A deletion adjacent to the maize transposable element Mu-1 accompanies loss of Adh1 expression.

Insertion of the maize transposable element Mu-1 into the first intron of the alcohol dehydrogenase locus (Adh1) of maize produced mutant Adh1-S3034 with 40% of the wild-type level of protein and mRNA. Continued instability at this locus resulted in secondary mutations with lower levels of protein expression. One of these, Adh1-S3034a, has no detectable ADH1 expression. This paper describes the precise nature of the changes in the Adh1 gene that gave rise to the S3034a allele. The Mu-1 element is still present in the mutant, but Adh1 sequences immediately adjacent to the element are deleted. The deletion starts precisely at the Mu-1 insertion site and extends 74 bp leftward removing part of the first intron, the intron:exon junction and 2 bp of the eleventh amino acid codon in the first exon of the gene. Tests for reversion within the somatic tissue of plants show that mutant S3034a, unlike its progenitor, is stably null for ADH1 activity.     

The effect of insertion of the maize transposable elementMutator is dependent on genetic background

A secondary mutant, derived from an allele of maize alcohol dehydrogenase 1 (Adh1) carrying a Mutator transposable element (Mu1) in its first intron, was reported to exhibit a threefold decrease in ADH enzymatic activity and steady-state RNA levels compared to the original mutant. The original mutant,Adh1-S3034 (abbreviatedS3034), was previously characterized at the molecular level. The derivative, abbreviatedS3034b, has now been cloned; at the DNA sequence level the insertion and surroundingAdh1 sequences are indistinguishable fromS3034. Furthermore, in our lines there is no difference in relative ADH activities between products of the two putative alleles. A comparison of gene expression in heterozygotes obtained by crossing to different tester lines reveals a correlation between the measured decrease in levels of ADH polypeptide produced by the mutant allele and the background in which it is measured; this effect is distinct from any background-related variation in the expression of the progenitor allele. It does not appear to be attributable to alternative patterns of DNA modification. It appears to reflect a background-associated difference in the level of normalAdh1-RNA produced. Thus the previously reported distinction betweenS3034 andS3034b may be due to differences in the extent to which the mutant allele and a given genetic background interact to produce functionalAdh1-RNA.This research was supported by United States Public Health Service Grant GM38616 and United States Department of Agriculture Grant 87-CRCR-1-2500 to J.S. D.O. was supported by an NIH predoctoral training grant to the Department of Genetics.