BTB/TAZ protein MdBT2 integrates multiple hormonal and environmental signals to regulate anthocyanin biosynthesis in apple

BT2 is a BTB/TAZ domain protein with key roles in multiple stress responses and the plant development of Arabidopsis (Figueroa et al. 2005; Ren et al. 2007; Mandadi et al. 2009). Recent studies have demonstrated that apple MdBT2 functions as a negative regulator in diverse hormonal and environmental signal‐induced anthocyanin biosynthesis, suggesting that MdBT2 integrates stress signals and anthocyanin biosynthesis.     

Mechanisms regulating the expression,self-maintenance,and signaling-function of the bradykinin B2 and B1 receptors

Bradykinin (BK) is a potent short-lived effector belonging to a class of peptides known as kinins. It participates in inflammatory and vascular regulation and processes including angioedema, tissue permeability, vascular dilation, and smooth muscle contraction. BK exerts its biological effects through the activation of the bradykinin B2 receptor (BKB2R) which is G-protein-coupled and is generally constitutively expressed. Upon binding, the receptor is activated and transduces signal cascades which have become paradigms for the actions of the Galphai and Galphaq G-protein subunits. Following activation the receptor is then desensitized, endocytosed, and resensitized. The bradykinin B1 (BKB1R) is a closely related receptor. It is activated by desArg(10)-kallidin or desArg(9)-BK, metabolites of kallidin and BK, respectively. This receptor is induced following tissue injury or after treatment with bacterial endotoxins such as lipopolysacharide or cytokines such as interleukin-1 or tumor necrosis factor-alpha. In this review we will summarize the BKB2R and BKB1R mediated signal transduction pathways. We will then emphasize the relevance of key residues and domains of the intracellular regions of the BKB2R as they relate to modulating its function (signal transduction) and self-maintenance (desensitization, endocytosis, and resensitization). We will examine the features of the BKB1R gene promoter and its mRNA as these operate in the expression and self-maintenance of this inducible receptor. This communication will not cover areas discussed in earlier reviews pertaining to the actions of peptide analogs. For these we refer you to earlier reviews (Regoli and Barabé, 1980, Pharmacol Rev 32:1-46; Regoli et al., 1990, J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 15(Suppl 6):S30-S38; Regoli et al., 1993, Can J Physiol Pharmacol 71:556-557; Marceau, 1995, Immunopharmacology 30:1-26; Regoli et al., 1998, Eur J Pharmacol 348:1-10).     

植物抗旱相关基因研究进展

遭遇极端温度、干旱、高盐等胁迫时,植物需要调控多种基因,通过多种途径来抵御非生物胁迫的伤害。综述了植物在干旱胁迫发生时,信号传导和转录因子相关调控基因以及在水分运输、抗脱水、渗透调节以调节气孔开关等功能相关基因克隆的研究进展,并提出了今后开展植物抗逆研究的建议。     

Scube activity is necessary for Hedgehog signal transduction in vivo

The Hedgehog (HH) signaling pathway is a central regulator of embryonic development, controlling the pattern and proliferation of a wide variety of organs. Previous studies have implicated the secreted protein, Scube2, in HH signal transduction in the zebrafish embryo (Hollway et al., 2006; Kawakami et al., 2005; Woods and Talbot, 2005) although the nature of the molecular function of Scube2 in this process has remained undefined. This analysis has been compounded by the fact that removal of Scube2 activity in the zebrafish embryo leads to only subtle defects in HH signal transduction in vivo (Barresi et al., 2000; Hollway et al., 2006; Ochi and Westerfield, 2007; van Eeden et al., 1996; Wolff et al., 2003). Here we present the discovery of two additional scube genes in zebrafish, scube1 and scube3, and demonstrate their roles in facilitating HH signal transduction. Knocking down the function of all three scube genes simultaneously phenocopies a complete loss of HH signal transduction in the embryo, revealing that Scube signaling is essential for HH signal transduction in vivo. We further define the molecular role of scube2 in HH signaling.     

Phytochrome and UV signal transduction pathways

The phytochromes are the best studied plant photoreceptors, controlling a wide variety of responses at both whole plant and single cell levels. Three signal transduction pathways, dependent on cGMP and/or calcium, have been found to be utilized by phytochrome to control the expression of genes required for chloroplast development (e.g., CAB and FNR) and anthocyanin biosynthesis (e.g., CHS). In particular, cGMP is a second messenger positively regulating CHS gene expression whilst calcium and calmodulin act as negative regulators. In addition to phytochrome regulation of CHS we have begun to examine the signal transduction pathways utilized by UV photoreceptors. In contrast to phytochrome-mediated responses, results indicate a role for calcium and calmodulin as positive regulators of CHS gene expression in UV light.     

Immune plexins and semaphorins: old proteins,new immune functions

Plexins and semaphorins are a large family of proteins that are involved in cell movement and response. The importance of plexins and semaphorins has been emphasized by their discovery in many organ systems including the nervous (Nkyimbeng-Takwi and Chapoval, 2011; McCormick and Leipzig, 2012; Yaron and Sprinzak, 2012), epithelial (Miao et al., 1999; Fujii et al., 2002), and immune systems (Takamatsu and Kumanogoh, 2012) as well as diverse cell processes including angiogenesis (Serini et al., 2009; Sakurai et al., 2012), embryogenesis (Perala et al., 2012), and cancer (Potiron et al., 2009; Micucci et al., 2010). Plexins and semaphorins are transmembrane proteins that share a conserved extracellular semaphorin domain (Hota and Buck, 2012). The plexins and semaphorins are divided into four and eight subfamilies respectively based on their structural homology. Semaphorins are relatively small proteins containing the extracellular semaphorin domain and short intracellular tails. Plexins contain the semaphorin domain and long intracellular tails (Hota and Buck, 2012). The majority of plexin and semaphorin research has focused on the nervous system, particularly the developing nervous system, where these proteins are found to mediate many common neuronal cell processes including cell movement, cytoskeletal rearrangement, and signal transduction (Choi et al., 2008; Takamatsu et al., 2010). Their roles in the immune system are the focus of this review.     

Cellular Redistribution of Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases LAR and PTPσ by Inducible Proteolytic Processing

Most receptor-like protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPases) display a high degree of homology with cell adhesion molecules in their extracellular domains. We studied the functional significance of processing for the receptor-like PTPases LAR and PTPσ. PTPσ biosynthesis and intracellular processing resembled that of the related PTPase LAR and was expressed on the cell surface as a two-subunit complex. Both LAR and PTPσ underwent further proteolytical processing upon treatment of cells with either calcium ionophore A23187 or phorbol ester TPA. Induction of LAR processing by TPA in 293 cells did require overexpression of PKCα. Induced proteolysis resulted in shedding of the extracellular domains of both PTPases. This was in agreement with the identification of a specific PTPσ cleavage site between amino acids Pro₈₂₁ and Ile₈₂₂. Confocal microscopy studies identified adherens junctions and desmosomes as the preferential subcellular localization for both PTPases matching that of plakoglobin. Consistent with this observation, we found direct association of plakoglobin and β-catenin with the intracellular domain of LAR in vitro. Taken together, these data suggested an involvement of LAR and PTPσ in the regulation of cell contacts in concert with cell adhesion molecules of the cadherin/catenin family. After processing and shedding of the extracellular domain, the catalytically active intracellular portions of both PTPases were internalized and redistributed away from the sites of cell–cell contact, suggesting a mechanism that regulates the activity and target specificity of these PTPases. Calcium withdrawal, which led to cell contact disruption, also resulted in internalization but was not associated with prior proteolytic cleavage and shedding of the extracellular domain. We conclude that the subcellular localization of LAR and PTPσ is regulated by at least two independent mechanisms, one of which requires the presence of their extracellular domains and one of which involves the presence of intact cell–cell contacts. A key element in the regulation of cell–cell and cell– matrix contacts is the tyrosine phosphorylation of proteins that are localized in focal adhesions and at intercellular junctions (for reviews see Kemler, 1993; Clark and Brugge, 1995). While much is known about the protein tyrosine kinases involved in the phosphorylation of cell adhesion components, very little information exists about the identity of protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPases),¹ which are responsible for the dephosphorylation and thereby regulation of these structural complexes. Probable candidates are those receptor-like PTPases that contain cell adhesion molecule-like extracellular domains and could therefore regulate their intrinsic phosphatase activity in response to cell contact. Recent reports suggest that some PTPases do, in fact, possess properties that resemble those of classical cell adhesion molecules (for review see Brady-Kalnay and Tonks, 1995). A direct involvement in cell–cell contact has so far been demonstrated for PTPμ (Brady-Kalnay et al., 1993; Gebbink et al., 1993) and PTPκ (Sap et al., 1994), for which a homophilic interaction between their extracellular domains was found. The localization of PTPμ (Brady-Kalnay et al., 1995; Gebbink et al., 1995), PTPκ (Fuchs et al., 1996), and PCP-2 (Wang et al., 1996) was restricted to sites of cell–cell contact and surface expression of PTPμ (Gebbink et al., 1995), and PTPκ (Fuchs et al., 1996) was increased in a cell density-dependent manner. Moreover, a direct association of PTPκ (Fuchs et al., 1996) and PTPμ (Brady-Kalnay et al., 1995) with members of the cadherin/catenin family suggests that proteins of the cell adhesion complex represent physiological substrates for these PTPases. A possible regulatory function in cell–matrix adhesion has been proposed for LAR, another receptor-like PTPase, which associated with focal cell–substratum adhesions via the newly identified LAR interacting protein 1, LIP-1 (Serra-Pages et al., 1995).PTPμ (Gebbink et al., 1991), PTPκ (Jiang et al., 1993; Fuchs et al., 1996), PTPδ (Krueger et al., 1990; Mizuno et al., 1993, Pulido et al., 1995a), PCP-2 (Wang et al., 1996), and LAR (Streuli et al., 1988, Pot et al., 1991) are members of the so-called type II receptor-like PTPases. The extracellular domains of these PTPases contain a variable number of Ig-like and fibronectin type III-like (FNIII) domains (for review see Charbonneau and Tonks, 1992). With the exception of PCP-2 (Wang et al., 1996), these PTPases also share characteristics in their biosynthesis. They all underwent proteolytic processing by a furin-like endoprotease and were expressed at the cell surface in two subunits which were not covalently linked (Streuli et al., 1992; Yu et al., 1992; Jiang et al., 1993; Brady-Kalnay and Tonks, 1994; Gebbink et al., 1995; Pulido et al., 1995a; Fuchs et al., 1996). It was shown for LAR that the E subunit, which contains the cell adhesion molecule-like extracellular domain, was shed from the cell surface when cells were grown to a high density (Streuli et al., 1992). This shedding of the E subunit of LAR was the result of an additional proteolytic processing step that could also be induced by treatment of the cells with the phorbol ester TPA (Serra-Pages et al., 1995). An accumulation of E subunits in the supernatant of cells was also observed for PTPμ (Gebbink et al., 1995) and PTPδ (Pulido et al., 1995a), and this suggests a common mechanism in the regulation of type II PTPases. However, the effect of proteolytic processing on either the catalytic activity, the substrate specificity, or the cellular localization of these PTPases has not yet been determined. We report here that PTPσ, a recently identified new member of the family of receptor-like type II PTPases (Pan et al., 1993; Walton et al., 1993; Yan et al., 1993; Ogata et al., 1994; Zhang et al., 1994), underwent biosynthesis and proteolytic processing in a manner that resembled that of the most closely related PTPase LAR. Moreover, further proteolytic processing of PTPσ as well as of LAR could be induced by treatment of the cells with TPA or the calcium ionophore A23187. Transient expression studies indicated that TPA-induced processing of LAR, but not PTPσ, was dependent on the coexpression of PKCα. Inducible processing of both PTPases took place in the extracellular segment of the P subunit in a juxtamembrane position and led to the shedding of the E subunit. Both LAR and PTPσ were predominantly localized in regions of cell–cell contact and accumulated in dot-like structures that could be identified as adherens junctions and desmosomes by colocalization with plakoglobin (Cowin et al., 1986). Moreover, plakoglobin and β-catenin, another component of E-cadherin–containing cell adhesion complexes in adherens junctions, associated directly with the intracellular domain of LAR in vitro. The inducible shedding of the E subunit of LAR and PTPσ was followed by a redistribution of the PTPases within the cell membrane and by an internalization of the cleaved P subunits. It therefore represents a mechanism through which the phosphatase activity of these PTPases could be regulated in response to cell–cell contact. The cell adhesion molecule-like character of LAR and PTPσ was further supported by the fact that the internalization of LAR and PTPσ occurred independently of the proteolytic processing if cells were grown in calcium-depleted growth medium. The analogies in specific localization as well as internalization behavior of PTPσ and LAR, with molecules of the cadherin/catenin family, strongly suggest a direct involvement of PTPσ and LAR in the formation or maintenance of intercellular contacts.