A Chimeric Arabinogalactan Protein Promotes Somatic Embryogenesis in Cotton Cell Culture

Arabinogalactan proteins (AGPs) are a family of extracellular plant proteoglycans implicated in many aspects of plant growth and development, including in vitro somatic embryogenesis (SE). We found that specific AGPs were produced by cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) calli undergoing SE and that when these AGPs were isolated and incorporated into tissue culture medium, cotton SE was promoted. When the AGPs were partly or fully deglycosylated, SE-promoting activity was not diminished. Testing of AGPs separated by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography revealed that the SE-promoting activity resided in a hydrophobic fraction. We cloned a full-length complementary DNA (cotton PHYTOCYANIN-LIKE ARABINOGALACTAN-PROTEIN1 [GhPLA1]) that encoded the protein backbone of an AGP in the active fraction. It has a chimeric structure comprising an amino-terminal signal sequence, a phytocyanin-like domain, an AGP-like domain, and a hydrophobic carboxyl-terminal domain. Recombinant production of GhPLA1 in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) cells enabled us to purify and analyze a single glycosylated AGP and to demonstrate that this chimeric AGP promotes cotton SE. Furthermore, the nonglycosylated phytocyanin-like domain from GhPLA1, which was bacterially produced, also promoted SE, indicating that the glycosylated AGP domain was unnecessary for in vitro activity.Arabinogalactan proteins (AGPs) comprise a diverse group of plant proteoglycans (for review, see Fincher et al., 1993; Nothnagel, 1997; Seifert and Roberts, 2007; Ellis et al., 2010). They are structurally complex, generally consisting of a Pro-, Ala-, Ser-, and Thr-rich protein backbone that is extensively modified, principally by hydroxylation of Pro residues (to Hyp) and subsequent glycosylation through O-linkages with type II arabinogalactans (Tan et al., 2003; Shimizu et al., 2005). Many AGPs also have a C-terminal hydrophobic domain that is processed and replaced with a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor, which acts to tether the molecule to the extracellular face of the plasma membrane (Schultz et al., 1998). AGPs are also defined by their ability to be bound and precipitated by the synthetic dye β-glucosyl Yariv reagent (β-GlcY) and related molecules (Yariv et al., 1967). These dyes have been useful in isolating, localizing, and quantifying AGPs.AGPs are grouped into three subclasses (Schultz et al., 2002): AGPs have an N-terminal signal sequence, an arabinogalactosylated domain, and a hydrophobic C-terminal domain; “chimeric AGPs” contain at least one arabinogalactosylated domain and a domain with an unrelated motif; while “hybrid AGPs” contain arabinogalactosylated as well as different Pro/Hyp-rich glycoprotein motifs.AGPs are implicated in many aspects of plant cell growth and development. Historically, it was not possible to assign roles to individual AGPs, as tests were conducted with unfractionated mixtures of AGPs. More recently, individual AGPs, mainly from Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), have been studied using techniques such as mutant analysis and gene knockout/silencing, providing evidence for roles of individual AGPs in cell expansion, root and seed regeneration, the coordination of vascular development, both male and female gametogenesis, the development of cotton fibers, and as contributors to plant stem strength (Shi et al., 2003; van Hengel and Roberts, 2003; Acosta-García and Vielle-Calzada, 2004; Motose et al., 2004; Yang et al., 2007; Levitin et al., 2008; Coimbra et al., 2009; Li et al., 2010; MacMillan et al., 2010).Conditioned media from in vitro embryogenic cultures contain factors that can promote somatic embryogenesis (SE), implying the presence of secreted signaling molecules (de Vries et al., 1988). There is evidence that secreted AGPs, which are components of conditioned media, are involved in SE. For example, SE in carrot (Daucus carota) and spruce (Picea abies) cell cultures was promoted when AGPs from conditioned media were added exogenously (Kreuger and van Holst, 1993; Egertsdotter and von Arnold, 1995). Subsequent studies showed the association of particular AGP epitopes with SE-promoting activity and the involvement of AGPs in SE for several other species (Kreuger et al., 1995; McCabe et al., 1997; Toonen et al., 1997; Chapman et al., 2000; Saare-Surminski et al., 2000; Ben Amar et al., 2007). There is also evidence that SE-promoting AGPs may be cleaved by an endochitinase (Egertsdotter and von Arnold, 1988; Domon et al., 2000; van Hengel et al., 2001, 2002), but neither the identity of the individual AGP(s) involved in promoting SE nor the mechanism of action has been established.In this study, we focused on SE in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum ‘Coker 315’), which is a limiting step in cotton transformation, and the potential role of AGPs in this process. We show that cotton calli undergoing somatic embryogenesis secrete an AGP fraction that promotes SE when incorporated back into the growth medium. We report the cloning and sequencing of a complementary DNA (cDNA) encoding a chimeric AGP present in this fraction and show that this molecule promotes SE.     

Glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) Modification Serves as a Primary Plasmodesmal Sorting Signal

Plasmodesmata (Pd) are membranous channels that serve as a major conduit for cell-to-cell communication in plants. The Pd-associated β-1,3-glucanase (BG_pap) and CALLOSE BINDING PROTEIN1 (PDCB1) were identified as key regulators of Pd conductivity. Both are predicted glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins (GPI-APs) carrying a conserved GPI modification signal. However, the subcellular targeting mechanism of these proteins is unknown, particularly in the context of other GPI-APs not associated with Pd. Here, we conducted a comparative analysis of the subcellular targeting of the two Pd-resident and two unrelated non-Pd GPI-APs in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). We show that GPI modification is necessary and sufficient for delivering both BG_pap and PDCB1 to Pd. Moreover, the GPI modification signal from both Pd- and non-Pd GPI-APs is able to target a reporter protein to Pd, likely to plasma membrane microdomains enriched at Pd. As such, the GPI modification serves as a primary Pd sorting signal in plant cells. Interestingly, the ectodomain, a region that carries the functional domain in GPI-APs, in Pd-resident proteins further enhances Pd accumulation. However, in non-Pd GPI-APs, the ectodomain overrides the Pd targeting function of the GPI signal and determines a specific GPI-dependent non-Pd localization of these proteins at the plasma membrane and cell wall. Domain-swap analysis showed that the non-Pd localization is also dominant over the Pd-enhancing function mediated by a Pd ectodomain. In conclusion, our results indicate that segregation between Pd- and non-Pd GPI-APs occurs prior to Pd targeting, providing, to our knowledge, the first evidence of the mechanism of GPI-AP sorting in plants.Plant cells are interconnected with cross-wall membranous channels called plasmodesmata (Pd). Recent studies have shown that the region of the plasma membrane (PM) lining the Pd channel is a specialized membrane microdomain whose lipid and protein composition differs from the rest of the PM (Tilsner et al., 2011, 2016; Bayer et al., 2014; González-Solís et al., 2014; Grison et al., 2015). In a similar manner, the cell wall domain surrounding the Pd channel is specialized and, unlike the rest of the cell wall, is devoid of cellulose, rich in pectin, and contains callose (an insoluble β-1,3-glucan; Zavaliev et al., 2011; Knox and Benitez-Alfonso, 2014). In response to physiological signals, callose can be transiently deposited and degraded at Pd, which provides a mechanism for controlling the Pd aperture in diverse developmental and stress-related processes (Zavaliev et al., 2011). Control of Pd functioning is mediated by proteins that are specifically targeted to Pd. Plasmodesmal proteins localized to the PM domain of Pd can be integral transmembrane proteins, such as Pd-localized proteins (Thomas et al., 2008), the receptor kinase ARABIDOPSIS CRINKLY4 (Stahl et al., 2013), and callose synthases (Vatén et al., 2011). Alternatively, Pd proteins can associate with the membrane through a lipid modification like myristoylation (e.g. remorins; Raffaele et al., 2009) or be attached by a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor (e.g. Pd-associated β-1,3-glucanases [BG_pap]; Levy et al., 2007; Rinne et al., 2011; Benitez-Alfonso et al., 2013), Pd-associated callose-binding proteins (PDCBs; Simpson et al., 2009), and LYSIN MOTIF DOMAIN-CONTAINING PROTEIN2 (LYM2; Faulkner et al., 2013).Among the known Pd proteins involved in Pd-specific callose degradation is BG_pap, a cell wall enzyme carrying a glycosyl hydrolase family 17 (GH17) module as its functional domain (Levy et al., 2007). Another group of proteins controlling callose dynamics at Pd are PDCBs that harbor a callose-binding domain termed carbohydrate-binding module 43 (CBM43), implicated in stabilizing callose at Pd (Simpson et al., 2009). Some β-1,3-glucanases may combine the two callose-modifying activities by harboring both GH17 and CBM43 functional domains, and several such proteins were shown to localize to Pd (Rinne et al., 2011; Benitez-Alfonso et al., 2013; Gaudioso-Pedraza and Benitez-Alfonso, 2014). A distinct feature of BG_pap and PDCBs is that both are predicted glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins (GPI-APs). The GPI anchor is a form of posttranslational modification common to many cell surface proteins in all eukaryotes. GPI-APs are covalently attached to the outer leaflet of the PM through the GPI anchor. The basic structure of the anchor consists of ethanolamine phosphate, followed by a glycan chain of three Man residues and glucosamine, followed by phosphatidylinositol lipid moiety (EtNP-6Manα1-2Manα1-6Manα1-4GlcNα1-6myoinositol-1-P-lipid; Ferguson et al., 2009). All predicted GPI-APs carry an N-terminal secretion signal peptide (SP) similar to other secreted proteins. Distinctly, GPI-APs also carry a structurally conserved 25- to 30-residue C-terminal GPI attachment signal, which typically begins with a small amino acid (e.g. Ala, Asn, Asp, Cys, Gly, or Ser) termed omega, followed by a spacer region of five to 10 polar residues, and ending with a transmembrane segment of 15 to 20 hydrophobic residues (Ferguson et al., 2009). The entire region between the N-terminal and the C-terminal signals of a GPI-AP is termed the ectodomain and carries the protein’s functional domain(s). The GPI modification process takes place in the lumenal face of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) in a cotranslational manner. Upon translocation into the ER, a GPI-AP is stabilized in the ER membrane by its C-terminal signal, which is concurrently cleaved after the omega amino acid, and a preassembled GPI anchor is covalently attached to the C terminus of the omega amino acid. After attachment to a protein, the GPI anchor undergoes a series of modifications (remodeling), both at the glucan chain and at the lipid moiety. Such remodeling is crucial for the sorting of GPI-APs in the secretory pathway and the subsequent lateral heterogeneity at the PM (Kinoshita, 2015). In particular, the addition of saturated fatty acid chains to the lipid moiety of the anchor leads to the enriched accumulation of GPI-APs in the PM microdomains, also termed lipid rafts (Muñiz and Zurzolo, 2014). In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), GPI modification has been predicted for 210 proteins of diverse functions at the PM or the cell wall or both (Borner et al., 2002). Despite extensive research on the GPI modification pathway and the function of GPI-APs in mammalian and yeast cells, such knowledge in plant systems is scarce. In particular, despite an emerging role of GPI-APs in the regulation of the cell wall domain of Pd, their subcellular targeting and compartmentalization mechanism have not been studied. In addition, it is not known how the targeting mechanism of Pd-resident GPI-APs is different from that of other classes of GPI-APs, which are not localized to Pd.In this study, we investigated the subcellular targeting mechanism of Pd-associated callose-modifying GPI-APs, BG_pap and PDCB1, and compared it with that of two unrelated non-Pd GPI-APs, ARABINOGALACTAN PROTEIN4 (AGP4) and LIPID TRANSFER PROTEIN1 (LTPG1). Using sequential fluorescent labeling of protein domains, we found that the C-terminal GPI modification signal present in both Pd- and non-Pd GPI-APs can function as a primary signal in targeting proteins to the Pd-enriched PM domain. Moreover, we show that while the GPI signal is sufficient for Pd targeting, the ectodomains in BG_pap and PDCB1 further enhance their accumulation at Pd. In contrast, the ectodomains in non-Pd GPI-APs mediate exclusion of the proteins from the Pd-enriched targeting pathway. The Pd exclusion effect was found to be dominant over the Pd-targeting function of the GPI signal and the Pd-enhancing function of the Pd ectodomain, and it possibly occurs prior to PM localization. Our findings thus uncover a novel Pd-targeting signal and provide, to our knowledge, the first evidence of the cellular mechanism that regulates the sorting of GPI-APs in plants.     

Salicylic Acid Regulates Arabidopsis Microbial Pattern Receptor Kinase Levels and Signaling

In Arabidopsis thaliana, responses to pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) are mediated by cell surface pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) and include the accumulation of reactive oxygen species, callose deposition in the cell wall, and the generation of the signal molecule salicylic acid (SA). SA acts in a positive feedback loop with ACCELERATED CELL DEATH6 (ACD6), a membrane protein that contributes to immunity. This work shows that PRRs associate with and are part of the ACD6/SA feedback loop. ACD6 positively regulates the abundance of several PRRs and affects the responsiveness of plants to two PAMPs. SA accumulation also causes increased levels of PRRs and potentiates the responsiveness of plants to PAMPs. Finally, SA induces PRR- and ACD6-dependent signaling to induce callose deposition independent of the presence of PAMPs. This PAMP-independent effect of SA causes a transient reduction of PRRs and ACD6-dependent reduced responsiveness to PAMPs. Thus, SA has a dynamic effect on the regulation and function of PRRs. Within a few hours, SA signaling promotes defenses and downregulates PRRs, whereas later (within 24 to 48 h) SA signaling upregulates PRRs, and plants are rendered more responsive to PAMPs. These results implicate multiple modes of signaling for PRRs in response to PAMPs and SA.     

The occurrence of spring forms in tetraploid Timopheevi wheat is associated with variation in the first intron of the <Emphasis Type="Italic">VRN-A1</Emphasis> gene

Background

Triticum araraticum and Triticum timopheevii are tetraploid species of the Timopheevi group. The former includes both winter and spring forms with a predominance of winter forms, whereas T. timopheevii is considered a spring species. In order to clarify the origin of the spring growth habit in T. timopheevii, allelic variability of the VRN-1 gene was investigated in a set of accessions of both tetraploid species, together with the diploid species Ae. speltoides, presumed donor of the G genome to these tetraploids.

Results

The promoter region of the VRN-A1 locus in all studied tetraploid accessions of both T. araraticum and T. timopheevii represents the previously described allele VRN-A1f with a 50 bp deletion near the start codon. Three additional alleles were identified namely, VRN-A1f-del, VRN-A1f-ins and VRN-A1f-del/ins, which contained large mutations in the first (1^st) intron of VRN-A1. The first allele, carrying a deletion of 2.7 kb in a central part of intron 1, occurred in a few accessions of T. araraticum and no accessions of T. timopheevii. The VRN-A1f-ins allele, containing the insertion of a 0.4 kb MITE element about 0.4 kb upstream from the start of intron 1, and allele VRN-A1f-del/ins having this insertion coupled with a deletion of 2.7 kb are characteristic only for T. timopheevii. Allelic variation at the VRN-G1 locus includes the previously described allele VRN-G1a (with the insertion of a 0.2 kb MITE in the promoter) found in a few accessions of both tetraploid species. We showed that alleles VRN-A1f-del and VRN-G1a have no association with the spring growth habit, while in all accessions of T. timopheevii this habit was associated with the dominant VRN-A1f-ins and VRN-A1f-del/ins alleles. None of the Ae. speltoides accessions included in this study had changes in the promoter or 1^st intron regions of VRN-1 which might confer a spring growth habit. The VRN-1 promoter sequences analyzed herein and downloaded from databases have been used to construct a phylogram to assess the time of divergence of Ae. speltoides in relation to other wheat species.

Conclusions

Among accessions of T. araraticum, the preferentially winter predecessor of T. timopheevii, two large mutations were found in both VRN-A1 and VRN-G1 loci (VRN-A1f-del and VRN-G1a) that were found to have no effect on vernalization requirements. Spring tetraploid T. timopheevii had one VRN-1 allele in common for two species (VRN-G1a), and two that were specific (VRN-A1f-ins, VRN-A1f-del/ins). The latter alleles include mutations in the 1^st intron of VRN-A1 and also share a 0.4 kb MITE insertion near the start of intron 1. We suggested that this insertion resulted in a spring growth habit in a progenitor of T. timopheevii which has probably been selected during subsequent domestication. The phylogram constructed on the basis of the VRN-1 promoter sequences confirmed the early divergence (~3.5 MYA) of the ancestor(s) of the B/G genomes from Ae. speltoides.

     

Acyl Editing and Headgroup Exchange Are the Major Mechanisms That Direct Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid Flux into Triacylglycerols

Triacylglycerols (TAG) in seeds of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and many plant species contain large amounts of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA). These PUFA are synthesized on the membrane lipid phosphatidylcholine (PC). However, the exact mechanisms of how fatty acids enter PC and how they are removed from PC after being modified to participate in the TAG assembly are unclear, nor are the identities of the key enzymes/genes that control these fluxes known. By reverse genetics and metabolic labeling experiments, we demonstrate that two genes encoding the lysophosphatidylcholine acyltransferases LPCAT1 and LPCAT2 in Arabidopsis control the previously identified “acyl-editing” process, the main entry of fatty acids into PC. The lpcat1/lpcat2 mutant showed increased contents of very-long-chain fatty acids and decreased PUFA in TAG and the accumulation of small amounts of lysophosphatidylcholine in developing seeds revealed by [¹⁴C]acetate-labeling experiments. We also showed that mutations in LPCATs and the PC diacylglycerol cholinephosphotransferase in the reduced oleate desaturation1 (rod1)/lpcat1/lpcat2 mutant resulted in a drastic reduction of PUFA content in seed TAG, accumulating only one-third of the wild-type level. These results indicate that PC acyl editing and phosphocholine headgroup exchange between PC and diacylglycerols control the majority of acyl fluxes through PC to provide PUFA for TAG synthesis.Plant oils are an important natural resource to meet the increasing demands of food, feed, biofuel, and industrial applications (Lu et al., 2011; Snapp and Lu, 2012). The fatty acid composition in the triacylglycerols (TAG), especially the contents of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) or other specialized structures, such as hydroxy, epoxy, or conjugated groups, determines the properties and thus the uses of plant oils (Dyer and Mullen, 2008; Dyer et al., 2008; Pinzi et al., 2009; Riediger et al., 2009). To effectively modify seed oils tailored for different uses, it is necessary to understand the fundamental aspects of how plant fatty acids are synthesized and accumulated in seed oils.In developing oilseeds, fatty acids are synthesized in plastids and are exported into the cytosol mainly as oleic acid, 18:1 (carbon number:double bonds), and a small amount of palmitic acid (16:0) and stearic acid (18:0; Ohlrogge and Browse, 1995). Further modification of 18:1 occurs on the endoplasmic reticulum in two major pathways (Fig. 1): (1) the 18:1-CoA may be elongated into 20:1- to 22:1-CoA esters by a fatty acid elongase, FAE1 (Kunst et al., 1992); (2) the dominant flux of 18:1 in many oilseeds is to enter the membrane lipid phosphatidylcholine (PC; Shanklin and Cahoon, 1998; Bates and Browse, 2012), where they can be desaturated by the endoplasmic reticulum-localized fatty acid desaturases including the oleate desaturase, FAD2, and the linoleate desaturase, FAD3, to produce the polyunsaturated linoleic acid (18:2) and α-linolenic acid (18:3; Browse et al., 1993; Okuley et al., 1994). The PUFA may be removed from PC to enter the acyl-CoA pool, or PUFA-rich diacylglycerol (DAG) may be derived from PC by removal of the phosphocholine headgroup (Bates and Browse, 2012). The PUFA-rich TAG are then produced from de novo-synthesized DAG or PC-derived DAG (Bates and Browse, 2012) and PUFA-CoA by the acyl-CoA:diacylglycerol acyltransferases (DGAT; Hobbs et al., 1999; Zou et al., 1999). Alternatively, PUFA may be directly transferred from PC onto DAG to form TAG by an acyl-CoA-independent phospholipid:diacylglycerol acyltransferase (PDAT; Dahlqvist et al., 2000). Recent results demonstrated that DGAT and PDAT are responsible for the majority of TAG synthesized in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) seeds (Zhang et al., 2009).Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Reactions involved in the flux of fatty acids into TAG. De novo glycerolipid synthesis is shown in white arrows, acyl transfer reactions are indicated by dashed lines, and the movement of the lipid glycerol backbone through the pathway is shown in solid lines. Major reactions (in thick lines) controlling the flux of fatty acid from PC into TAG are as follows: LPC acylation reaction of acyl editing by LPCAT (A); PC deacylation reaction of acyl editing by the reverse action of LPCAT or phospholipase A (B); and the interconversion of DAG and PC by PDCT (C). Substrates are in boldface, enzymatic reactions are in italics. FAD, Fatty acid desaturase; FAS, fatty acid synthase; GPAT, acyl-CoA:G3P acyltransferase; LPA, lysophosphatidic acid; LPAT, acyl-CoA:LPA acyltransferase; PA, phosphatidic acid; PLC, phospholipase C; PLD, phospholipase D.The above TAG synthesis model highlights the importance of acyl fluxes through PC for PUFA enrichment in plant oils. However, the exact mechanisms of how fatty acids enter PC and how they are removed from PC after being modified to participate in the TAG assembly are unclear, nor are the identities of the enzymes/genes that control these fluxes known. The traditional view is that 18:1 enters PC through de novo glycerolipid synthesis (Fig. 1; Kennedy, 1961): the sequential acylation of glycerol-3-phosphate (G3P) at the sn-1 and sn-2 positions produces phosphatidic acid; subsequent removal of the phosphate group at the sn-3 position of phosphatidic acid by phosphatidic acid phosphatases (PAPs) produces de novo DAG; finally, PC is formed from DAG by a cytidine-5′-diphosphocholine:diacylglycerol cholinephosphotransferase (CPT; Slack et al., 1983; Goode and Dewey, 1999). However, metabolic labeling experiments in many different plant tissues by us and others (Williams et al., 2000; Bates et al., 2007, 2009; Bates and Browse, 2012; Tjellström et al., 2012) have demonstrated that the majority of newly synthesized fatty acids (e.g. 18:1) enter PC by a process termed “acyl editing” rather than by proceeding through de novo PC synthesis. Acyl editing is a deacylation-reacylation cycle of PC that exchanges the fatty acids on PC with fatty acids in the acyl-CoA pool (Fig. 1, A and B). Through acyl editing, newly synthesized 18:1 can be incorporated into PC for desaturation and PUFA can be released from PC to the acyl-CoA pool to be utilized for glycerolipid synthesis.Additionally, there is accumulating evidence that many plants utilize PC-derived DAG to synthesize TAG laden with PUFA (Bates and Browse, 2012). PC-derived DAG may be synthesized through the reverse reaction of the CPT (Slack et al., 1983, 1985) or by the phospholipases C and D (followed by PAP). However, our recent discovery indicates that the main PC-to-DAG conversion is catalyzed by a phosphatidylcholine:diacylglycerol cholinephosphotransferase (PDCT) through the phosphocholine headgroup exchange between PC and DAG (Fig. 1C; Lu et al., 2009; Hu et al., 2012). The PDCT is encoded by the REDUCED OLEATE DESATURATION1 (ROD1) gene (At3g15820) in Arabidopsis, which is responsible for about 40% of the flux of PUFA from PC through DAG into TAG synthesis (Lu et al., 2009). Acyl editing and PC-DAG interconversion through PDCT may work together to generate PUFA-rich TAG in oilseed plants (Bates and Browse, 2012).The enzymes/genes involved in the incorporation of 18:1 into PC through acyl editing are not known. However, stereochemical localization of newly synthesized fatty acid incorporation into PC predominantly at the sn-2 position (Bates et al., 2007, 2009; Tjellström et al., 2012) strongly suggest that the acyl editing cycle proceeds through the acylation of lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) by acyl-CoA:lysophosphatidylcholine acyltransferases (LPCATs [Enzyme Commission 2.3.1.23]; Fig. 1A). High LPCAT activity has been detected in many different oilseed plants that accumulate large amounts of PUFA in TAG (Stymne and Stobart, 1987; Bates and Browse, 2012), suggesting the potential ubiquitous involvement of LPCAT in the generation of PUFA-rich TAG. Several possible pathways for the removal of acyl groups from PC to generate the lysophosphatidylcholine within the acyl editing cycle have been proposed. The acyl groups may be released from PC to enter the acyl-CoA pool via the reverse reactions of LPCATs (Stymne and Stobart, 1984) or by reactions of phospholipase A (Chen et al., 2011) followed by the acyl-CoA synthetases (Shockey et al., 2002). The main focus of this study was to identify the genes and enzymes involved in the incorporation of fatty acids into PC through acyl editing in Arabidopsis and to quantify the contribution of acyl editing and PDCT-based PC-DAG interconversion to controlling the flux of PUFA from PC into TAG. Herein, we demonstrate that mutants of two Arabidopsis genes encoding LPCATs (At1g12640 [LPCAT1] and At1g63050 [LPCAT2]) have reduced TAG PUFA content. Analysis of the acyl-editing cycle through metabolic labeling of developing seeds with [¹⁴C]acetate indicate that the lpcat1/lpcat2 double mutant was devoid of acyl editing-based incorporation of newly synthesized fatty acids into PC, indicating that these two genes are responsible for the acylation of LPC during acyl editing. Additionally, the triple mutant rod1/lpcat1/lpcat2 indicated that PDCT-based PC-DAG interconversion and acyl editing together provide two-thirds of the flux of PUFA from PC to TAG in Arabidopsis seeds.     

Inactivation of bone morphogenetic protein 1 (<Emphasis Type="Italic">Bmp1</Emphasis>) and tolloid-like 1 (<Emphasis Type="Italic">Tll1</Emphasis>) in cells expressing type I collagen leads to dental and periodontal defects in mice

Bone morphogenetic protein 1 (BMP1) and tolloid-like 1 (TLL1) belong to the BMP1/tolloid-like proteinase family, which cleaves secretory proteins. The constitutive deletion of the Bmp1 or Tll1 genes causes perinatal or embryonic lethality in mice. In this study, we first studied the β-galactosidase activity in mice in which an IRES-lacZ-Neo cassette was inserted in the intron of either the Bmp1 or the Tll1 gene; the β-galactosidase activities were used to reflect the expression of endogenous Bmp1 and Tll1, respectively. Our X-gal staining results showed that the odontoblasts in the tooth and cells in the periodontal ligament express both Bmp1 and Tll1. We then created Bmp1 ^flox/flox and Tll1 ^flox/flox mice by removing the IRES-lacZ-Neo cassette. By breeding 2.3 kb Col1a1-Cre mice with the Bmp1 ^flox/flox and Tll1 ^flox/flox mice, we further generated Col1a1-Cre;Bmp1 ^flox/flox ;Tll1 ^flox/flox mice in which both Bmp1 and Tll1 were inactivated in the Type I collagen-expressing cells. We employed X-ray radiography, histology and immunohistochemistry approaches to characterize the Col1a1-Cre;Bmp1 ^flox/flox ;Tll1 ^flox/flox mice. Our results showed that the molars of the Col1a1-Cre;Bmp1 ^flox/flox ;Tll1 ^flox/flox mice had wider predentin, thinner dentin and larger pulp chambers than those of the normal controls. The dentinal tubules of the molars in the Col1a1-Cre;Bmp1 ^flox/flox ;Tll1 ^flox/flox mice appeared disorganized. The level of dentin sialophosphoprotein in the molars of the 6-week-old Col1a1-Cre;Bmp1 ^flox/flox ;Tll1 ^flox/flox mice was lower than in the normal controls. The periodontal ligaments of the Col1a1-Cre;Bmp1 ^flox/flox ;Tll1 ^flox/flox mice were disorganized and had less fibrillin-1. Our findings indicate that the proteinases encoded by Bmp1 and Tll1 genes play essential roles in the development and maintenance of mouse dentin and periodontal ligaments.     

A putative <Emphasis Type="Italic">NEM1</Emphasis> homologue regulates lipid droplet biogenesis <Emphasis Type="Italic">via PAH1</Emphasis> in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Tetrahymena thermophila</Emphasis>

Nuclear envelope morphology protein 1 (NEM1) along with a phosphatidate phosphatase (PAH1) regulates lipid homeostasis and membrane biogenesis in yeast and mammals. We investigated four putative NEM1 homologues (TtNEM1A, TtNEM1B, TtNEM1C and TtNEM1D) in the Tetrahymena thermophila genome. Disruption of TtNEM1B, TtNEM1C or TtNEM1D did not compromise normal cell growth. In contrast, we were unable to generate knockout strain of TtNEM1A under the same conditions, indicating that TtNEM1A is essential for Tetrahymena growth. Interestingly, loss of TtNEM1B but not TtNEM1C or TtNEM1D caused a reduction in lipid droplet number. Similar to yeast and mammals, TtNem1B of Tetrahymena exerts its function via Pah1, since we found that PAH1 overexpression rescued loss of Nem1 function. However, unlike NEM1 in other organisms, TtNEM1B does not regulate ER/nuclear morphology. Similarly, neither TtNEM1C nor TtNEM1D is required to maintain normal ER morphology. While Tetrahymena PAH1 was shown to functionally replace yeast PAH1 earlier, we observed that Tetrahymena NEM1 homologues did not functionally replace yeast NEM1. Overall, our results suggest the presence of a conserved cascade for regulation of lipid homeostasis and membrane biogenesis in Tetrahymena. Our results also suggest a Nem1-independent function of Pah1 in the regulation of ER morphology in Tetrahymena.     

Immunomodulation by Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Veterinary Species

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) are adult-derived multipotent stem cells that have been derived from almost every tissue. They are classically defined as spindle-shaped, plastic-adherent cells capable of adipogenic, chondrogenic, and osteogenic differentiation. This capacity for trilineage differentiation has been the foundation for research into the use of MSC to regenerate damaged tissues. Recent studies have shown that MSC interact with cells of the immune system and modulate their function. Although many of the details underlying the mechanisms by which MSC modulate the immune system have been defined for human and rodent (mouse and rat) MSC, much less is known about MSC from other veterinary species. This knowledge gap is particularly important because the clinical use of MSC in veterinary medicine is increasing and far exceeds the use of MSC in human medicine. It is crucial to determine how MSC modulate the immune system for each animal species as well as for MSC derived from any given tissue source. A comparative approach provides a unique translational opportunity to bring novel cell-based therapies to the veterinary market as well as enhance the utility of animal models for human disorders. The current review covers what is currently known about MSC and their immunomodulatory functions in veterinary species, excluding laboratory rodents.Abbreviations: AT, adipose tissue; BM, Bone marrow; CB, umbilical cord blood; CT, umbilical cord tissue; DC, dendritic cell; IDO, indoleamine 2;3-dioxygenase; MSC, mesenchymal stem cells; PGE₂, prostaglandin E2; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factorMesenchymal stem cells (MSC, alternatively known as mesenchymal stromal cells) were first reported in the literature in 1968.³⁹ MSC are thought to be of pericyte origin (cells that line the vasculature)^21,22 and typically are isolated from highly vascular tissues. In humans and mice, MSC have been isolated from fat, placental tissues (placenta, Wharton jelly, umbilical cord, umbilical cord blood), hair follicles, tendon, synovial membrane, periodontal ligament, and every major organ (brain, spleen, liver, kidney, lung, bone marrow, muscle, thymus, pancreas, skin).^23,121 For most current clinical applications, MSC are isolated from adipose tissue (AT), bone marrow (BM), umbilical cord blood (CB), and umbilical cord tissue (CT; 11,87,99 Clinical trials in human medicine focus on the use of MSC both for their antiinflammatory properties (graft-versus-host disease, irritable bowel syndrome) and their ability to aid in tissue and bone regeneration in combination with growth factors and bone scaffolds (clinicaltrials.gov).¹³¹ For tissue regeneration, the abilities of MSC to differentiate and to secrete mediators and interact with cells of the immune system likely contribute to tissue healing (Figure 1). The current review will not address the specific use of MSC for orthopedic applications and tissue regeneration, although the topic is covered widely in current literature for both human and veterinary medicine.^57,62,90

Table 1.

Tissues from which MSC have been isolated

Drastic anthocyanin increase in response to <Emphasis Type="Italic">PAP1</Emphasis> overexpression in <Emphasis Type="Italic">fls1</Emphasis> knockout mutant confers enhanced osmotic stress tolerance in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Arabidopsis thaliana</Emphasis>

Key message

pap1 - D/fls1ko double mutant plants that produce substantial amounts of anthocyanin show tolerance to abiotic stress.

Abstract

Anthocyanins are flavonoids that are abundant in various plants and have beneficial effects on both plants and humans. Many genes in flavonoid biosynthetic pathways have been identified, including those in the MYB-bHLH-WD40 (MBW) complex. The MYB gene Production of Anthocyanin Pigment 1 (PAP1) plays a particularly important role in anthocyanin accumulation. PAP1 expression in many plant systems strongly increases anthocyanin levels, resulting in a dark purple color in many plant organs. In this study, we generated double mutant plants that harbor fls1ko in the pap1-D background (i.e., pap1-D/fls1ko plants), to examine whether anthocyanins can be further enhanced by blocking flavonol biosynthesis under PAP1 overexpression. We also wanted to examine whether the increased anthocyanin levels contribute to defense against osmotic stresses. The pap1-D/fls1ko mutants accumulated higher anthocyanin levels than pap1-D plants in both control and sucrose-treated conditions. However, flavonoid biosynthesis genes were slightly down-regulated in the pap1-D/fls1ko seedlings as compared to their expression in pap1-D seedlings. We also report the performance of pap1-D/fls1ko seedlings in response to plant osmotic stresses.