Structure and function of heterotrimeric G proteins in plants

Heterotrimeric G proteins are mediators that transmit the external signals via receptor molecules to effector molecules. The G proteins consist of three different subunits: alpha, beta, and gamma subunits. The cDNAs or genes for all the alpha, beta, and gamma subunits have been isolated from many plant species, which has contributed to great progress in the study of the structure and function of the G proteins in plants. In addition, rice plants lacking the alpha subunit were generated by the antisense method and a rice mutant, Daikoku d1, was found to have mutation in the alpha-subunit gene. Both plants show abnormal morphology such as dwarfism, dark green leaf, and small round seed. The findings revealed that the G proteins are functional molecules regulating some body plans in plants. There is evidence that the plant G proteins participate at least in signaling of gibberellin at low concentrations. In this review, we summarize the currently known information on the structure of plant heterotrimeric G proteins and discuss the possible functions of the G proteins in plants.     

Assembly and trafficking of heterotrimeric G proteins

To be activated by cell surface G protein-coupled receptors, heterotrimeric G proteins must localize at the cytoplasmic surface of plasma membranes. Moreover, some G protein subunits are able to traffic reversibly from the plasma membrane to intracellular locations upon activation. This current topic will highlight new insights into how nascent G protein subunits are assembled and how they arrive at plasma membranes. In addition, recent reports have increased our knowledge of activation-induced trafficking of G proteins. Understanding G protein assembly and trafficking will lead to a greater understanding of novel ways that cells regulate G protein signaling.     

Ric-8 regulation of heterotrimeric G proteins

Abstract

Resistance to inhibitors of cholinesterase 8 proteins (Ric-8A and Ric-8B) collectively bind the four classes of heterotrimeric G protein α subunits. Ric-8A and Ric-8B act as non-receptor guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) toward the Gα subunits that each binds in vitro and seemingly regulate diverse G protein signaling systems in cells. Combined evidence from worm, fly and mammalian systems has shown that Ric-8 proteins are required to maintain proper cellular abundances of G proteins. Ric-8 proteins support G protein levels by serving as molecular chaperones that promote Gα subunit biosynthesis. In this review, the evidence that Ric-8 proteins act as non-receptor GEF activators of G proteins in signal transduction contexts will be weighed against the evidence supporting the molecular chaperoning function of Ric-8 in promoting G protein abundance. I will conclude by suggesting that Ric-8 proteins may act in either capacity in specific contexts. The field awaits additional experimentation to delineate the putative multi-functionality of Ric-8 towards G proteins in cells.     

The role of heterotrimeric G proteins in platelet activation

Activation of platelets plays a central role in hemostasis as well as in various thromboembolic diseases like myocardial infarction or stroke. Most platelet activating stimuli function through receptors which couple to heterotrimeric G proteins of the Gi, Gq and G12 families. Recent studies have elucidated the roles of individual G proteins in the regulation of platelet functions like shape change, aggregation and granule secretion. The signaling pathways mediated by heterotrimeric G proteins operate synergistically to induce a full activation of platelets. This review summarizes recent progress in the understanding of upstream regulation of platelet activation through G protein-coupled receptors.     

Non-canonical signaling and localizations of heterotrimeric G proteins

Heterotrimeric G proteins typically transduce signals from G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) to effector proteins. In the conventional G protein signaling paradigm, the G protein is located at the cytoplasmic surface of the plasma membrane, where, after activation by an agonist-bound GPCR, the GTP-bound Gα and free Gβγ bind to and regulate a number of well-studied effectors, including adenylyl cyclase, phospholipase Cβ, RhoGEFs and ion channels. However, research over the past decade or more has established that G proteins serve non-canonical roles in the cell, whereby they regulate novel effectors, undergo activation independently of a GPCR, and/or function at subcellular locations other than the plasma membrane. This review will highlight some of these non-canonical aspects of G protein signaling, focusing on direct interactions of G protein subunits with cytoskeletal and cell adhesion proteins, the role of G proteins in cell division, and G protein signaling at diverse organelles.     

Identification of heterotrimeric G proteins in human sperm tail membranes

Heterotrimeric G proteins play important roles as signal transducing components in various mammalian sperm functions. We were interested in the distribution of G proteins in human sperm tails. Prior to membrane preparation, spermatozoa were separated from contaminating cells which are frequently present in human ejaculates. Enriched human sperm tail membranes were generated by using hypoosmotic swelling and homogenization procedures. Antisera against synthetic peptides were used to identify G proteins in immunoblots. AS 8, an antiserum directed against an amino acid sequence that is found in most G protein α-subunits, and A 86, which detects all known pertussis toxin-sensitive α-subunits, reacted specifically with a 40-kDa protein. Antisera against individual G protein α-subunits failed to detect any specific antigens in enriched tail membranes AS 36, recognizing the ã2-subunit of G proteins, identified a 35-kDa protein in sperm tail membranes. Antisera against the 36-kDa β₁-subunit did not detect any relevant proteins in the membrane fraction. Neither G protein α-subunits nor G protein β-subunits were found in the cytosol. ADP ribosylation of spermatozoal membrane or cytosolic proteins revealed no pertussis toxin-sensitive α-subunits. However, membrane preparations of nonpurified human spermatozoa contained α₂ subunits, as shown immunologically and by ADP ribosylation; they most probably derived from somatic cells which are frequently present in human ejaculates. Our results stress the fact that spermatozoa need to be purified before sperm membrane preparation to avoid misinterpretations caused by contaminating cells. Furthermore, we suggest that G proteins in membranes of human sperm tails belong to a novel subtype of G protein α-subunits; the putative β-subunit was identified as a β₂-subunit. © 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Exocytic pathway-independent plasma membrane targeting of heterotrimeric G proteins

Heterotrimeric G proteins are lipid-modified, peripheral membrane proteins that function at the inner surface of the plasma membrane (PM) to relay signals from cell-surface receptors to downstream effectors. Cellular trafficking pathways that direct nascent G proteins to the PM are poorly defined. In this report, we test the proposal that G proteins utilize the classical exocytic pathway for PM targeting. PM localization of the G protein heterotrimers alpha s beta 1 gamma 2 and alpha q beta 1 gamma 2 occurred independently of treatment of cells with Brefeldin A, which disrupts the Golgi, or expression of Sar1 mutants, which prevent the formation of endoplasmic reticulum to Golgi transport vesicles. Moreover, the palmitoylation of alpha q was unaffected by Brefeldin A treatment, even though the palmitoylation of SNAP25 was blocked by Brefeldin A. Non-palmitoylated mutants of alpha s and alpha q failed to stably bind to beta gamma and displayed a dispersed cytoplasmic localization when co-expressed with beta gamma. These findings support a refined model of the PM trafficking pathway of G proteins, involving assembly of the heterotrimer at the endoplasmic reticulum and transport to the PM independently of the Golgi.     

Mechanism of the receptor-catalyzed activation of heterotrimeric G proteins

Heptahelical receptors activate intracellular signaling pathways by catalyzing GTP for GDP exchange on the heterotrimeric G protein alpha subunit (G alpha). Despite the crucial role of this process in cell signaling, little is known about the mechanism of G protein activation. Here we explore the structural basis for receptor-mediated GDP release using electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy. Binding to the activated receptor (R*) causes an apparent rigid-body movement of the alpha5 helix of G alpha that would perturb GDP binding at the beta6-alpha5 loop. This movement was not observed when a flexible loop was inserted between the alpha5 helix and the R*-binding C terminus, which uncouples R* binding from nucleotide exchange, suggesting that this movement is necessary for GDP release. These data provide the first direct observation of R*-mediated conformational changes in G proteins and define the structural basis for GDP release from G alpha.     

RGS proteins: more than just GAPs for heterotrimeric G proteins

Members of the newly described RGS family of proteins have a common RGS domain that contains GTPase-activating activity for many Galpha subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins. Their ability to dampen signalling via Galphai-, Galphaq- and Galpha12/13-coupled pathways makes them crucial players in mediating the multitude of cellular processes controlled by heterotrimeric G proteins. Some RGS proteins also contain additional motifs that link them to other signalling networks, where they constitute effector-type molecules. This review summarizes recent findings on RGS proteins, especially those that implicate RGS proteins in more than just enhancing the GTPase activity of their Galpha subunit targets.     

Emerging non-canonical functions for heterotrimeric G proteins in cellular signaling

Abstract

Classically heterotrimeric G proteins have been described as the principal signal transducing machinery for G-protein-coupled receptors. Receptor activation catalyzes nucleotide exchange on the Gα protein, enabling Gα-GTP and Gβγ-subunits to engage intracellular effectors to generate various cellular effects such as second messenger production or regulation of ion channel conductivity. Recent genetic and proteomic screens have identified novel heterotrimeric G-protein-interacting proteins and expanded their functional roles. This review highlights some examples of recently identified interacting proteins and summarizes how they functionally connect heterotrimeric G proteins to previously underappreciated cellular roles.     

New faces in plant innate immunity: heterotrimeric G proteins

Co-existence of species seems to inevitably result in origin of parasitism and hence development of molecular mechanisms of attack and defense. Certain similarities between plant and animal defense systems point to an ancient inheritance of the innate immunity. Heterotrimeric G proteins are structurally conserved signaling molecules connecting plasma membrane bound receptors to cytoplasmic effectors. They were found in most eukaryotic organisms. Their role in human pathophysiology and animal diseases was well established. In plants these proteins were also recently implicated in innate immunity. However, molecular mechanisms governed by G proteins and providing resistance against plant pathogens seem to be different from those in animal systems and largely remain elusive. In this review we attempted to sketch current ideas of plant defense system and to present a contemporary status of heterotrimeric G proteins in plant innate immunity.     

RhoA co-ordinates with heterotrimeric G proteins to regulate efficacy

Heterotrimeric G proteins have a critical role in mediating signal transduction by ligand-stimulated GPCRs. While activation of heterotrimeric G proteins is known to proceed via the G protein guanine nucleotide cycle, there is much uncertainty regarding the process that determines efficacy, the extent of response across signaling pathways. Gα_GTP can interact with multiple binding partners, including several effectors and regulators. Cross-talk by other receptor-signaling pathways can alter the response. It remains unclear whether G protein efficacy is regulated. This lack of clarity impairs our ability to predict and manipulate the pharmacological behavior of activated G proteins. This review will discuss emerging evidence that implicates monomeric RhoA in the process that regulates G_q efficacy.     

Roles of heterotrimeric G proteins in guard cell ion channel regulation

Stomata are formed by pairs of surrounding guard cells and perform important roles in photosynthesis, transpiration and innate immunity of terrestrial plants. Ionic solutes in the cytosol of guard cells are important for cell turgor and volume change. Consequently, trans-membrane flux of ions such as K⁺, Cl⁻, and malate2⁻ through K⁺ channels and anion channels of guard cells are a direct driving force for turgor change, while the opening of calcium permeable channels can serve as a trigger of cytosolic free calcium concentration elevations or oscillations, which play second messenger roles. In plants, heterotrimeric G proteins have fewer members than in animals, but they are well investigated and found to regulate these channels and to play fundamental roles in guard cell function. This mini-review focuses on the recent understanding of G-protein regulation of ion channels on the plasma membrane of guard cells and their participation in stomatal movements.Key words: guard cell, heterotrimeric G protein, ion channel, arabidopsis thaliana, stomata, plasma membrane, patch clampHeterotrimeric G proteins, composed of Gα, Gβ and Gγ subunits, are key elements of cellular signal transduction networks. In plant species, fewer members of G proteins are present than in animals. For example, only one Gα subunit (GPA1), one Gβ subunit (AGB1) and two Gγ subunits (AGG1 and AGG2) are reported in Arabidopsis while 23 Gα, 5 Gβ and 12 Gγ subunits have been identified in human.¹ All three kinds of subunits are expressed in guard cells. Ubiquitous expression of GPA1 throughout plant was ascertained by northern and promoter::GUS analyses and RT-PCR results also indicate guard cell expression.^2–4 AGB1 is ubiquitously expressed throughout the plant and its promoter::GUS transgenic lines show strong expression in guard cells.^5–7 For Gγ subunits, RNA blots show AGG1 and AGG2 expression throughout the plant, however, reporter gene analysis shows guard cell expression of AGG2 but not AGG1.^7–9 The guard cell expression of G protein subunits implies the function of G protein in guard cell signaling and stomatal movement regulation.Stomata are microscopic pores in the epidermis of terrestrial plants, which serve as the mouths of plants for gas change since through them CO₂ enters leaves for photosynthesis and water vapor is lost as transpiration.^10–13 In addition, stomatal movements induced by pathogen and pathogen/microbe-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs or MAMPs) are a component of the plant innate immunity system.^14–16 Biotic and abiotic stresses (e.g. water deficiency, cold, pathogens) and their induced phytohormone changes (e.g. abscisic acid [ABA], ethylene) have been widely investigated in stomatal movement regulation, and stomatal apertures are directly regulated by volume change of the surrounding guard cell pairs. The accumulation/release of ionic solutes through ion channels on the guard-cell plasma membrane together with malate production/metabolism induces water influx/efflux driving increase/decrease of cell turgor and volume which co-operates with the radial reinforcement of the guard cell walls to widen/shrink stomatal aperture.^10,17 Given that mature guard cells lack plasmodesmata with neighboring cells, all ion uptake and efflux must pass through ion channels and ion transporters on the plasma membrane.In Arabidopsis guard cells, the model cell type for cell signaling of the model plant species, all three kinds of ion channels (K⁺ channels, anion channels and Ca²⁺-permeable channels) have been investigated and found to be regulated by heterotrimeric G proteins.^10,17 Their ion channel activities can be measured in intact guard cells, guard cell protoplasts, or cell membrane patches using the patch clamp technique.^15,18,19 Patch clamping can be used to measure ion fluxes in whole cells or even through a single ion channel.^20,21 The patch clamp technique under the whole-cell recording configuration can measure the currents through hyperpolarization-activated inward K⁺ channels which account for K⁺ accumulation during stomatal opening, and the depolarizationactivated outward K⁺ channels which, together with R-type and S-type anion channels, mediate solute removal during stomatal closure. Besides these ionic fluxes which directly elicit changes in turgor, Ca²⁺-permeable channels which participate in Ca²⁺ signaling are also regulated by G proteins. For better visualization of the currents through K⁺, anion and Ca²⁺permeable channels, real current traces and their idealized current/voltage relationships are indicated in Figure 1. The G-protein regulation of inward and outward K⁺ channels, S-type anion channels, and Ca²⁺-permeable channels and their significance for stomatal movements will be discussed below, and the genes encoding them which have been explored up to now also will be discussed.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Current traces and idealized current/voltage relationships of wild type guard cell plasma membrane ion channels involved in G-protein regulation (A–C), ABA inhibition of whole-cell inward K⁺ currents. (A) indicates inward K⁺ currents of wild type guard cell protoplasts in response to hyperpolarizing voltages under control conditions [Scale bar is shown in (B)]; (B) indicates inward K+ currents of wild type guard cell protoplasts with ABA treatment; (C) indicates the idealized current/voltage relationship of inward K⁺ currents for control (gray) and ABA treatments (black). (D–F), ABA activation of slow anion currents. (D) indicates anion currents of wild type under control condition and (E) shows current after ABA treatment; (F) indicates the idealized current/voltage relationship of anion currents for control (gray) and ABA treatments (black). (G–I), ABA activation of currents through Ca²⁺-permeable channels. (G) indicates currents through Ca²⁺-permeable channels of wild type under control condition and (H) shows current after ABA treatments; (I) indicates the idealized current/voltage relationship of currents through Ca²⁺-permeable channels for control (gray) and ABA treatments (black).     

The coupling of 5-oxo-eicosanoid receptors to heterotrimeric G proteins

5-Oxo-eicosatetraenoic acid (5-oxoETE) stimulated human neutrophil (PMN) and eosinophil chemotaxis, PMN hexose uptake, and PMN membrane GTP/GDP exchange. Pertussis toxin (PT), a blocker of heterotrimeric G proteins (GP), completely inhibited these responses, but proved far less effective on the same responses when elicited by leukotriene B4, C5a, FMLP, platelet-activating factor, IL-8, or RANTES chemotactic factors. 5-OxoETE also specifically bound to the membrane preparations that conducted GTP/GDP exchange. This binding was down-regulated by GTPgammaS, but not ADPgammaS, and displaced by 5-oxoETE analogues, but not by leukotriene B4, lipoxin A4, or lipoxin B4. Finally, PMN expressed PT-sensitive GP alphaiota2 and PT-resistant GP alphaq/11- and alpha13-chains; eosinophils expressed only alphai2 and alphaq/11. We conclude that 5-oxoETE activates granulocytes through a unique receptor that couples preferentially to PT-sensitive GP. The strict dependency of this putative receptor on PT-sensitive GP may underlie the limited actions of 5-oxoETE, compared with other CF, and help clarify the complex relations between receptors, GP, cell signals, and cell responses.     

Structural features of heterotrimeric G-protein-coupled receptors and their modulatory proteins

Over the past 20 years, the general mechanism for signaling through 7-transmembrane helix receptors coupled to GTP hydrolysis has been worked out. Although similar in overall organization, subtype variability and subcellular localization of components have built in considerable signaling specificity. Atomic resolution structures for many of the components have delineated the domain organization of these complex proteins and have given physical form to the idea of subtype specificity. This review describes what is known about the physical structures of the 7-transmembrane helix receptors, the heterotrimeric GTP binding coupling proteins, the adenylate cyclase and phospholipase C effector proteins, and signaling modulatory proteins, such as arrestin, phosducin, recoverin-type myristoyl switch proteins, and the pleckstrin homology domain of G-protein receptor kinase-2. These images allow experimenters to contemplate the details of the supramolecular organization of the multiprotein complexes involved in the transmission of signals across the cellular lipid bilayer.