不同DNA提取法对腺病毒和细小病毒PCR检测效果评估

分别利用硫氰酸胍(Guanidine thiocyanate,GuScN)抽提法、螯合树脂处理法和蛋白酶K-酚/氯仿抽提法从粪便样品中制备腺病毒DNA(dsDNA)或细小病毒DNA(ssDNA)然后进行PCR检测。结果显示硫氰酸胍抽提法、螯合树脂处理法能有效地去除粪便中影响PCR扩增的抑制物,提高PCR检测的敏感性,而传统蛋白酶K-酚/氯仿抽提法不能有效地去除PCR扩增的抑制物,影响PCR检测结果。在检测粪便中腺病毒时,硫氰酸胍、螯合树脂和蛋白酶-酚/氯仿抽提法分别允许检测5TCID_{50相似文献}   

A DNA extraction method for RAPD analysis from plants rich in soluble polysaccharides

A simple procedure for the isolation of DNA from mature leaf tissue was developed. This procedure purified DNA using Sephacryl S-1000 column and PEG 8000 precipitation. Polysaccharide-like components were successfully removed from DNA samples from species in which polysaccharides were found to be difficult to remove by phenol/chloroform extraction. The DNA obtained by this method was suitable for PCR, RAPD, enzyme digestion, and Southern-blot analyses.     

Evaluation of six methods for extraction and purification of viral DNA from urine and serum samples

The sensitivity and reliability of PCR for diagnostic and research purposes require efficient unbiased procedures of extraction and purification of nucleic acids. One of the major limitations of PCR-based tests is the inhibition of the amplification process by substances present in clinical samples. This study used specimens spiked with a known amount of plasmid pBKV (ATCC 33-1) to compare six methods for extraction and purification of viral DNA from urine and serum samples based on recovery efficiency in terms of yield of DNA and percentage of plasmid pBKV recovered, purity of extracted DNA, and percentage of inhibition. The most effective extraction methods were the phenol/chloroform technique and the silica gel extraction procedure for urine and serum samples, respectively. Considering DNA purity, the silica gel extraction procedure and the phenol/chloroform method produced the most satisfactory results in urine and serum samples, respectively. The presence of inhibitors was overcome by all DNA extraction techniques in urine samples, as evidenced by semiquantitative PCR amplification. In serum samples, the lysis method and the proteinase K procedure did not completely overcome the presence of inhibitors.     

Giardia intestinalis: DNA extraction approaches to improve PCR results

Difficulty in disrupting cysts of Giardia intestinalis, a cosmopolitan protozoan parasite, decreases the yield of DNA extracted and reduces the effectiveness of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). To improve the detection of the Giardia Glutamate Dehydrogenase (gdh) gene, we re-evaluated the effects of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) extraction methods. Purified and concentrated cysts from 33 fecal samples were disrupted using conventional methods, and DNA extraction was conducted using two protocols: the QIAamp Stool Mini Kit and phenol/chloroform/isoamyl alcohol (PCI). PCR amplification was successful for 12 extracted DNA samples (36%) using PCI following a glass bead and freeze/thaw pretreatment and for all 33 samples (100%) using the QIAamp Stool Mini Kit following the aforementioned pretreatment. Consequently, the pretreatment of cysts with glass beads and freeze/thaw cycles followed by extraction of DNA with the QIAamp Stool Mini kit was the more effective protocol.     

一种基于PCR分析多样性的小鼠肠道微生物宏基因组提取方法

目的建立一种基于PCR分析分子多样性的小鼠肠道菌群宏基因组提取方法。方法比较、综合国内外小鼠肠道菌群宏基因组的提取方法后建立一种新方法,小鼠肠道内容物经丙酮洗涤,差速离心,溶菌酶、SDS裂解,CTAB处理,酚／氯仿抽提后可得到高质量的DNA,通过紫外分光光度计、琼脂糖凝胶电泳、细菌通用引物PCR和扩增核糖体限制性酶切片段分析（ARDRA）等检测该方法的实用性。结果该方法获得的小鼠肠道菌群宏基因组DNA大小在23kb左右,A260／A280在1．8—2．0,经细菌通用引物PCR后能得到适用于ARDRA的目的产物。结论该方法经济适用性较强,具备一定的应用价值。     

A comparison of methods for extracting DNA from Coxiella burnetii as measured by a duplex qPCR assay

Aims: To determine the optimal DNA extraction method for the detection of Coxiella burnetii including the small‐cell variant (SCV) by real‐time PCR (qPCR) in clinical samples. Methods and Results: A duplex qPCR detecting two Coxiella burnetii gene targets (com1 and IS1111a genes) was developed. Each target in this PCR had a sensitivity of one copy number per reaction. DNA extraction methods were compared on spiked negative samples and included a silica column kit, a chloroform separation prior to a silica column method and a chloroform/phenol separation and DNA precipitation method. Conclusions: The silica column extraction method was more efficient at recovering C. burnetii DNA, from large‐cell and small‐cell variants, than a chloroform or chloroform/phenol method. The silica column method was useful on spiked human samples including serum, buffy coat and bone marrow samples. Significance and impact of study: This study demonstrated that a simple column kit method is efficient to use for the detection of C. burnetii in clinical samples including the SCV.     

A comparison of DNA extraction and purification methods to detect Escherichia coli O157:H7 in cattle manure

The extraction of DNA from manure and the subsequent polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of virulence genes to detect pathogens require an effective method of purification. Four different methods were assessed for their effectiveness in extracting and purifying Escherichia coli O157:H7 DNA from cattle manure: phenol/chloroform purification, phenol/chloroform/Sepharose B4 spin columns, phenol/chloroform/polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (PVPP) spun columns, and Mo Bio UltraClean kit. A PCR assay targeting the shiga-like toxin I gene (sltI) was carried out to determine the effectiveness of the four methods in removing PCR inhibitors from the manure samples. All methods were used to extract a manure slurry and the cleanliness of the samples was tested by the PCR with varying concentrations of spiked E. coli O157:H7 target DNA. The PVPP spun columns and the UltraClean kit had the best detection limit, detecting 20 pg of E. coli DNA (about 2x10(3) cells) per 100 mg of manure. The UltraClean kit and the PVPP spun columns also had the best and similar detection limits of 3x10(4) CFU/100 mg manure when E. coli O157:H7 cells were spiked into the manure sample and purified by all four methods. The enrichment of cells after inoculation into manure was performed using tryptic soy broth at 37 degrees C for 5 h. Both the PVPP spun columns and the UltraClean kit methods were used to purify the enriched samples and were able to detect initial inocula of 6 CFU/100 mg manure, indicating that the two methods were highly efficient in purifying DNA from manure samples.     

Detection of aromatic catabolic gene expression in heterogeneous organic matter used for reduction of volatile organic compounds (VOC) by biofiltration

A qualitative procedure of purified DNA/RNA co-extraction from complex organic matter, used as biofilter support for removing volatile organic compounds, was set up and applied to detect xylene monooxygenase gene expression by RT-PCR. A DNA/RNA extraction protocol based on a combination of sample lyophilization pre-treatment and CTAB––phenol/chloroform extraction procedure was optimized for the recovery of purified nucleic acids [100–500 ng DNA (10 kb) and 0.5–2 μg of rRNA 16S from 100 mg matrix]. PCR and RT-PCR protocols were established to detect xylene monooxygenase gene expression starting from differentially induced organic matrices obtained by biofiltration technology. This work allowed the microbial degradation activities in heterogeneous organic solid media to be studied and suggests a rapid method to follow specific biological activities during solid and/or semisolid organic substrates biotransformation.     

Improved high-throughput sunflower and cotton genomic DNA extraction and PCR fidelity

The extraction of high-quality genomic DNA for PCR amplification from sunflower (Helianthus annuus) and cotton (Gossypium spp.) is challenging because of the presence of polysaccharides, secondary metabolites, and polyphenolics in the tissues. A high-throughput DNA extraction protocol was needed in our laboratory for simple sequence repeats (SSR)-marker screening and other molecular analyses that do not require organic extraction steps of phenol or chloroform. Here we describe 2 improved highthroughput protocols for DNA extraction and in-PCR modification that result in successful PCR amplification of sunflower and cotton. While the sunflower DNA extraction protocol uses reducing agents such as sodium metabisulfite and dithiothreitol (DTT), the cotton protocol uses polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) in PCR reactions and reducing agents in the DNA extraction procedure.     

Modified CTAB Procedure for DNA Isolation from Epiphytic Cacti of the Genera Hylocereus and Selenicereus (Cactaceae)

We present a simple protocol for DNA isolation from climbing cacti, genera Hylocereus and Selenicereus. The abundant polysaccharides present in Hylocereus and Selenicereus species interfere with DNA isolation, and DNA extracts, rich in polysaccharides, are poor templates for amplification using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). We used roots as the source tissue due to the lower viscosity of the extracts relative to that of other tissues. The extraction and isolation procedure we devised consists of the following steps: (1) three washes of ground tissue with the extraction buffer to remove the polysaccharides; (2) extraction with high-salt (4 M NaCl) cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) buffer to remove the remaining polysaccharides; (3) removal of RNA by RNase; (4) phenol:chloroform extraction to remove proteins; (5) chloroform extraction to remove remaining phenols. The yields ranged from 10 to 20 g DNA/g fresh roots. DNA samples prepared by our method were consistently amplifiable in the RAPD reaction and gave reproducible profiles.     

Evaluation of Cryptosporidium parvum genotyping techniques.

We evaluated the specificity and sensitivity of 11 previously described species differentiation and genotyping PCR protocols for detection of Cryptosporidium parasites. Genomic DNA from three species of Cryptosporidium parasites (genotype 1 and genotype 2 of C. parvum, C. muris, and C. serpentis), two Eimeria species (E. neischulzi and E. papillata), and Giardia duodenalis were used to evaluate the specificity of primers. Furthermore, the sensitivity of the genotyping primers was tested by using genomic DNA isolated from known numbers of oocysts obtained from a genotype 2 C. parvum isolate. PCR amplification was repeated at least three times with all of the primer pairs. Of the 11 protocols studied, 10 amplified C. parvum genotypes 1 and 2, and the expected fragment sizes were obtained. Our results indicate that two species-differentiating protocols are not Cryptosporidium specific, as the primers used in these protocols also amplified the DNA of Eimeria species. The sensitivity studies revealed that two nested PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) protocols based on the small-subunit rRNA and dihydrofolate reductase genes are more sensitive than single-round PCR or PCR-RFLP protocols.     

Isolation of polysaccharide-free DNA from plants

A quick procedure for the isolation of polysaccharide-free DNA from different plant species and cell suspension or callus cultures is described. The originality of the method lies in the use of a mixture of glycoside hydrolases that leads, after phenol and chloroform extraction, to the isolation of pure DNA without any polysaccharide contamination. The highly purified DNA can be used for nucleotide analysis by HPLC, RFLP analysis and PCR amplification.     

Species‐level biodiversity assessment using marine environmental DNA metabarcoding requires protocol optimization and standardization

DNA extraction from environmental samples (environmental DNA; eDNA) for metabarcoding‐based biodiversity studies is gaining popularity as a noninvasive, time‐efficient, and cost‐effective monitoring tool. The potential benefits are promising for marine conservation, as the marine biome is frequently under‐surveyed due to its inaccessibility and the consequent high costs involved. With increasing numbers of eDNA‐related publications have come a wide array of capture and extraction methods. Without visual species confirmation, inconsistent use of laboratory protocols hinders comparability between studies because the efficiency of target DNA isolation may vary. We determined an optimal protocol (capture and extraction) for marine eDNA research based on total DNA yield measurements by comparing commonly employed methods of seawater filtering and DNA isolation. We compared metabarcoding results of both targeted (small taxonomic group with species‐level assignment) and universal (broad taxonomic group with genus/family‐level assignment) approaches obtained from replicates treated with the optimal and a low‐performance capture and extraction protocol to determine the impact of protocol choice and DNA yield on biodiversity detection. Filtration through cellulose‐nitrate membranes and extraction with Qiagen's DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit outperformed other combinations of capture and extraction methods, showing a ninefold improvement in DNA yield over the poorest performing methods. Use of optimized protocols resulted in a significant increase in OTU and species richness for targeted metabarcoding assays. However, changing protocols made little difference to the OTU and taxon richness obtained using universal metabarcoding assays. Our results demonstrate an increased risk of false‐negative species detection for targeted eDNA approaches when protocols with poor DNA isolation efficacy are employed. Appropriate optimization is therefore essential for eDNA monitoring to remain a powerful, efficient, and relatively cheap method for biodiversity assessments. For seawater, we advocate filtration through cellulose‐nitrate membranes and extraction with Qiagen's DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit or phenol‐chloroform‐isoamyl for successful implementation of eDNA multi‐marker metabarcoding surveys.     

Evaluating genomic DNA extraction methods from human whole blood using endpoint and real-time PCR assays

The extraction of genomic DNA is the crucial first step in large-scale epidemiological studies. Though there are many popular DNA isolation methods from human whole blood, only a few reports have compared their efficiencies using both end-point and real-time PCR assays. Genomic DNA was extracted from coronary artery disease patients using solution-based conventional protocols such as the phenol–chloroform/proteinase-K method and a non-phenolic non-enzymatic Rapid-Method, which were evaluated and compared vis-a-vis a commercially available silica column-based Blood DNA isolation kit. The appropriate method for efficiently extracting relatively pure DNA was assessed based on the total DNA yield, concentration, purity ratios (A₂₆₀/A₂₈₀ and A₂₆₀/A₂₃₀), spectral profile and agarose gel electrophoresis analysis. The quality of the isolated DNA was further analysed for PCR inhibition using a murine specific ATP1A3 qPCR assay and mtDNA/Y-chromosome ratio determination assay. The suitability of the extracted DNA for downstream applications such as end-point SNP genotyping, was tested using PCR-RFLP analysis of the AGTR1-1166A>C variant, a mirSNP having pharmacogenetic relevance in cardiovascular diseases. Compared to the traditional phenol–chloroform/proteinase-K method, our results indicated the Rapid-Method to be a more suitable protocol for genomic DNA extraction from human whole blood in terms of DNA quantity, quality, safety, processing time and cost. The Rapid-Method, which is based on a simple salting-out procedure, is not only safe and cost-effective, but also has the added advantage of being scaled up to process variable sample volumes, thus enabling it to be applied in large-scale epidemiological studies.     

Purification of human genomic DNA from whole blood using sodium perchlorate in place of phenol

We have developed a new, rapid method for the extraction of human genomic DNA from whole blood samples. Traditionally, genomic DNA has been extracted from blood by overnight proteinase K digestion of lysed peripheral lymphocytes followed by phenol/chloroform extraction. In addition to being time consuming, the use of phenol involves inherent risks due to the toxic nature of the reagent. Our method for the extraction of DNA from whole blood uses sodium perchlorate and chloroform instead of phenol with a significant time savings realized as well as fewer hazards to the technician. Furthermore, DNA prepared by this new method is an excellent substrate for restriction endonuclease digestion and Southern hybridization analysis.     

Evaluation and Optimization of DNA Extraction and Purification Procedures for Soil and Sediment Samples

We compared and statistically evaluated the effectiveness of nine DNA extraction procedures by using frozen and dried samples of two silt loam soils and a silt loam wetland sediment with different organic matter contents. The effects of different chemical extractants (sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS], chloroform, phenol, Chelex 100, and guanadinium isothiocyanate), different physical disruption methods (bead mill homogenization and freeze-thaw lysis), and lysozyme digestion were evaluated based on the yield and molecular size of the recovered DNA. Pairwise comparisons of the nine extraction procedures revealed that bead mill homogenization with SDS combined with either chloroform or phenol optimized both the amount of DNA extracted and the molecular size of the DNA (maximum size, 16 to 20 kb). Neither lysozyme digestion before SDS treatment nor guanidine isothiocyanate treatment nor addition of Chelex 100 resin improved the DNA yields. Bead mill homogenization in a lysis mixture containing chloroform, SDS, NaCl, and phosphate-Tris buffer (pH 8) was found to be the best physical lysis technique when DNA yield and cell lysis efficiency were used as criteria. The bead mill homogenization conditions were also optimized for speed and duration with two different homogenizers. Recovery of high-molecular-weight DNA was greatest when we used lower speeds and shorter times (30 to 120 s). We evaluated four different DNA purification methods (silica-based DNA binding, agarose gel electrophoresis, ammonium acetate precipitation, and Sephadex G-200 gel filtration) for DNA recovery and removal of PCR inhibitors from crude extracts. Sephadex G-200 spin column purification was found to be the best method for removing PCR-inhibiting substances while minimizing DNA loss during purification. Our results indicate that for these types of samples, optimum DNA recovery requires brief, low-speed bead mill homogenization in the presence of a phosphate-buffered SDS-chloroform mixture, followed by Sephadex G-200 column purification.     

Evaluation and optimization of DNA extraction and purification procedures for soil and sediment samples.

We compared and statistically evaluated the effectiveness of nine DNA extraction procedures by using frozen and dried samples of two silt loam soils and a silt loam wetland sediment with different organic matter contents. The effects of different chemical extractants (sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS], chloroform, phenol, Chelex 100, and guanadinium isothiocyanate), different physical disruption methods (bead mill homogenization and freeze-thaw lysis), and lysozyme digestion were evaluated based on the yield and molecular size of the recovered DNA. Pairwise comparisons of the nine extraction procedures revealed that bead mill homogenization with SDS combined with either chloroform or phenol optimized both the amount of DNA extracted and the molecular size of the DNA (maximum size, 16 to 20 kb). Neither lysozyme digestion before SDS treatment nor guanidine isothiocyanate treatment nor addition of Chelex 100 resin improved the DNA yields. Bead mill homogenization in a lysis mixture containing chloroform, SDS, NaCl, and phosphate-Tris buffer (pH 8) was found to be the best physical lysis technique when DNA yield and cell lysis efficiency were used as criteria. The bead mill homogenization conditions were also optimized for speed and duration with two different homogenizers. Recovery of high-molecular-weight DNA was greatest when we used lower speeds and shorter times (30 to 120 s). We evaluated four different DNA purification methods (silica-based DNA binding, agarose gel electrophoresis, ammonium acetate precipitation, and Sephadex G-200 gel filtration) for DNA recovery and removal of PCR inhibitors from crude extracts. Sephadex G-200 spin column purification was found to be the best method for removing PCR-inhibiting substances while minimizing DNA loss during purification. Our results indicate that for these types of samples, optimum DNA recovery requires brief, low-speed bead mill homogenization in the presence of a phosphate-buffered SDS-chloroform mixture, followed by Sephadex G-200 column purification.     

New protocol for DNA extraction of stool

Present methods for DNA isolation of stool have various limitations such as the amount of stool used, the requirement of lavage fluids or the use of fresh stool. In this paper, a new method is described for the isolation of human nucleic acids from stool, which is independent from the moment of collection. Fecal samples as dry as possible were collected from 75 patients; two grams of stool were mixed with a lysis buffer containing phenol. DNA yields of crude stool were variable and ranged from 9-1686 micrograms/g of feces. With dot blots in 9 of the 75 cases, the human DNA was identified and ranged from 0.06%-46%. In the remaining 66 cases, human genomic DNA was detected by nested PCR, using human K-ras gene amplification as an example. Amplification products were confirmed for human K-ras with the exonuclease-amplification coupled capture technique (EXACCT). In conclusion, the developed DNA isolation method can be used for the study of large numbers of stool samples, is independent of the age or method of stool collection and is suitable for large-scale screening studies.     

A simple method of DNA extraction for Eimeria species

A new, simple method is described for extracting DNA from coccidia (Eimeriidae) oocysts. In our hands this method works well for all Eimeria oocysts and, presumably, will work equally well for oocysts of other coccidia genera. This method combines the two steps of breaking oocyst and sporocyst walls, and dissolving the sporozoite membrane in one step. This greatly simplifies the currently used DNA extraction procedures for Eimeria species and overcomes the disadvantages of existing DNA extraction methods based on glass-bead grinding and sporozoite excystation procedures. Because all the procedures are done in a 1.5-ml microfuge tube, which minimizes the loss of DNA in the extraction procedures, this method is especially suitable for samples with small number of oocysts. In addition, this method directly lyses the oocyst and sporocyst walls as well as the sporozoite membrane in a continuous incubation; therefore, it does not require the sporozoites to be alive. The results of PCR experiments indicate that this method generates better quality of DNA than what the existing glass-bead grinding method does for molecular analysis, and is suitable for both large or small number (<10(2) oocysts) of living or dead oocyst samples.     

FDA 2014 survey of eye area cosmetics for microbiological safety

The aim of this work was to evaluate a fungal DNA extraction procedure with the lowest inputs in terms of time as well as of expensive and toxic chemicals, but able to consistently produce genomic DNA of good quality for PCR purposes. Two types of fungal biological material were tested ‐ mycelium and conidia ‐ combined with two protocols for DNA extraction using Sodium Dodecyl Sulphate (SDS) and Cetyl Trimethyl Ammonium Bromide as extraction buffers and glass beads for mechanical disruption of cell walls. Our results showed that conidia and SDS buffer was the combination that lead to the best DNA quality and yield, with the lowest variation between samples. This study clearly demonstrates that it is possible to obtain high yield and pure DNA from pigmented conidia without the use of strong cell disrupting procedures and of toxic reagents.

Significance and Impact of the Study

There are numerous methods for DNA extraction from fungi. Some rely on expensive commercial kits and/or equipments, unavailable for many laboratories, or make use of toxic chemicals such as chloroform, phenol and mercaptoethanol. This study clearly demonstrates that it is possible to obtain high yields of pure DNA from pigmented conidia without the use of strong and expensive cell disrupting procedures and of toxic reagents. The method herein described is simultaneously inexpensive and adequate to DNA extraction from several different types of fungi.