Glia Disease and Repair—Remyelination

The inability of the mammalian central nervous system (CNS) to undergo spontaneous regeneration has long been regarded as a central tenet of neurobiology. However, although this is largely true of the neuronal elements of the adult mammalian CNS, save for discrete populations of granular neurons, the same is not true of its glial elements. In particular, the loss of oligodendrocytes, which results in demyelination, triggers a spontaneous and often highly efficient regenerative response, remyelination, in which new oligodendrocytes are generated and myelin sheaths are restored to denuded axons. Yet, remyelination in humans is not without limitation, and a variety of demyelinating conditions are associated with sustained and disabling myelin loss. In this review, we will review the biology of remyelination, including the cells and signals involved; describe when remyelination occurs and when and why it fails and the consequences of its failure; and discuss approaches for therapeutically enhancing remyelination in demyelinating diseases of both children and adults, both by stimulating endogenous oligodendrocyte progenitor cells and by transplanting these cells into demyelinated brain.     

Meiotic Checkpoints: Repair or Removal?

Defects in meiosis can produce different checkpoint responses in female and male animals, suggesting that meiotic checkpoints exhibit sexual dimorphism. A recent study in Caenorhabditis elegans indicates that meiotic checkpoint activation is similar between the sexes and the primary difference lies in the downstream consequences.     

DNA Repair Mechanisms in Huntington’s Disease

The human genome is under continuous attack by a plethora of harmful agents. Without the development of several dedicated DNA repair pathways, the genome would have been destroyed and cell death, inevitable. However, while DNA repair enzymes generally maintain the integrity of the whole genome by properly repairing mutagenic and cytotoxic intermediates, there are cases in which the DNA repair machinery is implicated in causing disease rather than protecting against it. One case is the instability of gene-specific trinucleotides, the causative mutations of numerous disorders including Huntington’s disease. The DNA repair proteins induce mutations that are different from the genome-wide mutations that arise in the absence of repair enzymes; they occur at definite loci, they occur in specific tissues during development, and they are age-dependent. These latter characteristics make pluripotent stem cells a suitable model system for triplet repeat expansion disorders. Pluripotent stem cells can be kept in culture for a prolonged period of time and can easily be differentiated into any tissue, e.g., cells along the neural lineage. Here, we review the role of DNA repair proteins in the process of triplet repeat instability in Huntington’s disease and also the potential use of pluripotent stem cells to investigate neurodegenerative disorders.     

Repair of DNA–Protein Cross-links in Mammalian Cells

DNA–protein cross-links are generated by both endogenous and exogenous DNA damaging agents, as intermediates during normal DNA metabolism, and during abortive base excision repair. Cross-links are relatively common lesions that are lethal when they block progression of DNA polymerases. DNA–protein cross-links may be broadly categorized into four groups by the DNA and protein chemistries near the cross-link and by the source of the cross-link: DNA–protein cross-links may be found (1) in nicked DNA at the 3' end of one strand (topo I), (2) in nicked DNA at the 5' end of one strand (pol beta), (3) at the 5' ends of both strands adjacent to nicks in close proximity (topo II; Spo 11), and (4) in one strand of duplex DNA (UV irradiation; bifunctional carcinogens and chemotherapeutic agents). Repair mechanisms are reasonably well-defined for groups 1 and 3, and suggested for groups 2 and 4. Our work is focused on the recognition and removal of DNA–protein cross-links in duplex DNA (group 4).     

Protein–Protein Interactions in DNA Base Excision Repair

The system of base excision repair (BER) ensures correction of the most abundant DNA damages in mammalian cells and plays an important role in maintaining genome stability. Enzymes and protein factors participate in the multistage BER in a coordinated fashion, which ensures repair efficiency. The suggested coordination mechanisms are based on formation of protein complexes stabilized via either direct or indirect DNA-mediated interactions. The results of investigation of direct interactions of the proteins participating in BER with each other and with other proteins are outlined in this review. The known protein partners and sites responsible for their interaction are presented for the main participants as well as quantitative characteristics of their affinity. Information on the mechanisms of regulation of protein–protein interactions mediated by DNA intermediates and posttranslational modification is presented. It can be suggested based on all available data that the multiprotein complexes are formed on chromatin independent of the DNA damage with the help of key regulators of the BER process – scaffold protein XRCC1 and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1. The composition of multiprotein complexes changes dynamically depending on the DNA damage and the stage of BER process.     

Repair of idarubicin-induced DNA damage: A cause of resistance?

Idarubicin, a widely used anticancer drug inhibits topoisomerase (topo) IIalpha and induces DNA double strand breaks. The finding that idarubicin-induced DNA damage is repaired before cell death is initiated encouraged us to examine the role of DNA repair for the cytotoxicity of idarubicin in human promyelocytic HL60 leukaemia cells. We found that DNA double strand breaks induced by a 90 min transient exposure to 0.5 microgml(-1) idarubicin were rapidly repaired throughout the whole population, while topo IIalpha itself was degraded. In spite of DNA repair, the vast majority of cells died within 40 h. Using differential staining of the chromatids and microscopic evaluation of DNA break points, we found evidence for a high number of false ligations of loose DNA strands arising from the inhibition of topo IIalpha action by idarubicin. If mainly actively transcribed genes are affected, this results in a disruption of vital genetic information, of regulatory sequences and, ultimately, in induction of the cell death pathway. Our results confirm the hypothesis that misrepair of DNA damage is a decisive event in idarubicin-induced cell death. They are discussed in the context of topo IIalpha-function and the currently known mechanisms of DNA double strand break repair.     

Autophagy Coupling Interplay: Can Improve Cellular Repair and Aging?

Regular protein synthesis is a needful and complex task for a healthy cell. Improper folding leads to the deposition of misfolded proteins in cells. Autophagy and ubiquitin–proteasome system (UPS) are the conserved intracellular degradation processes of eukaryotic cells. How exactly these two pathways cross talk to each other is unclear. We do not know how the impairment of autophagy or UPS leads to the disturbance in cellular homeostasis and contribute into cellular aging and neurodegeneration. Here in this review, we will focus on the functional interconnections of autophagy and UPS, and why their loss of function results in abnormal aggregation of misfolded proteotoxic species in cells. Finally, we enumerate and discuss the crucial inducers of autophagy pathways and elaborate their intersection steps, which have been considered to be advantageous in aging linked with the abnormal protein aggregation. The final goal of this review is to improve our current understanding about multifaceted properties and interactions of autophagy and UPS, which may provide new insights to identify novel therapeutic strategies for aging and neurodegenerative diseases.     

Human Base Excision Repair Creates a Bias Toward ?1 Frameshift Mutations

Frameshift mutations are particularly deleterious to protein function and play a prominent role in carcinogenesis. Most commonly these mutations involve the insertion or omission of a single nucleotide by a DNA polymerase that slips on a damaged or undamaged template. The mismatch DNA repair pathway can repair these nascent polymerase errors. However, overexpression of enzymes of the base excision repair (BER) pathway is known to increase the frequency of frameshift mutations suggesting competition between these pathways. We have examined the fate of DNA containing single nucleotide bulges in human cell extracts and discovered that several deaminated or alkylated nucleotides are efficiently removed by BER. Because single nucleotide bulges are more highly exposed we anticipate that they would be highly susceptible to spontaneous DNA damage. As a model for this, we have shown that chloroacetaldehyde reacts more than 18-fold faster with an A-bulge than with a stable A·T base pair to create alkylated DNA adducts that can be removed by alkyladenine DNA glycosylase. Reconstitution of the BER pathway using purified components establishes that bulged DNA is efficiently processed. Single nucleotide deletion is predicted to repair +1 frameshift events, but to make −1 frameshift events permanent. Therefore, these findings suggest an additional factor contributing to the bias toward deletion mutations.     

DNA Repair: A changing geography? (1964–2008)

This article aims to explain the current state of DNA Repair studies’ global geography by focusing on the genesis of the community. Bibliometric data is used to localize scientific activities related to DNA Repair at the city level. The keyword “DNA Repair” was introduced first by American scientists. It started to spread after 1964 that is to say, after P. Howard-Flanders (Yale University), P. Hanawalt (Stanford University) and R. Setlow (Oak Ridge Laboratories) found evidence for Excision Repair mechanisms. It was the first stage in the emergence of an autonomous scientific community. In this article, we will try to assess to what extent the geo-history of this scientific field is determinant in understanding its current geography. In order to do so, we will localize the places where the first “DNA Repair” publications were signed fifty years ago and the following spatial diffusion process, which led to the current geography of the field. Then, we will focus on the evolution of the research activity of “early entrants” in relation to the activity of “latecomers”. This article is an opportunity to share with DNA Repair scientists some research results of a dynamic field in Science studies: spatial scientometrics.     

Repair or regenerate—how can we tip the balance?

The fourth EMBO conference on ‘The Molecular and Cellular Basis of Regeneration and Repair’, held in September 2012, brought together researchers from both the regeneration and wound‐healing fields. The meeting spanned a wide range of research topics from basic science to clinical application, and a veritable melting pot of model organisms and approaches resulted in an excellent fourth conference in this series.     

Involvement of the Yeast DNA Polymerase δ in DNA Repair in Vivo

The POL3 encoded catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase δ possesses a highly conserved C-terminal cysteine-rich domain in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutations in some of its cysteine codons display a lethal phenotype, which demonstrates an essential function of this domain. The thermosensitive mutant pol3-13, in which a serine replaces a cysteine of this domain, exhibits a range of defects in DNA repair, such as hypersensitivity to different DNA-damaging agents and deficiency for induced mutagenesis and for recombination. These phenotypes are observed at 24°, a temperature at which DNA replication is almost normal; this differentiates the functions of POL3 in DNA repair and DNA replication. Since spontaneous mutagenesis and spontaneous recombination are efficient in pol3-13, we propose that POL3 plays an important role in DNA repair after irradiation, particularly in the error-prone and recombinational pathways. Extragenic suppressors of pol3-13 are allelic to sdp5-1, previously identified as an extragenic suppressor of pol3-11. SDP5, which is identical to HYS2, encodes a protein homologous to the p50 subunit of bovine and human DNA polymerase δ. SDP5 is most probably the p55 subunit of Polδ of S. cerevisiae and seems to be associated with the catalytic subunit for both DNA replication and DNA repair.     

RhoB Promotes γH2AX Dephosphorylation and DNA Double-Strand Break Repair

Unlike other Rho GTPases, RhoB is rapidly induced by DNA damage, and its expression level decreases during cancer progression. Because inefficient repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) can lead to cancer, we investigated whether camptothecin, an anticancer drug that produces DSBs, induces RhoB expression and examined its role in the camptothecin-induced DNA damage response. We show that in camptothecin-treated cells, DSBs induce RhoB expression by a mechanism that depends notably on Chk2 and its substrate HuR, which binds to RhoB mRNA and protects it against degradation. RhoB-deficient cells fail to dephosphorylate γH2AX following camptothecin removal and show reduced efficiency of DSB repair by homologous recombination. These cells also show decreased activity of protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A), a phosphatase for γH2AX and other DNA damage and repair proteins. Thus, we propose that DSBs activate a Chk2-HuR-RhoB pathway that promotes PP2A-mediated dephosphorylation of γH2AX and DSB repair. Finally, we show that RhoB-deficient cells accumulate endogenous γH2AX and chromosomal abnormalities, suggesting that RhoB loss increases DSB-mediated genomic instability and tumor progression.     

Inter-��-trypsin Inhibitor Promotes Bronchial Epithelial Repair after Injury through Vitronectin Binding

Pulmonary epithelial injury is central to the pathogenesis of many lung diseases, such as asthma, pulmonary fibrosis, and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Regulated epithelial repair is crucial for lung homeostasis and prevents scar formation and inflammation that accompany dysregulated healing. The extracellular matrix (ECM) plays an important role in epithelial repair after injury. Vitronectin is a major ECM component that promotes epithelial repair. However, the factors that modify cell-vitronectin interactions after injury and help promote epithelial repair are not well studied. Inter-α-trypsin inhibitor (IaI) is an abundant serum protein. IaI heavy chains contain von Willebrand A domains that can bind the arginine-glycine-aspartate domain of vitronectin. We therefore hypothesized that IaI can bind vitronectin and promote vitronectin-induced epithelial repair after injury. We show that IaI binds vitronectin at the arginine-glycine-aspartate site, thereby promoting epithelial adhesion and migration in vitro. Furthermore, we show that IaI-deficient mice have a dysregulated response to epithelial injury in vivo, consisting of decreased proliferation and epithelial metaplasia. We conclude that IaI interacts not only with hyaluronan, as previously reported, but also other ECM components like vitronectin and is an important regulator of cellular repair after injury.Epithelial injury is a crucial component in the pathogenesis of many lung diseases. Bronchial epithelial injury occurs chronically in asthmatic patients (1, 2). Furthermore, alveolar and bronchiolar epithelial injury are early triggers in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (3) and in lung transplant rejection (4), respectively. In acute respiratory distress syndrome, diffuse alveolar epithelial injury initiates the inflammatory and fibrotic response that leads to lung dysfunction (5). It is now believed that a dysregulated response to epithelial injury ultimately causes fibroproliferation, scar formation, and respiratory failure in acute as well as chronic lung injury (3). It is therefore important to understand the epithelial repair process after pulmonary epithelial injury, if we are to develop causal treatments for these diseases.The mechanisms governing epithelial repair are incompletely understood. Epithelial repair encompasses cell proliferation, migration, and differentiation. All of these processes require cell interactions with the extracellular matrix (ECM).² ECM components like tenascin C, fibronectin, and vitronectin promote epithelial regeneration through integrin binding. Vitronectin (Vn) is a pluripotent 75-kDa plasma and ECM glycoprotein that regulates a number of biological processes such as coagulation, complement activation, and wound healing. Vn promotes cell adhesion and migration via binding primarily to integrins α_vβ₁, α_vβ₃, α_vβ₅, and α_vβ₆. After cell binding, Vn can protect bronchial epithelial cells from apoptosis (6) by inducing Akt phosphorylation and preventing caspase and Fas-associated with death domain (FADD) activation (7). Vn also binds to non-integrin cell receptors such as urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor to promote changes in cell morphology, migration, and signal transduction (8). Consequently, Vn deficiency impairs bronchial (6) and alveolar (9) epithelial repair.Cell-Vn interactions are modulated by other extracellular factors. For example, plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1) is bound to circulating Vn and forms multimers with Vn upon extravasation to the extracellular space (10), thus possibly activating Vn into an adhesive form (11). Furthermore, Vn possesses several domains that can function as possible ligands, such as a somatomedin B domain, an arginine-glycine-aspartate (RGD) domain, and a heparin-binding domain. However, the extent to which other serum or ECM factors may interact with Vn and influence cell-Vn interactions is unclear.In this report, we investigated possible interactions between Vn and the serum and ECM protein inter-α-trypsin inhibitor. Inter-α-trypsin inhibitor (IaI) is a complex protein found in relatively high concentrations in mammalian plasma. It is made up of a light chain (called bikunin for its two Kunitz domains), which confers the protease inhibitory activity, as well as two heavy chains (12). The precise functions of the heavy chains are unknown. Heavy chains contain a von Willebrand Type A (vWA) domain, and they have been shown to bind to hyaluronan and thereby stabilize the extracellular matrix. However, vWA domains are fairly promiscuous and can bind to a large array of proteins, including RGD domains. Furthermore, IaI is expressed by epithelial cells under stress conditions and is incorporated into de novo ECM structures produced by stressed epithelia (13). We therefore hypothesized that IaI may interact with Vn and thus promote epithelial survival after injury.     

Quo Vadis Brain Repair? A Long Axonal Journey in the Adult CNS

Recently in Nature Neuroscience, Gaillard et al. (2007) study axonal projections from embryonic cortical explants grafted into acutely damaged adult motor cortex. After attempting to rule out fusion of donor tissue with pre-existing host circuitry, the authors report robust long-distance donor axonal projections and synaptic integration into target regions appropriate for the motor system.     

DNA Repair Systems in Archaea: Mementos from the Last Universal Common Ancestor?

DNA repair in the Archaea is relevant to the consideration of genome maintenance and replication fidelity in the last universal common ancestor (LUCA) from two perspectives. First, these prokaryotes embody a mix of bacterial and eukaryal molecular features. Second, DNA repair proteins would have been essential in LUCA to maintain genome integrity, regardless of the environmental temperature. Yet we know very little of the basic molecular mechanisms of DNA damage and repair in the Archaea in general. Many studies on DNA repair in archaea have been conducted with hyperthermophiles because of the additional stress imposed on their macromolecules by high temperatures. In addition, of the six complete archaeal genome sequences published so far, five are thermophilic archaea. We have recently shown that the hyperthermophile Pyrococcus furiosus has an extraordinarily high capacity for repair of radiation-induced double-strand breaks and we have identified and sequenced several genes involved in DNA repair in P. furiosus. At the sequence level, only a few genes share homology with known bacterial repair genes. For instance, our phylogenetic analysis indicates that archaeal recombinases occur in two paralogous gene families, one of which is very deeply branched, and both recombinases are more closely related to the eukaryotic RAD51 and Dmc1 gene families than to the Escherichia coli recA gene. We have also identified a gene encoding a repair endo/exonuclease in the genomes of several Archaea. The archaeal sequences are highly homologous to those of the eukaryotic Rad2 family and they cluster with genes of the FEN-1 subfamily, which are known to be involved in DNA replication and repair in eukaryotes. We argue that there is a commonality of mechanisms and protein sequences, shared between prokaryotes and eukaryotes for several modes of DNA repair, reflecting diversification from a minimal set of genes thought to represent the genome of the LUCA.     

Mobilizing Endogenous Stem Cells for Repair and Regeneration: Are We There Yet?

Harnessing endogenous repair mechanisms to promote tissue regeneration in situations in which it does not normally occur has long been a goal in biomedical science. Recent advances in tissue stem cells indicate that this goal may now be achievable. Here we consider both the promise and the hurdles we still have to overcome.     

Repair of Abdominal Wall Defects with Biodegradable Laminar Prostheses: Polymeric or Biological?

Introduction

Biological and synthetic laminar absorbable prostheses are available for the repair of hernia defects in the abdominal wall. They share the important feature of being gradually degraded in the host, resulting in place the formation of a neotissue. This study was designed to assess the host tissue’s incorporation of collagen bioprostheses and a synthetic absorbable prosthesis.

Methods

Partial defects were created in the abdominal walls of 72 New Zealand rabbits and repaired using collagen bioprostheses Tutomesh® and Strattice® or a synthetic prosthesis Bio-A®. Specimens were collected for light microscopy, collagens gene and protein expression, macrophage response and biomechanical resistance at 14, 30, 90 and 180 days post-implantation.

Results

Tutomesh® and Bio-A® were gradually infiltrated by the host tissue and almost completely degraded by 180 days post-implantation. In contrast, Strattice® exhibited material encapsulation, no prosthetic degradation and low cell infiltration at earlier timepoints, whereas at later study time, collagen deposition could be observed within the mesh. In the short term, Bio-A® exhibited higher level of collagen 1 and 3 mRNA expression compared with the two other biological prostheses, which exhibited two peaks of higher expression at 14 and 90 days. The expression of collagen III was homogeneous throughout the study and collagen I deposition was more evident in Strattice®. Macrophage response decreased over time in biomeshes. However, in the synthetic mesh remained high and homogeneous until 90 days. The biomechanical analysis demonstrated the progressively increasing tensile strength of all biomaterials.

Conclusions

The tissue infiltration of laminar absorbable prostheses is affected by the structure and composition of the mesh. The synthetic prosthesis exhibited a distinct pattern of tissue incorporation and a greater macrophage response than did the biological prostheses. Of all of the laminar, absorbable biomaterials that were tested in this study, Strattice® demonstrated the optimal levels of integration and degradation.