A Novel Structural Unit in the N-terminal Region of Filamins

Immunoglobulin-like (Ig) domains are a widely expanded superfamily that act as interaction motifs or as structural spacers in multidomain proteins. Vertebrate filamins (FLNs), which are multifunctional actin-binding proteins, consist of 24 Ig domains. We have recently discovered that in the C-terminal rod 2 region of FLN, Ig domains interact with each other forming functional domain pairs, where the interaction with signaling and transmembrane proteins is mechanically regulated by weak actomyosin contraction forces. Here, we investigated if there are similar inter-domain interactions around domain 4 in the N-terminal rod 1 region of FLN. Protein crystal structures revealed a new type of domain organization between domains 3, 4, and 5. In this module, domains 4 and 5 interact rather tightly, whereas domain 3 has a partially flexible interface with domain 4. NMR peptide titration experiments showed that within the three-domain module, domain 4 is capable for interaction with a peptide derived from platelet glycoprotein Ib. Crystal structures of FLN domains 4 and 5 in complex with the peptide revealed a typical β sheet augmentation interaction observed for many FLN ligands. Domain 5 was found to stabilize domain 4, and this could provide a mechanism for the regulation of domain 4 interactions.     

Flexible Structure of Peptide-Bound Filamin A Mechanosensor Domain Pair 20–21

Filamins (FLNs) are large, multidomain actin cross-linking proteins with diverse functions. Besides regulating the actin cytoskeleton, they serve as important links between the extracellular matrix and the cytoskeleton by binding cell surface receptors, functioning as scaffolds for signaling proteins, and binding several other cytoskeletal proteins that regulate cell adhesion dynamics. Structurally, FLNs are formed of an amino terminal actin-binding domain followed by 24 immunoglobulin-like domains (IgFLNs). Recent studies have demonstrated that myosin-mediated contractile forces can reveal hidden protein binding sites in the domain pairs IgFLNa18–19 and 20–21, enabling FLNs to transduce mechanical signals in cells. The atomic structures of these mechanosensor domain pairs in the resting state are known, as well as the structures of individual IgFLN21 with ligand peptides. However, little experimental data is available on how interacting protein binding deforms the domain pair structures. Here, using small-angle x-ray scattering-based modelling, x-ray crystallography, and NMR, we show that the adaptor protein migfilin-derived peptide-bound structure of IgFLNa20–21 is flexible and adopts distinctive conformations depending on the presence or absence of the interacting peptide. The conformational changes reported here may be common for all peptides and may play a role in the mechanosensor function of the site.     

1H, 13C and 15N resonance assignments of the human filamin A tandem immunoglobulin-like domains 16–17 and 18–19

Filamins are large actin-binding and cross-linking proteins which act as linkers between the cytoskeleton and various signaling proteins. Filamin A (FLNa) is the most abundant of the three filamin isoforms found in humans. FLNa contains an N-terminal actin-binding domain and 24 immunoglobulin-like (Ig) domains. The Ig domains are responsible for the FLNa dimerization and most of the interactions that FLNa has with numerous other proteins. There are several crystal and solution structures from isolated single Ig domains of filamins in the PDB database, but only few from longer constructs. Here, we present nearly complete chemical shift assignments of FLNa tandem Ig domains 16–17 and 18–19. Chemical shift mapping between FLNa tandem Ig domain 16–17 and isolated domain 17 suggests a novel domain–domain interaction mode.     

Structural basis of the migfilin-filamin interaction and competition with integrin beta tails

A link between sites of cell adhesion and the cytoskeleton is essential for regulation of cell shape, motility, and signaling. Migfilin is a recently identified adaptor protein that localizes at cell-cell and cell-extracellular matrix adhesion sites, where it is thought to provide a link to the cytoskeleton by interacting with the actin cross-linking protein filamin. Here we have used x-ray crystallography, NMR spectroscopy, and protein-protein interaction studies to investigate the molecular basis of migfilin binding to filamin. We report that the N-terminal portion of migfilin can bind all three human filamins (FLNa, -b, or -c) and that there are multiple migfilin-binding sites in FLNa. Human filamins are composed of an N-terminal actin-binding domain followed by 24 immunoglobulin-like (IgFLN) domains and we find that migfilin binds preferentially to IgFLNa21 and more weakly to IgFLNa19 and -22. The filamin-binding site in migfilin is localized between Pro(5) and Pro(19) and binds to the CD face of the IgFLNa21 beta-sandwich. This interaction is similar to the previously characterized beta 7 integrin-IgFLNa21 interaction and migfilin and integrin beta tails can compete with one another for binding to IgFLNa21. This suggests that competition between filamin ligands for common binding sites on IgFLN domains may provide a general means of modulating filamin interactions and signaling. In this specific case, displacement of integrin tails from filamin by migfilin may provide a mechanism for switching between different integrin-cytoskeleton linkages.     

Atomic Structures of Two Novel Immunoglobulin-like Domain Pairs in the Actin Cross-linking Protein Filamin

Filamins are actin filament cross-linking proteins composed of an N-terminal actin-binding domain and 24 immunoglobulin-like domains (IgFLNs). Filamins interact with numerous proteins, including the cytoplasmic domains of plasma membrane signaling and cell adhesion receptors. Thereby filamins mechanically and functionally link the cell membrane to the cytoskeleton. Most of the interactions have been mapped to the C-terminal IgFLNs 16–24. Similarly, as with the previously known compact domain pair of IgFLNa20–21, the two-domain fragments IgFLNa16–17 and IgFLNa18–19 were more compact in small angle x-ray scattering analysis than would be expected for two independent domains. Solution state NMR structures revealed that the domain packing in IgFLNa18–19 resembles the structure of IgFLNa20–21. In both domain pairs the integrin-binding site is masked, although the details of the domain-domain interaction are partly distinct. The structure of IgFLNa16–17 revealed a new domain packing mode where the adhesion receptor binding site of domain 17 is not masked. Sequence comparison suggests that similar packing of three tandem filamin domain pairs is present throughout the animal kingdom, and we propose that this packing is involved in the regulation of filamin interactions through a mechanosensor mechanism.Actin cytoskeleton is a dynamic network that is involved in many fundamental cellular processes such as cell differentiation, morphology, endocytosis, exocytosis, cytokinesis, and cell movement. These events are regulated by proteins that interact with monomeric and filamentous actin. Filamins are actin filament-binding and cross-linking proteins. Filamin A and filamin B are both ubiquitously expressed, and their mutations in human patients cause developmental abnormalities in brain, cartilage, bones, and epithelial tissues (1). Filamin C is muscle-specific, and mutations thereof cause myofibrillar myopathy (2). Mice with targeted deletion of any of the filamin genes die either during development or soon after birth (3–6). These phenotypes are thought to reflect the roles of filamins as scaffolds of signaling pathways required for cell differentiation, regulators of cell migration, and stabilizers of cytoskeleton and cell membranes (1, 7).Filamins bind to actin filaments mainly via their N-terminal actin-binding domains and interact with other proteins via the 24 filamin type immunoglobulin-like domains (IgFLN),³ also called filamin repeats (8). Especially the C-terminal IgFLNs 16–24 contain several protein-protein interaction sites (1). Our previous structural studies have revealed that many proteins interact with filamins by forming an additional β-strand next to strand C of an individual IgFLN. The platelet von Willebrand factor receptor, glycoprotein (GP) Ibα, interacts in this way with IgFLNa17 (9). The integrin family adhesion receptor β subunits interact with IgFLNa21 and to a lesser extent with IgFLNa19 (10, 11). Furthermore, some signaling proteins use a similar interaction mode: the adaptor protein migfilin interacts with IgFLNa21 (12), and the Rho family GTPase-activating protein FilGAP interacts with IgFLNa23 (13, 14).Although structural details are known from many filamin interactions, it is not completely clear how these interactions are regulated. In some cases the regulation involves competition between multiple binding partners (10, 11). Alternative splicing (15), proteolysis of filamin (16–18), and ligand phosphorylation (11) also contribute to the regulation. Recently, it has become apparent that conformational changes in filamins may also be involved. For instance, actomyosin contraction exposes hidden cysteine residues in filamins (19). This opens the possibility that forces transmitted through actin filament may open up binding sites, and filamin may thus be involved in mechanosensor signaling.We have recently found a structural mechanism by which mechanical forces could regulate interactions at the C-terminal part of filamin. Our recent crystal structure revealed that IgFLNa20 forms a compact pair with IgFLNa21, and in this pair the N-terminal part of IgFLNa20 masks the integrin-binding site on IgFLNa21 (15). It is possible that this masking could be released by mechanical forces. Four lines of evidence led us to hypothesize that in addition to the IgFLNa20–21 pair, other similar domain pairs could exist at the C terminus of filamin: (i) the overall structure of the C-terminal part (IgFLNs 16–24) of filamin is relatively more compact than the N-terminal part of the molecule (IgFLNs 1–15) (8); (ii) the N-terminal sequences of even-numbered domains 16, 18, and 20 differ from other IgFLNs (20) (sequence alignment is shown in supplemental Fig. S1); (iii) in single-domain solution NMR structures of IgFLNc16, IgFLNb16, 18, and 20, the N-terminal part is not folded with the rest of the domain; and (iv) according to biochemical experiments, IgFLNa18 masks integrin binding to IgFLNa19 (15). We report here small angle x-ray scattering (SAXS) analysis showing that IgFLNa16–17 and 18–19 have overall dimensions very similar to those of the previously known domain pair IgFLNa20–21. The IgFLNa22–23 construct was much more elongated, which is indicative for two independently folded noninteracting domains. Further, the atomic structures solved with NMR spectroscopy show that IgFLNa18–19 forms a pair similar to IgFLNa20–21, but the details of the interaction and orientation of the domains differ. On the other hand, IgFLNa16–17 forms an entirely novel type of domain pair. Sequence comparisons predict that these three interdependent domain pairs are conserved from nematodes to vertebrates, suggesting that the arrangement has special regulatory functions.     

Mammalian Tropomodulins Nucleate Actin Polymerization via Their Actin Monomer Binding and Filament Pointed End-capping Activities

Many actin-binding proteins have been shown to possess multiple activities to regulate filament dynamics. Tropomodulins (Tmod1–4) are a conserved family of actin filament pointed end-capping proteins. Our previous work has demonstrated that Tmod3 binds to monomeric actin in addition to capping pointed ends. Here, we show a novel actin-nucleating activity in mammalian Tmods. Comparison of Tmod isoforms revealed that Tmod1–3 but not Tmod4 nucleate actin filament assembly. All Tmods bind to monomeric actin, and Tmod3 forms a 1:1 complex with actin. By truncation and mutagenesis studies, we demonstrated that the second α-helix in the N-terminal domain of Tmod3 is essential for actin monomer binding. Chemical cross-linking and LC-MS/MS further indicated that residues in this second α-helix interact with actin subdomain 2, whereas Tmod3 N-terminal domain peptides distal to this α-helix interact with actin subdomain 1. Mutagenesis of Leu-73 to Asp, which disrupts the second α-helix of Tmod3, decreases both its actin monomer-binding and -nucleating activities. On the other hand, point mutations of residues in the C-terminal leucine-rich repeat domain of Tmod3 (Lys-317 in the fifth leucine-rich repeat β-sheet and Lys-344 or Arg-345/Arg-346 in the C-terminal α6-helix) significantly reduced pointed end-capping and nucleation without altering actin monomer binding. Taken together, our data indicate that Tmod3 binds actin monomers over an extended interface and that nucleating activity depends on actin monomer binding and pointed end-capping activities, contributed by N- and C-terminal domains of Tmod3, respectively. Tmod3 nucleation of actin assembly may regulate the cytoskeleton in dynamic cellular contexts.     

The N-terminal domain of MYO18A has an ATP-insensitive actin-binding site

Myosin XVIII is the recently identified 18th class of myosins, and its members are composed of a unique N-terminal domain, a motor domain with an unusual sequence around the ATPase site, one IQ motif, a segmented coiled-coil region for dimerization, and a C-terminal globular tail. To gain insight into the functions of this unique myosin, we characterized its human homologue, MYO18A, focusing on the functional roles of the characteristic N-terminal domain that contains a PDZ module known to mediate protein-protein interaction. GFP-tagged full-length and C-terminally truncated MYO18A molecules that were expressed in HeLa cells exhibited colocalization with actin filaments. Chemical cross-linking of these molecules showed that they form stable dimers as expected from their putative coiled-coil tails. Cosedimentation of the various types of truncated MYO18A constructs with actin filaments indicated the presence of an ATP-insensitive actin-binding site in the N-terminal domain. Further studies on truncated constructs of the N-terminal domain indicated that this actin-binding site is located outside the PDZ module, but within the middle region of this domain, which does not show any homology with the known actin-binding motifs. These results imply that this dimeric myosin might stably cross-link actin filaments by two ATP-insensitive actin-binding sites at the N-terminal domains for higher-order organization of the actin cytoskeleton.     

The limits of promiscuity: isoform-specific dimerization of filamins

Filamins are a family of actin cross-linking proteins that are primarily localized in the cortical cytoplasm of all mammalian cells. Until now, three major isoforms (filamins a, b, and c) have been identified, that were shown to be differentially expressed and/or localized in different tissues. An amino-terminal double CH-domain actin binding domain, and a dimerization region in the carboxy-terminal portion of the protein are the molecular basis for its actin cross-linking activity. Chemical cross-linking of bacterially expressed recombinant proteins was used to demonstrate that in all three filamin isoforms the most carboxy-terminally situated immunoglobulinlike domain is required and sufficient for dimerization. The efficiency of the dimerization was increased upon inclusion of the preceding hinge 2 region, indicating a function for this region in the regulation of dimerization. By mixing recombinant proteins derived from different filamin isoforms, we found that heterodimer formation is possible between filamins b and c but not between filamin a and the other two filamins. This selectivity of dimerization might provide a further molecular explanation for the differential intracellular sorting of filamin isoforms and their distinct properties.     

Interactions of the basic N-terminal and the acidic C-terminal domains of the maize chromosomal HMGB1 protein

Maize HMGB1 is a typical member of the family of plant chromosomal HMGB proteins, which have a central high-mobility group (HMG)-box DNA-binding domain that is flanked by a basic N-terminal region and a highly acidic C-terminal domain. The basic N-terminal domain positively influences various DNA interactions of the protein, while the acidic C-terminal domain has the opposite effect. Using DNA-cellulose binding and electrophoretic mobility shift assays, we demonstrate that the N-terminal basic domain binds DNA by itself, consistent with its positive effects on the DNA interactions of HMGB1. To examine whether the negative effect of the acidic C-terminal domain is brought about by interactions with the basic part of HMGB1 (N-terminal region, HMG-box domain), intramolecular cross-linking in combination with formic acid cleavage of the protein was used. These experiments revealed that the acidic C-terminal domain interacts with the basic N-terminal domain. The intramolecular interaction between the two oppositely charged termini of the protein is enhanced when serine residues in the acidic tail of HMGB1 are phosphorylated by protein kinase CK2, which can explain the negative effect of the phosphorylation on certain DNA interactions. In line with that, covalent cross-linking of the two terminal domains resulted in a reduced affinity of HMGB1 for linear DNA. Comparable to the finding with maize HMGB1, the basic N-terminal and the acidic C-terminal domains of the Arabidopsis HMGB1 and HMGB4 proteins interact, indicating that these intramolecular interactions, which can modulate HMGB protein function, generally occur in plant HMGB proteins.     

Liberation of the intramolecular interaction as the mechanism of heat-induced activation of HSP90 molecular chaperone.

The molecular chaperone function of HSP90 is activated under heat-stress conditions. In the present study, we investigated the role of the interactions in the heat-induced activation of HSP90 molecular chaperone. The preceding paper demonstrated two domain-domain interactions of HtpG, an Escherichia coli homologue of mammalian HSP90, i.e. an intra-molecular interaction between the N-terminal and middle domains and an intermolecular one between the middle and C-terminal domains. A bacterial two-hybrid system revealed that the two interactions also existed in human HSP90alpha. Partners of the interaction between the N-terminal and middle domains of human HSP90alpha could, but those between the middle and C-terminal domains could not, be replaced by the domains of HtpG. Thus, the interface between the N-terminal and middle domains is essentially unvaried from bacterial to human members of the HSP90-family proteins. The citrate synthase-binding activity of HtpG at an elevated temperature was solely localized in the N-terminal domain, but HSP90alpha possessed two sites in the N-terminal and other domains. The citrate-synthase-binding activity of the N-terminal domain was suppressed by the association of the middle domain. The complex between the N-terminal and middle domains is labile at elevated temperatures, but the other is stable even at 70 degrees C. Taken together, we propose the liberation of the N-terminal client-binding domain from the middle suppressor domain is involved in the temperature-dependent activation mechanism of HSP90 molecular chaperone.     

Domain mapping of the Rad51 paralog protein complexes

The five human Rad51 paralogs are suggested to play an important role in the maintenance of genome stability through their function in DNA double-strand break repair. These proteins have been found to form two distinct complexes in vivo, Rad51B–Rad51C–Rad51D–Xrcc2 (BCDX2) and Rad51C–Xrcc3 (CX3). Based on the recent Pyrococcus furiosus Rad51 structure, we have used homology modeling to design deletion mutants of the Rad51 paralogs. The models of the human Rad51B, Rad51C, Xrcc3 and murine Rad51D (mRad51D) proteins reveal distinct N-terminal and C-terminal domains connected by a linker region. Using yeast two-hybrid and co-immunoprecipitation techniques, we have demonstrated that a fragment of Rad51B containing amino acid residues 1–75 interacts with the C-terminus and linker of Rad51C, residues 79–376, and this region of Rad51C also interacts with mRad51D and Xrcc3. We have also determined that the N-terminal domain of mRad51D, residues 4–77, binds to Xrcc2 while the C-terminal domain of mRad51D, residues 77–328, binds Rad51C. By this, we have identified the binding domains of the BCDX2 and CX3 complexes to further characterize the interaction of these proteins and propose a scheme for the three-dimensional architecture of the BCDX2 and CX3 paralog complexes.     

Drosophila Kelch Is an Oligomeric Ring Canal Actin Organizer

Drosophila kelch has four protein domains, two of which are found in kelch-family proteins and in numerous nonkelch proteins. In Drosophila, kelch is required to maintain ring canal organization during oogenesis. We have performed a structure–function analysis to study the function of Drosophila kelch. The amino-terminal region (NTR) regulates the timing of kelch localization to the ring canals. Without the NTR, the protein localizes precociously and destabilizes the ring canals and the germ cell membranes, leading to dominant sterility. The amino half of the protein including the BTB domain mediates dimerization. Oligomerization through the amino half of kelch might allow cross-linking of ring canal actin filaments, organizing the inner rim cytoskeleton. The kelch repeat domain is necessary and sufficient for ring canal localization and likely mediates an additional interaction, possibly with actin.     

A zyxin head-tail interaction regulates zyxin-VASP complex formation

Zyxin is an adhesion protein that regulates actin assembly by binding to VASP family members through N-terminal proline-rich motifs. Evidence suggests that zyxin’s C-terminal LIM domains function as a negative regulator of zyxin-VASP complexes. Zyxin LIM domains access to binding partners is negatively regulated by an unknown mechanism. One possibility is that zyxin LIM domains mediate a head-tail interaction, blocking interactions with other proteins. Such a mechanism might prevent both zyxin-VASP complexes activity and LIM domain access. In this report, the effect of LIM domains on zyxin-VASP complex assembly is defined. We find that zyxin LIM domains associate with zyxin’s VASP binding sites, preventing zyxin from binding to PKA-phosphorylated VASP. Unphosphorylated VASP overcomes the head-tail interaction, a result of a direct interaction with the LIM domain region. Zyxin, like a growing number of actin regulators, is controlled by intramolecular interactions.     

Structural basis for vertebrate filamin dimerization

Filamins are essential in cell motility and many developmental processes. They are large actin cross linking proteins that contain actin binding domains in their N termini and a long rod region constructed from 24 tandem Ig domains. Dimerization is crucial for the actin crosslinking function of filamins and requires the most C-terminal Ig domain. We describe here the crystal structure of this 24th Ig domain (Ig24) of human filamin C and show how it mediates dimerization. The dimer interface is novel and quite different to that seen in the Dictyostelium discoideum filamin analog. The sequence signature of the dimerization interface suggests that the C-terminal domains of all vertebrate filamins share the same dimerization mechanism. Furthermore, we show that point mutations in the dimerization interface disrupt the dimer and that the dissociation constant for recombinant Ig24 is in the micromolar range.     

Neural cell adhesion molecule (N-CAM) homophilic binding mediated by the two N-terminal Ig domains is influenced by intramolecular domain-domain interactions

The mechanism by which the neural cell adhesion molecule, N-CAM, mediates homophilic interactions between cells has been variously attributed to an isologous interaction of the third immunoglobulin (Ig) domain, to reciprocal binding of the two N-terminal Ig domains, or to reciprocal interactions of all five Ig domains. Here, we have used a panel of recombinant proteins in a bead binding assay, as well as transfected and primary cells, to clarify the molecular mechanism of N-CAM homophilic binding. The entire extracellular region of N-CAM mediated bead aggregation in a concentration- and temperature-dependent manner. Interactions of the N-terminal Ig domains, Ig1 and Ig2, were essential for bead binding, based on deletion and mutation experiments and on antibody inhibition studies. These findings were largely in accord with aggregation experiments using transfected L cells or primary chick brain cells. Additionally, maximal binding was dependent on the integrity of the intramolecular domain-domain interactions throughout the extracellular region. We propose that these interactions maintain the relative orientation of each domain in an optimal configuration for binding. Our results suggest that the role of Ig3 in homophilic binding is largely structural. Several Ig3-specific reagents failed to affect N-CAM binding on beads or on cells, while an inhibitory effect of an Ig3-specific monoclonal antibody is probably due to perturbations at the Ig2-Ig3 boundary. Thus, it appears that reciprocal interactions between Ig1 and Ig2 are necessary and sufficient for N-CAM homophilic binding, but that maximal binding requires the quaternary structure of the extracellular region defined by intramolecular domain-domain interactions.     

Crystal Structure of a Complex between Amino and Carboxy Terminal Fragments of mDia1: Insights into Autoinhibition of Diaphanous-Related Formins

Formin proteins direct the nucleation and assembly of linear actin filaments in a variety of cellular processes using their conserved formin homology 2 (FH2) domain. Diaphanous-related formins (DRFs) are effectors of Rho-family GTPases, and in the absence of Rho activation they are maintained in an inactive state by intramolecular interactions between their regulatory N-terminal region and a C-terminal segment referred to as the DAD domain. Although structures are available for the isolated DAD segment in complex with the interacting region in the N-terminus, it remains unclear how this leads to inhibition of actin assembly by the FH2 domain. Here we describe the crystal structure of the N-terminal regulatory region of formin mDia1 in complex with a C-terminal fragment containing both the FH2 and DAD domains. In the crystal structure and in solution, these fragments form a tetrameric complex composed of two interlocking N+C dimers. Formation of the tetramer is likely a consequence of the particular N-terminal construct employed, as we show that a nearly full-length mDia1 protein is dimeric, as are other autoinhibited N+C complexes containing longer N-terminal fragments. The structure provides the first view of the intact C-terminus of a DRF, revealing the relationship of the DAD to the FH2 domain. Delineation of alternative dimeric N+C interactions within the tetramer provides two general models for autoinhibition in intact formins. In both models, engagement of the DAD by the N-terminus is incompatible with actin filament formation on the FH2, and in one model the actin binding surfaces of the FH2 domain are directly blocked by the N-terminus.     

Functional Characterization of Human Myosin-18A and Its Interaction with F-actin and GOLPH3

Molecular motors of the myosin superfamily share a generic motor domain region. They commonly bind actin in an ATP-sensitive manner, exhibit actin-activated ATPase activity, and generate force and movement in this interaction. Class-18 myosins form heavy chain dimers and contain protein interaction domains located at their unique N-terminal extension. Here, we characterized human myosin-18A molecular function in the interaction with nucleotides, F-actin, and its putative binding partner, the Golgi-associated phosphoprotein GOLPH3. We show that myosin-18A comprises two actin binding sites. One is located in the KE-rich region at the start of the N-terminal extension and appears to mediate ATP-independent binding to F-actin. The second actin-binding site resides in the generic motor domain and is regulated by nucleotide binding in the absence of intrinsic ATP hydrolysis competence. This core motor domain displays its highest actin affinity in the ADP state. Electron micrographs of myosin-18A motor domain-decorated F-actin filaments show a periodic binding pattern independent of the nucleotide state. We show that the PDZ module mediates direct binding of myosin-18A to GOLPH3, and this interaction in turn modulates the actin binding properties of the N-terminal extension. Thus, myosin-18A can act as an actin cross-linker with multiple regulatory modulators that targets interacting proteins or complexes to the actin-based cytoskeleton.     

A new member of the LIM protein family binds to filamin B and localizes at stress fibers

Human filamins are 280-kDa proteins containing an N-terminal actin-binding domain followed by 24 characteristic repeats. They also interact with a number of other cellular proteins. All of those identified to date, with the exception of actin, bind to the C-terminal third of a filamin. In a yeast two-hybrid search of a human placental library, using as bait repeats 10-18 of filamin B, we isolated a cDNA coding for a novel 374 amino acid protein containing a proline-rich domain near its N terminus and two LIM domains at its C terminus. We term this protein filamin-binding LIM protein-1, FBLP-1. Yeast two-hybrid studies with deletion mutants localized the areas of interaction in FBLP-1 to its N-terminal domain and in filamin B to repeats 10-13. FBLP-1 mRNA was detected in a variety of tissues and cells including platelets and endothelial cells. We also have identified two FBLP-1 variants. Both contain three C-terminal LIM domains, but one lacks the N-terminal proline-rich domain. Transfection of FBLP-1 into 293A cells promoted stress fiber formation, and both FBLP-1 and filamin B localized to stress fibers in the transfected cells. The association between filamin B and FBLP-1 may play a hitherto unknown role in cytoskeletal function, cell adhesion, and cell motility.     

Characterization of the Raptor/4E-BP1 Interaction by Chemical Cross-linking Coupled with Mass Spectrometry Analysis

mTORC1 plays critical roles in the regulation of protein synthesis, growth, and proliferation in response to nutrients, growth factors, and energy conditions. One of the substrates of mTORC1 is 4E-BP1, whose phosphorylation by mTORC1 reverses its inhibitory action on eIF4E, resulting in the promotion of protein synthesis. Raptor in mTOR complex 1 is believed to recruit 4E-BP1, facilitating phosphorylation of 4E-BP1 by the kinase mTOR. We applied chemical cross-linking coupled with mass spectrometry analysis to gain insight into interactions between mTORC1 and 4E-BP1. Using the cross-linking reagent bis[sulfosuccinimidyl] suberate, we showed that Raptor can be cross-linked with 4E-BP1. Mass spectrometric analysis of cross-linked Raptor-4E-BP1 led to the identification of several cross-linked peptide pairs. Compilation of these peptides revealed that the most N-terminal Raptor N-terminal conserved domain (in particular residues from 89 to 180) of Raptor is the major site of interaction with 4E-BP1. On 4E-BP1, we found that cross-links with Raptor were clustered in the central region (amino acid residues 56–72) we call RCR (Raptor cross-linking region). Intramolecular cross-links of Raptor suggest the presence of two structured regions of Raptor: one in the N-terminal region and the other in the C-terminal region. In support of the idea that the Raptor N-terminal conserved domain and the 4E-BP1 central region are closely located, we found that peptides that encompass the RCR of 4E-BP1 inhibit cross-linking and interaction of 4E-BP1 with Raptor. Furthermore, mutations of residues in the RCR decrease the ability of 4E-BP1 to serve as a substrate for mTORC1 in vitro and in vivo.