Andes Virus Recognition of Human and Syrian Hamster β3 Integrins Is Determined by an L33P Substitution in the PSI Domain

Andes virus (ANDV) causes a fatal hantavirus pulmonary syndrome (HPS) in humans and Syrian hamsters. Human α_vβ₃ integrins are receptors for several pathogenic hantaviruses, and the function of α_vβ₃ integrins on endothelial cells suggests a role for α_vβ₃ in hantavirus directed vascular permeability. We determined here that ANDV infection of human endothelial cells or Syrian hamster-derived BHK-21 cells was selectively inhibited by the high-affinity α_vβ₃ integrin ligand vitronectin and by antibodies to α_vβ₃ integrins. Further, antibodies to the β₃ integrin PSI domain, as well as PSI domain polypeptides derived from human and Syrian hamster β₃ subunits, but not murine or bovine β₃, inhibited ANDV infection of both BHK-21 and human endothelial cells. These findings suggest that ANDV interacts with β₃ subunits through PSI domain residues conserved in both Syrian hamster and human β₃ integrins. Sequencing the Syrian hamster β₃ integrin PSI domain revealed eight differences between Syrian hamster and human β₃ integrins. Analysis of residues within the PSI domains of human, Syrian hamster, murine, and bovine β₃ integrins identified unique proline substitutions at residues 32 and 33 of murine and bovine PSI domains that could determine ANDV recognition. Mutagenizing the human β₃ PSI domain to contain the L33P substitution present in bovine β₃ integrin abolished the ability of the PSI domain to inhibit ANDV infectivity. Conversely, mutagenizing either the bovine PSI domain, P33L, or the murine PSI domain, S32P, to the residue present human β₃ permitted PSI mutants to inhibit ANDV infection. Similarly, CHO cells transfected with the full-length bovine β₃ integrin containing the P33L mutation permitted infection by ANDV. These findings indicate that human and Syrian hamster α_vβ₃ integrins are key receptors for ANDV and that specific residues within the β₃ integrin PSI domain are required for ANDV infection. Since L33P is a naturally occurring human β₃ polymorphism, these findings further suggest the importance of specific β₃ integrin residues in hantavirus infection. These findings rationalize determining the role of β₃ integrins in hantavirus pathogenesis in the Syrian hamster model.Hantaviruses persistently infect specific small mammal hosts and are spread to humans by the inhalation of aerosolized excreted virus (41, 42). Hantaviruses predominantly infect endothelial cells and cause one of two vascular leak-based diseases: hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS) and hantavirus pulmonary syndrome (HPS) (41). Hantavirus diseases are characterized by increased vascular permeability and acute thrombocytopenia in the absence of endothelial cell lysis (36, 41, 42, 54). In general, hantaviruses are not spread from person to person; however, the Andes hantavirus (ANDV) is an exception, since there are several reports of person-to-person transmission of ANDV infection (11, 37, 47, 52). ANDV is also unique in its ability to cause an HPS-like disease in Syrian hamsters and serves as the best-characterized hantavirus disease model with a long onset, symptoms, and pathogenesis nearly identical to that of HPS patients (20, 21, 50).Hantavirus infection of the endothelium alters endothelial cell barrier functions through direct and immunological responses (8, 14). Although the means by which hantaviruses cause pulmonary edema or hemorrhagic disease has been widely conjectured, the mechanisms by which hantaviruses elicit pathogenic human responses have yet to be defined. Hantaviruses coat the surface of infected VeroE6 cells days after infection (17), and this further suggests that dynamic hantavirus interactions with immune and endothelial cells are likely to contribute to viral pathogenesis. Hantavirus pathogenesis has been suggested to involve CD8⁺ T cells, tumor necrosis factor alpha or other cytokines, viremia, and the dysregulation of β₃ integrins (7, 8, 13-16, 25-28, 32, 34, 38, 44-46). However, these responses have not been demonstrated to contribute to hantavirus pathogenesis, and in some cases there are conflicting data on their involvement (18, 25-28, 34, 35, 44, 45, 48). Immune complex deposition clearly contributes to HFRS patient disease and renal sequelae (4, 7), but it is unclear what triggers vascular permeability in HPS and HFRS diseases or why hemorrhage occurs in HFRS patients but not in HPS patients (8, 36, 54). Acute thrombocytopenia is common to both diseases, and platelet dysfunction resulting from defective platelet aggregation is reported in HFRS patients (7, 8).Pathogenic hantaviruses have in common their ability to interact with α_IIbβ₃ and α_vβ₃ integrins present on platelets and endothelial cells (13, 16), and β₃ integrins have primary roles in regulating vascular integrity (1, 2, 6, 19, 22, 39, 40). Consistent with the presence of cell surface displayed virus (17), pathogenic hantaviruses uniquely block α_vβ₃ directed endothelial cell migration and enhance endothelial cell permeability for 3 to 5 days postinfection (14, 15). Pathogenic hantaviruses dysregulate β₃ integrin functions by binding domains present at the apex of inactive β₃ integrin conformers (38). α_vβ₃ forms a complex with vascular endothelial cell growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) and normally regulates VEGF-directed endothelial cell permeability (2, 3, 10, 39, 40). However, both β₃ integrin knockouts and hantavirus-infected endothelial cells result in increased VEGF-induced permeability, presumably by disrupting VEGFR2-β₃ integrin complex formation (2, 14, 19, 39, 40). This suggests that at least one means for hantaviruses to increase vascular permeability occurs through interactions with β₃ integrins that are required for normal platelet and endothelial cell functions.α_vβ₃ and α_IIbβ₃ integrins exist in two conformations: an active extended conformation where the ligand binding head domain is present at the apex of the heterodimer and a basal, inactive bent conformation where the globular head of the integrin is folded toward the cell membrane (30, 53, 55). Pathogenic HTN and NY-1 hantaviruses bind to the N-terminal plexin-semaphorin-integrin (PSI) domain of β₃ integrin subunits and are selective for bent, inactive α_vβ₃ integrin conformers (38). Pathogenic hantavirus binding to inactive α_vβ₃ integrins is consistent with the selective inhibitory effect of hantaviruses on α_vβ₃ function and endothelial cell permeability (14, 15, 38). Although the mechanism of hantavirus induced vascular permeability has yet to be defined, there is a clear role for β₃ integrin dysfunction in vascular permeability deficits (5, 6, 22, 29, 39, 40, 51) which make an understanding of hantavirus interactions with β₃ subunits important for both entry and disease processes.The similarity between HPS disease in humans and Syrian hamsters (20, 21) suggests that pathogenic mechanisms of ANDV disease are likely to be coincident. Curiously, other hantaviruses (Sin Nombre virus [SNV] and Hantaan virus [HTNV]) are restricted in Syrian hamsters and fail to cause disease in this animal, even though they are prominent causes of human disease (50). Although the host range restriction for SNV and HTNV in Syrian hamsters has not been defined (33), the pathogenesis of ANDV in Syrian hamsters suggests that both human and Syrian hamster β₃ integrins may similarly be used by ANDV and contribute to pathogenesis.We demonstrate here that ANDV infection of the Syrian hamster BHK-21 cell line and human endothelial cells is dependent on α_vβ₃ and inhibited by α_vβ₃ specific ligands and antibodies. Further, polypeptides expressing the N-terminal 53 residues of human and Syrian hamster β₃ subunits block ANDV infection. This further indicates that ANDV interaction with the N-terminal 53 residues of both human and Syrian hamster β₃ integrins is required for viral entry. We also demonstrate that ANDV recognition of human and Syrian hamster β₃ integrins is determined by proline substitutions at residues 32/33 within the β₃ integrin PSI domain. These results define unique ANDV interactions with human and Syrian hamster β₃ integrins.     

Isolation of Human Monoclonal Antibodies That Potently Neutralize Human Cytomegalovirus Infection by Targeting Different Epitopes on the gH/gL/UL128-131A Complex

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is a widely circulating pathogen that causes severe disease in immunocompromised patients and infected fetuses. By immortalizing memory B cells from HCMV-immune donors, we isolated a panel of human monoclonal antibodies that neutralized at extremely low concentrations (90% inhibitory concentration [IC₉₀] values ranging from 5 to 200 pM) HCMV infection of endothelial, epithelial, and myeloid cells. With the single exception of an antibody that bound to a conserved epitope in the UL128 gene product, all other antibodies bound to conformational epitopes that required expression of two or more proteins of the gH/gL/UL128-131A complex. Antibodies against gB, gH, or gM/gN were also isolated and, albeit less potent, were able to neutralize infection of both endothelial-epithelial cells and fibroblasts. This study describes unusually potent neutralizing antibodies against HCMV that might be used for passive immunotherapy and identifies, through the use of such antibodies, novel antigenic targets in HCMV for the design of immunogens capable of eliciting previously unknown neutralizing antibody responses.Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is a member of the herpesvirus family which is widely distributed in the human population and can cause severe disease in immunocompromised patients and upon infection of the fetus. HCMV infection causes clinical disease in 75% of patients in the first year after transplantation (58), while primary maternal infection is a major cause of congenital birth defects including hearing loss and mental retardation (5, 33, 45). Because of the danger posed by this virus, development of an effective vaccine is considered of highest priority (51).HCMV infection requires initial interaction with the cell surface through binding to heparan sulfate proteoglycans (8) and possibly other surface receptors (12, 23, 64, 65). The virus displays a broad host cell range (24, 53), being able to infect several cell types such as endothelial cells, epithelial cells (including retinal cells), smooth muscle cells, fibroblasts, leukocytes, and dendritic cells (21, 37, 44, 54). Endothelial cell tropism has been regarded as a potential virulence factor that might influence the clinical course of infection (16, 55), whereas infection of leukocytes has been considered a mechanism of viral spread (17, 43, 44). Extensive propagation of HCMV laboratory strains in fibroblasts results in deletions or mutations of genes in the UL131A-128 locus (1, 18, 21, 36, 62, 63), which are associated with the loss of the ability to infect endothelial cells, epithelial cells, and leukocytes (15, 43, 55, 61). Consistent with this notion, mouse monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) to UL128 or UL130 block infection of epithelial and endothelial cells but not of fibroblasts (63). Recently, it has been shown that UL128, UL130, and UL131A assemble with gH and gL to form a five-protein complex (thereafter designated gH/gL/UL128-131A) that is an alternative to the previously described gCIII complex made of gH, gL, and gO (22, 28, 48, 63).In immunocompetent individuals T-cell and antibody responses efficiently control HCMV infection and reduce pathological consequences of maternal-fetal transmission (13, 67), although this is usually not sufficient to eradicate the virus. Albeit with controversial results, HCMV immunoglobulins (Igs) have been administered to transplant patients in association with immunosuppressive treatments for prophylaxis of HCMV disease (56, 57), and a recent report suggests that they may be effective in controlling congenital infection and preventing disease in newborns (32). These products are plasma derivatives with relatively low potency in vitro (46) and have to be administered by intravenous infusion at very high doses in order to deliver sufficient amounts of neutralizing antibodies (4, 9, 32, 56, 57, 66).The whole spectrum of antigens targeted by HCMV-neutralizing antibodies remains poorly characterized. Using specific immunoabsorption to recombinant antigens and neutralization assays using fibroblasts as model target cells, it was estimated that 40 to 70% of the serum neutralizing activity is directed against gB (6). Other studies described human neutralizing antibodies specific for gB, gH, or gM/gN viral glycoproteins (6, 14, 26, 29, 34, 41, 52, 60). Remarkably, we have recently shown that human sera exhibit a more-than-100-fold-higher potency in neutralizing infection of endothelial cells than infection of fibroblasts (20). Similarly, CMV hyperimmunoglobulins have on average 48-fold-higher neutralizing activities against epithelial cell entry than against fibroblast entry (10). However, epitopes that are targeted by the antibodies that comprise epithelial or endothelial cell-specific neutralizing activity of human immune sera remain unknown.In this study we report the isolation of a large panel of human monoclonal antibodies with extraordinarily high potency in neutralizing HCMV infection of endothelial and epithelial cells and myeloid cells. With the exception of a single antibody that recognized a conserved epitope of UL128, all other antibodies recognized conformational epitopes that required expression of two or more proteins of the gH/gL/UL128-131A complex.     

A Single-Amino-Acid Substitution in Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Envelope Glycoprotein B at a Site Required for Binding to the Paired Immunoglobulin-Like Type 2 Receptor α (PILRα) Abrogates PILRα-Dependent Viral Entry and Reduces Pathogenesis

Paired immunoglobulin-like type 2 receptor α (PILRα) is a herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) entry receptor that associates with O-glycans on HSV-1 envelope glycoprotein B (gB). Two threonine residues (Thr-53 and Thr-480) in gB, which are required for the addition of the principal gB O-glycans, are essential for binding to soluble PILRα. However, the role of the two threonines in PILRα-dependent viral entry remains to be elucidated. Therefore, we constructed a recombinant HSV-1 carrying an alanine replacement of gB Thr-53 alone (gB-T53A) or of both gB Thr-53 and Thr-480 (gB-T53/480A) and demonstrated that these mutations abrogated viral entry in CHO cells expressing PILRα. In contrast, the mutations had no effect on viral entry in CHO cells expressing known host cell receptors for HSV-1 gD, viral entry in HL60 cells expressing myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG) (another HSV-1 gB receptor), viral attachment to heparan sulfate, and viral replication in PILRα-negative cells. These results support the hypothesis that gB Thr-53 and Thr-480 as well as gB O-glycosylation, probably at these sites, are critical for PILRα-dependent viral entry. Interestingly, following corneal inoculation in mice, the gB-T53A and gB-T53/480A mutations significantly reduced viral replication in the cornea, the development of herpes stroma keratitis, and neuroinvasiveness. The abilities of HSV-1 to enter cells in a PILRα-dependent manner and to acquire specific carbohydrates on gB are therefore linked to an increase in viral replication and virulence in the experimental murine model.Herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) entry into host cells depends on interactions between cell surface receptors and HSV-1 virion envelope glycoproteins (39). Five of the 12 HSV-1 envelope glycoproteins that have been identified thus far (i.e., glycoprotein B [gB], gC, gD, gH, and gL) have roles in viral entry (39). Both gB and gC mediate virion attachment by interacting with cell surface glycosaminoglycan, primarily heparan sulfate (16, 17). Although not essential for entry, this step provides stable interactions between the virion and the cell that favor the next steps (39). These steps include gD binding to one of its identified receptors, i.e., herpesvirus entry mediator (HVEM), nectin-1, and specific sites on heparan sulfate 3-O-sulfated heparan sulfate (3-O-S-HS) generated by certain 3-O-sulfotransferases (3-O-STs) (14, 28, 38, 51). Subsequent fusion between the virion envelope and host cell membrane, which requires the cooperative function of gB, heterodimer gH/gL, gD, and a gD receptor, then produces nucleocapsid penetration into the cell (31, 46).In addition to the interaction of gD with a gD receptor, gB binding to a cellular receptor other than heparan sulfate has been suggested to mediate viral entry, based on the observation that a soluble form of gB binds to heparan sulfate-deficient cells and blocks HSV-1 infection of some cell lines (3). Consistent with this observation, we have reported that paired immunoglobulin-like type 2 receptor α (PILRα) associates with gB and functions as an HSV-1 entry receptor (36). Viral entry via PILRα appears to be conserved among alphaherpesviruses, but there is a PILRα preference based on the observation that PILRα is able to mediate the entry of pseudorabies virus, a porcine alphaherpesvirus, but not of HSV-2 (1). Importantly, HSV-1 infection of human primary monocytes expressing both HVEM and PILRα was blocked by either an anti-PILRα or anti-HVEM antibody, suggesting that cellular receptors for both gD and gB are required for HSV-1 infection (36). However, CHO-K1 cells, which are resistant to HSV-1 infection, can become susceptible to HSV-1 entry and HSV-1-induced cell fusion after the overexpression of either a gD receptor, such as nectin-1, or PILRα (14, 36). It was thought that CHO-K1 cells express endogenously low levels of gB and gD receptors that allow the single overexpression of either a gB or gD receptor to support detectable levels of HSV-1 entry and HSV-1-induced cell fusion (36). More recently, myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG), which has homology to PILRα, was also reported to serve as the gB receptor for HSV-1 and varicella-zoster virus (40). However, the importance of PILRα- or MAG-dependent viral entry in HSV-1 infection and pathogenesis in vivo remains to be elucidated.PILRα is one of the paired receptor families, in which one receptor has inhibitory functions and the other mediates activation functions, and is expressed mainly in immune system cells (13, 29). In addition, PILRα was previously reported to be expressed in certain types of cells in neural tissues (36). We previously identified one of the PILRα ligands as CD99 (37). Interestingly, PILRα recognition of CD99 is dependent on the addition of sialylated O-linked sugar chains at particular CD99 threonines (50). Similarly, we recently demonstrated that a specific sialylated O-glycan(s) on gB is critical for PILRα binding, based on observations that neuraminidase, which removes sialic acid, and benzyl-α-GalNAc treatment, which blocks O-glycan synthesis, inhibited gB binding to a soluble PILRα (49). More importantly, one (Thr-53) or both (Thr-53 and Thr-480) putative O-glycosylation sites identified by bioinformatics analysis are required for the binding of gB to soluble PILRα, and the replacement of both Thr-53 and Thr-480 with alanine significantly inhibited the addition of O-glycans to gB (49). These observations suggest that Thr-53 and Thr-480 in gB are O-glycosylated, and these sites, and probably the addition of specific carbohydrates to them, are required for the interaction of gB with PILRα. However, it remains uncertain whether gB Thr-53 and Thr-480, and probably the gB O-glycosylation of these sites, are required for PILRα-dependent viral entry in natural infections.In the present study, we have shown that the alanine replacement of gB Thr-53 (gB-T53A) alone or of both gB Thr-53 and Thr-480 (gB-T53/480A) significantly inhibited cell-cell fusion in CHO cells expressing PILRα, gB, gD, gH, and gL, whereas the mutations had no effect on cell-cell fusion in CHO cells expressing nectin-1, gB, gD, gH, and gL. Furthermore, we constructed recombinant HSV-1 carrying the gB-T53A and gB-T53/480A mutations and found that these mutations abrogated PILRα-dependent viral entry but had no effect on viral entry via known receptors for HSV-1 gD and MAG, viral attachment to heparan sulfate, and viral replication in PILRα-negative cells. We also tested these recombinant viruses in mice and present data showing that the mutations in gB significantly reduced viral replication, the development of herpes stromal keratitis (HSK), and neuroinvasiveness.     

The Amino Terminus of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Glycoprotein K (gK) Modulates gB-Mediated Virus-Induced Cell Fusion and Virion Egress

Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1)-induced cell fusion is mediated by viral glycoproteins and other membrane proteins expressed on infected cell surfaces. Certain mutations in the carboxyl terminus of HSV-1 glycoprotein B (gB) and in the amino terminus of gK cause extensive virus-induced cell fusion. Although gB is known to be a fusogenic glycoprotein, the mechanism by which gK is involved in virus-induced cell fusion remains elusive. To delineate the amino-terminal domains of gK involved in virus-induced cell fusion, the recombinant viruses gKΔ31-47, gKΔ31-68, and gKΔ31-117, expressing gK carrying in-frame deletions spanning the amino terminus of gK immediately after the gK signal sequence (amino acids [aa] 1 to 30), were constructed. Mutant viruses gKΔ31-47 and gKΔ31-117 exhibited a gK-null (ΔgK) phenotype characterized by the formation of very small viral plaques and up to a 2-log reduction in the production of infectious virus in comparison to that for the parental HSV-1(F) wild-type virus. The gKΔ31-68 mutant virus formed substantially larger plaques and produced 1-log-higher titers than the gKΔ31-47 and gKΔ31-117 mutant virions at low multiplicities of infection. Deletion of 28 aa from the carboxyl terminus of gB (gBΔ28syn) caused extensive virus-induced cell fusion. However, the gBΔ28syn mutation was unable to cause virus-induced cell fusion in the presence of the gKΔ31-68 mutation. Transient expression of a peptide composed of the amino-terminal 82 aa of gK (gKa) produced a glycosylated peptide that was efficiently expressed on cell surfaces only after infection with the HSV-1(F), gKΔ31-68, ΔgK, or UL20-null virus. The gKa peptide complemented the gKΔ31-47 and gKΔ31-68 mutant viruses for infectious-virus production and for gKΔ31-68/gBΔ28syn-mediated cell fusion. These data show that the amino terminus of gK modulates gB-mediated virus-induced cell fusion and virion egress.Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) specifies at least 11 virally encoded glycoproteins, as well as several nonglycosylated and lipid-anchored membrane-associated proteins, which serve important functions in virion infectivity and virus spread. Although cell-free enveloped virions can efficiently spread viral infection, virions can also spread by causing cell fusion of adjacent cellular membranes. Virus-induced cell fusion, which is caused by viral glycoproteins expressed on infected cell surfaces, enables transmission of virions from one cell to another, avoiding extracellular spaces and exposure of free virions to neutralizing antibodies (reviewed in reference 56). Most mutations that cause extensive virus-induced cell-to-cell fusion (syncytial or syn mutations) have been mapped to at least four regions of the viral genome: the UL20 gene (5, 42, 44); the UL24 gene (37, 58); the UL27 gene, encoding glycoprotein B (gB) (9, 51); and the UL53 gene, coding for gK (7, 15, 35, 53, 54, 57).Increasing evidence suggests that virus-induced cell fusion is mediated by the concerted action of glycoproteins gD, gB, and gH/gL. Recent studies have shown that gD interacts with both gB and gH/gL (1, 2). Binding of gD to its cognate receptors, including Nectin-1, HVEM, and others (12, 29, 48, 59, 60, 62, 63), is thought to trigger conformation changes in gH/gL and gB that cause fusion of the viral envelope with cellular membranes during virus entry and virus-induced cell fusion (32, 34). Transient coexpression of gB, gD, and gH/gL causes cell-to-cell fusion (49, 68). However, this phenomenon does not accurately model viral fusion, because other viral glycoproteins and membrane proteins known to be important for virus-induced cell fusion are not required (6, 14, 31). Specifically, gK and UL20 were shown to be absolutely required for virus-induced cell fusion (21, 46). Moreover, syncytial mutations within gK (7, 15, 35, 53, 54, 57) or UL20 (5, 42, 44) promote extensive virus-induced cell fusion, and viruses lacking gK enter more slowly than wild-type virus into susceptible cells (25). Furthermore, transient coexpression of gK carrying a syncytial mutation with gB, gD, and gH/gL did not enhance cell fusion, while coexpression of the wild-type gK with gB, gD, and gH/gL inhibited cell fusion (3).Glycoproteins gB and gH are highly conserved across all subfamilies of herpesviruses. gB forms a homotrimeric type I integral membrane protein, which is N glycosylated at multiple sites within the polypeptide. An unusual feature of gB is that syncytial mutations that enhance virus-induced cell fusion are located exclusively in the carboxyl terminus of gB, which is predicted to be located intracellularly (51). Single-amino-acid substitutions within two regions of the intracellular cytoplasmic domain of gB were shown to cause syncytium formation and were designated region I (amino acid [aa] positions 816 and 817) and region II (aa positions 853, 854, and 857) (9, 10, 28, 69). Furthermore, deletion of 28 aa from the carboxyl terminus of gB, disrupting the small predicted alpha-helical domain H17b, causes extensive virus-induced cell fusion as well as extensive glycoprotein-mediated cell fusion in the gB, gD, and gH/gL transient-coexpression system (22, 49, 68). The X-ray structure of the ectodomain of gB has been determined and is predicted to assume at least two major conformations, one of which may be necessary for the fusogenic properties of gB. Therefore, perturbation of the carboxyl terminus of gB may alter the conformation of the amino terminus of gB, thus favoring one of the two predicted conformational structures that causes membrane fusion (34).The UL53 (gK) and UL20 genes encode multipass transmembrane proteins of 338 and 222 aa, respectively, which are conserved in all alphaherpesviruses (15, 42, 55). Both proteins have multiple sites where posttranslational modification can occur; however, only gK is posttranslationally modified by N-linked carbohydrate addition (15, 35, 55). The specific membrane topologies of both gK and UL20 protein (UL20p) have been predicted and experimentally confirmed using epitope tags inserted within predicted intracellular and extracellular domains (18, 21, 44). Syncytial mutations in gK map predominantly within extracellular domains of gK and particularly within the amino-terminal portion of gK (domain I) (18), while syncytial mutations of UL20 are located within the amino terminus of UL20p, shown to be located intracellularly (44). A series of recent studies have shown that HSV-1 gK and UL20 functionally and physically interact and that these interactions are necessary for their coordinate intracellular transport and cell surface expression (16, 18, 21, 26, 45). Specifically, direct protein-protein interactions between the amino terminus of HSV-1 UL20 and gK domain III, both of which are localized intracellularly, were recently demonstrated by two-way coimmunoprecipitation experiments (19).According to the most prevalent model for herpesvirus intracellular morphogenesis, capsids initially assemble within the nuclei and acquire a primary envelope by budding into the perinuclear spaces. Subsequently, these virions lose their envelope through fusion with the outer nuclear lamellae. Within the cytoplasm, tegument proteins associate with the viral nucleocapsid and final envelopment occurs by budding of cytoplasmic capsids into specific trans-Golgi network (TGN)-associated membranes (8, 30, 47, 70). Mature virions traffic to cell surfaces, presumably following the cellular secretory pathway (33, 47, 61). In addition to their significant roles in virus-induced cell fusion, gK and UL20 are required for cytoplasmic virion envelopment. Viruses with deletions in either the gK or the UL20 gene are unable to translocate from the cytoplasm to extracellular spaces and accumulated as unenveloped virions in the cytoplasm (5, 15, 20, 21, 26, 35, 36, 38, 44, 55). Current evidence suggests that the functions of gK and UL20 in cytoplasmic virion envelopment and virus-induced cell fusion are carried out by different, genetically separable domains of UL20p. Specifically, UL20 mutations within the amino and carboxyl termini of UL20p allowed cotransport of gK and UL20p to cell surfaces, virus-induced cell fusion, and TGN localization, while effectively inhibiting cytoplasmic virion envelopment (44, 45).In this paper, we demonstrate that the amino terminus of gK expressed as a free peptide of 82 aa (gKa) is transported to infected cell surfaces by viral proteins other than gK or UL20p and facilitates virus-induced cell fusion caused by syncytial mutations in the carboxyl terminus of gB. Thus, functional domains of gK can be genetically separated, as we have shown previously (44, 45), as well as physically separated into different peptide portions that retain functional activities of gK. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that the amino terminus of gK directly or indirectly interacts with and modulates the fusogenic properties of gB.     

Differential Effects on Cell Fusion Activity of Mutations in Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Glycoprotein B (gB) Dependent on Whether a gD Receptor or a gB Receptor Is Overexpressed

Glycoprotein B (gB) of herpes simplex virus (HSV) is one of four glycoproteins essential for viral entry and cell fusion. Recently, paired immunoglobulin-like type 2 receptor (PILRα) was identified as a receptor for HSV type 1 (HSV-1) gB. Both PILRα and a gD receptor were shown to participate in HSV-1 entry into certain cell types. The purpose of this study was to determine whether insertional mutations in gB had differential effects on its function with PILRα and the gD receptor, nectin-1. Previously described gB mutants and additional newly characterized mutants were used in this study. We found that insertional mutations near the N terminus and C terminus of gB and especially in the central region of the ectodomain reduced cell fusion activity when PILRα was overexpressed much more than when nectin-1 was overexpressed. Most of the insertions reduced the binding of gB to PILRα, for at least some forms of gB, but this reduction did not necessarily correlate with the selective reduction in cell fusion activity with PILRα. These results suggest that the regions targeted by the relevant mutations are critical for functional activity with PILRα. They also suggest that, although both the binding of gB to a gB receptor and the binding of gD to a gD receptor may be required for HSV-induced cell fusion, the two receptor-binding activities may have unequal weights in triggering fusogenic activity, depending on the ratios of gB and gD receptors or other factors.Manifestations of disease caused by herpes simplex virus (HSV) include recurrent mucocutaneous lesions in the mouth or on the face or genitalia and, more rarely, meningitis or encephalitis. The infection of host cells occurs by the fusion of the virion envelope with a cell membrane to deliver the nucleocapsid containing the viral genome into the host cell. This entry process and virus-induced cell fusion require glycoprotein B (gB), along with gD, gH, and gL. The membrane-fusing activity of HSV depends in part on the binding of gD to one of its receptors, herpesvirus entry mediator (HVEM), nectin-1, nectin-2, or 3-O-sulfated heparan sulfate (18). HVEM is a member of the tumor necrosis factor receptor family and is expressed by cells of the immune system, as well as many other cell types, such as epithelial, stromal, and endothelial cells (23). Nectin-1 and nectin-2 are cell adhesion molecules belonging to the immunoglobulin superfamily and are widely expressed by a variety of cell types, including epithelial cells and neurons (20). Specific sites in heparan sulfate generated by particular 3-O-sulfotransferases can serve as gD-binding entry receptors (17). This binding of gD to a receptor is associated with conformational changes in gD that are thought to enable gD to interact with gB and/or the heterodimer gH-gL to trigger fusogenic activity (8, 12). Both gB and gH have properties of fusogenic viral proteins (1, 7). Although evidence has been presented that gD and gH-gL are sufficient for hemifusion and that gB, in addition, is required for fusion pore formation (19), the specific roles each plays in HSV-induced membrane fusion have not been fully defined.gB was recently discovered to bind to paired immunoglobulin-like type 2 receptor (PILRα) in an interaction that can mediate viral entry and cell fusion, provided that gD also binds to one of its receptors (14). For cells such as CD14⁺ monocytes, antibodies specific for either HVEM or PILRα were shown to block HSV entry. Also, entry requires the presence of both gD and gB in the virion. Although the overexpression of either a gD receptor or a gB receptor can enhance the susceptibility of cells to HSV entry and HSV-induced cell fusion, there are very few, if any, cell types that do not express at least low levels of endogenous receptors. Thus, the possibility exists that these endogenous receptors are cooperating with the introduced receptors to render the cells susceptible to HSV-induced membrane fusion.PILRα belongs to the paired-receptor families, which consist of activating and inhibitory receptors (4, 11, 19). They are conserved among mammals (24). The inhibitory form PILRα has an immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibition motif in its cytoplasmic domain and transduces inhibitory signals (4). On the other hand, the activating form PILRβ associates with the immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif-bearing DAP12 adaptor molecule and delivers activating signals (16). Both PILRα and PILRβ are expressed on cells of the immune system, especially monocytes, dendritic cells, and NK cells (4, 11, 19), and also in neurons (14). CD99 has been identified as a natural ligand for both PILRα and PILRβ (16). The binding of either PILRα or PILRβ to CD99 depends on the presence of sialyated O-linked glycans on CD99 (22).In addition to binding to PILRα, gB can bind to heparin and heparan sulfate and may contribute, along with gC, to the binding of HSV to cell surface heparan sulfate (17). Also, gB and gC can bind to DC-SIGN, which serves as a binding receptor for the infection of dendritic cells (2). An X-ray structure of the HSV-1 gB ectodomain reveals a homotrimeric conformation with structural homology to vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) G glycoprotein, the single glycoprotein responsible for the entry of VSV. Both HSV-1 gB and VSV G glycoprotein have features of class 1 and class 2 viral fusion proteins and have been designated class 3 fusion proteins (7, 14, 15). The heparan sulfate-binding determinant of gB has been localized to a lysine-rich domain in the N terminus and shown to be dispensable for viral entry (9). It lies within a region that is probably disordered and was not included in the defined coordinates of the X-ray structure. The binding of DC-SIGN to gB probably depends on high-mannose N-glycans of gB (6).In a previous study (10), 81 insertion mutants of HSV-1 gB were characterized to assess the effects of the insertions on protein processing and function in cell fusion with gD receptors, in relation to structural domains of gB identified in an X-ray structure (7). Only 27 mutants were found to be processed into mature glycosylated forms and transported to the cell surface. Only 11 of these retained fusion activity toward target cells expressing nectin-1 or HVEM. For the present study, we used 25 previously described gB insertion mutants shown to be expressed on cell surfaces and also identified an additional 10 such mutants.The present study was designed to determine whether the effects of insertions in gB on cell fusion activity would be dependent on whether a gD receptor (nectin-1) or a gB receptor (PILRα) was overexpressed in target cells that also expressed unidentified weak endogenous receptors. In addition, we assessed the abilities of the gB mutants to bind to PILRα. Our results showed that some insertions inhibited cell fusion activity when PILRα was overexpressed significantly more than when nectin-1 was overexpressed, but without necessarily preventing the binding of PILRα to gB, at least to some stable oligomeric forms of gB. The results indicate that, although both a gB receptor and a gD receptor may be required for cell fusion activity, the two receptor-binding activities have unequal weights in triggering fusogenic activity, depending on the ratios of gB and gD receptors or other factors.     

Trafficking of UL37 Proteins into Mitochondrion-Associated Membranes during Permissive Human Cytomegalovirus Infection

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) UL37 proteins traffic sequentially from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to the mitochondria. In transiently transfected cells, UL37 proteins traffic into the mitochondrion-associated membranes (MAM), the site of contact between the ER and mitochondria. In HCMV-infected cells, the predominant UL37 exon 1 protein, pUL37x1, trafficked into the ER, the MAM, and the mitochondria. Surprisingly, a component of the MAM calcium signaling junction complex, cytosolic Grp75, was increasingly enriched in heavy MAM from HCMV-infected cells. These studies show the first documented case of a herpesvirus protein, HCMV pUL37x1, trafficking into the MAM during permissive infection and HCMV-induced alteration of the MAM protein composition.The human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) UL37 immediate early (IE) locus expresses multiple products, including the predominant UL37 exon 1 protein, pUL37x1, also known as viral mitochondrion-localized inhibitor of apoptosis (vMIA), during lytic infection (16, 22, 24, 39, 44). The UL37 glycoprotein (gpUL37) shares UL37x1 sequences and is internally cleaved, generating pUL37_NH2 and gpUL37_COOH (2, 22, 25, 26). pUL37x1 is essential for the growth of HCMV in humans (17) and for the growth of primary HCMV strains (20) and strain AD169 (14, 35, 39, 49) but not strain TownevarATCC in permissive human fibroblasts (HFFs) (27).pUL37x1 induces calcium (Ca²⁺) efflux from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) (39), regulates viral early gene expression (5, 10), disrupts F-actin (34, 39), recruits and inactivates Bax at the mitochondrial outer membrane (MOM) (4, 31-33), and inhibits mitochondrial serine protease at late times of infection (28).Intriguingly, HCMV UL37 proteins localize dually in the ER and in the mitochondria (2, 9, 16, 17, 24-26). In contrast to other characterized, similarly localized proteins (3, 6, 11, 23, 30, 38), dual-trafficking UL37 proteins are noncompetitive and sequential, as an uncleaved gpUL37 mutant protein is ER translocated, N-glycosylated, and then imported into the mitochondria (24, 26).Ninety-nine percent of ∼1,000 mitochondrial proteins are synthesized in the cytosol and directly imported into the mitochondria (13). However, the mitochondrial import of ER-synthesized proteins is poorly understood. One potential pathway is the use of the mitochondrion-associated membrane (MAM) as a transfer waypoint. The MAM is a specialized ER subdomain enriched in lipid-synthetic enzymes, lipid-associated proteins, such as sigma-1 receptor, and chaperones (18, 45). The MAM, the site of contact between the ER and the mitochondria, permits the translocation of membrane-bound lipids, including ceramide, between the two organelles (40). The MAM also provides enriched Ca²⁺ microdomains for mitochondrial signaling (15, 36, 37, 43, 48). One macromolecular MAM complex involved in efficient ER-to-mitochondrion Ca²⁺ transfer is comprised of ER-bound inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate receptor 3 (IP3R3), cytosolic Grp75, and a MOM-localized voltage-dependent anion channel (VDAC) (42). Another MAM-stabilizing protein complex utilizes mitofusin 2 (Mfn2) to tether ER and mitochondrial organelles together (12).HCMV UL37 proteins traffic into the MAM of transiently transfected HFFs and HeLa cells, directed by their NH₂-terminal leaders (8, 47). To determine whether the MAM is targeted by UL37 proteins during infection, we fractionated HCMV-infected cells and examined pUL37x1 trafficking in microsomes, mitochondria, and the MAM throughout all temporal phases of infection. Because MAM domains physically bridge two organelles, multiple markers were employed to verify the purity and identity of the fractions (7, 8, 19, 46, 47).(These studies were performed in part by Chad Williamson in partial fulfillment of his doctoral studies in the Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics Program at George Washington Institute of Biomedical Sciences.)HFFs and life-extended (LE)-HFFs were grown and not infected or infected with HCMV (strain AD169) at a multiplicity of 3 PFU/cell as previously described (8, 26, 47). Heavy (6,300 × g) and light (100,000 × g) MAM fractions, mitochondria, and microsomes were isolated at various times of infection and quantified as described previously (7, 8, 47). Ten- or 20-μg amounts of total lysate or of subcellular fractions were resolved by SDS-PAGE in 4 to 12% Bis-Tris NuPage gels (Invitrogen) and examined by Western analyses (7, 8, 26). Twenty-microgram amounts of the fractions were not treated or treated with proteinase K (3 μg) for 20 min on ice, resolved by SDS-PAGE, and probed by Western analysis. The blots were probed with rabbit anti-UL37x1 antiserum (DC35), goat anti-dolichyl phosphate mannose synthase 1 (DPM1), goat anti-COX2 (both from Santa Cruz Biotechnology), mouse anti-Grp75 (StressGen Biotechnologies), and the corresponding horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (8, 47). Reactive proteins were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) reagents (Pierce), and images were digitized as described previously (26, 47).     

A Human Cytomegalovirus gO-Null Mutant Fails To Incorporate gH/gL into the Virion Envelope and Is Unable To Enter Fibroblasts and Epithelial and Endothelial Cells

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) depends upon a five-protein complex, gH/gL/UL128-131, to enter epithelial and endothelial cells. A separate HCMV gH/gL-containing complex, gH/gL/gO, has been described. Our prevailing model is that gH/gL/UL128-131 is required for entry into biologically important epithelial and endothelial cells and that gH/gL/gO is required for infection of fibroblasts. Genes encoding UL128-131 are rapidly mutated during laboratory propagation of HCMV on fibroblasts, apparently related to selective pressure for the fibroblast entry pathway. Arguing against this model in the accompanying paper by B. J. Ryckman et al. (J. Virol., 84:2597-2609, 2010), we describe evidence that clinical HCMV strain TR expresses a gO molecule that acts to promote endoplasmic reticulum (ER) export of gH/gL and that gO is not stably incorporated into the virus envelope. This was different from results involving fibroblast-adapted HCMV strain AD169, which incorporates gO into the virion envelope. Here, we constructed a TR gO-null mutant, TRΔgO, that replicated to low titers, spread poorly among fibroblasts, but produced normal quantities of extracellular virus particles. TRΔgO particles released from fibroblasts failed to infect fibroblasts and epithelial and endothelial cells, but the chemical fusogen polyethylene glycol (PEG) could partially overcome defects in infection. Therefore, TRΔgO is defective for entry into all three cell types. Defects in entry were explained by observations showing that TRΔgO incorporated about 5% of the quantities of gH/gL in extracellular virus particles compared with that in wild-type virions. Although TRΔgO particles could not enter cells, cell-to-cell spread involving epithelial and endothelial cells was increased relative to TR, apparently resulting from increased quantities of gH/gL/UL128-131 in virions. Together, our data suggest that TR gO acts as a chaperone to promote ER export and the incorporation of gH/gL complexes into the HCMV envelope. Moreover, these data suggest that it is gH/gL, and not gH/gL/gO, that is present in virions and is required for infection of fibroblasts and epithelial and endothelial cells. Our observations that both gH/gL and gH/gL/UL128-131 are required for entry into epithelial/endothelial cells differ from models for other beta- and gammaherpesviruses that use one of two different gH/gL complexes to enter different cells.Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infects a broad spectrum of cell types in vivo, including epithelial and endothelial cells, fibroblasts, monocyte-macrophages, dendritic cells, hepatocytes, neurons, glial cells, and leukocytes (6, 28, 36). Infection of this diverse spectrum of cell types contributes to the multiplicity of CMV-associated disease. HCMV infection of hepatocytes and epithelial cells in the gut and lungs following transplant immunosuppression is directly associated with CMV disease (3, 44). HCMV can be transported in the blood by monocyte-macrophages, and virus produced in these cells can infect endothelial cells, leading to virus spread into solid tissues such as the brain, liver, and lungs, etc. (16). Despite the broad spectrum of cells infected in vivo, propagation of HCMV in the laboratory is largely limited to normal human fibroblasts because other cells produce little virus. HCMV rapidly adapts to laboratory propagation in fibroblasts, losing the capacity to infect other cell types, i.e., epithelial and endothelial cells and monocyte-macrophages (9, 16, 18, 43). This adaptation to fibroblasts involves mutations in the unique long b′ (ULb′) region of the HCMV genome, which includes 22 genes (9). Targeted mutation of three of the ULb′ genes, UL128, UL130, and UL131, abolished HCMV infection of endothelial cells, transmission to leukocytes, and infection of dendritic cells (17, 18). Restoration of UL128-131 genes in HCMV laboratory strain AD169 (which cannot infect epithelial and endothelial cells) produced viruses capable of infecting these cells (18, 48). There is also evidence that the UL128-131 proteins are deleterious to HCMV replication in fibroblasts, resulting in rapid loss or mutation of one or more of the UL128-131 genes during passage in fibroblasts (2).A major step forward in understanding how the UL128-131 genes promote HCMV infection of epithelial and endothelial cells involved observations that the UL128-131 proteins assemble onto the extracellular domain of the membrane-anchored HCMV glycoprotein heterodimer gH/gL (1, 49). Antibodies to UL128, UL130, and UL131 each neutralized HCMV for infection of endothelial or epithelial cells (1, 49). All herpesviruses express gH/gL homologues and, where this has been tested, all depend upon gH/gL for replication and, more specifically, for entry into cells (14, 15, 31, 38). Indeed, we showed that the gH/gL/UL128-131 complex mediated entry into epithelial and endothelial cells (40). All five members of the gH/gL/UL128-131 complex were required for proper assembly and export from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and for function (39, 41). In addition, the expression of gH/gL/UL128-131, but not gH/gL or gB, in epithelial cells interfered with HCMV entry into these cells (39). This interference suggested that there are saturable gH/gL/UL128-131 receptors present on epithelial cells, molecules that HCMV uses for entry. There was no interference in fibroblasts expressing gH/gL/UL128-131, although some interference was observed with gH/gL (39). As noted above, gH/gL/UL128-131 plays no obvious role in entry into fibroblasts and, in fact, appears to be deleterious in this respect (2, 18, 40).HCMV also expresses a second gH/gL complex, as follows: gH/gL/gO (20, 21, 22, 30, 48). Fibroblast-adapted HCMV strain AD169 expresses a gO protein that is a 110- to 125-kDa glycoprotein (21). Pulse-chase studies suggest that gH/gL assembles first in the ER before binding and forming disulfide links with gO (21, 22). The 220-kDa immature gH/gL/gO complex is transported from the ER to the Golgi apparatus and increases in size to ∼280 to 300 kDa before incorporation into the virion envelope (21). gH/gL/gO complexes are apparently distinct from gH/gL/UL128-131 complexes because gO-specific antibodies do not detect complexes containing either UL128 or UL130 and UL128-specific antibodies do not precipitate gO (49). Towne and AD169 gO-null mutant laboratory strains can produce small plaques on fibroblasts, leading to the conclusion that gO is not essential. However, the AD169 and Towne mutants produced ∼1,000-fold less infectious virus than wild-type HCMV (14, 19), which might also be interpreted to mean that gO is very important or even essential for replication. Thus, the prevailing model has been that wild-type HCMV particles contain the following two gH/gL complexes: gH/gL/gO, which promotes infection of fibroblasts, and gH/gL/UL128-131, which promotes entry into epithelial and endothelial cells. Supporting this model, there are two different entry mechanisms, as follows: HCMV enters fibroblasts by fusion at the plasma membrane at neutral pH (12), whereas entry into epithelial and endothelial cells involves endocytosis and a low pH-dependent fusion with endosomes (40). This model of HCMV entry parallels models for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) entry that use gH/gL to enter epithelial cells and gH/gL/gp42 to enter B cells (24). Similarly, HHV-6 uses gH/gL/gO and gH/gL/gQ, which bind to different receptors (33).Many of the studies of gH/gL/gO have involved the fibroblast-adapted HCMV strain AD169, which fails to express UL131 and assemble gH/gL/UL128-131 or AD169 recombinants in which UL131 expression was restored (20, 21, 22, 48, 49). It seemed possible that the adaptation of AD169 to long-term passage in fibroblasts might also involve alterations in gO. HCMV gO is unusually variable (15 to 25% amino acid differences) among different HCMV strains compared with other viral genes (13, 34, 35, 37, 46). In recent studies, Jiang et al. (26) described a gO-null mutant derived from the HCMV strain TB40/E, a strain that can infect endothelial cells following extensive passage on these cells. The TB40/E gO-null mutant spread poorly on fibroblasts compared with wild-type TB40/E, and there was little infectious virus detected in fibroblast culture supernatants. However, the few TB40/E gO-null mutant particles produced by fibroblasts that could initiate infection of endothelial cells were able to spread to form normal-sized plaques on endothelial cells. These results further supported the model for which gH/gL/gO is required for infection of fibroblasts but not for epithelial/endothelial cells. Those authors also concluded that gO is important for the assembly of enveloped particles in fibroblasts, based on observations of few infectious virus particles in supernatants and cytoplasmic accumulation of unenveloped capsids (26).Our studies of gH/gL/UL128-131 have involved the clinical HCMV strain TR (39, 40, 41, 47). HCMV TR was originally an ocular isolate from an AIDS patient (45) and was passaged only a few times on fibroblasts before being genetically frozen in the form of a bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) (34, 40). HCMV TR infects epithelial and endothelial cells (40) and monocyte-macrophages (D. Streblow and J. Nelson, unpublished results) well. In the accompanying paper (42), we characterized the biochemistry and intracellular trafficking of TR gO. TR gO expressed either in TR-infected cells or by using adenovirus vectors (expressed without other HCMV proteins) was largely retained in the ER. Coexpression of gO with gH/gL promoted transport of gH/gL beyond the ER. Importantly, TR gO was not found in extracellular virions. In contrast, AD169 gO was present in extracellular virus particles, as described previously (20, 21). We concluded that TR gO is a chaperone that promotes ER export of the gH/gL complex, but gO dissociates prior to incorporation into the virus envelope. Moreover, these differences highlight major differences between gO molecules expressed by fibroblast-adapted strain AD169 and low-passage TR.To extend these results and characterize how TR gO functions, whether in virus entry or virus assembly/egress, we constructed a TR gO-null mutant. TRΔgO exhibited major defects in entering fibroblasts, as evidenced by increased virus infection following treatment with the chemical fusogen polyethylene glycol (PEG). Unexpectedly, the mutant also failed to enter epithelial and endothelial cells, and again, PEG partially restored entry. Relatively normal numbers of TRΔgO particles were produced and released into cell culture supernatants, although even with PEG treatment, most of these virus particles remained defective in initiating immediate-early HCMV protein synthesis. Western blot analyses of TRΔgO extracellular particles demonstrated very low levels of gH/gL incorporated into virions, which likely explains the reduced entry of TRΔgO. However, the small amounts of gH/gL complexes that were present in TRΔgO virions were associated with increased quantities of UL130, and these TRΔgO particles spread better than wild-type HCMV on epithelial cell monolayers. Together with the results shown in the accompanying paper (42), we concluded that HCMV TR gO functions as a chaperone to promote ER export of gH/gL to HCMV assembly compartments and the incorporation of gH/gL into the virion envelope. The highly reduced quantities of gH/gL in virions are apparently responsible for the inability of HCMV to enter fibroblasts and epithelial and endothelial cells. These results suggest a modified version of our model, in which gH/gL, not gH/gL/gO, mediates entry into fibroblasts and both gH/gL and gH/gL/UL128-131 are required for entry into epithelial and endothelial cells.     

Lipid Phosphate Phosphatase 3 Stabilization of β-Catenin Induces Endothelial Cell Migration and Formation of Branching Point Structures

Endothelial cell (EC) migration, cell-cell adhesion, and the formation of branching point structures are considered hallmarks of angiogenesis; however, the underlying mechanisms of these processes are not well understood. Lipid phosphate phosphatase 3 (LPP3) is a recently described p120-catenin-associated integrin ligand localized in adherens junctions (AJs) of ECs. Here, we tested the hypothesis that LPP3 stimulates β-catenin/lymphoid enhancer binding factor 1 (β-catenin/LEF-1) to induce EC migration and formation of branching point structures. In subconfluent ECs, LPP3 induced expression of fibronectin via β-catenin/LEF-1 signaling in a phosphatase and tensin homologue (PTEN)-dependent manner. In confluent ECs, depletion of p120-catenin restored LPP3-mediated β-catenin/LEF-1 signaling. Depletion of LPP3 resulted in destabilization of β-catenin, which in turn reduced fibronectin synthesis and deposition, which resulted in inhibition of EC migration. Accordingly, reexpression of β-catenin but not p120-catenin in LPP3-depleted ECs restored de novo synthesis of fibronectin, which mediated EC migration and formation of branching point structures. In confluent ECs, however, a fraction of p120-catenin associated and colocalized with LPP3 at the plasma membrane, via the C-terminal cytoplasmic domain, thereby limiting the ability of LPP3 to stimulate β-catenin/LEF-1 signaling. Thus, our study identified a key role for LPP3 in orchestrating PTEN-mediated β-catenin/LEF-1 signaling in EC migration, cell-cell adhesion, and formation of branching point structures.Angiogenesis, the formation of new blood vessels, involves several well-coordinated cellular processes, including endothelial cell (EC) migration, synthesis and deposition of extracellular matrix proteins, such as fibronectin, cell-cell adhesion, and formation of branching point structures (1-3, 19, 33); however, less is known about the underlying mechanisms of these processes (6, 8, 12, 14, 16, 17). For example, adherens junctions (AJs), which mediate cell-cell adhesion between ECs, may be involved in limiting the extent of cell migration (2, 14, 38, 40). VE-cadherin, a protein found in AJs, is a single-pass transmembrane polypeptide responsible for calcium-dependent homophilic interactions through its extracellular domains (2, 38, 40). The VE-cadherin cytoplasmic domain interacts with the Armadillo domain-containing proteins, β-catenin, γ-catenin (plakoglobin), and p120-catenin (p120ctn) (2, 15, 38, 40, 43). Genetic and biochemical evidence documents a crucial role of β-catenin in regulating cell adhesion as well as proliferation secondary to the central position of β-catenin in the Wnt signaling pathway (13, 16, 25, 31, 44). In addition, the juxtamembrane protein p120ctn regulates AJ stability via binding to VE-cadherin (2, 7, 9, 15, 21, 28, 32, 43). The absence of regulation or inappropriate regulation of β-catenin and VE-cadherin functions is linked to cardiovascular disease and tumor progression (2, 6).We previously identified lipid phosphate phosphatase 3 (LPP3), also known as phosphatidic acid phosphatase 2b (PAP2b), in a functional assay of angiogenesis (18, 19, 41, 42). LPP3 not only exhibits lipid phosphatase activity but also functions as a cell-associated integrin ligand (18, 19, 35, 41, 42). The known LPPs (LPP1, LPP2, and LPP3) (20-23) are six transmembrane domain-containing plasma membrane-bound enzymes that dephosphorylate sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) and its structural homologues, and thus, these phosphatases generate lipid mediators (4, 5, 23, 35, 39). All LPPs, which contain a single N-glycosylation site and a putative lipid phosphatase motif, are situated such that their N and C termini are within the cell (4, 5, 22, 23, 35, 39). Only the LPP3 isoform contains an Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) sequence in the second extracellular loop, and this RGD sequence enables LPP3 to bind integrins (18, 19, 22). Transfection experiments with green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged LPP1 and LPP3 showed that LPP1 is apically sorted, whereas LPP3 colocalized with E-cadherin at cell-cell contact sites with other Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells (22). Mutagenesis and domain swapping experiments established that LPP1 contains an apical targeting signal sequence (FDKTRL) in its N-terminal segment. In contrast, LPP3 contains a dityrosine (109Y/110Y) basolateral sorting motif (22). Interestingly, conventional deletion of Lpp3 is embryonic lethal, since the Lpp3 gene plays a critical role in extraembryonic vasculogenesis independent of its lipid phosphatase activity (11). In addition, an LPP3-neutralizing antibody was shown to prevent cell-cell interactions (19, 42) and angiogenesis (42). Here, we addressed the hypothesis that LPP3 plays a key role in EC migration, cell-cell adhesion, and formation of branching point structures by stimulating β-catenin/lymphoid enhancer binding factor 1 (β-catenin/LEF-1) signaling.     

Serine Dephosphorylation of Receptor Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase α in Mitosis Induces Src Binding and Activation

Receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase α (RPTPα) is the mitotic activator of the protein tyrosine kinase Src. RPTPα serine hyperphosphorylation was proposed to mediate mitotic activation of Src. We raised phosphospecific antibodies to the two main serine phosphorylation sites, and we discovered that RPTPα Ser204 was almost completely dephosphorylated in mitotic NIH 3T3 and HeLa cells, whereas Ser180 and Tyr789 phosphorylation were only marginally reduced in mitosis. Concomitantly, Src pTyr527 and pTyr416 were dephosphorylated, resulting in 2.3-fold activation of Src in mitosis. Using inhibitors and knockdown experiments, we demonstrated that dephosphorylation of RPTPα pSer204 in mitosis was mediated by PP2A. Mutation of Ser204 to Ala did not activate RPTPα, and intrinsic catalytic activity of RPTPα was not affected in mitosis. Interestingly, binding of endogenous Src to RPTPα was induced in mitosis. GRB2 binding to RPTPα, which was proposed to compete with Src binding to RPTPα, was only modestly reduced in mitosis, which could not account for enhanced Src binding. Moreover, we demonstrate that Src bound to mutant RPTPα-Y789F, lacking the GRB2 binding site, and mutant Src with an impaired Src homology 2 (SH2) domain bound to RPTPα, illustrating that Src binding to RPTPα is not mediated by a pTyr-SH2 interaction. Mutation of RPTPα Ser204 to Asp, mimicking phosphorylation, reduced coimmunoprecipitation with Src, suggesting that phosphorylation of Ser204 prohibits binding to Src. Based on our results, we propose a new model for mitotic activation of Src in which PP2A-mediated dephosphorylation of RPTPα pSer204 facilitates Src binding, leading to RPTPα-mediated dephosphorylation of Src pTyr527 and pTyr416 and hence modest activation of Src.Protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs) are responsible for dephosphorylation of the phosphotyrosyl residues. The human genome contains approximately 100 genes that encode members of the four PTP families, and most of them have mouse orthologues (2, 48). According to their subcellular localization, the classical PTPs, encoded by less than half of the total PTP genes, are divided into two subfamilies: cytoplasmic and receptor protein tyrosine phosphatases (RPTPs). The majority of the RPTPs contain, besides a variable extracellular domain and a transmembrane domain, two highly homologous phosphatase domains (27), with the membrane-proximal domain comprising most of the catalytic activity (33).RPTPα is a typical RPTP with a small, highly glycosylated extracellular domain (13). RPTPα function is regulated by many mechanisms, including proteolysis (18), oxidation (55), dimerization (7, 23, 24, 47, 52), and phosphorylation of serine and tyrosine residues (16, 17, 49). RPTPα is broadly expressed in many cell types, and over the years, RPTPα has been shown to be involved in a number of signaling mechanisms, including neuronal (15) and skeletal muscle (34) cell differentiation, neurite elongation (8, 9, 56), insulin receptor signaling downregulation (3, 28, 30, 31, 35), insulin secretion (25), activation of voltage-gated potassium channel Kv1.2 (51), long-term potentiation in hippocampal neurons (32, 38), matrix-dependent force transduction (53), and cell spreading and migration (21, 45, 57).The majority of the roles played in these cellular processes involve RPTPα''s ability to activate the proto-oncogenes Src and Fyn by dephosphorylating their C-terminal inhibitory phosphotyrosine (5, 15, 39, 45, 61). Normally, this phosphotyrosine (pTyr527 in chicken Src) binds to the Src homology 2 (SH2) domain, keeping the protein in an inactive closed conformation. A displacement mechanism was proposed for RPTPα-mediated Src activation in which pTyr789 of RPTPα is required to bind the SH2 domain of Src before RPTPα dephosphorylates Tyr527 (58). This model is the subject of debate since other studies show that RPTPα lacking Tyr789 is still able to dephosphorylate and activate Src (12, 26, 29, 56). In normal cells, Src reaches its activation peak during mitosis (4, 11, 40, 42), and with the help of overexpressing cells, it was shown that this activation is triggered mainly by RPTPα. The model that emerged is that RPTPα is activated in mitosis due to serine hyperphosphorylation and detaches from the GRB2 scaffolding protein (59, 60) that normally binds most of the pTyr789 of RPTPα via its SH2 domain (14, 17, 46). Two serine phosphorylation sites were mapped in the juxtamembrane domain of RPTPα, Ser180 and Ser204 (49). The kinases that were found responsible for their phosphorylation were protein kinase C delta (PKCdelta) (10) and CaMKIIalpha (9), but there is no clear evidence that these kinases are activated in mitosis. We set out to investigate the role of serine phosphorylation of RPTPα in mitotic activation of Src.We generated phosphospecific antibodies and show that RPTPα pSer204, but not pSer180, is dephosphorylated in mitotic NIH 3T3 and HeLa cells, concomitantly with activation of Src. Selective inhibitors suggested that PP2A was the phosphatase that dephosphorylated pSer204. RNA interference (RNAi)-mediated knockdown of the catalytic subunit of PP2A demonstrated that indeed PP2A was responsible for mitotic dephosphorylation of RPTPα pSer204. It is noteworthy that PP2A is known to be activated in mitosis. Intrinsic PTP activities of RPTPα were similar in unsynchronized and mitotic cells, and mutation of Ser204 did not activate RPTPα in in vitro PTP assays. Yet, Src binding to RPTPα was induced in mitotic NIH 3T3 cells and RPTPα-S204D with a phosphomimicking mutation at Ser204 coimmunoprecipitated less efficiently with Src. Based on our results, we propose a mechanism for mitotic activation of Src that is triggered by dephosphorylation of RPTPα pSer204, resulting in enhanced affinity for Src and subsequent dephosphorylation and activation of Src.     

The Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 UL20 Protein and the Amino Terminus of Glycoprotein K (gK) Physically Interact with gB

Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) glycoprotein K (gK) and the UL20 protein (UL20p) are strictly required for virus-induced cell fusion, and mutations within either the gK or UL20 gene cause extensive cell fusion (syncytium formation). We have shown that gK forms a functional protein complex with UL20p, which is required for all gK and UL20p-associated functions in the HSV-1 life cycle. Recently, we showed that the amino-terminal 82 amino acids (aa) of gK (gKa) were required for the expression of the syncytial phenotype of the mutant virus gBΔ28 lacking the carboxyl-terminal 28 amino acids of gB (V. N. Chouljenko, A. V. Iyer, S. Chowdhury, D. V. Chouljenko, and K. G. Kousoulas, J. Virol. 83:12301-12313, 2009). This work suggested that the amino terminus of gK may directly or indirectly interact with gB and/or other viral glycoproteins. Two-way coimmunoprecipitation experiments revealed that UL20p interacted with gB in infected cells. Furthermore, the gKa peptide was coimmunoprecipitated with gB but not gD. Three recombinant baculoviruses were constructed, expressing the amino-terminal 82 aa of gKa together with either the extracellular portion of gB (30 to 748 aa), gD (1 to 340 aa), or gH (1 to 792 aa), respectively. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments revealed that gKa physically interacted with the extracellular portions of gB and gH but not gD. Three additional recombinant baculoviruses expressing gKa and truncated gBs encompassing aa 30 to 154, 30 to 364, and 30 to 500 were constructed. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments showed that gKa physically interacted with all three truncated gBs. Computer-assisted prediction of possible gKa binding sites on gB suggested that gKa may interact predominantly with gB domain I (E. E. Heldwein, H. Lou, F. C. Bender, G. H. Cohen, R. J. Eisenberg, and S. C. Harrison, Science 313:217-220, 2006). These results imply that the gK/UL20p protein complex modulates the fusogenic properties of gB and gH via direct physical interactions.Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) can enter into cells via the fusion of its viral envelope with cellular membranes. Also, the virus can spread from infected to uninfected cells by causing virus-induced cell fusion, allowing virions to enter into uninfected cells without being exposed to extracellular spaces. These membrane fusion phenomena are known to be mediated by viral glycoproteins and other viral proteins (reviewed in reference 36). Although wild-type viruses cause a limited amount of virus-induced cell fusion, certain mutations cause extensive virus-induced cell-to-cell fusion (syncytial, or syn, mutations). These syncytial mutations are located predominantly within the UL20 gene (5, 27, 28); the UL24 gene (25, 38); the UL27 gene, encoding glycoprotein gB (7, 15, 18, 32); and the UL53 gene, coding for gK (6, 11, 24, 34, 35, 37).The presence of syncytial mutations within different viral genes, as well as other accumulating evidence, suggests that virus-induced cell fusion is mediated by the concerted action and interactions of the viral glycoproteins gD, gB, and gH/gL as well as gK and the membrane protein UL20p. Specifically, recent studies have shown that gD interacts with both gB and gH/gL (1, 2, 21). However, gB and gH/gL can also interact with each other even in the absence of gD (3). In this membrane fusion model, the binding of gD to its cognate receptors, including nectin-1, herpesvirus entry mediator (HVEM), and other receptors (8, 19, 30, 39-42), is thought to trigger sequential conformational changes in gH/gL and gB causing the fusion of the viral envelope with cellular membranes during virus entry as well as fusion among cellular membranes (22, 23). The transient coexpression of gB, gD, and gH/gL causes cell-to-cell fusion (31, 43), suggesting that these four viral glycoproteins are necessary and sufficient for membrane fusion. However, this transient fusion system does not accurately depict virus-induced cell fusion. Specifically, viral glycoprotein K (gK) and the UL20 membrane protein (UL20p) have been shown to be strictly required for virus-induced cell fusion (10, 27, 29). Moreover, syncytial mutations within gK (6, 11, 24, 34, 35, 37) or UL20 (5, 27, 28) promote extensive virus-induced cell fusion, and viruses lacking gK enter more slowly than the wild-type virus into susceptible cells (17). In contrast, the transient coexpression of gK carrying a syncytial mutation with gB, gD, and gH/gL did not enhance cell fusion, while the coexpression of wild-type gK with gB, gD, and gH/gL was reported previously to inhibit cell fusion in certain cell lines (4). To date, there is no direct evidence that either gK or UL20p interacts with gB, gD, gH, or gL.The X-ray structure of the ectodomain of HSV-1 gB has been determined and was predicted to assume at least two major conformations, one of which may be necessary for the fusogenic properties of gB (23). Single-amino-acid changes within the carboxyl terminus of gB located intracellularly as well as the deletion of the terminal 28 amino acids (aa) of gB cause extensive virus-induced cell fusion, presumably because they alter the extracellular conformation of gB (15, 31, 43). We have previously shown that HSV-1 gK and UL20p functionally and physically interact and that these interactions are absolutely necessary for their coordinate intracellular transport, cell surface expression, and functions in the HSV-1 life cycle (13, 16). In contrast to gB, syncytial mutations in gK map predominantly within extracellular domains of gK and particularly within the amino-terminal portion of gK (domain I) (12), while syncytial mutations of UL20 are located within the amino terminus of UL20p shown to be located intracellularly (27).Recently, we showed that the a peptide composed of the amino-terminal 82 amino acids of gK (gKa) can complement in trans for gB-mediated cell fusion caused by the deletion of the carboxyl-terminal 28 amino acids of gB, suggesting that the gKa peptide interacted with gB or other viral glycoproteins involved in virus-induced cell fusion (10). In this work, we demonstrate that UL20p and the amino terminus of gKa physically interact with gB in infected cells, while the gKa peptide is also capable of binding to the extracellular portion of gH, suggesting that gK/UL20p modulates virus-induced cell fusion via direct interactions with gB and gH.     

Protein Kinase Cδ-Mediated Phosphorylation of Phospholipase D Controls Integrin-Mediated Cell Spreading

Integrin signaling plays critical roles in cell adhesion, spreading, and migration, and it is generally accepted that to regulate these integrin functions accurately, localized actin remodeling is required. However, the molecular mechanisms that control the targeting of actin regulation molecules to the proper sites are unknown. We previously demonstrated that integrin-mediated cell spreading and migration on fibronectin are dependent on the localized activation of phospholipase D (PLD). However, the mechanism underlying PLD activation by integrin is largely unknown. Here we demonstrate that protein kinase Cδ (PKCδ) is required for integrin-mediated PLD signaling. After integrin stimulation, PKCδ is activated and translocated to the edges of lamellipodia, where it colocalizes with PLD2. The abrogation of PKCδ activity inhibited integrin-induced PLD activation and cell spreading. Finally, we show that Thr566 of PLD2 is directly phosphorylated by PKCδ and that PLD2 mutation in this region prevents PLD2 activation, PLD2 translocation to the edge of lamellipodia, Rac translocation, and cell spreading after integrin activation. Together, these results suggest that PKCδ is a primary regulator of integrin-mediated PLD activation via the direct phosphorylation of PLD, which is essential for directing integrin-induced cell spreading.Integrin-mediated cell adhesion, spreading, and migration, which are essential for cellular differentiation, proliferation, survival, chemotaxis, and wound healing, require cell polarization with an environmental stimulus (32). To regulate these integrin-mediated functions accurately, coordinated and spatial control of localized cytoskeletal rearrangement is required. The key downstream signaling molecules of integrin-mediated actin cytoskeletal rearrangements include small GTPases of the Rho family, such as Rho, Cdc42, and Rac (57, 58). Recently it was suggested that integrin indirectly regulates the recruitment of small G proteins and their localized activation at a specific plasma membrane region called the cholesterol-enriched membrane microdomain. Furthermore, the membrane targeting of these molecules appears to be required for the activation of downstream effectors that induce actin reorganization (8, 9, 48). However, in the absence of integrin signaling, despite the GTP loading status, activated Rac and Cdc42 remain in the cytosol and cannot activate downstream effectors, such as p21-activated kinase (PAK) (8). This regulation of the localization of small GTPases to a specific site is supported by the observation that Rac1 is localized and activated at the leading edges of migrating cells, while Cdc42 is also activated in cellular protrusions and in the peripheral region (33, 51). The differentially localized activation of small GTPases results in coordinated spatially confined signaling leading to cytoskeletal rearrangement, which is critical for the regulation of integrin-mediated cell spreading and directional cell migration.The hydrolysis of phosphatidylcholine by phospholipase D1 (PLD1) and PLD2 generates the messenger lipid phosphatidic acid (PA) in response to a variety of signals, which include hormones, neurotransmitters, and growth factors (17). It has been shown that PA affects actin cytoskeletal rearrangement and hence lamellipodium extension and integrin-mediated cell spreading as well as migration. PLD activity has been found in detergent-insoluble membrane fractions in which a wide variety of cytoskeletal proteins, such as F-actin, α-actinin, vinculin, paxillin, and talin, were enriched (34). Furthermore, the stimulation of PLD with physiologic and pharmacologic agonists results in its association with actin filaments (34). In addition, actin polymerization and stress fiber formation are tightly coupled to the activation of PLD (14). The formation of lamellipodium structures and membrane ruffles is blocked by PLD inhibition (53, 60), and PLD activity is critical for epithelial cell, leukocyte, and neutrophil adhesion and migration (41, 43, 52). Furthermore, we have previously shown that the activity of PLD is upregulated, and that the activated PLD is translocated to lamellipodia, after integrin activation (3). The PLD product PA acts as a lipid anchor for the membrane translocation of Rac, and this PA-mediated localized activation of Rac is critical for integrin-mediated cell spreading and migration through Rac downstream signaling activation and actin cytoskeleton rearrangement (3). However, the mechanisms that regulate the activation and localization of PLD, which induce the localized downstream activation of integrin signaling, have not been elucidated.Members of the protein kinase C (PKC) family of serine-threonine kinases are known to play important roles in the transduction of signals from the activation of integrin to cell adhesion and spreading, as well as in cell migration via actin reorganization (11, 25, 61, 66). Several studies have shown that the activities of several PKC isozymes are modulated and are crucially required for integrin-mediated cell spreading and migration. The PKCα, -δ, and -ɛ isotypes were activated and then translocated from the cytosol to the membrane after integrin activation, and inhibition of these PKC isozymes prevented cell spreading (10, 47, 66). In addition, the activation of PKCα, -δ, and -ɛ rescued the spreading of α5 integrin-deficient cells on fibronectin (10), and PKCβΙ mediated platelet cell spreading and migration on fibrinogen (2). It has also been demonstrated that PKCθ activity is involved in endothelial cell migration (65). These results suggest that the kinase activities of diverse members of PKC are involved in the integrin-mediated signaling pathway leading to the actin cytoskeletal rearrangement required for cell spreading and migration. Several PKC substrates are known to influence the actin cytoskeleton directly (42). However, the natures of the isoform-specific functions of PKC members and of their specific downstream effectors for actin cytoskeletal rearrangement induction by integrin signaling remain to be elucidated.In this study, we found that PKCδ is an upstream modulator of localized PLD activation in the integrin signaling pathway. We demonstrate for the first time that PKCδ activity (not PKCα or PKCɛ activity) is critical for integrin-mediated PLD activation, and we found that PLD2 is phosphorylated at Thr566 by PKCδ in the integrin signaling pathway. Furthermore, we show that this phosphorylation is critical for integrin-mediated targeting of PLD to membrane ruffles, Rac translocation to the membrane, and lamellipodium formation during cell spreading. These findings strongly suggest a bridge between PKCδ and the signaling of actin cytoskeletal rearrangement by the integrin signaling pathway via PLD activation, and they provide a novel molecular mechanism for localized PLD activation via PKCδ phosphorylation, which is critical for the actin cytoskeletal rearrangements required for integrin-mediated cell spreading.     

Low pH-Induced Conformational Change in Herpes Simplex Virus Glycoprotein B

Herpesviruses can enter host cells using pH-dependent endocytosis pathways in a cell-specific manner. Envelope glycoprotein B (gB) is conserved among all herpesviruses and is a critical component of the complex that mediates membrane fusion and entry. Here we demonstrate that mildly acidic pH triggers specific conformational changes in herpes simplex virus (HSV) gB. The antigenic structure of gB was specifically altered by exposure to low pH both in vitro and during entry into host cells. The oligomeric conformation of gB was altered at a similar pH range. Exposure to acid pH appeared to convert virion gB into a lower-order oligomer. The detected conformational changes were reversible, similar to those in other class III fusion proteins. Exposure of purified, recombinant gB to mildly acidic pH resulted in similar changes in conformation and caused gB to become more hydrophobic, suggesting that low pH directly affects gB. We propose that intracellular low pH induces alterations in gB conformation that, together with additional triggers such as receptor binding, are essential for virion-cell fusion during herpesviral entry by endocytosis.Herpes simplex virus (HSV) is an important human pathogen, causing significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. HSV enters host cells by fusion of the viral envelope with either an endosomal membrane (38) or the plasma membrane (63). The entry pathway taken is thought to be determined by both virus (17, 45) and host cell (4, 17, 35, 39, 45) factors. Based on experiments with lysosomotropic agents, which elevate the normally low pH of endosomes, acidic pH has been implicated in the endocytic entry of HSV into several cell types, including human epithelial cells (37). Low pH has also recently been implicated in cell infection by several other human and veterinary herpesviruses (1, 21, 26, 47). The mechanistic role of endosomal pH in herpesvirus entry into cells is not known.Herpesviruses are a paradigm for membrane fusion mediated by a complex of several glycoproteins. We have proposed that HSV likely encodes machinery to mediate both pH-dependent and pH-independent membrane fusion reactions. Envelope glycoproteins glycoprotein B (gB) and gD and the heterodimer gH-gL are required for both pH-independent and pH-dependent entry pathways (11, 22, 30, 39, 46). Interaction of gD with one of its cognate receptors is an essential trigger for membrane fusion and entry (13, 52), regardless of the cellular pathway. However, engagement of a gD receptor is not sufficient for fusion, and at least one additional unknown trigger involving gB or gH-gL is likely necessary. gB is conserved among all herpesviruses, and in all cases studied to date, it plays roles in viral entry, including receptor binding and membrane fusion. The crystal structure of an ectodomain fragment of HSV type 1 (HSV-1) gB is an elongated, rod-like structure containing hydrophobic internal fusion loops (28). This structure bears striking architectural homology to the low pH, postfusion form of G glycoprotein from vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV-G) (43). Both the gB and G structures have features of class I and class II fusion proteins and are thus designated class III proteins (57).During entry of the majority of virus families, low pH acts directly on glycoproteins to induce membrane fusion (60). In some cases, the low pH trigger is not sufficient, or it plays an indirect role. For example, host cell proteases, such as cathepsins D and L, require intravesicular low pH to cleave Ebola virus and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) glycoproteins to trigger fusion (14, 51).We investigated the role of low pH in the molecular mechanism of herpesviral entry. The results suggest that mildly acidic pH, similar to that found within endosomes, triggers a conformational change in gB. We propose that, together with other cellular cues such as receptor interaction, intracellular low pH can play a direct activating role in HSV membrane fusion and entry.     

Reevaluating Herpes Simplex Virus Hemifusion

Membrane fusion induced by enveloped viruses proceeds through the actions of viral fusion proteins. Once activated, viral fusion proteins undergo large protein conformational changes to execute membrane fusion. Fusion is thought to proceed through a “hemifusion” intermediate in which the outer membrane leaflets of target and viral membranes mix (lipid mixing) prior to fusion pore formation, enlargement, and completion of fusion. Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) requires four glycoproteins—glycoprotein D (gD), glycoprotein B (gB), and a heterodimer of glycoprotein H and L (gH/gL)—to accomplish fusion. gD is primarily thought of as a receptor-binding protein and gB as a fusion protein. The role of gH/gL in fusion has remained enigmatic. Despite experimental evidence that gH/gL may be a fusion protein capable of inducing hemifusion in the absence of gB, the recently solved crystal structure of HSV-2 gH/gL has no structural homology to any known viral fusion protein. We found that in our hands, all HSV entry proteins—gD, gB, and gH/gL—were required to observe lipid mixing in both cell-cell- and virus-cell-based hemifusion assays. To verify that our hemifusion assay was capable of detecting hemifusion, we used glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-linked hemagglutinin (HA), a variant of the influenza virus fusion protein, HA, known to stall the fusion process before productive fusion pores are formed. Additionally, we found that a mutant carrying an insertion within the short gH cytoplasmic tail, 824L gH, is incapable of executing hemifusion despite normal cell surface expression. Collectively, our findings suggest that HSV gH/gL may not function as a fusion protein and that all HSV entry glycoproteins are required for both hemifusion and fusion. The previously described gH 824L mutation blocks gH/gL function prior to HSV-induced lipid mixing.Membrane fusion is an essential step during the entry process of enveloped viruses, such as herpes simplex virus (HSV), into target cells. The general pathway by which enveloped viruses fuse with target membranes through the action of fusion proteins is fairly well understood. Viral fusion proteins use the free energy liberated during their own protein conformational changes to draw the two membranes—viral and target—together. Fusion is thought to proceed through a “hemifusion” intermediate, in which the proximal leaflets of the two bilayers have merged but a viral pore has not yet formed and viral contents have not yet mixed with the cell cytoplasm (10, 38). Fusion proteins then drive the completion of fusion, which includes fusion pore formation, pore enlargement, and complete content mixing.HSV, an enveloped neurotropic virus, requires four glycoproteins—glycoprotein B (gB), glycoprotein D (gD), glycoprotein H (gH), and glycoprotein L (gL)—to execute fusion (9, 57, 60). gB, gD, and gH are membrane bound; gL is a soluble protein which complexes with gH to form a heterodimer (gH/gL). HSV-1 gH is not trafficked to the cell or virion surface in the absence of gL (32, 52). The requirement of four entry glycoproteins sets HSV apart from other enveloped viruses, most of which induce fusion through the activity of a single fusion protein. Although the specific mode of HSV entry is cell type dependent—fusion with neurons and Vero cells occurs at the plasma membrane at neutral pH; fusion with HeLa and CHO cells involves pH-dependent endocytosis, and fusion with C10 cells involves pH-independent endocytosis (42, 45)—all routes of entry require gD, gB, and gH/gL. Furthermore, although some discrepancies between virus-cell and cell-cell fusion have been observed (8, 44, 55, 58), both generally require the actions of gD, gB, and gH/gL.Much work has gone toward the understanding of how the required HSV entry glycoproteins work together to accomplish fusion, and many questions remain. After viral attachment, mediated by glycoprotein C and/or gB (54), the first step in HSV fusion is thought to be gD binding a host cell receptor (either herpesvirus entry mediator [HVEM], nectin-1, nectin-2, or heparan sulfate modified by specific 3-O-sulfotransferases) (56). The gD-receptor interaction induces a conformational change in gD (39) that is thought to trigger gD-gB and/or gD-gH/gL interactions that are required for the progression of fusion (1-4, 13, 18, 23, 49).gB and gH/gL are considered the core fusion machinery of most herpesviruses. The HSV-1 gB structure revealed surprising structural homology to the postfusion structures of two known viral fusion proteins (31, 35, 51). This structural homology indicates that despite not being sufficient for HSV fusion, gB is likely a fusion protein. Although the gB cytoplasmic tail (CT) is not included in the solved structure, it acts as a regulator of fusion, as CT truncations can cause either hyperfusion or fusion-null phenotypes (5, 17). The gB CT has been proposed to bind stably to lipid membranes and negatively regulate membrane fusion (12). Another proposed regulator of gB function is gH/gL. Despite conflicting accounts of whether gD and a gD receptor are required for the interaction of gH/gL and gB (1, 3, 4), a recent study indicates that gH/gL and gB interact prior to fusion and that gB may interact with target membranes prior to an interaction with gH/gL (2). The gB-gH/gL interaction seems to be required for the progression of fusion.Compared to the other required HSV entry glycoproteins, the role of gH/gL during fusion remains enigmatic. Mutational studies have revealed several regions of the gH ectodomain, transmembrane domain (TM), and CT that are required for its function (19, 25, 26, 30, 33). gH/gL of another herpesvirus, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), have been shown to bind integrins during epithelial cell fusion, and soluble forms of HSV gH/gL have been shown to bind cells and inhibit viral entry in vitro (24, 46). However, the role of gH/gL binding to target cells in regard to the fusion process remains to be determined.There are some lines of evidence that suggest that gH/gL is a fusion protein. The gH/gL complexes of VZV and CMV have been reported to independently execute some level of cell-cell fusion (14, 37). HSV-1 gH/gL has been reported to independently mediate membrane fusion during nuclear egress (15). In silico analyses and studies of synthetic HSV gH peptides have proposed that gH has fusogenic properties (20, 21, 25-28). Finally, of most importance to the work we report here, gH/gL has been shown to be sufficient for induction of hemifusion in the presence of gD and a gD receptor, further promoting the premise that gH/gL is a fusion protein (59). However, the recently solved crystal structure of HSV-2 gH/gL revealed a tight complex of gH/gL in a “boot-like” structure, which bears no structural homology to any known fusion proteins (11). The HSV-2 gH/gL structure and research demonstrating that gH/gL and gB interactions are critical to fusion (2) have together prompted a new model of HSV fusion in which gH/gL is required to either negatively or positively regulate the activity of gB through direct binding.We wanted to investigate the ability of a previously reported gH CT mutant, 824L, to execute hemifusion. 824L gH contains a five-residue insertion at gH residue 824, just C-terminal of the TM domain. 824L is expressed on cell surfaces and incorporated into virions at levels indistinguishable from those of wild-type gH by either cell-based ELISA or immunoblotting, yet it is nonfunctional (33). We relied on a fusion assay capable of detecting hemifusion, developed by Subramanian et al. (59), which we modified to include an additional control for hemifusion or nonenlarging pore formation, glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-linked hemagglutinin (GPI-HA). GPI-HA is a variant of the influenza virus fusion protein, HA, that is known to stall the fusion process before enlarging fusion pores are formed.We were surprised to find that in our hands, gD, a gD receptor, and gH/gL were insufficient for the induction of hemifusion or lipid mixing in both cell-based and virus-based fusion assays. We found that gD, gB, and gH/gL are all required to observe lipid mixing. Further, we found that gB, gD, gL, and 824L gH are insufficient for lipid mixing. Our findings support the emerging view, based on gH/gL structure, that the gH/gL complex does not function as a fusion protein and does not insert into target membranes to initiate the process of fusion through a hemifusion intermediate. Our findings also further demonstrate that mutations in the CT of gH can have a dramatic effect on the ability of gH/gL to function in fusion.