Investigating the Different Mechanisms of Genotoxic and Non-Genotoxic Carcinogens by a Gene Set Analysis

Based on the process of carcinogenesis, carcinogens are classified as either genotoxic or non-genotoxic. In contrast to non-genotoxic carcinogens, many genotoxic carcinogens have been reported to cause tumor in carcinogenic bioassays in animals. Thus evaluating the genotoxicity potential of chemicals is important to discriminate genotoxic from non-genotoxic carcinogens for health care and pharmaceutical industry safety. Additionally, investigating the difference between the mechanisms of genotoxic and non-genotoxic carcinogens could provide the foundation for a mechanism-based classification for unknown compounds. In this study, we investigated the gene expression of HepG2 cells treated with genotoxic or non-genotoxic carcinogens and compared their mechanisms of action. To enhance our understanding of the differences in the mechanisms of genotoxic and non-genotoxic carcinogens, we implemented a gene set analysis using 12 compounds for the training set (12, 24, 48 h) and validated significant gene sets using 22 compounds for the test set (24, 48 h). For a direct biological translation, we conducted a gene set analysis using Globaltest and selected significant gene sets. To validate the results, training and test compounds were predicted by the significant gene sets using a prediction analysis for microarrays (PAM). Finally, we obtained 6 gene sets, including sets enriched for genes involved in the adherens junction, bladder cancer, p53 signaling pathway, pathways in cancer, peroxisome and RNA degradation. Among the 6 gene sets, the bladder cancer and p53 signaling pathway sets were significant at 12, 24 and 48 h. We also found that the DDB2, RRM2B and GADD45A, genes related to the repair and damage prevention of DNA, were consistently up-regulated for genotoxic carcinogens. Our results suggest that a gene set analysis could provide a robust tool in the investigation of the different mechanisms of genotoxic and non-genotoxic carcinogens and construct a more detailed understanding of the perturbation of significant pathways.     

Prediction of non-genotoxic carcinogenesis in rats using changes in gene expression following acute dosing

Non-genotoxic carcinogenicity of chemicals is currently routinely evaluated in 2-year rodent bioassays. Therefore, the development of early biomarkers for non-genotoxic carcinogenesis would result in substantial savings in time and expense. The current study investigates whether early changes in gene expression may be developed as markers for cancer. Animals were treated for 1 or 5 days with either non-genotoxic carcinogens (NGTCs) or non-carcinogens and gene expression was analyzed by quantitative PCR (qPCR). We tested two gene signatures previously reported to detect non-genotoxic carcinogens. Using one gene signature it was confirmed that 3/3 non-genotoxic carcinogens and 2/2 non-carcinogens are correctly identified with data from 1 or 5 days of dosing. In contrast an alternative signature correctly identified 0/3 and 2/3 non-genotoxic carcinogens at 1 and 5 days of treatment, respectively and 2/2 non-carcinogens at both time-points. Additionally, we evaluated a novel panel of putative biomarker genes, from the literature, many of which have roles in cell growth and division, including myc, cdc2 and mcm6. These genes were significantly induced by non-genotoxic carcinogens and not by non-carcinogens. Using the average fold-induction across this panel, 2/3 non-genotoxic carcinogens were detected at both 1 and 5 days. These data support the idea that acute changes in gene expression may provide biomarkers for non-genotoxic carcinogenesis but also highlight interesting differences in the sensitivities of distinct gene signatures.     

Cross-Platform Toxicogenomics for the Prediction of Non-Genotoxic Hepatocarcinogenesis in Rat

In the area of omics profiling in toxicology, i.e. toxicogenomics, characteristic molecular profiles have previously been incorporated into prediction models for early assessment of a carcinogenic potential and mechanism-based classification of compounds. Traditionally, the biomarker signatures used for model construction were derived from individual high-throughput techniques, such as microarrays designed for monitoring global mRNA expression. In this study, we built predictive models by integrating omics data across complementary microarray platforms and introduced new concepts for modeling of pathway alterations and molecular interactions between multiple biological layers. We trained and evaluated diverse machine learning-based models, differing in the incorporated features and learning algorithms on a cross-omics dataset encompassing mRNA, miRNA, and protein expression profiles obtained from rat liver samples treated with a heterogeneous set of substances. Most of these compounds could be unambiguously classified as genotoxic carcinogens, non-genotoxic carcinogens, or non-hepatocarcinogens based on evidence from published studies. Since mixed characteristics were reported for the compounds Cyproterone acetate, Thioacetamide, and Wy-14643, we reclassified these compounds as either genotoxic or non-genotoxic carcinogens based on their molecular profiles. Evaluating our toxicogenomics models in a repeated external cross-validation procedure, we demonstrated that the prediction accuracy of our models could be increased by joining the biomarker signatures across multiple biological layers and by adding complex features derived from cross-platform integration of the omics data. Furthermore, we found that adding these features resulted in a better separation of the compound classes and a more confident reclassification of the three undefined compounds as non-genotoxic carcinogens.     

Prevalence of genotoxic chemicals among animal and human carcinogens evaluated in the IARC Monograph series.

To determine whether genotoxic and non-genotoxic carcinogens contribute similarly to the cancer burden in humans, an analysis was performed on agents that were evaluated in Supplements 6 and 7 to the IARC Monographs for their carcinogenic effects in humans and animals and for the activity in short-term genotoxicity tests. The prevalence of genotoxic carcinogens on four groups of agents, consisting of established human carcinogens (group 1, n = 30), probable human carcinogens (group 2A, n = 37), possible human carcinogens (group 2B, n = 113) and on agents with limited evidence of carcinogenicity in animals (a subset of group 3, n = 149) was determined. A high prevalence in the order of 80 to 90% of genotoxic carcinogens was found in each of the groups 1, 2A and 2B, which were also shown to be multi-species/multi-tissues carcinogens. The distribution of carcinogenic potency in rodents did not reveal any specific characteristic of the human carcinogens in group 1 that would differentiate them from agents in groups 2A, 2B and 3. The results of this analysis indicate that (a) an agent with unknown carcinogenic potential showing sufficient evidence of activity in in vitro/in vivo genotoxicity assays (involving as endpoints DNA damage and chromosomal/mutational damage) may represent a hazard to humans; and b) an agent showing lack of activity in this spectrum of genotoxicity assays should undergo evaluation for carcinogenicity by rodent bioassay, in view of the present lack of validated short-term tests for non-genotoxic carcinogens. Overall, this analysis implies that genotoxic carcinogens add more to the cancer burden in man than non-genotoxic carcinogens. Thus, identification of such genotoxic carcinogens and subsequent lowering of exposure will remain the main goal for primary cancer prevention in man.     

Preneoplastic lesions in rodent kidney induced spontaneously or by non-genotoxic agents: predictive nature and comparison to lesions induced by genotoxic carcinogens

The current literature on non-genotoxic renal carcinogens and the associated neoplastic and preneoplastic lesions has been reviewed in order to determine their occurrence and predictive nature with regard to tumor formation. In addition the mechanisms involved in the genesis of renal tumors are discussed. A more generalized classification of preneoplastic and neoplastic renal lesions was introduced, based on studies conducted with genotoxic and non-genotoxic renal carcinogens. Reports on preneoplastic lesions were found in the literature for control animals as well as animals treated with non-genotoxic carcinogens. Due to the paucity of data regarding preneoplastic lesions in control animals and animals treated with non-genotoxic carcinogens, new data were also generated by rereading kidney slides of control animals of a randomly selected NTP study and kidney slides of male rats treated with the highest dose of ochratoxin A, one of the most potent non-genotoxic renal carcinogens known. The control slides and the slides from the ochratoxin A study indicated that the cytologic and morphologic types of preneoplastic lesions characteristically observed in bioassays using genotoxic carcinogens are also present in control animals and animals treated with non-genotoxic carcinogens. The incidence of preneoplastic lesions was low in control animals and higher in animals treated with non-genotoxic carcinogens. The diverse classifications used in the literature did not allow a direct comparison of lesions and corresponding incidences with those of the newly generated data. However, three major tendencies were observed: (a) whenever a high incidence of preneoplastic lesions was reported, renal neoplasms were also found, (b) the larger the size and the further a lesion had progressed, the higher was the probability of tumor formation, and (c) not all preneoplastic lesions are irreversible, but reversibility seemed to decrease with increasing lesion size and progression. It must be emphasized that the data available for these conclusions are limited. This is not due to the lack of adequate numbers of bioassays with non-genotoxic carcinogens, but rather to the lack of consistent reporting of data. A generalized and more widely used classification which incorporates early lesions would certainly improve the current data base on renal lesions and provide future improvements in the predictive nature of these lesions.     

Comparison of the expression profiles induced by genotoxic and nongenotoxic carcinogens in rat liver

Application of recently developed gene expression techniques using microarrays in toxicological studies (toxicogenomics) facilitate the interpretation of a toxic compound's mode of action and may also allow the prediction of selected toxic effects based on gene expression changes. In order to test this hypothesis, we investigated whether carcinogens at doses known to induce liver tumors in the 2-year rat bioassay deregulate characteristic sets of genes in a short term in vivo study and whether these deregulated genes represent defined biological pathways. Male Wistar rats were dosed with the four nongenotoxic hepatocarcinogens methapyrilene (MPy, 60 mg/kg/day), diethylstilbestrol (DES, 10 mg/kg/day), Wy-14643 (Wy, 60 mg/kg/day), and piperonylbutoxide (PBO, 1200 mg/kg/day). After 1, 3, 7, and 14 days, the livers were taken for histopathological evaluation and for analysis of the gene expression profiles on Affymetrix RG_U34A arrays. The expression profile of the four nongenotoxic carcinogens were compared to the profiles of the four genotoxic carcinogens 2-nitrofluorene (2-NF), dimethylnitrosamine (DMN), 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK), and aflatoxin B1 (AB1) from a similar study reported previously. By using statistical and clustering tools characteristically deregulated genes were extracted and functionally classified. Distinct cellular pathways were affected by the nongenotoxic carcinogens compared to the genotoxic carcinogens which at least partly correlated with the two-stage model of carcinogenesis. Characteristic to genotoxic carcinogens were a DNA damage response and the activation of proliferative and survival signaling. Nongenotoxic carcinogens showed responses to oxidative DNA or protein damage, as well as cell cycle progression and signs of regeneration. Many of the gene alterations found with the nongenotoxic carcinogens imply compound-specific mechanisms. Although neither a single gene nor a single pathway will be sufficient to discriminate the two classes of carcinogens, it became evident that combinations of pathway-associated gene expression profiles may be used to predict a genotoxic or nongenotoxic carcinogenic potential of a compound in short-term studies.     

Arsenic Inhibits DNA Mismatch Repair by Promoting EGFR Expression and PCNA Phosphorylation

Both genotoxic and non-genotoxic chemicals can act as carcinogens. However, while genotoxic compounds lead directly to mutations that promote unregulated cell growth, the mechanism by which non-genotoxic carcinogens lead to cellular transformation is poorly understood. Using a model non-genotoxic carcinogen, arsenic, we show here that exposure to arsenic inhibits mismatch repair (MMR) in human cells, possibly through its ability to stimulate epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-dependent tyrosine phosphorylation of proliferating cellular nuclear antigen (PCNA). HeLa cells exposed to exogenous arsenic demonstrate a dose- and time-dependent increase in the levels of EGFR and tyrosine 211-phosphorylated PCNA. Cell extracts derived from arsenic-treated HeLa cells are defective in MMR, and unphosphorylated recombinant PCNA restores normal MMR activity to these extracts. These results suggest a model in which arsenic induces expression of EGFR, which in turn phosphorylates PCNA, and phosphorylated PCNA then inhibits MMR, leading to increased susceptibility to carcinogenesis. This study suggests a putative novel mechanism of action for arsenic and other non-genotoxic carcinogens.     

Structural basis of carcinogenicity in rodents of genotoxicants and non-genotoxicants

A set of 189 chemicals tested in the National Toxicology Program Cancer Bioassay was subjected to analysis by CASE, the Computer-Automated Structure Evaluation system. In the data set, 63% of the chemicals were carcinogens, approx. 40% of the carcinogens were non-genotoxic, i.e., they possessed neither "structural alerts" for DNA reactivity as defined by Ashby and Tennant, 1988, nor were they mutagenic for Salmonella. The data base can be characterized as a "combined rodent" compilation as chemicals were characterized as "carcinogenic" if they were carcinogenic in either rats or mice or both. CASE identified 23 fragments which accounted for the carcinogenicity, or lack thereof, of most of the chemicals. The sensitivity and specificity were unexpectedly high: 1.00 and 0.86, respectively. Based upon the identified biophores and biophobes, CASE performed exceedingly well in predicting the activity of chemicals not included among the 189 in the original set. CASE predicted correctly the carcinogenicity of non-genotoxic carcinogens thereby suggesting a structural commonality in the action of this group of carcinogens. As a matter of fact biophores restricted to non-genotoxic carcinogens were identified as were "non-electrophilic" biophores shared by genotoxic and non-genotoxic carcinogens. The findings suggest that the CASE program may help in the elucidation of the basis of the action of non-genotoxic carcinogens.     

Application of in vitro cell transformation assays in regulatory toxicology for pharmaceuticals, chemicals, food products and cosmetics

Two year rodent bioassays play a key role in the assessment of carcinogenic potential of chemicals to humans. The seventh amendment to the European Cosmetics Directive will ban in 2013 the marketing of cosmetic and personal care products that contain ingredients that have been tested in animal models. Thus 2-year rodent bioassays will not be available for cosmetics/personal care products. Furthermore, for large testing programs like REACH, in vivo carcinogenicity testing is impractical. Alternative ways to carcinogenicity assessment are urgently required. In terms of standardization and validation, the most advanced in vitro tests for carcinogenicity are the cell transformation assays (CTAs). Although CTAs do not mimic the whole carcinogenesis process in vivo, they represent a valuable support in identifying transforming potential of chemicals. CTAs have been shown to detect genotoxic as well as non-genotoxic carcinogens and are helpful in the determination of thresholds for genotoxic and non-genotoxic carcinogens. The extensive review on CTAs by the OECD (OECD (2007) Environmental Health and Safety Publications, Series on Testing and Assessment, No. 31) and the proven within- and between-laboratories reproducibility of the SHE CTAs justifies broader use of these methods to assess carcinogenic potential of chemicals.     

In vivo Comet assay on isolated kidney cells to distinguish genotoxic carcinogens from epigenetic carcinogens or cytotoxic compounds

The objective of this study was to determine the ability of the alkaline in vivo Comet assay (pH>13) to distinguish genotoxic carcinogens from epigenetic carcinogens when performed on freshly isolated kidney cells and to determine the possible interference of cytotoxicity by assessing DNA damage induced by renal genotoxic, epigenetic or toxic compounds after enzymatic isolation of kidney cells from OFA Sprague-Dawley male rats. The ability of the Comet assay to distinguish (1) genotoxicity versus cytotoxicity and (2) genotoxic versus non-genotoxic (epigenetic) carcinogens, was thus investigated by studying five known genotoxic renal carcinogens acting through diverse mechanisms of action, i.e. streptozotocin, aristolochic acids, 2-nitroanisole, potassium bromate and cisplatin, two rodent renal epigenetic carcinogens: d-limonene and ciclosporine and two nephrotoxic compounds: streptomycin and indomethacin. Animals were treated once with the test compound by the appropriate route of administration and genotoxic effects were measured at the two sampling times of 3-6 and 22-26h after treatment. Regarding the tissue processing, the limited background level of DNA migration observed in the negative control groups throughout all experiments demonstrated that the enzymatic isolation method implemented in the current study is appropriate. On the other hand, streptozotocin, 20mg/kg, used as positive reference control concurrently to each assay, caused a clear increase in the mean Olive Tail Moment median value, which allows validating the current methodology. Under these experimental conditions, the in vivo rodent Comet assay demonstrated good sensitivity and good specificity: all the five renal genotoxic carcinogens were clearly detected in at least one expression period either directly or indirectly, as in the case of cisplatin: for this cross-linking agent, the significant decrease in DNA migration observed under standard electrophoresis conditions was clearly amplified when the duration of electrophoresis was increased up to 40min. In contrast, epigenetic and nephrotoxic compounds failed to induce any signifcant increase in DNA migration. In conclusion, the in vivo rodent Comet assay performed on isolated kidney cells could be used as a tool to investigate the genotoxic potential of a test compound if neoplasic/preneoplasic changes occur after subchronic or chronic treatments, in order to determine the role of genotoxicity in tumor induction. Moreover, the epigenetic carcinogens and cytotoxic compounds displayed clearly negative responses in this study. These results allow excluding a DNA direct-acting mechanism of action and can thus suggest that a threshold exists. Therefore, the current in vivo rodent Comet assay could contribute to elucidate an epigenetic mechanism and thus, to undertake a risk assessment associated with human use, depending on the exposure level.     

Determination of the genotoxic status of a chemical

Before a non-genotoxic mechanism of action is proposed for a rodent carcinogen, or predicted for an untested chemical, adequate knowledge of the genotoxic status of the chemical must exist. The current absence of absolute agreement on the set of assays to use when evaluating genotoxicity suggests that a practical approach should be adopted, as outlined, for example, by Arni et al. (1988). In that approach, the chemical is evaluated for gene mutagenicity to Salmonella, for its ability to induce chromosomal aberrations in cultured mammalian cells, and if appropriate, gene mutations in cultured mammalian cells. Consideration of the chemical structure and the expected metabolism of the test chemical also contribute to the classification of an agent as a putative non-genotoxin. Judgement is required when interpreting isolated positive test responses generated in peripheral short-term tests. When attempting to study the mode of action of an established rodent carcinogen that is thought to operate by a non-genotoxic mechanism of action, genotoxicity data generated in vivo, if possible in the target tissue, are of great value. Compounds defined as non-genotoxic by these methods then become candidates for the study of those non-genotoxic toxicities that may predict or explain non-genotoxic rodent carcinogenesis.     

Early indicators of potential neoplasia produced in the rat forestomach by non-genotoxic agents: the importance of induced cellular proliferation

Forestomach neoplasia induced by the apparently non-genotoxic carcinogens, butylated hydroxyanisole and propionic acid, appears to arise by way of sustained high levels of cellular proliferation. Several other inducers of enhanced cellular proliferation, or the consequential incidence of hyperplastic lesions, have been identified in the rodent forestomach but the requisite carcinogenicity bioassays remain undone. In other tissues, such as the male rat kidney, the rodent thyroid follicular cell and the bladder epithelium, there is also evidence supporting the concept that sustained enhanced cellular proliferation may be an important early marker for non-genotoxic carcinogens. This reaction is, however, not likely to be the only marker necessary for the identification of non-genotoxic carcinogens.     

Genomic Models of Short-Term Exposure Accurately Predict Long-Term Chemical Carcinogenicity and Identify Putative Mechanisms of Action

Background

Despite an overall decrease in incidence of and mortality from cancer, about 40% of Americans will be diagnosed with the disease in their lifetime, and around 20% will die of it. Current approaches to test carcinogenic chemicals adopt the 2-year rodent bioassay, which is costly and time-consuming. As a result, fewer than 2% of the chemicals on the market have actually been tested. However, evidence accumulated to date suggests that gene expression profiles from model organisms exposed to chemical compounds reflect underlying mechanisms of action, and that these toxicogenomic models could be used in the prediction of chemical carcinogenicity.

Results

In this study, we used a rat-based microarray dataset from the NTP DrugMatrix Database to test the ability of toxicogenomics to model carcinogenicity. We analyzed 1,221 gene-expression profiles obtained from rats treated with 127 well-characterized compounds, including genotoxic and non-genotoxic carcinogens. We built a classifier that predicts a chemical''s carcinogenic potential with an AUC of 0.78, and validated it on an independent dataset from the Japanese Toxicogenomics Project consisting of 2,065 profiles from 72 compounds. Finally, we identified differentially expressed genes associated with chemical carcinogenesis, and developed novel data-driven approaches for the molecular characterization of the response to chemical stressors.

Conclusion

Here, we validate a toxicogenomic approach to predict carcinogenicity and provide strong evidence that, with a larger set of compounds, we should be able to improve the sensitivity and specificity of the predictions. We found that the prediction of carcinogenicity is tissue-dependent and that the results also confirm and expand upon previous studies implicating DNA damage, the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor, the aryl hydrocarbon receptor, and regenerative pathology in the response to carcinogen exposure.     

Rodent tumor profiles, Salmonella mutagenicity and risk assessment

The tumorigenesis profiles of 116 chemicals, which proved to induce cancer in the NCI/NTP experimentation, were studied by multivariate data analysis methods. Three main patterns of tumor induction were evident. One chemical (benzene) was not classifiable in any of the 3 clusters of chemicals. The carcinogen classes based on patterns of tumor induction did not reflect a repartition between Ames-positive and Ames-negative chemicals. Therefore any classification of carcinogens as either 'primary' (genotoxic, hence assumed to pose a greater risk) or 'secondary' (presumably carcinogenic via non-genotoxic mechanisms) would seem to be a subject for research and speculation, and, for the present, an unsuitable basis for risk assessment.     

In vivo Comet assay on isolated kidney cells to distinguish genotoxic carcinogens from epigenetic carcinogens or cytotoxic compounds

The objective of this study was to determine the ability of the alkaline in vivo Comet assay (pH > 13) to distinguish genotoxic carcinogens from epigenetic carcinogens when performed on freshly isolated kidney cells and to determine the possible interference of cytotoxicity by assessing DNA damage induced by renal genotoxic, epigenetic or toxic compounds after enzymatic isolation of kidney cells from OFA Sprague–Dawley male rats. The ability of the Comet assay to distinguish (1) genotoxicity versus cytotoxicity and (2) genotoxic versus non-genotoxic (epigenetic) carcinogens, was thus investigated by studying five known genotoxic renal carcinogens acting through diverse mechanisms of action, i.e. streptozotocin, aristolochic acids, 2-nitroanisole, potassium bromate and cisplatin, two rodent renal epigenetic carcinogens: d-limonene and ciclosporine and two nephrotoxic compounds: streptomycin and indomethacin. Animals were treated once with the test compound by the appropriate route of administration and genotoxic effects were measured at the two sampling times of 3–6 and 22–26 h after treatment. Regarding the tissue processing, the limited background level of DNA migration observed in the negative control groups throughout all experiments demonstrated that the enzymatic isolation method implemented in the current study is appropriate. On the other hand, streptozotocin, 20 mg/kg, used as positive reference control concurrently to each assay, caused a clear increase in the mean Olive Tail Moment median value, which allows validating the current methodology.Under these experimental conditions, the in vivo rodent Comet assay demonstrated good sensitivity and good specificity: all the five renal genotoxic carcinogens were clearly detected in at least one expression period either directly or indirectly, as in the case of cisplatin: for this cross-linking agent, the significant decrease in DNA migration observed under standard electrophoresis conditions was clearly amplified when the duration of electrophoresis was increased up to 40 min. In contrast, epigenetic and nephrotoxic compounds failed to induce any signifcant increase in DNA migration. In conclusion, the in vivo rodent Comet assay performed on isolated kidney cells could be used as a tool to investigate the genotoxic potential of a test compound if neoplasic/preneoplasic changes occur after subchronic or chronic treatments, in order to determine the role of genotoxicity in tumor induction. Moreover, the epigenetic carcinogens and cytotoxic compounds displayed clearly negative responses in this study. These results allow excluding a DNA direct-acting mechanism of action and can thus suggest that a threshold exists. Therefore, the current in vivo rodent Comet assay could contribute to elucidate an epigenetic mechanism and thus, to undertake a risk assessment associated with human use, depending on the exposure level.     

Discrimination of genotoxic and non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogens by statistical analysis based on gene expression profiling in the mouse liver as determined by quantitative real-time PCR

The general aim of the present study is to discriminate between mouse genotoxic and non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogens via selected gene expression patterns in the liver as analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) and statistical analysis. qPCR was conducted on liver samples from groups of 5 male, 9-week-old B6C3F(1) mice, at 4 and 48h following a single intraperitoneal administration of chemicals. We quantified 35 genes selected from our previous DNA microarray studies using 12 different chemicals: 8 genotoxic hepatocarcinogens (2-acetylaminofluorene, 2,4-diaminotoluene, diisopropanolnitrosamine, 4-dimethylaminoazobenzene, 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone, N-nitrosomorpholine, quinoline and urethane) and 4 non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogens (1,4-dichlorobenzene, dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane, di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate and furan). A considerable number of genes exhibited significant changes in their gene expression ratios (experimental group/control group) analyzed statistically by the Dunnett's test and Welch's t-test. Finally, we distinguished between the genotoxic and non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogens by statistical analysis using principal component analysis (PCA) of the gene expression profiles for 7 genes (Btg2, Ccnf, Ccng1, Lpr1, Mbd1, Phlda3 and Tubb2c) at 4h and for 12 genes (Aen, Bax, Btg2, Ccnf, Ccng1, Cdkn1a, Gdf15, Lrp1, Mbd1, Phlda3, Plk2 and Tubb2c) at 48h. Seven major biological processes were extracted from the gene ontology analysis: apoptosis, the cell cycle, cell proliferation, DNA damage, DNA repair, oncogenes and tumor suppression. The major, biologically relevant gene pathway suggested was the DNA damage response pathway, resulting from signal transduction by a p53-class mediator leading to the induction of apoptosis. Eight genes (Aen, Bax, Btg2, Ccng1, Cdkn1a, Gdf15, Phlda3 and Plk2) that are directly associated with Trp53 contributed to the PCA. The current findings demonstrate a successful discrimination between genotoxic and non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogens, using qPCR and PCA, on 12 genes associated with a Trp53-mediated signaling pathway for DNA damage response at 4 and 48 h after a single administration of chemicals.     

The superiority of hamster liver microsomal fraction for activating nitrosamines to mutagens in Salmonella typhimurium

46 chemicals of various classes and structures, including 30 known animal carcinogens, were evaluated for genotoxic effects using the Escherichia coli rec assay with strains WP2 (wild-type) and WP100 (uvrA- recA-) in qualitative and quantitative spot tests and in quantitative suspension tests. The rec assay detected 17 of 30 known carcinogens as genotoxic agents, including mitomycin C and diethylnitrosamine, both negative in the Salmonella/Ames test as utilized in these studies. The rec assay in conjunction with the Salmonella/Ames test detected 20 of 30 known carcinogens as genotoxic agents. Azo/aminoazo carcinogens showed little gentoxicity, and the aromatic amine 2-acetylaminofluorene was non-genotoxic in the rec assay. The rec assay was more effective than pol tests with E. coli strains W3110/p3478 and strains WP2/WP67. Effectiveness of the rec assay was related to the DNA repair-defective nature of the uvrA- recA- genotype of strain WP100.     

The alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis assay with mouse multiple organs: results with 30 aromatic amines evaluated by the IARC and U.S. NTP

The genotoxicity of 30 aromatic amines selected from IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) groups 1, 2A, 2B and 3 and from the U.S. NTP (National Toxicology Program) carcinogenicity database were evaluated using the alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis (SCG) (Comet) assay in mouse organs. We treated groups of four mice once orally at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and sampled stomach, colon, liver, kidney, bladder, lung, brain, and bone marrow 3, 8 and 24 h after treatment. For the 20 aromatic amines that are rodent carcinogens, the assay was positive in at least one organ, suggesting a high predictive ability for the assay. For most of the SCG-positive aromatic amines, the organs exhibiting increased levels of DNA damage were not necessarily the target organs for carcinogenicity. It was rare, in contrast, for the target organs not to show DNA damage. Organ-specific genotoxicity, therefore, is necessary but not sufficient for the prediction of organ-specific carcinogenicity. For the 10 non-carcinogenic aromatic amines (eight were Ames test-positive and two were Ames test-negative), the assay was negative in all organs studied. In the safety evaluation of chemicals, it is important to demonstrate that Ames test-positive agents are not genotoxic in vivo. Chemical carcinogens can be classified as genotoxic (Ames test-positive) and putative non-genotoxic (Ames test-negative) carcinogens. The alkaline SCG assay, which detects DNA lesions, is not suitable for identifying non-genotoxic carcinogens. The present SCG study revealed a high positive response ratio for rodent genotoxic carcinogens and a high negative response ratio for rodent genotoxic non-carcinogens. These results suggest that the alkaline SCG assay can be usefully used to evaluate the in vivo genotoxicity of chemicals in multiple organs, providing for a good assessment of potential carcinogenicity.