Functional dissection of siRNA sequence by systematic DNA substitution: modified siRNA with a DNA seed arm is a powerful tool for mammalian gene silencing with significantly reduced off-target effect

Short interfering RNA (siRNA)-based RNA interference (RNAi) is widely used for target gene knockdown in mammalian cells. To clarify the position-dependent functions of ribonucleotides in siRNA, siRNAs with various DNA substitutions were constructed. The following could be simultaneously replaced with DNA without substantial loss of gene-silencing activity: the seed arm, which occupies positions 2–8 from the 5′end of the guide strand; its complementary sequence; the 5′end of the guide strand and the 3′overhang of the passenger strand. However, most part of the 3′ two-thirds of the guide strand could not be replaced with DNA, possibly due to binding of RNA-recognition proteins such as TRBP2 and Ago2. The passenger strand with DNA in the 3′end proximal region was incapable of inducing off-target effect. Owing to lesser stability of DNA–RNA hybrid than RNA duplex, modified siRNAs with DNA substitution in the seed region were, in most cases, incapable to exert unintended gene silencing due to seed sequence homology. Thus, it may be possible to design DNA–RNA chimeras which effectively silence mammalian target genes without silencing unintended genes.     

Hybridization of 2'-ribose modified mixed-sequence oligonucleotides: thermodynamic and kinetic studies

In this study, we characterize the thermodynamics of hybridization, binding kinetics and conformations of four ribose-modified (2′-fluoro, 2′-O-propyl, 2′-O-methoxyethyl and 2′-O-aminopropyl) decameric mixed-sequence oligonucleotides. Hybridization to the complementary non-modified DNA or RNA decamer was probed by fluorescence and circular-dichroism spectroscopy and compared to the same duplex formed between two non-modified strands. The thermal melting points of DNA–DNA duplexes were increased by 1.8, 2.2, 0.3 and 1.3°C for each propyl, methoxyethyl, aminopropyl and fluoro modification, respectively. In the case of DNA–RNA duplexes, the melting points were increased by 3.1, 4.1 and 1.0°C for each propyl, methoxyethyl and aminopropyl modification, respectively. The high stability of the duplexes formed with propyl-, methoxyethyl- and fluoro-modified oligonucleotides correlated with high preorganization in these single-strands. Despite higher thermodynamic duplex stability, hybridization kinetics to complementary DNA or RNA was slower for propyl- and methoxyethyl-modified oligonucleotides than for the non-modified control. In contrast, the positively-charged aminopropyl-modified oligonucleotide showed rapid binding to the complementary DNA or RNA.     

The solution structure of [d(CGC)r(aaa)d(TTTGCG)](2): hybrid junctions flanked by DNA duplexes

The solution structure and hydration of the chimeric duplex [d(CGC)r(aaa)d(TTTGCG)]₂, in which the central hybrid segment is flanked by DNA duplexes at both ends, was determined using two-dimensional NMR, simulated annealing and restrained molecular dynamics. The solution structure of this chimeric duplex differs from the previously determined X-ray structure of the analogous B-DNA duplex [d(CGCAAATTTGCG)]₂ as well as NMR structure of the analogous A-RNA duplex [r(cgcaaauuugcg)]₂. Long-lived water molecules with correlation time τ_c longer than 0.3 ns were found close to the RNA adenine H2 and H1′ protons in the hybrid segment. A possible long-lived water molecule was also detected close to the methyl group of 7T in the RNA–DNA junction but not with the other two thymines (8T and 9T). This result correlates with the structural studies that only DNA residue 7T in the RNA–DNA junction adopts an O4′-endo sugar conformation, while the other DNA residues including 3C in the DNA–RNA junction, adopt C1′-exo or C2′-endo conformations. The exchange rates for RNA C2′-OH were found to be ~5–20 s^–1. This slow exchange rate may be due to the narrow minor groove width of [d(CGC)r(aaa)d(TTTGCG)]₂, which may trap the water molecules and restrict the dynamic motion of hydroxyl protons. The minor groove width of [d(CGC)r(aaa)d(TTTGCG)]₂ is wider than its B-DNA analog but narrower than that of the A-RNA analog. It was further confirmed by its titration with the minor groove binding drug distamycin. A possible 2:1 binding mode was found by the titration experiments, suggesting that this chimeric duplex contains a wider minor groove than its B-DNA analog but still narrow enough to hold two distamycin molecules. These distinct structural features and hydration patterns of this chimeric duplex provide a molecular basis for further understanding the structure and recognition of DNA·RNA hybrid and chimeric duplexes.     

RNase H mediated cleavage of RNA by cyclohexene nucleic acid (CeNA)

Cyclohexene nucleic acid (CeNA) forms a duplex with RNA that is more stable than a DNA–RNA duplex (ΔT_m per modification: +2°C). A cyclohexenyl A nucleotide adopts a 3′-endo conformation when introduced in dsDNA. The neighbouring deoxynucleotide adopts an O4′-endo conformation. The CeNA:RNA duplex is cleaved by RNase H. The V_max and K_m of the cleavage reaction for CeNA:RNA and DNA:RNA is in the same range, although the k_cat value is about 600 times lower in the case of CeNA:RNA.     

Insights into structure, dynamics and hydration of locked nucleic acid (LNA) strand-based duplexes from molecular dynamics simulations

Locked nucleic acid (LNA) is a chemically modified nucleic acid with its sugar ring locked in an RNA-like (C3′-endo) conformation. LNAs show extraordinary thermal stabilities when hybridized with DNA, RNA or LNA itself. We performed molecular dynamics simulations on five isosequential duplexes (LNA–DNA, LNA–LNA, LNA–RNA, RNA–DNA and RNA–RNA) in order to characterize their structure, dynamics and hydration. Structurally, the LNA–DNA and LNA–RNA duplexes are found to be similar to regular RNA–DNA and RNA–RNA duplexes, whereas the LNA–LNA duplex is found to have its helix partly unwound and does not resemble RNA–RNA duplex in a number of properties. Duplexes with an LNA strand have on average longer interstrand phosphate distances compared to RNA–DNA and RNA–RNA duplexes. Furthermore, intrastrand phosphate distances in LNA strands are found to be shorter than in DNA and slightly shorter than in RNA. In case of induced sugar puckering, LNA is found to tune the sugar puckers in partner DNA strand toward C3′-endo conformations more efficiently than RNA. The LNA–LNA duplex has lesser backbone flexibility compared to the RNA–RNA duplex. Finally, LNA is less hydrated compared to DNA or RNA but is found to have a well-organized water structure.     

RecJ-like protein from Pyrococcus furiosus has 3′–5′ exonuclease activity on RNA: implications for proofreading of 3′-mismatched RNA primers in DNA replication

Replicative DNA polymerases require an RNA primer for leading and lagging strand DNA synthesis, and primase is responsible for the de novo synthesis of this RNA primer. However, the archaeal primase from Pyrococcus furiosus (Pfu) frequently incorporates mismatched nucleoside monophosphate, which stops RNA synthesis. Pfu DNA polymerase (PolB) cannot elongate the resulting 3′-mismatched RNA primer because it cannot remove the 3′-mismatched ribonucleotide. This study demonstrates the potential role of a RecJ-like protein from P. furiosus (PfRecJ) in proofreading 3′-mismatched ribonucleotides. PfRecJ hydrolyzes single-stranded RNA and the RNA strand of RNA/DNA hybrids in the 3′–5′ direction, and the kinetic parameters (K_m and K_cat) of PfRecJ during RNA strand digestion are consistent with a role in proofreading 3′-mismatched RNA primers. Replication protein A, the single-stranded DNA–binding protein, stimulates the removal of 3′-mismatched ribonucleotides of the RNA strand in RNA/DNA hybrids, and Pfu DNA polymerase can extend the 3′-mismatched RNA primer after the 3′-mismatched ribonucleotide is removed by PfRecJ. Finally, we reconstituted the primer-proofreading reaction of a 3′-mismatched ribonucleotide RNA/DNA hybrid using PfRecJ, replication protein A, Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and PolB. Given that PfRecJ is associated with the GINS complex, a central nexus in archaeal DNA replication fork, we speculate that PfRecJ proofreads the RNA primer in vivo.     

Detection of guanine-adenine mismatches by surface plasmon resonance sensor carrying naphthyridine-azaquinolone hybrid on the surface

We have discovered a new molecule naphthyridine–azaquinolone hybrid (Npt–Azq) that strongly stabilized the guanine-adenine (G-A) mismatch in duplex DNA. In the presence of Npt–Azq, the melting temperature (T_m) of 5′-d(CTA ACG GAA TG)-3′/3′-d(GAT TGA CTT AC)-5′ containing a single G-A mismatch increased by 15.4°C, whereas fully matched duplex increased its T_m only by 2.2°C. Npt–Azq was immobilized on the sensor surface for the surface plasmon resonance (SPR) assay to examine SPR detection of duplexes containing a G-A mismatch. Distinct SPR signals were observed when 27mer DNA containing a G-A mismatch was analyzed by the Npt–Azq immobilized sensor surfaces, whereas the signal of the fully matched duplex was ~6-fold weaker in intensity. The SPR signals for the G-A mismatch were proportional to the concentration of DNA in a range up to 1 µM, confirming that the SPR signal is in fact due to the binding of the G-A mismatch to Npt–Azq immobilized on the surface. Examination of all 16 G-A mismatches regarding the flanking sequence revealed that the sensor surface reported here is applicable to eight flanking sequences, covering 50% of all possible G-A mismatches.     

Hybridization of 2'-O-methyl and 2'-deoxy molecular beacons to RNA and DNA targets

Molecular beacons are stem–loop hairpin oligonucleotide probes labeled with a fluorescent dye at one end and a fluorescence quencher at the other end; they can differentiate between bound and unbound probes in homogeneous hybridization assays with a high signal-to-background ratio and enhanced specificity compared with linear oligonucleotide probes. However, in performing cellular imaging and quantification of gene expression, degradation of unmodified molecular beacons by endogenous nucleases can significantly limit the detection sensitivity, and results in fluorescence signals unrelated to probe/target hybridization. To substantially reduce nuclease degradation of molecular beacons, it is possible to protect the probe by substituting 2′-O-methyl RNA for DNA. Here we report the analysis of the thermodynamic and kinetic properties of 2′-O-methyl and 2′-deoxy molecular beacons in the presence of RNA and DNA targets. We found that in terms of molecular beacon/target duplex stability, 2′-O-methyl/RNA > 2′-deoxy/RNA > 2′-deoxy/DNA > 2′-O-methyl/DNA. The improved stability of the 2′-O-methyl/RNA duplex was accompanied by a slightly reduced specificity compared with the duplex of 2′-deoxy molecular beacons and RNA targets. However, the 2′-O-methyl molecular beacons hybridized to RNA more quickly than 2′-deoxy molecular beacons. For the pairs tested, the 2′-deoxy-beacon/DNA-target duplex showed the fastest hybridization kinetics. These findings have significant implications for the design and application of molecular beacons.     

Dimeric assembly of human Suv3 helicase promotes its RNA unwinding function in mitochondrial RNA degradosome for RNA decay

Human Suv3 is a unique homodimeric helicase that constitutes the major component of the mitochondrial degradosome to work cooperatively with exoribonuclease PNPase for efficient RNA decay. However, the molecular mechanism of how Suv3 is assembled into a homodimer to unwind RNA remains elusive. Here, we show that dimeric Suv3 preferentially binds to and unwinds DNA–DNA, DNA–RNA, and RNA–RNA duplexes with a long 3′ overhang (≥10 nucleotides). The C‐terminal tail (CTT)‐truncated Suv3 (Suv3ΔC) becomes a monomeric protein that binds to and unwinds duplex substrates with ~six to sevenfold lower activities relative to dimeric Suv3. Only dimeric Suv3, but not monomeric Suv3ΔC, binds RNA independently of ATP or ADP, and is capable of interacting with PNPase, indicating that dimeric Suv3 assembly ensures its continuous association with RNA and PNPase during ATP hydrolysis cycles for efficient RNA degradation. We further determined the crystal structure of the apo‐form of Suv3ΔC, and SAXS structures of dimeric Suv3 and PNPase–Suv3 complex, showing that dimeric Suv3 caps on the top of PNPase via interactions with S1 domains, and forms a dumbbell‐shaped degradosome complex with PNPase. Overall, this study reveals that Suv3 is assembled into a dimeric helicase by its CTT for efficient and persistent RNA binding and unwinding to facilitate interactions with PNPase, promote RNA degradation, and maintain mitochondrial genome integrity and homeostasis.     

Dissecting protein-RNA recognition sites

We analyze the protein–RNA interfaces in 81 transient binary complexes taken from the Protein Data Bank. Those with tRNA or duplex RNA are larger than with single-stranded RNA, and comparable in size to protein–DNA interfaces. The protein side bears a strong positive electrostatic potential and resembles protein–DNA interfaces in its amino acid composition. On the RNA side, the phosphate contributes less, and the sugar much more, to the interaction than in protein–DNA complexes. On average, protein–RNA interfaces contain 20 hydrogen bonds, 7 that involve the phosphates, 5 the sugar 2′OH, and 6 the bases, and 32 water molecules. The average H-bond density per unit buried surface area is less with tRNA or single-stranded RNA than with duplex RNA. The atomic packing is also less compact in interfaces with tRNA. On the protein side, the main chain NH and Arg/Lys side chains account for nearly half of all H-bonds to RNA; the main chain CO and side chain acceptor groups, for a quarter. The 2′OH is a major player in protein–RNA recognition, and shape complementarity an important determinant, whereas electrostatics and direct base–protein interactions play a lesser part than in protein–DNA recognition.     

Hydration of protein–RNA recognition sites

We investigate the role of water molecules in 89 protein–RNA complexes taken from the Protein Data Bank. Those with tRNA and single-stranded RNA are less hydrated than with duplex or ribosomal proteins. Protein–RNA interfaces are hydrated less than protein–DNA interfaces, but more than protein–protein interfaces. Majority of the waters at protein–RNA interfaces makes multiple H-bonds; however, a fraction do not make any. Those making H-bonds have preferences for the polar groups of RNA than its partner protein. The spatial distribution of waters makes interfaces with ribosomal proteins and single-stranded RNA relatively ‘dry’ than interfaces with tRNA and duplex RNA. In contrast to protein–DNA interfaces, mainly due to the presence of the 2′OH, the ribose in protein–RNA interfaces is hydrated more than the phosphate or the bases. The minor groove in protein–RNA interfaces is hydrated more than the major groove, while in protein–DNA interfaces it is reverse. The strands make the highest number of water-mediated H-bonds per unit interface area followed by the helices and the non-regular structures. The preserved waters at protein–RNA interfaces make higher number of H-bonds than the other waters. Preserved waters contribute toward the affinity in protein–RNA recognition and should be carefully treated while engineering protein–RNA interfaces.     

Selective Glutaraldehyde-Mediated Coupling of Proteins to the 3′-Adenine Terminus of Polymerase Chain Reaction Products

Attachment of proteins to the 3′ end of DNA increases stability of the DNA in serum and retards clearance of DNA by major organs, thereby enhancing in vivo half-life and therapeutic potential of DNA. Unfortunately, the length of DNA molecules that can be produced with 3 ′ modifications by solid-phase synthesis for protein attachment is limited to 45–60 nucleotides due to uncertainties about sequence fidelity for longer oligonucleotides. Here we describe selective covalent coupling of proteins or other molecules to the 3′-adenine overhang of unlabeled and fluorophore-labeled double-stranded polymerase chain reaction products putatively at the N⁶ position of adenine using 2.5% glutaraldehyde at pH 6.0 and 4°C for at least 16 h. Gel mobility shift analyses and fluorescence analyses of the shifted bands supported conjugate formation between double-stranded polymerase chain reaction products and β2-microglobulin. In addition, blunt-ended DNA ladder fragments treated with glutaraldehyde at 4°C showed no evidence of DNA–DNA or DNA–protein conjugate formation. With the present cold glutaraldehyde technique, longer DNA–3′-protein conjugates might be easily mass-produced. The protein portion of a DNA–3′-protein conjugate could possess functionality as well, such as receptor binding for cell entry, cytotoxicity, or opsonization.     

Unwinding of nucleic acids by HCV NS3 helicase is sensitive to the structure of the duplex

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) helicase, non-structural protein 3 (NS3), is proposed to aid in HCV genome replication and is considered a target for inhibition of HCV. In order to investigate the substrate requirements for nucleic acid unwinding by NS3, substrates were prepared by annealing a 30mer oligonucleotide to a 15mer. The resulting 15 bp duplex contained a single-stranded DNA overhang of 15 nt referred to as the bound strand. Other substrates were prepared in which the 15mer DNA was replaced by a strand of peptide nucleic acid (PNA). The PNA–DNA substrate was unwound by NS3, but the observed rate of strand separation was at least 25-fold slower than for the equivalent DNA–DNA substrate. Binding of NS3 to the PNA–DNA substrate was similar to the DNA–DNA substrate, due to the fact that NS3 initially binds to the single-stranded overhang, which was identical in each substrate. A PNA–RNA substrate was not unwound by NS3 under similar conditions. In contrast, morpholino–DNA and phosphorothioate–DNA substrates were utilized as efficiently by NS3 as DNA–DNA substrates. These results indicate that the PNA–DNA and PNA–RNA heteroduplexes adopt structures that are unfavorable for unwinding by NS3, suggesting that the unwinding activity of NS3 is sensitive to the structure of the duplex.     

Vaccinia topoisomerase and Cre recombinase catalyze direct ligation of activated DNA substrates containing a 3'-para-nitrophenyl phosphate ester

DNA topoisomerases and DNA site-specific recombinases are involved in a diverse set of cellular processes but both function by making transient breaks in DNA. Type IB topoisomerases and tyrosine recombinases cleave DNA by transesterification of an active site tyrosine to generate a DNA–3′-phosphotyrosyl–enzyme adduct and a free 5′-hydroxyl (5′-OH). Strand ligation results when the 5′-OH attacks the covalent complex and displaces the enzyme. We describe the synthesis of 3′-phospho-(para-nitrophenyl) oligonucleotides (3′-pNP DNAs), which mimic the natural 3′-phosphotyrosyl intermediate, and demonstrate that such pre-activated strands are substrates for DNA ligation by vaccinia topoisomerase and Cre recombinase. Ligation occurs by direct attack of a 5′-OH strand on the 3′-pNP DNA (i.e., without a covalent protein–DNA intermediate) and generates free para-nitrophenol as a product. The chromogenic DNA substrate allows ligation to be studied in real-time and in the absence of competing cleavage reactions and can be exploited for high-throughput screening of topoisomerase/recombinase inhibitors.