Expression of Xylella fastidiosa Fimbrial and Afimbrial Proteins during Biofilm Formation

Complete sequencing of the Xylella fastidiosa genome revealed characteristics that have not been described previously for a phytopathogen. One characteristic of this genome was the abundance of genes encoding proteins with adhesion functions related to biofilm formation, an essential step for colonization of a plant host or an insect vector. We examined four of the proteins belonging to this class encoded by genes in the genome of X. fastidiosa: the PilA2 and PilC fimbrial proteins, which are components of the type IV pili, and XadA1 and XadA2, which are afimbrial adhesins. Polyclonal antibodies were raised against these four proteins, and their behavior during biofilm development was assessed by Western blotting and immunofluorescence assays. In addition, immunogold electron microscopy was used to detect these proteins in bacteria present in xylem vessels of three different hosts (citrus, periwinkle, and hibiscus). We verified that these proteins are present in X. fastidiosa biofilms but have differential regulation since the amounts varied temporally during biofilm formation, as well as spatially within the biofilms. The proteins were also detected in bacteria colonizing the xylem vessels of infected plants.Aggregative growth is a common feature in the microbial world, and its discovery radically changed our concept of microbial growth dynamics. A cellular aggregate adhering to a surface is known as a biofilm. It has important characteristics, such as greater resistance to antimicrobial compounds (34, 54), increased capacity of the cells to take up nutrients from the environment (59), and higher detoxification efficiency resulting from an increase in expression of genes encoding efflux pumps (43). These characteristics give the biofilm cells a great adaptive advantage.Biofilm growth also confers advantages to plant pathogens by promoting virulence and protection against plant defense responses. Bacteria can colonize different niches in the plant, from aerial surfaces to roots and the vascular system, and biofilm formation can play a role at all of these sites of colonization. In the vessels, biofilms are very important since the cells need to survive in a competitive habitat where plant defense compounds are produced in response to infection (7).Biofilm development is divided into at least the following five phases: (i) reversible attachment, (ii) irreversible attachment, (iii) beginning of maturation, (iv) mature biofilm, and (v) dispersion (13, 50). In Xylella fastidiosa strain 9a5c, the maturation phase occurs between days 15 and 20 in vitro, while dispersion occurs between days 25 and 30, as observed by our analysis of biofilm formation using different methods, including scanning electron microscopy and quantification of exopolysaccharides, biomass, and the total protein (unpublished data). The establishment and development of biofilms of plant-colonizing bacteria share several features with the establishment and development of biofilms of human bacterial pathogens, such as regulation by quorum sensing, nutrient starvation regulation, and phase variation. Motility is also an important factor not only for the initiation and development of the biofilm but also for dispersion (50). Attachment is mediated by surface-associated structures, which include both polysaccharides and proteins classified as fimbrial and afimbrial adhesins, depending on the structure to which they contribute. Fimbrial adhesins form filamentous structures, while afimbrial adhesins produce projections on the outer membrane (23).X. fastidiosa, a Gram-negative phytopathogen that grows as a biofilms in both plant xylem vessels and the cybarium of insect vectors, is a major threat to plant production around the world. In Brazil, it has a major economic impact on citriculture since it causes citrus variegated chlorosis disease (CVC) (35, 39, 42). The biofilm formed by X. fastidiosa blocks the xylem vessels of susceptible citrus plants, impairing water flow. This blockage leads to a drastic reduction in fruit size (32) and, consequently, severe economic losses resulting from reduced plant productivity (4).Due to the economic damage caused by CVC, there has been a major effort to generate more information about its biology. This led to sequencing of the genome of the pathogen. The X. fastidiosa genome harbors a wide variety of genes encoding adhesins (53). Bacterial cell surface adhesins are important in the initial phases of adherence to surfaces, as well as in bacterium-bacterium interactions and microcolony development (15). Insight into X. fastidiosa has also come from genome analysis of a strain of X. fastidiosa which causes Pierce''s disease of grape (58). Studies of this strain showed that the cellular aggregation process involves type I and type IV fimbrial adhesins. The two types of fimbriae present different adhesion forces that help bacteria adhere to a substrate (10, 30). Adhesion proteins have also been demonstrated to mediate adherence to carbohydrates of leafhopper foregut surfaces (27). In addition, both fimbrial and afimbrial adhesins are important for plant pathogenicity (38, 41). However, the expression of these proteins during X. fastidiosa biofilm formation either in vitro or in planta is still poorly understood. For X. fastidiosa strains causing CVC, nothing is known about the role of these proteins in pathogenicity or biofilm formation, although some adhesion-encoding genes, such as pilA2, pilC, xadA1, and xadA2, were found to be upregulated either in virulent strains of X. fastidiosa or during biofilm formation (12, 14). These results suggest that the biofilm mode of growth is important for successful colonization of the citrus host by X. fastidiosa strains that cause CVC. In this work we focused on the temporal expression of the PilA2 and PilC fimbrial proteins and XadA1 and XadA2, which are afimbrial adhesins, during in vitro development of X. fastidiosa CVC biofilms. We demonstrated that the temporal and spatial patterns of expression of the fimbrial and afimbrial adhesins are very different during biofilm development in vitro. Moreover, we also verified that these adhesins are present in X. fastidiosa cells in symptomatic plants of three different hosts (citrus, periwinkle, and hibiscus).     

Role for Chitin and Chitooligomers in the Capsular Architecture of Cryptococcus neoformans

Molecules composed of β-1,4-linked N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) and deacetylated glucosamine units play key roles as surface constituents of the human pathogenic fungus Cryptococcus neoformans. GlcNAc is the monomeric unit of chitin and chitooligomers, which participate in the connection of capsular polysaccharides to the cryptococcal cell wall. In the present study, we evaluated the role of GlcNAc-containing structures in the assembly of the cryptococcal capsule. The in vivo expression of chitooligomers in C. neoformans varied depending on the infected tissue, as inferred from the differential reactivity of yeast forms to the wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) in infected brain and lungs of rats. Chromatographic and dynamic light-scattering analyses demonstrated that glucuronoxylomannan (GXM), the major cryptococcal capsular component, interacts with chitin and chitooligomers. When added to C. neoformans cultures, chitooligomers formed soluble complexes with GXM and interfered in capsular assembly, as manifested by aberrant capsules with defective connections with the cell wall and no reactivity with a monoclonal antibody to GXM. Cultivation of C. neoformans in the presence of an inhibitor of glucosamine 6-phosphate synthase resulted in altered expression of cell wall chitin. These cells formed capsules that were loosely connected to the cryptococcal wall and contained fibers with decreased diameters and altered monosaccharide composition. These results contribute to our understanding of the role played by chitin and chitooligosaccharides on the cryptococcal capsular structure, broadening the functional activities attributed to GlcNAc-containing structures in this biological system.Cryptococcus neoformans is the etiologic agent of cryptococcosis, a disease still characterized by high morbidity and mortality despite antifungal therapy (3). Pathogenic species belonging to the Cryptococcus genus also include Cryptococcus gattii, which causes disease mostly in immunocompetent individuals (24). A unique characteristic of Cryptococcus species is the presence of a polysaccharide capsule, which is essential for virulence (7-9, 19, 25, 33).C. neoformans has a complex cell surface. The thick fungal cell wall is composed of polysaccharides (29), pigments (11), lipids (35), and proteins (36). External to the cryptococcal cell wall, capsular polysaccharides form a capsule (19). Seemingly, the assembly of the surface envelope of C. neoformans requires the interaction of cell wall components with capsular elements. Some of the cryptococcal cell wall-capsule connectors have been identified, including the structural polysaccharide α-1,3-glucan and chitooligomers (29, 30, 32).Chitin-like molecules in fungi are polymerized by chitin synthases, which use cytoplasmic pools of UDP-GlcNAc (N-acetylglucosamine) to form β-1,4-linked oligosaccharides and large polymers. In C. neoformans, the final cellular site of chitin accumulation is the cell wall. The polysaccharide is also used for chitosan synthesis through enzymatic deacetylation (1). Eight putative cryptococcal chitin synthase genes and three regulator proteins have been identified (2). The chitin synthase Chs3 and regulator Csr2 may form a complex with chitin deacetylases for conversion of chitin to chitosan (1). Key early events in the synthesis of chitin/chitosan require the activity of glucosamine 6-phosphate synthase, which promotes the glutamine-dependent amination of fructose 6-phosphate to form glucosamine 6-phosphate, a substrate used for UDP-GlcNAc synthesis (23).In a previous study, we demonstrated that β-1,4-linked GlcNAc oligomers, which are specifically recognized by the wheat germ agglutinin (WGA), form bridge-like connections between the cell wall and the capsule of C. neoformans (32). In fact, other reports indicate that molecules composed of GlcNAc or its deacetylated derivative play key roles in C. neoformans structural biology. For example, mutations in the genes responsible for the expression of chitin synthase 3 or of the biosynthetic regulator Csr2p caused the loss of the ability to retain the virulence-related pigment melanin in the cell wall (1, 2). These cells were also defective in the synthesis of chitosan, which has also been demonstrated to regulate the retention of cell wall melanin (1). Treatment of C. neoformans acapsular mutants with chitinase affected the incorporation of capsular components into the cell wall (32). Considering that melanin and capsular components are crucial for virulence, these results strongly suggest that GlcNAc-derived molecules are key components of the C. neoformans cell surface. The expression of GlcNAc-containing molecules is likely to be modulated during infection since chitinase expression by host cells is induced during lung cryptococcosis (37).In this study, we used β-1,4-linked GlcNAc oligomers and an inhibitor of UDP-GlcNAc synthesis to evaluate the role played by GlcNAc-containing molecules in the surface architecture of C. neoformans. The results point to a direct relationship between the expression of GlcNAc-containing molecules and capsular assembly, indicating that chitin and chitooligomers are required for capsule organization in C. neoformans.     

Chitinases Are Essential for Sexual Development but Not Vegetative Growth in Cryptococcus neoformans

Cryptococcus neoformans is an opportunistic pathogen that mainly infects immunocompromised individuals. The fungal cell wall of C. neoformans is an excellent target for antifungal therapies since it is an essential organelle that provides cell structure and integrity. Importantly, it is needed for localization or attachment of known virulence factors, including melanin, phospholipase, and the polysaccharide capsule. The polysaccharide fraction of the cryptococcal cell wall is a complex structure composed of chitin, chitosan, and glucans. Chitin is an indispensable component of many fungal cell walls that contributes significantly to cell wall strength and integrity. Fungal cell walls are very dynamic, constantly changing during cell division and morphogenesis. Hydrolytic enzymes, such as chitinases, have been implicated in the maintenance of cell wall plasticity and separation of the mother and daughter cells at the bud neck during vegetative growth in yeast. In C. neoformans we identified four predicted endochitinases, CHI2, CHI21, CHI22, and CHI4, and a predicted exochitinase, hexosaminidase, HEX1. Enzymatic analysis indicated that Chi2, Chi22, and Hex1 actively degraded chitinoligomeric substrates. Chi2 and Hex1 activity was associated mostly with the cellular fraction, and Chi22 activity was more prominent in the supernatant. The enzymatic activity of Hex1 increased when grown in media containing only N-acetylglucosamine as a carbon source, suggesting that its activity may be inducible by chitin degradation products. Using a quadruple endochitinase deletion strain, we determined that the endochitinases do not affect the growth or morphology of C. neoformans during asexual reproduction. However, mating assays indicated that Chi2, Chi21, and Chi4 are each involved in sexual reproduction. In summary, the endochitinases were found to be dispensable for routine vegetative growth but not sexual reproduction.Cryptococcus neoformans is an opportunistic fungal pathogen that causes cryptococcosis in immunocompromised individuals. The incidence of cryptococcosis continues to rise in direct proportion to the spread of the human immunodeficiency virus (for review, see Casadevall and Perfect [7]). It is estimated that up to 13% of AIDS patients in the United States will develop life-threatening cryptococcal meningitis, and in some parts of Africa this estimate increases to 40% (7). Current antifungal therapies for treatment of cryptococcosis are inadequate. Amphotericin B, which is believed to interact with membrane sterols (ergosterol) to produce an aggregate that forms a transmembrane channel is effective, but toxic (50, 62). Fluconazole inhibits cytochrome P-450-dependent 14α-sterol demethylase, which leads to the depletion of ergosterol and the accumulation of sterol precursors and results in the formation of a plasma membrane with altered structure and function. It is fungistatic and has high relapse rates (18, 41, 42, 50, 62). Flucytosine can be toxic and resistance occurs frequently (9, 41, 42, 50, 62). The newest class of antifungals to emerge is the echinocandins that targets an essential fungal enzyme required for the synthesis of a β-(1,3)-glucan in the fungal cell wall (17, 34). In addition, the echinocandins have been shown to be safe and effective for treatment of specific fungal infections, including candidiasis and aspergillosis caused by Candida albicans and Aspergillus fumigatus, respectively (23, 59). However, even though C. neoformans possesses the target enzyme β-(1,3)-glucan synthase and in vitro assays have shown the enzyme''s activity to be inhibited by the echinocandin caspofungin (34), C. neoformans still exhibits resistance to this class of drugs (26).Because fungi are eukaryotes and share many biochemical processes with their host, antifungal drug design has been problematic. The cell wall is a prominent structure that differentiates fungi from mammalian host cells. For all fungi, this organelle is essential and provides structure as well as integrity; thus, the cell wall components or their biosynthetic pathways make attractive drug targets. In addition, the cell wall of C. neoformans is associated with a variety of known virulence factors that are important for host-pathogen interactions, and it contains polymers including chitin and chitosan that are necessary for the viability of C. neoformans. The first virulence factor that a host cell encounters is the polysaccharide capsule. The capsule attachment to the outer portion of the cell wall requires α-(1-3)-glucan (15, 46). Another cell wall associated virulence factor is the melanin pigment (61) that is produced by two laccase proteins, Lac1 and Lac2 (38, 44). Lac1 is responsible for generating the majority of melanin and is localized to the cell wall (38, 63, 69). Chitin and chitosan are essential components of the cell wall that have been shown to contribute to the overall strength and integrity of the cell wall (4, 5). The essentiality of the chitin component and the lack of it being present in host cells make chitin and its biosynthetic components attractive targets for drug design.Chitin is one of the most abundant polymers found in nature (1, 12). It is a linear polymer of β-(1,4)-linked N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc), and in fungi it is formed from cytoplasmic pools of UDP-GlcNAc. C. neoformans has eight predicted chitin synthases and three putative chitin synthase regulators for synthesis of chitin polymers. Mutational analysis indicate that two chitin synthases, Chs4 and Chs5, produce the majority of vegetative chitin, and one, Chs3, produces the majority of chitin that is converted to chitosan during vegetative growth (5). Chitosan, the deacetylated version of chitin, is produced by chitin deacetylases (EC 3.5.1.41) that remove acetyl groups from nascent chitin polymers. In C. neoformans the chitin produced by Chs3 and the chitin synthase regulator, Csr2, is deacetylated to chitosan by up to three chitin deacetylases (Cda1, Cda2, and Cda3) (4, 5). Strains of C. neoformans lacking either CHS3 or CSR2 have significantly reduced chitosan levels and are sensitive to a variety of cell wall inhibitors (5). Similarly, strains lacking all three chitin deacetylases are unable to convert chitin to chitosan and are sensitive to cell wall inhibitors (4). This indicates that chitosan is essential for the proper maintenance of cell wall integrity in C. neoformans and Chs3, Csr2, and the chitin deacetylases contribute to its formation (4, 5). Chitosan polymers of other fungi have been reported to possess various degrees of deacetylation (57). Chitin and chitosan are located throughout the lateral cell wall and bud neck regions of C. neoformans (4). During growth cellular chitin and chitosan need to be continuously remodeled, presumably through the enzymatic digestion of chitin and chitosan polymers by chitinases and or chitosanases.Chitinases (EC 3.2.1.14) are enzymes that hydrolyze the β-(1-4) linkages in polymers of chitin. Besides being in fungi, these enzymes occur in a wide variety of organisms, including viruses, bacteria, plants, and animals (1, 12). There are two major categories of chitinases: endochitinases and exochitinases. Generally, the endochitinases cleave chitin chains internally to generate low-molecular-mass multimers of GlcNAc. In contrast, the exochitinases are divided into two subcategories: chitobiosidases (EC 3.2.1.29) release diacetylchitobiose from the nonreducing end of chitin chains, and β-(1,4)-N-acetylhexosaminidases (EC 3.2.1.52) release GlcNAc from the nonreducing end of chitin oligosaccharides; both types are usually processive (12). Fungal chitosanases (EC 3.2.1.132) are less understood. They have been found in Aspergillus spp. and Gongronella sp. strain JG. Although these chitosanases have been shown to degrade chitosan, their in vitro physiological relevance has not been elucidated (8, 60).In other fungal systems chitinases are known to be involved in cell separation, hyphal growth and branching, development of reproductive structures, spore germination, and autolysis (1, 12). In the nonpathogenic model yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae two chitinases, Cts1p and Cts2p, function independently in bud separation and spore formation, respectively (25, 27). Cts1p is the only chitinase expressed during vegetative growth, and strains lacking this enzyme display incomplete cell separation (27) that can lead to pseudohyphalike growth (25). The synthesis of the spore wall is adversely affected by the deletion of CTS2 and affects the ability of the yeast to form mature asci (19).C. neoformans reproduces predominantly by budding, but also has a defined sexual cycle that culminates in the production of basidiospores. Both the yeast and the spore forms are thought to be infectious particles (7). C. neoformans typically colonizes the lungs of a immunocompromised host, from where it can disseminate to the central nervous system (7). As such, reproduction by budding has been shown to occur within host macrophages and dendritic cells (3, 28). Because fungal chitinases in other systems such as S. cerevisiae and C. albicans have been shown to be necessary for the completion of cell division (11, 27), understanding the biosynthesis and activity of chitinases could determine whether interfering with chitinase activity would impair the ability of C. neoformans to reproduce.We hypothesized that the chitinases in C. neoformans would be involved in growth and, like the chitinases in S. cerevisiae and C. albicans, that they would degrade specific chitin during either bud separation, hyphal growth, or sporulation. In the present study we utilized a homology-based search to identify five potential chitinases in C. neoformans, the four endochitinases CHI2, CHI21, CHI22, and CHI4 and one exochitinase, HEX1. Using a panel of chitinase deletion strains we discovered that the chitinases are dispensable for “normal” vegetative growth but were necessary during development of the sexual phase of C. neoformans.     

Levels of the Secreted Vibrio cholerae Attachment Factor GbpA Are Modulated by Quorum-Sensing-Induced Proteolysis

Vibrio cholerae is the etiologic agent of cholera in humans. Intestinal colonization occurs in a stepwise fashion, initiating with attachment to the small intestinal epithelium. This attachment is followed by expression of the toxin-coregulated pilus, microcolony formation, and cholera toxin (CT) production. We have recently characterized a secreted attachment factor, GlcNAc binding protein A (GbpA), which functions in attachment to environmental chitin sources as well as to intestinal substrates. Studies have been initiated to define the regulatory network involved in GbpA induction. At low cell density, GbpA was detected in the culture supernatant of all wild-type (WT) strains examined. In contrast, at high cell density, GbpA was undetectable in strains that produce HapR, the central regulator of the cell density-dependent quorum-sensing system of V. cholerae. HapR represses the expression of genes encoding regulators involved in V. cholerae virulence and activates the expression of genes encoding the secreted proteases HapA and PrtV. We show here that GbpA is degraded by HapA and PrtV in a time-dependent fashion. Consistent with this, ΔhapA ΔprtV strains attach to chitin beads more efficiently than either the WT or a ΔhapA ΔprtV ΔgbpA strain. These results suggest a model in which GbpA levels fluctuate in concert with the bacterial production of proteases in response to quorum-sensing signals. This could provide a mechanism for GbpA-mediated attachment to, and detachment from, surfaces in response to environmental cues.Vibrio cholerae has adapted to lifestyles in dual environments, allowing survival in aquatic locations, as well as the ability to colonize the epithelium of the human small intestine. This intestinal colonization by V. cholerae is a prerequisite for the disease cholera in humans. Intestinal colonization proceeds in a stepwise manner, initiating with attachment to the epithelial cell layer by multiple attachment factors (26). This stable attachment localizes the bacterium in an environment conducive for activation of subsequent virulence factors, including the toxin-coregulated pilus, a type IVb pilus that mediates cell-cell interactions and microcolony formation (27). Cholera toxin (CT) is produced and extracellularly secreted by bacteria within the microcolonies and enters into intestinal epithelial cells. CT causes the disruption of fluid and electrolyte balance and results in the voluminous rice water diarrhea characteristically observed with cholera patients.The ability of V. cholerae to bind to surfaces is crucial for the initial stages of colonization of both the aquatic and intestinal environments. Previous studies observing V. cholerae in the aquatic setting identified the ability of the bacteria to attach to zooplankton and phytoplankton, binding to surface structures that include chitin as a major component (7, 10, 11, 19, 21, 42). Chitin, a polymer consisting primarily of a β-1,4 linkage of GlcNAc monomers, is the most abundant aquatic carbon source and, when presented on the surfaces of zooplankton, aquatic exoskeletons, algae, and plants, provides a substrate for V. cholerae surface binding (8, 19-22). V. cholerae is able to break down chitin into carbon to use as a nutrient source via degradation by secreted chitinases (12). We have described a protein, GbpA (GlcNAc binding protein A), which facilitates the binding of V. cholerae to chitin, specifically to the chitin monomer GlcNAc, a sugar residue that is also found on the surface of epithelial cells (3, 16, 26). GbpA mediates binding to chitin, GlcNAc, and exoskeletons of Daphnia magna, as well as participates in effective intestinal colonization within the infant mouse model of cholera (26). GbpA is a secreted protein that exits the cell via the type 2 secretion system by which it mediates attachment by a yet uncharacterized mechanism (26). Previous studies examining the role of GbpA in binding to surfaces have been conducted utilizing various wild-type (WT) strains of V. cholerae, specifically O395 (26) and N16961 (33). These strains both are of the O1 serogroup but are differentially classified as classical (43) and El Tor biotypes (18), respectively. The classical biotype was responsible for the first six pandemics of cholera, whereas El Tor is the cause of the current pandemic (39).Quorum sensing regulates multiple bacterial processes, including virulence, formation of biofilms, and bioluminescence (25, 35, 36). In contrast to many other bacterial quorum-sensing systems, virulence gene expression and biofilm formation in V. cholerae is expressed under conditions of low cell density and repressed at high cell density (17, 35, 48). HapR, a member of the TetR family of regulatory proteins, is a central regulator on which the three parallel inputs of the V. cholerae quorum-sensing system converge (30, 35). During low-cell-density conditions, characteristic of growth within the aquatic environment or stages of early intestinal colonization, the quorum-sensing system is not engaged. Under conditions of high cell density, bacterial numbers and secreted autoinducer molecules are increased to a level that triggers the V. cholerae quorum-sensing system.HapR regulates gene function in two ways, serving as both an activator and repressor. At high cell density, HapR functions in the capacity of a repressor of the toxin-coregulated pilus and CT virulence cascade (29, 31) as well as a repressor of vps gene expression (17), preventing biofilm formation. In addition to repressing gene expression, at high cell density HapR activates the expression of genes encoding extracellularly secreted proteases HapA and PrtV (14, 17, 23, 45-47). HapA, also referred to as hemagglutinin/protease (HA/P), was first reported as a mucinase by Burnet (6) and later characterized as a zinc- and calcium-dependent metalloprotease (4). Extracellularly secreted via the V. cholerae type 2 secretion pathway (40), HA/P has been demonstrated to cleave fibronectin, lactoferrin, and mucin (15), as well as to participate in the activation of the CT A subunit (5). Further studies have led to the suggestion that HA/P is a detachase, critical for the release of V. cholerae from the surface of intestinal cells (2, 14, 38). PrtV is a second protease encoded by a gene that is activated by HapR (47). It has been demonstrated to be essential for both V. cholerae killing of Caenorhabditis elegans, as well as protecting V. cholerae from predator grazing by various flagellates (32, 45).The data presented here indicate that HapA and PrtV participate in the targeted degradation of the attachment factor GbpA. We demonstrate that GbpA is present during the logarithmic phase of growth and conditions of low cell density but that it is not present in the supernatant of high-cell-density cultures of strains that express functional HapR. Further studies revealed that during stages of high cell density, proteases HapA and PrtV, encoded by HapR-activated genes, are responsible for GbpA degradation in the culture supernatant. These findings suggest that the attachment factor GbpA is potentially a ligand targeted for protease degradation during the epithelial detachment process. This process could aid in the release of V. cholerae back into the aquatic environment following late stages of intestinal colonization.     

Enterocin X,a Novel Two-Peptide Bacteriocin from Enterococcus faecium KU-B5, Has an Antibacterial Spectrum Entirely Different from Those of Its Component Peptides

Enterocin X, composed of two antibacterial peptides (Xα and Xβ), is a novel class IIb bacteriocin from Enterococcus faecium KU-B5. When combined, Xα and Xβ display variably enhanced or reduced antibacterial activity toward a panel of indicators compared to each peptide individually. In E. faecium strains that produce enterocins A and B, such as KU-B5, only one additional bacteriocin had previously been known.Bacteriocins are gene-encoded antibacterial peptides and proteins. Because of their natural ability to preserve food, they are of particular interest to researchers in the food industry. Bacteriocins are grouped into three main classes according to their physical properties and compositions (11, 12). Of these, class IIb bacteriocins are thermostable non-lanthionine-containing two-peptide bacteriocins whose full antibacterial activity requires the interaction of two complementary peptides (8, 19). Therefore, two-peptide bacteriocins are considered to function together as one antibacterial entity (14).Enterocins A and B, first discovered and identified about 12 years ago (2, 3), are frequently present in Enterococcus faecium strains from various sources (3, 5, 6, 9, 13, 16). So far, no other bacteriocins have been identified in these strains, except the enterocin P-like bacteriocin from E. faecium JCM 5804^T (18). Here, we describe the characterization and genetic identification of enterocin X in E. faecium KU-B5. Enterocin X (identified after the enterocin P-like bacteriocin was discovered) is a newly found class IIb bacteriocin in E. faecium strains that produce enterocins A and B.     

A New Borrelia Species Defined by Multilocus Sequence Analysis of Housekeeping Genes

Analysis of Lyme borreliosis (LB) spirochetes, using a novel multilocus sequence analysis scheme, revealed that OspA serotype 4 strains (a rodent-associated ecotype) of Borrelia garinii were sufficiently genetically distinct from bird-associated B. garinii strains to deserve species status. We suggest that OspA serotype 4 strains be raised to species status and named Borrelia bavariensis sp. nov. The rooted phylogenetic trees provide novel insights into the evolutionary history of LB spirochetes.Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) have been shown to be powerful and pragmatic molecular methods for typing large numbers of microbial strains for population genetics studies, delineation of species, and assignment of strains to defined bacterial species (4, 13, 27, 40, 44). To date, MLST/MLSA schemes have been applied only to a few vector-borne microbial populations (1, 6, 30, 37, 40, 41, 47).Lyme borreliosis (LB) spirochetes comprise a diverse group of zoonotic bacteria which are transmitted among vertebrate hosts by ixodid (hard) ticks. The most common agents of human LB are Borrelia burgdorferi (sensu stricto), Borrelia afzelii, Borrelia garinii, Borrelia lusitaniae, and Borrelia spielmanii (7, 8, 12, 35). To date, 15 species have been named within the group of LB spirochetes (6, 31, 32, 37, 38, 41). While several of these LB species have been delineated using whole DNA-DNA hybridization (3, 20, 33), most ecological or epidemiological studies have been using single loci (5, 9-11, 29, 34, 36, 38, 42, 51, 53). Although some of these loci have been convenient for species assignment of strains or to address particular epidemiological questions, they may be unsuitable to resolve evolutionary relationships among LB species, because it is not possible to define any outgroup. For example, both the 5S-23S intergenic spacer (5S-23S IGS) and the gene encoding the outer surface protein A (ospA) are present only in LB spirochete genomes (36, 43). The advantage of using appropriate housekeeping genes of LB group spirochetes is that phylogenetic trees can be rooted with sequences of relapsing fever spirochetes. This renders the data amenable to detailed evolutionary studies of LB spirochetes.LB group spirochetes differ remarkably in their patterns and levels of host association, which are likely to affect their population structures (22, 24, 46, 48). Of the three main Eurasian Borrelia species, B. afzelii is adapted to rodents, whereas B. valaisiana and most strains of B. garinii are maintained by birds (12, 15, 16, 23, 26, 45). However, B. garinii OspA serotype 4 strains in Europe have been shown to be transmitted by rodents (17, 18) and, therefore, constitute a distinct ecotype within B. garinii. These strains have also been associated with high pathogenicity in humans, and their finer-scale geographical distribution seems highly focal (10, 34, 52, 53).In this study, we analyzed the intra- and interspecific phylogenetic relationships of B. burgdorferi, B. afzelii, B. garinii, B. valaisiana, B. lusitaniae, B. bissettii, and B. spielmanii by means of a novel MLSA scheme based on chromosomal housekeeping genes (30, 48).     

Roles of Minor Pilin Subunits Spy0125 and Spy0130 in the Serotype M1 Streptococcus pyogenes Strain SF370

Adhesive pili on the surface of the serotype M1 Streptococcus pyogenes strain SF370 are composed of a major backbone subunit (Spy0128) and two minor subunits (Spy0125 and Spy0130), joined covalently by a pilin polymerase (Spy0129). Previous studies using recombinant proteins showed that both minor subunits bind to human pharyngeal (Detroit) cells (A. G. Manetti et al., Mol. Microbiol. 64:968-983, 2007), suggesting both may act as pilus-presented adhesins. While confirming these binding properties, studies described here indicate that Spy0125 is the pilus-presented adhesin and that Spy0130 has a distinct role as a wall linker. Pili were localized predominantly to cell wall fractions of the wild-type S. pyogenes parent strain and a spy0125 deletion mutant. In contrast, they were found almost exclusively in culture supernatants in both spy0130 and srtA deletion mutants, indicating that the housekeeping sortase (SrtA) attaches pili to the cell wall by using Spy0130 as a linker protein. Adhesion assays with antisera specific for individual subunits showed that only anti-rSpy0125 serum inhibited adhesion of wild-type S. pyogenes to human keratinocytes and tonsil epithelium to a significant extent. Spy0125 was localized to the tip of pili, based on a combination of mutant analysis and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis of purified pili. Assays comparing parent and mutant strains confirmed its role as the adhesin. Unexpectedly, apparent spontaneous cleavage of a labile, proline-rich (8 of 14 residues) sequence separating the N-terminal ∼1/3 and C-terminal ∼2/3 of Spy0125 leads to loss of the N-terminal region, but analysis of internal spy0125 deletion mutants confirmed that this has no significant effect on adhesion.The group A Streptococcus (S. pyogenes) is an exclusively human pathogen that commonly colonizes either the pharynx or skin, where local spread can give rise to various inflammatory conditions such as pharyngitis, tonsillitis, sinusitis, or erysipelas. Although often mild and self-limiting, GAS infections are occasionally very severe and sometimes lead to life-threatening diseases, such as necrotizing fasciitis or streptococcal toxic shock syndrome. A wide variety of cell surface components and extracellular products have been shown or suggested to play important roles in S. pyogenes virulence, including cell surface pili (1, 6, 32). Pili expressed by the serotype M1 S. pyogenes strain SF370 mediate specific adhesion to intact human tonsil epithelia and to primary human keratinocytes, as well as cultured keratinocyte-derived HaCaT cells, but not to Hep-2 or A549 cells (1). They also contribute to adhesion to a human pharyngeal cell line (Detroit cells) and to biofilm formation (29).Over the past 5 years, pili have been discovered on an increasing number of important Gram-positive bacterial pathogens, including Bacillus cereus (4), Bacillus anthracis (4, 5), Corynebacterium diphtheriae (13, 14, 19, 26, 27, 44, 46, 47), Streptococcus agalactiae (7, 23, 38), and Streptococcus pneumoniae (2, 3, 24, 25, 34), as well as S. pyogenes (1, 29, 32). All these species produce pili that are composed of a single major subunit plus either one or two minor subunits. During assembly, the individual subunits are covalently linked to each other via intermolecular isopeptide bonds, catalyzed by specialized membrane-associated transpeptidases that may be described as pilin polymerases (4, 7, 25, 41, 44, 46). These are related to the classical housekeeping sortase (usually, but not always, designated SrtA) that is responsible for anchoring many proteins to Gram-positive bacterial cell walls (30, 31, 33). The C-terminal ends of sortase target proteins include a cell wall sorting (CWS) motif consisting, in most cases, of Leu-Pro-X-Thr-Gly (LPXTG, where X can be any amino acid) (11, 40). Sortases cleave this substrate between the Thr and Gly residues and produce an intermolecular isopeptide bond linking the Thr to a free amino group provided by a specific target. In attaching proteins to the cell wall, the target amino group is provided by the lipid II peptidoglycan precursor (30, 36, 40). In joining pilus subunits, the target is the ɛ-amino group in the side chain of a specific Lys residue in the second subunit (14, 18, 19). Current models of pilus biogenesis envisage repeated transpeptidation reactions adding additional subunits to the base of the growing pilus, until the terminal subunit is eventually linked covalently via an intermolecular isopeptide bond to the cell wall (28, 41, 45).The major subunit (sometimes called the backbone or shaft subunit) extends along the length of the pilus and appears to play a structural role, while minor subunits have been detected either at the tip, the base, and/or at occasional intervals along the shaft, depending on the species (4, 23, 24, 32, 47). In S. pneumoniae and S. agalactiae one of the minor subunits acts as an adhesin, while the second appears to act as a linker between the base of the assembled pilus and the cell wall (7, 15, 22, 34, 35). It was originally suggested that both minor subunits of C. diphtheriae pili could act as adhesins (27). However, recent data showed one of these has a wall linker role (26, 44) and may therefore not function as an adhesin.S. pyogenes strain SF370 pili are composed of a major (backbone) subunit, termed Spy0128, plus two minor subunits, called Spy0125 and Spy0130 (1, 32). All three are required for efficient adhesion to target cells (1). Studies employing purified recombinant proteins have shown that both of the minor subunits, but not the major subunit, bind to Detroit cells (29), suggesting both might act as pilus-presented adhesins. Here we report studies employing a combination of recombinant proteins, specific antisera, and allelic replacement mutants which show that only Spy0125 is the pilus-presented adhesin and that Spy0130 has a distinct role in linking pili to the cell wall.     

Cultivation of Fastidious Bacteria by Viability Staining and Micromanipulation in a Soil Substrate Membrane System

Soil substrate membrane systems allow for microcultivation of fastidious soil bacteria as mixed microbial communities. We isolated established microcolonies from these membranes by using fluorescence viability staining and micromanipulation. This approach facilitated the recovery of diverse, novel isolates, including the recalcitrant bacterium Leifsonia xyli, a plant pathogen that has never been isolated outside the host.The majority of bacterial species have never been recovered in the laboratory (1, 14, 19, 24). In the last decade, novel cultivation approaches have successfully been used to recover “unculturables” from a diverse range of divisions (23, 25, 29). Most strategies have targeted marine environments (4, 23, 25, 32), but soil offers the potential for the investigation of vast numbers of undescribed species (20, 29). Rapid advances have been made toward culturing soil bacteria by reformulating and diluting traditional media, extending incubation times, and using alternative gelling agents (8, 21, 29).The soil substrate membrane system (SSMS) is a diffusion chamber approach that uses extracts from the soil of interest as the growth substrate, thereby mimicking the environment under investigation (12). The SSMS enriches for slow-growing oligophiles, a proportion of which are subsequently capable of growing on complex media (23, 25, 27, 30, 32). However, the SSMS results in mixed microbial communities, with the consequent difficulty in isolation of individual microcolonies for further characterization (10).Micromanipulation has been widely used for the isolation of specific cell morphotypes for downstream applications in molecular diagnostics or proteomics (5, 15). This simple technology offers the opportunity to select established microcolonies of a specific morphotype from the SSMS when combined with fluorescence visualization (3, 11). Here, we have combined the SSMS, fluorescence viability staining, and advanced micromanipulation for targeted isolation of viable, microcolony-forming soil bacteria.     

Genetic Analysis of a Novel Xylella fastidiosa Subspecies Found in the Southwestern United States

Xylella fastidiosa, the causal agent of several scorch diseases, is associated with leaf scorch symptoms in Chitalpa tashkentensis, a common ornamental landscape plant used throughout the southwestern United States. For a number of years, many chitalpa trees in southern New Mexico and Arizona exhibited leaf scorch symptoms, and the results from a regional survey show that chitalpa trees from New Mexico, Arizona, and California are frequently infected with X. fastidiosa. Phylogenetic analysis of multiple loci was used to compare the X. fastidiosa infecting chitalpa strains from New Mexico, Arizona, and trees imported into New Mexico nurseries with previously reported X. fastidiosa strains. Loci analyzed included the 16S ribosome, 16S-23S ribosomal intergenic spacer region, gyrase-B, simple sequence repeat sequences, X. fastidiosa-specific sequences, and the virulence-associated protein (VapD). This analysis indicates that the X. fastidiosa isolates associated with infected chitalpa trees in the Southwest are a highly related group that is distinct from the four previously defined taxons X. fastidiosa subsp. fastidiosa (piercei), X. fastidiosa subsp. multiplex, X. fastidiosa subsp. sandyi, and X. fastidiosa subsp. pauca. Therefore, the classification proposed for this new subspecies is X. fastidiosa subsp. tashke.Xylella fastidiosa is a gram-negative bacterium that multiplies within the xylem and causes serious disease problems in many diverse plant species. X. fastidiosa is considered a “new world” pathogen and is mainly found within North, Central, and South America (30). In many native plant species this bacterium exists as an apparently benign endophyte, while in other instances proliferation of X. fastidiosa within the xylem leads to disease typified by symptoms, including leaf scorch, chlorosis, stunting, branch dieback, inedible fruit, and eventually the death of the plant (4, 15). X. fastidiosa is transmitted by xylem-feeding insect vectors such as sharpshooters, leafhoppers, and spittle bugs (35). Diseases caused by X. fastidiosa include Pierce''s disease in grapes (7), citrus variegated chlorosis (CVC) (6), coffee leaf scorch (18), pecan leaf scorch (36), phony peach (41), plum leaf scald (32), and almond leaf scorch (25). X. fastidiosa has also been shown to be the causative agent of diseases found in landscape plants such as oleander leaf scorch (31), mulberry leaf scorch (14), and oak leaf scorch (3). In addition to the examples above proven through the completion of Koch''s postulates, X. fastidiosa is known to be associated with leaf scorch type diseases in several other ornamental landscape species including crape myrtle, olive, day lily, and southern magnolia (12).Chitalpa (Chitalpa tashkentensis Elias and Wisura) is an ornamental landscape plant that was developed for arid landscapes such as California, Arizona, Texas, and New Mexico. Chitalpa, originally bred in Russia and introduced into the United States in 1977, is an intergenic hybrid between desert willow (Chilopsis linearis Cav.) and Catalpa bignonioides Walt. (28). In the past, chitalpa trees across the Southwest were observed to display leaf scorch symptoms of unknown origin. X. fastidiosa was detected in many chitalpa trees that displayed leaf scorch symptoms in southern New Mexico (34). The first known occurrence of Pierce''s disease in New Mexico was reported in 2007, and the strains of X. fastidiosa found in infected New Mexico grapes were very similar to those present in chitalpa trees from the same area (33). The common use of chitalpa as a landscape plant in the Southwest coupled with the recent discovery that it can harbor X. fastidiosa strains similar to those associated with Pierce''s disease in New Mexico prompted a survey of chitalpa trees across the Southwest. The results of this survey show that chitalpa trees from New Mexico and Arizona are frequently infected with X. fastidiosa. Chitalpa plants imported into New Mexico nurseries from California were also found to contain similar strains of X. fastidiosa. A multilocus phylogenetic analysis was performed to further characterize these strains of X. fastidiosa. This analysis revealed that the X. fastidiosa isolates infecting chitalpa plants in New Mexico, Arizona, and imported into nurseries from California are highly related to each other and are distinct from the previously described subspecies fastidiosa (38).     

The C-Terminal Domain of Cernunnos/XLF Is Dispensable for DNA Repair In Vivo

The core nonhomologous end-joining DNA repair pathway is composed of seven factors: Ku70, Ku80, DNA-PKcs, Artemis, XRCC4 (X4), DNA ligase IV (L4), and Cernunnos/XLF (Cernunnos). Although Cernunnos and X4 are structurally related and participate in the same complex together with L4, they have distinct functions during DNA repair. L4 relies on X4 but not on Cernunnos for its stability, and L4 is required for optimal interaction of Cernunnos with X4. We demonstrate here, using in vitro-generated Cernunnos mutants and a series of functional assays in vivo, that the C-terminal region of Cernunnos is dispensable for its activity during DNA repair.Nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) represents the main pathway for solving DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) in mammals. The core of the NHEJ pathway is composed of seven proteins: Ku70, Ku80, DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs), Artemis, XRCC4 (X4), DNA ligase IV (L4), and Cernunnos/XLF (Cernunnos) (reviewed in reference 18). Briefly, the Ku70-Ku80 heterodimer bound to broken DNA recruits the serine/threonine kinase DNA-PKcs. DNA-PK phosphorylates downstream effectors such as the nuclease Artemis. The X4-L4 complex carries out the final joining of synapsed DNA ends in association with Cernunnos (2, 6). Cernunnos was identified through cDNA functional complementation of a fibroblast cell line obtained from a human patient with immune deficiency and microcephaly (5). The same factor, called XLF, was identified through a yeast two-hybrid screen with X4 as a bait (2).Cernunnos is structurally related to X4 and consists of a globular head domain followed by a coiled-coil region and an unstructured C-terminal domain (2, 6, 12). One major difference between the structures of X4 and Cernunnos appears in the coiled-coil region. While this region is linear in X4, a hinge in the middle of the coiled-coil of Cernunnos folds back the end of the domain toward the head (3, 14).Cernunnos interacts with the X4-L4 complex in vivo and in vitro (2, 6). Cernunnos and X4 both appear to interact directly with L4, but the Cernunnos-L4 interaction seems to be very weak (7). In addition, purified Cernunnos associates with DNA in a sequence-independent manner (20) but in a DNA length-dependent manner, like X4 (15). Although the X4-L4 complex can ligate DNA in vitro (10), Cernunnos further improves this activity (11, 15, 16, 20). Cernunnos seems important, in particular, for the ligation of mismatched or noncohesive DNA ends, but not for that of compatible DNA ends, in vitro (10, 20).Cernunnos is therefore a “core” NHEJ component, but limited information is available about its precise function during DNA repair in vivo. We show here that although X4 and Cernunnos share sequence and structural homologies, their functions are distinct. We also demonstrate that Cernunnos requires L4 for its association with X4. Lastly, the Cernunnos C terminus is dispensable for DNA repair following ionizing radiation (IR) and V(D)J recombination.     

Alignment of the c-Type Cytochrome OmcS along Pili of Geobacter sulfurreducens

Immunogold localization revealed that OmcS, a cytochrome that is required for Fe(III) oxide reduction by Geobacter sulfurreducens, was localized along the pili. The apparent spacing between OmcS molecules suggests that OmcS facilitates electron transfer from pili to Fe(III) oxides rather than promoting electron conduction along the length of the pili.There are multiple competing/complementary models for extracellular electron transfer in Fe(III)- and electrode-reducing microorganisms (8, 18, 20, 44). Which mechanisms prevail in different microorganisms or environmental conditions may greatly influence which microorganisms compete most successfully in sedimentary environments or on the surfaces of electrodes and can impact practical decisions on the best strategies to promote Fe(III) reduction for bioremediation applications (18, 19) or to enhance the power output of microbial fuel cells (18, 21).The three most commonly considered mechanisms for electron transfer to extracellular electron acceptors are (i) direct contact between redox-active proteins on the outer surfaces of the cells and the electron acceptor, (ii) electron transfer via soluble electron shuttling molecules, and (iii) the conduction of electrons along pili or other filamentous structures. Evidence for the first mechanism includes the necessity for direct cell-Fe(III) oxide contact in Geobacter species (34) and the finding that intensively studied Fe(III)- and electrode-reducing microorganisms, such as Geobacter sulfurreducens and Shewanella oneidensis MR-1, display redox-active proteins on their outer cell surfaces that could have access to extracellular electron acceptors (1, 2, 12, 15, 27, 28, 31-33). Deletion of the genes for these proteins often inhibits Fe(III) reduction (1, 4, 7, 15, 17, 28, 40) and electron transfer to electrodes (5, 7, 11, 33). In some instances, these proteins have been purified and shown to have the capacity to reduce Fe(III) and other potential electron acceptors in vitro (10, 13, 29, 38, 42, 43, 48, 49).Evidence for the second mechanism includes the ability of some microorganisms to reduce Fe(III) that they cannot directly contact, which can be associated with the accumulation of soluble substances that can promote electron shuttling (17, 22, 26, 35, 36, 47). In microbial fuel cell studies, an abundance of planktonic cells and/or the loss of current-producing capacity when the medium is replaced is consistent with the presence of an electron shuttle (3, 14, 26). Furthermore, a soluble electron shuttle is the most likely explanation for the electrochemical signatures of some microorganisms growing on an electrode surface (26, 46).Evidence for the third mechanism is more circumstantial (19). Filaments that have conductive properties have been identified in Shewanella (7) and Geobacter (41) species. To date, conductance has been measured only across the diameter of the filaments, not along the length. The evidence that the conductive filaments were involved in extracellular electron transfer in Shewanella was the finding that deletion of the genes for the c-type cytochromes OmcA and MtrC, which are necessary for extracellular electron transfer, resulted in nonconductive filaments, suggesting that the cytochromes were associated with the filaments (7). However, subsequent studies specifically designed to localize these cytochromes revealed that, although the cytochromes were extracellular, they were attached to the cells or in the exopolymeric matrix and not aligned along the pili (24, 25, 30, 40, 43). Subsequent reviews of electron transfer to Fe(III) in Shewanella oneidensis (44, 45) appear to have dropped the nanowire concept and focused on the first and second mechanisms.Geobacter sulfurreducens has a number of c-type cytochromes (15, 28) and multicopper proteins (12, 27) that have been demonstrated or proposed to be on the outer cell surface and are essential for extracellular electron transfer. Immunolocalization and proteolysis studies demonstrated that the cytochrome OmcB, which is essential for optimal Fe(III) reduction (15) and highly expressed during growth on electrodes (33), is embedded in the outer membrane (39), whereas the multicopper protein OmpB, which is also required for Fe(III) oxide reduction (27), is exposed on the outer cell surface (39).OmcS is one of the most abundant cytochromes that can readily be sheared from the outer surfaces of G. sulfurreducens cells (28). It is essential for the reduction of Fe(III) oxide (28) and for electron transfer to electrodes under some conditions (11). Therefore, the localization of this important protein was further investigated.     

Development and Application of a Novel Peptide Nucleic Acid Probe for the Specific Detection of Cronobacter Genomospecies (Enterobacter sakazakii) in Powdered Infant Formula

Here, we report a fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) method for rapid detection of Cronobacter strains in powdered infant formula (PIF) using a novel peptide nucleic acid (PNA) probe. Laboratory tests with several Enterobacteriaceae species showed that the specificity and sensitivity of the method were 100%. FISH using PNA could detect as few as 1 CFU per 10 g of Cronobacter in PIF after an 8-h enrichment step, even in a mixed population containing bacterial contaminants.Cronobacter strains were originally described as Enterobacter sakazakii (12), but they are now known to comprise a novel genus consisting of six separate genomospecies (20, 21). These opportunistic pathogens are ubiquitous in the environment and various types of food and are occasionally found in the normal human flora (11, 12, 16, 32, 47). Based on case reports, Cronobacter infections in adults are generally less severe than Cronobacter infections in newborn infants, with which a high fatality rate is associated (24).The ability to detect Cronobacter and trace possible sources of infection is essential as a means of limiting the impact of these organisms on neonatal health and maintaining consumer confidence in powdered infant formula (PIF). Conventional methods, involving isolation of individual colonies followed by biochemical identification, are more time-consuming than molecular methods, and the reliability of some currently proposed culture-based methods has been questioned (28). Recently, several PCR-based techniques have been described (23, 26, 28-31, 38). These techniques are reported to be efficient even when low levels of Cronobacter cells are found in a sample (0.36 to 66 CFU/100 g). However, PCR requires DNA extraction and does not allow direct, in situ visualization of the bacterium in a sample.Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is a method that is commonly used for bacterial identification and localization in samples. This method is based on specific binding of nucleic acid probes to particular DNA or RNA target regions (1, 2). rRNA has been regarded as the most suitable target for bacterial FISH, allowing differentiation of potentially viable cells. Traditionally, FISH methods are based on the use of conventional DNA oligonucleotide probes, and a commercial system, VIT-E sakazakii (Vermicon A.G., Munich, Germany), has been developed based on this technology (25). However, a recently developed synthetic DNA analogue, peptide nucleic acid (PNA), has been shown to provide improved hybridization performance compared to DNA probes, making FISH procedures easier and more efficient (41). Taking advantage of the PNA properties, FISH using PNA has been successfully used for detection of several clinically relevant microorganisms (5, 15, 17, 27, 34-36).     

Cell-to-Cell Spread of the RNA Interference Response Suppresses Semliki Forest Virus (SFV) Infection of Mosquito Cell Cultures and Cannot Be Antagonized by SFV

In their vertebrate hosts, arboviruses such as Semliki Forest virus (SFV) (Togaviridae) generally counteract innate defenses and trigger cell death. In contrast, in mosquito cells, following an early phase of efficient virus production, a persistent infection with low levels of virus production is established. Whether arboviruses counteract RNA interference (RNAi), which provides an important antiviral defense system in mosquitoes, is an important question. Here we show that in Aedes albopictus-derived mosquito cells, SFV cannot prevent the establishment of an antiviral RNAi response or prevent the spread of protective antiviral double-stranded RNA/small interfering RNA (siRNA) from cell to cell, which can inhibit the replication of incoming virus. The expression of tombusvirus siRNA-binding protein p19 by SFV strongly enhanced virus spread between cultured cells rather than virus replication in initially infected cells. Our results indicate that the spread of the RNAi signal contributes to limiting virus dissemination.In animals, RNA interference (RNAi) was first described for Caenorhabditis elegans (27). The production or introduction of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) in cells leads to the degradation of mRNAs containing homologous sequences by sequence-specific cleavage of mRNAs. Central to RNAi is the production of 21- to 26-nucleotide small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) from dsRNA and the assembly of an RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), followed by the degradation of the target mRNA (23, 84). RNAi is a known antiviral strategy of plants (3, 53) and insects (21, 39, 51). Study of Drosophila melanogaster in particular has given important insights into RNAi responses against pathogenic viruses and viral RNAi inhibitors (31, 54, 83, 86, 91). RNAi is well characterized for Drosophila, and orthologs of antiviral RNAi genes have been found in Aedes and Culex spp. (13, 63).Arboviruses, or arthropod-borne viruses, are RNA viruses mainly of the families Bunyaviridae, Flaviviridae, and Togaviridae. The genus Alphavirus within the family Togaviridae contains several mosquito-borne pathogens: arboviruses such as Chikungunya virus (16) and equine encephalitis viruses (88). Replication of the prototype Sindbis virus and Semliki Forest virus (SFV) is well understood (44, 71, 74, 79). Their genome consists of a positive-stranded RNA with a 5′ cap and a 3′ poly(A) tail. The 5′ two-thirds encodes the nonstructural polyprotein P1234, which is cleaved into four replicase proteins, nsP1 to nsP4 (47, 58, 60). The structural polyprotein is encoded in the 3′ one-third of the genome and cleaved into capsid and glycoproteins after translation from a subgenomic mRNA (79). Cytoplasmic replication complexes are associated with cellular membranes (71). Viruses mature by budding at the plasma membrane (35).In nature, arboviruses are spread by arthropod vectors (predominantly mosquitoes, ticks, flies, and midges) to vertebrate hosts (87). Little is known about how arthropod cells react to arbovirus infection. In mosquito cell cultures, an acute phase with efficient virus production is generally followed by the establishment of a persistent infection with low levels of virus production (9). This is fundamentally different from the cytolytic events following arbovirus interactions with mammalian cells and pathogenic insect viruses with insect cells. Alphaviruses encode host response antagonists for mammalian cells (2, 7, 34, 38).RNAi has been described for mosquitoes (56) and, when induced before infection, antagonizes arboviruses and their replicons (1, 4, 14, 15, 29, 30, 32, 42, 64, 65). RNAi is also functional in various mosquito cell lines (1, 8, 43, 49, 52). In the absence of RNAi, alphavirus and flavivirus replication and/or dissemination is enhanced in both mosquitoes and Drosophila (14, 17, 31, 45, 72). RNAi inhibitors weakly enhance SFV replicon replication in tick and mosquito cells (5, 33), posing the questions of how, when, and where RNAi interferes with alphavirus infection in mosquito cells.Here we use an A. albopictus-derived mosquito cell line to study RNAi responses to SFV. Using reporter-based assays, we demonstrate that SFV cannot avoid or efficiently inhibit the establishment of an RNAi response. We also demonstrate that the RNAi signal can spread between mosquito cells. SFV cannot inhibit cell-to-cell spread of the RNAi signal, and spread of the virus-induced RNAi signal (dsRNA/siRNA) can inhibit the replication of incoming SFV in neighboring cells. Furthermore, we show that SFV expression of a siRNA-binding protein increases levels of virus replication mainly by enhancing virus spread between cells rather than replication in initially infected cells. Taken together, these findings suggest a novel mechanism, cell-to-cell spread of antiviral dsRNA/siRNA, by which RNAi limits SFV dissemination in mosquito cells.     

Inhibition of Selenium Metabolism in the Oral Pathogen Treponema denticola

In this report we provide evidence that the antimicrobial action of stannous salts and a gold drug, auranofin, against Treponema denticola is mediated through inhibition of the metabolism of selenium for synthesis of selenoproteins.The biological use of selenium as a catalyst, incorporated into proteins as selenocysteine, is broad. It plays an essential role in energy metabolism, redox balance, and reproduction in a variety of organisms, from bacterial pathogens to eukaryotic parasites to humans. The results of several epidemiological studies indicate that higher levels of selenium in the mammalian diet can have a negative effect on dental health (2, 17-19, 39). Although the impact of selenium is attributed to its influence on the physical properties of the enamel surface (10), the role of selenium in supporting the oral microbial community has not been studied.The oral cavity is a highly complex microbiome, with a large proportion of its residents uncharacterized due to their fastidious nature and resistance to traditional culture methods (11). Analysis of whole saliva indicates that bacterial metabolism influences the amino acid composition and indicates a role for amino acid fermentation (38). Curtis et al. demonstrated the occurrence of Stickland reactions in dental plaque (9). These reactions were first described in clostridia (35-37). They involve the coupled fermentation of amino acids in which one amino acid is oxidized (Stickland donor) and another (Stickland acceptor) is reduced (29). Treponema denticola, an established resident of the oral cavity, performs Stickland reactions via the selenoprotein glycine reductase (32). Glycine reductase is composed of a multiprotein complex that contains two separate selenoproteins, termed selenoprotein A and selenoprotein B (1, 7, 8, 15, 16). This complex of proteins converts glycine to acetyl phosphate by using inorganic phosphate and the reducing potential from thioredoxin. For the organisms that use this complex, this is a vital source of ATP. Thus far, the requirement for selenocysteine at the active site of this enzyme complex is universally conserved, even though all other selenoproteins that have been identified using computational techniques have a putative cysteine homologue (24).Treponema denticola is considered one of the primary pathogens responsible for periodontitis, a chronic inflammatory disease that is the major cause of adult tooth loss (11, 27, 33). It is the best-studied oral spirochete, commonly found with other spirochetes within the periodontal pocket. It expresses a variety of virulence factors and is capable of adhering to and penetrating endothelial cell monolayers (31). Its health impact may reach beyond the oral cavity. A recent study linked periodontitis with peripheral arterial disease and detected T. denticola, along with other periodontal pathogens, in atherosclerotic plaque (3). Sequence analysis indicates the presence of several selenoproteins in addition to glycine reductase within the genome of T. denticola (24). This organism exhibits a strict growth requirement for selenium (32).A significant literature exists that clearly demonstrates the antimicrobial activity of fluoride compounds against microorganisms associated with dental decay and periodontitis. Both sodium fluoride and stannous fluoride, as well as stannous ions alone, inhibit the growth of T. denticola (21). The inhibitory effect of stannous salts on T. denticola''s growth is unexplained. It should be noted that toothpastes containing stannous fluoride are more effective in reducing gingivitis and plaque (28, 30).Tin, as well as several other trace elements, modulates the effects of acute selenium toxicity (20). Conversely, selenium affects the activity of tin in animal models (4-6). In this study, we examine the possibility that stannous ions interfere with selenium metabolism in T. denticola.