Structural and Functional Elements of the Promoter Encoded by the 5′ Untranslated Region of the Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis Virus Genome

Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus (VEEV) is one of the most pathogenic members of the Alphavirus genus in the Togaviridae family. The pathogenesis of this virus depends strongly on the sequences of the structural proteins and on the mutations in the RNA promoter encoded by the 5′ untranslated region (5′UTR) of the viral genome. In this study, we performed a detailed investigation of the structural and functional elements of the 5′-terminal promoter and analyzed the effect of multiple mutations introduced into the VEEV 5′UTR on virus and RNA replication. The results of this study demonstrate that RNA replication is determined by two synergistically functioning RNA elements. One of them is a very 5′-terminal AU dinucleotide, which is not involved in the stable RNA secondary structure, and the second is a short, G-C-rich RNA stem. An increase or decrease in the stem''s stability has deleterious effects on virus and RNA replication. In response to mutations in these RNA elements, VEEV replicative machinery was capable of developing new, compensatory sequences in the 5′UTR either containing 5′-terminal AUG or AU repeats or leading to the formation of new, heterologous stem-loops. Analysis of the numerous compensatory mutations suggested that at least two different mechanisms are involved in their generation. Some of the modifications introduced into the 5′ terminus of the viral genome led to an accumulation of the mutations in the VEEV nsPs, which suggested to us that there is a direct involvement of these proteins in promoter recognition. Furthermore, our data provide new evidence that the 3′ terminus of the negative-strand viral genome in the double-stranded RNA replicative intermediate is represented by a single-stranded RNA. Both the overall folding and the sequence determine its efficient function as a promoter for VEEV positive-strand RNA genome synthesis.Alphaviruses are a group of important human and animal pathogens. They are widely distributed both in the New and the Old Worlds and circulate between mosquito vectors and vertebrate hosts (45). In mosquitoes, they cause a persistent, life-long infection characterized by virus accumulation in salivary glands, which is required for infecting vertebrate hosts during a blood meal (50). In vertebrates, alphaviruses develop high-titer viremia, and their replication induces a variety of diseases with symptoms depending on both the host and the causative virus (11). Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus (VEEV), the New World alphavirus, is one of the most pathogenic members of the genus (16, 45). Representatives of the VEEV serocomplex circulate in Central, South, and North America and cause severe, and sometimes fatal, encephalitis in humans and horses (3, 11, 16, 24). Accordingly, VEEV represents a serious public health threat in the United States (39, 48, 51, 53), and during VEEV epizootics, equine mortality can reach 83%, and in humans, neurological diseases can be detected in up to 14% of all infected individuals, especially children (15). The overall mortality rate for humans is below 1%, but it is usually higher among children, the elderly, and, most likely, immunocompromised individuals (49). In spite of the continuous threat of VEEV epidemics, the biology of this virus, its pathogenesis, and the mechanism of replication are insufficiently understood. To date, no safe and efficient vaccine and therapeutic means have been developed for this pathogen.The VEEV genome is represented by a single-stranded, almost 11.5-kb-long RNA molecule of positive polarity. This RNA mimics the structure of cellular mRNAs by containing a cap at the 5′ ends and a poly(A) tail at the 3′ ends of the genome (18). The genomic RNA encodes two polyproteins: the 5′-terminal open reading frame (ORF) is translated into viral nonstructural proteins (nsP1 to nsP4), forming the replication enzyme complex (RC). The second ORF corresponds to the 3′-terminal one-third of the genome and encodes all of the viral structural proteins, C, E2, and E1. The latter proteins are translated from the subgenomic RNA synthesized during virus replication (45).The replication of the alphavirus genome is a highly regulated, multistep process, which includes the synthesis of three different RNA species (45). The regulation of their synthesis is achieved by differential processing of viral nsPs (22, 23, 43). First, the initially synthesized nonstructural polyprotein is partially processed by the nsP2-associated protease into P123 and nsP4, and this complex is active in negative-strand RNA synthesis (22). The latter RNA is present in the double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) replicative intermediate and is associated with plasma membrane and endosome-like vesicular organelles (8). Further processing of the polyproteins into individual nsP1 to nsP4 makes the RC capable of the synthesis of the positive-strand genome and subgenomic RNA but not of negative-strand RNA (23, 41, 42). Thus, the completely processed nsPs utilize only the promoters located on the negative strand of the viral genome.The defined promoters in the alphavirus genomes include (i) a 3′-terminal 19-nucleotide (nt)-long, conserved sequence element (CSE) adjacent to the poly(A) tail (12, 13, 19); (ii) the subgenomic promoter in the negative-strand copy of the viral genome (25); and (iii) the promoter for the synthesis of the positive-strand viral genome (45). The latter promoter is located at the 3′ end of the negative strand of the viral genome and has a complex structure. The two identified elements include the sequence, encoded by the 5′ untranslated region (5′UTR) (a core promoter) (5, 9, 32), and a 51-nt CSE, found ∼150 nt downstream of the genome''s 5′ terminus in the nsP1-encoding sequence. Our previous results and those of other research groups demonstrated that the 51-nt CSE functions as a replication enhancer in a virus- and cell-dependent mode (4, 33). Clustered mutations in the VEEV 51-nt CSE or its complete deletion either had deleterious effects on RNA replication or completely abolished RNA synthesis (30). However, RNA replication was ultimately recovered due to an accumulation of compensatory, adaptive mutations in either VEEV nsP2 or nsP3 (30). Thus, the 51-nt CSE in the VEEV genome is not absolutely essential for virus replication, but its presence is highly beneficial for achieving the most efficient growth rates in cells of both vertebrate and invertebrate origins. Alphavirus core promoters demonstrate a very low level of sequence conservation and also function in cell- and virus-specific modes (9). Previous studies suggested that the sequence and/or secondary structure of the VEEV core promoter plays a critical role in virus pathogenesis, and the G3→A (A3) mutation, found in an attenuated strain of VEEV TC-83, is one of the determinants of its less pathogenic phenotype (17, 55). However, information about functional elements of the VEEV core promoter remains incomplete, and its structural and functional elements have not yet been dissected.In this study, we applied a combination of molecular approaches to further define the functional components of the VEEV 5′UTR-specific core promoter, which mediates positive-strand genome synthesis. Our results demonstrate the presence of three structural RNA elements, two of which synergistically determine promoter activity. The first element of the promoter is a very short, 5′-terminal sequence, which is not involved in a stable secondary structure. Point mutations in the very 5′-terminal nucleotides have a deleterious effect on genome RNA replication. The second element is the short RNA stem, located in close proximity to the 5′ end of the genome. Mutations changing either the stability or sequence of the stem strongly affect virus replication and cause its rapid evolution, leading to the appearance of heterologous repeating elements in the unpaired 5′ terminus or the generation of other sequences that might potentially fold into stem structures. Surprisingly, the third structural RNA element, the loop, appears to play no important role in RNA replication and can be replaced either by a shorter loop or by the loop having a heterologous sequence without a detectable effect on virus and RNA replication.     

Time-Dependent Transformation of the Herpesvirus Tegument

All herpesviruses have a layer of protein called the tegument that lies between the virion membrane and the capsid. The tegument consists of multiple, virus-encoded protein species that together can account for nearly half the total virus protein. To clarify the structure of the tegument and its attachment to the capsid, we used electron microscopy and protein analysis to examine the tegument of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1). Electron microscopic examination of intact virions revealed that whereas the tegument was asymmetrically distributed around the capsid in extracellular virions, it was symmetrically arranged in cell-associated virus. Examination of virions after treatment with nonionic detergent demonstrated that: (i) in extracellular virus the tegument was resistant to removal with Triton X-100 (TX-100), whereas it was lost nearly completely when cell-associated virus was treated in the same way; (ii) the tegument in TX-100-treated extracellular virions was asymmetrically distributed around the capsid as it is in unextracted virus; and (iii) in some images, tegument was seen to be linked to the capsid by short, regularly spaced connectors. Further analysis was carried out with extracellular virus harvested from cells at different times after infection. It was observed that while the amount of tegument present in virions was not affected by time of harvest, the amount remaining after TX-100 treatment increased markedly as the time of harvest was increased from 24 h to 64 h postinfection. The results support the view that HSV-1 virions undergo a time-dependent change in which the tegument is transformed from a state in which it is symmetrically organized around the capsid and extractable with TX-100 to a state where it is asymmetrically arranged and resistant to extraction.All herpesviruses have a tegument, a layer of protein located between the virus membrane and the capsid. Depending on the virus species, the tegument can be 20 to 40 nm in thickness, and it may be uniformly or asymmetrically distributed about the capsid (7, 17, 24, 33). The tegument is composed predominantly of virus-encoded proteins that together can account for up to half or more of the total virion protein mass. Tegument proteins are thought to be those involved in the early stages of infection before progeny virus proteins are synthesized.The tegument has been most thoroughly studied in herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1). Examination of virions by electron microscopy has demonstrated that the tegument is not highly structured. Its morphology is described as predominantly granular with fibrous elements also present (7, 19). Analysis by cryo-electron microscopy, followed by icosahedral reconstruction has shown that the tegument is not icosahedrally ordered, although a small amount of tegument density is observed close to the capsid surface at the pentons (3, 47).The HSV-1 tegument is composed of approximately 20 distinct, virus-encoded protein species whose amounts vary considerably. The predominant components are UL47, UL48, and UL49, each of which occurs in more than 800 copies per virion (8, 46). In contrast, others, such as RL2 (ICP0), RS1 (ICP4), UL36, and UL37, occur in ∼100 copies or less. Trace amounts of host cell-encoded proteins are also present (15). Many of the tegument proteins are required for virus replication (34), and functions have been defined for most (9, 12, 31, 40).Biochemical studies have demonstrated that the tegument makes noncovalent contacts with both the virus capsid and the membrane. Studies of capsid-tegument contacts have emphasized binding of UL36, a tegument protein, to UL25, a capsid protein located near the vertices and involved in DNA encapsidation (5, 20, 29). Other tegument proteins such as UL48 (VP16), UL37, and UL49 (VP22) are found to associate with UL36 and may be bound to the capsid indirectly by way of UL36 (13, 44). UL16 binds reversibly to the capsid while UL46 (VP11/12) has been shown to bind to both the membrane and the capsid (21, 22, 26). Binding of tegument proteins to the membrane has been shown to occur by way of attachment to UL11 (45) and also to the internal domains of membrane glycoproteins, including glycoprotein D (gD), gH, and gE (4, 6, 11).We describe here the results of a study in which electron microscopy and protein analysis were used to clarify the structure of the HSV-1 tegument and its attachment to the capsid. The study was designed to extend the observation that most of the HSV-1 tegument remains attached to the capsid when the membrane is removed from the virus by treatment with nonionic detergent (19). Cell-associated and extracellular virions were compared after treatment with Triton X-100 (TX-100).     

Characterization of a Putative Ancestor of Coxsackievirus B5

Like other RNA viruses, coxsackievirus B5 (CVB5) exists as circulating heterogeneous populations of genetic variants. In this study, we present the reconstruction and characterization of a probable ancestral virion of CVB5. Phylogenetic analyses based on capsid protein-encoding regions (the VP1 gene of 41 clinical isolates and the entire P1 region of eight clinical isolates) of CVB5 revealed two major cocirculating lineages. Ancestral capsid sequences were inferred from sequences of these contemporary CVB5 isolates by using maximum likelihood methods. By using Bayesian phylodynamic analysis, the inferred VP1 ancestral sequence dated back to 1854 (1807 to 1898). In order to study the properties of the putative ancestral capsid, the entire ancestral P1 sequence was synthesized de novo and inserted into the replicative backbone of an infectious CVB5 cDNA clone. Characterization of the recombinant virus in cell culture showed that fully functional infectious virus particles were assembled and that these viruses displayed properties similar to those of modern isolates in terms of receptor preferences, plaque phenotypes, growth characteristics, and cell tropism. This is the first report describing the resurrection and characterization of a picornavirus with a putative ancestral capsid. Our approach, including a phylogenetics-based reconstruction of viral predecessors, could serve as a starting point for experimental studies of viral evolution and might also provide an alternative strategy for the development of vaccines.The group B coxsackieviruses (CVBs) (serotypes 1 to 6) were discovered in the 1950s in a search for new poliovirus-like viruses (33, 61). Infections caused by CVBs are often asymptomatic but may occasionally result in severe diseases of the heart, pancreas, and central nervous system (99). CVBs are small icosahedral RNA viruses belonging to the Human enterovirus B (HEV-B) species within the family Picornaviridae (89). In the positive single-stranded RNA genome, the capsid proteins VP1 to VP4 are encoded within the P1 region, whereas the nonstructural proteins required for virus replication are encoded within the P2 and P3 regions (4). The 30-nm capsid has an icosahedral symmetry and consists of 60 copies of each of the four structural proteins. The VP1, VP2, and VP3 proteins are surface exposed, whereas the VP4 protein lines the interior of the virus capsid (82). The coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor (CAR), a cell adhesion molecule of the immunoglobulin superfamily, serves as the major cell surface attachment molecule for all six serotypes of CVB (5, 6, 39, 60, 98). Some strains of CVB1, CVB3 and CVB5 also interact with the decay-accelerating factor (DAF) (CD55), a member of the family of proteins that regulate the complement cascade. However, the attachment of CVBs to DAF alone does not permit the infection of cells (6, 7, 59, 85).Picornaviruses exist as genetically highly diverse populations within their hosts, referred to as quasispecies (20, 57). This genetic plasticity enables these viruses to adapt rapidly to new environments, but at the same time, it may compromise the structural integrity and enzymatic functionality of the virus. The selective constraints imposed on the picornavirus genome are reflected in the different regions used for different types of evolutionary studies. The highly conserved RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (3D^pol) gene is used to establish phylogenetic relationships between more-distantly related viruses (e.g., viruses belonging to different genera) (38), whereas the variable genomic sequence encoding the VP1 protein is used for the classification of serotypes (13, 14, 69, 71, 72).In 1963, Pauling and Zuckerkandl proposed that comparative analyses of contemporary protein sequences can be used to predict the sequences of their ancient predecessors (73). Experimental reconstruction of ancestral character states has been applied to evolutionary studies of several different proteins, e.g., galectins (49), G protein-coupled receptors (52), alcohol dehydrogenases (95), rhodopsins (15), ribonucleases (46, 88, 110), elongation factors (32), steroid receptors (10, 96, 97), and transposons (1, 45, 87). In the field of virology, reconstructed ancestral or consensus protein sequences have been used in attempts to develop vaccine candidates for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (21, 51, 66, 81) but rarely to examine general phenotypic properties.In this study, a CVB5 virus with a probable ancestral virion (CVB5-P1anc) was constructed and characterized. We first analyzed in detail the evolutionary relationships between structural genes of modern CVB5 isolates and inferred a time scale for their evolutionary history. An ancestral virion sequence was subsequently inferred by using a maximum likelihood (ML) method. This sequence was then synthesized de novo, cloned into a replicative backbone of an infectious CVB5 cDNA clone, and transfected into HeLa cells. The hypothetical CVB5-P1anc assembled into functional virus particles that displayed phenotypic properties similar to those of contemporary clinical isolates. This is the first report describing the reconstruction and characterization of a fully functional picornavirus with a putative ancestral capsid.     

Cell-to-Cell Spread of the RNA Interference Response Suppresses Semliki Forest Virus (SFV) Infection of Mosquito Cell Cultures and Cannot Be Antagonized by SFV

In their vertebrate hosts, arboviruses such as Semliki Forest virus (SFV) (Togaviridae) generally counteract innate defenses and trigger cell death. In contrast, in mosquito cells, following an early phase of efficient virus production, a persistent infection with low levels of virus production is established. Whether arboviruses counteract RNA interference (RNAi), which provides an important antiviral defense system in mosquitoes, is an important question. Here we show that in Aedes albopictus-derived mosquito cells, SFV cannot prevent the establishment of an antiviral RNAi response or prevent the spread of protective antiviral double-stranded RNA/small interfering RNA (siRNA) from cell to cell, which can inhibit the replication of incoming virus. The expression of tombusvirus siRNA-binding protein p19 by SFV strongly enhanced virus spread between cultured cells rather than virus replication in initially infected cells. Our results indicate that the spread of the RNAi signal contributes to limiting virus dissemination.In animals, RNA interference (RNAi) was first described for Caenorhabditis elegans (27). The production or introduction of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) in cells leads to the degradation of mRNAs containing homologous sequences by sequence-specific cleavage of mRNAs. Central to RNAi is the production of 21- to 26-nucleotide small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) from dsRNA and the assembly of an RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), followed by the degradation of the target mRNA (23, 84). RNAi is a known antiviral strategy of plants (3, 53) and insects (21, 39, 51). Study of Drosophila melanogaster in particular has given important insights into RNAi responses against pathogenic viruses and viral RNAi inhibitors (31, 54, 83, 86, 91). RNAi is well characterized for Drosophila, and orthologs of antiviral RNAi genes have been found in Aedes and Culex spp. (13, 63).Arboviruses, or arthropod-borne viruses, are RNA viruses mainly of the families Bunyaviridae, Flaviviridae, and Togaviridae. The genus Alphavirus within the family Togaviridae contains several mosquito-borne pathogens: arboviruses such as Chikungunya virus (16) and equine encephalitis viruses (88). Replication of the prototype Sindbis virus and Semliki Forest virus (SFV) is well understood (44, 71, 74, 79). Their genome consists of a positive-stranded RNA with a 5′ cap and a 3′ poly(A) tail. The 5′ two-thirds encodes the nonstructural polyprotein P1234, which is cleaved into four replicase proteins, nsP1 to nsP4 (47, 58, 60). The structural polyprotein is encoded in the 3′ one-third of the genome and cleaved into capsid and glycoproteins after translation from a subgenomic mRNA (79). Cytoplasmic replication complexes are associated with cellular membranes (71). Viruses mature by budding at the plasma membrane (35).In nature, arboviruses are spread by arthropod vectors (predominantly mosquitoes, ticks, flies, and midges) to vertebrate hosts (87). Little is known about how arthropod cells react to arbovirus infection. In mosquito cell cultures, an acute phase with efficient virus production is generally followed by the establishment of a persistent infection with low levels of virus production (9). This is fundamentally different from the cytolytic events following arbovirus interactions with mammalian cells and pathogenic insect viruses with insect cells. Alphaviruses encode host response antagonists for mammalian cells (2, 7, 34, 38).RNAi has been described for mosquitoes (56) and, when induced before infection, antagonizes arboviruses and their replicons (1, 4, 14, 15, 29, 30, 32, 42, 64, 65). RNAi is also functional in various mosquito cell lines (1, 8, 43, 49, 52). In the absence of RNAi, alphavirus and flavivirus replication and/or dissemination is enhanced in both mosquitoes and Drosophila (14, 17, 31, 45, 72). RNAi inhibitors weakly enhance SFV replicon replication in tick and mosquito cells (5, 33), posing the questions of how, when, and where RNAi interferes with alphavirus infection in mosquito cells.Here we use an A. albopictus-derived mosquito cell line to study RNAi responses to SFV. Using reporter-based assays, we demonstrate that SFV cannot avoid or efficiently inhibit the establishment of an RNAi response. We also demonstrate that the RNAi signal can spread between mosquito cells. SFV cannot inhibit cell-to-cell spread of the RNAi signal, and spread of the virus-induced RNAi signal (dsRNA/siRNA) can inhibit the replication of incoming SFV in neighboring cells. Furthermore, we show that SFV expression of a siRNA-binding protein increases levels of virus replication mainly by enhancing virus spread between cells rather than replication in initially infected cells. Taken together, these findings suggest a novel mechanism, cell-to-cell spread of antiviral dsRNA/siRNA, by which RNAi limits SFV dissemination in mosquito cells.     

Replacement of the Replication Factors of Porcine Circovirus (PCV) Type 2 with Those of PCV Type 1 Greatly Enhances Viral Replication In Vitro

Porcine circovirus type 1 (PCV1), originally isolated as a contaminant of PK-15 cells, is nonpathogenic, whereas porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) causes an economically important disease in pigs. To determine the factors affecting virus replication, we constructed chimeric viruses by swapping open reading frame 1 (ORF1) (rep) or the origin of replication (Ori) between PCV1 and PCV2 and compared the replication efficiencies of the chimeric viruses in PK-15 cells. The results showed that the replication factors of PCV1 and PCV2 are fully exchangeable and, most importantly, that both the Ori and rep of PCV1 enhance the virus replication efficiencies of the chimeric viruses with the PCV2 backbone.Porcine circovirus (PCV) is a single-stranded DNA virus in the family Circoviridae (34). Type 1 PCV (PCV1) was discovered in 1974 as a contaminant of porcine kidney cell line PK-15 and is nonpathogenic in pigs (31-33). Type 2 PCV (PCV2) was discovered in piglets with postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome (PMWS) in the mid-1990s and causes porcine circovirus-associated disease (PCVAD) (1, 9, 10, 25). PCV1 and PCV2 have similar genomic organizations, with two major ambisense open reading frames (ORFs) (16). ORF1 (rep) encodes two viral replication-associated proteins, Rep and Rep′, by differential splicing (4, 6, 21, 22). The Rep and Rep′ proteins bind to specific sequences within the origin of replication (Ori) located in the intergenic region, and both are responsible for viral replication (5, 7, 8, 21, 23, 28, 29). ORF2 (cap) encodes the immunogenic capsid protein (Cap) (26). PCV1 and PCV2 share approximately 80%, 82%, and 62% nucleotide sequence identity in the Ori, rep, and cap, respectively (19).In vitro studies using a reporter gene-based assay system showed that the replication factors of PCV1 and PCV2 are functionally interchangeable (2-6, 22), although this finding has not yet been validated in a live infectious-virus system. We have previously shown that chimeras of PCV in which cap has been exchanged between PCV1 and PCV2 are infectious both in vitro and in vivo (15), and an inactivated vaccine based on the PCV1-PCV2 cap (PCV1-cap2) chimera is used in the vaccination program against PCVAD (13, 15, 18, 27).PCV1 replicates more efficiently than PCV2 in PK-15 cells (14, 15); thus, we hypothesized that the Ori or rep is directly responsible for the differences in replication efficiencies. The objectives of this study were to demonstrate that the Ori and rep are interchangeable between PCV1 and PCV2 in a live-virus system and to determine the effects of swapped heterologous replication factors on virus replication efficiency in vitro.     

A Targeted Analysis of Cellular Chaperones Reveals Contrasting Roles for Heat Shock Protein 70 in Flock House Virus RNA Replication

Cytosolic chaperones are a diverse group of ubiquitous proteins that play central roles in multiple processes within the cell, including protein translation, folding, intracellular trafficking, and quality control. These cellular proteins have also been implicated in the replication of numerous viruses, although the full extent of their involvement in viral replication is unknown. We have previously shown that the heat shock protein 40 (hsp40) chaperone encoded by the yeast YDJ1 gene facilitates RNA replication of flock house virus (FHV), a well-studied and versatile positive-sense RNA model virus. To further explore the roles of chaperones in FHV replication, we examined a panel of 30 yeast strains with single deletions of cytosolic proteins that have known or hypothesized chaperone activity. We found that the majority of cytosolic chaperone deletions had no impact on FHV RNA accumulation, with the notable exception of J-domain-containing hsp40 chaperones, where deletion of APJ1 reduced FHV RNA accumulation by 60%, while deletion of ZUO1, JJJ1, or JJJ2 markedly increased FHV RNA accumulation, by 4- to 40-fold. Further studies using cross complementation and double-deletion strains revealed that the contrasting effects of J domain proteins were reproduced by altering expression of the major cytosolic hsp70s encoded by the SSA and SSB families and were mediated in part by divergent effects on FHV RNA polymerase synthesis. These results identify hsp70 chaperones as critical regulators of FHV RNA replication and indicate that cellular chaperones can have both positive and negative regulatory effects on virus replication.The compact genomes of viruses relative to those of other infectious agents restrict their ability to encode all proteins required to complete their replication cycles. To circumvent this limitation, viruses often utilize cellular factors or processes to complete essential steps in replication. One group of cellular proteins frequently targeted by viruses are cellular chaperones, which include a diverse set of heat shock proteins (hsps) that normally facilitate cellular protein translation, folding, trafficking, and degradation (18, 64). The connection between viruses and cellular chaperones was originally identified in bacteria, where the Escherichia coli hsp40 and hsp70 homologues, encoded by dnaJ and dnaK, respectively, were identified as bacterial genes essential for bacteriophage λ DNA replication (62). Research over the past 30 years has further revealed the importance of cellular chaperones in viral replication, such that the list of virus-hsp connections is now quite extensive and includes viruses from numerous families with diverse genome structures (4, 6, 7, 16, 19, 20, 23, 25, 40, 41, 44, 51, 54, 60). These studies have demonstrated the importance of cellular chaperones in multiple steps of the viral life cycle, including entry, viral protein translation, genome replication, encapsidation, and virion release. However, the list of virus-hsp connections is likely incomplete. Further studies to explore this particular host-pathogen interaction will shed light on virus replication mechanisms and pathogenesis, and potentially highlight targets for novel antiviral agents.To study the role of cellular chaperones in the genome replication of positive-sense RNA viruses, we use flock house virus (FHV), a natural insect pathogen and well-studied member of the Nodaviridae family. The FHV life cycle shares many common features with other positive-sense RNA viruses, including the membrane-specific targeting and assembly of functional RNA replication complexes (37, 38), the exploitation of various cellular processes and host factors for viral replication (5, 23, 60), and the induction of large-scale membrane rearrangements (24, 28, 38, 39). FHV virions contain a copackaged bipartite genome consisting of RNA1 (3.1 kb) and RNA2 (1.4 kb), which encode protein A, the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, and the structural capsid protein precursor, respectively (1). During active genome replication, FHV produces a subgenomic RNA3 (0.4 kb), which encodes the RNA interference inhibitor protein B2 (12, 29, 32). These viral characteristics make FHV an excellent model system to study many aspects of positive-sense RNA virus biology.In addition to the benefits of a simple genome, FHV is able to establish robust RNA replication in a wide variety of genetically tractable eukaryotic hosts, including Drosophila melanogaster (38), Caenorhabditis elegans (32), and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (46). The budding yeast S. cerevisiae has been an exceptionally useful model host to study the mechanisms of viral RNA replication complex assembly and function with FHV (31, 37, 39, 45, 53, 55, 56, 60) as well as other positive-sense RNA viruses (11). The facile genetics of S. cerevisiae, along with the vast array of well-defined cellular and molecular tools and techniques, make it an ideal eukaryotic host for the identification of cellular factors required for positive-sense RNA virus replication. Furthermore, readily available yeast libraries with deletions and regulated expression of individual proteins have led to the completion of several high-throughput screens to provide a global survey of host factors that impact virus replication (26, 42, 52). An alternative approach with these yeast libraries that reduces the inherently high false-negative rates associated with high-throughput screens is to focus on a select set of host genes associated with a particular cellular pathway, process, or location previously implicated in virus replication.We have utilized such a targeted approach and focused on examining the impact of cytosolic chaperones on FHV RNA replication. Previously, we have shown that the cellular chaperone hsp90 facilitates protein A synthesis in Drosophila cells (5, 23), and the hsp40 encoded by the yeast YDJ1 gene facilitates FHV RNA replication in yeast, in part through effects on both protein A accumulation and function (60). In this report, we further extend these observations by examining FHV RNA accumulation in a panel of yeast strains with deletions of known or hypothesized cytosolic chaperones. We demonstrate that cytosolic chaperones can have either suppressive or enhancing effects on FHV RNA accumulation. In particular, related hsp70 members encoded by the SSA and SSB yeast chaperone families have marked and dramatically divergent effects on both genomic and subgenomic RNA accumulation and viral polymerase synthesis. These results highlight the complexities of the host-pathogen interactions that influence positive-sense RNA virus replication and identify the hsp70 family of cytosolic chaperones as key regulators of FHV replication.     

Low Endocytic pH and Capsid Protein Autocleavage Are Critical Components of Flock House Virus Cell Entry

The process by which nonenveloped viruses cross cell membranes during host cell entry remains poorly defined; however, common themes are emerging. Here, we use correlated in vivo and in vitro studies to understand the mechanism of Flock House virus (FHV) entry and membrane penetration. We demonstrate that low endocytic pH is required for FHV infection, that exposure to acidic pH promotes FHV-mediated disruption of model membranes (liposomes), and particles exposed to low pH in vitro exhibit increased hydrophobicity. In addition, FHV particles perturbed by heating displayed a marked increase in liposome disruption, indicating that membrane-active regions of the capsid are exposed or released under these conditions. We also provide evidence that autoproteolytic cleavage, to generate the lipophilic γ peptide (4.4 kDa), is required for membrane penetration. Mutant, cleavage-defective particles failed to mediate liposome lysis, regardless of pH or heat treatment, suggesting that these particles are not able to expose or release the requisite membrane-active regions of the capsid, namely, the γ peptides. Based on these results, we propose an updated model for FHV entry in which (i) the virus enters the host cell by endocytosis, (ii) low pH within the endocytic pathway triggers the irreversible exposure or release of γ peptides from the virus particle, and (iii) the exposed/released γ peptides disrupt the endosomal membrane, facilitating translocation of viral RNA into the cytoplasm.Flock House virus (FHV), a nonenveloped, positive-sense RNA virus, has been employed as a model system in several important studies to address a wide range of biological questions (reviewed in reference 55). FHV has been instrumental in understanding virus structure and assembly (17, 19, 45), RNA replication (2, 3, 37), and specific packaging of the genome (33, 44, 53, 54). Studies of FHV infection in Drosophila melanogaster flies have provided valuable information about the antiviral innate immune response in invertebrate hosts (29, 57). FHV is also used in nanotechnology applications as an epitope-presenting platform to develop novel vaccines and medical therapies (31, 48). In this report, we use FHV as a model system to further elucidate the means by which nonenveloped viruses enter host cells and traverse cellular membranes.During cell entry enveloped and nonenveloped viral capsid proteins undergo structural rearrangements that enable the virus to breach the membrane bilayer, ultimately releasing the viral genome or nucleocapsid into the cytoplasm. These entry-related conformational changes have been well characterized for enveloped viruses, which use membrane fusion to cross membrane bilayers (reviewed in reference 59). However, the mechanisms nonenveloped viruses employ to breach cellular membranes are poorly defined. Recently, significant parallels in the mechanisms of cell entry have emerged for a diverse group of nonenveloped viruses. Specifically, programmed capsid disassembly and release of small membrane-interacting peptides appear to be a common theme (reviewed in references 4 and 50).The site of membrane penetration depends upon the route of virus entry into the cell. Viruses can enter host cells via several distinct pathways, including clathrin-mediated endocytosis, caveolae-mediated endocytosis, lipid raft-mediated endocytosis, and macropinocytosis (reviewed in reference 40). The two primary routes of virus entry are clathrin-mediated endocytosis, where viruses encounter an acidic environment, and caveolae-mediated endocytosis, which is pH neutral. Many nonenveloped viruses, including adenovirus (24, 52), parvovirus (6), and reovirus (34, 49), require acidic pH during entry. However, numerous nonenveloped viruses have acid-independent entry mechanisms, including rotavirus (28), polyomavirus (43), simian virus 40 (41, 51), and several members of the picornavirus family (7, 14, 32, 42).Upon reaching the appropriate site of membrane penetration, nonenveloped virus capsid proteins are triggered by cellular factors, such as receptor binding and/or exposure to low pH within endosomes, to undergo conformational changes necessary for membrane interactions. These tightly regulated structural rearrangements may include capsid disassembly, exposure of hydrophobic regions, and/or release of membrane-lytic factors. For example, low pH within endosomes triggers adenovirus capsid disassembly, leading to the release of the membrane lytic protein VI (24, 60). In contrast, poliovirus is activated for membrane penetration by a pH-independent mechanism. Receptor binding triggers the poliovirus capsid to undergo a conformational change, resulting in the exposure of the N terminus of VP1 and the release of VP4 (18, 23), both of which facilitate membrane interactions (20). Notably, even though some viruses, such as reovirus, enter cells via an acidic endocytic pathway, membrane penetration is not acid activated (16), indicating that exposure to low pH and membrane penetration are not always mutual events.The overall simplicity of the FHV capsid, composed of a single gene product, along with the wealth of available high-resolution structural information (reviewed in reference 45) make FHV an ideal candidate for understanding nonenveloped virus entry and infection. FHV, a member of the family Nodaviridae, is a nonenveloped insect virus with a bipartite RNA genome surrounded by an icosahedral protein capsid. The quasi-equivalent T=3 virion (∼300-Å diameter) is initially composed of 180 copies of a single coat precursor protein α (44 kDa). Following capsid assembly the α protein undergoes autocatalytic cleavage to generate two particle-associated cleavage products, a large N-terminal fragment, β (39 kDa), and a small C-terminal fragment, γ (4.4 kDa) (22), creating the infectious virion (46). Mutant FHV particles that do not undergo autocatalytic cleavage, and therefore cannot release the γ peptide, are not infectious (46). It has been hypothesized that these particles are noninfectious because they cannot mediate membrane penetration, but this has never been shown directly.The FHV X-ray structure revealed that the γ peptides were located inside the capsid shell with residues 364 to 385 forming amphipathic helices (19). Subsequent studies showed that the FHV capsid is dynamic, with γ transiently exposed to the exterior of the capsid (11). These findings led to a structure-based model of FHV membrane disruption in which the dynamic γ peptides are reversibly exposed to the surface of the capsid (11), “sampling” the environment until they encounter the appropriate cellular trigger. The virus is then activated to undergo an irreversible conformational change in which the γ helical bundles located at each fivefold axis are externalized and released from the virus particle (17, 19). Upon release, the γ pentameric helical bundles are predicted to insert into and create a local disruption of the membrane bilayer to allow the RNA to enter the cytoplasm (10).While biochemical and structural studies have provided the foundation for a model of FHV cell entry, more rigorous in vivo and in vitro studies are necessary to confirm the ideas put forth in this model. Here, we clarify the route of FHV entry and characterize the tightly regulated events required for FHV membrane penetration. We demonstrate for the first time that low endocytic pH is required for FHV infection, that acidic pH promotes FHV membrane penetration, and that particles exposed to low pH exhibit increased hydrophobicity. In addition, we provide evidence that mutant, cleavage-defective particles are blocked specifically at the membrane penetration step during cell entry. Taken together, these findings offer an experimentally supported model of FHV entry into host cells. In addition, these results add to the accumulating evidence that nonenveloped viruses employ common mechanisms to traverse cellular membranes.     

Divergent Evolution of Norovirus GII/4 by Genome Recombination from May 2006 to February 2009 in Japan

Norovirus GII/4 is a leading cause of acute viral gastroenteritis in humans. We examined here how the GII/4 virus evolves to generate and sustain new epidemics in humans, using 199 near-full-length GII/4 genome sequences and 11 genome segment clones from human stool specimens collected at 19 sites in Japan between May 2006 and February 2009. Phylogenetic studies demonstrated outbreaks of 7 monophyletic GII/4 subtypes, among which a single subtype, termed 2006b, had continually predominated. Phylogenetic-tree, bootscanning-plot, and informative-site analyses revealed that 4 of the 7 GII/4 subtypes were mosaics of recently prevalent GII/4 subtypes and 1 was made up of the GII/4 and GII/12 genotypes. Notably, single putative recombination breakpoints with the highest statistical significance were constantly located around the border of open reading frame 1 (ORF1) and ORF2 (P ≤ 0.000001), suggesting outgrowth of specific recombinant viruses in the outbreaks. The GII/4 subtypes had many unique amino acids at the time of their outbreaks, especially in the N-term, 3A-like, and capsid proteins. Unique amino acids in the capsids were preferentially positioned on the outer surface loops of the protruding P2 domain and more abundant in the dominant subtypes. These findings suggest that intersubtype genome recombination at the ORF1/2 boundary region is a common mechanism that realizes independent and concurrent changes on the virion surface and in viral replication proteins for the persistence of norovirus GII/4 in human populations.Norovirus (NoV) is a nonenveloped RNA virus that belongs to the family Caliciviridae and can cause acute gastroenteritis in humans. The NoV genome is a single-stranded, positive-sense, polyadenylated RNA that encodes three open reading frames, ORF1, ORF2, and ORF3 (68). ORF1 encodes a long polypeptide (∼200 kDa) that is cleaved in the cells by the viral proteinase (3C^pro) into six proteins (4). These proteins function in NoV replication in host cells (19). ORF2 encodes a viral capsid protein, VP1. The capsid gene evolved at a rate of 4.3 × 10⁻³ nucleotide substitutions/site/year (7), which is comparable to the substitution rates of the envelope and capsid genes of human immunodeficiency virus (30). The capsid protein of NoV consists of a shell (S) and two protruding (P) domains: P1 and P2 (47). The S domain is relatively conserved within the same genetic lineages of NoVs (38) and is responsible for the assembly of VP1 (6). The P1 subdomain is also relatively conserved (38) and has a role in enhancing the stability of virus particles (6). The P2 domain is positioned at the most exposed surface of the virus particle (47) and forms binding clefts for putative infection receptors, such as human histo-blood group antigens (HBGA) (8, 13, 14, 60). The P2 domain also contains epitopes for neutralizing antibodies (27, 33) and is consistently highly variable even within the same genetic lineage of NoVs (38). ORF3 encodes a VP2 protein that is suggested to be a minor structural component of virus particles (18) and to be responsible for the expression and stabilization of VP1 (5).Thus far, the NoVs found in nature are classified into five genogroups (GI to GV) and multiple genotypes on the basis of the phylogeny of capsid sequences (71). Among them, genogroup II genotype 4 (GII/4), which was present in humans in the mid-1970s (7), is now the leading cause of NoV-associated acute gastroenteritis in humans (54). The GII/4 is further subclassifiable into phylogenetically distinct subtypes (32, 38, 53). Notably, the emergence and spread of a new GII/4 subtype with multiple amino acid substitutions on the capsid surface are often associated with greater magnitudes of NoV epidemics (53, 54). In 2006 and 2007, a GII/4 subtype, termed 2006b, prevailed globally over preexisting GII/4 subtypes in association with increased numbers of nonbacterial acute gastroenteritis cases in many countries, including Japan (32, 38, 53). The 2006b subtype has multiple unique amino acid substitutions that occur most preferentially in the protruding subdomain of the capsid, the P2 subdomain (32, 38, 53). Together with information on human population immunity against NoV GII/4 subtypes (12, 32), it has been postulated that the accumulation of P2 mutations gives rise to antigenic drift and plays a key role in new epidemics of NoV GII/4 in humans (32, 38, 53).Genetic recombination is common in RNA viruses (67). In NoV, recombination was first suggested by the phylogenetic analysis of an NoV genome segment clone: a discordant branching order was noted with the trees of the 3D^pol and capsid coding regions (21). Subsequently, many studies have reported the phylogenetic discordance using sequences from various epidemic sites in different study periods (1, 10, 11, 16, 17, 22, 25, 40, 41, 44-46, 49, 51, 57, 63, 64, 66). These results suggest that genome recombination frequently occurs among distinct lineages of NoV variants in vivo. However, the studies were done primarily with direct sequencing data of the short genome portion, and information on the cloned genome segment or full-length genome sequences is very limited (21, 25). Therefore, we lack an overview of the structural and temporal dynamics of viral genomes during NoV epidemics, and it remains unclear whether NoV mosaicism plays a role in these events.To clarify these issues, we collected 199 near-full-length genome sequences of GII/4 from NoV outbreaks over three recent years in Japan, divided them into monophyletic subtypes, analyzed the temporal and geographical distribution of the subtypes, collected phylogenetic evidence for the viral genome mosaicism of the subtypes, identified putative recombination breakpoints in the genomes, and isolated mosaic genome segments from the stool specimens. We also performed computer-assisted sequence and structural analyses with the identified subtypes to address the relationship between the numbers of P2 domain mutations at the times of the outbreaks and the magnitudes of the epidemics. The obtained data suggest that intersubtype genome recombination at the ORF1/2 boundary region is common in the new GII/4 outbreaks and promotes the effective acquisition of mutation sets of heterogeneous capsid surface and viral replication proteins.     

Lack of Bax Prevents Influenza A Virus-Induced Apoptosis and Causes Diminished Viral Replication

The ectopic overexpression of Bcl-2 restricts both influenza A virus-induced apoptosis and influenza A virus replication in MDCK cells, thus suggesting a role for Bcl-2 family members during infection. Here we report that influenza A virus cannot establish an apoptotic response without functional Bax, a downstream target of Bcl-2, and that both Bax and Bak are directly involved in influenza A virus replication and virus-induced cell death. Bak is substantially downregulated during influenza A virus infection in MDCK cells, and the knockout of Bak in mouse embryonic fibroblasts yields a dramatic rise in the rate of apoptotic death and a corresponding increase in levels of virus replication, suggesting that Bak suppresses both apoptosis and the replication of virus and that the virus suppresses Bak. Bax, however, is activated and translocates from the cytosol to the mitochondria; this activation is required for the efficient induction of apoptosis and virus replication. The knockout of Bax in mouse embryonic fibroblasts blocks the induction of apoptosis, restricts the infection-mediated activation of executioner caspases, and inhibits virus propagation. Bax knockout cells still die but by an alternative death pathway displaying characteristics of autophagy, similarly to our previous observation that influenza A virus infection in the presence of a pancaspase inhibitor leads to an increase in levels of autophagy. The knockout of Bax causes a retention of influenza A virus NP within the nucleus. We conclude that the cell and virus struggle to control apoptosis and autophagy, as appropriately timed apoptosis is important for the replication of influenza A virus.The pathology of influenza A virus infection usually arises from acute lymphopenia and inflammation of the lungs and airway columnar epithelial cells (23, 38). Influenza A virus induces apoptotic death in infected epithelial, lymphocyte, and phagocytic cells, and apoptosis is a source of tissue damage during infection (3, 22, 33) and increased susceptibility to bacterial pathogens postinfection (31). While the induction of apoptosis by influenza A virus has been well documented (4, 19-21, 28, 33, 37), the mechanisms of this interaction are not well understood. Two viral proteins, NS1 and PB1-F2, have been associated with viral killing of cells. NS1, originally characterized as being proapoptotic (34), was later identified as being an interferon antagonist, inhibiting the activation of several key antiviral responses and restricting the apoptotic response to infection (1, 10, 15, 18, 35, 39, 46). In contrast, PB1-F2 induces apoptosis primarily by localizing to the outer mitochondrial membrane, promoting cytochrome c release, and triggering the apoptotic cascade (43). This effect, however, is typically restricted to infected monocytes, leading to the hypothesis that PB1-F2 induces apoptosis specifically to clear the landscape of immune responders (5, 44). Although PB1-F2 activity does not directly manipulate virus replication or virus-induced apoptosis, PB1-F2 localization to the mitochondrial membrane during infection potentiates the apoptotic response in epithelial and fibroblastic cells through tBID signaling with proapoptotic Bcl-2 family protein members Bax and Bak (22, 43, 44).The Bcl-2 protein family consists of both pro- and antiapoptotic members that regulate cytochrome c release during mitochondrion-mediated apoptosis through the formation of pore-like channels in the outer mitochondrial membrane (12, 16). During the initiation of mitochondrion-mediated apoptosis, cytoplasmic Bid is cleaved to form tBID. This, in turn, activates proapoptotic Bax and Bak (40), which drive cytochrome c release and subsequent caspase activation. Bak is constitutively associated with the mitochondrial membrane, whereas inactive Bax is primarily cytosolic, translocating to the outer mitochondrial membrane only after activation (6). The activation of Bax and Bak results in homo- and heterodimer formation at the outer mitochondrial membrane, generating pores that facilitate mitochondrial membrane permeabilization and cytochrome c release (14, 17), leading to caspase activation and the apoptotic cascade (8). Antiapoptotic members of the Bcl-2 protein family, including Bcl-2, inhibit the activation of proapoptotic Bax and Bak primarily by sequestering inactive Bax and Bak monomers via interactions between their BH3 homology domains (7).Bcl-2 expression has been linked to decreased viral replication rates (26). Bcl-2 overexpression inhibits influenza A virus-induced cell death and reduces the titer and spread of newly formed virions (29). The activation of caspase-3 in the absence of sufficient Bcl-2 is critical to the influenza A virus life cycle. Both Bcl-2 expression and the lack of caspase activation during infection lead to the nuclear accumulation of influenza virus ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes, thereby leading to the improper assembly of progeny virions and a marked reduction in titers of infectious virus (26, 41, 42, 45).Here we show that influenza A virus induces mitochondrion-mediated (intrinsic-pathway) apoptosis signaled specifically through Bax and that this Bax signaling is essential for the maximum efficiency of virus propagation. In contrast, Bak expression is strongly downregulated during infection. Cells lacking Bak (while expressing Bax) display a much more severe apoptotic phenotype in response to infection and produce infectious virions at a higher rate than the wild type (WT), suggesting that Bak, which can suppress viral replication, is potentially downregulated by the virus. Our results indicate essential and opposing roles for Bax and Bak in both the response of cells to influenza A virus infection and the ability of the virus to maximize its own replicative potential.