Femtosecond nuclear oscillations under charge separation in reaction centers of photosynthesis

Results are presented of a study of primary processes of formation of the charge separated states P⁺B_A ^- and P⁺H_A ^- (where P is the primary electron donor, B_A and H_A the primary and secondary electron acceptors) in native and pheophytin-modified reaction centers (RCs) of Rhodobacter sphaeroides R-26 by methods of femtosecond spectroscopy of absorption changes at low temperature. Coherent oscillations were studied in the kinetics at 935 nm (P* stimulated emission band), at 1020 nm (B_A ^- absorption band), and at 760 nm (H_A absorption band). It was found that when the wavepacket created under femtosecond light excitation approaches the intersection between P* and P⁺B_A ^- potential surfaces at 120- and 380-fsec delays, the formation of two electron states emitting light at 935 nm (P*) and absorbing light at 1020 nm (P⁺B_A ^-) takes place. At the later time the wavepacket motion has a frequency of 32 cm^-1 and is accompanied by electron transfer from P* to B_A in pheophytin-modified and native RCs and further to H_A in native RCs. It was shown that electron transfer processes monitored by the 1020-nm absorption band development as well as by bleaching of 760-nm absorption band have the enhanced 32 cm^-1 mode in the Fourier transform spectra.     

Mechanism of charge separation and their stabilization in bacterial reaction centers

The nuclear wavepacket formed by 20-fs excitation on the P* potential energy surface in native and mutant (YM210W and YM210L) reaction centers of Rhodobacter (Rb.) sphaeroides and Chloroflexus (C.) aurantiacus RCs was found to be reversibly transferred to the P+BA- surface at 120, 380, and 640-fs delays (monitored by measurements of BA- absorption at 1020-1028 nm). The reaction centers of YM210W(L) mutant show the most simple pattern of fs oscillations with a period of 230 fs in stimulated emission from P* and in the product P+BA-. The mechanisms of the electron transfer pathway between P* and BA and of the stabilization of the state P+BA- in bacterial reaction centers are discussed.     

Coupling of nuclear wavepacket motion and charge separation in bacterial reaction centers

The mechanism of the charge separation and stabilization of separated charges was studied using the femtosecond absorption spectroscopy. It was found that nuclear wavepacket motions on potential energy surface of the excited state of the primary electron donor P* leads to a coherent formation of the charge separated states P⁺B_A⁻, P⁺H_A⁻ and P⁺H_B⁻ (where B_A, H_B and H_A are the primary and secondary electron acceptors, respectively) in native, pheophytin-modified and mutant reaction centers (RCs) of Rhodobacter sphaeroides R-26 and in Chloroflexus aurantiacus RCs. The processes were studied by measurements of coherent oscillations in kinetics at 890 and 935 nm (the stimulated emission bands of P*), at 800 nm (the absorption band of B_A) and at 1020 nm (the absorption band of B_A⁻) as well as at 760 nm (the absorption band of H_A) and at 750 nm (the absorption band of H_B). It was found that wavepacket motion on the 130–150 cm⁻¹ potential surface of P* is accompanied by approaches to the intercrossing region between P* and P⁺B_A⁻ surfaces at 120 and 380 fs delays emitting light at 935 nm (P*) and absorbing light at 1020 nm (P⁺B_A⁻). In the presence of Tyr M210 (Rb. sphaeroides) or M195 (C. aurantiacus) the stabilization of P⁺B_A⁻ is observed within a few picosseconds in contrast to YM210W. At even earlier delay (40 fs) the emission at 895 nm and bleaching at 748 nm are observed in C. aurantiacus RCs showing the wavepacket approach to the intercrossing between the P* and P⁺H_B⁻ surfaces at that time. The 32 cm⁻¹ rotation mode of HOH was found to modulate the electron transfer rate probably due to including of this molecule in polar chain connecting P_B and B_A and participating in the charge separation. The mechanism of the charge separation and stabilization of separated charges is discussed in terms of the role of nuclear motions, of polar groups connecting P and acceptors and of proton of OH group of TyrM210.     

Nuclear wavepacket motion producing a reversible charge separation in bacterial reaction centers

The excitation of bacterial reaction centers (RCs) at 870 nm by 30 fs pulses induces the nuclear wavepacket motions on the potential energy surface of the primary electron donor excited state P*, which lead to the fs oscillations in stimulated emission from P* [M.H. Vos, M.R. Jones, C.N. Hunter, J. Breton, J.-C. Lambry and J.-L. Martin (1994) Biochemistry 33, 6750-6757] and in Qy absorption band of the primary electron acceptor, bacteriochlorophyll monomer B(A) [A.M. Streltsov, S.I.E. Vulto, A.Y. Shkuropatov, A.J. Hoff, T.J. Aartsma and V.A. Shuvalov (1998) J. Phys. Chem. B 102, 7293-7298] with a set of fundamental frequencies in the range of 10-300 cm(-1). We have found that in pheophytin-modified RCs, the fs oscillations with frequency around 130 cm(-1) observed in the P*-stimulated emission as well as in the B(A) absorption band at 800 nm are accompanied by remarkable and reversible formation of the 1020 nm absorption band which is characteristic of the radical anion band of bacteriochlorophyll monomer B(A)-. These results are discussed in terms of a reversible electron transfer between P* and B(A) induced by a motion of the wavepacket near the intersection of potential energy surfaces of P* and P+B(A)-, when a maximal value of the Franck-Condon factor is created.     

Energy transfer in bacterial photosynthesis

Four possible explanations are offered to account for low fluorescence increase observed for purple bacteria under transition from active to inhibited photosynthesis. The increase observed is inconsistent with high (1.0) yield of primary photosynthetic process of P₈₉₀ photooxidation. The dependences of fluorescence yield and lifetime on the portion of active reaction centres have been analysed for each case. Experimental investigation carried out favours the existence of background fluorescence together with fluorescence, whose quantum yield correlates with the reaction centre functional state. The important conclusion is made that lifetime of photosynthetic fluorescence is much lower than 1 nsec and energy is transferred to the reaction centres by a mechanism other than inductive-resonance.     

The polarization model in bacterial photosynthesis

The widely accepted model of reaction center /RC/ functioning is proved to come into contradiction with some recent data. In particular, it cannot explain why only a minor part of electronic excitations (approximately 10%) escapes from excited RC special pairs back to antenna BChls. Therefore we believe that the model must be substantially modernized. In 1981 we developed a new model/1,2/. We suggested a femtosecond state to precede primary e-transfer reaction due to reorientation of water molecule dipole in the electric field of excited RC dimer. This mechanism is responsible for energy trapping before the primary e-transport occurs. During last years his mechanism got support from various experimental works. Now this polarization model claims to fit all reliable experimental data at least in bacterial photosynthesis.     

Phase separation,charge separation and biogenesis

The current view of bioenergetics postulates transmembrane charge separation as a primary mechanism of energy storage and transformation. Using that bioenergetic view we examine possible methods of photon driven transduction in primordial vesicles. Two possible types of proton pumps are analyzed and a method of anaerobic photophosphorylation is discussed. Using these principles we theorize about the formation of prebiotic photochemical vesicles utilizing the same transmembrane energy conversions characteristic of contemporary cellular systems.     

How carotenoids protect bacterial photosynthesis

The essential function of carotenoids in photosynthesis is to act as photoprotective agents, preventing chlorophylls and bacteriochlorophylls from sensitizing harmful photodestructive reactions in the presence of oxygen. Based upon recent structural studies on reaction centres and antenna complexes from purple photosynthetic bacteria, the detailed organization of the carotenoids is described. Then with specific reference to bacterial antenna complexes the details of the photoprotective role, triplet triplet energy transfer, are presented.     

Primary charge separation in Photosystem II

In this Minireview, we discuss a number of issues on the primary photosynthetic reactions of the green plant Photosystem II. We discuss the origin of the 683 and 679 nm absorption bands of the PS II RC complex and suggest that these forms may reflect the single-site spectrum with dominant contributions from the zero-phonon line and a pronounced ∼80 cm⁻¹ phonon side band, respectively. The couplings between the six central RC chlorins are probably very similar and, therefore, a `multimer' model arises in which there is no `special pair' and in which for each realization of the disorder the excitation may be dynamically localized on basically any combination of neighbouring chlorins. The key features of our model for the primary reactions in PS II include ultrafast (<500 fs) energy transfer processes within the multimer, `slow' (∼20 ps) energy transfer processes from peripheral RC chlorophylls to the RC multimer, ultrafast charge separation (<500 fs) with a low yield starting from the singlet-excited `accessory' chlorophyll of the active branch, cation transfer from this `accessory' chlorophyll to a `special pair' chlorophyll and/or charge separation starting from this `special pair' chlorophyll (∼8 ps), and slow relaxation (∼50 ps) of the radical pair by conformational changes of the protein. The charge separation in the PS II RC can probably not be described as a simple trap-limited or diffusion-limited process, while for the PS II core and larger complexes the transfer of the excitation energy to the PS II RC may be rate limiting. This revised version was published online in June 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Electrostatic control of phospholipid polymorphism

A regular progression of polymorphic phase behavior was observed for mixtures of the anionic phospholipid, cardiolipin, and the cationic phospholipid derivative, 1, 2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-ethylphosphocholine. As revealed by freeze-fracture electron microscopy and small-angle x-ray diffraction, whereas the two lipids separately assume only lamellar phases, their mixtures exhibit a symmetrical (depending on charge ratio and not polarity) sequence of nonlamellar phases. The inverted hexagonal phase, H(II,) formed from equimolar mixtures of the two lipids, i.e., at net charge neutrality (charge ratio (CR((+/-))) = 1:1). When one type of lipid was in significant excess (CR((+/-)) = 2:1 or CR((+/-)) = 1:2), a bicontinuous cubic structure was observed. These cubic phases were very similar to those sometimes present in cellular organelles that contain cardiolipin. Increasing the excess of cationic or anionic charge to CR((+/-)) = 4:1 or CR((+/-)) = 1:4 led to the appearance of membrane bilayers with numerous interlamellar contacts, i.e., sponge structures. It is evident that interactions between cationic and anionic moieties can influence the packing of polar heads and hence control polymorphic phase transitions. The facile isothermal, polymorphic interconversion of these lipids may have important biological and technical implications.     

B-side charge separation in bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers: nanosecond time scale electron transfer from HB- to QB

We report time-resolved optical measurements of the primary electron transfer reactions in Rhodobacter capsulatus reaction centers (RCs) having four mutations: Phe(L181) --> Tyr, Tyr(M208) --> Phe, Leu(M212) --> His, and Trp(M250) --> Val (denoted YFHV). Following direct excitation of the bacteriochlorophyll dimer (P) to its lowest excited singlet state P, electron transfer to the B-side bacteriopheophytin (H(B)) gives P(+)H(B)(-) in approximately 30% yield. When the secondary quinone (Q(B)) site is fully occupied, P(+)H(B)(-) decays with a time constant estimated to be in the range of 1.5-3 ns. In the presence of excess terbutryn, a competitive inhibitor of Q(B) binding, the observed lifetime of P(+)H(B)(-) is noticeably longer and is estimated to be in the range of 4-8 ns. On the basis of these values, the rate constant for P(+)H(B)(-) --> P(+)Q(B)(-) electron transfer is calculated to be between approximately (2 ns)(-)(1) and approximately (12 ns)(-)(1), making it at least an order of magnitude smaller than the rate constant of approximately (200 ps)(-)(1) for electron transfer between the corresponding A-side cofactors (P(+)H(A)(-) --> P(+)Q(A)(-)). Structural and energetic factors associated with electron transfer to Q(B) compared to Q(A) are discussed. Comparison of the P(+)H(B)(-) lifetimes in the presence and absence of terbutryn indicates that the ultimate (i.e., quantum) yield of P(+)Q(B)(-) formation relative to P is 10-25% in the YFHV RC.     

Energy transfer to the reaction centres in bacterial photosynthesis

From a combined study of (1) bacteriochlorophyll fluorescence lifetimes, (2) relative yields and (3) differential absorption changes corresponding to the reaction centres photooxidation, the absolute values of fluorescence lifetimes and quantum yields for two bacteriochlorophyll fractions have been calculated. The main bacteriochlorophyll fraction (80–90%) serving as a light-gathering antenna for reaction centresP ₈₉₀ is characterized by dark values of fluorescence lifetimes of the order of 10^–11 sec and fluorescence yields of 10^–3. The remaining part of the bulk pigment, not associated withP ₈₉₀ as far as excitation energy transfer is concerned, has an approximately constant fluorescence yield of about 5–8% and lifetime of about 10^–9 sec. Basing on these results, excitation jump times and intermolecular coupling energies were estimated to be 10^–13 sec and 10^–2 ev respectively. The conclusion is made that excitation energy transfer in the main part of bacteriochlorophyll occurs by the exciton mechanism at moderate intermolecular energies.     

Electrostatic effects in proteins: comparison of dielectric and charge models.

Two approaches for calculating electrostatic effects in proteins are compared and ana analysis is presented of the dependence of calculated properties on the model used to define the charge distribution. Changes in electrostatic free energy have been calculated using a screened Coulomb potential (SCP) with a distance-dependent effective dielectric permittivity to model bulk solvent effects and a finite difference approach to solve the Poisson-Boltzmann (FDPB) equation. The properties calculated include shifts in dissociation constants of ionizable groups, the effect of annihilating surface charges on the binding of metals, and shifts in redox potentials due to changes in the charge of ionizable groups. In the proteins considered the charged sites are separated by 3.5-12 A. It is shown that for the systems studied in this distance range the SCP yields calculated values which are at least as accurate as those obtained from solution of the FDPB equation. In addition, in the distance range 3-5 A the SCP gives substantially better results than the FDPB equation. Possible sources of this difference between the two methods are discussed. Shifts in binding constants and redox potentials were calculated with several standard charge sets, and the resulting values show a variation of 20-40% between the 'best' and 'worst' cases. From this study it is concluded that in most applications, changes in electrostatic free energies can be calculated economically and reliably using an SCP approach with a single functional form of the screening function.