Signal transduction in bacterial chemotaxis

Motile bacteria respond to environmental cues to move to more favorable locations. The components of the chemotaxis signal transduction systems that mediate these responses are highly conserved among prokaryotes including both eubacterial and archael species. The best-studied system is that found in Escherichia coli. Attractant and repellant chemicals are sensed through their interactions with transmembrane chemoreceptor proteins that are localized in multimeric assemblies at one or both cell poles together with a histidine protein kinase, CheA, an SH3-like adaptor protein, CheW, and a phosphoprotein phosphatase, CheZ. These multimeric protein assemblies act to control the level of phosphorylation of a response regulator, CheY, which dictates flagellar motion. Bacterial chemotaxis is one of the most-understood signal transduction systems, and many biochemical and structural details of this system have been elucidated. This is an exciting field of study because the depth of knowledge now allows the detailed molecular mechanisms of transmembrane signaling and signal processing to be investigated.     

Signal transduction: hair brains in bacterial chemotaxis

The conserved cytoplasmic domains of bacterial chemotaxis receptors are a fibrous arrangement of alpha-helical coiled coils that look a lot like hair. Such bundles of alpha-helical filaments mediate sensory-motor responses in all prokaryotic cells. How do they work? Very nearly perfectly is probably as good an answer as any.     

Signal transduction in chemotaxis mediated by the bacterial phosphotransferase system

Gram-negative bacteria are able to respond chemotactically to carbohydrates which are substrates of the bacterial phosphoenolpyruvate:sugar phosphotransferase system (PTS). The mechanism of signal transduction in PTS-mediated chemotaxis is different from the well-studied mechanism involving methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs). In PTS-mediated chemotaxis, carbohydrate transport is required, and phosphorylation seems to be involved in both excitation and adaptation. In this review the roles of the components of the PTS in chemotactic signal transduction are discussed. © 1993 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Crystal structure of the CheA histidine phosphotransfer domain that mediates response regulator phosphorylation in bacterial chemotaxis

The x-ray crystal structure of the P1 or H domain of the Salmonella CheA protein has been solved at 2.1-A resolution. The structure is composed of an up-down up-down four-helix bundle that is typical of histidine phosphotransfer or HPt domains such as Escherichia coli ArcB(C) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ypd1. Loop regions and additional structural features distinguish all three proteins. The CheA domain has an additional C-terminal helix that lies over the surface formed by the C and D helices. The phosphoaccepting His-48 is located at a solvent-exposed position in the middle of the B helix where it is surrounded by several residues that are characteristic of other HPt domains. Mutagenesis studies indicate that conserved glutamate and lysine residues that are part of a hydrogen-bond network with His-48 are essential for the ATP-dependent phosphorylation reaction but not for the phosphotransfer reaction with CheY. These results suggest that the CheA-P1 domain may serve as a good model for understanding the general function of HPt domains in complex two-component phosphorelay systems.     

Divalent metal ion binding to the CheY protein and its significance to phosphotransfer in bacterial chemotaxis

Signal transduction in bacterial chemotaxis involves transfer of a phosphoryl group between the cytoplasmic proteins CheA and CheY. In addition to the established metal ion requirement for autophosphorylation of CheA, divalent magnesium ions are necessary for the transfer of phosphate from CheA to CheY. The work described here demonstrates via fluorescence studies that CheY contains a magnesium ion binding site. This site is a strong candidate for the metal ion site required to facilitate phosphotransfer from phospho-CheA to CheY. The diminished magnesium ion interaction with CheY mutant D13N and the lack of metal ion binding to D57N along with significant reduction in phosphotransfer to these two mutants are in direct contrast to the behavior of wild-type CheY. This supports the hypothesis that the acidic pocket formed by Asp13 and Asp57 is essential to metal binding and phosphotransfer activity. Metal ion is also required for the dephosphorylation reaction, raising the possibility that the phosphotransfer and hydrolysis reactions occur by a common metal-phosphoprotein transition-state intermediate. The highly conserved nature of the proposed metal ion binding site and site of phosphorylation within the large family of phosphorylated regulatory proteins that are homologous to CheY supports the hypothesis that all these proteins function by a similar catalytic mechanism.     

Reconstitution of the bacterial chemotaxis signal transduction system from purified components.

In bacterial chemotaxis, transmembrane receptor proteins detect attractants and repellents in the medium and send intracellular signals that control motility. The cytoplasmic proteins that transduce information from the receptors to the flagellar motor have previously been purified and many of their enzymatic activities have been identified. Here we report the reconstitution of the complete signal transduction system from purified components. The protein kinase, CheA, plays a central role in both the initial excitation response to stimuli as well as subsequent events associated with adaptation. This kinase provides phosphoryl groups to two acceptor proteins, CheY, which interacts with the flagellar motor, and CheB, which demethylates the receptors. The purified aspartate receptor, Tar, reconstituted into phospholipid vesicles, acts in conjunction with an auxiliary protein, CheW, to stimulate the rate of kinase autophosphorylation greater than 10-fold. This stimulation is inhibited by aspartate. The activity of the kinase is increased by increased levels of receptor methylation. This effect provides a mechanism that explains how changes in receptor methylation mediate adaptive responses to attractant and repellant stimuli.     

S-adenosylmethionine may not be essential for signal transduction during bacterial chemotaxis.

We previously showed that a mutant strain of Salmonella typhimurium completely deficient in both the chemoreceptor methylating (CheR) and demethylating (CheB) enzymes can still exhibit chemotaxis to aspartate and other attractants (J. Stock, A. Borczuk, F. Chiou, and J. E. B. Burchenal, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82:8364-8368, 1985). We used this cheR cheB mutant to examine the possibility of an additional requirement for S-adenosylmethionine in chemotaxis besides its role in chemoreceptor methylation. A metE mutation was transduced into a cheR cheB double mutant, and the cells were starved for methionine. Despite the fact that intracellular S-adenosylmethionine dropped from approximately 100 microM to less than 0.2 microM, chemotaxis was largely unaffected. In contrast, a corresponding cheR+ cheB+ metE mutant completely lost its chemotaxis ability after being starved for methionine. We conclude from this observation that the primary requirement for S-adenosylmethionine during bacterial chemotaxis is in the methylation of receptor proteins.     

A transient interaction between two phosphorelay proteins trapped in a crystal lattice reveals the mechanism of molecular recognition and phosphotransfer in signal transduction

BACKGROUND: Spo0F and Spo0B specifically exchange a phosphoryl group in a central step of the phosphorelay signal transduction system that controls sporulation in Bacilli. Spo0F belongs to the superfamily of response regulator proteins and is one of 34 such proteins in Bacillus subtilis. Spo0B is structurally similar to the phosphohistidine domain of histidine kinases, such as EnvZ, and exchanges a phosphoryl group between His30 and Asp54 on Spo0F. Information at the molecular level on the interaction between response regulators and phosphohistidine domains is necessary to develop a rationale for how phospho-signaling fidelity is maintained in two-component systems. RESULTS: Structural analysis of a co-crystal of the Spo0F response regulator interacting with the Spo0B phosphotransferase of the phosphorelay signal transduction system of B. subtilis was carried out using X-ray crystallographic techniques. The association of the two molecules brings the catalytic residues from both proteins into precise alignment for phosphoryltransfer. Upon complex formation, the Spo0B conformation remains unchanged. Spo0F also retains the overall conformation; however, two loops around the active site show significant deviations. CONCLUSIONS: The Spo0F-Spo0B interaction appears to be a prototype for response regulator-histidine kinase interactions. The primary contact surface between these two proteins is formed by hydrophobic regions in both proteins. The Spo0F residues making up the hydrophobic patch are very similar in all response regulators suggesting that the binding is initiated through the same residues in all interacting response regulator-kinase pairs. The bulk of the interactions outside this patch are through nonconserved residues. Recognition specificity is proposed to arise from interactions of the nonconserved residues, especially the hypervariable residues of the beta4-alpha4 loop.     

Signal transduction in neutrophil chemotaxis

This review discusses current knowledge on signal transduction pathways controlling chemotaxis of neutrophils and similar cells. Most neutrophil chemoattractants bind to seven-transmembrane-helix receptors. These receptors activate trimeric G proteins of the Gi class in neutrophils to initiate chemotaxis. Phospholipases Cbeta, phosphoinositide 3-kinase gamma, and PH domain-containing proteins play various roles in signaling further downstream. The actin cytoskeleton is crucial for cell motility, and is controlled by Rho family GTP-binding proteins. PIP 5-kinase, LIM kinase, myosin light chain kinase and phosphatase, or WASP-like proteins may be important links between Rho GTPases and actin during chemotaxis. Newly emerging ideas on the regulation of the "compass" of chemotaxing cells, which may involve Cdc42 and certain PH domain-containing proteins, are also presented.     

Phosphorylation of three proteins in the signaling pathway of bacterial chemotaxis

Six cytoplasmic che gene products are required for signal transduction in bacterial chemotaxis, but the nature of their biochemical interactions is not known. We show that in vitro the CheA protein becomes autophosphorylated in the presence of ATP. In addition, the phosphate group on CheA can be rapidly transferred to CheB, a protein involved in adaptation to stimuli, or to CheY, a protein involved in the excitation response. The phosphorylation of CheB and CheY is transient; they readily dephosphorylate. We have also found that CheZ, a protein that appears to antagonize CheY function in vivo, accelerates the hydrolysis of the phosphate on CheY. These results suggest that signal transduction in bacterial chemotaxis may involve the flow of phosphate through a cascade of phosphorylated protein intermediates.     

Direct sensing and signal transduction during bacterial chemotaxis toward aromatic compounds in Comamonas testosteroni

Micro‐organisms sense and chemotactically respond to aromatic compounds. Although the existence of chemoreceptors that bind to aromatic attractants and subsequently trigger chemotaxis have long been speculated, such a chemoreceptor has not been demonstrated. In this report, we demonstrated that the chemoreceptor MCP2901 from Comamonas testosteroni CNB‐1 binds to aromatic compounds and initiates downstream chemotactic signaling in addition to its ability to trigger chemotaxis via citrate binding. The function of gene MCP2901 was investigated by genetic deletion from CNB‐1 and genetic complementation of the methyl‐accepting chemotaxis protein (MCP)‐null mutant CNB‐1Δ20. Results showed that the expression of MCP2901 in the MCP‐null mutant restored chemotaxis toward nine tested aromatic compounds and nine carboxylic acids. Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) analyses demonstrated that the ligand‐binding domain of MCP2901 (MCP2901LBD) bound to citrate, and weakly to gentisate and 4‐hydroxybenzoate. Additionally, ITC assays indicated that MCP2901LBD bound strongly to 2,6‐dihydroxybenzoate and 2‐hydroxybenzoate, which are isomers of gentisate and 4‐hydroxybenzoate respectively that are not metabolized by CNB‐1. Agarose‐in‐plug and capillary assays showed that these two molecules serve as chemoattractants for CNB‐1. Through constructing membrane‐like MCP2901‐inserted Nanodiscs and phosphorelay activity assays, we demonstrated that 2,6‐dihydroxybenzoate and 2‐hydroxybenzoate altered kinase activity of CheA. This is the first evidence of an MCP binding to an aromatic molecule and triggering signal transduction for bacterial chemotaxis.     

Function of the pseudo phosphotransfer proteins has diverged between rice and Arabidopsis

The phytohormone cytokinin plays a significant role in nearly all aspects of plant growth and development. Cytokinin signaling has primarily been studied in the dicot model Arabidopsis, with relatively little work done in monocots, which include rice (Oryza sativa) and other cereals of agronomic importance. The cytokinin signaling pathway is a phosphorelay comprised of the histidine kinase receptors, the authentic histidine phosphotransfer proteins (AHPs) and type-B response regulators (RRs). Two negative regulators of cytokinin signaling have been identified: the type-A RRs, which are cytokinin primary response genes, and the pseudo histidine phosphotransfer proteins (PHPs), which lack the His residue required for phosphorelay. Here, we describe the role of the rice PHP genes. Phylogenic analysis indicates that the PHPs are generally first found in the genomes of gymnosperms and that they arose independently in monocots and dicots. Consistent with this, the three rice PHPs fail to complement an Arabidopsis php mutant (aphp1/ahp6). Disruption of the three rice PHPs results in a molecular phenotype consistent with these elements acting as negative regulators of cytokinin signaling, including the induction of a number of type-A RR and cytokinin oxidase genes. The triple php mutant affects multiple aspects of rice growth and development, including shoot morphology, panicle architecture, and seed fill. In contrast to Arabidopsis, disruption of the rice PHPs does not affect root vascular patterning, suggesting that while many aspects of key signaling networks are conserved between monocots and dicots, the roles of at least some cytokinin signaling elements are distinct.     

Molecular model of a lattice of signalling proteins involved in bacterial chemotaxis

Coliform bacteria detect chemical attractants by means of a membrane-associated cluster of receptors and signalling molecules. We have used recently determined molecular structures, in conjunction with plastic models generated by three-dimensional printer technology, to predict how the proteins of the complex are arranged in relation to the plasma membrane. The proposed structure is a regular two-dimensional lattice in which the cytoplasmic ends of chemotactic-receptor dimers are inserted into a hexagonal array of CheA and CheW molecules. This structure creates separate compartments for adaptation and downstream signalling, and indicates a possible basis for the spread of activity within the cluster.     

Co-expression of signaling proteins improves robustness of the bacterial chemotaxis pathway

Biological systems are exposed to various perturbations that affect performance of the cellular networks, with stochastic variation in protein levels, or gene expression noise, being one of the major sources of intracellular perturbations. We recently used Escherichia coli chemotaxis as a model to analyze robustness against such noise and demonstrated theoretically and experimentally that a steady-state output of the pathway is robust against concerted variation in the levels of all chemotaxis proteins. However, our model predicted that the pathway topology does not confer much robustness against an uncorrelated variation in the protein levels. To test whether additional robustness features might be missing from our model, we compare here its predictions with an experimentally determined chemotactic performance under varying levels of individual proteins. Our data show that the pathway is indeed even more robust than predicted to two types of perturbations-the variation in the levels of the adaptation enzymes and a correlated expression of CheY and CheZ. Although the design features that are responsible for this higher robustness still remain to be understood, our results stress the importance of a robust design of both native and synthetic signaling networks.     

Signal transduction for chemotaxis in Dictyostelium amoebae

The signal for chemotaxis in D. discoideum is cyclic AMP. This molecule binds to cell surface receptors and triggers the production of inositol (1,4,5)trisphosphate which releases Ca2+ from non-mitochondrial stores. The subsequent chain of signal transduction events brings about the polymerization of cytoskeletal actin (associated with pseudopodium formation) within five seconds and the formation of a peak of cyclic GMP within 10 s. Evidence from streamer F mutants indicates that the cyclic GMP regulates the association of myosin with the cytoskeleton that occurs at 25-50 s and that this phenomenon is concerned with elongation of the amoebae during chemotactic movement.     

Response regulation in bacterial chemotaxis

The signal transduction system that mediates bacterial chemotaxis allows cells to moduate their swimming behavior in response to fluctuations in chemical stimuli. Receptors at the cell surface receive information from the surroundings. Signals are then passed from the receptors to cytoplasmic chemotaxis components: CheA, CheW, CheZ, CheR, and CheB. These proteins function to regulate the level of phosphorylation of a response regulator designated CheY that interacts with the flagellar motor switch complex to control swimming behavior. The structure of CheY has been determined. Magnesium ion is essential for activity. The active site contains highly conserved Asp residues that are required for divalent metal ion binding and CheY phosphorylation. Another residue-at the active site, Lys109, is important in the phosphorylation-induced conformational change that facilitates communication with the switch complex and another chemotaxis component, CheZ. CheZ facilitates the dephosphorylation of phospho-CheY. Defects in CheY and CheZ can be suppressed by mutations in the flagellar switch complex. CheZ is thought to modulate the switch bias by varying the level of phospho-CheY. © 1993 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Spatial organization in bacterial chemotaxis

Spatial organization of signalling is not an exclusive property of eukaryotic cells. Despite the fact that bacterial signalling pathways are generally simpler than those in eukaryotes, there are several well‐documented examples of higher‐order intracellular signalling structures in bacteria. One of the most prominent and best‐characterized structures is formed by proteins that control bacterial chemotaxis. Signals in chemotaxis are processed by ordered arrays, or clusters, of receptors and associated proteins, which amplify and integrate chemotactic stimuli in a highly cooperative manner. Receptor clusters further serve to scaffold protein interactions, enhancing the efficiency and specificity of the pathway reactions and preventing the formation of signalling gradients through the cell body. Moreover, clustering can also ensure spatial separation of multiple chemotaxis systems in one bacterium. Assembly of receptor clusters appears to be a stochastic process, but bacteria evolved mechanisms to ensure optimal cluster distribution along the cell body for partitioning to daughter cells at division.