The use of TMA for interlaboratory validation of FISH testing for detection of HER2 gene amplification in breast cancer.

HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) testing for breast cancer is largely limited to academic centers and commercial laboratories. As testing demands increase, methods for rapid and cost-effective technical validation and quality assessment will be required. Tissue microarray (TMA), a technique for high-throughput biomarker evaluation, could help facilitate these needs. Our objective was to assess the usefulness of TMA technology for validation of HER2 FISH testing. Two TMA blocks containing paired cores from 41 breast cancers were constructed. HER2 FISH was performed in parallel at two institutions and the results compared. One institution, with considerable HER2 FISH experience, served as the reference laboratory. HER2 chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) were compared to the FISH results. For positive and negative results, the concordance rate between laboratories was 100%. Using kappa statistical analysis to determine interobserver agreement, HER2 to chromosome 17 gene copy ratios showed strong agreement between laboratories with kappa = 0.85 (perfect agreement = 1.0). Four cases displaying low-level amplification by CISH contained chromosome 17 polysomy and gene copy ratios of <2.0 by FISH. Good concordance was observed between HER2 IHC and in situ hybridization testing. TMA is a robust and effective method for the technical validation of HER2 FISH testing and should be considered for use by quality assessment programs.     

Chromogenic in situ hybridization analysis of HER-2/neu status in cytological samples of breast carcinoma

The current use of humanized monoclonal antibody trastuzumab for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer has made evaluation of HER-2/neu status an important clinical issue. Chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH), in which the DNA probe is detected with an immunohistochemistry (IHC)-like peroxidase reaction, has been recently developed for the assessment of HER-2/neu status in formalin-fixed breast cancer specimens. We have applied the technique of dual-colour CISH using HER-2/neu and chromosome 17 centromere probes in 27 cytological smears, and these cytological samples were obtained from scrapings of fresh breast tumours. We also investigated HER-2/neu amplification and protein overexpression in the corresponding surgical tissues by CISH and IHC using the monoclonal antibody CB11. Of the 27 cytological cases, HER-2/neu gene amplification was observed in nine cases that were positive cases (2+ and 3+) for IHC. Among the 13 IHC positive cases (2+ and 3+), four of them showed no gene amplification. Identical results for the CISH technique were obtained in the matched surgical samples. The scrape samples from fresh breast tumour offer a monolayer cell population that is especially suitable for CISH. This study has shown that the cytological smear might be a good alternative for the CISH test.     

Comparison of chromogenic <Emphasis Type="Italic">in situ</Emphasis> hybridization with other methodologies for HER2 status assesment in breast cancer

The high incidence of human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)2 overexpression on breast and various other cancer cells and the prognostic and potentially predictive value of HER2 render this growth receptor a novel and important therapeutic target. Out of a wide range of assays that have been used in research for the detection of HER2 status, only two techniques are now predominant and readily applicable in the routine clinical pathology laboratory: determination of HER2 overexpression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and HER2 gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH). In a retrospective study on a cohort of 173 archival invasive breast carcinomas a chromogenic in situ hybridisation (CISH) assay for the detection of HER2 amplification was established. Results were compared to HercepTest, which is the most frequently used method for detecting HER2 alteration. Additionally, HER2 gene copy number was investigated using differential PCR (dPCR) as a testing system. Discrepant cases between CISH and HercepTest and all IHC positive cases (2+ and 3+), a total of 42 cases, were analysed with FISH Path Vysion (Vysis) assay. HER2 overexpression was found by IHC in 24.3%, HER2 amplification by CISH in 19.1% and by dPCR in 9.2% of the tumours. The overall concordance rate between CISH and IHC was 95.9%, between dPCR and IHC 85% and between CISH and FISH 100%, respectively. Among 25 HercepTest positive cases (score 3+) two showed no gene amplification and four out of 13 tumours with score 2+ were negative with CISH and FISH. The current study showed that CISH offers an ideal approach that allows detection of HER2 amplification in the context of morphology, whereas the major drawback of dPCR is the impracticability of tissue differentiation of invasive and non-invasive carcinoma.     

Added Value of HER-2 Amplification Testing by Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification in Invasive Breast Cancer

Background

HER-2 is a prognostic and predictive marker, but as yet no technique is perfectly able to identify patients likely to benefit from HER-2 targeted therapies. We aimed to prospectively assess the added value of first-line co-testing by IHC, and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) and chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH).

Methods

As local validation, HER-2 MLPA and CISH were compared in 99 breast cancers. Next, we reviewed 937 invasive breast cancers, from 4 Dutch pathology laboratories, that were prospectively assessed for HER-2 by IHC and MLPA (and CISH in selected cases).

Results

The validation study demonstrated 100% concordance between CISH and MLPA, if both methods were assessable and conclusive (81.8% of cases). Significant variation regarding percentages IHC 0/1+ and 2+ cases was observed between the laboratories (p<0.0001). Overall concordance between IHC and MLPA/CISH was 98.1% (575/586) (Kappa = 0.94). Of the IHC 3+ cases, 6.7% failed to reveal gene amplification, whereas 0.8% of the IHC 0/1+ cases demonstrated gene amplification. Results remained discordant after retrospective review in 3/11 discordant cases. In the remaining 8 cases the original IHC score was incorrect or adapted after repeated IHC staining.

Conclusions

MLPA is a low-cost and quantitative high-throughput technique with near perfect concordance with CISH. The use of MLPA in routinely co-testing all breast cancers may reduce HER-2 testing variation between laboratories, may serve as quality control for IHC, will reveal IHC 0/1+ patients with gene amplification, likely responsive to trastuzumab, and identify IHC 3+ cases without gene amplification that may respond less well.     

Immunocytochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization in HER-2/neu status in cell block preparations

OBJECTIVE: Recent studies have validated the use of cytologic materials to determine HER-2/neu status. Good concordance has been shown between results obtained by immunocytochemistry (ICC), immunohistochemistry (IHC), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on cytologic and surgical specimens. However, the utility of cytologic cell block material in determining HER-2/neu status has not been reported and is the subject of this study. STUDY DESIGN: HER-2/neu status was determined in 25 cases of primary or metastatic breast carcinoma by IHC and FISH. All cases were formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FPPE) cell block preparations. ICC was performed using monoclonal antibodies TAB250 (Zymed) and CB11 (Novacastra Laboratories). FISH analysis was performed using the PathVysion HER-2 probe kit (Vysis, Inc.). Results of ICC and FISH were compared in each case. RESULTS: Of 25 cases studied, 17 showed no protein overexpression or amplification. Five cases showed protein overexpression and amplification. The remaining 3 cases showed 2+ staining intensity by ICC in 10, 20, and 50% of carcinoma cells, respectively, and all demonstrated lack of amplification. CONCLUSION: Immunocytochemistry performed on FFPE cell block material is a reliable method for determining HER-2/neu status in cytologic specimens. We recommend routine preparation of FFPE cell block material in instances of suspected primary of metastatic breast carcinoma.     

Fully Automated Fluorescent in situ Hybridization (FISH) Staining and Digital Analysis of HER2 in Breast Cancer: A Validation Study

HER2 assessment is routinely used to select patients with invasive breast cancer that might benefit from HER2-targeted therapy. The aim of this study was to validate a fully automated in situ hybridization (ISH) procedure that combines the automated Leica HER2 fluorescent ISH system for Bond with supervised automated analysis with the Visia imaging D-Sight digital imaging platform. HER2 assessment was performed on 328 formalin-fixed/paraffin-embedded invasive breast cancer tumors on tissue microarrays (TMA) and 100 (50 selected IHC 2+ and 50 random IHC scores) full-sized slides of resections/biopsies obtained for diagnostic purposes previously. For digital analysis slides were pre-screened at 20x and 100x magnification for all fluorescent signals and supervised-automated scoring was performed on at least two pictures (in total at least 20 nuclei were counted) with the D-Sight HER2 FISH analysis module by two observers independently. Results were compared to data obtained previously with the manual Abbott FISH test. The overall agreement with Abbott FISH data among TMA samples and 50 selected IHC 2+ cases was 98.8% (κ = 0.94) and 93.8% (κ = 0.88), respectively. The results of 50 additionally tested unselected IHC cases were concordant with previously obtained IHC and/or FISH data. The combination of the Leica FISH system with the D-Sight digital imaging platform is a feasible method for HER2 assessment in routine clinical practice for patients with invasive breast cancer.     

Quantitative assessment of HER-2/neu protein concentration in breast cancer by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

PURPOSE: The HER-2/neu protein (p185) has become a promising target for antibody therapy in breast cancer. We tested the feasibility of a quantitative approach for HER-2/neu testing based on the analysis of tumor tissue extracts by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Tumor tissue extracts of primary human breast cancers (n=124) were prepared using a triton-based buffer. HER-2/neu concentration was quantified by ELISA. Paraffin-embedded tissue sections of the same tumors were analyzed by immunohistochemical staining applying the monoclonal HER-2/neu antibody TAB 250 (n=124) and by chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) (n=73). RESULTS: Concentrations of p185 in tissue extracts determined by ELISA varied from 1 to 927 ng per mg protein with a median of 25 ng/mg protein, whereas normal breast tissue showed values from 0.4 to 5.5 ng/mg with a median of 2.2 ng/mg (p<0.0001, Mann-Whitney U test). A significant correlation between p185 concentration and immunohistochemical staining was observed (p<0.0001, Kruskal-Wallis test). In addition, p185 concentration measured by ELISA was correlated with the degree of HER-2/neu gene amplification determined by CISH. HER-2/neu-amplified tumors had significantly higher p185 concentrations (median value 181 ng/mg protein) than non-amplified tumors (median value 20 ng/mg; p<0.0001, Mann-Whitney U test). CONCLUSIONS: ELISA-based measurement of HER-2/neu protein concentration in breast cancer tissue extracts is feasible and provides quantitative results for p185 protein concentrations that correlate closely with HER-2/neu immunoscore and gene amplification.     

HER-2/neu evaluation by fluorescence in situ hybridization on destained cytologic smears from primary and metastatic breast cancer

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate HER-2/neu amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) (HER-2/neu by FISH) on archival cytologic smears stained with May-Grünwald-Giemsa (MGG) stain. STUDY DESIGN: Cytologic specimens from 69 breast cancer lesions (48 primary and 21 metastatic), stained with MGG stain for routine diagnostic cytology, were destained and subjected to HER-2/neu by FISH. Fifteen of the 69 samples were also evaluated by FISH on paired fresh smears. RESULTS: HER-2/neu by FISH was successfully assayed in 25 of the 48 primary tumors and in 15 of the 21 metastatic lesions, corresponding to an overall feasibility of 58%. These cases had been archived between 1 month and 10 years prior to FISH analysis. Eight of the 25 primary and 5 of the 15 metastatic tumors were amplified. In 15 of the 40 evaluable cases, HER-2/neu was also assessed on the corresponding fresh smears: 8 tumors were amplified and 7 unamplified on both destained MGG and fresh smears. CONCLUSION: HER-2/neu can be detected by FISH on routinely MGG-stained cytologic slides. This approach allows HER-2/neu evaluation whenever histologic sections or fresh cytologic material are not available. In these cases, HER-2/neu assessment on destained cytologic smears plays a role in the selection of targeted therapy.     

HER-2 diagnostics

HER-2 (c-erbB2, neu) receptor is the molecular marker of ductal breast cancer although it is verexpressed in other adenocarcinoma as well (e.g.endometrial, colorectal and lung cancers). The increased receptor expression is most frequently (90-97%) due to gene amplification. Detection of the overexpression of HER-2 helps to determine prognosis, to predict chemoresistance and to select for Herceptin therapy. HER-2 overexpression can be estimated either by immunohistochemistry or by fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH). Standardization of the immunohistochemical HER-2 tests is the best in HercepTest DAKO), however, the frequent 2+level requires complementary FISH test to verify gene amplification. This combination is not necessary at low (0-1+) or high (3+) level of immunohistochemical reactions, because the correlation with gene amplification status is acceptably high. Recently several new anti-HER-2 antibodies have been introduced into HER-2 diagnostics in various countries. According to our experiences we recommend to combine rationally the immunohistochemistry and FISH techniques to determine the HER-2 status in breast cancer.     

Fluorescence in situ hybridization for HER-2/neu amplification of breast carcinoma in archival fine needle aspiration biopsy specimens

OBJECTIVE: To assess the usefulness of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for HER-2/neu amplification of breast carcinoma in archival fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) specimens. STUDY DESIGN: All FISH performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded surgical specimens during January 2003-August 2003 at the University of California Irvine Medical Center were selected. Prior FNABs were retrieved. One cytologic slide was destained in each case. The results were compared with those obtained on histologic specimens using the paired t test. RESULTS: FISH was performed on 41 surgical specimens of breast carcinoma. Thirteen patients had prior FNABs that were positive for adenocarcinoma. After hybridization on destained fine needle aspiration slides, no cells were found in 2 cases, and the results were not readable in 2 cases. In the remaining 9 cases, the results, expressed as the ratio of copies of the HER-2/neu gene to copies of the chromosome 17 centromere, were 5.10, 1.14, 1.21, 1.12, 0.74, 1.11, 1.21, 9.87 and 2.4. Results on the corresponding histologic specimens were 5.25, 1.05, 1.13, 1.22, 1.13, 1.12, 1.21, 9.35 and 2.61, respectively. No significant difference was found (p = 0.23). CONCLUSION: HER-2/neu amplification status by FISH can be accurately and reliably evaluated in existing archival cytologic slides.     

High-level detection of gene amplification and chromosome aneuploidy in extracted nuclei from paraffin-embedded tissue of human cancer using FISH: a new approach for retrospective studies

A novel application of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to isolated nuclei is described. The method detects gene amplification and chromosome aneuploidy in extracted nuclei from paraffin-embedded tissue of human cancer with greater sensitivity and specificity than existing FISH methods. In this study, the method is applied to signal detection of the HER-2/neu (c-erbB-2) gene, whose amplification is one of the most common genetic alterations associated with human breast cancer. Nuclei were extracted and isolated from formalin fixed, paraffin embedded tissue of 43 different carcinomas (breast, ovary, endometrium, gastrointestinal stromal tumor and malignant mesothelioma). FISH was performed both on sections and extracted nuclei of each tissue using chromosome enumeration probes (CEP) for the centromeric regions of chromosomes 8 and 17, and a locus specific identifier (LSI) for the HER-2/neu oncogene. Differences between ploidy calculated in sections and extracted nuclei were seen in 3 breast carcinomas and 1 gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Furthermore, 1 breast cancer, previously considered to be borderline for HER-2/neu gene amplification turned out to be clearly amplified. Nuclei extraction and isolation bypass all the problems related to signal interpretation in tissue sections, and the adoption of this new technique, which improves the signal quality in several neoplastic samples, is suggested.     

Discordant results obtained for different methods of HER-2/neu testing in breast cancer--a question of standardization, automation and timing

BACKGROUND: HER-2/neu positivity is required for the selection of stage IV breast cancer patients for trastuzumab therapy. We compared the results of the recommended immunohistochemistry (IHC) evaluation with the automated ACIS IHC system and with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). These HER-2/neu tissue results were correlated with the serum HER-2/neu (sHER-2/neu) levels at the time of metastatic spread. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 61 IHC slides from 30 patients were stained using the HercepTest. HER-2/neu gene amplification was determined using the Ventana FISH assay. sHER-2/neu levels were measured with the Oncogene Science" ELISA kit. The concordance of HER-2/neu results was determined using the concordance index Kappa (kappa). RESULTS: The best concordance between any IHC and FISH was found for the automated ACIS system (88.5%, kappa=0.68, category "good"). The comparison between the manual interpretations and the automated IHC was categorized as "very good" (95.1%, kappa=0.85). The median sHER-2/neu level of FISH positive patients was significantly higher (67 ng/mL) than that of FISH negative patients (17 ng/mL, p=0.018). The increase in HER-2/neu positivity comparing tissue to stage IV serum was statistically significant (p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The concordance between conventional IHC and computerized analysis was very good. The number of patients with stage IV breast cancer with an elevated sHER-2/neu level was much higher than HER-2/neu positivity in tissue. This discrepancy is only partially explained by the influence of tumor load. Patients with an elevated sHER-2/neu level and no tissue overexpression should be considered for retesting of tissue or a new biopsy.     

胃癌HER2蛋白表达及基因拷贝分析

目的：探讨胃癌组织HER2蛋白表达和基因拷贝数增加频率,以及蛋白表达与基因拷贝数之间的相关性。方法：分别采用免疫组织化学（1HC）和显色原位杂交（ClSH）方法,检测80例青岛人胃癌组织中HER2蛋白表达和基因扩增情况。结果：HER2免疫组织化学0者51例、1＋者12例、2＋者12例、3＋者5例。通过CISH分析：这组患者中HER2基因拷贝数扩增者共7例（8．8％）,其中包括基因临界扩增3例（3．8％）。HER2的蛋白表达与基因拷贝数增加相关（P〈0．05）,这两个指标与肿瘤分化程度相关。HER2免疫组织化学3＋和基因扩增结果一致,与乳腺癌相似。结论：这组患者中,具有较高的HER2蛋白表达和基因拷贝数增加的比率,基因扩增可能是其蛋白过表达的主要分子机制。     

Novel bright field molecular morphology methods for detection of <Emphasis Type="Italic">HER2</Emphasis> gene amplification

Profiling the amplification and over-expression of the HER2 gene is a key component for defining the prognosis and management of invasive breast carcinoma. Clinical laboratory testing for HER2 gene amplification and over expression has been complicated by an unacceptably high rate of false positive immunohistochemistry (IHC) results, poor reproducibility for the '2+' category of IHC scoring, and reluctant acceptance of alternative testing by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) by the diagnostic pathology community. Novel chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) assays have been developed that utilize bright field microscopy and a conventional light microscope for interpretation, but the analytical sensitivity of first generation CISH systems has been problematic. Novel second generation in situ hybridization detection methods based upon polymerized lg detection chemistry, autometallography or enzyme metallography, have been developed that routinely detect endogenous HER2 signals in normal cells (on slide hybridization control) and HER2 signals in both non-amplified and amplified patterns of HER2 genomic signatures. By combining the strength of polymerized peroxidase-labeled antibodies and metallography for gene amplification, with the detection of expression of HER2 encoded protein by IHC on the same slide, both HER2 gene amplification and protein over-expression can be simultaneously evaluated on a cell-by-cell basis in each microscopic field of carcinoma.     

Intra-tumor genetic heterogeneity and alternative driver genetic alterations in breast cancers with heterogeneous HER2 gene amplification

BackgroundHER2 is overexpressed and amplified in approximately 15% of invasive breast cancers, and is the molecular target and predictive marker of response to anti-HER2 agents. In a subset of these cases, heterogeneous distribution of HER2 gene amplification can be found, which creates clinically challenging scenarios. Currently, breast cancers with HER2 amplification/overexpression in just over 10% of cancer cells are considered HER2-positive for clinical purposes; however, it is unclear as to whether the HER2-negative components of such tumors would be driven by distinct genetic alterations. Here we sought to characterize the pathologic and genetic features of the HER2-positive and HER2-negative components of breast cancers with heterogeneous HER2 gene amplification and to define the repertoire of potential driver genetic alterations in the HER2-negative components of these cases.ResultsWe separately analyzed the HER2-negative and HER2-positive components of 12 HER2 heterogeneous breast cancers using gene copy number profiling and massively parallel sequencing, and identified potential driver genetic alterations restricted to the HER2-negative cells in each case. In vitro experiments provided functional evidence to suggest that BRF2 and DSN1 overexpression/amplification, and the HER2 I767M mutation may be alterations that compensate for the lack of HER2 amplification in the HER2-negative components of HER2 heterogeneous breast cancers.ConclusionsOur results indicate that even driver genetic alterations, such as HER2 gene amplification, can be heterogeneously distributed within a cancer, and that the HER2-negative components are likely driven by genetic alterations not present in the HER2-positive components, including BRF2 and DSN1 amplification and HER2 somatic mutations.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13059-015-0657-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.     

Comparison of multiplex ligation dependent probe amplification to immunohistochemistry for assessing HER-2/neu amplification in invasive breast cancer.

The HER-2/neu transmembrane tyrosine kinase receptor is both a prognostic marker and a therapeutic target for breast cancer. Accurate determination of HER-2/neu status is a prerequisite for selecting breast tumors for HER-2/neu immunotherapy or for taxan based chemotherapy. Unfortunately, there is no consensus concerning how this determination should be reached. We compared assessment of HER-2/neu status using Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) and immunohistochemistry (IHC). The patient group comprised 60 Indonesian breast cancers patients. IHC was performed on paraffin sections using the CB11 antibody from Novocastra. Results were scored according to the Hercept test. For MLPA, DNA was extracted from frozen samples, PCR amplified with a probe set containing three hemi-primer sets for the HER-2 locus and another nine control probes spread over chromosome 17 and other chromosomes, and analyzed on a gene scanner. A ratio above two for at least two HER-2 locus probes compared to the control probes was regarded as amplification. IHC for HER-2/neu was negative in 36 cases, and 24 cases (40%) showed expression. Seven, eight and nine of the latter cases were 1+, 2+ and 3+ positive, respectively. Forty-seven cases showed no amplification by MLPA, and 13 cases (22%) were amplified. Comparison of IHC and MPLA showed that none of the 36 IHC-negative or seven IHC 1+ cases was amplified. Five of the eight (63%) 2+ cases were amplified, and eight of nine (89%) of the IHC 3+ tumors showed gene amplification by MLPA assay. For HER-2/neu, there is a good correlation between gene amplification detected by MLPA and overexpression by IHC in invasive breast cancer. It appears that MLPA can detect the HER-2 amplified cases in the IHC 2+ class. Because MLPA is quick and inexpensive, it is an attractive method for detecting HER-2/neu amplification in daily laboratory practice.     

Assessment of HER2 Status Using Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) Techniques in Mucinous Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Comprehensive Comparison between ToGA Biopsy Method and ToGA Surgical Specimen Method

We aimed to compare the assay performance characteristics of HER2 status in mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) by ToGA (Trastuzumab for Gastric Cancer) biopsy versus ToGA surgical specimen methods. Forty-nine tissue microarray (TMA) samples of mucinous EOC from Asian women were analyzed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) tests using ToGA trial HER2 scoring methods. The overall concordance between IHC and FISH by the ToGA surgical specimen method is 97.56% and by the ToGA biopsy specimen method is 97.14%. The agreements of HER2 IHC results under both biopsy and surgical specimen methods were nearly perfect (weighted kappa = 0.845). Additionally, the percentage of Her2 FISH amplification showed increasing trend with increasing HER2 IHC ordinals (negative, equivocal, positive) by both TOGA biopsy (P<0.001) and surgical specimen method (P<0.001). After excluding equivocal cases, the sensitivity (100%), PPV (88.89%) and NPV (100%) of HER2 IHC were unchanged under either surgical specimen method or biopsy method. However, the specificity (96.97%) and accuracy (97.56%) of HER2 IHC was slightly higher under the surgical specimen method than those (specificity 96.30%, accuracy 97.14%) under the biopsy method. Of the total 49 cases, the number (n = 14) of HER2 IHC equivocal results under the ToGA biopsy method was 1.75-fold higher than those (n = 8) under the ToGA surgical specimen method (28.57% vs. 16.32%). Therefore, compared to ToGA surgery specimen method, the ToGA biopsy method caused more equivocal IHC cases to be referred to FISH testing and did not increase the detection rates of Her2 FISH amplification.     

Overexpression of HER2/neu oncoprotein in cytologic specimens

OBJECTIVE: To assess the rate of HER2/neu overexpression in cytologic specimens by immunocytochemistry (ICC) and compare these results in matched surgical specimens by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), when available. STUDY DESIGN: All cytologic specimens processed for HER2/neu evaluation by ICC (72 cases) and available corresponding histologic specimens (16 cases) were retrieved from our files. ICC was applied to previously Papanicolaou stained, routine fine needle aspirations specimens (64 cases) and cytocentrifuged, alcohol-fixed, fluid specimens (8 cases). FISH was performed on 6 histologic specimens. RESULTS: Overexpression of HER2/neu was seen in 7/22 breast cancers (31.8%), 3/18 pulmonary adenocarcinomas (16.6%), 2/5 colorectal adenocarcinomas (40%), 1/2 adenocarcinomas of the biliary system (50%), 1/3 thyroid papillary carcinomas (33.3%) and 1/3 prostate adenocarcinomas (33.3%). Sixteen cases had IHC in matched histologic specimens: 14 (87.5%) cases were concordant (11 negative and 3 positive in both specimens), 1 case was negative in the cytologic specimen and positive in the histologic specimen (with no amplification by FISH), and 1 case was positive in the cytologic specimen and negative in the histologic specimen (not informative by FISH). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that overexpression of HER2/neu oncoprotein can be successfully detected in routine cytologic specimens, providing a simple, fast and cost-effective method of selecting patients for specific treatment.     

HER-2/neu oncogene expression, DNA ploidy and proliferation index in breast cancer.

HER-2/neu gene expression, DNA ploidy and proliferation index were studied in 250 cases of breast cancer. Expression of HER-2/neu was determined by using an antibody to the HER-2/neu receptor. Ki-67 antibody was used to determine the proliferation index of the breast cancers, and the Feulgen method was used to assess DNA amounts in the tumor cells. Histochemical staining was quantitated by image analysis. Of the cancers studied, 72 were positive for overexpression of HER-2/neu protein; of these, 62 (86%) possessed near-tetraploid DNA content, and 47 (65%) had more than one G0G1 stem line (polyploid) of DNA distribution. Cells from the cases negative for HER/2-neu overexpression contained DNA amounts that ranged from diploid to varying degrees of aneuploid. A significant difference in the amounts of cellular proliferation in HER-2/neu overexpressing cancers was found between those that expressed the HER-2/neu receptor on their membranes and those that exhibited mainly cytoplasmic receptors.     

Effect of fixation period on HER2/neu gene amplification detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization in invasive breast carcinoma.

This study investigated if formalin fixation duration affects HER2/neu gene amplification detection by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in breast cancer. Tumor tissues from 35 cases were divided into three groups and subjected to two formalin fixation protocols per group (12 hr, 27 hr in the first; 2 hr, 17.5 hr in the second; 28.5 hr, 541 hr in the third) before FISH analysis. There was no significant difference in FISH signal detection between the two different fixation protocols in the first two groups. In the third, no signal was detected in 4/6 cases fixed for an extended duration.