Sex chromosome elimination,X chromosome inactivation and reactivation in the southern brown bandicoot Isoodon obesulus (Marsupialia: Peramelidae)

Cytogenetic studies have shown that bandicoots (family Peramelidae) eliminate one X chromosome in females and the Y chromosome in males from some somatic tissues at different stages during development. The discovery of a polymorphism for X-linked phosphoglycerate kinase (PGK-1) in a population of Isoodon obesulus from Mount Gambier, South Australia, has allowed us to answer a number of long standing questions relating to the parental source of the eliminated X chromosome, X chromosome inactivation and reactivation in somatic and germ cells of female bandicoots. We have found no evidence of paternal PGK-1 allele expression in a wide range of somatic tissues and cell types from known female heterozygotes. We conclude that paternal X chromosome inactivation occurs in bandicoots as in other marsupial groups and that it is the paternally derived X chromosome that is eliminated from some cell types of females. The absence of PGK-1 paternal activity in somatic cells allowed us to examine the state of X chromosome activity in germ cells. Electrophoresis of germ cells from different aged pouch young heterozygotes showed only maternal allele expression in oogonia whereas an additional paternally derived band was observed in pre-dictyate oocytes. We conclude that reactivation of the inactive X chromosome occurs around the onset of meiosis in female bandicoots. As in other mammals, late replication is a common feature of the Y chromosome in male and the inactive X chromosome in female bandicoots. The basis of sex chromosome loss is still not known; however later timing of DNA synthesis is involved. Our finding that the paternally derived X chromosome is eliminated in females suggests that late DNA replication may provide the imprint for paternal X inactivation and the elimination of sex chromosomes in bandicoots.     

Heterogeneous X inactivation in trophoblastic cells of human full-term female placentas

In female mammalian cells, one of the two X chromosomes is inactivated to compensate for gene-dose effects, which would be otherwise doubled compared with that in male cells. In somatic lineages in mice, the inactive X chromosome can be of either paternal or maternal origin, whereas the paternal X chromosome is specifically inactivated in placental tissue. In human somatic cells, X inactivation is mainly random, but both random and preferential paternal X inactivation have been reported in placental tissue. To shed more light on this issue, we used PCR to study the methylation status of the polymorphic androgen-receptor gene in full-term human female placentas. The sites investigated are specifically methylated on the inactive X chromosome. No methylation was found in microdissected stromal tissue, whether from placenta or umbilical cord. Of nine placentas for which two closely apposed samples were studied, X inactivation was preferentially maternal in three, was preferentially paternal in one, and was heterogeneous in the remaining five. Detailed investigation of two additional placentas demonstrated regions with balanced (1:1 ratio) preferentially maternal and preferentially paternal X inactivation. No differences in ratio were observed in samples microdissected to separate trophoblast and stromal tissues. We conclude that methylation of the androgen receptor in human full-term placenta is specific for trophoblastic cells and that the X chromosome can be of either paternal or maternal origin.     

Imprint switching for non-random X-chromosome inactivation during mouse oocyte growth

In mammals, X-chromosome inactivation occurs in all female cells, leaving only a single active X chromosome. This serves to equalise the dosage of X-linked genes in male and female cells. In the mouse, the paternally derived X chromosome (X(P)) is imprinted and preferentially inactivated in the extraembryonic tissues whereas in the embryonic tissues inactivation is random. To investigate how X(P) is chosen as an inactivated X chromosome in the extraembryonic cells, we have produced experimental embryos by serial nuclear transplantation from non-growing (ng) oocytes and fully grown (fg) oocytes, in which the X chromosomes are marked with (1) an X-linked lacZ reporter gene to assay X-chromosome activity, or (2) the Rb(X.9)6H translocation as a cytogenetic marker for studying replication timing. In the extraembryonic tissues of these ng/fg embryos, the maternal X chromosome (X(M)) derived from the ng oocyte was preferentially inactivated whereas that from the fg oocyte remained active. However, in the embryonic tissues, X inactivation was random. This suggests that (1) a maternal imprint is set on the X(M) during oocyte growth, (2) the maternal imprint serves to render the X(M) resistant to inactivation in the extraembryonic tissues and (3) the X(M) derived from an ng oocyte resembles a normal X(P).     

Genetic and developmental analysis of X-inactivation in interspecific hybrid mice suggests a role for the Y chromosome in placental dysplasia

It has been shown previously that abnormal placental growth, i.e., hyper- and hypoplasia, occurs in crosses and backcrosses between different mouse (Mus) species. A locus that contributes to this abnormal development has been mapped to the X chromosome. Unexpectedly, an influence of fetal sex on placental development has been observed, in that placentas attached to male fetuses tended to exhibit a more pronounced phenotype than placentas attached to females. Here, we have analyzed this sex dependence in more detail. Our results show that differences between male and female placental weights are characteristic of interspecific matings and are not observed in intraspecific Mus musculus matings. The effect is retained in congenic lines that contain differing lengths of M. spretus-derived X chromosome. Expression of the X-linked gene Pgk1 from the maternal allele only and lack of overall activity of two paternally inherited X-linked transgenes indicate that reactivation or lack of inactivation of the paternal X chromosome in trophoblasts of interspecific hybrids is not a frequent occurrence. Thus, the difference between male and female placentas seems not to be caused by faulty preferential X-inactivation. Therefore, these data suggest that the sex difference of placental weights in interspecific hybrids is caused by interactions with the Y chromosome.     

Parental source of chromosome imprinting and its relevance for X chromosome inactivation

Abstract. In imprinting, homologous chromosomes behave differently during development according to their parental origin. Typically, paternally derived chromosomes are preferentially inactivated or eliminated. Examples of such phenomena include inactivation of the mammalian X chromosome, inactivation or elimination of one haploid chromosome set in male coccids, and elimination of paternal X chromosomes in the fly Sciara . It has generally been thought that the paternal chromosomes bear an imprint leading to their inactivation or elimination. However, alteration of the parental origin of chromosomes, as in the study of parthenogenotes in mammals and coccids, shows that passage of chromosomes through a male germ cell or fertilization is not essential for inactivation or elimination. It appears that neither chromosome set is programmed to resist or undergo inactivation. Instead the two sets differ in relative sensitivity, and the question is whether the maternal set have an imprint for resistance, or the paternal set one for susceptibility. Very early in development of mammals both X chromosomes are active. This makes it simpler to envisage the maternal X bearing an imprint for resistance to inactivation, which persists through the early developmental period. Similar considerations also apply in coccids and Sciara . Thus, imprinting should be regarded as a phenomenon conferred on the maternal chromosomes in the oocyte. This permits simpler models for the mechanism of X-inactivation, and weakens the case for evolution of X-inactivation from an earlier form of inactivation during male gametogenesis. One may speculate whether imprinting affects timing of gene action in development.     

Nrk, an X-linked protein kinase in the germinal center kinase family, is required for placental development and fetoplacental induction of labor

The complete mechanism of labor induction in eutherian mammals remains unclear. Although important roles for the fetus and placenta in triggering labor have been proposed, no gene has been shown to be required in the fetus/placenta for labor induction. Here we show that Nrk, an X-linked gene encoding a Ser/Thr kinase of the germinal center kinase family, is essential in the fetus/placenta for labor in mice. Nrk was specifically expressed in the spongiotrophoblast layer, a fetus-derived region of the placenta, and Nrk disruption caused dysregulated overgrowth of the layer. Due to preferential inactivation of the paternally derived X chromosome in placenta, Nrk heterozygous mutant placentas exhibited a similar defect to that in Nrk-null tissues when the wild-type allele was paternally derived. However, the phenotype was weaker than in Nrk-null placentas due to leaky Nrk expression from the inactivated X chromosome. Crossing of Nrk-null females to wild-type and Nrk-null males, as well as uterine transfer of Nrk-null fetuses to wild-type females, revealed that pregnant mice exhibit a severe defect in delivery when all fetuses/placentas are Nrk-null. In addition, Nrk was not expressed in female reproductive tissues such as the uterus and ovary, as well as the fetal amnion and yolk sac, in pregnant mice. Progesterone and estrogen levels in the maternal circulation and placenta, which control the timing of labor, were unaffected upon Nrk disruption. We thus provide evidence for a novel labor-inducing fetoplacental signal that depends on the X chromosome and possibly arises from the placenta.     

Parental source of chromosome imprinting and its relevance for X chromosome inactivation

In imprinting, homologous chromosomes behave differently during development according to their parental origin. Typically, paternally derived chromosomes are preferentially inactivated or eliminated. Examples of such phenomena include inactivation of the mammalian X chromosome, inactivation or elimination of one haploid chromosome set in male coccids, and elimination of paternal X chromosomes in the fly Sciara. It has generally been thought that the paternal chromosomes bear an imprint leading to their inactivation or elimination. However, alteration of the parental origin of chromosomes, as in the study of parthenogenotes in mammals and coccids, shows that passage of chromosomes through a male germ cell or fertilization is not essential for inactivation or elimination. It appears that neither chromosome set is programmed to resist or undergo inactivation. Instead the two sets differ in relative sensitivity, and the question is whether the maternal set have an imprint for resistance, or the paternal set one for susceptibility. Very early in development of mammals both X chromosomes are active. This makes it simpler to envisage the maternal X bearing an imprint for resistance to inactivation, which persists through the early developmental period. Similar considerations also apply in coccids and Sciara. Thus, imprinting should be regarded as a phenomenon conferred on the maternal chromosomes in the oocyte. This permits simpler models for the mechanism of X-inactivation, and weakens the case for evolution of X-inactivation from an earlier form of inactivation during male gametogenesis. One may speculate whether imprinting affects timing of gene action in development.     

Evidence of a preferential inactivation of the paternally derived X chromosome in a 46,XX true hermaphrodite

Summary The pattern of inheritance of several X polymorphic markers is studied in the pedigree of a 46,XX true hermaphrodite. The results of the Xga, 12E7, and G6PD segregation analysis favour the hypothesis of a preferential inactivation of the paternally derived X chromosome.     

X-chromosome inactivation in the human cytotrophoblast

Preferential paternal X-chromosome inactivation occurs in the cell lineages that differentiate first within the female rodent blastula (trophectoderm and extraembryonic endoderm). The present studies were designed to test the nature of X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) in the earliest differentiating cell lineage of the human placenta, the cytotrophoblast. Using glucose-6-phosphate-dehydrogenase (G6PD) polymorphisms as a marker system, term placentae were obtained from 13 female heterozygotes where parental allelic contributions could be determined. Chorionic villi were enzymatically digested and centrifuged in a Percoll density gradient to isolate a pure population of cytotrophoblasts, which was ascertained by cell culture, differentiation to syncytiotrophoblasts, and histochemical staining for alpha-human chorionic gonadotrophin (alpha-HCG). On electrophoresis, all 13 samples exhibited exclusive or near exclusive expression of the maternally derived X-linked enzyme variant, regardless of whether it was G6PD A or G6PD B. No intermediate bands were seen, indicating a single active G6PD locus per cell. The stromal cells of the villi, which derive from the mesoderm and differentiate later than the cytotrophoblast, exhibit random XCI. These findings establish preferential paternal XCI in the cytotrophoblast, the cell type first to differentiate within the human blastula.     

Survival of XO mouse fetuses: effect of parental origin of the X chromosome or uterine environment?

Using a recombinant product from the structurally abnormal Y chromosome, Y*, female mice with a single X of either maternal or paternal origin were generated. The two types of females were produced on the same genetic background and differ only in the origin of the X chromosome. Hence it has been possible to assess the effect of parental origin of the X on survival of females with a single X chromosome. A highly significant prenatal loss of females with a single X of paternal origin, but no comparable loss of females with a single X of maternal origin was observed. The reduced viability of females with a paternally derived X could be mediated by the parental origin of the X (i.e. X chromosome imprinting) or alternatively, since the mothers of females with a single paternally derived X have only a single X chromosome, the effect could be mediated by the genotype of the mother (i.e. maternal uterine effect).     

The development of XO gynogenetic mouse embryos

Diploid gynogenetic embryos, which have two sets of maternal and no paternal chromosomes, die at or soon after implantation. Since normal female embryos preferentially inactivate the paternally derived X chromosome in certain extraembryonic membranes, the inviability of diploid gynogenetic embryos might be due to difficulties in achieving an equivalent inactivation of one of their two maternally derived X chromosomes. In order to investigate this possibility, we constructed XO gynogenetic embryos by nuclear transplantation at the 1-cell stage. These XO gynogenones showed the same mortality around the time of implantation as did their XX gynogenetic counterparts. This shows that the lack of a paternally derived autosome set is sufficient to cause gynogenetic inviability at this stage. Autosomal imprinting and its possible relation to X-chromosome imprinting is discussed.     

Analysis of mechanisms regulating the expression of parental alleles at the GPD locus in mule erythrocytes

Erythrocyte glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) was examined by 13% starch gel electrophoresis in 74 mules (42 females and 32 males), 35 donkeys, and ten horses. The quantitative expression of the parental alleles at the Gpd locus varies greatly in female mules from the hemizygous expression of the maternal allele to that of the paternal. The data obtained indicate that the X chromosomes are randomly inactivated in female mules. No selective advantage of a cell population with a maternally (or paternally) derived X active was found in female mule erythrocytes. It is suggested that the phenotypic variability in the expression of the parental Gpd alleles is related to the random proportions established between cells having either a maternal or paternal X active in an initiator (stem) cell group giving rise to erythroid tissue. Initiator cell numbers estimated for erythroid tissue (six or seven) are close to those reported for human females and intergeneric fox hybrids. These numbers may vary depending on the duration of the time of determination and the division rate of initiator cells at determination.     

Timing of the absence of <Emphasis Type="Italic">FMR1</Emphasis> expression in full mutation chorionic villi

Fragile X syndrome is caused by the expansion of the CGG repeat in the 5' untranslated region of the FMR1 gene. This expansion leads to methylation of the FMR1 promoter region thereby blocking FMR1 protein (FMRP) expression. Prenatal diagnosis can be performed on chorionic villi samples (CVS) by Southern blot analysis. Alternatively, for males, an immunohistochemical method has been introduced for CVS. In this study, we have used this immunocytochemical method for CVS in full mutation male fetuses at different times of gestational age, varying from 10.0-12.5 weeks, and in two cases of full mutation female fetuses (>13 weeks). FMRP expression studies in CVS from full mutation male fetuses (10.0-12.5 weeks) illustrate the timing of the disappearance of FMRP expression in these CVS. Until approximately 10 weeks of gestation, FMRP is expressed normally in full mutation male CVS, whereas FMRP is completely absent at 12.5 weeks of gestation. FMRP expression in full mutation female CVS (>13 weeks) is completely absent in a number of villi, whereas other villi show normal FMRP expression. Unlabelled villi can only be present in the absence of the expression of the full mutation FMR1 gene on one X-chromosome together with the X-inactivation of the normal X allele. FMRP positive villi can be explained by an active normal X allele. The presence of both positive and negative villi indicates that X-inactivation in human CVS is a random process. No villi are found with a mixture of both FMRP-expressing and non-FMRP-expressing cells. This indicates that X-inactivation occurs very early in development, before the villi start to proliferate, and that X-inactivation in villi is a clonal process. In addition, our results indicate that the timing of both X-inactivation and full mutation FMR1 allele inactivation is different, i.e. X-inactivation occurs earlier in development than inactivation of the full mutation.     

Two maternally derived X chromosomes contribute to parthenogenetic inviability

In certain extraembryonic tissues of normal female mouse conceptuses, X-chromosome-dosage compensation is achieved by preferential inactivation of the paternally derived X. Diploid parthenogenones have two maternally derived X chromosomes, hence this mechanism cannot operate. To examine whether this contributes to the inviability of parthenogenones, XO and XX parthenogenetic eggs were constructed by pronuclear transplantation and their development assessed after transfer to pseudopregnant recipients. In one series of experiments, the frequency of postimplantation development of XO parthenogenones was much higher than that of their XX counterparts. This result is consistent with the possibility that two maternally derived X chromosomes can contribute to parthenogenetic inviability at or very soon after implantation. However, both XO and XX parthenogenones showed similar developmental abnormalities at the postimplantation stage, demonstrating that parthenogenetic inviability is ultimately determined by the possession of two sets of maternally derived autosomes.     

Identification of an Imprinted Gene Cluster in the X-Inactivation Center

Mammalian development is strongly influenced by the epigenetic phenomenon called genomic imprinting, in which either the paternal or the maternal allele of imprinted genes is expressed. Paternally expressed Xist, an imprinted gene, has been considered as a single cis-acting factor to inactivate the paternally inherited X chromosome (Xp) in preimplantation mouse embryos. This means that X-chromosome inactivation also entails gene imprinting at a very early developmental stage. However, the precise mechanism of imprinted X-chromosome inactivation remains unknown and there is little information about imprinted genes on X chromosomes. In this study, we examined whether there are other imprinted genes than Xist expressed from the inactive paternal X chromosome and expressed in female embryos at the preimplantation stage. We focused on small RNAs and compared their expression patterns between sexes by tagging the female X chromosome with green fluorescent protein. As a result, we identified two micro (mi)RNAs–miR-374-5p and miR-421-3p–mapped adjacent to Xist that were predominantly expressed in female blastocysts. Allelic expression analysis revealed that these miRNAs were indeed imprinted and expressed from the Xp. Further analysis of the imprinting status of adjacent locus led to the discovery of a large cluster of imprinted genes expressed from the Xp: Jpx, Ftx and Zcchc13. To our knowledge, this is the first identified cluster of imprinted genes in the cis-acting regulatory region termed the X-inactivation center. This finding may help in understanding the molecular mechanisms regulating imprinted X-chromosome inactivation during early mammalian development.     

Origin and evolution of X chromosome inactivation

Evolution of the mammalian sex chromosomes heavily impacts on the expression of X-encoded genes, both in marsupials and placental mammals. The loss of genes from the Y chromosome forced a two-fold upregulation of dose sensitive X-linked homologues. As a corollary, female cells would experience a lethal dose of X-linked genes, if this upregulation was not counteracted by evolution of X chromosome inactivation (XCI) that allows for only one active X chromosome per diploid genome. Marsupials rely on imprinted XCI, which inactivates always the paternally inherited X chromosome. In placental mammals, random XCI (rXCI) is the predominant form, inactivating either the maternal or paternal X. In this review, we discuss recent new insights in the regulation of XCI. Based on these findings, we propose an X inactivation center (Xic), composed of a cis-Xic and trans-Xic that encompass all elements and factors acting to control rXCI either in cis or in trans. We also highlight that XCI may have evolved from a very small nucleation site on the X chromosome in the vicinity of the Sox3 gene. Finally, we discuss the possible evolutionary road maps that resulted in imprinted XCI and rXCI as observed in present day mammals.