Proteins of metaphase chromosomes and interphase chromatin.

Metaphase chromosomal and interphase chromatin proteins from cells of two species have been compared by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Consistent, common changes in the quantitative distribution of the nonhistone chromosomal proteins are observed in both species. Proteins of ca. 65,000 and 68,000 MW are enriched in interphase chromatin while proteins of ca. 50,000 and 200,000 are more prominent components of metaphase chromosomes. A group of proteins of 90,000-100,000 are also increased in metaphase chromosomes compared to interphase chromatin. By two dimensional gel analysis, the most abundant proteins from chromosomes of both cell types are similar, suggesting a structural role for these nonhistone proteins (1).     

Neutron diffraction of chromatin in interphase nuclei and metaphase chromosomes

We have used neutron diffraction to study chromatin structure in interphase nuclei and metaphase chromosomes as a function of decreasing ion concentration. Aliquots of a suspension of rat liver nuclei prepared in a polyamine-free buffer were washed in buffers of 1/3, 1/6 and 1/12 if the original concentration of monovalent and divalent cations (40 mM KCl; 20 mM NaCl; 1.2 mM MgCl2). After the first dilution step (1/1 to 1/3), only small changes occurred in the diffraction pattern. They can be interpreted by a loosening of the original structure, i.e. by the formation of isolated buffer-filled spaces with an overall size of the order of 35-45 nm. Drastic changes in the diffraction pattern were observed, however, when the nuclei were washed in the more diluted buffers (1/6 and 1/12). The profiles of the distances distribution functions indicate the formation of supranucleosomal particles with an overall diameter of 40-50 nm. The compact chromatin structure disassembled directly into these fundamental structural units. Structural transformations in the Chinese hamster ovary metaphase chromosomes were induced by diminishing the Ca2+ ion concentration of the buffer from originally 3.0 mM to 0.3 mM and/or by increasing the pH value of the buffer from originally 7.0 up to 8.0. The neutron diffraction patterns remained essentially unchanged during these treatments, i.e. the decondensation of the chromosomes as observed in the light microscope is not accompanied by disassembly at the ultrastructural level between 2 nm and 150 nm.     

Random arrangement of chromosomes in a radial metaphase configuration

During metaphase II of spermatogenesis the chromosomes of the grasshopper, Melanoplus femurrubrum (De Geer), are arranged at the periphery of the metaphase plate in what has been termed the radial metaphyse configuration. Cells at this stage contain two long, three short, and either six or seven chromosomes of medium length. The arrangement of the chromosomes in the metaphase plate was analyzed by counting the number of medium-sized chromosomes which separated the two long chromosomes. In the 351 cells analyzed the frequencies of cells with the various types of arrangements agreed closely with those expected from a random arrangement of the chromosomes in the metaphase plate. The possible role of chromosome-to-chromosome connectives in the arrangement of the chromosomes in the radial configuration is discussed.Supported by Grant GB 23665 from the National Science Foundation Washington, D.C.     

Ultrastructure of the centrometric regions of mouse chromosomes in metaphase chromosomes and interphase nuclei]

The chromatin ultrastructure was studied in the centromeric region of mitotic chromosomes and in interphase nuclei of mouse cells after differential staining on C-band. A new method is suggested to study centromeric region of chromosomes treated by the Giemsa banding technique. Fibers of chromosomes appeared to be packed denser in the centromeric regions of mitotic chromosomes than in arms. The disposition of chromatin fibers in the centromeric chromocentres of interphase nuclei is the same as in the centromeric regions of mitotic chromosomes.     

Quantitative studies on the arrangement of human metaphase chromosomes

Summary The association pattern was studied in 2715 mitoses of 90 meningiomas with different numbers of acrocentric chromosomes. In cells with monosomy 22, a significant increase of mitoses with associations was observed in comparison to cells with a normal karyotype. The number of associating acrocentric chromosomes was highly significantly increased. This surplus was not only caused by a highly significant increase of associating G chromosomes but also of D chromosomes. The loss of further acrocentric chromosomes had no significant influence on the number of mitoses with associations or the number of associating chromosomes. Based on the well-known correlations between the nucleolus organization and the association pattern, the results seem to indicate a compensation mechanism among the nucleoles organizing regions (NOR's) which keeps the supply of nucleolar material constant and simultaneously causes a higher association tendency between the remaining acrocentric chromosomes. The increase of associations in the 22 monosomic cells was interpreted as a overcompensation after the loss of only one NOR.     

Quantitative studies on the arrangement of human metaphase chromosomes

Summary The association pattern was studied in 1182 mitoses of 21 patients with trisomy 13 and in a control group. In addition, 173 trisomic mitoses were compared with the same number of diploid mitoses in a case of mosaicism.The number of mitoses with associations was no higher in the trisomic cells than in cells with normal karyotypes. Some differences were observed in the frequency of associations per cell and of the types of associations in the patient group and in the trisomic cells of the mosaic case. The number of associations in which more than two acrocentric chromosomes were involved was unexpectedly low in the cells with a supernumerary chromosome 13.The result are interpreted as suggesting the existence of a compensatory mechanism activated by the additional acrocentric chromosome.Parts of this work are included in the doctoral (MD) thesis of DM     

Quantitative studies on the arrangement of human metaphase chromosomes

Summary The spatial relationships between the homologous pairs of chromosomes in the normal human colcemid-treated metaphase plate were tested by two different mathematical approaches: (a) determination of the distances between the centromeres of the homologous chromosomes compared to the mean distance of all centromeres of the mitosis in question; (b) measuring the distances of the different chromosomes from the center of the mitosis.The following results were obtained: (1) The arrangement of human metaphase chromosomes does not follow a normal distribution; the distribution is narrower and taller, probably due to an impairment of free chromosome spreading by the cell membrane. We believe that only in membraneless mitotic cells should the chromosome-spread correspond to a normal distribution under the same preparation conditions. (2) There is a positive correlation between decreasing chromosome size and decreasing mean distance between homologous chromosomes. (3) A close positive correlation exists between increasing chromosome size and increasing distance to the barycenter of the mitosis. (4) There is also a close positive correlation between the distance of homologous chromosome pairs and their distance from the center of the mitosis, i.e., with increasing distance from the center of the mitosis, the distance between the homologous partners increases. (5) The following statistically significant deviations from these rules could be established: (a) The large acrocentric chromosomes are closer associated, as one would expect from their size, probably due to their participation in the nucleolus organization; (b) in the female cell one of the two X chromosomes has an extremely peripheral localization; the X chromosomes are furthest apart of all pairs of homologous chromosomes; (c) the chromosome pairs 6 and 8 are relatively close together in spite of their peripheral position, suggesting a truc close association of the homologus partners; (d) the chromosome pair 18 has a more peripheral position than expected, and a relatively large mean distance between the homologous partners; (e) the chromosome pair 1 has a much more central position and a closer association than is expected from its size.     

Conservation of interphase chromatin nonhistone antigens as components of metaphase chromosomes

The degree of conservation of HeLa interphase chromatin nonhistone antigens among the nonhistones of isolated metaphase chromosomes was determined with immunological procedures. Proteins were separated on SDS-polyacrylamide gels and electrophoretically transferred to diazophenylthioether (DPT)-paper, which was then overlaid with antiserum to chromatin from interphase nuclei. The bound antibodies were detected with 125I-labeled protein A. Alternatively, polyacrylamide gels were directly overlaid with antiserum and with 125I-protein A. Densitometry of autoradiograms and stained gels revealed the degree of conservation of nonhistone antigenic determinants from interphase to metaphase to be over 90% for chromatin.     

Staining of interphase and metaphase chromosomes with Procion Yellow 4RS]

A method for staining proteins by procion yellow 4RS on preparates of metaphase and interphase chromosomes is suggested. It is shown that the dye is not bound to either native or denatured DNA in solution.     

Large-scale chromatin structural domains within mitotic and interphase chromosomes in vivo and in vitro

Higher-order chromatin structural domains approximately 130 nm in width are observed as prominent components of both Drosophila melanogaster and human mitotic chromosomes using buffer conditions which preserve chromosome morphology as determined by light microscopic comparison with chromosomes within living cells. Spatially discrete chromatin structural domains of similar size also exist as prominent components within interphase nuclei prepared under equivalent conditions. Examination of chromosomes during the anaphase-telophase transition suggests that chromosomes decondense largely through the progressive straightening or uncoiling of these large-scale chromatin domains. A quantitative analysis of the size distribution of these higher-order domains in telophase nuclei indicated a mean width of 126±36 nm. Three-dimensional views using stereopairs of chromosomes and interphase nuclei from 0.5 m thick sections suggest that these large-scale chromatin domains consist of 30 nm fibers packed by tight folding into larger, linear, fiber-like elements. Reduction in vitro of either polyamine or divalent cation concentrations within two different buffer systems results in a loss of these large-scale domains, with no higher-order chromatin organization evident above the 20–30 nm fiber. Under these conditions the DNA distribution within mitotic chromosomes and interphase nuclei appears significantly diffuse relative to the appearance by light microscopy within living cells, or, by electron microscopy, within cells fixed directly without permeabilization in buffer. These results suggest that these large-scale chromatin structural domains are fundamental elements of chromosome architecture in vivo.     

The nuclear skeleton and the spatial arrangement of chromosomes in the interphase nucleus of vertebrate somatic cells

Summary The topologic distribution of interphase chromosomes estabilished by using various cytologic methods and data concerning the DNA-nuclear skeleton interactions in isolated nuclear fractions were reviewed and discussed. Comparison of these different data clearly showed that the position of chromosomes observed in situ is in agreement with the results obtained from isolated nuclear fractions, indicating that all DNA molecules are bound to the peripheral nuclear skeleton. Moreover, the in situ position of the rDNA near the nuclear envelope can be correlated with the existence of a nuclear skeleton connected to the peripheral nuclear skeleton. Taking into account the discrepant results regarding the actual existence of an internal nuclear skeleton, we attempted to analyze how the various nuclear skeletal structures described in the literature can be involved in both the distribution of chromosomes and in their chromatin organization. As many questions are still unanswered, we considered the modes of investigation that seem to be the most promising.     

Intranuclear arrangement of human chromosome 12 is reflected in metaphase chromosomes as non-random bending

We have found a high correlation of non-random bending of human metaphase chromosome 12 with the intranuclear arrangement deduced by Nogami et al. (Chromosoma 108 (2000) 514), providing further evidence of the relation of non-random bending and the interphase organization of the nucleus.