When an epithelium ceases to exist – an ultrastructural study on the fate of the embryonic coelom in Epiperipatus biolleyi (Onychophora, Peripatidae)

It is an accepted fact that fusion between the coelomic cavities and the primary body cavity occurs during development in the Arthropoda. However, such a fusion is much disputed in the Onychophora. In order to clarify this subject, the fate of embryonic coelomic cavities has been studied in an onychophoran. Ultrastructural investigations in this paper provide evidence that embryonic coelomic cavities fuse with spaces of the primary body cavity in Epiperipatus biolleyi. During embryogenesis, the somatic and splanchnic portions of the mesoderm separate and the former coelomic linings are transformed into mesenchymatic tissue. The resulting body cavity therefore represents a mixture of primary and secondary (coelomic) body cavities, i.e. the ‘mixocoel’. The nephridial anlage is already present, when the ‘mixocoel’ is formed, although there is no trace of a sacculus yet. The lumen of the nephridial anlage, thus, communicates with the newly formed ‘mixocoel’. Accordingly, the lumen of the nephridial sacculus cannot be regarded as a kind of ‘persisting coelomic cavity’ in E. biolleyi. Our findings support the hypothesis that the ‘mixocoel’ was already present in the common stem species of the Onychophora and Euarthropoda.     

Origin and differentiation of nephridia in the Onychophora provide no support for the Articulata

Comparative morphology currently permits no unambiguous decision on the primary homology of the nephridia of Annelida and Arthropoda. In order to obtain additional information on this subject, ultrastructure of morphogenesis and further differentiation of nephridia was studied in the onychophoran Epiperipatus biolleyi (Peripatidae). In this species, the nephridial anlage develops by reorganization of the lateral portion of the embryonic coelomic wall that initially gives rise to a ciliated canal. All other structural components, including the sacculus, merge after the nephridial anlage has been separated from the remaining mesodermal tissue. The nephridial sacculus does not represent a ‘persisting coelomic cavity’, since it arises de novo during embryogenesis. There is no evidence for ‘nephridioblast‘ cells participating in the nephridiogenesis of Onychophora, which is in contrast to the general mode of nephridial formation in Annelida. Available data on nephridiogenesis in euarthropods (Chelicerata, Myriapoda, Crustacea, and Hexapoda) also provide no evidence for nephridia of Annelida and Arthropoda being a synapomorphy of these taxa. These findings accordingly weaken the traditional Articulata hypothesis.     

Ultrastructure and fate of the nephridial anlagen in the antennal segment of Epiperipatus biolleyi (Onychophora, Peripatidae)—evidence for the onychophoran antennae being modified legs

In this study, new ultrastructural data on the nephridiogenesis in Epiperipatus biolleyi (Onychophora) are provided, and the general distribution of nephridial organs, their vestigia, and derivatives within the onychophoran body is revised. Transient anlagen of nephridial organs proved to be present in the anteriormost segment bearing the antennae. These nephridial anlagen were never found to open to the exterior in any developmental stage studied, but are nevertheless equipped with well-developed cilia. The ciliated nephridial canals are situated at the antennal bases, hence in a more dorsal position than in the remaining body segments. In postantennal segments, the nephridial anlagen constantly arise at the bases of the presumptive legs or their derivatives. These results provide the first evidence that onychophoran antennae are modified legs that retained the original arrangement of the nephridial anlagen at their bases, despite the evolutionary change in position and function of these legs. Current assumptions are accordingly confirmed that the onychophoran antennae and the first antennae in Mandibulata (Euarthropoda) are non-homologous, since they have to be attributed to different head segments. Although the fate of the homologue of the onychophoran antennae in the Euarthropoda remains to be clarified, insights obtained in the present study question previous claims that an ocular segment is absent in extant Mandibulata.     

Nachtrag zur “Wurmtheorie” der Vertebraten-Evolution1

This paper presents some new arguments for the metameric-wonn-theory for the evolution of the Vertebrates (Gutmann 1966a). Metameric coelomoducts in Enteropneust larvae (Goodrich 1947) which should be interpreted as metanephridia show that the Enteropneusts can be derived from metameric Chordate-like predecessors. The myomeres of Branchiostoma are no solid organs as there exist sclerocoels. These must be interpreted as vestigial coelomic cavities. They can be cited as a proof for the metameric worm-theory. They function as a canal system, which gathers excretory stuff in the myomeres which these organs could otherwise not get rid of. The coelom-cavities are cleaned by the protonephridia in the gill region. Some additional details of the phylogenetic transformation of metameric coelom cavities into myomeres are reconstructed. It is shown that the problem of coelomic and myomeric metamerism cannot be solved in the way proposed in the literature concerned with this question. The metameric-worm-theory for the evolution of the Vertebrates pretends that metameric metanephridia were fused on the lower level of Vertebrate phylogeny and formed the archinephric ducts. A paper of Goodrich (1947) shows that there are similar cases of fused metanephridia in some Annelids. These are parallels to the postulated formation of the metanephridia in the lowest Vertebrates. The archinephric duct acquired its muscular coat when it was formed by fusion of metanephridia in the bodywall. Muscles of the body wall took over a new function by making peristaltic movements of the newly formed archinephric ducts possible. When the archinephric duct was moved back into the coelom it did not lose the still functioning muscular coat.     

The functional relationship between ectodermal and mesodermal segmentation in the crustacean, Parhyale hawaiensis

In arthropods, annelids and chordates, segmentation of the body axis encompasses both ectodermal and mesodermal derivatives. In vertebrates, trunk mesoderm segments autonomously and induces segmental arrangement of the ectoderm-derived nervous system. In contrast, in the arthropod Drosophila melanogaster, the ectoderm segments autonomously and mesoderm segmentation is at least partially dependent on the ectoderm. While segmentation has been proposed to be a feature of the common ancestor of vertebrates and arthropods, considering vertebrates and Drosophila alone, it is impossible to conclude whether the ancestral primary segmented tissue was the ectoderm or the mesoderm. Furthermore, much of Drosophila segmentation occurs before gastrulation and thus may not accurately represent the mechanisms of segmentation in all arthropods. To better understand the relationship between segmented germ layers in arthropods, we asked whether segmentation is an intrinsic property of the ectoderm and/or the mesoderm in the crustacean Parhyale hawaiensis by ablating either the ectoderm or the mesoderm and then assaying for segmentation in the remaining tissue layer. We found that the ectoderm segments autonomously. However, mesoderm segmentation requires at least a permissive signal from the ectoderm. Although mesodermal stem cells undergo normal rounds of division in the absence of ectoderm, they do not migrate properly in respect to migration direction and distance. In addition, their progeny neither divide nor express the mesoderm segmentation markers Ph-twist and Ph-Even-skipped. As segmentation is ectoderm-dependent in both Parhyale and holometabola insects, we hypothesize that segmentation is primarily a property of the ectoderm in pancrustacea.     

Ultrastructure of the body cavity lining in a secondary acoelomate,Microphthalmus cf. Listensis westheide (Polychaeta: Hesionidae)

The organization of the body cavity lining in selected regions of the juvenile and adult of the interstitial hesionid polychaete Microphthalmus cf. listensis is described. Tissues comprising the body cavity lining in the juvenile consist of somatic and splanchnic circular and longitudinal muscles and undifferentiated cells. Somatic and splanchnic cell layers exhibit epithelial ( = eucoelomate) organization in the pharyngeal region. In the midbody, some undifferentiated cells exhibiting mesenchymal organization persist among the epithelially organized somatic and splanchnic cells, forming a gradation between eucoelomate and acoelomate tissue organizations. A coelomic cavity is absent. Tissues comprising the body cavity lining of the adult consist of somatic and splanchnic circular and longitudinal myocytes and coelenchymal cells. Coelenchymal cells are shown from serial section analysis to be mesenchymal in organization and derived from the somatic peritoneum. A 30–65-nm coelomic cavity lies between the apices of somatic and splanchnic cell layers in the pharyngeal region. In the anterior setigerous segments, the coelom is reduced to a narrow cavity surrounded by coelenchymal cells lying midventrally between the paired ejaculatory ducts. There is a regional obliteration of the splanchnic musculature in the posterior segments so that apices of the coelenchymal cells lie in direct apposition to the basal extracellular matrix of the gut. The coeom is only present middorsally as a 0.7-μm-wide cavity. Although the coelomic cavity is highly reduced in the adult, the body cavity lining still reveals its origin from the epithelial ( = eucoelomate) organization. The findings of this study illustrate possible organizational intermediates in the evolution of the acoelomate from the eucoelomate condition in annelids.     

Development of the excretory system in a polyplacophoran mollusc: stages in metanephridial system development

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Two types of excretory systems, protonephridia and metanephridial systems are common among bilaterians. The homology of protonephridia of lophotrochozoan taxa has been widely accepted. In contrast, the homology of metanephridial systems -- including coelomic cavities as functional units -- among taxa as well as the homology between the two excretory systems is a matter of ongoing discussion. This particularly concerns the molluscan kidneys, which are mostly regarded as being derived convergently to the metanephridia of e.g. annelids because of different ontogenetic origin. A reinvestigation of nephrogenesis in polyplacophorans, which carry many primitive traits within molluscs, could shed light on these questions. RESULTS: The metanephridial system of Lepidochitona corrugata develops rapidly in the early juvenile phase. It is formed from a coelomic anlage that soon achieves endothelial organization. The pericardium and heart are formed from the central portion of the anlage. The nephridial components are formed by outgrowth from lateral differentiations of the anlage. Simultaneously with formation of the heart, podocytes appear in the atrial wall of the pericardium. In addition, renopericardial ducts, kidneys and efferent nephroducts, all showing downstream ciliation towards the internal lumen, become differentiated (specimen length: 0.62 mm). Further development consists of elongation of the kidney and reinforcement of filtration and reabsorptive structures. CONCLUSIONS: During development and in fully formed condition the metanephridial system of Lepidochitona corrugata shares many detailed traits (cellular and overall organization) with the protonephridia of the same species. Accordingly, we suggest a serial homology of various cell types and between the two excretory systems and the organs as a whole. The formation of the metanephridial system varies significantly within Mollusca, thus the mode of formation cannot be used as a homology criterion. Because of similarities in overall organization, we conclude that the molluscan metanephridial system is homologous with that of the annelids not only at the cellular but also at the organ level.     

Ultrastructure of hatchling chaetognaths (Ferosagitta hispida): Epithelial arrangement of the mesoderm and its phylogenetic implications

The trunk and tail mesoderm of hatchling chaetognaths consists of a simple myoepithelium containing four stereotypically arranged cell types, each matching in position a specific adult tissue. The trunk mesoderm includes lateral cells, longitudinal muscle cells, dorsal and ventral medial cells, and peri-intestinal cells. These correspond, respectively, to the lateral fields, longitudinal body wall muscles, dorsal and ventral perimysial cells, and periintestinal muscles of adults. Because the developing intestine does not extend into the tail, tail cells equivalent in position to peri-intestinal cells in the trunk are designated mesenterial cells. Numerous small spaces situated among the apices of hatchling mesodermal cells have the same position relative to surrounding cells as both the coelomic cavities of early embryos and the adult body cavities. We infer that these spaces in hatchlings expand and coalesce to form the definitive adult body cavities, and that these spaces and the adult body cavities derive from the embryonic coeloms. Because hatchlings lack mesenchymal mesoderm, we infer that all adult mesodermal tissues develop by elaboration of the coelomic lining of hatchlings. Because hatchlings lack cells corresponding to the squamous peritoneocytes overlying the body wall muscles of adults, we conclude that peritoneocytes are specialized adult cells that are not equivalent to cells of the embryonic coelomic lining. Finally, hatchlings contain a complete trunk/tail septum. This observation contradicts reports that this septum forms several days after hatching. It also weakens arguments that chaetognaths are bimeric rather than trimeric. © 1994 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Parasegmental appendage allocation in annelids and arthropods and the homology of parapodia and arthropodia

The new animal phylogeny disrupts the traditional taxon Articulata (uniting arthropods and annelids) and thus calls into question the homology of the body segments and appendages in the two groups. Recent work in the annelid Platynereis dumerilii has shown that although the set of genes involved in body segmentation is similar in the two groups, the body units of annelids correspond to arthropod parasegments not segments. This challenges traditional ideas about the homology of "segmental" organs in annelids and arthropods, including their appendages. Here I use the expression of engrailed, wingless and Distal-less in the arthropod Artemia franciscana to identify the parasegment boundary and the appendage primordia. I show that the early body organization including the appendage primordia is parasegmental and thus identical to the annelid organization and by deriving the different adult appendages from a common ground plan I suggest that annelid and arthropod appendages are homologous structures despite their different positions in the adult animals. This also has implications for the new animal phylogeny, because it suggests that Urprotostomia was not only parasegmented but also had parasegmental appendages similar to extant annelids, and that limb-less forms in the Protostomia are derived from limb-bearing forms.     

The microscopic anatomy and ultrastructure of the nephridium of the sipunculan Themiste hexadactyla Satô 1930) (Sipuncula: Sipunculidea)

The microscopic anatomy and ultrastructure of the nephridia of the sipunculan Themiste hexadactyla (Satô, 1930) from the Sea of Japan were studied by the histological and electron microscopic methods. The fine structures of the ciliary funnel, muscular “tongue,” excretory sac, and excretory tube of the nephridium were described. The ultrastructural features of the excretory epithelium, cupola-shaped epithelial infoldings, excretory canals, and muscular layer in the extracellular matrix of the nephridial wall were examined and described in detail. The ultrastructure of the nephridial coelomic epithelium composed of podocytes with long processes and multiciliary cells was also examined and illustrated. Characteristic cell contacts between the processes of podocytes, viz., paired “double diaphragms,” were described and illustrated for the first time.     

Development of head and trunk mesoderm in the dogfish,Scyliorhinus torazame: I. Embryology and morphology of the head cavities and related structures

Vertebrate head segmentation has attracted the attention of comparative and evolutionary morphologists for centuries, given its importance for understanding the developmental body plan of vertebrates and its evolutionary origin. In particular, the segmentation of the mesoderm is central to the problem. The shark embryo has provided a canonical morphological scheme of the head, with its epithelialized coelomic cavities (head cavities), which have often been regarded as head somites. To understand the evolutionary significance of the head cavities, the embryonic development of the mesoderm was investigated at the morphological and histological levels in the shark, Scyliorhinus torazame. Unlike somites and some enterocoelic mesodermal components in other vertebrates, the head cavities in S. torazame appeared as irregular cyst(s) in the originally unsegmented mesenchymal head mesoderm, and not via segmentation of an undivided coelom. The mandibular cavity appeared first in the paraxial part of the mandibular mesoderm, followed by the hyoid cavity, and the premandibular cavity was the last to form. The prechordal plate was recognized as a rhomboid roof of the preoral gut, continuous with the rostral notochord, and was divided anteroposteriorly into two parts by the growth of the hypothalamic primordium. Of those, the posterior part was likely to differentiate into the premandibular cavity, and the anterior part disappeared later. The head cavities and somites in the trunk exhibited significant differences, in terms of histological appearance and timing of differentiation. The mandibular cavity developed a rostral process secondarily; its homology to the anterior cavity reported in some elasmobranch embryos is discussed.     

The excretory organs in Sphaerodorum flavum (Phyllodocida, Sphaerodoridae): a rare case of co-occurrence of protonephridia, coelom and blood vascular system in Annelida

The excretory organs of Sphaerodorum flavum (Sphaerodoridae) were investigated by TEM and reconstructed from serial ultrathin sections. These organs are segmentally arranged paired protonephridia, which are in close association with a well-developed blood vascular system. Each protonephridium consists of a terminal part made up of two monociliary terminal cells (solenocytes), and a nephridioduct, formed by two cells. The two solenocytes lie close together. Each cilium is surrounded by 12 microvillar rods projecting from the perikaryon of each solenocyte. These rods form a weir-like structure in the coelomic space. The distal part of the weir is embedded in the proximal nephridioduct. The largest part of the cell bodies of the solenocytes, containing the nucleus, is lateral or basal to the weir-like structures. The lumen of the nephridioduct is formed by two multiciliated cells, which enclose the extracellular nephridial canal one behind the other. The canal opens through the nephropore beneath the cuticle without penetrating the cuticle. Both nephridioduct cells are surrounded by a blood vessel, which is partially folded into several layers. The significance of a simultaneous occurrence of protonephridial excretory organs and a well-developed blood vascular system as well as coelomic cavities is discussed. The results of this investigation indicate a close relationship of Sphaerodoridae to Phyllodocidae instead of to Syllidae within the Phyllodocida. Accepted: 27 November 2000     

Myoanatomy of Myzostoma cirriferum (Annelida,Myzostomida): Implications for the evolution of the myzostomid body plan

Studies of rare genomic marker systems suggest that Myzostomida are a subgroup of Annelida and phylogenomic analyses indicate an early divergence of this taxon within annelids. However, adult myzostomids show a highly specialized body plan, which lacks typical annelid features, such as external body annulation, coelomic cavities with metanephridia, and segmental ganglia of the nervous system. The putative loss of these features might be due to the parasitic/symbiotic lifestyle of myzostomids associated with echinoderms. In contrast, the larval anatomy and adult locomotory system resemble those of annelids. To clarify whether the myoanatomy of myzostomids reflects their relationship to annelids, we analyzed the distribution of f‐actin, a common component of muscle fibers, in specimens of Myzostoma cirriferum using phalloidin‐rhodamine labeling in conjunction with confocal laser‐scanning microscopy. Our data reveal that the musculature of the myzostomid body comprises an outer circular layer, an inner longitudinal layer, numerous dorsoventral muscles, and prominent muscles of the parapodial complex. These features correspond well with the common organization of the muscular system in Annelida. In contrast to other annelids, however, several elements of the muscular system in M. cirriferum, including the musculature of the body wall, and the parapodial flexor muscles, exhibit radial symmetry overlaying a bilateral body plan. These findings are in line with the annelid affinity of myzostomids and suggest that the apparent partial radial symmetry of M. cirriferum arose secondarily in this species. Based on our data, we provide a scenario on the rearrangements of muscle fibers that might have taken place in the lineage leading to this species. J. Morphol., 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

A lophotrochozoan twist gene is expressed in the ectomesoderm of the gastropod mollusk Patella vulgata

The twist gene is known to be involved in mesoderm formation in two of the three clades of bilaterally symmetrical animals: viz. deuterostomes (such as vertebrates) and ecdysozoans (such as arthropods and nematodes). There are currently no data on the spatiotemporal expression of this gene in the third clade, the lophotrochozoans (such as mollusks and annelids). To approach the question of mesoderm homology across bilaterians, we decided to analyze orthologs of this gene in the gastropod mollusk Patella vulgata that belongs to the lophotrochozoans. We present here the cloning, characterization, and phylogenetic analysis of a Patella twist ortholog, Pv-twi, and determine the early spatiotemporal expression pattern of this gene. Pv-twi expression was found in the trochophore larva in a subset of the ectomesoderm, one of the two sources of mesoderm in Patella. These data support the idea that twist genes were ancestrally involved in mesoderm differentiation. The absence of Pv-twi in the second mesodermal source, the endomesoderm, suggests that also other genes must be involved in lophotrochozoan mesoderm differentiation. It therefore remains a question if the mesoderm of all bilaterians is homologous.     

Early development of coelomic structures in an echinoderm larva and a similarity with coelomic structures in a chordate embryo

Early coelomic development in the abbreviated development of the sea urchin Holopneustes purpurescens is described and then used in a comparison with coelomic development in chordate embryos to support homology between a single arm of the five-armed radial body plan of an echinoderm and the single bilateral axis of a chordate. The homology depends on a positional similarity between the origin of the hydrocoele in echinoderm development and the origin of the notochord in chordate development, and a positional similarity between the respective origins of the coelomic mesoderm and chordate mesoderm in echinoderm and chordate development. The hydrocoele is homologous with the notochord and the secondary podia are homologous with the somites. The homology between a single echinoderm arm and the chordate axis becomes clear when the aboral to oral growth from the archenteron in the echinoderm larva is turned anteriorly, more in line with the anterior–posterior axis of the early zygote. A dorsoventral axis inversion in chordates is not required in the proposed homology.     

Pattern of body-wall muscle differentiation during embryonic development of Enchytraeus coronatus (Annelida: Oligochaeta; Enchytraeidae)

The plesiomorphic arrangement of body-wall musculature within the annelids is still under discussion. While polychaete groups show a great variety of patterns in their somatic muscles, the musculature of soil-living oligochaetes was thought to represent the characteristic pattern in annelids. Oligochaete body-wall muscles consist of an outer continuous layer of circular and an inner continuous layer of longitudinal muscles, forming a closed tube. Since designs of adult body musculature are influenced by evolutionary changes, additional patterns found during embryogenesis can give further information about possible plesiomorphic features. In oligochaetes, detailed cell-lineage analyses document the origin of the mesoderm and consequently the muscles, but later processes of muscle formation remain unclear. In the present work, body-wall muscle differentiation was monitored during embryogenesis of thesoil-living oligochaete Enchytraeus coronatus (Annelida) by phalloidin staining. Primary circular muscles form in a discrete anterior-to-posterior segmental pattern, whereas emerging longitudinal muscles are restricted to one ventral and one dorsal pair of primary strands, which continuously elongate towards posterior. These primary muscles establish an initial muscle-template. Secondary circular and longitudinal muscles subsequently differentiate in the previous spaces later in development. The prominent ventral primary longitudinal muscle strands on both sides eventually meet at the ventral midline due to neurulation, which moves the ventral nerve cord into a coelomic position, closing the muscle layers into a complete tube. This early embryonic pattern in E. coronatus resembles the adult body-wall muscle arrangements in several polychaete groups as well as muscle differentiation during embryonic development of the polychaete Capitella sp. I.     

Ultrastructure of mesoderm in embryos of Opisthopatus roseus (Onychophora, Peripatopsidae): revision of the "long germ band" hypothesis for Opisthopatus

In previous studies, an unusual pattern of development which resembles the "long germ band" development of some insects has been described in the onychophoran Opisthopatus cinctipes. This pattern has been proposed to be a characteristic of the genus Opisthopatus. To test this assumption, the ultrastructure of embryos of O. roseus, the sister species of O. cinctipes, was examined. Two kinds of paired, segmentally arranged coelomic cavities were found in the embryos studied: 1) dorsolateral coelomic cavities lined by extremely thin epithelia, and 2) ventral coelomic cavities situated within the anlagen of ventrolateral body appendages. Only the dorsolateral coelomic cavities can be considered "somites," since they occur earlier during embryogenesis. This is in contrast with the previous view that suggested a ventral position of "somites" in O. cinctipes. In addition, an anterior-to-posterior gradient occurs in the development of O. roseus. Based on our findings, we reevaluated the previous data on O. cinctipes. From this survey, no evidence in support of a "long germ band" hypothesis in Opisthopatus was found. Instead, the embryogenesis in representatives of Opisthopatus is more similar to that in other onychophorans than expected.     

Ultrastructure and significance of the transitory nephridia in Erpobdella octoculata (Hirudinea, Annelida)

In early developmental stages of Erpobdella octoculata two pairs of transitory nephridia occur which degenerate during the formation of the body segments. Because in the ground pattern of Annelida the first nephridia formed during ontogenesis are protonephridia, it can be assumed that the transitory nephridia of E. octoculata are homologous to the larval protonephridia (head kidneys) of Polychaeta. To test this hypothesis two cryptolarvae of E. octoculata were investigated ultrastructurally. Both pairs of transitory nephridia are serially arranged to either side of the midgut vestigium. Each organ consists of a coiled duct that opens separately to the exterior by an intraepidermal nephridiopore cell. The duct is percellular and formed by seventeen cells. Adluminal adherens and septate junctions connect all duct cells; the most proximal duct cell completely encloses the terminal end of the duct lumen. A filtration structure characteristic for protonephridia is lacking. Additionally, the entire organ lacks an inner ciliation. Morphologically and ultrastructurally the transitory nephridia of E. octoculata show far reaching congruencies with the segmental metanephridia in different species of the Hirudinea. These congruencies support the assumption that formation of transitory nephridia and definitive metanephridia in Hirudinea depends on the same genetic information. The same inherited information is assumed to cause the development of larval head kidneys and subsequently formed nephridia in different species of the Polychaeta. Thus, the presumed identical fate of a segmentally repeated nephridial anlage supports the hypothesis of a homology between the transitory nephridia in Hirudinea species and the protonephridial head kidneys in the ground pattern of the Polychaeta. We, therefore, assume that functional constraints lead to a modification of the protonephridial head kidneys in Hirudinea and explain ultrastructural differences between the transitory nephridia in Hirudinea and the protonephridia in Polychaeta. Accepted: 11 December 2000     

Growth patterns in Onychophora (velvet worms): lack of a localised posterior proliferation zone

Background  

During embryonic development of segmented animals, body segments are thought to arise from the so-called "posterior growth zone" and the occurrence of this "zone" has been used to support the homology of segmentation between arthropods, annelids, and vertebrates. However, the term "posterior growth zone" is used ambiguously in the literature, mostly referring to a region of increased proliferation at the posterior end of the embryo. To determine whether such a localised posterior proliferation zone is an ancestral feature of Panarthropoda (Onychophora + Tardigrada + Arthropoda), we examined cell division patterns in embryos of Onychophora.     

Anatomy of the trunk mesoderm in tunicates: homology considerations and phylogenetic interpretation

The tadpole stage of tunicates has played a pivotal role in understanding chordate evolution. While the organization of the mesoderm has been given high importance in comparative anatomical studies of Bilateria, this morphological character remains largely unexplored in tunicate tadpoles. For larvae of the phlebobranch ascidian Ciona intestinalis, the presence of two mesodermal pockets had been claimed, raising the possibility that paired coelomes are present in the larval ascidian. Using computer assisted 3D-reconstructions based on complete series of 1 μm-sections analyzed by light microscopy complemented by TEM-investigation of selected regions a comparative anatomical study of tadpole stages from four major tunicate clades, Aplousobranchiata, Phlebobranchiata, Stolidobranchiata, and Appendicularia is presented. In the aplousobranch Clavelina lepadiformis numerous mesodermal cells are found throughout the entire trunk plus the unpaired ventral rudiment of the pericardium. In the phlebobranch Ascidia interrupta, massive mesodermal components occur in the posterior trunk, whereas more anteriorly situated mesoderm consists of loose streaks of cells or isolated cells. This is also the case in the stolidobranch ascidians Herdmania momus and Styela plicata. In the stolidobranch Molgula occidentalis and the appendicularian Oikopleura dioica the anterior trunk is entirely devoid of mesodermal cells. TEM-investigation revealed that all mesodermal structures in the trunk of tunicate tadpoles were mesenchymal with the exception of a ventral portion of the mesoderm in C. lepadiformis, which probably corresponds to the developing pericardium, and the differentiated pericardium of the juvenile O. dioica. Thus no evidence for paired coelomic cavities in Tunicata was found. Outgroup comparison suggests that the reduction of paired coelomic cavities is an apomorphic trait of Tunicata. Within Tunicata a stepwise evolutionary reduction of the anterior larval mesenchyme is documented.