Heterogeneity of KRAS Mutation Status in Rectal Cancer

IntroductionAnti-EGFR targeted therapy is of increasing importance in advanced colorectal cancer and prior KRAS mutation testing is mandatory for therapy. However, at which occasions this should be performed is still under debate. We aimed to assess in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer whether there is intra-specimen KRAS heterogeneity prior to and upon preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT), and if there are any changes in KRAS mutation status due to this intervention.ResultsFor 20 (43%) out of the 47 patients, a KRAS mutation was detected. With 12 out of 20, the majority of these mutations affected codon 35. We did not obtained evidence that CRT results in changes of the KRAS mutation pattern. In addition, no intratumoral heterogeneity in the KRAS mutational status could be proven. This was true for both the biopsies prior to CRT and the resection specimens thereafter. The discrepancy observed in some samples when using the SNaPshot™ assay was due to insufficient sensitivity of this technique upon massive tumor regression by CRT as application of the therascreen® KRAS test revealed concordant results.ConclusionOur results indicate that the KRAS mutation status at the primary tumor site of rectal cancer is homogenous. Its assessment for therapeutic decisions is feasible in pre-therapeutic biopsies as well as in post-therapeutic resected specimens. The amount of viable tumor cells seems to be an important determinant for assay sensitivity and should thus be considered for selection of the analytical method.     

Distinct Clinicopathological Patterns of Mismatch Repair Status in Colorectal Cancer Stratified by KRAS Mutations

In sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC), the BRAF^V600E mutation is associated with deficient mismatch repair (MMR) status and inversely associated with to KRAS mutations. In contrast to deficient MMR (dMMR) CRC, data on the presence of KRAS oncogenic mutations in proficient MMR (pMMR) CRC and their relationship with tumor progression are scarce. We therefore examined the MMR status in combination with KRAS mutations in 913 Chinese patients and correlated the findings obtained with clinical and pathological features. The MMR status was determined based on detection of MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2 expression. KRAS mutation and dMMR status were detected in 36.9% and 7.5% of cases, respectively. Four subtypes were determined by MMR and KRAS mutation status: KRAS (+)/pMMR (34.0%), KRAS (+)/dMMR (2.9%), KRAS (-)/pMMR (58.5%) and KRAS (-)/dMMR (4.6%). A higher percentage of pMMR tumors with KRAS mutation were most likely to be female (49.0%), proximal located (45.5%), a mucinous histology (38.4%), and to have increased lymph node metastasis (60.3%), compared with pMMR tumors without BRAF^V600E and KRAS mutations (36.0%, 29.3%, 29.4% and 50.7%, respectively; all P < 0.01). To the contrary, compared with those with KRAS(-)/dMMR tumors, patients with KRAS(+)/dMMR tumors demonstrated no statistically significant differences in gender, tumor location, pT depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis, pTNM stage, and histologic grade. This study revealed that specific epidemiologic and clinicopathologic characteristics are associated with MMR status stratified by KRAS mutation. Knowledge of MMR and KRAS mutation status may enhance molecular pathologic staging of CRC patients and metastatic progression in CRC can be estimated based on the combination of these biomarkers.     

KRAS and BRAF mutation analysis can be reliably performed on aspirated cytological specimens of metastatic colorectal carcinoma

N. K. B. Pang, M. E. Nga, S. Y. Chin, T.‐M. Ismail, G. L. Lim, R. Soong and M. Salto‐Tellez
KRAS and BRAF mutation analysis can be reliably performed on aspirated cytological specimens of metastatic colorectal carcinoma Background: Sanger sequencing is one of several reliable methods in use to detect KRAS and BRAF mutations to facilitate clinical patient selection for anti‐epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody therapy in unresectable metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRC). Most analyses are made on pretreatment biopsy or resection specimens. There is a scarcity of published studies on the suitability of cytological samples for KRAS testing in this setting. Methods: DNA extraction was attempted on 11 search‐retrieved paired cases of histological resections or excisions of CRC and their corresponding cytological samples (representing metastases) and tested for KRAS mutations in exon 2 and 3, as well as BRAF exon 15 mutations by Sanger sequencing. Only KRAS wild‐type cases were subjected to BRAF analysis because this is the setting with true diagnostic value, as these mutations are mutually exclusive. Results: Of the 11 paired cases analysed, only eight histology cases showed satisfactory DNA quality for sequencing. Thus, only eight of the corresponding cytology cases were analysed. Seven of the eight cases tested showed the same KRAS genotype on both the aspirated cytology specimen of metastatic carcinoma and the primary tumour (histological specimen), from which we derive an overall concordance rate of 87.5%. The single discordant case was likely to be a true difference as it was demonstrated again on repeat testing of both samples. No BRAF mutations were detected on the four KRAS wild‐type cases. Conclusion: A range of cytological samples are suitable for KRAS and BRAF mutation testing, be it from previously stained preparations or cell blocks. These samples would be highly valuable in cases where cytological samples are the only material available for mutation testing.     

EGF-Induced Acetylation of Heterogeneous Nuclear Ribonucleoproteins Is Dependent on KRAS Mutational Status in Colorectal Cancer Cells

KRAS mutational status is considered a negative predictive marker of the response to anti-EGFR therapies in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. However, conflicting data exist regarding the variable response to EGFR-targeted therapy. The effects of oncogenic KRAS on downstream targets were studied in cell lines with different KRAS mutations. Cells harboring a single KRAS^G13D allele showed the most tumorigenic profile, with constitutive activation of the downstream pathway, rendering them EGF-unresponsive. Conversely, KRAS^A146T cells showed a full EGF-response in terms of signal transduction pathways, cell proliferation, migration or adhesion. Moreover, the global acetylome of CRC cells was also dependent on KRAS mutational status. Several hnRNP family members were identified within the 36 acetylated-proteins. Acetylation status is known to be involved in the modulation of EGF-response. In agreement with results presented herein, hnRNPA1 and L acetylation was induced in response to EGF in KRAS^A146T cells, whereas acetyl-hnRNPA1 and L levels remained unchanged after growth factor treatment in KRAS^G13D unresponsive cells. Our results showed that hnRNPs induced-acetylation is dependent on KRAS mutational status. Nevertheless hnRNPs acetylation might also be the point where different oncogenic pathways converge.     

Molecular Subgroup Analysis of Clinical Outcomes in a Phase 3 Study of Gemcitabine and Oxaliplatin with or without Erlotinib in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer

BACKGROUND: We previously reported that the addition of erlotinib to gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) resulted in greater antitumor activity and might be a treatment option for patients with biliary tract cancers (BTCs). Molecular subgroup analysis of treatment outcomes in patients who had specimens available for analysis was undertaken. METHODS: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), KRAS, and PIK3CA mutations were evaluated using peptide nucleic acid–locked nucleic acid polymerase chain reaction clamp reactions. Survival and response rates (RRs) were analyzed according to the mutational status. Sixty-four patients (48.1%) were available for mutational analysis in the chemotherapy alone group and 61 (45.1%) in the chemotherapy plus erlotinib group. RESULTS: 1.6% (2/116) harbored an EGFR mutation (2 patients; exon 20), 9.6% (12/121) harbored a KRAS mutation (12 patients; exon 2), and 9.6% (12/118) harbored a PIK3CA mutation (10 patients, exon 9 and 2 patients, exon 20). The addition of erlotinib to GEMOX in patients with KRAS wild-type disease (n = 109) resulted in significant improvements in overall response compared with GEMOX alone (30.2% vs 12.5%, P = .024). In 95 patients with both wild-type KRAS and PIK3CA, there was evidence of a benefit associated with the addition of erlotinib to GEMOX with respect to RR as compared with GEMOX alone (P = .04). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that KRAS mutational status might be considered a predictive biomarker for the response to erlotinib in BTCs. Additionally, the mutation status of PIK3CA may be a determinant for adding erlotinib to chemotherapy in KRAS wild-type BTCs.     

p.G12C KRAS mutation prevalence in non-small cell lung cancer: Contribution from interregional variability and population substructures among Hispanics

BackgroundThe KRAS exon 2 p. G12C mutation in patients with lung adenocarcinoma has been increasing in relevance due to the development and effectiveness of new treatment medications. Studies around different populations indicate that regional variability between ethnic groups and ancestries could play an essential role in developing this molecular alteration within lung cancer.MethodsIn a prospective and retrospective cohort study on samples from lung adenocarcinoma from 1000 patients from different administrative regions in Colombia were tested for the KRAS p.G12C mutation. An analysis of STR populations markers was conducted to identify substructure contributions to mutation prevalence.ResultsIncluded were 979 patients with a national mean frequency for the KRAS exon 2 p.G12C mutation of 7.97% (95%CI 6.27–9.66%). Variation between regions was also identified with Antioquia reaching a positivity value of 12.7% (95%CI 9.1–16.3%) in contrast to other regions such as Bogota DC (Capital region) with 5.4% (2.7–8.2%) and Bolivar with 2.4% (95%CI 0–7.2%) (p-value = 0.00262). Furthermore, Short tandem repeat population substructures were found for eight markers that strongly yielded association with KRAS exon 2 p.G12C frequency reaching an adjusted R2 of 0.945 and a p-value of < 0.0001.ConclusionsWidespread identification of KRAS exon 2 p.G12C mutations, especially in cases where NGS is not easily achieved is feasible at a population based level that can characterize regional and national patterns of mutation status. Furthermore, this type of mutation prevalence follows a population substructure pattern that can be easily determined by population and ancestral markers such as STR.     

High sensitivity of both sequencing and real‐time PCR analysis of KRAS mutations in colorectal cancer tissue

The KRAS mutation status predicts the outcome of treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor targeted agents, and therefore the testing for KRAS mutations has become an important diagnostic procedure. To optimize the quality of this test, we compared the results of the two most commonly used KRAS mutation tests, cycle sequencing and a real‐time PCR‐based assay, in DNA extracted from formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded (FFPE) colorectal cancer samples of 511 patients. The results were interpreted in the context of the tumour cell percentage and the assay parameters. In 510 samples KRAS mutation status assessment was successful. A KRAS mutation was detected in 201 tumours (39.4%). Sequencing and the real‐time PCR‐based assay generated the same result in 486 samples (95.3%). The sequencing result was considered false positive in one (0.2%) and false negative in nine samples (1.8%). The assay result was considered false positive in six (1.2%) and false negative in seven samples (1.4%). Explanations for discrepant test results were a higher sensitivity of the assay in samples with a low tumour cell percentage, occurrence of mutations that are not covered by the assay and δ Ct values approximating the cut‐off value of the assay. In conclusion, both sequencing and the real‐time PCR‐based assay are reliable tests for KRAS mutation analysis in FFPE colorectal cancer samples, with a sensitivity of 95.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 91.7–97.9%) and 96.5% (95% CI 93.0–98.6%), respectively. The real‐time PCR based assay is the method of choice in samples with a tumour cell percentage below 30%.     

<Emphasis Type="Italic">PIK3CA</Emphasis> mutations in <Emphasis Type="Italic">KRAS</Emphasis> and <Emphasis Type="Italic">BRAF</Emphasis> wild type colorectal cancer patients. A study of Spanish population

The objective of the work was to study PIK3CA mutations in wild type KRAS and BRAF colorectal cancer. Clinicopathological data and paraffin-embedded specimens were collected on 73 patients who underwent colorectal resections at General Yagüe Hospital in Burgos. KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA status were analyzed by real-time PCR in all patients. PIK3CA mutations were present in 8.22% of wild type KRAS and BRAF colorectal cancers. The most frequent mutation is E545K/D in exon 9 which represents 83.3% of all mutations. By contrast, we did not found any tumour harbouring H1047R mutation in exon 20. Among the patients who undergo a curative resection of colorectal cancer, PIK3CA mutation is present in an important percentage of KRAS and BRAF wild type tumours. PIK3CA mutation may be considered as it could be a hypothetic reason to be not responder to anti-EGFR antibodies.     

Reduced HRASG12V-Driven Tumorigenesis of Cell Lines Expressing KRASC118S

In many different human cancers, one of the HRAS, NRAS, or KRAS genes in the RAS family of small GTPases acquires an oncogenic mutation that renders the encoded protein constitutively GTP-bound and thereby active, which is well established to promote tumorigenesis. In addition to oncogenic mutations, accumulating evidence suggests that the wild-type isoforms may also be activated and contribute to oncogenic RAS-driven tumorigenesis. In this regard, redox-dependent reactions with cysteine 118 (C118) have been found to promote activation of wild-type HRAS and NRAS. We sought to determine if this residue is also important for the activation of wild-type KRAS and promotion of tumorigenesis. Thus, we mutated C118 to serine (C118S) in wild-type KRAS to block redox-dependent reactions at this site. We now report that this mutation reduced the level of GTP-bound KRAS and impaired RAS signaling stimulated by the growth factor EGF. With regards to tumorigenesis, we also report that oncogenic HRAS-transformed human cells in which endogenous KRAS was knocked down and replaced with KRAS^C118S exhibited reduced xenograft tumor growth, as did oncogenic HRAS-transformed Kras^C118S/C118S murine cells in which the C118S mutation was knocked into the endogenous Kras gene. Taken together, these data suggest a role for redox-dependent activation of wild-type KRAS through C118 in oncogenic HRAS-driven tumorigenesis.     

Proteomic Analysis of Exosomes from Mutant KRAS Colon Cancer Cells Identifies Intercellular Transfer of Mutant KRAS

Activating mutations in KRAS occur in 30% to 40% of colorectal cancers. How mutant KRAS alters cancer cell behavior has been studied intensively, but non-cell autonomous effects of mutant KRAS are less understood. We recently reported that exosomes isolated from mutant KRAS-expressing colon cancer cells enhanced the invasiveness of recipient cells relative to exosomes purified from wild-type KRAS-expressing cells, leading us to hypothesize mutant KRAS might affect neighboring and distant cells by regulating exosome composition and behavior. Herein, we show the results of a comprehensive proteomic analysis of exosomes from parental DLD-1 cells that contain both wild-type and G13D mutant KRAS alleles and isogenically matched derivative cell lines, DKO-1 (mutant KRAS allele only) and DKs-8 (wild-type KRAS allele only). Mutant KRAS status dramatically affects the composition of the exosome proteome. Exosomes from mutant KRAS cells contain many tumor-promoting proteins, including KRAS, EGFR, SRC family kinases, and integrins. DKs-8 cells internalize DKO-1 exosomes, and, notably, DKO-1 exosomes transfer mutant KRAS to DKs-8 cells, leading to enhanced three-dimensional growth of these wild-type KRAS-expressing non-transformed cells. These results have important implications for non-cell autonomous effects of mutant KRAS, such as field effect and tumor progression.K-RAS (KRAS) is a small, monomeric GTPase whose biological activity is specified by its nucleotide binding state. Multiple lines of evidence highlight the importance of KRAS in colorectal cancer (CRC).¹ For example, activating missense mutations in KRAS, which lock the protein into the GTP-bound state, occur in 30% to 40% of CRCs and are strongly associated with poor prognosis (1, 2). Also, mutant KRAS negatively predicts responsiveness to anti-EGF receptor (EGFR) therapy (3).Early attempts to decipher the neoplastic consequences of mutant KRAS relied on overexpression studies. A drawback of these studies is their failure to simulate the genetic conditions present in human tumors, where there is often one wild-type (WT) and one mutant KRAS allele (1). More recently, KRAS mutant CRC cell lines have been engineered to selectively contain either the wild-type or the mutant KRAS allele (4), and a single mutant Kras allele has been activated in the intestine using genetically engineered mice (5). Detailed studies using these complementary approaches demonstrate a wide range of tumor-promoting effects of mutant KRAS (reviewed in Ref. 6). Much of what is known about mutant KRAS pertains to its ability to alter the behavior of a transformed cell in a cell autonomous manner. With the exception of increased tumor vascularity via increased tumor-derived VEGF expression (7, 8), non-cell autonomous effects of mutant KRAS have been much less studied.Exosomes are 30- to 100-nm secreted vesicles that have emerged as a novel mode of intercellular communication (9). We recently reported that exosomes purified from conditioned medium of mutant KRAS CRC cells contained higher levels of the EGFR ligand amphiregulin (AREG) and enhanced invasiveness of recipient cancer cells relative to exosomes from isogenically matched wild-type KRAS cells (10). These results prompted us to perform a comprehensive analysis of exosomes purified from these cells. Herein, we show that mutant KRAS induces many changes in exosomal protein composition. Notably, we show that (i) KRAS is contained within exosomes, (ii) exosomes can transfer mutant KRAS to cells expressing only wild-type KRAS, and (iii) mutant KRAS-containing exosomes enhance wild-type KRAS cell growth in collagen matrix and soft agar. These results have important implications for the progression of CRC tumors by providing a mechanism by which the tumor microenvironment may be influenced by non-cell autonomous signals released by mutant KRAS-expressing tumor cells.     

The epithelial polarity regulator LGALS9/galectin-9 induces fatal frustrated autophagy in KRAS mutant colon carcinoma that depends on elevated basal autophagic flux

Oncogenic mutation of KRAS (Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog) in colorectal cancer (CRC) confers resistance to both chemotherapy and EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor)-targeted therapy. We uncovered that KRAS mutant (KRAS^mut) CRC is uniquely sensitive to treatment with recombinant LGALS9/Galectin-9 (rLGALS9), a recently established regulator of epithelial polarity. Upon treatment of CRC cells, rLGALS9 rapidly internalizes via early- and late-endosomes and accumulates in the lysosomal compartment. Treatment with rLGALS9 is accompanied by induction of frustrated autophagy in KRAS^mut CRC, but not in CRC with BRAF (B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase) mutations (BRAF^mut). In KRAS^mut CRC, rLGALS9 acts as a lysosomal inhibitor that inhibits autophagosome-lysosome fusion, leading to autophagosome accumulation, excessive lysosomal swelling and cell death. This antitumor activity of rLGALS9 directly correlates with elevated basal autophagic flux in KRAS^mut cancer cells. Thus, rLGALS9 has potent antitumor activity toward refractory KRAS^mut CRC cells that may be exploitable for therapeutic use.     

Efficient Genotyping of KRAS Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Using a Multiplexed Droplet Digital PCR Approach

Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) can be used to detect low frequency mutations in oncogene-driven lung cancer. The range of KRAS point mutations observed in NSCLC necessitates a multiplex approach to efficient mutation detection in circulating DNA. Here we report the design and optimisation of three discriminatory ddPCR multiplex assays investigating nine different KRAS mutations using PrimePCR™ ddPCR™ Mutation Assays and the Bio-Rad QX100 system. Together these mutations account for 95% of the nucleotide changes found in KRAS in human cancer. Multiplex reactions were optimised on genomic DNA extracted from KRAS mutant cell lines and tested on DNA extracted from fixed tumour tissue from a cohort of lung cancer patients without prior knowledge of the specific KRAS genotype. The multiplex ddPCR assays had a limit of detection of better than 1 mutant KRAS molecule in 2,000 wild-type KRAS molecules, which compared favourably with a limit of detection of 1 in 50 for next generation sequencing and 1 in 10 for Sanger sequencing. Multiplex ddPCR assays thus provide a highly efficient methodology to identify KRAS mutations in lung adenocarcinoma.     

p120RasGAP Is a Mediator of Rho Pathway Activation and Tumorigenicity in the DLD1 Colorectal Cancer Cell Line

KRAS is mutated in ∼40% of colorectal cancer (CRC), and there are limited effective treatments for advanced KRAS mutant CRC. Therefore, it is crucial that downstream mediators of oncogenic KRAS continue to be studied. We identified p190RhoGAP as being phosphorylated in the DLD1 CRC cell line, which expresses a heterozygous KRAS G13D allele, and not in DKO4 in which the mutant allele has been deleted by somatic recombination. We found that a ubiquitous binding partner of p190RhoGAP, p120RasGAP (RasGAP), is expressed in much lower levels in DKO4 cells compared to DLD1, and this expression is regulated by KRAS. Rescue of RasGAP expression in DKO4 rescued Rho pathway activation and partially rescued tumorigenicity in DKO4 cells, indicating that the combination of mutant KRAS and RasGAP expression is crucial to these phenotypes. We conclude that RasGAP is an important effector of mutant KRAS in CRC.     

Measuring KRAS Mutations in Circulating Tumor DNA by Droplet Digital PCR and Next-Generation Sequencing

Measuring total cell-free DNA (cfDNA) or cancer-specific mutations herein has presented as new tools in aiding the treatment of cancer patients. Studies show that total cfDNA bears prognostic value in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and that measuring cancer-specific mutations could supplement biopsies. However, limited information is available on the performance of different methods. Blood samples from 28 patients with mCRC and known KRAS mutation status were included. cfDNA was extracted and quantified with droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) measuring Beta-2 Microglobulin. KRAS mutation detection was performed using ddPCR (Bio-Rad) and next-generation sequencing (NGS, Ion Torrent PGM). Comparing KRAS mutation status in plasma and tissue revealed concordance rates of 79% and 89% for NGS and ddPCR. Strong correlation between the methods was observed. Most KRAS mutations were also detectable in 10-fold diluted samples using the ddPCR. We find that for detection of KRAS mutations in ctDNA ddPCR was superior to NGS both in analysis success rate and concordance to tissue. We further present results indicating that lower amount of plasma may be used for detection of KRAS mutations in mCRC.     

Zebrafish model of KRAS-initiated pancreatic endocrine tumor

Pancreatic cancer constitutes a genetic disease in which somatic mutations in the KRAS proto-oncogene are detected in 95% of cases. Activation of the KRAS proto-oncogene represents an initiating event in pancreatic tumorigenesis. Here, we established a zebrafish pancreatic neoplasia model that recapitulates human pancreatic tumors. Toward this end, we generated a stable CRE/Lox-based zebrafish model system to express oncogenic KRAS^G12D  in the elastase3I domain of the zebrafish pancreas. Lineage tracing experiments showed that early KRAS^G12D -responsive pancreatic progenitors contribute to endocrine in addition to exocrine cells. In this system, 10% and 40% of zebrafish developed pancreatic tumors by 6 and 12 months, respectively. The histological profiles of these experimental tumors bore a striking resemblance to those of pancreatic endocrine tumors. Immunohistochemical analysis including the endocrine cell-specific marker confirmed the pancreatic tumor region as a characteristic endocrine tumor. Taken together, our zebrafish model data revealed that pancreatic endocrine tumors originate from early KRAS^G12D -responsive pancreatic progenitor cells. These findings demonstrated that this zebrafish model may be suitable as an experimental and preclinical system to evaluate different strategies for targeting pancreatic endocrine tumors and ultimately improve the outcome for patients with pancreatic endocrine tumors.     

<Emphasis Type="Italic">KRAS</Emphasis>, <Emphasis Type="Italic">BRAF</Emphasis>, <Emphasis Type="Italic">EGFR</Emphasis> and <Emphasis Type="Italic">HER2</Emphasis> gene status in a Spanish population of colorectal cancer

To evaluate the KRAS, BRAF, EGFR, and HER2 gene status in colorectal cancer by novel techniques and evaluate whether anti-HER2 therapies could be offered in the treatment of these patients. There are conflicting data on the prevalence of BRAF mutations and EGFR and HER2 gene amplification in colorectal KRAS wild type patients. In our study we tried to evaluate these expressions and their relationship to future treatment assays. Clinical–pathological data and paraffin-embedded specimens were collected from 186 patients who underwent colorectal resections at General Yagüe Hospital in Burgos, Spain. KRAS and BRAF status was analyzed by real-time PCR in all patients. EGFR and HER2/NEU gene amplification was detected using fluorescent in situ hybridisation technique (FISH) in 38 KRAS and BRAF wild type patients. KRAS mutations were present in 48% of the colorectal cancer patients. BRAF mutations were present in 6.25% of the KRAS wild type patients. EGFR and HER2 gene amplification was observed in 5.3% and 26.3%, respectively, of KRAS and BRAF wild type colorectal cancer patients. HER2, but not EGFR gene amplification, was frequently observed in KRAS and BRAF wild type colorectal cancer patients. These data indicate that HER2 amplification could be one of the genes to be considered in the therapeutic management of colorectal cancer.     

Pyrosequencing method to detect KRAS mutation in formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tumor tissues

KRAS mutation status has been reported to be a predictive marker of tumor response to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors. We have designed a pyrosequencing assay based on nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to characterize KRAS mutation status using formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tumor tissues. Mutant and wild-type KRAS cell lines were used to determine the specificity and sensitivity (detection limit ∼5% mutant alleles) of the method. The results obtained for tumor samples were 95% comparable to those obtained by dideoxy sequencing. Analysis of KRAS mutation using nested PCR and pyrosequencing is a simple, robust, fast, and sensitive method that can be used with formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissues.     

Spectrum of EGFR Gene Copy Number Changes and KRAS Gene Mutation Status in Korean Triple Negative Breast Cancer Patients

Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy has been tried in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients without evaluation of molecular and clinical predictors in several randomized clinical studies. Only fewer than 20% of metastatic TNBCs showed response to anti-EGFR therapy. In order to increase the overall response rate, first step would be to classify TNBC into good or poor responders according to oncogenic mutation profiles. This study provides the molecular characteristics of TNBCs including EGFR gene copy number changes and mutation status of EGFR and KRAS gene in Korean TNBC patients. Mutation analysis for EGFR, KRAS, BRAF and TP53 from a total of 105 TNBC tissue samples was performed by direct sequencing, peptide nucleic acid-mediated PCR clamping method and real-time PCR. Copy number changes of EGFR gene were evaluated using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. Out of all 105 TNBCs, 15.2% (16/105) showed EGFR copy number changes. Among them, increased or decreased EGFR copy number was detected in 13 (5 single copy gain, 2 amplification and 4 high-copy number amplification) and 3 cases (3 hemizygous deletion), respectively. The mutation frequencies of KRAS, EGFR and TP53 gene were 1.9% (G12V and G12D), 1.0% (exon 19 del) and 31.4%, respectively. There was no BRAF V600E mutation found. Future studies are needed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of TNBC patients who undergo anti-EGFR therapy according to the genetic status of EGFR.