A trade-off between catalytic power and substrate inhibition in TCHQ dehalogenase

Tetrachlorohydroquinone (TCHQ) dehalogenase is profoundly inhibited by its aromatic substrates, TCHQ and trichlorohydroquinone (TriCHQ). Surprisingly, mutations that change Ile12 to either Ser or Ala give an enzyme that shows no substrate inhibition. We have previously shown that TriCHQ is a noncompetitive inhibitor of the thiol-disulfide exchange reaction between glutathione and ESSG, a covalent adduct between Cys13 and glutathione formed during dehalogenation of the substrate. Substrate inhibition of the thiol-disulfide exchange reaction is less severe in the I12S and I12A mutant enzymes, primarily due to weaker binding of TriCHQ to ESSG. These mutations also result in a decrease in the rate of dehalogenation. Because the rate-limiting step in the I12S and I12A enzymes is dehalogenation, rather than the thiol-disulfide exchange reaction, the relatively modest inhibition of the thiol-disulfide exchange reaction does not affect the overall rate of turnover.     

A mechanistic investigation of the thiol-disulfide exchange step in the reductive dehalogenation catalyzed by tetrachlorohydroquinone dehalogenase

Tetrachlorohydroquinone dehalogenase catalyzes the reductive dehalogenation of tetrachloro- and trichlorohydroquinone to give 2,6-dichlorohydroquinone in the pathway for degradation of pentachlorophenol by Sphingobium chlorophenolicum. Previous work has suggested that this enzyme may have originated from a glutathione-dependent double bond isomerase such as maleylacetoacetate isomerase or maleylpyruvate isomerase. While some of the elementary steps in these two reactions may be similar, the final step in the dehalogenation reaction, a thiol-disulfide exchange reaction that removes glutathione covalently bound to Cys13, certainly has no counterpart in the isomerization reaction. The thiol-disulfide exchange reaction does not appear to have been evolutionarily optimized. There is little specificity for the thiol; many thiols react at high rates. TCHQ dehalogenase binds the glutathione involved in the thiol-disulfide exchange reaction very poorly and does not alter its pK(a) in order to improve its nucleophilicity. Remarkably, single-turnover kinetic studies show that the enzyme catalyzes this step by approximately 10000-fold. This high reactivity requires an as yet unidentified protonated group in the active site.     

Pre-steady-state kinetic studies of the reductive dehalogenation catalyzed by tetrachlorohydroquinone dehalogenase

Tetrachlorohydroquinone dehalogenase catalyzes two successive reductive dehalogenation reactions in the pathway for degradation of pentachlorophenol in the soil bacterium Sphingobium chlorophenolicum. We have used pre-steady-state kinetic methods to probe both the mechanism and the rates of elementary steps in the initial stages of the reductive dehalogenation reaction. Binding of trichlorohydroquinone (TriCHQ) to the active site is followed by rapid deprotonation to form TriCHQ-2 and subsequent formation of 3,5,6-trichloro-4-hydroxycyclohexa-2,4-dienone (TriCHQ*). Further conversion of TriCHQ* to 2,6-dichlorohydroquinone (DCHQ) proceeds only in the presence of glutathione. Conversion of TriCHQ to DCHQ during the first turnover is quite rapid, occurring at about 25 s-1 when the enzyme is saturated with TriCHQ and glutathione. The rate of subsequent turnovers is limited by the rate of the thiol-disulfide exchange reaction required to regenerate the free enzyme after turnover, a reaction that is intrinsically less difficult, but is hampered by premature binding of the aromatic substrate to the active site before the catalytic cycle is completed.     

The reaction catalyzed by tetrachlorohydroquinone dehalogenase does not involve nucleophilic aromatic substitution.

Tetrachlorohydroquinone dehalogenase catalyzes the reductive dehalogenation of tetrachlorohydroquinone and trichlorohydroquinone during the biodegradation of the xenobiotic compound pentachlorophenol by Sphingobium chlorophenolicum. The mechanism of this transformation is of interest because it is unusual and difficult, and because aerobic microorganisms rarely catalyze reductive dehalogenation reactions. Tetrachlorohydroquinone dehalogenase is a member of the glutathione S-transferase superfamily. Many enzymes in this superfamily are capable of catalyzing nucleophilic aromatic substitution reactions. On the basis of this precedent, we have considered a mechanism for tetrachlorohydroquinone dehalogenase that involves a nucleophilic aromatic substitution reaction, either via an S(N)Ar mechanism or an S(RN)1-like mechanism, in the initial part of the reaction. Mechanistic studies were carried out with the wild type enzyme and with the C13S mutant enzyme, which catalyzes only the initial steps in the reaction. Three findings eliminate the possibility of a nucleophilic aromatic substitution reaction. First, the product of such a reaction, 2,3,5-trichloro-6-S-glutathionylhydroquinone, is not a kinetically competent intermediate. Second, the enzyme can carry out the reaction when the substrate is deprotonated at the active site. Nucleophilic aromatic substitution should not be possible when the substrate is negatively charged. Third, substantial normal solvent kinetic isotope effects on k(cat) and k(cat)/K(M,TriCHQ) are observed. Nonenzymatic and enzymatic nucleophilic S(N)Ar reactions typically show inverse solvent kinetic isotope effects.     

Characterization of tetrachlorohydroquinone reductive dehalogenase from Sphingomonas sp. UG30

Tetrachlorohydroquinone reductive dehalogenase (PcpC) is the second of three enzymes that catalyze the initial degradation of pentachlorophenol in Sphingomonas sp. UG30 and several other bacterial strains. The UG30 PcpC shares a high degree (94%) of primary sequence identity with the well-studied PcpC from Sphingobium chlorophenolicum ATCC 39723. Significant differences, however, were observed between the two PcpC enzymes in some of their functional and kinetic properties. The temperature optimum of the UG30 PcpC is 10 degrees C higher and the pH optimum is approximately 2 units higher than the S. chlorophenolicum PcpC. In addition, the S. chlorophenolicum PcpC is subject to inhibition by the substrate tetrachlorohydroquinone (TCHQ), and this has necessitated the use of a mutant enzyme, which was not inhibited by TCHQ, for kinetic studies. In contrast, the UG30 PcpC was not inhibited by TCHQ and this may allow detailed kinetic and mechanistic studies using the wild-type enzyme.     

Regulation of protein function by glutathionylation

The main function of reduced glutathione (GSH) is to protect from oxidative stress as a reactive oxygen scavenger. However, in the context of redox regulation, the ratio between GSH and its oxidized form (GSSG) determines the redox state of redox-sensitive cysteines in some proteins and, thus, acts as a signaling system. While GSH/GSSG can catalyze oxido-reduction of intra- and inter-chain disulfides by thiol-disulfide exchange, this review focuses on the formation of mixed disulfides between glutathione and proteins, also known as glutathionylation. The review discusses the regulatory role of this post-translational modification and the role of protein disulfide oxidoreductases (thioredoxin/thioredoxin reductase, glutaredoxin, protein disulfide isomerase) in the reversibility of this process.     

Significance of Thiol-Disulfide Exchange in Resting Stages of Plant Development

Abstract: Desiccation tolerance is a fundamental principle for resting stages of plant development which include the dormancy of seeds and the quiescent stages of resurrection plants. To prevent the deleterious effects of cellular desiccation, a complex interplay of several adaption mechanisms is required. The ability to cope with free radicals, the formation of which is well documented in desiccated tissues, is one of these basic requirements. Detoxification of free radicals by several antioxidants and scavenging enzymes include reactions of reduced glutathione (GSH) resulting in the formation of glutathione disulfide (GSSG). In free radical processing pathways GSSG is considered to be immediately reduced back to GSH by the action of glutathione reductase (EC 1.6.4.2.). However, in desiccated tissues GSSG accumulates. Protein-glutathione mixed disulfides (PSSG) are also reported to increase in plants under drought leading to the hypothesis that glutathione protects protein thiol groups from auto-oxidation. The irreversible formation of intramolecular disulfides resulting in denaturation of proteins would be one of the primary sites of desiccation injury. We suggest that PSSG is formed by the reaction of GSSG with high molecular weight thiols and introduce a thiol-disulfide cycle that involves reduction/oxidation processes of glutathione and protein thiol groups during the dehydration/rehydration processes in desiccation tolerant tissues.     

The cysteine-rich protein thimet oligopeptidase as a model of the structural requirements for S-glutathiolation and oxidative oligomerization

Thimet oligopeptidase (EP24.15) is a cysteine-rich metallopeptidase containing fifteen Cys residues and no intra-protein disulfide bonds. Previous work on this enzyme revealed that the oxidative oligomerization of EP24.15 is triggered by S-glutathiolation at physiological GSSG levels (10-50 μM) via a mechanism based on thiol-disulfide exchange. In the present work, our aim was to identify EP24.15 Cys residues that are prone to S-glutathiolation and to determine which structural features in the cysteinyl bulk are responsible for the formation of mixed disulfides through the reaction with GSSG and, in this particular case, the Cys residues within EP24.15 that favor either S-glutathiolation or inter-protein thiol-disulfide exchange. These studies were conducted by in silico structural analyses and simulations as well as site-specific mutation. S-glutathiolation was determined by mass spectrometric analyses and western blotting with anti-glutathione antibody. The results indicated that the stabilization of a thiolate sulfhydryl and the solvent accessibility of the cysteines are necessary for S-thiolation. The Solvent Access Surface analysis of the Cys residues prone to glutathione modification showed that the S-glutathiolated Cys residues are located inside pockets where the sulfur atom comes into contact with the solvent and that the positively charged amino acids are directed toward these Cys residues. The simulation of a covalent glutathione docking onto the same Cys residues allowed for perfect glutathione posing. A mutation of the Arg residue 263 that forms a saline bridge to the Cys residue 175 significantly decreased the overall S-glutathiolation and oligomerization of EP24.15. The present results show for the first time the structural requirements for protein S-glutathiolation by GSSG and are consistent with our previous hypothesis that EP24.15 oligomerization is dependent on the electron transfer from specific protonated Cys residues of one molecule to previously S-glutathionylated Cys residues of another one.     

Modulating effect of thiol-disulfide status on [14C]aminopyrine accumulation in the isolated parietal cell

Thiol-oxidizing agents were found to stimulate [14C] aminopyrine accumulation, a reliable index of acid secretory function of isolated canine parietal cells. Glutathione is the predominant intracellular free thiol; thus, its oxidation status largely determines the thiol-disulfide status of the cell by thiol-disulfide interchange reactions. Three agents which alter glutathione oxidation status by different mechanisms were applied to parietal cells in vitro to investigate whether enhanced formation of GSSG alters acid secretory function. The agents studied were diamide (which nonenzymatically oxidizes GSH to GSSG), tert-butyl hydroperoxide (an organic peroxide specifically reduced by glutathione peroxidase, thereby generating GSSG for GSH), and 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (an inhibitor of NADPH:GSSG reductase, which presumably allows the accumulation of GSSG). Each of these agents stimulated aminopyrine accumulation in a dose-dependent fashion. Simple depletion of GSH by diethyl maleate or 2-cyclohexene-1-one did not stimulate aminopyrine accumulation. Likewise, enhanced aminopyrine accumulation occurred at diamide concentrations which did not cause significant depletion of total cellular glutathione. The thiol-reducing agent, dithiothreitol, prevented enhanced aminopyrine accumulation by 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea and tert-butyl hydroperoxide. These observations support the hypothesis that thiol-disulfide interchange reactions involving GSSG modulate the acid secretory function of the isolated parietal cell.     

Interaction of a glutathione S-conjugate with glutathione reductase. Kinetic and X-ray crystallographic studies

S-Conjugates of glutathione influence the glutathione/glutathione disulfide (GSH/GSSG) status of hepatocytes in at least two ways, namely by inhibition of GSSG transport into the bile [Akerboom et al. (1982) FEBS Lett. 140, 73-76] and by inhibition of the enzyme GSSG reductase (EC 1.6.4.2). The interaction of GSSG reductase with a well-studied conjugate, namely S-(2,4-dinitrophenyl)-glutathione and its electrophilic precursor 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene are described. For short exposures both compounds are reversible inhibitors of the enzyme, the Ki values being 30 microM and 22 microM respectively. After prolonged incubation, 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene blocks GSSG reductase irreversibly, which emphasizes the need for rapid conjugate formation in situ. As shown by X-ray crystallography the major binding site of S-(2,4-dinitrophenyl)-glutathione in GSSG reductase overlaps the binding site of the substrate, glutathione disulfide. However, the glutathione moiety of the conjugate does not bind in the same manner as either of the glutathiones in the disulfide.     

S-glutathionylation in human platelets by a thiol-disulfide exchange-independent mechanism

Protein-glutathione mixed disulfide formation was investigated in vitro by exposure of human platelets to the thiol-specific oxidant azodicarboxylic acid-bis-dimethylamide (diamide). We found that diamide causes a decrease in the reduced form of glutathione (GSH), paralleled by an increase in protein-GSH mixed disulfides (S-glutathionylated proteins), which was not accompanied by any significant increase in the basal level of glutathione disulfide (GSSG). The increase in the appearance of S-glutathionylated proteins was inversely correlated with ADP-induced platelet aggregation. Platelet cytoskeleton was analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by Western immunoblotting with anti-GSH antibody. The main S-glutathionylated cytoskeletal protein proved to be actin, which accounts for 35% of the platelet total protein content. Our results suggest that neither GSSG formation nor a consequent thiol-disulfide exchange mechanism is involved in actin S-glutathionylation of human platelets exposed to diamide. Instead, a mechanism involving the initial oxidative activation of actin thiol groups, which then react with GSH to the protein-GSH mixed disulfides, makes it likely that platelet actin is S-glutathionylated without any significant increase in the GSSG content.     

Recruitment of a double bond isomerase to serve as a reductive dehalogenase during biodegradation of pentachlorophenol

Tetrachlorohydroquinone dehalogenase catalyzes the replacement of chlorine atoms on tetrachlorohydroquinone and trichlorohydroquinone with hydrogen atoms during the biodegradation of pentachlorophenol by Sphingomonas chlorophenolica. The sequence of the active site region of tetrachlorohydroquinone dehalogenase is very similar to those of the corresponding regions of maleylacetoacetate isomerases, enzymes that catalyze the glutathione-dependent isomerization of a cis double bond in maleylacetoacetate to the trans configuration during the catabolism of phenylalanine and tyrosine. Furthermore, tetrachlorohydroquinone dehalogenase catalyzes the isomerization of maleylacetone (an analogue of maleylacetoacetate) at a rate nearly comparable to that of a bona fide bacterial maleylacetoacetate isomerase. Since maleylacetoacetate isomerase is involved in a common and presumably ancient pathway for catabolism of tyrosine, while tetrachlorohydroquinone dehalogenase catalyzes a more specialized reaction, it is likely that tetrachlorohydroquinone dehalogenase arose from a maleylacetoacetate isomerase. The substrates and overall transformations involved in the dehalogenation and isomerization reactions are strikingly different. This enzyme provides a remarkable example of Nature's ability to recruit an enzyme with a useful structural scaffold and elaborate upon its basic catalytic capabilities to generate a catalyst for a newly needed reaction.     

GSTB1-1 from Proteus mirabilis: a snapshot of an enzyme in the evolutionary pathway from a redox enzyme to a conjugating enzyme

The native form of the bacterial glutathione transferase B1-1 (EC ) is characterized by one glutathione (GSH) molecule covalently linked to Cys-10. This peculiar disulfide, only found in the Beta and Omega class glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) but absent in all other GSTs, prompts questions about its role and how GSH can be activated and utilized in the reaction normally performed by GSTs. Stopped-flow and spectroscopic experiments suggest that, in the native enzyme (GSTB1-1ox), a second GSH molecule is present, albeit transiently, in the active site. This second GSH binds to the enzyme through a bimolecular interaction followed by a fast thiol-disulfide exchange with the covalently bound GSH. The apparent pK(a) of the non-covalently bound GSH is lowered from 9.0 to 6.4 +/- 0.2 in similar fashion to other GSTs. The reduced form of GSTB1-1 (GSTB1-1red) binds GSH 100-fold faster and also induces a more active deprotonation of the substrate with an apparent pK(a) of 5.2 +/- 0.1. Apparently, the absence of the mixed disulfide does not affect k(cat) and K(m) values in the GST conjugation activity, which is rate-limited by the chemical step both in GSTB1-1red and in GSTB1-1ox. However, GSTB1-1ox follows a steady-state random sequential mechanism whereas a rapid-equilibrium random sequential mechanism is adopted by GSTB1-1red. Remarkably, GSTB1-1ox and GSTB1-1red are equally able to catalyze a glutaredoxin-like catalysis using cysteine S-sulfate and hydroxyethyl disulfide as substrates. Cys-10 is an essential residue in this redox activity, and its replacement by alanine abolishes this enzymatic activity completely. It appears that GSTB1-1 behaves like an "intermediate enzyme" between the thiol-disulfide oxidoreductase and the GST superfamilies.     

Interaction of menadione (2-methyl-1,4-naphthoquinone) with glutathione

The interaction of menadione with reduced glutathione (GSH) led to a removal of menadione and formation of menadione-GSH conjugate and glutathione disulfide (GSSG). The changes in thiol level were essentially biphasic with an initial rapid decrease in GSH and appearance of GSSG (less than 1 min) followed by secondary less pronounced changes. The interaction of menadione and GSH caused an oxygen uptake and both superoxide anion radical and hydrogen peroxide were produced during the reaction, the amount dependent on the GSH/menadione ratio. Catalase did not protect against the initial decrease in GSH level but markedly inhibited the secondary changes while superoxide dismutase had little effect. These results suggest that the initial changes in thiol level are the result in part of a redox reaction between menadione and GSH as well as conjugate formation, whilst the secondary changes reflect conjugate formation and the activity of other oxidants such as hydrogen peroxide. The potential biological significance of this reaction was investigated using hepatocytes depleted of reduced pyridine nucleotides and thus not able to perform enzyme-catalyzed reduction of menadione. In these cells menadione induced GSSG formation at a rate similar to that observed in control cells. This suggests that quinone-induced oxidative challenge caused by the chemical interactions of a quinone and glutathione may have biological relevance.     

Regulation of the pentose phosphate cycle

1. A search was made for mechanisms which may exert a ;fine' control of the glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase reaction in rat liver, the rate-limiting step of the oxidative pentose phosphate cycle. 2. The glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase reaction is expected to go virtually to completion because the primary product (6-phosphogluconate lactone) is rapidly hydrolysed and the equilibrium of the joint dehydrogenase and lactonase reactions is in favour of virtually complete formation of phosphogluconate. However, the reaction does not go to completion, because glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase is inhibited by NADPH (Neglein & Haas, 1935). 3. Measurements of the inhibition (which is competitive with NADP(+)) show that at physiological concentrations of free NADP(+) and free NADPH the enzyme is almost completely inhibited. This indicates that the regulation of the enzyme activity is a matter of de-inhibition. 4. Among over 100 cell constituents tested only GSSG and AMP counteracted the inhibition by NADPH; only GSSG was highly effective at concentrations that may be taken to occur physiologically. 5. The effect of GSSG was not due to the GSSG reductase activity of liver extracts, because under the test conditions the activity of this enzyme was very weak, and complete inhibition of the reductase by Zn(2+) did not abolish the GSSG effect. 6. Preincubation of the enzyme preparation with GSSG in the presence of Mg(2+) and NADP(+) before the addition of glucose 6-phosphate and NADPH much increased the GSSG effect. 7. Dialysis of liver extracts and purification of glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase abolished the GSSG effect, indicating the participation of a cofactor in the action of GSSG. 8. The cofactor removed by dialysis or purification is very unstable. The cofactor could be separated from glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase by ultrafiltration of liver homogenates. Some properties of the cofactor are described. 9. The hypothesis that GSSG exerts a fine control of the pentose phosphate cycle by counteracting the NADPH inhibition of glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase is discussed.     

The ATP-grasp enzymes

The ATP-grasp enzymes consist of a superfamily of 21 proteins that contain an atypical ATP-binding site, called the ATP-grasp fold. The ATP-grasp fold is comprised of two α+β domains that "grasp" a molecule of ATP between them and members of the family typically have an overall structural design containing three common conserved focal domains. The founding members of the family consist of biotin carboxylase, d-ala-d-ala ligase and glutathione synthetase, all of which catalyze the ATP-assisted reaction of a carboxylic acid with a nucleophile via the formation of an acylphosphate intermediate. While most members of the superfamily follow this mechanistic pathway, studies have demonstrated that two enzymes catalyze only the phosphoryl transfer step and thus are kinases instead of ligases. Members of the ATP-grasp superfamily are found in several metabolic pathways including de novo purine biosynthesis, gluconeogenesis, and fatty acid synthesis. Given the critical nature of these enzymes, researchers have actively sought the development of potent inhibitors of several members of the superfamily as antibacterial and anti-obseity agents. In this review, we will discuss the structure, function, mechanism, and inhibition of the ATP-grasp enzymes.     

Properties and physiological function of a glutathione reductase purified from spinach leaves by affinity chromatography

Glutathione reductase (EC 1.6.4.2) was purified from spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) leaves by affinity chromatography on ADP-Sepharose. The purified enzyme has a specific activity of 246 enzyme units/mg protein and is homogeneous by the criterion of polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis on native and SDS-gels. The enzyme has a molecular weight of 145,000 and consists of two subunits of similar size. The pH optimum of spinach glutathione reductase is 8.5–9.0, which is related to the function it performs in the chloroplast stroma. It is specific for oxidised glutathione (GSSG) but shows a low activity with NADH as electron donor. The pH optimum for NADH-dependent GSSG reduction is lower than that for NADPH-dependent reduction. The enzyme has a low affinity for reduced glutathione (GSH) and for NADP⁺, but GSH-dependent NADP⁺ reduction is stimulated by addition of dithiothreitol. Spinach glutathione reductase is inhibited on incubation with reagents that react with thiol groups, or with heavymetal ions such as Zn²⁺. GSSG protects the enzyme against inhibition but NADPH does not. Pre-incubation of the enzyme with NADPH decreases its activity, so kinetic studies were performed in which the reaction was initiated by adding NADPH or enzyme. The Km for GSSG was approximately 200 M and that for NADPH was about 3 M. NADP⁺ inhibited the enzyme, assayed in the direction of GSSG reduction, competitively with respect to NADPH and non-competitively with respect to GSSG. In contrast, GSH inhibited non-competitively with respect to both NADPH and GSSG. Illuminated chloroplasts, or chloroplasts kept in the dark, contain equal activities of glutathione reductase. The kinetic properties of the enzyme (listed above) suggest that GSH/GSSG ratios in chloroplasts will be very high under both light and dark conditions. This prediction was confirmed experimentally. GSH or GSSG play no part in the light-induced activation of chloroplast fructose diphosphatase or NADP⁺-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. We suggest that GSH helps to stabilise chloroplast enzymes and may also play a role in removing H₂O₂. Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity may be required in chloroplasts in the dark in order to provide NADPH for glutathione reductase.Abbreviations GSH reduced form of the tripeptide glutathione - GSSG oxidised form of glutathione     

Thiol/disulfide redox equilibrium and kinetic behavior of chicken liver fatty acid synthase

Chicken liver fatty acid synthase is rapidly inactivated and cross-linked at pH 7.2 and 8.0 by incubation with low concentrations of common biological disulfides including glutathione disulfide, coenzyme A disulfide, and glutathione-coenzyme A-mixed disulfide. Glutathione disulfide inactivation of the enzyme is accompanied by the oxidation of a total of 4-5 enzyme thiols per monomer. Only one glutathione equivalent is incorporated per monomer as a protein-mixed disulfide, and its rate of incorporation is significantly slower than the rate of inactivation. The formation of protein-SS-protein disulfides results in significant cross-linking of enzyme subunits. The inactive enzyme is rapidly and completely reactivated, and the cross-linking is completely reversed by incubation of the enzyme with thiols (10-20 mM) including dithiothreitol, mercaptoethanol, and glutathione. In a glutathione redox buffer (GSH + GSSG), disulfide bond formation comes to equilibrium. The enzyme activity at equilibrium is dependent both on the ratio of glutathione to glutathione disulfide and on the total glutathione concentration. The equilibrium constant for the redox equilibration of fatty acid synthase in a glutathione redox buffer is 15 mM (Ered + GSSG in equilibrium Eox + 2GSH). The formation of at least one protein-protein disulfide per monomer dominates the redox properties of the enzyme while the formation of one protein-mixed disulfide with glutathione (Kmixed = 0.45) has little effect on activity. The oxidation equilibrium constant suggests that there would be no significant cycling between the reduced and the oxidized enzyme in response to likely physiological variations in the hepatic glutathione status. The possibility that changes in the concentration of cellular glutathione may act as a mechanism for metabolic control of other enzymes is discussed.     

Modulation of rat liver S-adenosylmethionine synthetase activity by glutathione.

Rat liver S-adenosylmethionine (AdoMet) synthetase appears as high-M(r) (tetramer) and low-M(r) (dimer) forms. Both are inhibited in the presence of GSSG at pH 8. The calculated Ki values are 2.14 and 4.03 mM for the high- and low-M(r) forms, respectively. No effect on enzyme activity was observed in the presence of GSH, but modulation of inhibition by GSSG can be obtained by addition of GSH. At a total glutathione concentration (GSH + GSSG) of 10 mM, a KOX of 1.74 was calculated for the high-M(r) form, whereas this constant was 2.85 for the low-M(r) AdoMet synthetase. No incorporation of [35S]GSSG was observed in either of the enzyme forms, and inhibition of enzyme activity was correlated with dissociation of both AdoMet synthetases to a monomer. The data obtained in the presence of GSSG seem to suggest that oxidation leads to the formation of an intrasubunit disulfide. The possible regulation of AdoMet synthetase activity by the GSH/GSSG ratio is discussed, as well as its in vivo significance.     

Glutathione oxidase activity of selenocystamine: a mechanistic study.

Selenocystamine (RSe-SeR) was shown to catalyze the oxygen-mediated oxidation of excess GSH to glutathione disulfide, at neutral pH and ambient PO2. This glutathione oxidase activity required the heterolytic reduction of the diselenide bond, which produced two equivalents of the selenolate derivative selenocysteamine (RSe-), via the transient formation of a selenenylsulfide intermediate (RSe-SG). Formation of RSe- was the only reaction observed in anaerobic conditions. At ambient PO2, the kinetics and stoichiometry of GSSG production as well as that of GSH and oxygen consumptions demonstrated that RSe- performed a three-step reduction of oxygen to water. The first step was a one-electron transfer from RSe- to dioxygen, yielding superoxide and a putative selenyl radical RSe., which decayed very rapidly to RSe-SeR. In the second step, RSe- reduced superoxide to hydrogen peroxide through a much faster one-electron transfer, also associated with the decay of RSe. to RSe-SeR. The third step was a two-electron transfer from RSe- to hydrogen peroxide, again much faster than oxygen reduction, which resulted in the production of RSe-SG, presumably via a selenenic acid intermediate (RSeOH) which was trapped by excess GSH. This third step was studied on exogenous hydroperoxide in anaerobic conditions, and it could be eliminated from the glutathione oxidase cycle in the presence of excess catalase. The role of RSe- as a one- and two-electron reductant was confirmed by competitive carboxymethylation with iodoacetate. RSe- was able to rapidly reduce ferric cytochrome c to its ferrous derivative. The overall rate of catalytic glutathione oxidation was GSH concentration dependent and oxygen concentration independent. Excess glutathione reductase and NADPH increased the catalytic oxidation of GSH, probably by switching the rate-limiting step from selenylsulfide to diselenide cleavage. When GSH was substituted for dithiothreitol, it was shown to reduce RSe-SeR to RSe- in a fast and quantitative reaction, and selenocystamine behaved as a dithiothreitol oxidase, whose catalytic cycle was dependent on oxygen concentration. The oxidase cycle of glutathione was inhibited by mercaptosuccinate, while that of dithiothreitol was not affected. When mercaptosuccinate was substituted for GSH, a stable selenenylsulfide was formed. These observations suggest that electrostatic interactions affect the reductive cleavage of diselenide and selenenylsulfide linkages. This study illustrates the ease of one-electron transfers from RSe- to a variety of reducible substrates. Such free radical mechanisms may explain much of the cytotoxicity of alkylselenols, and they demonstrate that selenocystamine is a poor catalytic model of the enzyme glutathione peroxidase.