Fish-on-a-chip: a sensitive detection microfluidic system for alzheimer's disease

Microfluidics has become an important tool in diagnosing many diseases, including neurological and genetic disorders. Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disease that irreversibly and progressively destroys memory, language ability, and thinking skills. Commonly, detection of AD is expensive and complex. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)-based microfluidic chip platform is capable of diagnosing AD at an early stage and they are effective tools for the diagnosis with low cost, high speed, and high sensitivity. In this review, we tried to provide basic information on the diagnosis of AD via FISH-based microfluidics. Different sample preparations using a microfluidic chip for diagnosis of AD are highlighted. Moreover, rapid innovations in nanotechnology for diagnosis are explained. This review will provide information on dynamic quantification methods for the diagnosis and treatment of AD. The knowledge provided in this review will help develop new integration diagnostic techniques based on FISH and microfluidics.     

Neurochemical approaches of cerebrospinal fluid diagnostics in neurodegenerative diseases

Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease dementia (PDD)/Lewy-body disease (DLB), and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) are the major causes of memory impairment and dementia. As new therapeutic agents are visible for the different diseases, there is an ultimate need for an early and an early differential diagnosis. Since cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is in direct contact with the central nervous system (CNS), potentially promising biomarkers might be seen there first. In principle, two research approaches can be considered for the laboratory diagnosis of dementias: (i) the direct detection of disease specific protein like Abeta-peptide-oligomers in AD or alpha-synuclein-aggregates in DLB and (ii) the detection of surrogate markers that show an altered pattern of expression in early stages of the disease or are used in the differential diagnosis of other dementias and thus enable an exclusion diagnosis. Especially Abeta-peptides and tau-protein measurements seem to employ a combination of these approaches. Until now it was shown that a combined determination of just these few markers (tau-proteins and Abeta-peptides) is already sufficient to achieve a high degree of diagnostic certainty in the diagnosis of AD. However although these markers seem to correlate with neuropathological changes and memory disturbances, these markers are not specific for a single form of dementia and further research is necessary to improve especially the early differential diagnosis of dementias.     

Biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease in body fluids

Various innovative diagnostic methods for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) have been developed in view of the increasing preva-lence and consequences of later-life dementia. Biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood for AD are primarily based on the detection of components derived from amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs). Published reports on CSF and blood biomarkers in AD indicate that although biomarkers in body fluids may be utilized in the clinical diagnosis of AD, there are no specific markers that permit accurate and reliable diagnosis of early-stage AD or the monitoring of disease pro-gression.     

Saliva levels of Abeta1-42 as potential biomarker of Alzheimer's disease: a pilot study

Background  

Simple, non-invasive tests for early detection of degenerative dementia by use of biomarkers are urgently required. However, up to the present, no validated extracerebral diagnostic markers for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer disease (AD) are available. The clinical diagnosis of probable AD is made with around 90% accuracy using modern clinical, neuropsychological and imaging methods. A biochemical marker that would support the clinical diagnosis and distinguish AD from other causes of dementia would therefore be of great value as a screening test. A total of 126 samples were obtained from subjects with AD, and age-sex-matched controls. Additionally, 51 Parkinson's disease (PD) patients were used as an example of another neurodegenerative disorder. We analyzed saliva and plasma levels of β amyloid (Aβ) using a highly sensitive ELISA kit.     

The impact of cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers on the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease

The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers β-amyloid(1-42) (Aβ(1-42)), total tau protein (T-tau), and tau phosphorylated at threonine 181 (P-tau(181P)) are gradually finding their way into routine clinical practice as an affirmative diagnostic tool for Alzheimer's disease (AD). These biomarkers have also been implemented in the revised diagnostic criteria for AD. The combination of the CSF biomarkers Aβ(1-42), T-tau, and P-tau(181P) leads to high (around 80%) levels of sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy for discrimination between AD and controls (including psychiatric disorders like depression) and can be applied for diagnosing AD in the predementia phases of the disease (mild cognitive impairment). The added value of CSF biomarkers could lie within those cases in which the clinical diagnostic work-up is not able to discriminate between AD and non-AD dementias. However, their discriminatory power for the differential diagnosis of dementia is suboptimal. Other CSF biomarkers, especially those that are reflective of the pathology of non-AD dementia etiologies, could improve the accuracy of differential dementia diagnosis. CSF biomarkers will be of help to establish a correct and early AD diagnosis, even in the preclinical stages of the disease, which will be of importance once disease-modifying drugs for AD become available. Variation in biomarker measurements still jeopardize the introduction of CSF biomarkers into routine clinical practice and clinical trials, but several national and international standardization initiatives are ongoing.     

Genetic markers for diagnosis and pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia in the elderly and represents an important and increasing clinical challenge in terms of diagnosis and treatment. Mutations in the genes encoding amyloid precursor protein (APP), presenilin 1 (PSEN1) and presenilin 2 (PSEN2) are responsible for early-onset autosomal dominant AD. The ε4 allele of the apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene has been recognized as a major genetic risk factor for the more common, complex, late-onset AD. Fibrillar deposits by phosphorylated tau are also a key pathological feature of AD. The retromer complex also has been reported to late-onset AD. More recently, genome-wide association studies (GWASs) identified putative novel candidate genes associated with late-onset AD. Lastly, several studies showed that circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood serum of AD patients can be used as biomarkers in AD diagnosis. This review addresses the advances and challenges in determining genetic and diagnostic markers for complex AD pathogenesis.     

CSF total tau, Aβ42 and phosphorylated tau protein as biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease

With the arrival of effective symptomatic treatments and the promise of drugs that may delay progression, we now need to identify Alzheimer’s disease (AD) at an early stage of the disease. To diagnose AD earlier and more accurately, attention has been directed toward peripheral biochemical markers. This article reviews promising potential cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers for AD focussing on their role in clinical diagnosis. In particular, two biochemical markers, CSF total tau (t-tau) protein and the 42 amino acid form of β-amyloid (Aβ42), perform satisfactorily enough to achieve a role in the clinical diagnostic settings of patients with dementia together with the cumulative information from basic clinical work-up, genetic screening, and brain imaging. These CSF markers are particularly useful to discriminate early or incipient AD from age-associated memory impairment, depression, and some secondary dementias. In order to discriminate AD from other primary dementia disorders, however, more accurate and specific markers are needed. Preliminary evidence strongly suggests that quantification of tau phosphorylated at specific sites in CSF improves early detection, differential diagnosis, and tracking of disease progression in AD.     

综述:老年性痴呆早期的基因变异研究进展

阿尔茨海默病( Alzheimer's disease,AD)又称老年性痴呆,是老年人常见的神经系统变性疾病．AD包括痴呆前阶段和痴呆阶段,年龄老化与遗传因素为目前公认的发病因素．AD的病理生理过程在痴呆诊断前的5～10年就已开始了,这一漫长的AD痴呆前阶段是治疗干预的关键时期,因此目前痴呆前阶段已成为AD相关研究的热点．本文综述了近年来有关AD各主要阶段基因变异的研究进展．     

Diagnostic utility of APOE, soluble CD40, CD40L, and Abeta1-40 levels in plasma in Alzheimer's disease

A continuous inflammatory state is associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD) evidenced by an increase in proinflammatory cytokines around beta-amyloid (Abeta) deposits. In addition, functional loss of CD40L is shown to result in diminished Amyloid precursor proton (APP) processing and microglial activation, supporting a prominent role of CD40-CD40L in AD etiology. We therefore hypothesize that a peripheral increase in Abeta may result in corresponding increase of sCD40 and sCD40L further contributing to AD pathogenesis. We measured plasma Abeta, sCD40 and sCD40L levels in 73 AD patients and compared to 102 controls matched on general demographics. We demonstrated that Abeta(1-40), levels of sCD40 and sCD40L are increased in AD and declining MMSE scores correlated with increasing sCD40L, which in turn, correlated positively with Abeta(1-42). We then combined sCD40, sCD40L, Abeta and APOE and found that this biomarker panel has high sensitivity and specificity (>90%) as a predictor of clinical AD diagnosis. Given the imminent availability of potentially disease modifying therapies for AD, a great need exists for peripheral diagnostic markers of AD. Thus, we present preliminary evidence for potential usefulness for combination of plasma sCD40, sCD40L along with Abeta(1-40) and APOE epsilon4 in improving the clinical diagnosis of AD.     

Neuroimaging Alzheimer's disease: early diagnosis, monitoring, and mechanism understanding

Neuroimaging offers a promising tool for the priority goals of current researches in Alzheimer's disease (AD) including early diagnosis, monitoring the progression of the disease and understanding the underlying mechanisms. The brain profiles of atrophy and hypometabolism associated with AD are well known and they can be used as support for early diagnosis, although the accuracy of each of these biomarkers on its own is not sufficient. An increasing number of studies highlights the relevance of disconnection processes in the development and progression of AD. The recent development of PET tracers such as the Pittsburg compound (PiB) allowing to visualize in vivo one of the neuropathological lesions characterizing AD (i.e. beta-amyloid depositions) offers a unique opportunity to better understand the mechanisms underlying this multifaceted disease.     

β-amyloid PET neuroimaging: A review of radiopharmaceutical development

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disease characterized by deposition of amyloid-β plaques that occurs even before symptoms of brain failure are clinically detectable. Whereas previously the diagnosis of AD was only routinely based on clinical assessment, an improvement over the past few years in imaging biomarkers has now led to reconsider the core of the AD diagnostic pathway. Therefore, positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracers for the in vivo imaging of amyloid plaques have been the focus of intense research. Many chemical compounds, mostly derived from the chemistry of amyloid histological staining dyes, have permitted to obtain promising brain amyloid radiopharmaceuticals. Three of them have been approved by the FDA and European regulatory bodies. The present review focuses on the development of these compounds not only as a suitable imaging biomarker to improve AD diagnosis, but also to evaluate new potential therapy.     

Circulating biomarkers of protein oxidation for Alzheimer disease: expectations within limits

Alzheimer disease (AD), the most common dementing disorder, is a multifactorial disease with complex etiology. Among different hypotheses proposed for AD one of the most corroborated is the "oxidative stress hypothesis". Although recent studies extensively demonstrated the specific oxidative modification of selected proteins in the brain of AD patients and how their dysfunction possibly correlates with the pathology, there is still an urgent need to extend these findings to peripheral tissue. So far very few studies showed oxidative damage of proteins in peripheral tissues and current findings need to be replicated. Another limit in AD research is represented by the lack of highly specific diagnostic tools for early diagnosis. For a full screening and early diagnosis, biomarkers easily detectable in biological samples, such as blood, are needed. The search of reliable biomarkers for AD in peripheral blood is a great challenge. A few studies described a set of plasma markers that differentiated AD from controls and were shown to be useful in predicting conversion from mild cognitive impairment, which is considered a prodromal stage, to AD. We review the current state of knowledge on peripheral oxidative biomarkers for AD, including proteomics, which might be useful for early diagnosis and prognosis.     

Alzheimer 病生物标志物表达的研究进展

目前,对阿尔茨海默病（AD）的诊断和治疗还存在一定的局限性和困难,临床上筛选出敏感性和特异性高的生物标志物有助于对AD的诊断和鉴别诊断,本文就与淀粉样变过程、胆固醇代谢过程及氧化应激过程的标志物的研究现状及其对临床的价值作一综述。     

Apports de la biologie dans le diagnostic des démences

Since 2007, the combined dosage of three biomarkers in the cerebrospinal fluid has been considered an essential component of procedures to help establish a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). These biomarkers include total-Tau proteins, phosphorylated variants of Tau and amyloid-beta peptides. Their levels are altered early during the course of AD but they are not useful for a differential diagnosis of other dementing disorders. Perspectives therefore focus on finding plasmatic biomarkers and developing new biomarkers that would aid discrimination between dementing disorders.     

Blood-based neurochemical diagnosis of vascular dementia: a pilot study

Blood-based tests for the differential diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) are under intensive investigation and have shown promising results with regard to Abeta40 and Abeta42 peptide species in incipient AD. Moreover, plasma Abeta40 was suggested as an independent cerebrovascular risk factor candidate. These considerations prompted us to analyse a total of 72 plasma samples in vascular dementias (VAD, n = 15), AD with cerebrovascular disease (AD with CVD, n = 7), AD (n = 15), Parkinson's disease and Parkinson's disease dementia (PD/PDD, n = 20) and 15 patients with depression that served as controls (DC) for distinct plasma amyloid-beta (Abeta) peptide patterns. For the analysis of plasma we used immunoprecipitation followed by the quantitative Abeta-SDS-PAGE/immunoblot. For comparison, CSF tau and Abeta1-42 analyses were performed. The major outcome was an increase in Abeta1-40 in plasma of VAD paralleled by a decrease in the ratio of Abeta1-38/Abeta1-40. The ratio Abeta1-38/Abeta1-40 in plasma enabled contrasts of beyond 85% and 80% for discriminating VAD from DC and all other patients, respectively. In CSF, we confirmed the typical CSF biomarker constellation of increased tau and diminished Abeta1-42 levels for AD. The diagnostic accuracy of plasma Abeta1-38/Abeta1-40 for VAD resembled the accuracy of CSF biomarkers for AD. From the presented results, we consider the ratio of plasma Abeta1-38/Abeta1-40 peptides to be a blood-based biomarker candidate for VAD.     

The study of Alzheimer’s disease biomarkers

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is by far the most common dementing illness of late life and is increasing with the ever-growing number of older adults, in particular, in developed countries. The disease is often referred to as the “Long-Goodbye” because the person with the illness slowly becomes lost to everyone a long time before the body finally gives out. Being able to detect AD earlier on during the course of the disease offers better prospects for the future, for AD individuals, their families and friends as well as on the economy, as a whole. Unfortunately, such a detection technique is not yet, available. However, there are a number of promising biological markers (biomarkers) that correlate well with clinical cognitive tests of individuals and/or postmortem histopathological manifestations of the disease, especially when at least two markers are used for the diagnosis. Biosensors are tools that combine a biochemical binding element to a signal conversion unit and are already being used in the study of some AD biomarkers. However, their use in clinical diagnosis remains a challenge. Introduction of nanotechnology leading to nanobiosensors has several potential advantages over other clinical and/or existing analytical tools, including increased assay speed, flexibility, reduced cost of diagnostic testing, potential to deliver molecular diagnostic tools to family general practitioners, and other health care systems. Even more important, nano-based assays have the potential to detect target proteins at attomolar concentration level. They are, therefore, being increasingly exploited for the detection of early metabolic changes associated with diseases. Because brain damage is irreversible, the use of nanotechnology is particularly important in AD and other neurodegenerative disorders. Nanosensors can also facilitate and enable pointofcare-testing (POCT). This article reviews the basic biochemical processes that lead to AD pathology, current biomarkers for AD, and the current role of nanosensor technology for the study of AD biomarkers. Furthermore, it discusses the huge potential of nanosensing to deliver new molecular diagnostic strategies to AD research.     

Isoprostanes and related products of lipid peroxidation in neurodegenerative diseases

Lipid peroxidation is a major outcome of free radical-mediated injury to brain, where it directly damages membranes and generates a number of oxidized products. Some of the chemically and metabolically stable oxidation products are useful in vivo biomarkers of lipid peroxidation. These include the isoprostanes (IsoPs) and isofurans (IsoFs), derived from arachidonic acid (AA), and neuroprostanes (NeuroPs), derived from docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). We have shown increased levels of IsoPs, NeuroPs, and IsoFs in diseased regions of brain from patients who died from advanced Alzheimer's disease (AD) or Parkinson's disease (PD). Increased cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of IsoPs are present in patients with AD or Huntington's disease (HD) early in the course of their illness, and CSF IsoPs may improve the laboratory diagnostic accuracy for AD. In contrast, quantification of IsoPs in plasma and urine of AD patients has yielded inconsistent results. These results indicate that brain lipid peroxidation is a potential therapeutic target early in the course of AD and HD, that CSF IsoPs may aid in the assessment of anti-oxidant experimental therapeutics and laboratory diagnosis of AD.     

Diagnostic and economic evaluation of new biomarkersfor Alzheimer¿s disease: the research protocol of a prospective cohort study

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: New research criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) have recently been developed to enable an early diagnosis of AD pathophysiologyby relying on emerging biomarkers. To enable efficient allocation of health care resources, evidence is needed to support decision makers on the adoption of emerging biomarkers in clinical practice. The research goals are to 1) assess the diagnostic test accuracy of current clinical diagnostic work-up and emerging biomarkers in MRI, PET and CSF, 2) perform a cost-consequence analysis and 3) assess long-term cost-effectiveness by an economic model.Methods/designIn a cohort design 223 consecutive patients suspected of having a primary neurodegenerative disease are approached in four academic memory clinics and followed for two years. Clinical data and data on quality of life, costs and emerging biomarkers are gathered.Diagnostic test accuracy is determined by relating the clinical practice and new research criteria diagnoses to the reference diagnosis. The clinical practice diagnosis at baseline is reflected by a consensus procedure among experts using clinical information only (no biomarkers). The diagnosis based on the new research criteria is reflected by decision rules that combine clinical and biomarker information. The reference diagnosis is determined by a consensus procedure among experts based on clinical information on the course of symptoms over a two-year time period.A decision analytic model is built combining available evidence from different resources among which (accuracy) results from the study, literature and expert opinion to assess long-term cost-effectiveness of the emerging biomarkers. DISCUSSION: Several other multi-centre trials study the relative value of new biomarkers for early evaluation of AD and related disorders. The uniqueness of this study is the assessment of resource utilization and quality of life to enable an economic evaluation. The study results are generalizable to a population of patients who are referred to a memory clinic due to their memory problems.Trial registrationNCT01450891.     

磁共振技术在轻度认知障碍与阿尔茨海默病中的研究进展

阿尔茨海默病(Alzheimer’s disease,AD)是当今老年人最常见的一种原发性神经退行性疾病。其主要病理学特征表现为神经元的脱失、神经纤维缠结及老年斑形成。轻度认知障碍(mild cognitive impairment,MCI)被认为是AD及其他老年痴呆症的前驱阶段,可进一步转化成AD,且MCI与AD有着相似的病理变化。随着MCI和AD患病数的逐年增加,其给患者家属及社会增添了巨大负担,因此,对MCI和AD作出早期诊断变得尤为重要。然而,MCI和AD早期的临床表现并不突出,且实验室检查也缺乏足够的特异性,当临床医生做出明确诊断时,多数患者已处于AD的中晚期。近年来,随着磁共振技术的不断发展,多种磁共振技术已广泛地应用于MCI和AD的研究中,并为MCI及AD的早期诊断提供了重要的影像学依据。本文分别从结构性磁共振(s MRI)、静息态f MRI、磁共振弥散张量成像(DTI)、磁共振波谱成像(MRS)、磁敏感加权成像(SWI)及MRI分子影像几个方面,阐述多种磁共振技术在MCI和AD研究中的进展。