Adjuvant trials of aromatase inhibitors: determining the future landscape of adjuvant endocrine therapy

This review will discuss the role of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) in the adjuvant setting, and will summarize major strategies behind individual adjuvant trials using aromatase inhibitors. Studies with the third generation AIs including anastrozole, letrozole and exemestane, have shown better outcome and improved therapeutic ratio over second line hormonal approaches (i.e. progestins or aminoglutethimide) and, more recently, over tamoxifen also. These promising results have led recently to testing of AIs in the adjuvant setting for postmenopausal patients. Most trials now in progress are evaluating the role of new AIs versus tamoxifen (T) given×5 years, which in most institutions is currently the standard hormonal adjuvant therapy for breast cancer. Three adjuvant approaches are being tested. First is the use of AI+T×5 years in combination versus each agent alone, as reflected in the recently completed ATAC trial. Second is a sequential approach T first×2–3 years followed by AIs×2–3 years, or the other way round; and third, T×5 years followed by AIs for additional 5 years (i.e. total duration of adjuvant hormones of 10 years). Many patients in the above trials will survive their first cancer. Hence, the non-oncological outcomes known to be affected by hormones are of rising importance. Therefore, the assessment of lipids as surrogates for cardiovascular morbidity, and of bone mineral status, as a marker for osteoporosis/bone fractures, is an important component of these trials. Also discussed in this review are proposals for future studies of AIs with focus on hormone resistance, such as early alteration of multiple hormonal agents or their intermittent use, the impact of the new generation of SERMs or ‘pure’ antiestrogens on activity of AIs, and the rising importance of AIs interacting with biologicals, cytokines or hormone modulators.     

Synthesis of some novel androstanes as potential aromatase inhibitors

Novel pyrazole and isoxazole derivatives (6-9) were synthesized as a aromatase inhibitors. Pyrazole was synthesized from hydrazine hydrate and isoxazoles from hydroxylamine hydrochloride under different conditions. Molecular docking studies were carried out for the synthesized compounds. The best score was obtained for the compound (9) followed by compound (6) while compound (8) afforded poorest of the score. Aromatase inhibitory activity for compound (6) having pyrazole ring at 2,3 position showed highest activity followed by nitrile derivative (9). Isomeric forms of isoxazole (7 and 8) showed very poor activity compared to fadrozole and aminoglutethimide. Preliminary kinetic studies have shown that both of the active compounds (6 and 9) are reversible inhibitors of the enzyme.     

Surgical issues surrounding use of aromatase inhibitors

There are important surgical issues related to the use of the third generation aromatase inhibitors in both the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. Neoadjuvant hormone therapy is effective at downstaging tumours, particularly large tumours initially thought to be inoperable or requiring mastectomy. Randomised trials have shown that the newer aromatase inhibitors letrozole and anastrozole increase the numbers of women who are suitable for breast-conservation compared with tamoxifen, and that letrozole is superior to tamoxifen in terms of clinical response.

Aromatase inhibitors are most effective in ER-rich tumours and are clinically and biologically effective in both HER2 positive and negative tumours, whereas HER2 positive tumours show a level of resistance to tamoxifen.

In neoadjuvant studies comparing aromatase inhibitors with tamoxifen, the duration of use has been 3–4 months, by which time any response is usually evident but longer treatment periods produce continued shrinkage and response. The re-excision rate following breast conservation surgery after neoadjuvant hormone therapy is favourable compared with the rates following immediate wide local excision. Local recurrence rates are acceptable in patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy and breast-conserving surgery providing post-operative radiotherapy is given.

Adjuvant aromatase inhibitors, as well as having an effect on metastatic disease and survival, reduce local and regional recurrence.     

Breast cancer prevention--clinical trials strategies involving aromatase inhibitors

Estrogens and their metabolites have been implicated in both the initiation and the prevention of breast cancer. The reduction in breast cancer incidence seen in the tamoxifen arms of the four prospective trials to date has established the proof of principle that antagonizing estrogen is a potential means of reducing breast cancer risk. However, the areas to improve on these results include: (a) enhanced efficacy, (b) reduction in the incidence of receptor-negative tumors, (c) improved overall and endocrinological side effects, and (d) improved function on end-organs other than the breast. The aromatase inhibitors offer the potential to achieve these goals in part in the following ways: (a) greater reduction in risk of disease as evidenced by superior efficacy in advanced breast cancer and by inhibition of both initiation and promotion of breast cancer, (b) reduction in receptor-negative tumors by synergy with COX-2 inhibitors resulting in growth factor inhibition, anti-angiogenesis and inhibition of tumor-associated aromatase expression, (c) fewer vasomotor and urogenital abnormalities, and (d) reduced thromboembolism and cardiovascular complications and satisfactory effects on bone metabolism. Important differences may exist between non-steroidal reversible inhibitors and steroidal irreversible inactivators in particular related to the androgenic/anabolic effects of the steroidal inactivators. Pilot studies of aromatase inhibitors described elsewhere in this session have begun in healthy women with dense mammography, or a high-risk genetic and/or histocytopathologic profile, to determine potential efficacy, as well as effects on end-organ function. A number of phase three trials with aromatase inhibitors are also underway or in planning. Among these are the BRCA 1 and 2 study of exemestane versus placebo in unaffected postmenopausal carriers, the International Breast Intervention Study 2 (IBIS 2) of anastrozole versus placebo in women with a high-risk profile, and the National Cancer Institute of Canada’s Clinical Trial Group (NCIC CTG) study of exemestane with or without celecoxib versus placebo in women at risk of the disease. For premenopausal women, combination strategies of gonadotrophin agonists and aromatase inhibitors are being investigated. The potential of using low doses of aromatase inhibitors to lower “in breast” estrogen levels without unduly perturbing plasma concentrations is also being explored. The potential of the aromatase gene functioning as an oncogene within the breast may be tied to breast density which in turn may represent both a selection tool for elevated risk and an intermediate marker of prevention. The strong link between postmenopausal estrogen levels and breast cancer risk suggests the possibility that plasma estrogen levels may be a useful intermediate marker of prevention. The aromatase inhibitors offer us the first ever tool to render women virtually free of estrogen and are potentially an exciting tool for the prevention of breast cancer.     

Endocrine effects of aromatase inhibitors and inactivators in vivo: review of data and method limitations

The so-called “third-generation” aromatase inhibitors/inactivators have become standard first-line endocrine therapy for postmenopausal women in the metastatic setting. In addition, these compounds, administered as monotherapy or in sequence with tamoxifen, are likely to become standard adjuvant therapy in most countries in the near future. In contrast to the SERMs, aromatase inhibitors may be assessed for their biochemical efficacy in vivo either by measuring their ability to suppress plasma and tissue estrogen levels or, alternatively, by measuring their ability to inhibit the conversion of tracer-labelled androstenedione into estrone. While contemporary methods for estrogen measurement (with the exception of estrone sulphate) lack the sensitivity to measure plasma estrogen levels during treatment with the most potent compounds, in vivo aromatase inhibition can be determined with a much better sensitivity. Thus, in a joint program conducted by the Royal Marsden Hospital, London and our team in Bergen, we were able to reveal profound differences between first- and second-generation aromatase inhibitors, causing 50–90% aromatase inhibition, and the three third-generation compounds, causing >98% inhibition of total body aromatization.     

Chemoprevention with aromatase inhibitors--trial strategies

Estrogen and its catechol metabolites from both the circulation and synthesized within the breast are important in the pathogenesis of breast cancer. Blocking estrogen's effects on the breast with selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMS) is an ongoing strategy. Thus, tamoxifen and raloxifene reduce risk as monotherapy. Aromatase (estrogen synthetase) inhibitors are a logical alternative to SERMS. To date, SERMS have demonstrated reduction only in estrogen–progesterone receptor positive cancers without reduction in receptor negative tumors. By inhibiting the parent estrogens and their catechol metabolites, true prevention of cancer initiation might occur and reduction not only in the receptor positive but also negative tumors might result. Ongoing adjuvant breast cancer trials are exploring aromatase inhibitors as alternatives to tamoxifen, or in sequence or in combination with tamoxifen. Relative efficacies including reduction in contralateral breast cancer, toxicities and end-organ effects and impact on quality of life, are being explored. Data from these trials will help to guide future chemoprevention strategies. Proof of principal trials in ‘high risk’ cohorts such as premalignant breast lesions, dense screening mammograms, high plasma estradiol levels or increased bone density are already ongoing. Issues such as dose, schedule, therapeutic index and mono versus combination therapy are important to define.     

Hormonal effects of aromatase inhibitors: focus on premenopausal effects and interaction with tamoxifen

Third generation aromatase inhibitors have excellent specificity. Some reports indicate that letrozole may have a minor effect on cortisol synthesis but these were not confirmed: valid comparisons with other aromatase inhibitors requires randomised study.

The putative use of a third generation inhibitor as a single agent in premenopausal women has been investigated using YM511. It was hypothesised that in this situation site-specific suppression of estrogens in breast carcinomas, without systemic effects, may lead to a down-regulation of tumour proliferation. Plasma levels of androstenedione and testosterone were significantly increased by 2 weeks treatment with YM511. Mean plasma estrone levels were suppressed, but some plasma estradiol levels were abnormally high and others abnormally low. These differential effects of YM511 on circulating estrogens supported the concept that peripheral synthesis of estrogens might be suppressed while ovarian production remained high. However, YM511 did not demonstrate anti-proliferative effects in hormone sensitive breast carcinomas.

Consideration of the pharmacology of the estrogen receptor during tamoxifen therapy indicates that tamoxifen effectively saturates the receptor (>99.94% occupancy) in postmenopausal women. The addition of an aromatase inhibitor in this situation would be very unlikely to affect the biological activity of the estrogen receptor. This provides a possible explanation why the clinical efficacy of tamoxifen combined with an aromatase inhibitor appears to be equivalent to that of tamoxifen alone.     

DCIS and aromatase inhibitors

In patients with hormone receptor positive DCIS tamoxifen reduces recurrence rates by almost 50%. Few data are available with aromatase inhibitors from randomised studies. In the ATAC study there were three DCIS lesions in the anastrozole arm and four in the tamoxifen arm in the women with ER positive invasive cancer. In the MA17 study which randomised patients to up to 5 years of letrozole or placebo there was only one DCIS event in the contralateral breast in patients taking letrozole and five on placebo. There were also four patients in this study who had DCIS in the conserved breast on placebo and none in the letrozole treated group. The few clinical data that are available therefore suggest the aromatase inhibitors are likely to be effective in DCIS. A histological review of a study of 206 postmenopausal women with invasive oestrogen receptor positive breast cancer who were randomised as part of a 14 day preoperative study to receive 2.5 mg of letrozole or 1 mg of anastrozole identified 27 patients with 28 pairs of tumours in whom there was sufficient ER positive DCIS in invasive cancer in the initial core biopsy and in the subsequent surgery specimen, to evaluate for PgR activity and proliferation. Within the DCIS both aromatase inhibitors significantly reduced PgR expression and both drugs also produced a significant fall in proliferation. There was a moderate degree of agreement between the fall in PgR in both the invasive cancer and DCIS (Kappa = 0.5; p = 0.0013) and between the fall in proliferation and between the invasive and in situ components (correlation coefficient = 0.68; p < 0.001). This study has shown significant effects of aromatase inhibitors on DCIS indicating that these agents are therapeutically active in this condition.     

Steroid sulphatase inhibitors for breast cancer therapy

In contrast to aromatase inhibitors, which are now in clinical use, the development of steroid sulphatase (STS) inhibitors for breast cancer therapy is still at an early stage. STS regulates the formation of oestrone from oestrone sulphate (E1S) but also controls the hydrolysis of dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEA-S). DHEA can be reduced to 5-androstenediol (Adiol), a steroid with potent oestrogenic properties. The active pharmacophore for potent STS inhibitors has now been identified, i.e. a sulphamate ester group linked to an aryl ring. This has led to the development of a number of STS inhibitors, some of which are due to enter Phase I trials in the near future. Such first generation inhibitors include the tricyclic coumarin-based 667 COUMATE. Aryl sulphamates, such as 667 COUMATE, are taken up by red blood cells (rbc), binding to carbonic anhydrase II (CA II), and transit the liver without undergoing first-pass inactivation. 667 COUMATE is also a potent inhibitor of CA II activity with an IC₅₀ of 17 nM. Second generation STS inhibitors, such as 2-methoxyoestradiol bis-sulphamate (2-MeOE2bisMATE), in addition to inhibiting STS activity, also inhibit the growth of oestrogen receptor negative (ER⁻) tumours in mice and are anti-angiogenic. As the active pharmacaphores for the inhibition of aromatase and STS are now known it may be possible to develop third generation inhibitors that are capable of inhibiting the activities of both enzymes. Whilst exploring the potential of such a strategy it was discovered that 667 COUMATE possessed weak aromatase inhibitory properties with an IC₅₀ of 300 nM in JEG-3 cells. The identification of potent STS inhibitors will allow the therapeutic potential of this new class of drug to be explored in post-menopausal women with hormone-dependent breast cancer. Second generation inhibitors, such as 2-MeOE2bisMATE, which also inhibit the growth of ER⁻ tumours should be active against a wide range of cancers.     

Comparison between aromatase inhibitors and sequential use

The biochemical efficacy of aromatase inhibitors and inactivators in vivo may be determined by two types of methods; by measuring plasma or tissue estrogen levels, or assessment of the conversion of the androgen substrate (in practice, androstenedione) into estrogens (estrone) by the use of tracer methods. While methods to determine plasma and tissue estrogens are limited through lack of sensitivity required to measure the very low concentrations recorded in postmenopausal women on treatment with these compounds, measurement of in vivo aromatization is an extensive procedure, applicable to a limited number of patients only. While we may correlate the mean level of aromatase inhibition achieved with different compounds to clinical efficacy, data correlating individual estrogen suppression to clinical outcome among patients treated with a specific compound is limited. The now well-characterized phenomenon of lack of cross-resistance between non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors and steroidal aromatase inactivators are likely due to biochemical effects not related to differences in total body aromatase inhibition.     

Investigation of fluorinated and bifunctionalized 3-phenylchroman-4-one (isoflavanone) aromatase inhibitors

Fluorinated isoflavanones and bifunctionalized isoflavanones were synthesized through a one-step gold(I)-catalyzed annulation reaction. These compounds were evaluated for their in vitro inhibitory activities against aromatase in a fluorescence-based enzymatic assay. Selected compounds were tested for their anti-proliferative effects on human breast cancer cell line MCF-7. Compounds 6-methoxy-3-(pyridin-3-yl)chroman-4-one (3c) and 6-fluoro-3-(pyridin-3-yl)chroman-4-one (3e) were identified as the most potent aromatase inhibitors with IC₅₀ values of 2.5 μM and 0.8 μM. Therefore, these compounds have great potential for the development of pharmaceutical agents against breast cancer.     

Comparative clinical pharmacology and pharmacokinetic interactions of aromatase inhibitors

The clinical development of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) has been closely guided by clinical pharmacological investigations. During the early phases of development studies were focused on dose-related pharmacological effectiveness and specificity. More recently attention has been given to the metabolic changes which AIs elicit, with particular regard to their potential use in early breast cancer and the prophylactic setting. Pharmacological effectiveness has been studied with plasma oestrogen assays but primary oestrogens (E1 and E2) are not helpful in comparing the third generation inhibitors: anastrozole, letrozole, exemestane. All three of these compounds suppress whole body aromatisation by >96%. Most recently, we have established that significantly greater inhibition is achieved by letrozole than anastrozole at their clinically used dosages. This more complete inhibition is paralleled by significantly greater suppression of E1S.

A broad panel of endocrine investigations has indicated that these compounds have essentially complete specificity at their clinical dosages. A minor androgenic effect of exemestane is revealed by a significant suppression of sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG). Lipid and bone biomarker data are being collected in many current studies. A pharmacokinetic interaction has been established between letrozole and tamoxifen, whereby reduced circulating levels of letrozole are found with combined application. Neither anastrozole nor letrozole have any effect on plasma concentrations of tamoxifen when given in combination with it.     

The potential role of estrogen in aromatase regulation in the breast

Aromatase is expressed in both normal and malignant breast tissues. Aromatase activity in the breast varies over a wide range. Our previous studies have demonstrated that in situ aromatization contributes to the estrogen content of breast tumors to a major extent. Consequently, alterations of aromatase activity could serve as a major determinant of tissue estradiol content. However, the mechanisms and extent of aromatase regulation in breast tissues have not been fully established. We have observed an inverse correlation between tumor aromatase activity and estrogen content in nude mice bearing xenografts of MCF-7 cells transfected with the aromatase gene. To investigate the potential role of estrogen in aromatase regulation in the breast, studies were carried out in an in vitro model. In this model, MCF-7 cells were cultured long term in estrogen-deprived medium and called by the acronym, LTED cells. We found that long-term estrogen deprivation enhanced aromatase activity by 3–4-fold when compared to the wild-type MCF-7 cells. Re-exposure of LTED cells to estrogen reduced aromatase activity to the levels of the wild-type MCF-7 cells. We also measured aromatase activity in 101 frozen breast carcinoma specimens and compared tumor aromatase activities in pre-menopausal patients versus post-menopausal patients and in post-menopausal patients with or without hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Although statistically not significant, there was a trend paralleling that observed in the in vitro studies. Aromatase activity was higher in breast cancer tissues from the patients with lower circulating estrogen levels. Our data suggest that estrogen may be involved in the regulation of aromatase activity in breast tissues.     

Breast cancer tissue estrogens and their manipulation with aromatase inhibitors and inactivators

Despite the dramatic fall in plasma estrogen levels at menopause, only minor differences in breast tissue estrogen levels have been reported comparing pre- and postmenopausal women. Thus, postmenopausal breast tissue has the ability to maintain concentrations of estrone (E₁) and estradiol (E₂) that are 2–10- and 10–20-fold higher than the corresponding plasma estrogen levels. This finding may be explained by uptake of estrogens from the circulation and/or local estrogen production. Local aromatase activity in breast tissue seems to be of crucial importance for the local estrogen production in some patients while uptake from the circulation may be more important in other patients. Beside aromatase, breast tissue expresses estrogen sulfotransferase and sulfatase as well as dehydrogenase activity, allowing estrogen storage and release in the cells as well as conversions between estrone and estradiol. The activity of the enzyme network in breast cancer tissue is modified by a variety of factors like growth factors and cytokines. Aromatase inhibitors have been used for more than two decades in the treatment of postmenopausal metastatic breast cancer and are currently investigated in the adjuvant treatment and even prevention of breast cancer. Novel aromatase inhibitors and inactivators have been shown to suppress plasma estrogen levels effectively in postmenopausal breast cancer patients. However, knowledge about the influence of these drugs on estrogen levels in breast cancer tissue is limited. Using a novel HPLC-RIA method developed for the determination of breast tissue estrogen concentrations, we measured tissue E₁, E₂ and estrone sulfate (E₁S) levels in postmenopausal breast cancer patients before and during treatment with anastrozole. Our findings revealed high breast tumor tissue estrogen concentrations that were effectively decreased by anastrozole. While E₁S was the dominating estrogen fraction in the plasma, estradiol was the estrogen fraction with the highest concentration in tumor tissue. Moreover, plasma estrogen levels did not correlate with tissue estrogen concentrations. The overall experience with aromatase inhibitors and inactivators concerning their influences on breast tissue estrogen concentrations is summarized.     

Biological and clinical effects of aromatase inhibitors in neoadjuvant therapy

Postmenopausal women with large primary oestrogen receptor-rich (>20 fmol/mg protein or 80 histoscore) breast cancers have been treated neoadjuvantly with either letrozole (2.5 or 10 mg daily n=12 in each case) or anastrozole (1 or 10 mg daily n=12 and 11, respectively). Tumour was available for analysis before treatment (wedge biopsy) and 3 months later at definitive surgery (wide local excision or mastectomy). Clinical response to treatment was assessed by sequential measurements of tumour volume based on caliper assessment, ultrasound and mammography. Results showed that in these selected groups of patients a reduction in tumour volume with treatment was observed in 43 of 47 cases (91%). Pathological responses, i.e. clear decrease in tumour cellularity or increased fibrosis was evident in 32 cases (68%). Furthermore, there was a decrease with therapy in immunohistochemical staining for Ki67 in all tumours. Staining for progesterone receptor (PgR) was reduced in all 21 PgR-positive cancers treated with letrozole and in 16 of 17 positive cancers treated with anastrozole. These effects are at least as great as those seen in a non-randomised group of patients treated with tamoxifen over the same time period (additionally tamoxifen treatment was often associated with an increase in PgR staining). The results suggest that potent specific aromatase inhibitors will be valuable in treating hormone-dependent cancers.     

Overview of adjuvant trials of aromatase inhibitors in early breast cancer

The third-generation aromatase inhibitors are an important class of drugs for use in adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with resected estrogen receptor positive breast cancer. Multiple large prospective randomized trials have established their value in this setting and provided guidance for their use in clinical management. This review will outline the trials that have provided evidence on the value of the aromatase inhibitors in the adjuvant setting as well as the ongoing trials that will expand our knowledge of how to use them most effectively.     

A summary of second-line randomized studies of aromatase inhibitors

The new generation of selective aromatase inhibitors (anastrozole, letrozole and exemestane) offer a significant efficacy and safety advantage over both older agents in this class (aminoglutethimide) and the progestins (megestrol acetate (MA)), as second-line treatment for postmenopausal women with advanced hormone-dependent breast cancer who have failed on tamoxifen therapy. Exemestane, a steroidal aromatase inhibitor, has been shown to have activity after failure with the non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors, anastrozole and letrozole, and could be used as third-line treatment. Although the newer aromatase inhibitors belong to the same class and appear, from indirect comparisons, to have similar efficacy compared with the older therapies, they have different pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles, suggesting the potential for clinical differences. Compared with exemestane and letrozole, anastrozole shows greater selectivity for aromatase, as it lacks any evidence of an effect on adrenal steroidogenesis and has no androgenic effects. Therefore, it is clear that these agents should not be considered to be similar in all respects. In summary, the introduction of the aromatase inhibitors represents a significant step forward in the treatment of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Studies in the adjuvant setting will ultimately determine whether the differences in pharmacokinetics and phamacodynamics will be of clinical relevance.     

Long-term effects of aromatase inhibitors on bone

The risk of fracture in the postmenopausal woman given aromatase inhibitors may be increased by up to 60%. This is likely to be true for all third generation drugs, but the clinical trials did not include sufficient fracture events for certainty on this issue. It would appear that most of the excess fracture risk relates to vertebral fracture and in future studies, more effort should be given to ascertaining these fractures. The likely mechanism for the increase in fracture risk is an increase in bone turnover (of about 20%) and an acceleration of bone loss. There is evidence to suggest that the residual levels of oestradiol present in the postmenopausal woman are important for bone health, and thus, the effect of these drugs is to remove this protective effect. Current clinical practice should include the measurement of bone mineral density in postmenopausal women taking these drugs and commencement of antiresorptive therapy if osteoporosis is already present.     

The combination of VEGF inhibitors and anti-oestrogen therapies in breast cancer

Despite effective treatments for oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancers, drug resistance is common and remains a significant clinical challenge. Targeting tumour vasculature by blockade of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has proved successful in a variety of cancers. Phase III clinical trials of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy showed some efficacy in breast cancer. Concomitant targeting of the VEGF and oestrogen signalling pathways has the potential to provide enhanced therapeutic benefit in oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer, and this strategy is under evaluation in clinical trials. This article summarises the rationale for this approach and clinical studies so far.