Localization of type IV collagen a 1 to a 6 chains in basement membrane during mouse molar germ development.

The dental basement membrane (BM) putatively mediates epithelial-mesenchymal interactions during tooth morphogenesis and cytodifferentiation. Type IV collagen alpha chains, a major network-forming protein of the dental BM, was studied and results disclosed distinct expression patterns at different stages of mouse molar germ development. At the dental placode and bud stage, the BM of the oral epithelium expressed alpha 1, alpha 2, alpha 5 and alpha 6 chains while the gubernaculum dentis, in addition to the above four chains, also expressed a 4 chain. An asymmetrical expression for alpha 4, alpha 5 and alpha 6 chains was observed at the bud stage. At the early bell stage, the BM associated with the inner enamel epithelium (IEE) of molar germ expressed alpha 1, alpha 2 and alpha 4 chains while the BM of the outer enamel epithelium (OEE) expressed only alpha 1 and a 2 chains. With the onset of dentinogenesis, the collagen a chain profile of the IEE BM gradually disappeared. Howeverfrom the early to late bell stage, the gubernaculum dentis consistently expressed alpha 1, alpha 2, alpha 5 and a 6 chains resembling fetal oral mucosa. These findings suggest that stage- and position-specific distribution of type IV collagen alpha subunits occur during molar germ development and that these changes are essential for molar morphogenesis and cytodifferentiation.     

Determination of genes involved in the early process of molar root development initiation in rat by modified subtractive hybridization

Rat molars and incisors have different root patterning mechanisms: the former form a multirooted pattern while the latter form a single-rooted analogue. But the genetic signals that control root patterning are poorly understood. In this study, to identify the special molecular signals which may lead to the molar root development, we firstly observed that at embryonic day 19 the molar and the incisor began differentially developing: the molar formed double-layered cells of the root sheath while the incisor formed a cervical loop. By using the subtractive hybridization method, we successfully constructed a subtraction cDNA library of the rat molar and incisor tissues. Differentially expressed gene clones were evaluated by dot-blot and sequencing. Sel1l, Nfic, Edar, GATA6, and some novel genes were found differentially expressed, which were strongly related the tooth root patterning. It is anticipated that further study of genes identified will provide insights into their specific roles in the tooth root patterning.     

Molecular determinants during dental morphogenesis and cytodifferentiation: a review.

Craniofacial development provides a number of opportunities to investigate the cellular and molecular biology of morphogenesis, cytodifferentiation, tissue-specific extracellular matrix (ECM) formations, and biomineralization. Regulatory processes associated with mandibular morphogenesis and specifically tooth formation are being investigated by the identification of when and where molecular determinants such as cell adhesion molecules (CAMs), substrate adhesion molecules (SAMs), and tissue-specific structural gene products are expressed during sequential developmental stages. Based upon in vitro organotypic culture studies in serumless, chemically defined medium, instructive and permissive signaling has been found to be required for both mandibular and dental morphogenesis and cytodifferentiation. For example, intrinsic developmental instructions (autocrine and paracrine factors), independent of long-range hormonal or exogenous growth factors, mediate morphogenesis from the initiation of the dental lamina through crown and initial root stages of tooth development. This review summarizes recent results using experimental embryology, organ culture, recombinant DNA technology, and immunocytology to elucidate mechanisms responsive to instructive epithelial-mesenchymal interactions associated with mandibular morphogenesis, tooth positional information, and subsequent tooth crown and initial root development.     

The epithelial genotype controls the pattern of extracellular enamel prism formation

Abstract. Enamel formation in the developing tooth organ is the product of epithelial-mesenchymal interactions which result in the differentiation of ameloblasts, the secretion of enamel proteins, and the production of a highly organized extracellular matrix. The three-dimensional organization of enamel prisms is species-specific: irregular polygonshaped in rabbit and rectangular-shaped in mouse. We designed experiments to test the hypothesis that three-dimensional organization of enamel prism formation is genetically determined by epithelium; the prediction being that speciesspecific enamel prism pattern formation is expressed independent of mesenchymal instructions. Our strategy employs scanning electron microscopy to examine enamel prism patterns formed during rabbit and mouse tooth morphogenesis in situ and in vitro, and to then determine the specific tissue type required for regulating these patterns using heterotypic tissue recombinations. Morphometric analyses demonstrated that cap stage tooth organs cultured on the chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) formed enamel prisms equivalent to prism patterns observed for in situ controls. Heterotypic tissue recombinations, using cap stage molar organs, formed rabbit-like prisms with rabbit epithelium/mouse mesenchyme, and mouse-like prisms with mouse epithelium/rabbit mesenchyme. These results indicate that dental papilla mesenchyme has no apparent influence on enamel prism pattern formation. Enamel prism pattern appears to be genetically regulated by the inner enamel epithelium.     

Reiterative signaling and patterning during mammalian tooth morphogenesis

Mammalian dentition consists of teeth that develop as discrete organs. From anterior to posterior, the dentition is divided into regions of incisor, canine, premolar and molar tooth types. Particularly teeth in the molar region are very diverse in shape. The development of individual teeth involves epithelial-mesenchymal interactions that are mediated by signals shared with other organs. Parts of the molecular details of signaling networks have been established, particularly in the signal families BMP, FGF, Hh and Wnt, mostly by the analysis of gene expression and signaling responses in knockout mice with arrested tooth development. Recent evidence suggests that largely the same signaling cascade is used reiteratively throughout tooth development. The successional determination of tooth region, tooth type, tooth crown base and individual cusps involves signals that regulate tissue growth and differentiation. Tooth type appears to be determined by epithelial signals and to involve differential activation of homeobox genes in the mesenchyme. This differential signaling could have allowed the evolutionary divergence of tooth shapes among the four tooth types. The advancing tooth morphogenesis is punctuated by transient signaling centers in the epithelium corresponding to the initiation of tooth buds, tooth crowns and individual cusps. The latter two signaling centers, the primary enamel knot and the secondary enamel knot, have been well characterized and are thought to direct the differential growth and subsequent folding of the dental epithelium. Several members of the FGF signal family have been implicated in the control of cell proliferation around the non-dividing enamel knots. Spatiotemporal induction of the secondary enamel knots determines the cusp patterns of individual teeth and is likely to involve repeated activation and inhibition of signaling as suggested for patterning of other epithelial organs.     

GTPases RhoA and Rac1 are important for amelogenin and DSPP expression during differentiation of ameloblasts and odontoblasts

Morphogenesis and cytodifferentiation are distinct processes in tooth development. Cell proliferation predominates in morphogenesis; differentiation involves changes in form and gene expression. The cytoskeleton is essential for both processes, being regulated by Rho GTPases. The aim of this study was to verify the expression, distribution, and role of Rho GTPases in ameloblasts and odontoblasts during tooth development in correlation with actin and tubulin arrangements and amelogenin and dentin sialophosphoprotein (DSPP) expression. RhoA, Rac1, and Cdc42 were strongly expressed during morphogenesis; during cytodifferentiation, RhoA was present in ameloblasts and odontoblasts, Rac1 and its effector Pak3 were observed in ameloblasts; and Cdc42 was present in all cells of the tooth germ and mesenchyme. The expression of RhoA mRNA and its effectors RockI and RockII, Rac1 and Pak3, as analyzed by real-time polymerase chain reaction, increased after ameloblast and odontoblast differentiation, according to the mRNA expression of amelogenin and DSPP. The inhibition of all Rho GTPases by Clostridium difficile toxin A completely abolished amelogenin and DSPP expression in tooth germs cultured in anterior eye chamber, whereas the specific inhibition of the Rocks showed only a partial effect. Thus, both GTPases are important during tooth morphogenesis. During cytodifferentiation, Rho proteins are essential for the complete differentiation of ameloblasts and odontoblasts by regulating the expression of amelogenin and DSPP. RhoA and its effector RockI contribute to this role. A specific function for Rac1 in ameloblasts remains to be elucidated; its punctate distribution indicates its possible role in exocytosis/endocytosis.     

Coordinated expression of Hoxb genes and signaling molecules during development of the chick respiratory tract

To elucidate the molecular mechanism for regulating the region-specific morphogenesis of the chicken respiratory tract, we analyzed the spatiotemporal expression patterns of the Hoxb genes, Bmp-2, Bmp-4, Wnt-5a, and Wnt-11 in the developing respiratory tract. We found region-specific expression of these genes in the mesenchymal layer of the respiratory tract. Before bronchial branching proceeds, Hoxb genes show nested expression patterns around the ventral-distal tip of the lung bud. As morphogenesis proceeds, these expression domains correspond to the morphological subdivisions of the chick respiratory tract. Hoxb-5 and Hoxb-6 expression domains demarcate the trachea, bronchial tree, and air sacs. Particularly the expression domains of Hoxb-6 to -9 correspond to the morphological subdivisions of the air sacs along the proximodistal axis. Bmp-4 and Bmp-2 are expressed throughout the entire pulmonary mesenchyme and its dorsal half, respectively. Wnt-5a and Wnt-11 are expressed in the tracheal mesenchyme. Interestingly, the expression domain of Bmp-2 is complementary to the Hoxb-6 domain. The respiratory mesenchyme influences the process of epithelial branching during morphogenesis. By tissue recombination experiments, we found that the dorsal and the ventral pulmonary mesenchyme, demarcated by Hoxb-6 expression, have different inductive capacities toward the tracheal epithelium. These observations suggest the possibility that Hoxb genes are involved in the system specifying regional differences in morphogenesis and cytodifferentiation of respiratory tract. In addition, it is possible that BMPs and WNTs mediate region-specific epithelial-mesenchymal interaction in this system.