNA damage response (DDR), a series of pathways that coordinate cell cycle arrest and DNA repair to prevent deleterious mutations. In addition, cells possess checkpoint mechanisms that prevent aneuploidy by regulating the number of centrosomes and spindle assembly. Among these mechanisms, ubiquitin-mediated degradation of key proteins has an important role in the regulation of the DDR, centrosome duplication and chromosome segregation. This review discusses the functions of a group of ubiquitin ligases, the SCF (SKP1-CUL1-F-box protein) family, in the maintenance of genome stability. Given that general proteasome inhibitors are currently used as anticancer agents, a better understanding of the ubiquitylation of specific targets by specific ubiquitin ligases may result in improved cancer therapeutics.     

From taxonomic literature to cybertaxonomic content

In the ubiquitin-proteasome system, a subset of ubiquitylated proteins requires the AAA+ ATPase p97 (also known as VCP or Cdc48) for extraction from membranes or protein complexes before delivery to the proteasome for degradation. Diverse ubiquitin adapters are known to link p97 to its client proteins, but two recent papers on the adapter protein UBXD7, including one by Bandau et al. in BMC Biology, suggest that rather than simply linking p97 to ubiquitylated proteins, this adapter may be essential to coordinate ubiquitylation and p97-mediated extraction of the proteasome substrate. These findings add to growing indications of richly diverse roles of adapters in p97-mediated signaling functions. See research article: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7007/10/36     

Trimming of Ubiquitin Chains by Proteasome-associated Deubiquitinating Enzymes

The proteasome generally recognizes substrate via its multiubiquitin chain followed by ATP-dependent unfolding and translocation of the substrate from the regulatory particle into the proteolytic core particle to be degraded. Substrate-bound ubiquitin groups are for the most part not delivered to the core particle and broken down together with substrate but instead recovered as intact free ubiquitin and ubiquitin chains. Substrate deubiquitination on the proteasome is mediated by three distinct deubiquitinating enzymes associated with the regulatory particle: RPN11, UCH37, and USP14. RPN11 cleaves at the base of the ubiquitin chain where it is linked to the substrate, whereas UCH37 and apparently USP14 mediate a stepwise removal of ubiquitin from the substrate by disassembling the chain from its distal tip. In contrast to UCH37 and USP14, RPN11 shows degradation-coupled activity; RPN11-mediated deubiquitination is apparently delayed until the proteasome is committed to degrade the substrate. Accordingly, RPN11-mediated deubiquitination promotes substrate degradation. In contrast, removal of ubiquitin prior to commitment could antagonize substrate degradation by promoting substrate dissociation from the proteasome. Emerging evidence suggests that USP14 and UCH37 can both suppress substrate degradation in this way. One line of study has shown that small molecule USP14 inhibitors can enhance proteasome function in cells, which is consistent with this model. Enhancing protein degradation could potentially have therapeutic applications for diseases involving toxic proteins that are proteasome substrates. However, the responsiveness of substrates to inhibition of proteasomal deubiquitinating enzymes may vary substantially. This substrate specificity and its mechanistic basis should be addressed in future studies.The eukaryotic proteasome is dedicated primarily to the degradation of proteins tagged by ubiquitin (1). Proteasomes strongly prefer multiubiquitinated protein substrates. The successive addition of ubiquitin groups to the substrate by ubiquitin ligases is usually accomplished through the formation of ubiquitin chains. The proteasome has much in common with the simple ATP-dependent proteases of prokaryotes and mitochondria (2, 3), although only the proteasome recognizes the ubiquitin modification. In all cases, the ATPases form a hexameric ring complex. These rings are homomeric in the case of the prokaryotic and mitochondrial proteases, whereas in eukaryotic proteasomes, the ATPase ring is heteromeric. Proteasomes and the simple ATP-dependent proteases are fundamentally similar in that they all have an ATPase ring (found within the regulatory particle [RP]1 in proteasomes, also known as the 19S particle and PA700) abutting a proteolytic complex (the core particle [CP] in proteasomes, also known as the 20S particle), although in some cases, the ATPase and protease domains are present on the same polypeptide chain (Fig. 1). Furthermore, this ancient organization of ATP-dependent proteases involves stacked ring complexes. Substrates are translocated from one ring to the next via the central pore within each ring. For most substrates, movement from ring to ring is driven by ATP hydrolysis. Thus, the substrate is captured by the ATPase ring of the RP and then translocated into the central cavity of the CP where it is hydrolyzed.Open in a separate windowFig. 1.Deubiquitinating enzymes of proteasome. In metazoans, three DUBs associate with the proteasome as shown. Each is associated with the 19-subunit RP. The detailed positioning of these enzymes on the RP is not known and is represented here schematically. RPN11 cuts at the base of the chain to release the chain en bloc. As shown, this is coupled (by an unknown mechanism) to translocation of the substrate from the RP to the CP to be degraded. In contrast, the action of USP14 and UCH37 is thought to promote substrate release from the proteasome rather than degradation. However, it should be noted that the attack of these enzymes on a substrate does not guarantee release, especially as their action on the chain is gradual, proceeding stepwise over time from the distal tip of the ubiquitin chain. Some substrates may carry more than one ubiquitin chain and thus be processed in a more complex manner. Moreover, more than one DUB might act on a given chain. The proteasome icon, adapted from Ref. 30 with permission, is based on cryo-EM imaging.The pathway of translocation contains a series of narrow constrictions through which folded proteins cannot pass. The inability of a typical folded protein to pass through these “filters” defines in part the selectivity of such proteases. However, the ATPases can exert a pulling force on the substrate that is strong enough to unfold the protein, which allows for passage through the series of constrictions. This force is exerted within the central channel of the ATPase complex. Thus, translocation and unfolding of the substrate are generally coupled events (1–3).Although not departing from this paradigm, the eukaryotic proteasome interacts with substrate in a more complex manner as a result of interactions involving the ubiquitin tag. Thus, many of the 13 subunits that were added to the evolutionarily ancient ATPase complex to form the RP in the eukaryotic lineage participate in recognition and processing of the ubiquitin tag (1). For example, the yeast proteasome has five and probably more distinct ubiquitin receptors, two that are integral subunits and three that are reversibly proteasome-associated (4). In addition, proteasomes of mammals have three distinct deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs). The multiplicity of DUBs points to a surprisingly complex role of deubiquitination in proteasome function.