Structural investigations of recombinant urokinase growth factor-like domain

Urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) is a serine protease that converts the plasminogen zymogen into the enzymatically active plasmin. uPA is synthesized and secreted as the single-chain molecule (scuPA) composed of an N-terminal domain (GFD) and kringle (KD) and C-terminal proteolytic (PD) domains. Earlier, the structure of ATF (which consists of GFD and KD) was solved by NMR (A. P. Hansen et al. (1994) Biochemistry, 33, 4847–4864) and by X-ray crystallography alone and in a complex with the soluble form of the urokinase receptor (uPAR, CD87) lacking GPI (C. Barinka et al. (2006) J. Mol. Biol., 363, 482–495). According to these data, GFD contains two β-sheet regions oriented perpendicularly to each other. The area in the GFD responsible for binding to uPAR is localized in the flexible Ω-loop, which consists of seven amino acid residues connecting two strings of antiparallel β-sheet. It was shown by site-directed mutagenesis that shortening of the Ω-loop length by one amino acid residue leads to the inability of GFD to bind to uPAR (V. Magdolen et al. (1996) Eur. J. Biochem., 237, 743–751). Here we show that, in contrast to the above-mentioned studies, we found no sign of the β-sheet regions in GFD in our uPA preparations either free or in a complex with uPAR. The GFD seems to be a rather flexible and unstructured domain, demonstrating in spite of its apparent flexibility highly specific interaction with uPAR both in vitro and in cell culture experiments. Circular dichroism, tryptophan fluorescence during thermal denaturation of the protein, and heteronuclear NMR spectroscopy of ¹⁵N/¹³C-labeled ATF both free and in complex with urokinase receptor were used to judge the secondary structure of GFD of uPA.     

The effects of vitronectin on specific interactions between urokinase-type plasminogen activator and its receptor: ab initio molecular orbital calculations

Binding of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) to its receptor (uPAR) on the surface of a cancer cell is considered to be a trigger for starting cancer invasions. In addition, the somatomedin B (SMB) domain of vitronectin binds simultaneously to uPAR to construct a ternary complex of uPAR–uPA–SMB. Here we present stable structures of the solvated complexes of uPAR–uPA and uPAR–uPA–SMB obtained by classical molecular mechanics simulations, and the specific interactions between uPAR, uPA and SMB are investigated by ab initio fragment molecular orbital calculations. The result indicates that the SMB binding enhances the binding affinity between uPAR and uPA, although there is no direct contact between SMB and uPA. In particular, the specific interaction between uPAR and the Lys36 residue of uPA is significantly affected by the SMB binding. The positively charged Lys23, Lys46 and Lys61 residues of uPA have strong attractive interactions to uPAR in both the uPAR–uPA and uPAR–uPA–SMB complexes, demonstrating the importance of these residues in the specific binding between uPAR and uPA. The current results on the specific interactions are informative for proposing potent antagonists, which block the uPA and SMB bindings to uPAR.     

Peptide-Based Optical uPAR Imaging for Surgery: In Vivo Testing of ICG-Glu-Glu-AE105

Near infrared intra-operative optical imaging is an emerging technique with clear implications for improved cancer surgery by enabling a more distinct delineation of the tumor margins during resection. This modality has the potential to increase the number of patients having a curative radical tumor resection. In the present study, a new uPAR-targeted fluorescent probe was developed and the in vivo applicability was evaluated in a human xenograft mouse model. Most human carcinomas express high level of uPAR in the tumor-stromal interface of invasive lesions and uPAR is therefore considered an ideal target for intra-operative imaging. Conjugation of the flourophor indocyanine green (ICG) to the uPAR agonist (AE105) provides an optical imaging ligand with sufficiently high receptor affinity to allow for a specific receptor targeting in vivo. For in vivo testing, human glioblastoma xenograft mice were subjected to optical imaging after i.v. injection of ICG-AE105, which provided an optimal contrast in the time window 6–24 h post injection. Specificity of the uPAR-targeting probe ICG-AE105 was demonstrated in vivo by 1) no uptake of unconjugated ICG after 15 hours, 2) inhibition of ICG-AE105 tumor uptake by a bolus injection of the natural uPAR ligand pro-uPA, and finally 3) the histological colocalization of ICG-AE105 fluorescence and immunohistochemical detected human uPAR on resected tumor slides. Taken together, our data supports the potential use of this probe for intra-operative optical guidance in cancer surgery to ensure complete removal of tumors while preserving adjacent, healthy tissue.     

Is plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 the molecular switch that governs urokinase receptor-mediated cell adhesion and release?

Induction of the urokinase type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) promotes cell adhesion through its interaction with vitronectin (VN) in the extracellular matrix, and facilitates cell migration and invasion by localizing uPA to the cell surface. We provide evidence that this balance between cell adhesion and cell detachment is governed by PA inhibitor-1 (PAI-1). First, we demonstrate that uPAR and PAI-1 bind to the same site in VN (i.e., the amino-terminal somatomedin B domain; SMB), and that PAI-1 competes with uPAR for binding to SMB. Domain swapping and mutagenesis studies indicate that the uPAR-binding sequence is located within the central region of the SMB domain, a region previously shown to contain the PAI-1-binding motif. Second, we show that PAI-1 dissociates bound VN from uPAR and detaches U937 cells from their VN substratum. This PAI-1 mediated release of cells from VN appears to occur independently of its ability to function as a protease inhibitor, and may help to explain why high PAI-1 levels indicate a poor prognosis for many cancers. Finally, we show that uPA can rapidly reverse this effect of PAI-1. Taken together, these results suggest a dynamic regulatory role for PAI-1 and uPA in uPAR-mediated cell adhesion and release.     

Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 regulates cell adhesion by binding to the somatomedin B domain of vitronectin

Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) binds to the somatomedin B (SMB) domain of vitronectin. It inhibits the adhesion of U937 cells to vitronectin by competing with the urokinase receptor (uPAR; CD87) on these cells for binding to the same domain. Although the inhibitor also blocks integrin-mediated cell adhesion, the molecular basis of this effect is unclear. In this study, the effect of the inhibitor on the adhesion of a variety of cells (e.g., U937, MCF7, HT-1080, and HeLa) to vitronectin was assessed, and the importance of the SMB domain in these interactions was determined. Although PAI-1 blocked the adhesion of all of these cells to vitronectin-coated wells, it did not block adhesion to a variant of vitronectin which lacked the SMB domain. Interestingly, HT-1080 and U937 cells attached avidly to microtiter wells coated with purified recombinant SMB (which does not contain the RGD sequence), and this adhesion was again blocked by the inhibitor. These results affirm that PAI-1 can inhibit both uPAR- and integrin-mediated cell adhesion, and demonstrate that the SMB domain of vitronectin is required for these effects. They also show that multiple cell types can employ uPAR as an adhesion receptor. The use of purified recombinant SMB should help to further define this novel adhesive pathway, and to delineate its relationship with integrin-mediated adhesive events.     

Chemotactic Effect of Urokinase Plasminogen Activator: a Major Role for Mechanisms Independent of Its Proteolytic or Growth Factor Domains

Abstract

Urokinase type plasminogen activator (uPA) converts plasminogen to plasmin and is highly chemotactic for many cell types. We examined, using recombinant wild type and mutated forms of uPA, the extent to which its proteolytic properties, its growth-like domain (GFD) and/or interactions with the specific receptor (uPAR) contribute to the chemotactic activity towards vascular smooth muscle cells (SMC). Recombinant wild type uPA (r-uPA) stimulated cell migration nearly 5,8-fold, inactive r-uPA, with a mutation in the catalitic domain (r-uPA(H/Q)), 3-fold, uPA without growth factor like domain (r-uPA(GFD)), 2.6-fold, and a form containing both mutations (r-uPA(H/Q, GFD), 3.3-fold. All recombinant forms of uPA, wild type and those with mutations were equally and highly effective (IC₅～20 nM) in displacing ¹²⁵I-r-uPA bound to SMC. These results indicate that additional mechanisms, not dependent on uPA's proteolytic activity or the binding ability of its GFD to uPAR, are the major contributors to its chemotactic action on SMC     

Chemotactic effect of urokinase plasminogen activator: a major role for mechanisms independent of its proteolytic or growth factor domains.

Urokinase type plasminogen activator (uPA) converts plasminogen to plasmin and is highly chemotactic for many cell types. We examined, using recombinant wild type and mutated forms of uPA, the extent to which its proteolytic properties, its growth-like domain (GFD) and/or interactions with the specific receptor (uPAR) contribute to the chemotactic activity towards vascular smooth muscle cells (SMC). Recombinant wild type uPA (r-uPA) stimulated cell migration nearly 5.8-fold, inactive r-uPA, with a mutation in the catalitic domain (r-uPA(H/Q)), 3-fold, uPA without growth factor like domain (r-uPA(GFD )), 2.6-fold, and a form containing both mutations (r-uPA(H/Q, GFD ), 3.3-fold. All recombinant forms of uPA, wild type and those with mutations were equally and highly effective (IC50 approximately 20 nM) in displacing 125I-r-uPA bound to SMC. These results indicate that additional mechanisms, not dependent on uPA's proteolytic activity or the binding ability of its GFD to uPAR, are the major contributors to its chemotactic action on SMC.     

Targeting and sensing cancer cells with ZnO nanoprobes in vitro

A new class of zinc oxide quantum dots (ZnO QDs) was investigated as nanoprobes for targeting cancer cells in vitro. ZnO nanoparticles were synthesized using conventional sol–gel method and encapsulated using trimethoxy aminopropyl silane. Transferrin, the ligand targeting the cancer cells, was conjugated to the ZnO QDs. In vitro imaging studies using MDA-MB-231 showed the biocompatible ZnO nanoprobe selectively binding to the cell surface receptor and internalizing through receptor-mediated endocytosis. Time-lapsed photobleaching studies indicate the ZnO QDs to be resistant to photobleaching, making them suitable for long term imaging purpose. Investigation of the ZnO nanoprobe as a platform for sensitive bioassays indicates that it can be used as an alternative fluoroprobe for cancer cell targeting and sensing applications.     

Human gastric carcinoma cells targeting peptide-functionalized iron oxide nanoparticles delivery for magnetic resonance imaging

Iron oxide nanoparticles (IONPs) are broadly examined nanomaterials for their promising engagement of the progressive in biomedical application, for intense selective drug delivery and multimodal imaging. IONPs are commonly less price, and enhanced biocompatibility can be effectively functionalized with a broad range of functioning ligand, and have established to be active in improving clinical diagnostics tools and magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents. Consequently, IONPs could be used as a promising magnetic resonance imaging contrast. In this context, we have established an IONPs based framework for the multimodal in vitro imaging approach of gastric cancer cell lines that fast high level of glypican-3 protein (GLY-3) on the superficial. In this regards, a new GLY-3 peptide targeting model established and fabricated to IONPs. The aqueous property, biocompatibility profile and physical-chemical properties of the functionalized IONPs were characterised with various spectroscopical methods. The viability of the gastric SGC-7901 cells was examined by MTT assay. Further, the viability of the cells was evidenced through fluorescence staining methods. The binding ability and cellular uptake properties of naked IONPs and functionalized IONPs (GPC3@IONPs) were examined via laser scanning confocal microscopy (CLSM) in GLY-3 positive gastric cells (SGC-7901 cells). The obtained outcomes displayed that the GLY-3 functionalized IONPs remarkably improved the magnetic resonance imaging contrasts and were actively assured and occupied up by gastric cell lines without damaging the non-cancerous cells.     

Kinetic analysis of the interaction between vitronectin and the urokinase receptor.

Although the urokinase receptor (uPAR) binds to vitronectin (VN) and promotes the adhesion of cells to this matrix protein, the biochemical details of this interaction remain unclear. VN variants were employed in BIAcore experiments to examine the uPAR-VN interaction in detail and to compare it to the interaction of VN with other ligands. Heparin and plasminogen bound to VN fragments containing the heparin-binding domain, indicating that this domain was functionally active in the recombinant peptides. However, no significant binding was detected when uPAR was incubated with this domain, and neither heparin nor plasminogen competed with it for binding to VN. In fact, uPAR only bound to fragments containing the somatomedin B (SMB) domain, and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that bind to this domain competed with uPAR for binding to VN. Monoclonal antibody 8E6 also inhibited uPAR binding to VN, and this mAb was shown to recognize sulfated tyrosine residues 56 and 59 in the region adjacent to the SMB domain. Destruction of this site by acid treatment eliminated mAb 8E6 binding but had no effect on uPAR binding. Thus, there appears to be a single binding site for uPAR in VN, and it is located in the SMB domain and is distinct from the epitope recognized by mAb 8E6. Inhibition of uPAR binding to VN by mAb 8E6 probably results from steric hindrance.     

The uPA receptor and the somatomedin B region of vitronectin direct the localization of uPA to focal adhesions in microvessel endothelial cells.

Vitronectin is a plasma protein which can deposit into the extracellular matrix where it supports integrin and uPA dependent cell migration. In earlier studies, we have shown that the plasma protein, vitronectin, stimulates focal adhesion remodeling by recruiting urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) to focal adhesion sites [Wilcox-Adelman, S. A., Wilkins-Port, C. E., McKeown-Longo, P. J., 2000. Localization of urokinase-type plasminogen activator to focal adhesions requires ligation of vitronectin integrin receptors. Cell. Adhes. Commun.7, 477-490]. In the present study, we used a variety of vitronectin constructs to demonstrate that the localization of uPA to adhesion sites requires the binding of both vitronectin integrin receptors and the uPA receptor (uPAR) to vitronectin. A recombinant fragment of vitronectin containing the connecting sequence (VN(CS)) was able to support integrin-dependent adhesion, spreading and focal adhesion assembly by human microvessel endothelial cells. Cells adherent to this fragment were not able to localize uPA to focal adhesions. A second recombinant fragment containing both the amino-terminal SMB domain and the CS domain was able to restore the localization of uPA to adhesion sites. This fragment, which contains a uPAR binding site, also resulted in the localization of uPAR to adhesion sites. uPAR blocking antibodies as well as phospholipase C treatment of cells inhibited uPA localization to adhesion sites confirming a role for uPAR in this process. The SMB domain alone was unable to direct either uPAR or uPA to adhesion sites in the absence of the CS domain. Our results indicate that vitronectin-dependent localization of uPA to adhesion sites requires the sequential binding of vitronectin integrins and uPAR to vitronectin.     

Critical role of integrin alpha 5 beta 1 in urokinase (uPA)/urokinase receptor (uPAR,CD87) signaling

Urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) induces cell adhesion and chemotactic movement. uPA signaling requires its binding to uPA receptor (uPAR/CD87), but how glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored uPAR mediates signaling is unclear. uPAR is a ligand for several integrins (e.g. alpha 5 beta 1) and supports cell-cell interaction by binding to integrins on apposing cells (in trans). We studied whether binding of uPAR to alpha 5 beta 1 in cis is involved in adhesion and migration of Chinese hamster ovary cells in response to immobilized uPA. This process was temperature-sensitive and required mitogen-activated protein kinase activation. Anti-uPAR antibody or depletion of uPAR blocked, whereas overexpression of uPAR enhanced, cell adhesion to uPA. Adhesion to uPA was also blocked by deletion of the growth factor domain (GFD) of uPA and by anti-GFD antibody, whereas neither the isolated uPA kringle nor serine protease domain supported adhesion directly. Interestingly, anti-alpha 5 antibody, RGD peptide, and function-blocking mutations in alpha 5 beta 1 blocked adhesion to uPA. uPA-induced cell migration also required GFD, uPAR, and alpha 5 beta 1, but alpha 5 beta 1 alone did not support uPA-induced adhesion and migration. Thus, binding of uPA causes uPAR to act as a ligand for alpha 5 beta 1 to induce cell adhesion, intracellular signaling, and cell migration. We demonstrated that uPA induced RGD-dependent binding of uPAR to alpha 5 beta 1 in solution. These results suggest that uPA-induced adhesion and migration of Chinese hamster ovary cells occurs as a consequence of (a) uPA binding to uPAR through GFD, (b) the subsequent binding of a uPA.uPAR complex to alpha 5 beta 1 via uPAR, and (c) signal transduction through alpha 5 beta 1.     

Crystal structure of the urokinase receptor in a ligand-free form

The urokinase receptor urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) is a surface receptor capable of not only focalizing urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA)-mediated fibrinolysis to the pericellular micro-environment but also promoting cell migration and chemotaxis. Consistent with this multifunctional role, uPAR binds several extracellular ligands, including uPA and vitronectin. Structural studies suggest that uPAR possesses structural flexibility. It is, however, not clear whether this flexibility is an inherent property of the uPAR structure per se or whether it is induced upon ligand binding. The crystal structure of human uPAR in its ligand-free state would clarify this issue, but such information remains unfortunately elusive. We now report the crystal structures of a stabilized, human uPAR (H47C/N259C) in its ligand-free form to 2.4 Å and in complex with amino-terminal fragment (ATF) to 3.2 Å. The structure of uPAR^H47C/N259C in complex with ATF resembles the wild-type uPAR·ATF complex, demonstrating that these mutations do not perturb the uPA binding properties of uPAR. The present structure of uPAR^H47C/N259C provides the first structural definition of uPAR in its ligand-free form, which represents one of the biologically active conformations of uPAR as defined by extensive biochemical studies. The domain boundary between uPAR DI–DII domains is more flexible than the DII–DIII domain boundary. Two important structural features are highlighted by the present uPAR structure. First, the DI–DIII domain boundary may face the cell membrane. Second, loop 130–140 of uPAR plays a dynamic role during ligand loading/unloading. Together, these studies provide new insights into uPAR structure–function relationships, emphasizing the importance of the inter-domain dynamics of this modular receptor.     

Dynamics of urokinase receptor interaction with Peptide antagonists studied by amide hydrogen exchange and mass spectrometry

Using amide hydrogen exchange combined with electrospray ionization mass spectrometry, we have in this study determined the number of amide hydrogens on several peptides that become solvent-inaccessible as a result of their high-affinity interaction with the urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR). These experiments reveal that at least six out of eight amide hydrogens in a synthetic nine-mer peptide antagonist (AE105) become sequestered upon engagement in uPAR binding. Various uPAR mutants with decreased affinity for this peptide antagonist gave similar results, thereby indicating that deletion of the favorable interactions involving the side chains of these residues in uPAR does not affect the number of hydrogen bonds established by the main chain of the peptide ligand. The isolated growth factor-like domain (GFD) of the cognate serine protease ligand for uPAR showed 11 protected amide hydrogens in the receptor complex. Interestingly, a naturally occurring O-linked fucose on Thr(18) confers protection of two additional amide hydrogens in GFD when it forms a complex with uPAR. Dissociation of the uPAR-peptide complexes is accompanied by a correlated exchange of nearly all amide hydrogens on the peptide ligand. This yields bimodal isotope patterns from which dissociation rate constants can be determined. In addition, the distinct bimodal isotope distributions also allow investigation of the exchange kinetics of receptor-bound peptides providing information about the local structural motions at the interface. These exchange experiments therefore provide both structural and kinetic information on the interaction between uPAR and these small peptide antagonists, which in model systems show promise as inhibitors of intravasation of human cancer cells.     

Internalization of the urokinase-plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 complex is mediated by the urokinase receptor.

The role of the urokinase receptor (uPAR) in the internalization of the urokinase-plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 (uPA.PAI-1) complex has been investigated. First, exploiting the species specificity of uPA binding, we show that mouse LB6 cells (that express a mouse uPAR) were unable to bind or degrade the human uPA.PAI-1 complex. On the other hand, LB6 clone 19 cells, which express a transfected human uPAR, degraded uPA.PAI-1 complexes with kinetics identical to the human monocytic U937 cells. We also show by immunofluorescence experiments with anti-uPA antibodies that in LB6 clone 19 cells, the uPA.PAI-1 complex is indeed internalized. While at 4 degrees C uPA fluorescence was visible at the cell surface, shift of the temperature to 37 degrees C caused a displacement of the immunoreactivity to the cytoplasmic compartment, with a pattern indicating lysosomal localization. If uPA.PAI-1 internalization/degradation is mediated by uPAR, inhibition of uPA.PAI-1 binding to uPAR should block degradation. Three different treatments, competition with the agonist amino-terminal fragment of uPA, treatment with a monoclonal antibody directed toward the binding domain of uPAR or release of uPAR from the cell surface with phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C completely prevented uPA.PAI-1 degradation. The possibility that a serpin-enzyme complex receptor might be primarily or secondarily involved in the internalization process was excluded since a serpin-enzyme complex peptide failed to inhibit uPA.PAI-1 binding and degradation. Similarly, complexes of PAI-1 with low molecular mass uPA (33 kDa uPA), which lacks the uPAR binding domain, were neither bound nor degraded. Finally we also show that treatment of cells with uPA.PAI-1 complex caused a specific but partial down-regulation of uPAR. A similar result was obtained when PAI-1 was allowed to complex to uPA that had been previously bound to the receptor. The possibility therefore exists that the entire complex uPA.PAI-1-uPAR is internalized. All these data allow us to conclude that internalization of the uPA.PAI-1 complex is mediated by uPAR.     

Mapping part of the functional epitope for ligand binding on the receptor for urokinase-type plasminogen activator by site-directed mutagenesis

The urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) is a glycolipid anchored multidomain member of the Ly-6/uPAR protein domain superfamily. Studies by site-directed photoaffinity labeling, chemical cross-linking, and ligand-induced protection against chemical modification have highlighted the possible involvement of uPAR domain I and particularly loop 3 thereof in ligand binding (Ploug, M. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 16494-16505). Guided by these results we have now performed an alanine scanning analysis of this region in uPAR by site-directed mutagenesis and subsequently measured the effects thereof on the kinetics of uPA binding in real-time by surface plasmon resonance. Only four positions in loop 3 of uPAR domain I exhibited significant changes in the contribution to the free energy of uPA binding (DeltaDeltaG >/= 1.3 kcal mol(-1)) upon single-site substitutions to alanine (i.e. Arg(53), Leu(55), Tyr(57), and Leu(66)). The energetic impact of these four alanine substitutions was not caused by gross structural perturbations, since all monoclonal antibodies tested having conformation-dependent epitopes on this domain exhibited unaltered binding kinetics. These sites together with a three-dimensional structure for uPAR may provide an appropriate target for rational drug design aimed at developing new receptor binding antagonists with potential application in cancer therapy.     

Solution structure of recombinant somatomedin B domain from vitronectin produced in Pichia pastoris

The cysteine-rich somatomedin B domain (SMB) of the matrix protein vitronectin is involved in several important biological processes. First, it stabilizes the active conformation of the plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-1); second, it provides the recognition motif for cell adhesion via the cognate integrins (alpha(v)beta(3), alpha(v)beta(5), and alpha(IIb)beta(3)); and third, it binds the complex between urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its glycolipid-anchored receptor (uPAR). Previous structural studies on SMB have used recombinant protein expressed in Escherichia coli or SMB released from plasma-derived vitronectin by CNBr cleavage. However, different disulfide patterns and three-dimensional structures for SMB were reported. In the present study, we have expressed recombinant human SMB by two different eukaryotic expression systems, Pichia pastoris and Drosophila melanogaster S2-cells, both yielding structurally and functionally homogeneous protein preparations. Importantly, the entire population of our purified, recombinant SMB has a solvent exposure, both as a free domain and in complex with PAI-1, which is indistinguishable from that of plasma-derived SMB as assessed by amide hydrogen ((1)H/(2)H) exchange. This solvent exposure was only reproduced by one of three synthetic SMB products with predefined disulfide connectivities corresponding to those published previously. Furthermore, this connectivity was also the only one to yield a folded and functional domain. The NMR structure was determined for free SMB produced by Pichia and is largely consistent with that solved by X-ray crystallography for SMB in complex with PAI-1.     

Intracellular modifiers of integrin alpha 6p production in aggressive prostate and breast cancer cell lines

Cancer metastasis is a multi-step process in which tumor cells gain the ability to invade beyond the primary tumor and colonize distant sites. The mechanisms regulating the metastatic process confer changes to cell adhesion receptors including the integrin family of receptors. Our group previously discovered that the α6 integrin (ITGA6/CD49f) is post translationally modified by urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) and its receptor, urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR), to form the variant ITGA6p. This variant of ITGA6 is a cleaved form of the receptor that lacks the ligand-binding domain. Although it is established that the uPA/uPAR axis drives ITGA6 cleavage, the mechanisms regulating cleavage have not been defined. Intracellular integrin dependent “inside-out” signaling is a major regulator of integrin function and the uPA/uPAR axis. We hypothesized that intracellular signaling molecules play a role in formation of ITGA6p to promote cell migration during cancer metastasis. In order to test our hypothesis, DU145 and PC3B1 prostate cancer and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell lines were treated with small interfering RNA targeting actin and the intracellular signaling regulators focal adhesion kinase (FAK), integrin linked kinase (ILK), and paxillin. The results demonstrated that inhibition of actin, FAK, and ILK expression resulted in significantly increased uPAR expression and ITGA6p production. Inhibition of actin increased ITGA6p, although inhibition of paxillin did not affect ITGA6p formation. Taken together, these results suggest that FAK and ILK dependent “inside-out” signaling, and actin dynamics regulate extracellular production of ITGA6p and the aggressive phenotype.     

A Flexible Multidomain Structure Drives the Function of the Urokinase-type Plasminogen Activator Receptor (uPAR)

The urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) provides a rendezvous between proteolytic degradation of the extracellular matrix and integrin-mediated adhesion to vitronectin. These processes are, however, tightly linked because the high affinity binding of urokinase regulates the binding of uPAR to matrix-embedded vitronectin. Although crystal structures exist to define the corresponding static bi- and trimolecular receptor complexes, it is evident that the dynamic property of uPAR plays a decisive role in its function. In the present study, we combine small angle x-ray scattering, hydrogen-deuterium exchange, and surface plasmon resonance to develop a structural model describing the allosteric regulation of uPAR. We show that the flexibility of its N-terminal domain provides the key for understanding this allosteric mechanism. Importantly, our model has direct implications for understanding uPAR-assisted cell adhesion and migration as well as for translational research, including targeted intervention therapy and non-invasive tumor imaging in vivo.     

Disulfide bonding arrangements in active forms of the somatomedin B domain of human vitronectin

The N-terminal cysteine-rich somatomedin B (SMB) domain (residues 1-44) of the human glycoprotein vitronectin contains the high-affinity binding sites for plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) and the urokinase receptor (uPAR). We previously showed that the eight cysteine residues of recombinant SMB (rSMB) are organized into four disulfide bonds in a linear uncrossed pattern (Cys(5)-Cys(9), Cys(19)-Cys(21), Cys(25)-Cys(31), and Cys(32)-Cys(39)). In the present study, we use an alternative method to show that this disulfide bond arrangement remains a major preferred one in solution, and we determine the solution structure of the domain using NMR analysis. The solution structure shows that the four disulfide bonds are tightly packed in the center of the domain, replacing the traditional hydrophobic core expected for a globular protein. The few noncysteine hydrophobic side chains form a cluster on the outside of the domain, providing a distinctive binding surface for the physiological partners PAI-1 and uPAR. The hydrophobic surface consists mainly of side chains from the loop formed by the Cys(25)-Cys(31) disulfide bond, and is surrounded by conserved acidic and basic side chains, which are likely to contribute to the specificity of the intermolecular interactions of this domain. Interestingly, the overall fold of the molecule is compatible with several arrangements of the disulfide bonds. A number of different disulfide bond arrangements were able to satisfy the NMR restraints, and an extensive series of conformational energy calculations performed in explicit solvent confirmed that several disulfide bond arrangements have comparable stabilization energies. An experimental demonstration of the presence of alternative disulfide conformations in active rSMB is provided by the behavior of a mutant in which Asn(14) is replaced by Met. This mutant has the same PAI-1 binding activity as rVN1-51, but its fragmentation pattern following cyanogen bromide treatment is incompatible with the linear uncrossed disulfide arrangement. These results suggest that active forms of the SMB domain may have a number of allowed disulfide bond arrangements as long as the Cys(25)-Cys(31) disulfide bond is preserved.