Investigation of restriction enzyme cofactor requirements: a relationship between metal ion properties and sequence specificity

Restriction enzymes are important model systems for understanding the mechanistic contributions of metal ions to nuclease activity. These systems are unique in that they combine distinct functions which have been shown to depend on metal ions: high-affinity DNA binding, sequence-specific recognition of DNA, and Mg(II)-dependent phosphodiester cleavage. While Ca(II) and Mn(II) are commonly used to promote DNA binding and cleavage, respectively, the metal ion properties that are critical to the support of these functions are not clear. To address this question, we assessed the abilities of a series of metal ions to promote DNA binding, sequence specificity, and cleavage in the representative PvuII endonuclease. Among the metal ions tested [Ca(II), Sr(II), Ba(II), Eu(III), Tb(III), Cd(II), Mn(II), Co(II), and Zn(II)], only Mn(II) and Co(II) were similar enough to Mg(II) to support detectable cleavage activity. Interestingly, cofactor requirements for the support of DNA binding are much more permissive; the survey of DNA binding cofactors indicated that Cd(II) and the heavier and larger alkaline earth metal ions Sr(II) and Ba(II) were effective cofactors, stimulating DNA binding affinity 20-200-fold. Impressively, the trivalent lanthanides Tb(III) and Eu(III) promoted DNA binding as efficiently as Ca(II), corresponding to an increase in affinity over 1000-fold higher than that observed under metal-free conditions. The trend for DNA binding affinity supported by these ions suggests that ionic radius and charge are not critical to the promotion of DNA binding. To examine the role of metal ions in sequence discrimination, we determined specificity factors [K(a)(specific)/K(a)(nonspecific)] in the presence of Cd(II), Ba(II), and Tb(III). Most interestingly, all of these ions compromised sequence specificity to some degree compared to Ca(II), by either increased affinity for a noncognate sequence, decreased affinity for the cognate sequence, or both. These results suggest that while amino acid-base contacts are important for specificity, the properties of metal ion cofactors at the catalytic site are also critical for sequence discrimination. This insight is invaluable to our efforts to understand and subsequently design sequence-specific nucleases.     

Dissecting the metal ion dependence of DNA binding by PvuII endonuclease.

Divalent cations can provide an effective means of modulating the behavior of nucleic acid binding proteins. As a result, there is strong interest in understanding the role of metal ions in the function of both nucleic acid binding proteins and their enzymes. We have applied complementary fluorescence spectroscopic and nitrocellulose filter binding assays to quantitate the role of metal ions in mediating DNA binding and sequence specificity by the representative PvuII endonuclease. At pH 7.5 in the presence of the catalytically nonsupportive Ca(II), this enzyme binds the PvuII target sequence with a K(d) of 50 pM. Under strict metal-free conditions, the enzyme exhibits a K(d) of only 300 nM for the cognate sequence, an affinity which is weak relative to those measured for other systems in the absence of metal ions. This represents a 6000-fold increase in PvuII affinity for cognate DNA upon the addition of Ca(II). The pH dependences of both metal ion-dependent and metal ion-independent DNA binding are remarkably shallow throughout the physiological range; other characterized restriction enzymes exhibit more pronounced pH dependences of DNA binding even in the absence of metal ions. Similar measurements with noncognate sequences indicate that divalent metal ions are not important to nonspecific DNA binding; K(d) values are approximately equal to 200 nM throughout the physiological pH range, a behavior shared with other endonucleases. While some of these results extend somewhat the range of expected behavior for restriction enzymes, these results indicate that PvuII endonuclease shares with other characterized systems a mechanism by which cognate affinity and sequence discrimination are most effectively achieved in the presence of divalent metal ions.     

The role of weak specific and nonspecific interactions in recognition and conversation by enzymes of long DNA

According to a currently accepted model, enzymes engage in high-rate sliding along DNA when searching for specific recognition sequences or structural elements (modified nucleotides, breaks, single-stranded DNA fragments, etc.). Such sliding requires these enzymes to possess sufficiently high affinity for DNA of any sequence. Thus, significant differences in the enzymes' affinity for specific and nonspecific DNA sequences cannot be expected, and formation of a complex between an enzyme and its target DNA unlikely contributes significantly in the enzyme specificity. To elucidate the factors providing the specificity we have analyzed many DNA replication, DNA repair, topoisomerization, integration, and recombination enzymes using a number of physicochemical methods, including a method of stepwise increase in ligand complexity developed in our laboratory. It was shown that high affinity of all studied enzymes for long DNA is provided by formation of many weak contacts of the enzymes with all nucleotide units covered by protein globules. Contacts of positively charged amino acid residues with internucleotide phosphate groups contribute most to such interactions; the contribution of each contact is very small and the full contact interface usually resembles interactions between oppositely charged biopolymer surfaces. In some cases significant contribution to the affinity is made through hydrophobic and/or van der Waals interactions of the enzymes with nucleobases. Overall, depending on the enzyme, such nonspecific interactions provide 5-8 orders of the enzyme affinity for DNA. Specific interactions of enzymes with long DNA, in contrast to contacts of enzymes with small ligands, are usually weak and comparable in efficiency with weak nonspecific contacts. The sum of specific interactions most often provides approximately one and rarely two orders of the affinity. According to structural data, DNA binding to any of the investigated enzymes is followed by a stage of DNA conformation adjustment including partial or complete DNA melting, deformation of its backbone, stretching, compression, bending or kinking, eversion of nucleotides from the DNA helix, etc. The full set of such changes is characteristic for each individual enzyme. The fact that all enzyme-dependent changes in DNA are effected through weak specific rather than strong interactions is very important. Enzyme-specific changes in DNA conformation are required for effective adjustment of reacting orbitals with accuracy about 10-15 degrees, which is possible only for specific DNA. A transition from nonspecific to specific DNA leads to an increase in the reaction rate (kcat) by 4-8 orders of magnitude. Thus, the stages of DNA conformation adjustment and catalysis proper provide the high specificity of enzyme action.     

The Role of Weak Specific and Nonspecific Interactions in Enzymatic Recognition and Conversion of Long DNAs

According to the currently accepted model, enzymes searching for specific recognition sequences or structural elements (modified nucleotides, breaks, single-stranded DNA fragments, etc.) slide at a high rate along DNA. Such sliding is possible only if the enzymes possess sufficiently high affinity for all DNA, sequence notwithstanding. Therefore, significant differences in their affinity for specific and nonspecific DNA sequences are unlikely, and the formation of a complex between an enzyme and its target DNA is not a basic factor of enzyme specificity. To elucidate such factors, we have analyzed many DNA replication, DNA repair, topoisomerization, integration, and recombination enzymes using a number of physicochemical methods, including the method of stepwise increase in ligand complexity developed in our laboratory. It has been shown that high affinity of all studied enzymes for long DNAs is provided by the formation of many weak contacts of the enzyme with all nucleotide units covered by the protein globule. The main role lies in the contact between positively charged amino acid residues and internucleoside phosphate groups; however, the contribution of each contact is very small, and the full contact interface usually resembles that characteristic of interactions between oppositely charged biopolymer surfaces. In some cases, a significant contribution to the affinity is made through hydrophobic and/or van der Waals interactions of the enzymes with nucleotide bases. On the whole, such nonspecific interactions provide for five to eight orders of enzyme affinity for DNA, depending on the enzyme. Specific interactions of enzymes with long DNAs, in contrast to their contacts with small ligands, are usually weak and comparable in efficiency with weak nonspecific contacts. The sum of specific interactions most often provides for approximately one or, rarely, two orders of affinity. According to structural data, DNA binding to any of the investigated enzymes is followed by a stage of DNA conformation adjustment, which includes partial or complete DNA melting, deformation of its backbone, stretching, compression, bending or kinking, eversion of nucleotides from the DNA helix, etc. The full set of such changes is specific for each individual enzyme. The fact that all enzyme-dependent changes in DNA are effected through weak specific (rather than strong) interactions is very important. Enzyme-specific changes in DNA conformation are required for effective adjustment of reacting orbitals to an accuracy of 10°–15°, which is possible only in the case of specific DNAs. A transition from nonspecific to specific DNA leads to an increase in the reaction rate (k _cat) by four to eight orders of magnitude. Thus, the stages of DNA conformation adjustment and catalysis proper provide for the high specificity of enzyme action.     

A detailed study of the substrate specificity of a chimeric restriction enzyme.

Recently, the crystal structure of the designed zinc finger protein, DeltaQNK, bound to a preferred DNA sequence was reported. We have converted DeltaQNK into a novel site-specific endonuclease by linking it to the Fok I cleavage domain (FN). The substrate specificity and DNA cleavage properties of the resulting chimeric restriction enzyme (DeltaQNK-FN) were investigated, and the binding affinities of DeltaQNK and DeltaQNK-FN for various DNA substrates were determined. Substrates that are bound by DeltaQNK with high affinity are the same as those that are cleaved efficiently by DeltaQNK-FN. Substrates bound by DeltaQNK with lower affinity are cleaved with very low efficiency or not at all by DeltaQNK-FN. The binding of DeltaQNK-FN to each substrate was approximately 2-fold weaker than that for DeltaQNK. Thus, the fusion of the Fok I cleavage domain to the zinc finger motif does not change the DNA sequence specificity of the zinc finger protein and does not change its binding affinity significantly.     

The site of binding of linker histone to the nucleosome does not depend upon the amino termini of core histones.

Using nucleosomes reconstituted on a defined sequence of DNA, we have investigated the question as to whether the N-terminal tails of core histones play a role in determining the site of binding of a linker histone. Reconstitutes used histone cores of three types: intact, lacking the N-terminal H3 tails, or lacking all tails. In each case the same, single defined position for the histone core was observed, using high-resolution mapping. The affinity for binding of linker histone H1(o) was highest for the intact cores, lowest for the tailless cores. However, the location of the linker histone, as judged by micrococcal nuclease protection, was exactly the same in each case, an asymmetric site of about 17 bp to one side of the core particle DNA.     

Relationship between folding and function in a sequence-specific miniature DNA-binding protein

Previously, we have described a miniature protein-based approach to the design of molecules that bind DNA or protein surfaces with high affinity and specificity. In this approach, the small, well-folded protein avian pancreatic polypeptide acts as a scaffold to present and stabilize an alpha-helical or PPII-helical recognition epitope. The first miniature protein designed in this way, a molecule called p007, presents the alpha-helical recognition epitope found on the bZIP protein GCN4 and binds DNA with nanomolar affinity and exceptional specificity. In this work we use alanine-scanning mutagenesis to explore the contributions of 29 p007 residues to DNA affinity, specificity, and secondary structure. Virtually every residue within the p007 alpha-helix, and most residues within the p007 PPII helix, contribute to both DNA affinity and specificity. These residues include those introduced to make specific and nonspecific DNA contacts, as well as those that complete the miniature protein core. Moreover, there exists a direct correlation between the affinity of a p007 variant for specific DNA and the ability of that variant to select for specific DNA over nonspecific DNA. Although we observe no correlation between alpha-helicity and affinity, we observe a limited correlation between alpha-helicity and sequence specificity that emphasizes the role of coupled binding/folding in the function of p007. Our results imply that formation of a highly evolved set of protein.DNA contacts in the context of a well-packed hydrophobic core, and not the extent of intrinsic alpha-helical structure, is the primary determinant of p007 function.     

Activity and Specificity of the Bacterial PD-(D/E)XK Homing Endonuclease I-Ssp6803I

The restriction endonuclease fold [a three-layer α-β sandwich containing variations of the PD-(D/E)XK nuclease motif] has been greatly diversified during evolution, facilitating its use for many biological functions. Here we characterize DNA binding and cleavage by the PD-(D/E)XK homing endonuclease I-Ssp6803I. Unlike most restriction endonucleases harboring the same core fold, the specificity profile of this enzyme extends over a long (17 bp) target site. The DNA binding and cleavage specificity profiles of this enzyme were independently determined and found to be highly correlated. However, the DNA target sequence contains several positions where binding and cleavage activities are not tightly coupled: individual DNA base-pair substitutions at those positions that significantly decrease cleavage activity have minor effects on binding affinity. These changes in the DNA target sequence appear to correspond to substitutions that uniquely increase the free energy change between the ground state and the transition state, rather than simply decreasing the overall DNA binding affinity. The specificity of the enzyme reflects constraints on its host gene and limitations imposed by the enzyme's quaternary structure and illustrate the highly diverse repertoire of DNA recognition specificities that can be adopted by the related folds surrounding the PD-(D/E)XK nuclease motif.     

The core histone tail domains contribute to sequence-dependent nucleosome positioning

The precise positioning of nucleosomes plays a critical role in the regulation of gene expression by modulating the DNA binding activity of trans-acting factors. However, molecular determinants responsible for positioning are not well understood. We examined whether the removal of the core histone tail domains from nucleosomes reconstituted with specific DNA fragments led to alteration of translational positions. Remarkably, we find that removal of tail domains from a nucleosome assembled on a DNA fragment containing a Xenopus borealis somatic-type 5S RNA gene results in repositioning of nucleosomes along the DNA, including two related major translational positions that move about 20 bp further upstream with respect to the 5S gene. In a nucleosome reconstituted with a DNA fragment containing the promoter of a Drosophila alcohol dehydrogenase gene, several translational positions shifted by about 10 bp along the DNA upon tail removal. However, the positions of nucleosomes assembled with a DNA fragment known to have one of the highest binding affinities for core histone proteins in the mouse genome were not altered by removal of core histone tail domains. Our data support the notion that the basic tail domains bind to nucleosomal DNA and influence the selection of the translational position of nucleosomes and that once tails are removed movement between translational positions occurs in a facile manner on some sequences. However, the effect of the N-terminal tails on the positioning and movement of a nucleosome appears to be dependent on the DNA sequence such that the contribution of the tails can be masked by very high affinity DNA sequences. Our results suggest a mechanism whereby sequence-dependent nucleosome positioning can be specifically altered by regulated changes in histone tail-DNA interactions in chromatin.     

Balance between DNA‐binding affinity and specificity enables selective recognition of longer target sequences in vivo

Although genome‐editing enzymes such as TALEN and CRISPR/Cas9 are being widely used, they have an essential limitation in that their relatively high‐molecular weight makes them difficult to be delivered to cells. To develop a novel genome‐editing enzyme with a smaller molecular weight, we focused on the engrailed homeodomain (EHD). We designed and constructed proteins composed of two EHDs connected by a linker to increase sequence specificity. In bacterial one‐hybrid assays and electrophoresis mobility shift assay analyses, the created proteins exhibited good affinity for DNA sequences consisting of two tandemly aligned EHD target sequences. However, they also bound to individual EHD targets. To avoid binding to single target sites, we introduced amino acid mutations to reduce the protein–DNA affinity of each EHD monomer and successfully created a small protein with high specificity for tandem EHD target sequences.     

The Yeast a1 and α2 Homeodomain Proteins Do Not Contribute Equally to Heterodimeric DNA Binding

In diploid cells of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the α2 and a1 homeodomain proteins bind cooperatively to sites in the promoters of haploid cell-type-specific genes (hsg) to repress their expression. Although both proteins bind to the DNA, in the α2 homeodomain substitutions of residues that are involved in contacting the DNA have little or no effect on repression in vivo or cooperative DNA binding with a1 protein in vitro. This result brings up the question of the contribution of each protein in the heterodimer complex to the DNA-binding affinity and specificity. To determine the requirements for the a1-α2 homeodomain DNA recognition, we systematically introduced single base-pair substitutions in an a1-α2 DNA-binding site and examined their effects on repression in vivo and DNA binding in vitro. Our results show that nearly all substitutions that significantly decrease repression and DNA-binding affinity are at positions which are specifically contacted by either the α2 or a1 protein. Interestingly, an α2 mutant lacking side chains that make base-specific contacts in the major groove is able to discriminate between the wild-type and mutant DNA sites with the same sequence specificity as the wild-type protein. These results suggest that the specificity of α2 DNA binding in complex with a1 does not rely solely on the residues that make base-specific contacts. We have also examined the contribution of the a1 homeodomain to the binding affinity and specificity of the complex. In contrast to the lack of a defective phenotype produced by mutations in the α2 homeodomain, many of the alanine substitutions of residues in the a1 homeodomain have large effects on a1-α2-mediated repression and DNA binding. This result shows that the two proteins do not make equal contributions to the DNA-binding affinity of the complex.     

Characterization of the minimal DNA binding domain of the human papillomavirus e1 helicase: fluorescence anisotropy studies and characterization of a dimerization-defective mutant protein

The E1 helicase of papillomaviruses is required for replication of the viral double-stranded DNA genome, in conjunction with cellular factors. DNA replication is initiated at the viral origin by the assembly of E1 monomers into oligomeric complexes that have unwinding activity. In vivo, this process is catalyzed by the viral E2 protein, which recruits E1 specifically at the origin. For bovine papillomavirus (BPV) E1 a minimal DNA-binding domain (DBD) has been identified N-terminal to the enzymatic domain. In this study, we characterized the DBD of human papillomavirus 11 (HPV11), HPV18, and BPV E1 using a quantitative DNA binding assay based on fluorescence anisotropy. We found that the HPV11 DBD binds DNA with an affinity and sequence requirement comparable to those of the analogous domain of BPV but that the HPV18 DBD has a higher affinity for nonspecific DNA. By comparing the DNA-binding properties of a dimerization-defective protein to those of the wild type, we provide evidence that dimerization of the HPV11 DBD occurs only on two appropriately positioned E1 binding-sites and contributes approximately a 10-fold increase in binding affinity. In contrast, the HPV11 E1 helicase purified as preformed hexamers binds DNA with little sequence specificity, similarly to a dimerization-defective DBD. Finally, we show that the amino acid substitution that prevents dimerization reduces the ability of a longer E1 protein to bind to the origin in vitro and to support transient HPV DNA replication in vivo, but has little effect on its ATPase activity or ability to oligomerize into hexamers. These results are discussed in light of a model of the assembly of replication-competent double hexameric E1 complexes at the origin.     

Energetics of DNA end binding by E.coli RecBC and RecBCD helicases indicate loop formation in the 3'-single-stranded DNA tail

We examined the equilibrium binding of Escherichia coli RecBC and RecBCD helicases to duplex DNA ends possessing pre-existing single-stranded (ss) DNA ((dT)(n)) tails varying in length (n=0 to 20 nucleotides) in order to determine the contributions of both the 3' and 5' single strands to the energetics of complex formation. Protein binding was monitored by the fluorescence enhancement of a reference DNA labeled at its end with a Cy3 fluorophore. Binding to unlabeled DNA was examined by competition titrations with the Cy3-labeled reference DNA. The affinities of both RecBC and RecBCD increase as the 3'-(dT)(n) tail length increases from zero to six nucleotides, but then decrease dramatically as the 3'-(dT)(n) tail length increases from six to 20 nucleotides. Isothermal titration calorimetry experiments with RecBC show that the binding enthalpy is negative and increases in magnitude with increasing 3'-(dT)(n) tail length up to n=6 nucleotides, but remains constant for n > or =6. Hence, the decrease in binding affinity for 3'-(dT)(n) tail lengths with n > or =6 is due to an unfavorable entropic contribution. RecBC binds optimally to duplex DNA with (dT)6 tails on both the 3' and 5'-ends while RecBCD prefers duplex DNA with 3'-(dT)6 and 5'-(dT)10 tails. These data suggest that both RecBC and RecBCD helicases can destabilize or "melt out" six base-pairs upon binding to a blunt DNA duplex end in the absence of ATP. These results also provide the first evidence that a loop in the 3'-ssDNA tail can form upon binding of RecBC or RecBCD with DNA duplexes containing a pre-formed 3'-ssDNA tail with n > or =6 nucleotides. Such loops may be representative of those hypothesized to form upon interaction of a Chi site contained within the unwound 3' ss-DNA tail with the RecC subunit during DNA unwinding.     

Fusion tails for the recovery and purification of recombinant proteins.

Several fusion tail systems have been developed to promote efficient recovery and purification of recombinant proteins from crude cell extracts or culture media. In these systems, a target protein is genetically engineered to contain a C- or N-terminal polypeptide tail, which provides the biochemical basis for specificity in recovery and purification. Tails with a variety of characteristics have been used: (1) entire enzymes with affinity for immobilized substrates or inhibitors; (2) peptide-binding proteins with affinity to immunoglobulin G or albumin; (3) carbohydrate-binding proteins or domains; (4) a biotin-binding domain for in vivo biotination promoting affinity of the fusion protein to avidin or streptavidin; (5) antigenic epitopes with affinity to immobilized monoclonal antibodies; (6) charged amino acids for use in charge-based recovery methods; (7) poly(His) residues for recovery by immobilized metal affinity chromatography; and (8) other poly(amino acid)s, with binding specificities based on properties of the amino acid side chain. Fusion tails are useful at the lab scale and have potential for enhancing recovery using economical recovery methods that are easily scaled up for industrial downstream processing. Fusion tails can be used to promote secretion of target proteins and can also provide useful assay tags based on enzymatic activity or antibody binding. Many fusion tails do not interfere with the biological activity of the target protein and in some cases have been shown to stabilize it. Nevertheless, for the purification of authentic proteins a site for specific cleavage is often included, allowing removal of the tail after recovery.     

DNA sequence-dependent contributions of core histone tails to nucleosome stability: differential effects of acetylation and proteolytic tail removal

Modulation of nucleosome stability in chromatin plays an important role in eukaryotic gene expression. The core histone N-terminal tail domains are believed to modulate the stability of wrapping nucleosomal DNA and the stability of the chromatin filament. We analyzed the contribution of the tail domains to the stability of nucleosomes containing selected DNA sequences that are intrinsically straight, curved, flexible, or inflexible. We find that the presence of the histone tail domains stabilizes nucleosomes containing DNA sequences that are intrinsically straight or curved. However, the tails do not significantly contribute to the free energy of nucleosome formation with flexible DNA. Interestingly, hyperacetylation of the core histone tail domains does not recapitulate the effect of tail removal by limited proteolysis with regard to nucleosome stability. We find that acetylation of the tails has the same minor effect on nucleosome stability for all the selected DNA sequences. A comparison of histone partitioning between long donor chromatin, acceptor DNA, and free histones in solution shows that the core histone tails mediate internucleosomal interactions within an H1-depleted chromatin fiber amounting to an average free energy of about 1 kcal/mol. Thus, such interactions would be significant with regard to the free energies of sequence-dependent nucleosome positioning. Last, we analyzed the contribution of the H2A/H2B dimers to nucleosome stability. We find that the intact nucleosome is stabilized by 900 cal/mol by the presence of the dimers regardless of sequence. The biological implications of these observations are discussed.