Coordinate control of the synthesis of ribonucleoside diphosphate reductase components in Escherichia coli.

Ribonucleoside diphosphate reductase subunits B1 and B2 and ether-permeabilized cell activities of Escherichia coli increase in parallel during thymine deprivation. Thioredoxin and thioredoxin reductase activities are not affected by thymine deprivation.     

Requirement of protein synthesis for the induction of ribonucleoside diphosphate reductase mRNA in Escherichia coli

Summary An RNA-DNA hybridization assay was used to quantitate the ribonucleoside diphosphate reductase mRNA synthesis (nrd mRNA) to show that gene expression was dependent on protein synthesis. The increased nrd mRNA synthesis induced by inhibition of DNA synthesis was eliminated by simultaneous inhibition of protein synthesis. It was further found that protein synthesis is required not only initially but continuously during DNA inhibition for increased expression of nrd mRNA synthesis.     

Mechanism of ribonucleoside diphosphate reductase from Escherichia coli. Evidence for 3'-C--H bond cleavage

Incubation of the pyrimidine [3'-3H]UDP with ribonucleotide reductase resulted in an isotope effect on the conversion to dUDP which varied as a function of pH and allosteric effectors (pH, kH/kT, effector): 6.6, 4.7, ATP; 7.6, 3.3, ATP; 7.6, 2.6, dATP; 7.6, 2.0, TTP; 8.4, 2.8, ATP. During this reaction 3H2O was also released. The lower the pH of the reaction, the larger the isotope effect, and the smaller the amount of 3H2O produced. At 50% conversion of UDP to dUDP and at pH 7.6, approximately 0.5% of total 3H present in solution was volatilized, while at pH 8.4, approximately 0.9% was volatilized. Similar experiments in which the purine [3'-3H]ADP was incubated with ribonucleotide reductase also resulted in an isotope effect on its conversion to dATP which varied as a function of pH (pH, kH/kT with dGTP as an effector); 6.6, 1.9; 7.6, 1.7; 8.6, 1.4. Furthermore, 3H2O was also released as a function of the extent of the reaction. At 50% turnover and pH 7.6, approximately 0.6% of 3H2O was volatilized, while at pH 8.6 approximately 1.25% was released. Two control experiments in which either the B1 subunit of ribonucleotide reductase was inactivated with 2'-chloro-2'-deoxyuridine 5'-diphosphate or the B2 subunit of ribonucleotide reductase was inactivated with 2'-azido-2'-deoxyuridine 5'-diphosphate and then the enzyme incubated with [3'-3H]ADP or [3'-3H]UDP indicated that in neither case was 3H released. Both B1 and B2 subunits are required for cleavage of the 3'-C--H bond. Incubation of [3'-3H]dADP or [3'-3H]dUDP with ribonucleotide reductase produced no measurable release of 3H. These data clearly indicate that conversion of a purine or pyrimidine diphosphate to a deoxynucleotide diphosphate by Escherichia coli ribonucleotide reductase requires cleavage of the 3'-C--H bond of the substrate. The fate of the 3'-H of the substrate was also determined. Incubation of [3'-2H]UDP with ribonucleotide reductase resulted in the production of [3'-2H]dUDP.     

PriA-directed replication fork restart in Escherichia coli

The encounter of a replication fork with either a damaged DNA template, a nick in the template strand or a 'frozen' protein-DNA complex can stall the replisome and cause it to fall apart. Such an event generates a requirement for replication fork restart if the cell is going to survive. Recent evidence shows that replication fork restart is effected by the action of the recombination proteins generating a substrate for PriA-directed replication fork assembly.     

Escherichia coli DinB inhibits replication fork progression without significantly inducing the SOS response

The SOS response is readily triggered by replication fork stalling caused by DNA damage or a dysfunctional replicative apparatus in Escherichia coli cells. E. coli dinB encodes DinB DNA polymerase and its expression is upregulated during the SOS response. DinB catalyzes translesion DNA synthesis in place of a replicative DNA polymerase III that is stalled at a DNA lesion. We showed previously that DNA replication was suppressed without exogenous DNA damage in cells overproducing DinB. In this report, we confirm that this was due to a dose-dependent inhibition of ongoing replication forks by DinB. Interestingly, the DinB-overproducing cells did not significantly induce the SOS response even though DNA replication was perturbed. RecA protein is activated by forming a nucleoprotein filament with single-stranded DNA, which leads to the onset of the SOS response. In the DinB-overproducing cells, RecA was not activated to induce the SOS response. However, the SOS response was observed after heat-inducible activation in strain recA441 (encoding a temperature-sensitive RecA) and after replication blockage in strain dnaE486 (encoding a temperature-sensitive catalytic subunit of the replicative DNA polymerase III) at a non-permissive temperature when DinB was overproduced in these cells. Furthermore, since catalytically inactive DinB could avoid the SOS response to a DinB-promoted fork block, it is unlikely that overproduced DinB takes control of primer extension and thus limits single-stranded DNA. These observations suggest that DinB possesses a feature that suppresses DNA replication but does not abolish the cell's capacity to induce the SOS response. We conclude that DinB impedes replication fork progression in a way that does not activate RecA, in contrast to obstructive DNA lesions and dysfunctional replication machinery.     

Mechanisms of replication fork restart in Escherichia coli

Replication of the genome is crucial for the accurate transmission of genetic information. It has become clear over the last decade that the orderly progression of replication forks in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes is disrupted with high frequency by encounters with various obstacles either on or in the template strands. Survival of the organism then becomes dependent on both removal of the obstruction and resumption of replication. This latter point is particularly important in bacteria, where the number of replication forks per genome is nominally only two. Replication restart in Escherichia coli is accomplished by the action of the restart primosomal proteins, which use both recombination intermediates and stalled replication forks as substrates for loading new replication forks. These reactions have been reconstituted with purified recombination and replication proteins.     

Regulation of the synthesis of ribonucleoside diphosphate reductase in Escherichia coli: specific activity of the enzyme in relationship to perturbations of DNA replication.

Ribonucleoside diphosphate reductase (RDP reductase) activity was found to greatly increase after a shift to the nonpermissive temperature in Escherichia coli mutants temperature sensitive for DNA elongation (dnaE dnaG dnaZ lig) or DNA initiation (dnaA dnaC dnaI). However, the kinetics of increase in RDP reductase after a shift to nonpermissive conditions were significantly different in initiation-defective mutants compared with elongation-defective mutants. In strains without defects in DNA metabolism, the specific activity of RDP reductase was found to increase with increasing growth rate. Nutritional shifts to faster growth conditions caused cells to transiently overproduce RDP reductase before adjusting to the new steady-state conditions.     

Maintaining replication fork integrity in UV-irradiated Escherichia coli cells

In dividing cells, the stalling of replication fork complexes by impediments to DNA unwinding or by template imperfections that block synthesis by the polymerase subunits is a serious threat to genomic integrity and cell viability. What happens to stalled forks depends on the nature of the offending obstacle. In UV-irradiated Escherichia coli cells DNA synthesis is delayed for a considerable period, during which forks undergo extensive processing before replication can resume. Thus, restart depends on factors needed to load the replicative helicase, indicating that the replisome may have dissociated. It also requires the RecFOR proteins, which are known to load RecA recombinase on single-stranded DNA, implying that template strands are exposed. To gain a further understanding of how UV irradiation affects replication and how replication resumes after a block, we used fluorescence microscopy and BrdU or radioisotope labelling to examine chromosome replication and cell cycle progression. Our studies confirm that RecFOR promote efficient reactivation of stalled forks and demonstrate that they are also needed for productive replication initiated at the origin, or triggered elsewhere by damage to the DNA. Although delayed, all modes of replication do recover in the absence of these proteins, but nascent DNA strands are degraded more extensively by RecJ exonuclease. However, these strands are also degraded in the presence of RecFOR when restart is blocked by other means, indicating that RecA loading is not sufficient to stabilise and protect the fork. This is consistent with the idea that RecA actively promotes restart. Thus, in contrast to eukaryotic cells, there may be no factor in bacterial cells acting specifically to stabilise stalled forks. Instead, nascent strands may be protected by the simple expedient of promoting restart. We also report that the efficiency of fork reactivation is not affected in polB mutants.     

Products of the inactivation of ribonucleoside diphosphate reductase from Escherichia coli with 2'-azido-2'-deoxyuridine 5'-diphosphate

Ribonucleoside diphosphate reductase (RDPR) from Escherichia coli was completely inactivated by 1 equiv of the mechanism-based inhibitor 2'-azido-2'-deoxyuridine 5'-diphosphate (N3UDP). Incubation of RDPR with [3'-3H]N3UDP resulted in 0.2 mol of 3H released to solvent per mole of enzyme inactivated, indicating that cleavage of the 3' carbon-hydrogen bond occurred in the reaction. Incubation of RDPR with [beta-32P]N3UDP resulted in stoichiometric production of inorganic pyrophosphate. One equivalent of uracil was eliminated from N3UDP, but no azide release was detected. Analysis of the reaction of RDPR with [15N3]N3UDP by mass spectrometry revealed that the azide moiety was converted to 0.9 mol of nitrogen gas per mole of enzyme inactivated. The tyrosyl radical of the B2 subunit was destroyed during the inactivation by N3UDP as reported previously [Sj?berg, B.-M., Gr?slund, A., & Eckstein, F. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258, 8060-8067], while the specific activity of the B1 subunit was reduced by half. Incubation of [5'-3H]N3UDP with RDPR resulted in stoichiometric covalent radiolabeling of the enzyme. Separation of the enzyme's subunits by chromatofocusing revealed that the modification was specific for the B1 subunit.     

RMI1 promotes DNA replication fork progression and recovery from replication fork stress

RMI1 is a member of an evolutionarily conserved complex composed of BLM and topoisomerase IIIα (TopoIIIα). This complex exhibits strand passage activity in vitro, which is likely important for DNA repair and DNA replication in vivo. The inactivation of RMI1 causes genome instability, including elevated levels of sister chromatid exchange and accelerated tumorigenesis. Using molecular combing to analyze DNA replication at the single-molecule level, we show that RMI1 is required to promote normal replication fork progression. The fork progression defect in RMI1-depleted cells is alleviated in cells lacking BLM, indicating that RMI1 functions downstream of BLM in promoting replication elongation. RMI1 localizes to subnuclear foci with BLM and TopoIIIα in response to replication stress. The proper localization of the complex requires a BLM-TopoIIIα-RMI1 interaction and is essential for RMI1 to promote recovery from replication stress. These findings reveal direct roles of RMI1 in DNA replication and the replication stress response, which could explain the molecular basis for its involvement in suppressing sister chromatid exchange and tumorigenesis.     

Features of replication fork blockage by the Escherichia coli terminus-binding protein.

Blockage of the progress of a DNA replication fork in Escherichia coli can be ascribed to an inhibition of helicase action at the orientation-specific binding of a termination sequence (ter) by the ter-binding protein (Lee, E.H., Kornberg, A., Hidaka, M., Kobayashi, T., and Horiuchi, T. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 86, 9104-9108). These observations have been extended to include the PriA helicase, thus confirming that blockage is general for helicases. The site of arrest of synthesis by a replication fork is at the very first nucleotide of the 22-base pair E. coli-terB sequence. Strand displacement by DNA polymerases is also inhibited, but is less profound and is orientation-specific. The ter sequences of plasmids R1-terR and -terL and of plasmids R6K and R100 have been compared with those of E. coli-terA and -terB.     

Recombinase and translesion DNA polymerase decrease the speed of replication fork progression during the DNA damage response in Escherichia coli cells

The SOS response is a DNA damage response pathway that serves as a general safeguard of genome integrity in bacteria. Extensive studies of the SOS response in Escherichia coli have contributed to establishing the key concepts of cellular responses to DNA damage. However, how the SOS response impacts on the dynamics of DNA replication fork movement remains unknown. We found that inducing the SOS response decreases the mean speed of individual replication forks by 30–50% in E. coli cells, leading to a 20–30% reduction in overall DNA synthesis. dinB and recA belong to a group of genes that are upregulated during the SOS response, and encode the highly conserved proteins DinB (also known as DNA polymerase IV) and RecA, which, respectively, specializes in translesion DNA synthesis and functions as the central recombination protein. Both genes were independently responsible for the SOS-dependent slowdown of replication fork progression. Furthermore, fork speed was reduced when each gene was ectopically expressed in SOS-uninduced cells to the levels at which they are expressed in SOS-induced cells. These results clearly indicate that the increased expression of dinB and recA performs a novel role in restraining the progression of an unperturbed replication fork during the SOS response.