Acute cross-tolerance to opioids in heroin delta-opioid-responding Swiss Webster mice

It is generally thought that the mu receptor actions of metabolites, 6-monoacetylmorphine (6MAM) and morphine, account for the pharmacological actions of heroin. However, upon intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration in Swiss Webster mice, heroin and 6MAM act on delta receptors while morphine acts on mu receptors. Swiss Webster mice made tolerant to subcutaneous (s.c.) morphine by morphine pellet were not cross-tolerant to s.c. heroin (at 20 min in the tail flick test). Now, opioids were given in combination, s.c. (6.5 h) and i.c.v. (3 h) preceding testing the challenging agonist i.c.v. (at 10 min in the tail flick test). The combination (s.c. + i.c.v.) morphine pretreatment induced tolerance to the mu action of morphine but no cross-tolerance to the delta action of heroin, 6MAM and DPDPE and explained why morphine pelleting did not produce cross-tolerance to s.c. heroin above. Heroin plus heroin produced tolerance to delta agonists but not to mu agonists. Surprisingly, all combinations of morphine with the delta agonists produced tolerance to morphine which now acted through delta receptors (inhibited by i.c.v. naltrindole), an unusual change in receptor selectivity for morphine.     

Bremazocine induces antinociception, but prevents opioid-induced constipation and catatonia in rats and precipitates withdrawal in morphine-dependent rats

Some in vivo agonist and antagonist properties of the putative k-compound bremazocine were characterized in rats. Bremazocine, at doses from 0.015-32 mg/kg i.p., delayed nociceptive reaction on a 55 degrees C hot-plate with a dose-response curve not readily fitting a single straight line; this effect was antagonized by high doses of naloxone. In the same rats bremazocine did not delay the intestinal transit of a charcoal meal fed 5 min earlier and prevented morphine-induced constipation. This antagonism appeared to be opioid-specific and competitive, with apparent pA2 value 8.56. Catatonia induced by etorphine (0.004 mg/kg s.c.) and constipation induced by etorphine (0.004 mg/kg s.c.) and D-Ala2-D-Leu5-enkephalin (0.1 mg/kg i.p.) were completely antagonized by bremazocine (0.03-8 mg/kg i.p.). Antinociception induced by morphine (10 mg/kg i.v.) and etorphine (0.004 mg/kg s.c.) was only partly prevented. Naloxone (1 mg/kg) and bremazocine (0.015-1 mg/kg i.p.) precipitated a withdrawal syndrome, evaluated as jumping frequency, in rats rendered dependent to morphine. These data suggest the involvement of more than one opioid receptor population in bremazocine action in vivo.     

Quaternary narcotic antagonists' relative ability to prevent antinociception and gastrointestinal transit inhibition in morphine-treated rats as an index of peripheral selectivity

Single doses of naloxone (0.025 to 0.5 mg/kg) or of one of four quaternary narcotic antagonists (i.e. nalorphine allobromide, nalorphine methobromide, naloxone methobromide or naltrexone methobromide, 1 to 60 mg/kg) were given s.c. to rats before morphine, 5 mg/kg i.v. In the absence of antagonists morphine reduced G.I. transit of a charcoal meal to about 15% of drug-free controls and consistently delayed nociceptive reactions (55°C hot plate) in all animals. Doses of antagonists slightly reducing morphine antinociception (centrally effective = A) and restoring G.I. transit to about 50% of drug-free rats (peripherally effective = B) were estimated. The A:B ratio, indicating peripheral selectivity, was at least 8 for any of the quaternary antagonists given 10 min before morphine, but prolonging this interval may have resulted in a lower figure (i.e. less peripheral selectivity) because of reduced A and increased B. This was definitely so for naltrexone methobromide (A:B, > 60 at 10 min, about 1 at 80 min) and was not apparent for nalorphine methobromide according to available data, which for nalorphine allobromide and to a lesser extent for naloxone methobromide showed only an increase in B at intervals longer than 10 min. Both morphine-induced antinociception and inhibition of G.I. transit were reduced by naloxone at the lower doses tested and were fully prevented at the higher. These findings indicate that, unlike naloxone, the investigated quaternary narcotic antagonists are interesting prototype drugs for selective blockade of opiate receptors outside the CNS, although certain critical aspects, possibly biological N-dealkylation to the corresponding tertiary antagonists, condition peripheral selectivity.     

Centrally-mediated bombesin effects on gastrointestinal motility

Administration of bombesin into the lateral cerebral ventricle (i.c.v.) of rats results in a dose-related delay in gastric emptying and small intestinal transit. Recordings of intestinal intraluminal pressure in this species show that the i.c.v. peptide produces a dose-related increase in the frequency of duodenal contractions, and a complex inhibitory/excitatory jejunal effect at low and high doses, respectively. Intrathecal (i.th.) or i.c., but not intraperitoneal (i.p.), bombesin produces a dose-related slowing of gastrointestinal and colonic transit in mice. I.c.v. bombesin is 13.5 and 3406 times more potent in inhibition of gastrointestinal transit than when given by the i.th. or i.p. routes, respectively. Similarly, the i.c.v. peptide is 1.54 and over 11000 times more potent in slowing mouse colonic transit than when given by the i.th. or i.p. routes, respectively. The substance P analogue, D-Arg1, D-Pro2, D-Trp7,9, Leu11-Substance P (DAPTL-SP)(a reported bombesin antagonist in vitro) was not effective in blocking the gastrointestinal transit effects of the peptide in vivo. Transection of the spinal cord at the level of the second thoracic vertebra (T2) eliminates the gastrointestinal and colonic effects of i.th., but not i.c.v. bombesin. Thus, bombesin can affect motor function of the gut via activity within the brain or spinal cord of rats and mice; the activity of the peptide when given at the supraspinal level depends on an intact vagus nerve and adrenal-pituitary axis, while the activity of the peptide given at the spinal level appears to depend on the integrity of ascending spinal-supraspinal pathways.     

Regulation of gastrointestinal function by multiple opioid receptors

Agonist and antagonist drugs possessing selectivity for individual types of opioid receptors have been employed in vitro and in vivo to determine the mechanisms by which opioids regulate gastrointestinal functions. Selective mu opioid agonists given by intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection, by intrathecal (i.t.) injection, or by peripheral (s.c. or i.v.) injection in rats or mice decreased gastrointestinal transit and motility, inhibited gastric secretion, and suppressed experimentally-induced diarrhea. Selective delta agonists, by contrast, inhibited gastrointestinal transit after i.t., but not after i.c.v. or s.c. administration. Delta agonists also did not alter gastric secretion after i.c.v. or s.c. injection. However, delta agonists exhibited antidiarrheal effects after i.c.v., i.t., or s.c. administration. Kappa agonists given i.c.v. had no effect on gastrointestinal transit in rats or mice or on gastric secretion in rats, but exhibited antidiarrheal effects in mice. The kappa agonist U-50, 488H given peripherally increased gastric acid secretion. Different types of opioid receptors in different anatomical sites influence differently gastrointestinal motility and propulsion, gastric secretion, and mucosal transport. Brain, spinal cord, enteric neural and smooth muscle opioid receptors represent chemosensitive sites for regulation of gastrointestinal function.     

Stereospecific opiate receptors in the actions of thyrotropin releasing hormone and morphine on gastrointestinal transit

Studies in these laboratories have shown that morphine and thyrotropin releasing hormone (TRH) inhibit gastrointestinal transit in the mouse. Administration of morphine sulfate (5 mg/kg, s.c.) or TRH (10 microgram i.c.v.) to mice inhibited gastrointestinal transit as measured by the charcoal meal test. In order to determine whether the effects of TRH and morphine were mediated via stereospecific opiate receptors, the effects of two stereoisomers of an antagonist, (-) alpha -5,9-diethyl-2'-hydroxy-2-(3-furylmethyl)6,7-benzomorphan (MR2266), the active isomer and (+) alpha-5,9-diethyl-2'-hydroxy-2-(3-furylmethyl)6,7-benzomorphan (MR 2267), the inactive isomer, on morphine and TRH induced changes in gastrointestinal transit were determined. Morphine and THR induced inhibition of gastrointestinal transit was antagonized by MR 2266 (1 and 3 mg/kg, s.c.) but was unaffected by MR 2267. These studies provide evidence for the involvement of opiate receptors in the actions of morphine and TRH on gastrointestinal transit, and further suggest that the receptors are stereospecific in nature.     

Modification of antiallodynic and antinociceptive effects of morphine by peripheral and central action of fluoxetine in a neuropathic mice model

We have previously reported that serotonin concentration was reduced in the brain of mice with neuropathic pain and that it may be related to reduction of morphine analgesic effects. To further prove this pharmacological action, we applied fluoxetine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, to determine whether it suppressed neuropathic pain and examined how its different administration routes would affect antinociceptive and antiallodynic effects of morphine in diabetic (DM) and sciatic nerve ligation (SL) mice, as models of neuropathic pain. Antiallodynia and antinociceptive effect of drugs were measured by using von Frey filament and tail pinch tests, respectively. Fluoxetine given alone, intracerebroventicularly (i.c.v., 15 microg/mouse) or intraperitoneally (i.p., 5 and 10 mg/kg) did not produce any effect in either model. However, fluoxetine given i.p. enhanced both antiallodynic and antinociceptive effects of morphine. Administration of fluoxetine i.c.v., slightly enhanced only the antiallodynic effect of morphine in SL mice. Ketanserine, a serotonin 2A receptor antagonist (i.p., 1 mg/kg) and naloxone, an opioid receptor antagonist (i.p., 3 mg/kg), blocked the combined antinociceptive effect of fluoxetine and morphine. Our data show that fluoxetine itself lacks antinociceptive properties in the two neuropathy models, but it enhances the analgesic effect of morphine in the periphery and suggests that co-administration of morphine with fluoxetine may have therapeutic potential in treatment of neuropathic pain.     

Effects of neomycin on the development of tolerance to morphine antinociception.

The effects of neomycin on the development of tolerance to morphine antinociception were examined in mice. Because neomycin did not readly cross blood brain barrier, we examined the effects of neomycin following systemic, intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) and intrathecal (i.t.) injections on the morphine tolerance. Daily subcutaneous (s.c.), i.c.v. and i.t. injections of morphine produced tolerance regardless of route of administration. Both i.c.v. and i.t. neomycin, which alone produced no changes in the basal tail flick latencies, significantly attenuated the development of tolerance to antinociception produced by repeated systemic morphine, while intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of neomycin did not affect morphine tolerance. Further, i.c.v. and i.t. neomycin attenuated the development of tolerance to antinociception produced by repeated i.c.v. and i.t. morphine, respectively, which were not attenuated by systemic neomycin. This results indicate a potential role for neomycin-sensitive Ca2+ channels on the development of tolerance to the morphine antinoception.     

Possible involvement of mu1-opioid receptors in the fentanyl- or morphine-induced antinociception at supraspinal and spinal sites

Fentanyl has been shown to be a potent analgesic with a lower propensity to produce tolerance and physical dependence in the clinical setting. The present study was designed to investigate the mechanisms of fentanyl- or morphine-induced antinociception at both supraspinal and spinal sites. In the mouse tail-flick test, the antinociceptive effects induced by both fentanyl and morphine were blocked by either the mu1-opioid receptor antagonist naloxonazine or the mu1/mu2-opioid receptor antagonist beta-funaltrexamine (beta-FNA) after s.c., i.c.v. or i.t. injection. In contrast, both fentanyl and morphine given i.c.v. or i.t. failed to produce antinociception in mu1-deficient CXBK mice. These findings indicate that like morphine, the antinociception induced by fentanyl may be mediated predominantly through mu1-opioid receptors at both supraspinal and spinal sites in mice. We also determined the ED50 values for s.c.-, i.c.v.- and i.t.-administered fentanyl- or morphine-induced antinociception in mice. The ED50 values for s.c.-, i.c.v.- and i.t.-administered fentanyl-induced antinociception were 73.7, 18.5 and 1.2-fold lower than that of morphine, respectively. The present data clearly suggest the usefulness of peripheral treatment with fentanyl for the control of pain.     

Lack of antinociceptive cross-tolerance between intracerebroventricularly administered beta-endorphin and morphine or DPDPE in mice

Antinociceptive tolerance and cross-tolerance to intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) beta-endorphin, morphine, and DPDPE (D-Pen2-D-Pen5-enkephalin) induced by a prior i.c.v. administration of beta-endorphin, morphine and DPDPE, respectively, were studied in mice. Acute tolerance was induced by i.c.v. pretreatment with beta-endorphin (0.58 nmol), morphine (6 nmol) and DPDPE (31 nmol) for 120, 180 and 75 min, respectively. Various doses of beta-endorphin, morphine or DPDPE were then injected. The tail-flick and hot-plate tests were used as antinociceptive tests. Pretreatment of mice with beta-endorphin i.c.v. reduced inhibition of the tail-flick and hot-plate responses to i.c.v. administered beta-endorphin, but not morphine and DPDPE. Pretreatment of mice with morphine i.c.v. reduced inhibition of the tail-flick and hot-plate responses to morphine but not beta-endorphin. Pretreatment of mice with DPDPE reduced inhibition of the tail-flick and hot-plate responses to DPDPE but not beta-endorphin. The results indicate that one injection of beta-endorphin, morphine or DPDPE induces acute antinociceptive tolerance to its own distinctive opioid receptor and does not induce cross-tolerance to other opioid agonists with different opioid receptor specificities. The data support the hypothesis that beta-endorphin, morphine and DPDPE produce antinociception by stimulating specific epsilon, mu- and delta-opioid receptors, respectively.     

The influence of NMDA receptor agonist and antagonist on morphine state-dependent memory of passive avoidance in mice

The measurement of step-down latency in passive avoidance has been used to study memory in laboratory animals. The pre-training injection of 5 mg/kg morphine impaired memory, which was restored when 24 h later the same dose of the drug was administered. To explore the possible involvement of NMDA modulators on morphine-induced memory impairment, we have investigated the effects of intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of NMDA and the competitive NMDA antagonist, DL-AP5, on morphine-induced memory impairment or recall, on the test day. Morphine (5 mg/kg, s.c.) was administered 30 min before training to induce impairment of memory and 24 h later, 30 min before test to improve it. Pre-test administration of NMDA (0.00001, 0.0001 and 0.001 microg/mouse, i.c.v.) did not alter the retention latency compared to the saline-treated animals. But restored the memory impairment induced by pre-training morphine (5 mg/kg, s.c.). Pre-test administration of DL-AP5 (1, 3.2 and 10 microg/mouse, i.c.v.) by itself decreased the retention latencies. The same doses of DL-AP5 increased pre-training morphine-induced memory impairment. Co-administration of NMDA (0.0001 and 0.001 microg/mouse, i.c.v.) and morphine (5 mg/kg, s.c.) on the test day increased morphine memory improvement. Conversely, DL-AP5 (1, 3.2 and 10 microg/mouse, i.c.v.) inhibited morphine-induced memory recall. It is concluded that NMDA receptors may be involved, at least in part, in morphine state-dependent learning in mice.     

Antisense oligodeoxynucleotide to δ opioid receptors attenuates morphine dependence in mice

The effect of intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) treatment with antisense oligodeoxynucleotide (A-oligo) to δ opioid receptor mRNA on the morphine-induced place preference and naloxone-precipitated jumping was examined in morphine-dependent mice. Morphine (5 mg/kg, s.c.) produced a significant place preference. I.c.v. pretreatment with A-oligo (0.01–1 μg/mouse) dose-dependently attenuated this morphine (5 mg/kg, s.c.)-induced place preference, while mismatched oligodeoxynucleotide (M-oligo; 1 μg/mouse, i.c.v.) was ineffective. Naloxone (3 mg/kg, s.c.) precipitated jumping in morphine-dependent mice. I.c.v. pretreatment with A-oligo (1 μg/mouse) attenuated this naloxone (3 mg/kg, s.c.)-precipitated jumping in morphine-dependent mice, while M-oligo (1 μg/mouse, i.c.v.) was ineffective. These data demonstrate that the selective reduction in supraspinal δ opioid receptor function caused by pretreatment with A-oligo attenuated the morphine-induced place preference and naloxone-precipitated jumping in morphine-dependent mice, suggesting that the rewarding effect of and physical dependence on morphine may be modulated by central δ opioid receptors.     

Ketazocines and morphine: effects on gastrointestinal transit after central and peripheral administration

The mu agonist, morphine, and the prototype kappa agonists, ketocyclazocine and ethylketocyclazocine (EK), were studied for their effects on gastrointestinal transit. Following s.c. administration, both morphine (0.3-3 mg/kg) and ketocyclazocine (0.3-10 mg/kg) antagonized transit of an opaque marker through the small intestines of mice. Morphine (0.1-1 microgram) was also effective after intracerebroventricular (icv) administration in mice whereas ketocyclazocine (0.3-30 micrograms) was not. Similarly, while both morphine (0.3-5 mg/kg) and EK (0.6-10 mg/kg) slowed transit after s.c. injection to rats, only morphine (1-10 micrograms), but not EK (0.3-300 micrograms), was active following icv administration. Icv infusion of the mu benzomorphan, phenazocine (10-100 micrograms), slowed transit in a dose-related manner. These results indicate that there may be an anatomically distinct distribution of receptors for benzomorphan kappa agonists in both the mouse and rat, with these opiate receptors not being located near the lateral cerebral ventricles. The difference in efficacy between morphine and ketazocines in slowing gastrointestinal transit after icv administration to rodents suggests that (a) inactivity in this endpoint is a characteristic of benzomorphan kappa compounds and (b) the model may serve as a useful screen when establishing in vivo profiles of kappa agonists in mice and rats.     

Reversal of the antinociceptive effects of centrally-administered morphine by the benzodiazepine receptor antagonist Ro 15-1788

The effects of the benzodiazepine receptor antagonist, Ro 15-1788, were examined on analgesia induced by morphine after central (intracerebroventricular, i.c.v., or intrathecal, i.t.) and systemic administration. Analgesia was assessed in squirrel monkeys trained to respond under an electric shock tiltration procedure and in mice using the radiant heat tail-flick test. Central and systemic administration of morphine produced antinociceptive effects that were antagonized by 0.1 mg/kg of naloxone in both species. Ro 15-1788 antagonized the effects of morphine after central (i.c.v. or i.t.) administration but did not alter the effects of morphine given by the systemic route. This novel interaction suggests that Ro 15-1788 may be useful in pharmacologically separating neural substrates subserving opiate analgesia.     

Morphine tolerance in mice changes response of heroin from mu to delta opioid receptors

Heroin produced antinociception in the tail flick test through mu receptors in the brain of ICR and CD-1 mice, a response inhibited by 3-O-methylnaltrexone. Tolerance to morphine was produced by subcutaneous morphine pellet implantation. By the third day, the heroin response was produced through delta opioid receptors. The response was inhibited by simultaneous intracerebroventricular (i.c. v.) administration of naltrindole, a delta opioid receptor antagonist. More specifically, delta1 rather than delta2 receptors were involved because 7-benzylidenenaltrexone, a delta1 receptor antagonist, inhibited but naltriben, a delta2 antagonist, did not. Also, antinociception produced by i.c.v. heroin was inhibited by intrathecal administration of bicuculline and picrotoxin consistent with the concept that delta1 receptors in the brain mediated the antinociceptive response through descending neuronal pathways to the spinal cord to activate GABAA and GABAB receptors rather than spinal alpha2-adrenergic and serotonergic receptors activated originally by the mu agonist action in naive mice. The mu response of 6-monoacetylmorphine, a metabolite of heroin, was changed by morphine pellet implantation to a delta2 response (inhibited by naltriben but not 7-benzylidenenaltrexone). The agonist action of morphine in these morphine-tolerant mice remained mu. Thus, the opioid receptor selectivity of heroin and 6-monoacetylmorphine in the brain is changed by production of tolerance to morphine. Such a change explains how morphine tolerant mice are not cross-tolerant to heroin.     

Enterostatin (VPDPR) has anti-analgesic and anti-amnesic activities

Enterostatin (VPDPR), an anorexigenic peptide derived from the amino terminus of procolipase, significantly inhibited analgesia induced by the mu-opioid agonist morphine (5 mg/kg, s.c.) after i.c.v. administration to mice at a dose of 100 nmol. On the other hand, VPDPR (approximately 200 nmol, i.c.v.) did not attenuate analgesia induced by the kappa-opioid agonist D-Phe-D-Phe-D-Nle-D-Arg-NH2 (100 microg/mouse, i.c.v.) or delta-opioid agonist DTLET (4 nmol/mouse, i.c.v.). VPDPR (100 nmol, i.c.v.) significantly improved amnesia induced by scopolamine (0.2 mg/kg, i.p.) in mice. However, VPDPR did not enhance memory in normal mice at the same dose.     

Enterostatin (VPDPR) Has Anti-analgesic and Anti-amnesic Activites

Enterostatin (VPDPR), an anorexigenic peptide derived from the amino terminus of procolipase, significantly inhibited analgesia induced by the μ-opioidagonist morphine (5 mg/kg, s.c.) after i.c.v. administration to mice at a dose of 100 nmol. On the other hand, VPDPR (～200 nmol, i.c.v.) did not attenuate analgesia induced by the κ-opioid agonist D-Phe-D-Phe-D-Nle-D-Arg-NH₂ (100 μg/mouse, i.c.v.) or δ-opioid agonist DTLET (4 nmol/mouse, i.c.v.). VPDPR (100 nmol, i.c.v.) significantly improved amnesia induced by scopolamine (0.2 mg/kg, i.p.) in mice. However, VPDPR did not enhance memory in normal mice at the same dose.     

Effect of isradipine,a dihydropyridine-calcium antagonist on I.V. self-administration of morphine in rats

The effect of dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonist isradipine (PN 200-110) on morphine reinforcement has been investigated using i.v. self-administration test in rats. Rats were given the opportunity to self-administer a solution of morphine (1 mg/Ml, i.v.) in a 1 hr limited access paradigm (FR = 1). Within 5–7 days rats had learned to self-administer approximately 1 mg of morphine in 1 hr as evidenced by a plateau of responding. The administration of isradipine (1.2, 2.5 and 5.0 mg/kg s.c.) 90 min before the morphine self-administration session, induced dose-dependent increase in the number of morphine self-infusions with respect to basal values. This response pattern was very similar to the one observed when morphine solution was substituted by saline in trained rats not treated with isradipine. The results indicate that isradipine inhibits partially the reinforcing properties of morphine in self-administration test.     

Cholera and pertussis toxins inhibit differently hypothermic and anti-opioid effects of neuropeptide FF

In mice pretreated intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) with pertussis or cholera toxins, effects of neuropeptide FF (NPFF), on hypothermia and morphine-induced analgesia, were assessed. NPFF and a potent NPFF agonist, 1DMe (0.005-22 nmol) injected into the lateral ventricle decreased morphine analgesia and produced naloxone (2.5 mg x kg(-1), s.c.)-resistant hypothermia after administration into the third ventricle. Cholera toxin (CTX 1 microg, i.c.v.) pretreatment (24 or 96 h before) inhibited the effect of 1DMe on body temperature, but failed to reverse its anti-opioid activity in the tail-flick test. CTX reduced hypothermia induced by a high dose of morphine (8 nmol, i.c.v.) but not the analgesic effect due to 3 nmol morphine. Pertussis toxin (PTX) pretreatment inhibited both morphine-hypothermia and -analgesia but did not modify hypothermia induced by 1DMe. The present results suggest that NPFF-induced hypothermia depends on the stimulation of Gs (but not Gi) proteins. In contrast, anti-opioid effects resulting from NPFF-receptor stimulation do not involve a cholera toxin-sensitive transducer protein.     

Effects of an antisense oligonucleotide to pronociceptin and long-term prevention of morphine actions by nociceptin

To further characterize the anti-opioid action of the neuropeptide nociceptin, we examined the effects of the repeated intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) treatment (once daily for 4 days) with an antisense oligodeoxynucleotide complementary to pronociceptin mRNA, in the rat. We also investigated possible changes of the antinociceptive and hyperthermic effects induced by the i.c.v. administration of morphine, in rats i.c.v. pretreated with nociceptin 3 h before. The pretreatment with the antisense oligodeoxynucleotide, but not with a mismatched sequence (used as a control), caused an increase in spontaneous locomotor activity and produced a potentiation of the antinociceptive effect of a submaximal dose of i.c.v. morphine (1 microgram/rat). The i.c.v. pretreatment with nociceptin (2 nmol/rat, 3 h before) prevented both the antinociceptive and the hyperthermic effects of morphine (10 microgram/rat i.c.v.). These results strengthen the hypothesis of an anti-opioid action of nociceptin at supraspinal level and suggest that the neuropeptide may exert long-term modulatory effects.