Ultraviolet B exposure of whole leaves of barley affects structure and functional organization of photosystem II

This study examines the effects of ecologically important levels of ultraviolet B radiation on protein D1 turnover and stability and lateral redistribution of photosystem II. It is shown that ultraviolet B light supported only limited synthesis of protein D1, one of the most important components of photosystem II, whereas it promoted significant degradation of proteins D1 and D2. Furthermore, dephosphorylation of photosystem II subunits was specifically elicited upon exposure to ultraviolet B light. Structural modifications of photosystem II and changes in its lateral distribution between granum membranes and stroma-exposed lamellae were found to be different from those observed after photoinhibition by strong visible light. In particular, more complete dismantling of photosystem II cores was observed. Altogether, the data reported here suggest that ultraviolet B radiation alone fails to activate the photosystem II repair cycle, as hypothesized for visible light. This failure may contribute to the toxic effect of ultraviolet B radiation, which is increasing as a consequence of depletion of stratospheric ozone.     

The irreversible photoinhibition of the photosystem II complex in leaves of Vicia faba under strong light

Exposure of the photosynthetic machinery to strong light causes the photoinhibition of the photosystem II complex. The recovery from the photoinhibition in vivo was characterized by monitoring the ratio of variable to maximum fluorescence (F_v/F_m) in detached leaves of broad bean (Vicia faba). The changes in the ratio were explained in terms of three components, namely, two saturating exponential components with half rise-times of about 15 and 120 min, respectively, and a non-recovery component. The non-recovery component increased gradually as the exposure to strong light was prolonged. Our results suggest that this irreversible component of the photoinhibition of the photosystem II complex was caused by severe stress due to strong light under which repair of the photosystem II complex was insufficient to allow full recovery. The irreversible photoinhibition is discussed in terms of both the physiology and ecology of plants.     

Light variability illuminates niche-partitioning among marine Picocyanobacteria

Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus picocyanobacteria are dominant contributors to marine primary production over large areas of the ocean. Phytoplankton cells are entrained in the water column and are thus often exposed to rapid changes in irradiance within the upper mixed layer of the ocean. An upward fluctuation in irradiance can result in photosystem II photoinactivation exceeding counteracting repair rates through protein turnover, thereby leading to net photoinhibition of primary productivity, and potentially cell death. Here we show that the effective cross-section for photosystem II photoinactivation is conserved across the picocyanobacteria, but that their photosystem II repair capacity and protein-specific photosystem II light capture are negatively correlated and vary widely across the strains. The differences in repair rate correspond to the light and nutrient conditions that characterize the site of origin of the Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus isolates, and determine the upward fluctuation in irradiance they can tolerate, indicating that photoinhibition due to transient high-light exposure influences their distribution in the ocean.     

Photoinhibition of photosynthesis and growth responses at different light levels in psbA gene mutants of the cyanobacterium Synechococcus

Photoinhibition of photosynthesis and growth responses at diffrent light levels (10, 120 and 250 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹) were studied in psbA gene mutants R2S2C3 ( psbAI gene present) and R2K1 ( psbAIIIpsbAIII genes present) of the cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp . PCC 7942 ( Anacystis nidulans R2). Mutant R2K1 (possessing form II of the D1 protein of photosystem II) was much more resistant to photoinhibition than the mutant R2S2C3 (possessing form I of the D1 protein). At moderate inhibitory light levels (100 to 300 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹) this was largely ascribed to an increased rsistance of the photosystem II reaction cetres possessing form II of the D1 protein. However, at higher light levels the higher resistance mutant R2K1 was assigned to a higher rate of photosystem II repair, i.e. turnover of the D1 protein. Moreover, our results support the hypothesis that photoinhibition of photosystem II and photoinhibitory induced quenching are due to separate processes. Results from growth experiments show that the R2K1 mutant has a slower growth rate than the R2S2C3 mutant but shows an increased survival under high light stress conditions. It is hypothesized that high resistance to photoinhibition, though allowing a better survival under high light, is not advantageous for optimal growth.     

Photoinhibition Resistance in the Red Alga Porphyra perforata: The Role of Photoinhibition Repair

Photoinhibition resistance exhibited by the high intertidal red alga Porphyra perforata relative to its subtidal congener Porphyra nereocystis was examined using the protein synthesis inhibitor chloramphenicol to separate the damage and repair components of photoinhibition. Under photoinhibitory conditions, the rates of both damage to and replacement of photoinhibition-sensitive proteins was much higher in P. nereocystis than in P. perforata. Thus, photoinhibition resistance in P. perforata appears to be due to a reduced rate of photoinhibition damage rather than to an accelerated rate of photoinhibition repair. Reduction of photoinhibition damage in P. perforata may be by means of biophysical processes which increase the radiationless decay of excitation to heat in photosystem II. Alternatively, the photoinhibition-sensitive proteins in P. perforata may have slight structural alterations that improve their stability or they may be protected by enzyme systems that quench radicals formed by overexcitation of photosystem II. Reduction of the damage component of photoinhibition is a reasonable way to limit photoinhibition in P. perforata during the severe desiccation and exposure to full sun that occur simultaneously during daily low tides, conditions under which the protein synthesis required for photoinhibition repair could not occur.     

Photoinhibition and recovery of photosynthesis in intact barley leaves at 5 and 20°C

Photoinhibition of photosynthesis and its recovery were studied in intact barley ( Hordeum vuigare L. cv. Gunilla) leaves grown in a controlled environment by exposing them to two temperatures, 5 and 20°C, and a range of photon flux densities in excess of that during growth. Additionally, photoinhibtion was examined in the presence of chloramphenicol (CAP, an inhibitor of chloroplast protein synthesis) and of 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (DCMU). Susceptibility to photoinhibition was much higher at 5 than at 20°C. Furthermore, at 20°C. CAP exacerbated photoinhibition strongly, whereas CAP had little additional effect (10%) at 5°C. These results support the model that net photoinhibition is the difference between the inactivation and repair of photosystem II (PSII); i.e. the degradation and synthesis of the reaction centre protein, Dl. Furthermore, the steady-state extent of photoinhibition was strongly dependent on temperature and the results indicated this was manifested through the effects of temperature on the repair process of PSII. We propose that the continuous repair of PS II at 20°C conferred at least some protection from photoinhibition. At 5°C the repair process was largely inhibited, with increased photoinhibition as a consequence. However, we suggest where repair is inhibited by low temperature, some protection is alternatively conferred by the photoinhibited reaction centres. Providing they are not degraded, such centres could still dissipate excitation energy non-radiatively, thereby conferring protection of remaining photochemically active centres under steady-state conditions.
A fraction of PS II centres were capable of resisting photoinhibition when the repair process was inhibited by CAP. This is discussed in relation to PS II heterogeneity. Furthermore, the repair process was not apparently activated within 3 h when barley leaves were transferred to photoinhibitory light conditions at 20°C.     

Mobilization of photosystem II induced by intense red light in the Cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp PCC7942

We use confocal fluorescence microscopy and fluorescence recovery after photobleaching to show that a specific light signal controls the diffusion of a protein complex in thylakoid membranes of the cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp PCC7942 in vivo. In low light, photosystem II appears completely immobile in the membrane. However, exposure to intense red light triggers rapid diffusion of up to approximately 50% of photosystem II reaction centers. Particularly intense or prolonged red light exposure also leads to the redistribution of photosystem II to specific zones within the thylakoid membranes. The mobilization does not result from photodamage but is triggered by a specific red light signal. We show that mobilization of photosystem II is required for the rapid initiation of recovery from photoinhibition. Thus, intense red light triggers a switch from a static to a dynamic configuration of thylakoid membrane protein complexes, and this facilitates the rapid turnover and repair of the complexes. The localized concentrations of photosystem II seen after red light treatment may correspond to specific zones where the repair cycle is active.     

Structural changes and lateral redistribution of photosystem II during donor side photoinhibition of thylakoids

The structural and topological stability of thylakoid components under photoinhibitory conditions (4,500 microE.m-2.s-1 white light) was studied on Mn depleted thylakoids isolated from spinach leaves. After various exposures to photoinhibitory light, the chlorophyll-protein complexes of both photosystems I and II were separated by sucrose gradient centrifugation and analysed by Western blotting, using a set of polyclonals raised against various apoproteins of the photosynthetic apparatus. A series of events occurring during donor side photoinhibition are described for photosystem II, including: (a) lowering of the oligomerization state of the photosystem II core; (b) cleavage of 32-kD protein D1 at specific sites; (c) dissociation of chlorophyll-protein CP43 from the photosystem II core; and (d) migration of damaged photosystem II components from the grana to the stroma lamellae. A tentative scheme for the succession of these events is illustrated. Some effects of photoinhibition on photosystem I are also reported involving dissociation of antenna chlorophyll-proteins LHCI from the photosystem I reaction center.     

Stress Tolerance of Photosystem II in Vivo: Antagonistic Effects of Water, Heat, and Photoinhibition Stresses

The in vivo photochemical activity of photosystem II was inferred from modulated chlorophyll fluorescence and photoacoustic measurements in intact leaves of several plant species (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill., Solanum tuberosum L., Solanum nigrum L.) exposed to various environmental stresses (drought, heat, strong light) applied separately or in combination. Photosystem II was shown to be highly drought-resistant: even a drastic desiccation in air of detached leaf samples only marginally affected the quantum yield for photochemistry in photosystem II. However, water stress markedly modified the responses of photosystem II to superimposed constraints. The stability of photosystem II to heat was observed to increase strongly in leaves exposed to water stress conditions: heat treatments (e.g. 42°C in the dark), which caused a complete and irreversible inhibition of photosystem II in well-watered (tomato) leaves, resulted in a small and fully reversible reduction of the photochemical efficiency of photosystem II in drought-stressed leaves. In vivo photoacoustic data indicated that photosystem I was highly resistant to both heat and water stresses. When leaves were illuminated with intense white light at 25°C, photoinhibition damage of photosystem II was more pronounced in water-stressed leaves than in undesiccated controls. However, in nondehydrated leaves, photoinhibition of photosystem II was strongly temperature dependent, being drastically stimulated at high temperatures above 38 to 40°C. As a consequence, when exposed to strong light at high temperature, photosystem II photochemistry was significantly less inhibited in dehydrated leaves than in control well-hydrated leaves. Our results demonstrate the existence of a marked antagonism between physicochemical stresses, with water stress enhancing the resistance of photosystem II to constraints (heat, strong light at high temperature) that are usually associated with drought in the field.     

A critical role for the Var2 FtsH homologue of Arabidopsis thaliana in the photosystem II repair cycle in vivo.

Using a var2-2 mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana, which lacks a homologue of the zinc-metalloprotease, FtsH, we demonstrate that this protease is required for the efficient turnover of the D1 polypeptide of photosystem II and protection against photoinhibition in vivo. We show that var2-2 leaves are much more susceptible to light-induced photosystem II photoinhibition than wild-type leaves. Furthermore, the rate of photosystem II photoinhibition in untreated var2-2 leaves is equivalent to that of var2-2 and wild-type leaves, which have been treated with lincomycin, an inhibitor of the photosystem II repair cycle at the level of D1 synthesis. This is in contrast to untreated wild-type leaves, which show a much slower rate of photosystem II photoinhibition due to an efficient photosystem II repair cycle. The recovery of var2-2 leaves from photosystem II photoinhibition is also impaired relative to wild-type. Using Western blot analysis in the presence of lincomycin we show that the D1 polypeptide remains stable in leaves of the var2-2 mutant under photoinhibitory conditions that lead to D1 degradation in wild-type leaves and that the abundance of DegP2 is not affected by the var2-2 mutation. We conclude, therefore, that the Var2 FtsH homologue is required for the cleavage of the D1 polypeptide in vivo. In addition, we identify a conserved lumenal domain in Var2 that is unique to FtsH homologues from oxygenic phototrophs.     

Light quality during growth of Tradescantia albiflora regulates photosystem stoichiometry, photosynthetic function and susceptibility to photoinhibition

Tradescantia albiflora (Kunth) was grown under two different light quality regimes of comparable light quantity: in red + far-red light absorbed mainly by photosystem I (PSI light) and yellow light absorbed mainly by photosystem II (PSII light). The composition, function and ultrastructure of chloroplasts, and photoinhibition of photosynthesis in the two types of leaves were compared. In contrast to regulation by light quantity (Chow et al. 1991. Physiol. Plant. 81: 175–182), light quality exerted an effect on the composition of pigment complexes, function and structure of chloroplasts in Tradescantia: PSII light-grown leaves had higher Chl a/b ratios, higher PSI concentrations, lower PSII/PSI reaction centre ratios and less extensive thylakoid stacking than PSI light-grown leaves. Light quality triggered modulations of chloroplast components, leading to a variation of photosynthetic characteristics. A larger proportion of primary quinone acceptor (Q_A) in PSI light-grown leaves was chemically reduced at any given irradiance. It was also observed that the quantum yield of PSII photochemistry was lower in PSI light-grown leaves. PSI light-grown leaves were more sensitive to photoinihibition and recovery was slower compared to PSII light-grown leaves, showing that the PSII reaction centre in PSI light-grown leaves was more easily impaired by photoinhibition. The increase in susceptibility of leaves to photoinhibition following blockage of chloroplast-encoded protein synthesis was greater in PSII light-grown leaves, showing that these leaves normally have a greater capacity for PSII repair. Inhibition of zeaxanthin formation by dithiothreitol slightly increased sensitivity to photoinhibition in both PSI and PSII light-grown leaves.     

Very strong UV-A light temporally separates the photoinhibition of photosystem II into light-induced inactivation and repair

When organisms that perform oxygenic photosynthesis are exposed to strong visible or UV light, inactivation of photosystem II (PSII) occurs. However, such organisms are able rapidly to repair the photoinactivated PSII. The phenomenon of photoinactivation and repair is known as photoinhibition. Under normal laboratory conditions, the rate of repair is similar to or faster than the rate of photoinactivation, preventing the detailed analysis of photoinactivation and repair as separate processes. We report here that, using strong UV-A light from a laser, we were able to analyze separately the photoinactivation and repair of photosystem II in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Very strong UV-A light at 364 nm and a photon flux density of 2600 micromol photons m(-2) s(-1) inactivated the oxygen-evolving machinery and the photochemical reaction center of PSII within 1 or 2 min before the first step in the repair process, namely, the degradation of the D1 protein, occurred. During subsequent incubation of cells in weak visible light, the activity of PSII recovered fully within 30 min and this process depended on protein synthesis. During subsequent incubation of cells in darkness for 60 min, the D1 protein of the photoinactivated PSII was degraded. Further incubation in weak visible light resulted in the rapid restoration of the activity of PSII. These observations suggest that very strong UV-A light is a useful tool for the analysis of the repair of PSII after photoinactivation.     

Contrasting behavior of higher plant photosystem I and II antenna systems during acclimation

In this work we analyzed the photosynthetic apparatus in Arabidopsis thaliana plants acclimated to different light intensity and temperature conditions. Plants showed the ability to acclimate into different environments and avoid photoinhibition. When grown in high light, plants had a faster activation rate for energy dissipation (qE). This ability was correlated to higher accumulation levels of a specific photosystem II subunit, PsbS. The photosystem II antenna size was also regulated according to light exposure; smaller antenna size was observed in high light-acclimated plants with respect to low light plants. Different antenna polypeptides did not behave similarly, and Lhcb1, Lchb2, and Lhcb6 (CP24) are shown to undergo major levels of regulation, whereas Lhcb4 and Lhcb5 (CP29 and CP26) maintained their stoichiometry with respect to the reaction center in all growth conditions. The effect of acclimation on photosystem I antenna was different; in fact, the stoichiometry of any Lhca antenna proteins with respect to photosystem I core complex was not affected by growth conditions. Despite this stability in antenna stoichiometry, photosystem I light harvesting function was shown to be regulated through different mechanisms like the control of photosystem I to photosystem II ratio and the association or dissociation of Lhcb polypeptides to photosystem I.     

Prevention of UVB Radiation-induced Epidermal Damage by Expression of Heat Shock Protein 70

Irradiation with UV light, especially UVB, causes epidermal damage via the induction of apoptosis, inflammatory responses, and DNA damage. Various stressors, including UV light, induce heat shock proteins (HSPs) and the induction, particularly that of HSP70, provides cellular resistance to such stressors. The anti-inflammatory activity of HSP70, such as its inhibition of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB), was recently revealed. These in vitro results suggest that HSP70 protects against UVB-induced epidermal damage. Here we tested this idea by using transgenic mice expressing HSP70 and cultured keratinocytes. Irradiation of wild-type mice with UVB caused epidermal damage such as induction of apoptosis, which was suppressed in transgenic mice expressing HSP70. UVB-induced apoptosis in cultured keratinocytes was suppressed by overexpression of HSP70. Irradiation of wild-type mice with UVB decreased the cutaneous level of IκB-α (an inhibitor of NF-κB) and increased the infiltration of leukocytes and levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in the epidermis. These inflammatory responses were suppressed in transgenic mice expressing HSP70. In vitro, the overexpression of HSP70 suppressed the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines and increased the level of IκB-α in keratinocytes irradiated with UVB. UVB induced an increase in cutaneous levels of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers and 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine, both of which were suppressed in transgenic mice expressing HSP70. This study provides genetic evidence that HSP70 protects the epidermis from UVB-induced radiation damage. The findings here also suggest that the protective action of HSP70 is mediated by anti-apoptotic, anti-inflammatory, and anti-DNA damage effects.     

Photoprotection in plants: a new light on photosystem II damage

Sunlight damages photosynthetic machinery, primarily photosystem II (PSII), and causes photoinhibition that can limit plant photosynthetic activity, growth and productivity. The extent of photoinhibition is associated with a balance between the rate of photodamage and its repair. Recent studies have shown that light absorption by the manganese cluster in the oxygen-evolving complex of PSII causes primary photodamage, whereas excess light absorbed by light-harvesting complexes acts to cause inhibition of the PSII repair process chiefly through the generation of reactive oxygen species. As we review here, PSII photodamage and the inhibition of repair are therefore alleviated by photoprotection mechanisms associated with avoiding light absorption by the manganese cluster and successfully consuming or dissipating the light energy absorbed by photosynthetic pigments, respectively.     

Very strong UV-A light temporally separates the photoinhibition of photosystem II into light-induced inactivation and repair

When organisms that perform oxygenic photosynthesis are exposed to strong visible or UV light, inactivation of photosystem II (PSII) occurs. However, such organisms are able rapidly to repair the photoinactivated PSII. The phenomenon of photoinactivation and repair is known as photoinhibition. Under normal laboratory conditions, the rate of repair is similar to or faster than the rate of photoinactivation, preventing the detailed analysis of photoinactivation and repair as separate processes. We report here that, using strong UV-A light from a laser, we were able to analyze separately the photoinactivation and repair of photosystem II in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Very strong UV-A light at 364 nm and a photon flux density of 2600 μmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹ inactivated the oxygen-evolving machinery and the photochemical reaction center of PSII within 1 or 2 min before the first step in the repair process, namely, the degradation of the D1 protein, occurred. During subsequent incubation of cells in weak visible light, the activity of PSII recovered fully within 30 min and this process depended on protein synthesis. During subsequent incubation of cells in darkness for 60 min, the D1 protein of the photoinactivated PSII was degraded. Further incubation in weak visible light resulted in the rapid restoration of the activity of PSII. These observations suggest that very strong UV-A light is a useful tool for the analysis of the repair of PSII after photoinactivation.     

Too much of a good thing: light can be bad for photosynthesis.

Even though light is the ultimate substrate for photosynthetic energy conversion, it can also harm plants. This toxicity is targeted to the water-splitting photosystem II and leads to damage and degradation of the reaction centre D1-polypeptide. The degradation of this very important protein appears to be a direct consequence of photosystem II chemistry involving highly oxidizing radicals and toxic oxygen species. The frequency of this damage is relatively low under normal conditions but becomes a significant problem for the plant with increasing light intensity, especially when combined with other environmental stress factors. However, the plant survives this photoinhibition through an efficient repair system which involves an autoproteolytic activity of the photosystem II complex, D1-polypeptide synthesis and reassembly of active complexes.     

Repair machinery of symbiotic photosynthesis as the primary target of heat stress for reef-building corals

In a coral-algae symbiotic system, heat-dependent photoinhibition of photosystem II (PSII) leads to coral bleaching. When the reef-building coral Acropora digitifera was exposed to light, a moderate increase of temperature induced coral bleaching through photobleaching of algal pigments, but not through expulsion of symbiotic algae. Monitoring of PSII photoinhibition revealed that heat-dependent photoinhibition was ascribed to inhibition of the repair of photodamaged PSII, and heat susceptibility of the repair machinery varied among coral species. We conclude that the efficiency of the photosynthesis repair machinery determines the bleaching susceptibility of coral species under elevated seawater temperatures.