Ovarian responses to progesterone and oestradiol benzoate administered intravaginally during dioestrus in cattle

This study examined the effects of administering progesterone and oestradiol benzoate (ODB) during mid-dioestrus, on ovarian follicular dynamics in cattle. Twelve cycling cows were used in a 4 x 4 latin square design, with the 4 treatments being initiated on Day 13 of the cycle (oestrus = Day 0) and comprising intravaginal insertion for 5 days of: (i) a progesterone releasing device (CIDR; 'P4'); (ii) a CIDR device with a gelatin capsule containing 10 mg ODB and 1 g lactose (CIDIROL; 'P4/ODB') attached; (iii) a placebo CIDR device with the 10 mg ODB capsule (ODB); and, (iv) a placebo CIDR device alone (CTRL). The ovaries of each cow were examined daily by transrectal ultrasonography from Day 7 of the cycle until subsequent ovulation. Blood samples were collected daily from Day 11, and at intervals of 2-4 h during the 24 h period either side of treatment initiation. The second dominant follicle (DF2) emerged on Day 10.7 +/- 0.2 (mean +/- SEM), and was 8.5 +/- 0.2 mm in diameter by Day 13. The DF2 developed through to ovulation (2-wave cycles) in half of the animals in the CTRL group; while in the other half of cases, the ovulatory follicle originated from the third follicle wave that emerged on Day 17.2 +/- 0.4. Administration of a CIDR device alone (P4 group) did not alter the 1:1 ratio of 2 and 3-wave cycles, but the third dominant follicle (DF3) in those cows with 3-wave cycles emerged earlier on Day 15.6 +/- 0.2. In contrast, the DF2 of every animal in the ODB and P4/ODB groups became atretic and was replaced by a DF3 which emerged 4.0 +/- 0.3 days later. The effects of ODB on luteal function were limited to an earlier decline in plasma progesterone concentrations from 2 to 4 days after device insertion and a reduction in diameter of the corpus luteum when administered concurrently with progesterone. Intravaginal administration of 10 mg ODB on Day 13 of the oestrous cycle, with or without progesterone, was effective in promoting follicle wave turnover. In the absence of ODB, progesterone administration alone (P4 group) did not alter the ratio of animals with 2 or 3-wave cycles from that observed in animals in the CTRL group, but did advance the timing of subsequent follicle wave emergence in those animals with 3-wave cycles.     

Effect of treatment with progesterone and oestradiol benzoate on ovarian follicular turnover in postpartum anoestrous cows and cows which have resumed oestrous cycles.

Two experiments were carried out to determine the effect of a low dose of progesterone (P) with and without the addition of an injection of oestradiol benzoate (ODB) on ovarian follicle dynamics, oestradiol production and LH pulsatility in postpartum anoestrous cows, compared with cows which had resumed oestrous cycles (cycling cows). In the first experiment, anoestrous Jersey cows were treated with (AN+P, n=8) or without (AN-3, n=3) a previously used intravaginal progesterone releasing (CIDR) device for 10 days, commencing 3 or 4 days after emergence of a new dominant follicle (DF1) as determined by transrectal ultrasonography. Contemporary cycling cows (CYC+P, n=8) were similarly treated with used CIDR devices and injected with prostaglandin F(2alpha) (PGF) at the time of device insertion. Follicle turnover was monitored by daily ultrasonography and pulsatile release of LH was measured on the ninth day after device insertion. During the period of CIDR device insertion, a second dominant follicle emerged in 4/8 of the CYC+P group and 7/8 of the AN+P group (P=0.14). Maximum diameter of DF1 was greater in cows in the CYC+P compared with the AN+P group (P=0.02), but did not differ between cows in the AN+P and AN-P groups (P>0.1). Frequency of LH pulses was greater in cows in the CYC+P than AN+P group (P=0.06), and in cows in the AN+P than AN-P group (P=0.02).In the second experiment, anoestrous (n=20) and cycling (n=11) Friesian cows were treated with a new CIDR device for 6 days commencing 3 days after emergence of a new dominant follicle (DF1). Cycling cows were also injected with PGF on the day of device insertion. Half of the cows in each group were injected with 2mg ODB on the day of device insertion. Daily ultrasonography was used to monitor follicular dynamics throughout the experimental period. Follicular turnover was increased by ODB in cycling (5/5 versus 1/6; P<0.05), but not anoestrous cows (5/9 versus 4/11). Persistence of DF1 was reduced by ODB treatment in both cycling and anoestrous cows (P<0.001). Maximum diameter of DF1 was influenced by ODB treatment and reproductive status (P<0.05). In anoestrous cows in which a second dominant follicle did not emerge during the period of device insertion, the interval from emergence of DF1 to emergence of a second dominant follicle was significantly delayed by treatment with ODB (P=0.04).In conclusion, P treatment of anoestrous cows increased pulsatile release of LH, but did not induce the development of persistent follicles. Injection of ODB in association with P treatment reduced the persistence of dominant follicles in both cycling and anoestrous cows, but delayed subsequent follicular development in a proportion of anoestrous cows.     

Effect of treatment with progesterone and oestradiol when starting treatment with an intravaginal progesterone releasing insert on ovarian follicular development and hormonal concentrations in Holstein cows

Ovarian follicular development and concentrations of gonadotrophin and steroid hormones were studied in non-lactating Holstein cows following administration of progesterone (P(4)) or oestradiol benzoate (ODB) at the start of treatment with an intravaginal progesterone releasing insert (IVP(4)) in a 2 by 2 factorial experiment. Cows were treated at random stages of the oestrous cycle with an IVP(4) device (Day 0) and either no other treatment (n=8), 200 mg of P(4) IM (n=9), 2.0 mg of ODB IM (n=8) or both P(4) and ODB (n=9). Seven days later devices were removed and PGF(2alpha) was administered. Twenty-four hours later 1.0mg of ODB was administered IM. Oestrus was detected in 97.1% and ovulation in 64.7% (effect of treatment, P=0.41) of cows within 96 h of removing inserts. In the cows that ovulated, day of emergence of the ovulatory follicle was delayed (P<0.01) and more precise (P<0.05) in cows treated with ODB compared to the cows treated with P(4). Interval from wave emergence to ovulation and the diameter of the ovulatory follicle was less (P<0.05) in cows treated with ODB compared to cows treated with P(4). Combined treatment with P(4) and ODB at the time of starting treatment with an IVP(4) device did not significantly change the pattern of ovarian follicular development compared to treatment with ODB alone. Concentrations of LH and FSH in plasma were less in cows treated with ODB between Days 0 and 4 (P<0.05) while treatment with P(4) increased concentrations of FSH in plasma between Days 0 and 4 (P<0.05). When anovulatory cows were compared to ovulatory cows, diameters of follicles (P<0.001) and growth rate of follicles (P<0.01) were less in anovulatory cows between Days 7 and 9, while concentrations of FSH in plasma were greater (P<0.01), concentrations of LH similar (P>0.90) and concentrations of oestradiol were less (P=0.01) in the anovulatory cows between Days 4 and 10. Our findings support a hypothesis that ovarian follicular development following administration of P(4) or ODB at the start of treatment with an IVP(4) device differs. Anovulatory oestrus may have been associated with reduced maturity and/or later emergence of ovarian follicles.     

Ovarian follicular development in Holstein cows following synchronisation of oestrus with oestradiol benzoate and an intravaginal progesterone releasing insert for 5-9 days and duration of the oestrous cycle and concentrations of progesterone following ovulation

The aim of this study was to determine if the duration of treatment with an intravaginal progesterone releasing insert (IVP(4)) after treatment with oestradiol benzoate (ODB) at the time of insertion and 24 h after removal would affect selected variables including: size of ovarian follicles at the time of removal of inserts, diameter of ovulatory follicles, plasma concentrations of progesterone following ovulation, and duration of the following oestrous cycle. Characteristics of oestrus at a synchronised and spontaneous oestrus were also monitored. Non-lactating Holstein cows were synchronised with an IVP(4) for 5 (n = 10), 7 (n = 10), 8 (n = 9) or 9 (n = 9) days together with injections of ODB at device insertion (2 mg) and 24 h after removal (1 mg). Ultrasonography showed no significant effect of treatment on the day of emergence of preovulatory follicles relative to the day of removal of inserts (overall mean = -4.22 +/- 0.58; P = 0.15) for cows that ovulated within 120 h insert removal (n = 36). Treatment with ODB and an IVP(4) for 5 days reduced the diameter of preovulatory follicles at the time of removal of inserts and for the following 2 days compared to cows treated for 7-9 days (mean difference 2.56 +/- 1.15 mm; P = 0.033) but did not reduce the diameter of the ovulatory follicle (P = 0.21). Day of emergence relative to removal of inserts was associated with the diameter of the ovulatory follicle (R2 = 0.69; P < 0.001). Concentrations of progesterone and the diameter of the corpus luteum following ovulation were not affected by treatment (P > 0.20), but were affected by the diameter of the ovulatory follicle (P < 0.01). Diameter of the ovulatory follicle did not affect interoestrous and interovulatory intervals (P > 0.40). We conclude that treatment with an IVP(4) for 5 compared to 7-9 days with ODB administered at device insertion, and 24 h after removal reduced the diameter of preovulatory follicles at the time of removal of the insert but did not reduce the diameter of the ovulatory follicle or concentrations of progesterone in plasma. Emergence of preovulatory follicles closer to the time of removal of inserts reduced the diameter of the ovulatory follicle when oestrus was induced with ODB. Ovulation of smaller follicles reduced concentrations of progesterone in plasma following ovulation but did not affect oestrous cycle duration.     

Effect of oestradiol benzoate given after prostaglandin at two stages of follicle wave development on oestrus synchronisation,the LH surge and ovulation in heifers

Oestrus synchronization following prostaglandin-induced luteolysis is variable and dependent on follicle wave status in cattle. Oestradiol benzoate (ODB) has been used following prostaglandin to reduce the interval to oestrus and ovulation, but the effect of follicle wave status at the time of ODB administration is not clear. The aim of this study was to characterize the endocrine and follicular responses following ODB after luteolysis at different stages of the follicle wave. Prostaglandin was administered at either emergence or dominance of the second follicle wave. Twenty-four hours later animals received either 0.5mg ODB in oil or a control oil injection. Follicular development was monitored daily by ultrasonography, oestrous behavior was determined and blood samples were collected. In animals treated with ODB at emergence, there was a reduction (P<0.05) in the maximum diameter of the ovulatory follicle (11.7+/-1.2 mm versus 13.1+/-0.1 mm) and in the interval from prostaglandin to oestrus (52.0+/-2.3 h versus 88.0+/-9.6h), to the LH surge (53.3+/-3.5 h versus 89.1+/-6.5 h) and to ovulation (96+/-0.0 h versus 129.6+/-9.6h), compared with controls. In animals treated with ODB at dominance, there was a reduction (P<0.05) in the interval from prostaglandin to the LH surge (54.0+/-3.1 h versus 70.9+/-4.8 h), but not in the interval from prostaglandin to oestrus (53.3+/-2.7 h versus 65.7+/-4.5 h; P=0.11), to ovulation (96.0+/-0.0 h versus 110.4+/-4.8 h; P=0.12) or the maximum diameter of the ovulatory follicle (12.7+/-0.3 mm versus 13.6+/-0.4 mm; P=0.12), compared with controls. Treatment did not affect (P>0.05) the length of the subsequent oestrous cycle or corpus luteum size. In conclusion, the use of ODB advanced, but did not alter the temporal relationships among oestrus, the LH surge and ovulation, regardless of stage of follicle development at treatment.     

Body condition influences maintenance of a persistent first wave dominant follicle in dairy cattle

The objective of this study was to determine whether plasma concentrations of progesterone (P4) from a controlled internal drug releasing (CIDR) device (approximately 2 ng/ml) were adequate to sustain a persistent first wave dominant follicle (FWDF) in low body condition (LBC, body condition score [BCS] 1 = lean, 5 = fat [2.3 +/- 0.72, n = 4]) compared with high body condition (HBC, BCS = 4.4 +/- 0.12, n = 4) nonlactating dairy cows. On Day 7 of the estrous cycle (Day 0 = estrus), cows were treated with PGF2 alpha (25 mg i.m. Lutalyse, P.M., and Day 8 A.M.) and a used CIDR device containing P4 (1.2 g) was inserted into the vagina until ovulation or Day 16. Plasma was collected for P4 and estradiol (E2) analyses from Day 5 to Day 18 (or ovulation), and ovarian follicles were monitored daily by ultrasonography. Mean concentrations of plasma P4 were greater in HBC than LBC cows between Days 5 and 7 (4.6 > 3.4 +/- 0.37 ng/ml; P < 0.04). All LBC cows maintained the first wave dominant follicle and ovulated after removal of the CIDR device (18.3 +/- 0.3 d, n = 3; Cow 4 lost the CIDR device on Day 11 and ovulated on Day 15), whereas in the HBC cows ovulation occurred during the period of CIDR exposure (11.3 +/- 0.3 d; n = 3; a fourth cow developed a luteinized first wave dominant follicle that did not ovulate during the experimental protocol on Day 19). Mean day of estrus was 17 +/- 0.4 for LBC (n = 3) and 10 +/- 0.4 for HBC (n = 3) cows. Sustained concentrations of plasma E2 (12.9 +/- 2.8 pg/ml; Days 8 to 17) in LBC cows reflected presence of an active persistent first wave dominant follicle. The differential effect of BCS on concentrations of plasma P4 (y = ng/ml) was reflected by the difference (P < 0.01) in regressions: yLBC = 19.9 - 3.49x + 0.166x2 vs yHBC = 37.3 - 7.04x + 0.340x2 (x = day of cycle, Days 7 to 12). Although P4 concentration was greater for HBC cows prior to Day 8, a greater clearance of plasma P4 released from the CIDR device in the absence of a CL altered follicular dynamics, leading to premature ovulation in the HBC cows. A greater basal concentration of P4 was sustained in LBC cows that permitted maintenance of a persistent first wave dominant follicle.     

Effects of maturity of the potential ovulatory follicle on induction of oestrus and ovulation in cattle with oestradiol benzoate

The effect of maturity of the dominant follicle (DF) on the capacity of oestradiol benzoate (ODB) to induce oestrus and ovulation was examined in cattle. In experiment 1, 31 prepubertal heifers each received an intravaginal progesterone insert (IPI) and 1mg ODB i.m./500kg BW (ODB1). Daily ovarian ultrasonography detected emergence of a new follicular wave 3.1+/-0.1 days after ODB1. The IPI was removed when newly emerged DF were "young" (1.3+/-0.1 days after emergence; YDF; n=15) or "mature" (4.2+/-0.1 days; MDF; n=16), and 24h later, heifers received 0.75mg ODB/500kg BW (ODB2; n=16) or no further treatment (NoODB2; n=15). Most of the heifers receiving ODB2 were observed in oestrus (15/16) and ovulated (12/16), as compared to 0/15 and 1/15 in the NoODB2 group, respectively (P<0.01). In experiment 2, 32 heifers received ODB1 on day 6 of the oestrous cycle, and new follicular wave emergence was detected 3.2+/-0.1 days later. Heifers received an injection of prostaglandin-F2alpha (PGF) when the DF was young (1.1+/-0.1 days after emergence; YDF; n=16) or mature (4 days; MDF; n=16), and then ODB2 24h later or no further treatment (NoODB2). The interval from PGF to oestrus was greater (P<0.01) in the YDF-NoODB2 (70+/-3.9h) as compared to MDF-NoODB2 group (57+/-1.8h). Inclusion of ODB2 reduced (P<0.01) this interval to 47.0+/-0.7h without regard to the maturity of the DF (maturityxODB2, P<0.05) and also reduced (P<0.05) the interval to ovulation. In experiment 3, 21 suckling anoestrous cows received an IPI and ODB1 at 29.3+/-1.7 days postpartum. The IPI were removed either 1 day (YDF; n=9) or 3.9+/-0.1 days (MDF; n=9) after emergence of a new follicular wave and every cow received ODB2. Oestrus was subsequently detected in all but one animal. Ovulation of the newly emerged DF was detected within 48h of ODB2 in nine of nine cows of the MDF group, and in four of nine of the YDF group (P<0.05). During the subsequent ovulatory cycle, luteal size and plasma concentrations of progesterone were greater (P<0.01) in the MDF group compared to the YDF group. We conclude that behavioural oestrus is readily induced by 0.75mg ODB i.m./500kg BW. Maturity of the DF appeared to have little influence on the ability of the DF to ovulate in heifers. In contrast, young DF in lactating anoestrous cows were less likely to respond to the ovulatory cue provided, and luteal development was compromised in those that did ovulate.     

The effect of subluteal levels of exogenous progesterone on follicular dynamics and endocrine patterns during early luteal phase of the ewe

Nineteen Corriedale ewes were treated with an im dose of a PGF2alpha during the luteal phase to synchronize estrus. After ovulation had been detected by using ultrasonography (Day 0); the ewes were randomly assigned to 2 different groups. In 11 ewes a CIDR, which had previously been used for 10 d, was inserted on the fourth day after ovulation. The ewes then received a dose of PGF2alpha on Day 5 to induce luteolysis. The CIDR remained in place until the end of the experiment (Day 9). Control ewes (n = 8) received no treatment. Blood samples were taken daily for estradiol, progesterone and FSH determinations. In the untreated ewes, 2 follicular waves were detected in all of the animals throughout the monitoring period, with a mean wave interval of 4.5 d. The total number of follicles which were > or =2 mm decreased from Day 0 to Day 4 (8.8+/-1.0 to 5.3+/-0.6; P< or =0.05) and then increased at Day 7 (7.5+/-0.9; P< or =0.05). The growth profiles of both the largest and the second largest follicles of Wave 1 showed significant divergence, while no divergence was observed in Wave 2. Serum estradiol concentrations decreased significantly from the day before to the day of ovulation and then increased again during the growing phase of the largest follicle of Wave 1. Concentrations of FSH were high on the day of emergence of both waves, but while a significant decline was observed after emergence in Wave 1, the levels remained high in Wave 2. In 8 of the 11 treated ewes, the largest follicle of Wave 1 was still present on the ninth day after ovulation (persistent follicle). In the other 3 ewes, the largest follicle of Wave 1 was already regressing on the day that the treatment was administered, and the largest follicle that was present on Day 9 originated from Wave 2 (nonpersistent follicle). In persistent follicle ewes, the largest follicle of Wave 1 prolonged its lifespan significantly, attaining the maximum diameter (Day 8.1+/-0.8) later than in untreated (Day 3.0+/-0.4) and nonpersisted follicle ewes (Day 2.0+/-0.6). The total number of follicles decreased in persistent follicle ewes between Day 0 and Day 4 (7.9+/-1.5 to 4.5+/-0.5, respectively; P< or =0.05) and remained low until the end of the experiment. Progesterone concentrations (nmol/L) between Days 6 and 9 were significantly different between untreated and persistent follicle ewes (12.8+/-1.0 vs. 9.4+/-1.0, P< or =0.02). The present study confirms that the largest follicle of Wave 1 is dominant in the ewe and that subluteal progesterone concentrations can prolong its lifespan and extend this dominance.     

Effect of early luteolysis in progesterone-based timed AI protocols in Bos indicus, Bos indicus x Bos taurus, and Bos taurus heifers

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of treatment with an intravaginal progesterone-releasing device (CIDR) and estradiol benzoate (EB) on follicular dynamics in Bos indicus (n=23), Bos taurus (n=25), and cross-bred (n=23) heifers. To assess the influence of reduced serum progesterone concentrations during 8 days of treatment with a progesterone-releasing device on follicular dynamics, half of the heifers received PGF at CIDR insertion (Day 0; 3 x 2 factorial design). Mean (+/-S.E.M.) serum progesterone concentrations during CIDR treatment varied (P<0.05) among genetic groups: B. indicus (5.4+/-0.1 ng/mL), B. taurus (3.3+/-0.0 ng/mL), and cross-bred (4.3+/-0.1 ng/mL). Maximum diameter of the dominant follicle (DF) was smaller (P<0.01) in B. indicus heifers (9.5+/-0.5 mm) than in cross-bred (12.3+/-0.4 mm) or B. taurus heifers (11.6+/-0.5 mm). B. indicus experienced lower (P<0.01) ovulation rate (39.1%) than did B. taurus (72.7%) and cross-bred (84.0%). Heifers treated with PGF on Day 0 had lower (P<0.05) serum progesterone concentrations during progesterone treatment. The PGF treatment on Day 0 increased (P<0.01) the diameter of the DF (11.9+/-0.4 mm vs. 10.5+/-0.4 mm). Moreover, greater (P=0.02) ovulation rates (78.8 vs. 54.0%) occurred in heifers treated with PGF on Day 0. In summary, B. indicus heifers had greater serum progesterone concentrations, smaller DF diameter, and a lower ovulation rate compared to B. taurus heifers. Prostaglandin treatment on the day of CIDR insertion reduced serum progesterone during treatment, and resulted in increased maximum DF diameter and ovulation rate.     

Comparison of three methods of acute administration of progesterone on ovarian follicular development and the timing and synchrony of ovulation in Bos indicus heifers

The aim of this study was to induce the formation of a persistent dominant ovarian follicle and to compare the effects of 3 methods of acute administration of P4 on ovarian follicular development and on the timing and synchrony of ovulation. Stage of the estrous cycle was initially synchronized in Bos indicus heifers with a norgestomet implants (3 mg) for 10 d and with an analogue of PGF2 alpha (15 mg) on the first and last day of norgestomet treatment. Eight days after removal of the implants, heifers were randomly assigned to 4 groups. All heifers received a norgestomet implant (Day 0), which was removed 17 d later (Day 17); PGF2 alpha was administered on Days 0 and 4. Heifers in the control group (n = 5) received no other treatment. On Day 10 heifers in Group P4C (n = 5) were treated with a CIDR for 24 h; heifers in Group P4O (n = 5) were administered 100 mg i.m. of P4 in oil, while heifers in Group P4S (n = 5) were administered 100 mg i.m. of P4 in saline/alcohol. Data were analyzed using bootstrap estimates of location (mean) and spread (standard deviation; SD). Compared with the control heifers, day of emergence of the ovulatory follicle was delayed, and age and duration of dominance of the ovulatory follicle were reduced in the P4C and P4O heifers (P < 0.05) but not in the P4S heifers (P > 0.05). In all groups treated with P4 both the mean and variability (SD) in the timing of ovulation did not differ with that of the control group (P > 0.05) but there was less variability in the day of emergence, age, duration of dominance and diameter of the ovulatory follicle than in the control group (P < 0.05). Delayed timing and reduced synchrony (SD) of ovulation and greater age of the ovulatory follicle (P < 0.05) occurred in P4S heifers than in P4C heifers. We conclude that administration of 100 mg of P4 in oil is as effective as treatment with a CIDR for synchronizing emergence and ovulation of a newly recruited dominant follicle. However, reduced synchrony of ovulation, greater age of the ovulatory follicle and delayed timing of ovulation occurred following administration 100 mg of P4 in saline/alcohol compared with the CIDR device.     

Neither plasma progesterone concentrations nor exogenous eCG affects rates of ovulation or pregnancy in fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI) protocols for puberal Nellore heifers

The objective was to evaluate the effects of plasma progesterone (P4) concentrations and exogenous eCG on ovulation and pregnancy rates of pubertal Nellore heifers in fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI) protocols. In Experiment 1 (Exp. 1), on Day 0 (7 d after ovulation), heifers (n = 15) were given 2 mg of estradiol benzoate (EB) im and randomly allocated to receive: an intravaginal progesterone-releasing device containing 0.558 g of P4 (group 0.5G, n = 4); an intravaginal device containing 1 g of P4 (group 1G, n = 4); 0.558 g of P4 and PGF_2α (PGF; 150 μg d-cloprostenol, group 0.5G/PGF, n = 4); or 1 g of P4 and PGF (group 1G/PGF, n = 3). On Day 8, PGF was given to all heifers and intravaginal devices removed; 24 h later (Day 9), all heifers were given 1 mg EB im. In Exp. 2, pubertal Nellore heifers (n = 292) were treated as in Exp. 1, with FTAI on Day 10 (30 to 36 h after EB). In Exp. 3, pubertal heifers (n = 459) received the treatments described for groups 0.5G/PGF and 1G/PGF and were also given 300 IU of eCG im (groups 0.5G/PGF/eCG and 1G/PGF/eCG) at device removal (Day 8). In Exp. 1, plasma P4 concentrations were significantly higher in heifers that received 1.0 vs 0.588 g P4, and were significantly lower in heifers that received PGF on Day 0. In Exp. 2 and 3, there were no significant differences among groups in rates of ovulation (65-77%) or pregnancy (Exp. 2: 26-33%; Exp. 3: 39-43%). In Exp. 3, diameter of the dominant ovarian follicle on Day 9 was larger in heifers given 0.558 g vs 1.0 g P4 (10.3 ± 0.2 vs 9.3 ± 0.2 mm; P < 0.01). In conclusion, lesser amounts of P4 in the intravaginal device or PGF on Day 0 decreased plasma P4 from Days 1 to 8 and increased diameter of the dominant follicle on Day 9. However, neither of these nor 300 IU of eCG on Day 8 significantly increased rates of ovulation or pregnancy.     

Ovarian dynamics, serum estradiol and progesterone concentrations during the interovulatory interval in goats

Ovarian changes determined by daily transrectal ultrasonic scanning, and its correlation with serum progesterone (P4) and estradiol (E2) concentrations were studied in seven cyclic Saanen goats. Estrous cycles were synchronized with 2 injections of a PGF2 alpha analogue 9 d apart. All follicles > or = 2 mm in diameter and CL were measured each day. One goat showed a longer interestrous interval, associated with development of a cystic-luteinized structure. The mean interovulatory interval for the other 6 goats was 20.8 +/- 0.4 d. The incidence of goats with 4, 3, and 2 follicular waves was 3, 1 and 2 respectively; follicular waves emerged on Days 0.5 +/- 0.6, 7.2 +/- 0.7, 10.7 +/- 0.5 and 13.7 +/- 0.8 for Wave 1, 2, 3 and the Ovulatory wave, respectively. The largest follicle of Wave 2 was smaller (4.9 +/- 0.1 mm) than the largest follicles of Wave 3 (6.2 +/- 0.1 mm; P < or = 0.01) and of the Ovulatory wave (7.0 +/- 0.5 mm; P < or = 0.01), and tended to be smaller than the largest follicle of Wave 1 (6.3 +/- 0.6 mm; P < or = 0.09). Interval between emergence of Wave 1 and Wave 2 was longer than interval between emergence of Wave 2 and Wave 3 (7.3 +/- 0.9 d vs 4.0 +/- 0.4 d; P < or = 0.01), and between Wave 3 and the Ovulatory wave (3.8 +/- 1.1 d; P < or = 0.05). Two days before ovulation, the diameter of the ovulatory follicle was larger (P < or = 0.01) than the first subordinate follicle. Serum E2 concentrations increased from the day of ovulation (2.7 +/- 0.3 pg/mL) to Day 2 (7.6 +/- 0.9 pg/mL; P < or = 0.01), associated with the early-mid growing phase of the largest follicle of Wave 1, and then decreased to basal levels on Day 5 (P < or = 0.01) and peaked again (16.5 +/- 2.4 pg/mL) 2 d before ovulation. The CL were detected ultrasonically on Day 3 post ovulation and attained a mean maximum diameter of 13.5 +/- 0.8 mm between Days 8 and 14. The following characteristics were observed: 1) ovarian follicular development in goats is wave-like; 2) increased P4 concentrations may be promoting follicular wave turnover; 3) it is suggested that the presence of follicular dominance and the production of E2 are different among waves. While in Wave 1 and in the Ovulatory wave, follicular dominance is present and production of E2 is consistent, no changes in serum E2 concentrations were found in other stages of the interovulatory interval. In the intervening waves, no indicators of follicular dominance could be firmly documented.     

Ovarian follicular development following administration of progesterone or aspiration of ovarian follicles in Holstein cows

The objective of this study was to compare the effects of administration of a single injection of progesterone (P4) and follicle aspiration on Day 7 of the estrous cycle on the timing and synchrony of follicular wave emergence, time of ovulation, and concentrations of P4, estradiol and FSH in Holstein cows. Twenty cows were assigned to 4 groups (n=5 cows per group) in a 2 by 2 factorial arrangement. Cows were treated on Day 7 (Day 0 = estrus) of the estrous cycle with either sham follicular aspiration and an oil vehicle administered intramuscularly (control), aspiration of ovarian follicles (aspiration), 200 mg of P4 im, or aspiration and 200 mg of P4 im (aspiration + P4). On Day 11, PGF(2alpha)(25mg) was administered to all groups. Synchrony of ovulation was less variable in each of the treatment groups compared with the control group (P<0.05), whereas ovulation was delayed in cows in the P4 group (P<0.05). Day of follicular wave emergence was delayed in the cows of the P4 group compared with cows in the aspiration and aspiration + P4 groups (P<0.01), whereas variability in wave emergence was less among both groups of aspirated cows compared with the cows in the control group (P<0.01). More follicles 4 to 7 mm in diameter were detected in the 2 aspiration groups compared with the cows in the control and P4 group (P<0.05). No difference was detected among groups in the maximum concentration of FSH associated with follicular wave emergence. We conclude that both the administration of P4 and the aspiration of follicles on Day 7 of the estrous cycle improves the synchrony of ovulation when luteolysis is induced on Day 11 and results in similar concentrations of FSH at the time of follicular wave emergence, but the timing of wave emergence and the number of follicles post-emergence differ.     

Effects of buserelin injection and deslorelin (GnRH-agonist) implants on plasma progesterone, LH, accessory CL formation, follicle and corpus luteum dynamics in Holstein cows

The influence of Buserelin injection and Deslorelin (a GnRH analogue) implants administered on Day 5 of the estrous cycle on plasma concentrations of LH and progesterone (P4), accessory CL formation, and follicle and CL dynamics was examined in nonlactating Holstein cows. On Day 5 (Day 1 = ovulation) following a synchronized estrus, 24 cows were assigned randomly (n = 4 per group) to receive 2 mL saline, i.m. (control), 8 micrograms, i.m. Buserelin or a subcutaneous Deslorelin (DES) implant in concentrations of 75 micrograms, 150 micrograms, 700 micrograms or 2100 micrograms. Blood samples were collected (for LH assay) at 30-min intervals for 2 h before and 12 h after GnRH-treatment from cows assigned to Buserelin, DES-700 micrograms and DES-2100 micrograms treatments and thereafter at 4-h intervals for 48 h. Beginning 24 h after treatment, ovaries were examined by ultrasound at 2-h intervals until ovulation was confirmed. Thereafter, ultrasonography and blood sampling (for P4 assay) was performed daily until a spontaneous ovulation before Day 45. A greater release of LH occurred in response to Deslorelin implants than to Buserelin injection (P < 0.01). Basal levels of LH between 12 and 48 h were higher in DES-700 micrograms group than in DES-2100 micrograms and Buserelin (P < 0.05). The first wave dominant follicle ovulated in all cows following GnRH treatment. Days to CL regression did not differ between treatments, but return to estrus was delayed (44.2 vs 27.2 d; P < 0.01) in cows of DES-2100 micrograms group. All GnRH treatments elevated plasma P4 concentrations, and the highest P4 responses were observed in the DES-700 micrograms and DES-2100 micrograms groups. The second follicular wave emerged earlier in GnRH-treated than in control cows (9.9 vs 12.8 d; P < 0.01). However, emergence of the third dominant follicle was delayed in cows of DES-2100 micrograms treatment (37.0 d) compared with DES-700 micrograms (22.2 d), Buserelin (17.8 d) or control (19.0 d). In conclusion, Deslorelin implants of 700 micrograms increased plasma P4 and LH concentrations and slightly delayed the emergence of the third dominant follicle. On the contrary, Deslorelin implants of 2100 micrograms drastically altered the P4 profiles and follicle dynamics.     

Influence of deslorelin (GnRH-agonist) implant on plasma progesterone, first wave dominant follicle and pregnancy in dairy cattle

The objectives of this study were to investigate the effect of a synthetic GnRH-agonist (Deslorelin) implant on CL function and follicle dynamics when administered 48 h after PGF2 alpha, in a timed-insemination protocol, and to determine if the incorporation of a Deslorelin implant into a timed-insemination protocol to synchronize ovulation would be beneficial to the establishment of pregnancy. In Experiment 1, 15 non lactating cyclic Holstein cows received Buserelin (8 micrograms, i.m.) on Day-9, Lutalyse (25 mg, i.m.) on Day-2, and then on Day 0 received either a Deslorelin implant (700 micrograms, s.c.; n = 5), Buserelin (8 micrograms, i.m.; n = 5), or no treatment (control; n = 5). Blood samples were collected on Days-9, -2, 0 and thereafter daily until the next ovulation. Ovaries were scanned by ultrasound on Days-9, -2, 0, 1 (day of ovulation) and 3 times a week thereafter until a subsequent ovulation. From Days 0 to 15, the rate of increase of plasma progesterone (P4) was greater (P < 0.01) for Deslorelin than for control and Buserelin. Establishment of the first-wave dominant follicle (FWDF) as a Class 3 (> 9 mm) follicle was delayed (P < 0.01) with Deslorelin (14.2 +/- 1.3 d) compared with the control (4.6 +/- 1.3 d) and Buserelin (5.0 +/- 1.5 d) treatments. The FWDF resumed growth after Day 13 in all 5 Deslorelin-treated cows, and 2 cows ovulated spontaneously. In 1 Deslorelin-treated cow, the FWDF regressed, and a second-wave dominant follicle ovulated, while 2 other Deslorelin cows failed to ovulate until after Day 36. The cumulative numbers of Class 2 and 3 follicles was lowest in the Deslorelin group (P < 0.01), while the cumulative number of Class 1 follicles was highest (Deslorelin > Buserelin > Control; P < 0.01). The number of days to CL-regression and days to subsequent estrus did not differ (P > 0.05) among treatments. In Experiment II, 16 lactating potentially subfertile (body condition score 2.25) cows received Cystorelin (100 micrograms, i.m.; Day-9), Lutalyse (25 mg, i.m.; Day-2), and either a Cystorelin injection (100 micrograms, i.m.; n = 8) or Deslorelin implant (700 micrograms, s.c.; n = 8) on Day 0 and inseminated 16 h later. Deslorelin-treated cows had a higher plasma P4 concentration between Days 0 and 16 (P < 0.05) than the 2 other groups, and 5 of the 8 cows in this group were pregnant (Day 45, palpation) compared with 1 of 8 cows in the Cystorelin group (P < 0.05). Incorporation of a Deslorelin implant into a timed-insemination protocol enhanced the pregnancy rate in cows of poor body condition. The results support the hypothesis that enhanced CL function and delayed establishment of the first-wave dominant follicle may enhance embryo survival.     

Ovarian responses in Bos indicus heifers treated to synchronise ovulation with intravaginal progesterone releasing devices, oestradiol benzoate, prostaglandin F(2α) and equine chorionic gonadotrophin

The objectives were: (i) improve understanding of the ovarian responses of Bos indicus heifers treated with different ovulation synchronisation protocols, (ii) compare ovarian responses of B. indicus heifers treated with intravaginal progesterone releasing device (IPRD)+oestradiol benzoate (ODB) versus a conventional prostaglandin F(2α) (PGF(2α)) protocol and (iii) investigate whether reducing the amount of progesterone (P(4)) in the IPRD, and treatment with equine chorionic gonadotrophin (eCG) would increase the proportion of heifers with normal ovarian function during the synchronised and return cycles. Two-year-old Brahman (n=30) and Brahman-cross (n=34) heifers were randomly allocated to three IPRD-treatment groups: (i) standard-dose IPRD (Cue-Mate(?) 1.56g P(4); n=17); (ii) half-dose IPRD (Cue-Mate(?) 0.78g P(4); n=15); (iii) half-dose IPRD+300IU eCG at IPRD removal (n=14), and a non-IPRD control group (iv) 2×PGF(2α) (500μg cloprostenol) on Days -16 and -2 (n=18). IPRD-treated heifers received 250μg cloprostenol at IPRD insertion (Day -10) and IPRD removal (Day -2) and 1mg ODB on Days -10 and -1. Ovarian function was evaluated by ultrasonography and plasma P(4) throughout the synchronised and return cycles. The mean diameter of the dominant follicle observed at 54-56h after IPRD removal, was greater for heifers which ovulated than heifers which did not ovulate (P<0.001; 14.5±1.1 vs. 9.3±0.6mm, respectively). The prevalence of IPRD-treated heifers with ovarian dysfunction (persistent CL, failure to re-ovulate, shortened luteal phase) was 39%. This relatively high prevalence of ovarian dysfunction may explain the commonly reported, lower than expected pregnancy rates to FTAI in B. indicus heifers treated to synchronise ovulation.     

Effect of artificial insemination on submission rates of lactating dairy cows synchronised and resynchronised with intravaginal progesterone releasing devices and oestradiol benzoate

This study investigated the hypothesis that a reduction in submission rates at a resynchronised oestrus is not due to the resynchrony treatment involving intravaginal progesterone releasing devices (IVDs) and oestradiol benzoate (ODB) but is associated with artificial insemination (AI) at the first synchronised oestrus. In Experiment 1, cows were synchronised for first oestrus with IVDs, with ODB administered at the time of device insertion (Day 0, 2 mg IM) and 24 h after removal (Day 9, 1 mg IM) and PGF(2alpha) injected at the time of device removal. Cows were then either inseminated (I) for 4 days or not inseminated (NI) following detection of oestrus (first round of AI). Every animal was resynchronised for a second round of AI by reinsertion of IVDs on Day 23 with administration of ODB (1 mg IM) at the time of insertion as well as 24 h after removal (Day 32). Cows detected in oestrus and inseminated for 4 days at the second round of AI were resynchronised for a third round by repeating the resynchrony treatment starting on Day 46 and inseminating cows on detection of oestrus for 4 days. In Experiment 2 the same oestrous synchronisation and resynchronisation treatments were used, but the timing of treatments differed. The cows had their cycles either presynchronised (treatment start Day -23) without AI and then resynchronised, starting on Day 0, for the first round of AI for AI at detected oestrus for 4 days, or they were synchronised (treatment start Day 0) for the first round of AI. In Experiment 1, 91.4% (64/70) and 92.6% (63/68) (P = 0.79) of cows in the I and NI treatments, respectively, were detected in oestrus after the initial synchronisation. At the second round of AI, submission rates for insemination were lower in the I group compared to the NI cows (74.5%, 35/47 versus 92.6%, 63/68, respectively; P = 0.007). Pregnancy rates (proportion treated that were classified as becoming pregnant) in I and NI cows 4 weeks (61.4%, 43/70 versus 63.2%, 43/68) and 7 weeks (77.1%, 54/70 versus 69.1%, 47/68) after the AI start date (AISD) did not differ significantly between treatments. In Experiment 2, presynchronisation and then resynchronisation of oestrous cycles before the first round of AI did not affect oestrous detection rates at the first round of AI (100%, 44/44 versus 98.0%, 50/51; P = 0.54), or pregnancy rates 1 week (63.6%, 28/44 versus 60.8%, 31/51; P = 0.70), 4 weeks (72.7%, 32/44 versus 76.5%, 39/51; P = 0.76) and 7 weeks (81.8%, 36/44 versus 88.2%, 45/51; P = 0.40) after AISD compared to cows that had their cycles synchronised for the first round of AI. These findings support our hypothesis that a reduction in submission rates at a resynchronised oestrus is associated with AI at the first synchronised oestrus and not due to a resynchrony treatment involving IVDs and ODB. This study supports the concept that early embryonic loss following AI at a synchronised oestrus could cause a reduction in submission rates following resynchronisation of oestrus, although investigation of the effect of passing an AI catheter or semen components were not studied per se.     

Hormonal and ovarian responses to a 5-day progesterone treatment in anoestrous dairy cows in the third week post-partum

Primiparous cows with low body condition at calving have an extended anovulatory period. Induction of ovulation and oestrus is possible with progesterone treatment but the response to this treatment differs between Friesian and Jersey breeds. The objective of this study was to describe changes in pulsatile LH secretion and the synchrony of developing ovarian follicles that occur during a progesterone treatment period of 5 days in primiparous anovulatory cows. The experimental model compared the progesterone treatment with spontaneous post-partum changes as well as a breed comparison in a factorial design.Thirty-six cows (Jersey n=19 and Friesian n=17) were managed to calve with a low body condition score (BCS<4. 5). Daily changes in ovarian follicle size were observed with transrectal ultrasonography in each cow from 8 days post-partum. Thirty of these cows were diagnosed to be anovulatory at 12-18 days post-partum (day 0) and allocated to a treatment (n=16) or a control group (n=14), balanced for breed. Each treated cow had a progesterone-releasing controlled internal drug-releasing (CIDR) device inserted vaginally for 5 days while control cows were left untreated. Changes in plasma LH concentrations were measured with intensive blood sampling over 8 h on days -1, 1, and 4. Blood samples were also collected daily (06:00 h) for determination of plasma progesterone as well as oestradiol concentrations on days 6 and 8.Treatment with progesterone was associated with a transient initial decrease (day 1) in both LH pulse frequency and mean LH concentrations after device insertion, but both had returned to pre-treatment levels by day 4. Jersey cows had a greater pulse frequency, but there was no breed difference in mean LH concentrations. Patterns of ovarian follicle growth were affected by progesterone treatment with an increase in diameter of the dominant follicle (DF) identified after treatment initiation. This followed an earlier emergence of a new DF after device insertion. Follicular response to progesterone was dependent on the diameter of the DF present at treatment initiation. Those follicles >/=9 mm were replaced by a new DF during treatment such that the DF observed at the time of device removal was large (>/=9 mm) and growing in 13/16 cases.Progesterone was not effective for the induction of an LH surge, ovulation and oestrus in anovulatory cows with a low BCS. However, treatment was associated with synchronous development of a DF so that it was large and growing at the end of the treatment period in most cases. This synchronous development may be due to the transient suppression of LH and the presence of an LH-dependent DF.     

Dynamics of follicular growth and progesterone concentrations in cyclic and anestrous suckling Nelore cows (Bos indicus) treated with progesterone,equine chorionic gonadotropin,or temporary calf removal

The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of eCG and temporary calf removal (TCR) associated with progesterone (P4) treatment on the dynamics of follicular growth, CL size, and P4 concentrations in cyclic (n = 36) and anestrous (n = 30) Nelore cows. Cyclic (C) and anestrous (A) cows were divided into three groups. The control group received 2 mg of estradiol benzoate via intramuscular (IM) injection and an intravaginal device containing 1.9 g of P4 on Day 0. On Day 8, the device was removed, and the animals received 12.5 mg of dinoprost tromethamine IM. After 24 hours, the animals received 1 mg of estradiol benzoate IM. In the eCG group, cows received the same treatment described for the control group but also received 400 UI of eCG at the time of device removal. In the TCR group, calves were separated from the cows for 56 hours after device removal. Ultrasound exams were performed every 24 hours after device removal until the time of ovulation and 12 days after ovulation to measure the size of the CL. On the same day as the CL measurement, blood was collected to determine the plasma P4 level. Statistical analyses were performed with a significance level of P ≤ 0.05. In cyclic cows, the presence of the CL at the beginning of protocol resulted in a smaller follicle diameter at the time of device removal (7.4 ± 0.3 mm in cows with CL vs. 8.9 ± 0.4 mm in cows without CL; P = 0.03). All cows ovulated within 72 hours after device removal. Anestrous cows treated with eCG or TCR showed follicle diameter at fixed-timed artificial insemination (A-eCG 10.2 ± 0.3 and A-TCR 10.3 ± 0.5 mm) and follicular growth rate (A-eCG 1.5 ± 0.2 and A-TCR 1.3 ± 0.1 mm/day) similar to cyclic cows (C-eCG 11.0 ± 0.6 and C-TCR 12.0 ± 0.5 mm) and (C-eCG 1.4 ± 0.2 and C-TCR 1.6 ± 0.2 mm/day, respectively; P ≤ 0.05). Despite the similarities in CL size, the average P4 concentration was higher in the A-TCR (9.6 ± 1.4 ng/mL) than in the A-control (4.0 ± 1.0 ng/mL) and C-TCR (4.4 ± 1.0 ng/mL) groups (P < 0.05). From these results, we conclude that eCG treatment and TCR improved the fertility of anestrous cows by providing follicular growth rates and size of dominant follicles similar to cyclic cows. Additionally, TCR increases the plasma concentrations of P4 in anestrous cows.     

Temporal associations among ovarian events in cattle during oestrous cycles with two and three follicular waves

For 18 two-wave interovulatory intervals in heifers, the follicular waves were first detected on Days -0.2 +/- 0.1 and 9.6 +/- 0.2, and for 4 three-wave intervals on Days -0.5 +/- 0.3, 9.0 +/- 0.0 and 16.0 +/- 1.1 (ovulation is Day 0). The day-to-day mean diameter profile of the dominant follicle of the 1st wave and the day of emergence of the 2nd wave were not significantly different between 2-wave and 3-wave intervals. There were no indications, therefore, that events occurring during the first half of the interovulatory interval were associated with the later emergence of a 3rd wave. The dominant ovulatory follicle differed significantly (P less than 0.05 at least) between 2-wave and 3-wave intervals in day of emergence (Day 9.6 +/- 0.2 and 16.0 +/- 1.1), length of interval from emergence of follicle to ovulation (10.9 +/- 0.4 and 6.8 +/- 0.6 days), and diameter on day before ovulation (16.5 +/- 0.4 and 13.9 +/- 0.4 mm). The mean length of 2-wave interovulatory intervals (20.4 +/- 0.3 days) was shorter (P less than 0.01) than for 3-wave intervals (22.8 +/- 0.6 days). The mean day of luteal regression for 2-wave and 3-wave intervals was 16.5 +/- 0.4 and 19.2 +/- 0.5 (P less than 0.01). For all intervals, luteal regression occurred after emergence of the ovulatory wave, and the next wave did not emerge until near the day of ovulation at the onset of the subsequent interovulatory interval. In conclusion, the emergence of a 3rd wave was associated with a longer luteal phase, and the viable dominant follicle present at the time of luteolysis became the ovulatory follicle.