SEACing the GAP that nEGOCiates TORC1 activation

The target of rapamycin complex 1 (TORC1) regulates eukaryotic cell growth in response to a variety of input signals. In S. cerevisiae, amino acids activate TORC1 through the Rag guanosine triphosphatase (GTPase) heterodimer composed of Gtr1 and Gtr2 found together with Ego1 and Ego3 in the EGO complex (EGOC). The GTPase activity of Gtr1 is regulated by the SEA complex (SEAC). Specifically, SEACIT, a SEAC subcomplex containing Iml1, Npr2, and Npr3 functions as a GTPase activator (GAP) for Gtr1 to decrease the activity of TORC1 and, consequently, growth, after amino acid deprivation. Here, we present genetic epistasis data, which show that SEACAT, the other SEAC subcomplex, containing Seh1, Sea2–4, and Sec13, antagonizes the GAP function of SEACIT. Orthologs of EGOC (Ragulator), SEACIT (GATOR1), and SEACAT (GATOR2) are present in higher eukaryotes, highlighting the remarkable conservation, from yeast to man, of Rag GTPase and TORC1 regulation.     

Tissue Specific Roles for the Ribosome Biogenesis Factor Wdr43 in Zebrafish Development

During vertebrate craniofacial development, neural crest cells (NCCs) contribute to most of the craniofacial pharyngeal skeleton. Defects in NCC specification, migration and differentiation resulting in malformations in the craniofacial complex are associated with human craniofacial disorders including Treacher-Collins Syndrome, caused by mutations in TCOF1. It has been hypothesized that perturbed ribosome biogenesis and resulting p53 mediated neuroepithelial apoptosis results in NCC hypoplasia in mouse Tcof1 mutants. However, the underlying mechanisms linking ribosome biogenesis and NCC development remain poorly understood. Here we report a new zebrafish mutant, fantome (fan), which harbors a point mutation and predicted premature stop codon in zebrafish wdr43, the ortholog to yeast UTP5. Although wdr43 mRNA is widely expressed during early zebrafish development, and its deficiency triggers early neural, eye, heart and pharyngeal arch defects, later defects appear fairly restricted to NCC derived craniofacial cartilages. Here we show that the C-terminus of Wdr43, which is absent in fan mutant protein, is both necessary and sufficient to mediate its nucleolar localization and protein interactions in metazoans. We demonstrate that Wdr43 functions in ribosome biogenesis, and that defects observed in fan mutants are mediated by a p53 dependent pathway. Finally, we show that proper localization of a variety of nucleolar proteins, including TCOF1, is dependent on that of WDR43. Together, our findings provide new insight into roles for Wdr43 in development, ribosome biogenesis, and also ribosomopathy-induced craniofacial phenotypes including Treacher-Collins Syndrome.     

The Msd1–Wdr8–Pkl1 complex anchors microtubule minus ends to fission yeast spindle pole bodies

The minus ends of spindle microtubules are anchored to a microtubule-organizing center. The conserved Msd1/SSX2IP proteins are localized to the spindle pole body (SPB) and the centrosome in fission yeast and humans, respectively, and play a critical role in microtubule anchoring. In this paper, we show that fission yeast Msd1 forms a ternary complex with another conserved protein, Wdr8, and the minus end–directed Pkl1/kinesin-14. Individual deletion mutants displayed the identical spindle-protrusion phenotypes. Msd1 and Wdr8 were delivered by Pkl1 to mitotic SPBs, where Pkl1 was tethered through Msd1–Wdr8. The spindle-anchoring defect imposed by msd1/wdr8/pkl1 deletions was suppressed by a mutation of the plus end–directed Cut7/kinesin-5, which was shown to be mutual. Intriguingly, Pkl1 motor activity was not required for its anchoring role once targeted to the SPB. Therefore, spindle anchoring through Msd1–Wdr8–Pkl1 is crucial for balancing the Cut7/kinesin-5–mediated outward force at the SPB. Our analysis provides mechanistic insight into the spatiotemporal regulation of two opposing kinesins to ensure mitotic spindle bipolarity.     

Dynamic Switch of Negative Feedback Regulation in Drosophila Akt–TOR Signaling

Akt represents a nodal point between the Insulin receptor and TOR signaling, and its activation by phosphorylation controls cell proliferation, cell size, and metabolism. The activity of Akt must be carefully balanced, as increased Akt signaling is frequently associated with cancer and as insufficient Akt signaling is linked to metabolic disease and diabetes mellitus. Using a genome-wide RNAi screen in Drosophila cells in culture, and in vivo analyses in the third instar wing imaginal disc, we studied the regulatory circuitries that define dAkt activation. We provide evidence that negative feedback regulation of dAkt occurs during normal Drosophila development in vivo. Whereas in cell culture dAkt is regulated by S6 Kinase (S6K)–dependent negative feedback, this feedback inhibition only plays a minor role in vivo. In contrast, dAkt activation under wild-type conditions is defined by feedback inhibition that depends on TOR Complex 1 (TORC1), but is S6K–independent. This feedback inhibition is switched from TORC1 to S6K only in the context of enhanced TORC1 activity, as triggered by mutations in tsc2. These results illustrate how the Akt–TOR pathway dynamically adapts the routing of negative feedback in response to the activity load of its signaling circuit in vivo.     

Reciprocal conversion of Gtr1 and Gtr2 nucleotide-binding states by Npr2-Npr3 inactivates TORC1 and induces autophagy

Autophagy is an intracellular degradation process that delivers cytosolic material to lysosomes and vacuoles. To investigate the mechanisms that regulate autophagy, we performed a genome-wide screen using a yeast deletion-mutant collection, and found that Npr2 and Npr3 mutants were defective in autophagy. Their mammalian homologs, NPRL2 and NPRL3, were also involved in regulation of autophagy. Npr2-Npr3 function upstream of Gtr1-Gtr2, homologs of the mammalian RRAG GTPase complex, which is crucial for TORC1 regulation. Both npr2∆ mutants and a GTP-bound Gtr1 mutant suppressed autophagy and increased Tor1 vacuole localization. Furthermore, Gtr2 binds to the TORC1 subunit Kog1. A GDP-bound Gtr1 mutant induced autophagy even under nutrient-rich conditions, and this effect was dependent on the direct binding of Gtr2 to Kog1. These results revealed that 2 molecular mechanisms, Npr2-Npr3-dependent GTP hydrolysis of Gtr1 and direct binding of Gtr2 to Kog1, are involved in TORC1 inactivation and autophagic induction.     

RagA和Nprl2在果蝇肠道发育中的调节作用关系

动物胃肠道是食物消化和营养吸收器官,对机体健康至关重要。果蝇与哺乳动物的肠道在细胞组成、遗传调控等方面高度相似,是研究肠道发育的良好模型。体外培养细胞中的研究发现,Nprl2通过作用于Rag GTPase,抑制雷帕霉素靶点复合物1(target of rapamycin complex 1,TORC1)的活性,参与细胞代谢的调节。前期报道nprl2突变果蝇具有前胃增大、消化能力降低等肠道衰老相关表型。但对于Nprl2是否通过Rag GTPase调控肠道发育等方面尚不清楚。为了探究Rag GTPase在Nprl2调控果蝇肠道发育中的作用,本研究利用遗传杂交结合免疫荧光等方法对RagA敲减和nprl2突变果蝇的肠道形态、肠道细胞组成等方面进行研究。发现单独敲减RagA可以引起肠变粗、前胃增大等表型,敲减RagA能挽救nprl2突变体中肠道变细、分泌型细胞减少的表型,但并不能挽救nprl2突变体中前胃增大的表型。以上结果表明,RagA在肠道发育中发挥重要作用,Nprl2通过作用于Rag GTPase调节肠道细胞分化和肠道形态,但Nprl2对前胃发育和肠道的消化功能的调节可能通过不依赖于Rag GTPase的机制实现。     

The Rab7 effector WDR91 promotes autophagy-lysosome degradation in neurons by regulating lysosome fusion

The effectors of the Rab7 small GTPase play multiple roles in Rab7-dependent endosome-lysosome and autophagy-lysosome pathways. However, it is largely unknown how distinct Rab7 effectors coordinate to maintain the homeostasis of late endosomes and lysosomes to ensure appropriate endolysosomal and autolysosomal degradation. Here we report that WDR91, a Rab7 effector required for early-to-late endosome conversion, is essential for lysosome function and homeostasis. Mice lacking Wdr91 specifically in the central nervous system exhibited behavioral defects and marked neuronal loss in the cerebral and cerebellar cortices. At the cellular level, WDR91 deficiency causes PtdIns3P-independent enlargement and dysfunction of lysosomes, leading to accumulation of autophagic cargoes in mouse neurons. WDR91 competes with the VPS41 subunit of the HOPS complex, another Rab7 effector, for binding to Rab7, thereby facilitating Rab7-dependent lysosome fusion in a controlled manner. WDR91 thus maintains an appropriate level of lysosome fusion to guard the normal function and survival of neurons.     

Loss of Drosophila Vps16A enhances autophagosome formation through reduced Tor activity

The HOPS tethering complex facilitates autophagosome-lysosome fusion by binding to Syx17 (Syntaxin 17), the autophagosomal SNARE. Here we show that loss of the core HOPS complex subunit Vps16A enhances autophagosome formation and slows down Drosophila development. Mechanistically, Tor kinase is less active in Vps16A mutants likely due to impaired endocytic and biosynthetic transport to the lysosome, a site of its activation. Tor reactivation by overexpression of Rheb suppresses autophagosome formation and restores growth and developmental timing in these animals. Thus, Vps16A reduces autophagosome numbers both by indirectly restricting their formation rate and by directly promoting their clearance. In contrast, the loss of Syx17 blocks autophagic flux without affecting the induction step in Drosophila.     

The TSC1/2 Complex Controls Drosophila Pigmentation through TORC1-Dependent Regulation of Catecholamine Biosynthesis

In Drosophila, the pattern of adult pigmentation is initiated during late pupal stages by the production of catecholamines DOPA and dopamine, which are converted to melanin. The pattern and degree of melanin deposition is controlled by the expression of genes such as ebony and yellow as well as by the enzymes involved in catecholamine biosynthesis. In this study, we show that the conserved TSC/TORC1 cell growth pathway controls catecholamine biosynthesis in Drosophila during pigmentation. We find that high levels of Rheb, an activator of the TORC1 complex, promote premature pigmentation in the mechanosensory bristles during pupal stages, and alter pigmentation in the cuticle of the adult fly. Disrupting either melanin synthesis by RNAi knockdown of melanogenic enzymes such as tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), or downregulating TORC1 activity by Raptor knockdown, suppresses the Rheb-dependent pigmentation phenotype in vivo. Increased Rheb activity drives pigmentation by increasing levels of TH in epidermal cells. Our findings indicate that control of pigmentation is linked to the cellular nutrient-sensing pathway by regulating levels of a critical enzyme in melanogenesis, providing further evidence that inappropriate activation of TORC1, a hallmark of the human tuberous sclerosis complex tumor syndrome disorder, can alter metabolic and differentiation pathways in unexpected ways.     

Growth control via TOR kinase signaling,an intracellular sensor of amino acid and energy availability,with crosstalk potential to proline metabolism

The TOR (Target of Rapamycin) protein kinase pathway plays a central role in sensing and responding to nutrients, stress, and intracellular energy state. TOR complex 1 (TORC1) is comprised of TOR, Raptor, and Lst8 and its activity is sensitive to inhibition by the macrolide antibiotic rapamycin. TORC1 regulates protein synthesis, ribosome biogenesis, autophagy, and ultimately cell growth through the phosphorylation of S6 K, 4E-BP, and other substrates. As TORC1 activity is positively or negatively modulated in response to upstream regulators, cellular growth rate is, respectively, enhanced or suppressed. A separate multiprotein TOR complex, TORC2, is insensitive to direct inhibition by rapamycin and does not regulate growth patterns directly; TORC2 can, however, impact certain aspects of TORC1 signaling and cell survival. TOR signaling is an ancient pathway, conserved among the yeasts, Dictyostelium, C. elegans, Drosophila, mammals, and Arabidopsis. This review will focus on the regulation of TORC1 in mammalian cells in the context of amino acid sensing/regulation and intracellular ATP homeostasis, but will also include comparisons among other organisms.     

A Role for p38 Stress-Activated Protein Kinase in Regulation of Cell Growth via TORC1

The target of rapamycin (TOR) complex 1 (TORC1) signaling pathway is a critical regulator of translation and cell growth. To identify novel components of this pathway, we performed a kinome-wide RNA interference (RNAi) screen in Drosophila melanogaster S2 cells. RNAi targeting components of the p38 stress-activated kinase cascade prevented the cell size increase elicited by depletion of the TOR negative regulator TSC2. In mammalian and Drosophila tissue culture, as well as in Drosophila ovaries ex vivo, p38-activating stresses, such as H₂O₂ and anisomycin, were able to activate TORC1. This stress-induced TORC1 activation could be blocked by RNAi against mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 3 and 6 (MKK3/6) or by the overexpression of dominant negative Rags. Interestingly, p38 was also required for the activation of TORC1 in response to amino acids and growth factors. Genetic ablation either of p38b or licorne, its upstream kinase, resulted in small flies consisting of small cells. Mutants with mutations in licorne or p38b are nutrition sensitive; low-nutrient food accentuates the small-organism phenotypes, as well as the partial lethality of the p38b null allele. These data suggest that p38 is an important positive regulator of TORC1 in both mammalian and Drosophila systems in response to certain stresses and growth factors.The target of rapamycin, TOR, is a highly conserved serine/threonine kinase that is a critical regulator of cell growth. It is a core component of two signaling complexes, TORC1 and TORC2 (60, 74). TORC1 is defined by the presence of Raptor in the complex, while TORC2 contains Rictor. Rictor and Raptor are mutually exclusive. Activation of the TORC1 pathway leads to increased protein translation, increased cell size, and increased proliferation, making this pathway an important target for emerging cancer therapies. Rapamycin is an inhibitor of TORC1 that is commonly used as an immunosuppressant following kidney transplantation (51). At least three analogs of rapamycin are currently being tested in solid and hematological tumors and have shown some promising results (21).The TORC1 pathway responds to numerous inputs, sensing both the desirability of and the capacity for growth. Many of these pathways control TORC1 signaling through phosphorylation of the tuberous sclerosis protein TSC2. TSC2 associates with TSC1 to form a heterodimeric GTPase-activating protein complex (GAP) that inactivates the small GTPase Rheb (24, 29, 67). While the exact molecular mechanism remains a topic of debate, activation of Rheb promotes the kinase activity of TORC1 (24, 29, 67). Rheb is required for the activation of TORC1 in response to both amino acids and growth factors (55, 62). In Drosophila melanogaster, mutation of either TOR or Rheb inhibits growth, leading to reduced body size and reduced cell size in mutant clones (42, 64). Mutation of either TSC1 or TSC2 has the predicted opposite effect, as tissue deficient for either of these proteins overgrows and contains large cells (49, 66).TORC1 is activated via the phosphatidylinositol 3′ kinase (PI3′K) pathway by growth-promoting mitogens, such as insulin and growth factors. Drosophila mutants with mutations of PI3′K pathway components have size phenotypes similar to those of the TOR and Rheb mutants (71). In mammalian cells, the PI3′K-mediated activation of TORC1 occurs at least in part through the phosphorylation of TSC2 by the PI3′K target AKT (30, 50). Interestingly, mutation of these residues in Drosophila has no impact on TSC2 function in vivo, suggesting that there may be other mechanisms through which PI3′K can activate Drosophila TOR (20). Recent work has suggested that the proline-rich AKT substrate PRAS40 may provide part of this link (23, 59, 69, 70). In addition, signaling through RAS activates extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and ribosomal S6 kinase (RSK), which can phosphorylate TSC2 and Raptor to activate TORC1 (13, 40, 56). There are also likely to be additional mechanisms through which growth factors activate Drosophila TOR that have not yet been identified.TORC1 activity is also controlled by the intracellular building blocks necessary to support cellular growth. The energy-sensing AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) pathway relays information about the energy status of the cell to TORC1 by phosphorylating TSC2. Unlike the inactivating phosphorylation of TSC2 by Akt, phosphorylation of TSC2 by AMPK promotes the GAP activity of the TSC complex (31). AMPK also phosphorylates Raptor, leading to decreased TORC1 activity (28). Thus, when energy levels are low, active AMPK inhibits TORC1.Amino acids also activate the TORC1 pathway, through a mechanism that requires Rheb, as well as the type III PI3′K VPS34 and the serine/threonine kinase mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase kinase 3 (MAP4K3) (11, 22, 43). TORC1 thereby integrates information about the availability of amino acids and the amount of energy available for growth with growth factor signaling. Given its ancient function in adapting growth rates to environmental conditions, it is likely that TOR responds to a variety of stimuli, suggesting that many TOR control mechanisms remain to be uncovered. The Rag family of Ras-related small GTPases has recently been identified as a key component of the amino acid-sensing pathway, acting in parallel to Rheb (34, 58). Rag GTPases form heterodimers; RagA or RagB interacts with RagC or RagD. RagA and RagB are active when GTP bound, while RagC and RagD are active when bound to GDP (34, 58). Activation of the Rags by amino acids results in TOR relocalization to Rab7-containing vesicles (58). While the function of these vesicles in TORC1 signaling remains unclear, this relocalization is associated with increased TORC1 activity.TORC1 controls cell growth and translation through the phosphorylation and activation of components of the translational machinery, such as S6 kinase (S6K) and 4EBP1, an inhibitor of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) activity (reviewed in reference 27). S6K phosphorylates the S6 ribosomal subunit, thereby increasing translation. Mice deficient for S6K1 are small and have small pancreatic beta cells and a correspondingly low level of circulating insulin (45). Mutation of the phosphorylation sites on S6 results in a similar phenotype, with small beta cells and fibroblasts (57). In Drosophila, mutation of S6K again reduces both cell and organism size (42), as does the overexpression of 4EBP (41).Interestingly, while mutation of the TORC1 pathway in mammalian cells reduces cell size by 10 to 15%, ablation of core TORC1 pathway components in Drosophila cells can affect cell size by up to 40% (73). In an attempt to identify novel components of the TORC1 pathway, we undertook an RNA interference (RNAi)-based screen of Drosophila S2 cells. We reasoned that the extreme size phenotypes observed in Drosophila cells upon TORC1 manipulations would facilitate the identification of modulators. In order to increase the likelihood of isolating novel regulators of TOR, we uncoupled TOR activity from many of its known nutritional controls by depleting TSC2 and screened for double-stranded RNAs (dsRNAs) that could reverse the cell size increase elicited by loss of TSC2. Depletion of multiple components of the p38 pathway was found to revert the TSC2 RNAi-induced cell size increase. Furthermore, activation of p38 is necessary and sufficient for the activation of TOR. Strikingly, mutation of components of the stress-activated p38 pathway in Drosophila has a similar phenotype to mutations in the TOR and insulin signaling pathway: a cell-autonomous cell size decrease, reduced body size, and a sensitization to the effects of nutritional stress.     

Differential metabolic sensitivity of insulin-like-response- and TORC1-dependent overgrowth in Drosophila fat cells

Glycolysis and fatty acid (FA) synthesis directs the production of energy-carrying molecules and building blocks necessary to support cell growth, although the absolute requirement of these metabolic pathways must be deeply investigated. Here, we used Drosophila genetics and focus on the TOR (Target of Rapamycin) signaling network that controls cell growth and homeostasis. In mammals, mTOR (mechanistic-TOR) is present in two distinct complexes, mTORC1 and mTORC2; the former directly responds to amino acids and energy levels, whereas the latter sustains insulin-like-peptide (Ilp) response. The TORC1 and Ilp signaling branches can be independently modulated in most Drosophila tissues. We show that TORC1 and Ilp-dependent overgrowth can operate independently in fat cells and that ubiquitous over-activation of TORC1 or Ilp signaling affects basal metabolism, supporting the use of Drosophila as a powerful model to study the link between growth and metabolism. We show that cell-autonomous restriction of glycolysis or FA synthesis in fat cells retrains overgrowth dependent on Ilp signaling but not TORC1 signaling. Additionally, the mutation of FASN (Fatty acid synthase) results in a drop in TORC1 but not Ilp signaling, whereas, at the cell-autonomous level, this mutation affects none of these signals in fat cells. These findings thus reveal differential metabolic sensitivity of TORC1- and Ilp-dependent growth and suggest that cell-autonomous metabolic defects might elicit local compensatory pathways. Conversely, enzyme knockdown in the whole organism results in animal death. Importantly, our study weakens the use of single inhibitors to fight mTOR-related diseases and strengthens the use of drug combination and selective tissue-targeting.     

Molecular Architecture and Function of the SEA Complex,a Modulator of the TORC1 Pathway

The TORC1 signaling pathway plays a major role in the control of cell growth and response to stress. Here we demonstrate that the SEA complex physically interacts with TORC1 and is an important regulator of its activity. During nitrogen starvation, deletions of SEA complex components lead to Tor1 kinase delocalization, defects in autophagy, and vacuolar fragmentation. TORC1 inactivation, via nitrogen deprivation or rapamycin treatment, changes cellular levels of SEA complex members. We used affinity purification and chemical cross-linking to generate the data for an integrative structure modeling approach, which produced a well-defined molecular architecture of the SEA complex and showed that the SEA complex comprises two regions that are structurally and functionally distinct. The SEA complex emerges as a platform that can coordinate both structural and enzymatic activities necessary for the effective functioning of the TORC1 pathway.The highly conserved Target of Rapamycin Complex 1 (TORC1)¹ controls eukaryotic cell growth and cellular responses to a variety of signals, including nutrients, hormones, and stresses (1, 2). In a nutrient-rich environment, TORC1 promotes anabolic processes including ribosome biogenesis and translation. Nutrient limitation or treatment with rapamycin inhibits the Tor1 kinase and initiates autophagy, a catabolic process that mediates the degradation and recycling of cytoplasmic components. However, the nutrient-sensing function of TORC1 is not fully understood, and the mechanisms of TORC1 modulation by amino acid and nitrogen availability are not yet clear.In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the TOR1 complex is composed of four subunits (Tor1, Kog1, Tco89, and Lst8) and is localized to the vacuole membrane. Amino acid levels are signaled to TORC1 (at least partially) via the EGO complex (Ragulator-Rag in mammals), which consists of Ego1, Ego3, Gtr1 (RagA/RagB), and Gtr2 (RagC/RagD) (3–6). The small GTPases Gtr1 and Gtr2 function as heterodimers and in their active form exist as the Gtr1-GTP/Gtr2-GDP complex. Amino acid sensing via the EGO complex involves the conserved vacuolar membrane protein Vam6, a member of the HOPS tethering complex. Vam6 is a GDP exchange factor that regulates the nucleotide-binding status of Gtr1 (6). At the same time, the GTP-bound state of Gtr1 is controlled by a leucyl t-RNA synthetase (7). In mammals, amino acids promote interaction of Ragulator-Rag with mTORC1 and its translocation to the lysosomal membrane (3, 4). Ragulator interacts with the v-ATPase complex at the lysosomal membrane (8), and leucyl t-RNA synthetase binds to RagD to activate mTORC1 (9).A genome-wide screen for TORC1 regulators in yeast identified two proteins, Npr2 and Npr3, as proteins that mediate amino acid starvation signal to TORC1 (10). Npr2 and Npr3 are both members of the SEA complex that we discovered recently (11–13). Besides Npr2 and Npr3, the SEA complex also contains four previously uncharacterized proteins (Sea1–Sea4) and two proteins also found in the nuclear pore complex, Seh1 and Sec13, the latter of which is additionally a component of the endoplasmic-reticulum-associated COPII coated vesicle. However, the SEA complex localizes to the vacuole membrane, and not to the nuclear pore complex or endoplasmic reticulum.The Sea proteins contain numerous structural elements present in intracellular structural trafficking complexes (11). For example, proteins Sea2–Sea4 are predicted to possess β-propeller/α-solenoid folds and contain RING domains, architectural combinations characteristic to protein complexes that form coats around membranes (e.g. coated vesicles, nuclear pore complexes) or participate in membrane tethering (e.g. HOPS, CORVET complexes). Npr2 and Npr3 possess a longin domain, found in many guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) (14–16), and Sea1/Iml1 is a GTPase activating protein (GAP) for Gtr1 (17). These structural characteristics, taken together with functional data, indicate a role for the SEA complex in intracellular trafficking, amino acid biogenesis, regulation of the TORC1 pathway, and autophagy (11–13, 17–20). A mammalian analog of the SEA complex, termed GATOR1/GATOR2, has recently been identified (21). GATORS are localized at the lysosome membrane and serve as upstream regulators of mammalian TORC1 via GATOR1 GAP activity toward RagA and RagB (21).In this study, we characterized the structural and functional organization of the yeast SEA complex. We present here a well-defined molecular architecture of the SEA complex obtained via an integrative modeling approach based on a variety of biochemical data. The structure reveals the relative positions and orientations of two SEA subcomplexes, Sea1/Npr2/Npr3 (or SEACIT (19)) and Sea2/Sea3/Sea4/Sec13/Seh1 (or SEACAT (19)), and identifies the Sea3/Sec13 dimer as a major interacting hub within the complex. We describe how the SEA complex interacts physically with TORC1 and the vacuole and is required for the relocalization of Tor1, and how every member of the Sea1/Npr2/Npr3 subcomplex is required for general autophagy.     

Role of Wdr45b in maintaining neural autophagy and cognitive function

ABSTRACT

Macroautophagy/autophagy functions as a quality control mechanism by degrading misfolded proteins and damaged organelles and plays an essential role in maintaining neural homeostasis. The phosphoinositide phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate (PtdIns3P) effector Atg18 is essential for autophagosome formation in yeast. Mammalian cells contain four Atg18 homologs, belonging to two subclasses, WIPI1 (WD repeat domain, phosphoinositide interacting 1), WIPI2 and WDR45B/WIPI3 (WD repeat domain 45B), WDR45/WIPI4. The role of Wdr45b in autophagy and in neural homeostasis, however, remains unknown. Recent human genetic studies have revealed a potential causative role of WDR45B in intellectual disability. Here we demonstrated that mice deficient in Wdr45b exhibit motor deficits and learning and memory defects. Histological analysis reveals that wdr45b knockout (KO) mice exhibit a large number of swollen axons and show cerebellar atrophy. SQSTM1- and ubiquitin-positive aggregates, which are autophagy substrates, accumulate in various brain regions in wdr45b KO mice. Double KO mice, wdr45b and wdr45, die within one day after birth and exhibit more severe autophagy defects than either of the single KO mice, suggesting that these two genes act cooperatively in autophagy. Our studies demonstrated that WDR45B is critical for neural homeostasis in mice. The wdr45b KO mice provide a model to study the pathogenesis of intellectual disability.

Abbreviations: ACSF: artificial cerebrospinal fluid; AMC: aminomethylcoumarin; BPAN: beta-propeller protein-associated neurodegeneration; CALB1: calbindin 1; CNS: central nervous system; DCN: deep cerebellar nuclei; fEPSP: field excitatory postsynaptic potential; IC: internal capsule; ID: intellectual disability; ISH: in situ hybridization; KO: knockout; LTP: long-term potentiation; MBP: myelin basic protein; MGP: medial globus pallidus; PtdIns3P: phosphoinositide phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate; WDR45B: WD repeat domain 45B; WIPI1: WD repeat domain, phosphoinositide interacting 1; WT: wild type.     

Autophagic degradation of dBruce controls DNA fragmentation in nurse cells during late Drosophila melanogaster oogenesis

Autophagy is an evolutionarily conserved pathway responsible for degradation of cytoplasmic material via the lysosome. Although autophagy has been reported to contribute to cell death, the underlying mechanisms remain largely unknown. In this study, we show that autophagy controls DNA fragmentation during late oogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. Inhibition of autophagy by genetically removing the function of the autophagy genes atg1, atg13, and vps34 resulted in late stage egg chambers that contained persisting nurse cell nuclei without fragmented DNA and attenuation of caspase-3 cleavage. The Drosophila inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP) dBruce was found to colocalize with the autophagic marker GFP-Atg8a and accumulated in autophagy mutants. Nurse cells lacking Atg1 or Vps34 in addition to dBruce contained persisting nurse cell nuclei with fragmented DNA. This indicates that autophagic degradation of dBruce controls DNA fragmentation in nurse cells. Our results reveal autophagic degradation of an IAP as a novel mechanism of triggering cell death and thereby provide a mechanistic link between autophagy and cell death.     

MAP4K3 is a component of the TORC1 signalling complex that modulates cell growth and viability in Drosophila melanogaster

Background

MAP4K3 is a conserved Ser/Thr kinase that has being found in connection with several signalling pathways, including the Imd, EGFR, TORC1 and JNK modules, in different organisms and experimental assays. We have analyzed the consequences of changing the levels of MAP4K3 expression in the development of the Drosophila wing, a convenient model system to characterize gene function during epithelial development.

Methodology and Principal Findings

Using loss-of-function mutants and over-expression conditions we find that MAP4K3 activity affects cell growth and viability in the Drosophila wing. These requirements are related to the modulation of the TORC1 and JNK signalling pathways, and are best detected when the larvae grow in a medium with low protein concentration (TORC1) or are exposed to irradiation (JNK). We also show that MAP4K3 display strong genetic interactions with different components of the InR/Tor signalling pathway, and can interact directly with the GTPases RagA and RagC and with the multi-domain kinase Tor.

Conclusions and Significance

We suggest that MAP4K3 has two independent functions during wing development, one related to the activation of the JNK pathway in response to stress and other in the assembling or activation of the TORC1 complex, being critical to modulate cellular responses to changes in nutrient availability.     

Reduction of Lobe leads to TORC1 hypoactivation that induces ectopic Jak/STAT signaling to impair Drosophila eye development

The TOR and Jak/STAT signal pathways are highly conserved from Drosophila to mammals, but it is unclear whether they interact during development. The proline-rich Akt substrate of 40 kDa (PRAS40) mediates the TOR signal pathway through regulation of TORC1 activity, but its functions in TORC1 proved in cultured cells are controversial. The Drosophila gene Lobe (L) encodes the PRAS40 ortholog required for eye cell survival. L mutants exhibit apoptosis and eye-reduction phenotypes. It is unknown whether L regulates eye development via regulation of TORC1 activity. We found that reducing the L level, by hypomorphic L mutation or heterozygosity of the null L mutation, resulted in ectopic expression of unpaired (upd), which is known to act through the Jak/STAT signal pathway to promote proliferation during eye development. Unexpectedly, when L was reduced, decreasing Jak/STAT restored the eye size, whereas increasing Jak/STAT prevented eye formation. We found that ectopic Jak/STAT signaling and apoptosis are mutually dependent in L mutants, indicating that L reduction makes Jak/STAT signaling harmful to eye development. In addition, our genetic data suggest that TORC1 signaling is downregulated upon L reduction, supporting the idea that L regulates eye development through regulation of TORC1 activity. Similar to L reduction, decreasing TORC1 signaling by dTOR overexpression results in ectopic upd expression and apoptosis. A novel finding from our data is that dysregulated TORC1 signaling regulates the expression of upd and the function of the Jak/STAT signal pathway in Drosophila eye development.     

eIF4A inactivates TORC1 in response to amino acid starvation

Amino acids regulate TOR complex 1 (TORC1) via two counteracting mechanisms, one activating and one inactivating. The presence of amino acids causes TORC1 recruitment to lysosomes where TORC1 is activated by binding Rheb. How the absence of amino acids inactivates TORC1 is less well understood. Amino acid starvation recruits the TSC1/TSC2 complex to the vicinity of TORC1 to inhibit Rheb; however, the upstream mechanisms regulating TSC2 are not known. We identify here the eIF4A‐containing eIF4F translation initiation complex as an upstream regulator of TSC2 in response to amino acid withdrawal in Drosophila. We find that TORC1 and translation preinitiation complexes bind each other. Cells lacking eIF4F components retain elevated TORC1 activity upon amino acid removal. This effect is specific for eIF4F and not a general consequence of blocked translation. This study identifies specific components of the translation machinery as important mediators of TORC1 inactivation upon amino acid removal.