Detecting susceptibility genes in case-control studies using set association

Complex diseases are generally caused by intricate interactions of multiple genes and environmental factors. Most available linkage and association methods are developed to identify individual susceptibility genes assuming a simple disease model blind to any possible gene - gene and gene - environmental interactions. We used a set association method that uses single-nucleotide polymorphism markers to locate genetic variation responsible for complex diseases in which multiple genes are involved. Here we extended the set association method from bi-allelic to multiallelic markers. In addition, we studied the type I error rates and power for both approaches using simulations based on the coalescent process. Both bi-allelic set association (BSA) and multiallelic set association (MSA) tests have the correct type I error rates. In addition, BSA and MSA can have more power than individual marker analysis when multiple genes are involved in a complex disease. We applied the MSA approach to the simulated data sets from Genetic Analysis Workshop 13. High cholesterol level was used as the definitive phenotype for a disease. MSA failed to detect markers with significant linkage disequilibrium with genes responsible for cholesterol level. This is due to the wide spacing between the markers and the lack of association between the marker loci and the simulated phenotype.     

Assessment of gene set analysis methods based on microarray data

Gene set analysis (GSA) incorporates biological information into statistical knowledge to identify gene sets differently expressed between two or more phenotypes. It allows us to gain an insight into the functional working mechanism of cells beyond the detection of differently expressed gene sets. In order to evaluate the competence of GSA approaches, three self-contained GSA approaches with different statistical methods were chosen; Category, Globaltest and Hotelling's T² together with their assayed power to identify the differences expressed via simulation and real microarray data. The Category does not take care of the correlation structure, while the other two deal with correlations.     

The role of phenotype in gene discovery in the whole genome sequencing era

As whole genome sequence becomes a routine component of gene discovery studies in humans, we will have an exhaustive catalog of genetic variation and the challenge becomes understanding the phenotypic consequences of these variants. Statistical genetic methods and analytical approaches that are concerned with optimizing phenotypes for gene discovery for complex traits offer two general categories of advantages. They may increase power to localize genes of interest and also aid in interpreting associations between genetic variants and disease outcomes by suggesting potential mechanisms and pathways through which genes may affect outcomes. Such phenotype optimization approaches include use of allied phenotypes such as symptoms or ages of onset to reduce genetic heterogeneity within a set of cases, study of quantitative risk factors or endophenotypes, joint analyses of related phenotypes, and derivation of new phenotypes designed to extract independent measures underlying the correlations among a set of related phenotypes through approaches such as principal components. New opportunities are also presented by technological advances that permit efficient collection of hundreds or thousands of phenotypes on an individual, including phenotypes more proximal to the level of gene action such as levels of gene expression, microRNAs, or metabolic and proteomic profiles.     

Gene set analysis of genome-wide association studies: methodological issues and perspectives

Recent studies have demonstrated that gene set analysis, which tests disease association with genetic variants in a group of functionally related genes, is a promising approach for analyzing and interpreting genome-wide association studies (GWAS) data. These approaches aim to increase power by combining association signals from multiple genes in the same gene set. In addition, gene set analysis can also shed more light on the biological processes underlying complex diseases. However, current approaches for gene set analysis are still in an early stage of development in that analysis results are often prone to sources of bias, including gene set size and gene length, linkage disequilibrium patterns and the presence of overlapping genes. In this paper, we provide an in-depth review of the gene set analysis procedures, along with parameter choices and the particular methodology challenges at each stage. In addition to providing a survey of recently developed tools, we also classify the analysis methods into larger categories and discuss their strengths and limitations. In the last section, we outline several important areas for improving the analytical strategies in gene set analysis.     

Identifying Gene Interaction Enrichment for Gene Expression Data

Gene set analysis allows the inclusion of knowledge from established gene sets, such as gene pathways, and potentially improves the power of detecting differentially expressed genes. However, conventional methods of gene set analysis focus on gene marginal effects in a gene set, and ignore gene interactions which may contribute to complex human diseases. In this study, we propose a method of gene interaction enrichment analysis, which incorporates knowledge of predefined gene sets (e.g. gene pathways) to identify enriched gene interaction effects on a phenotype of interest. In our proposed method, we also discuss the reduction of irrelevant genes and the extraction of a core set of gene interactions for an identified gene set, which contribute to the statistical variation of a phenotype of interest. The utility of our method is demonstrated through analyses on two publicly available microarray datasets. The results show that our method can identify gene sets that show strong gene interaction enrichments. The enriched gene interactions identified by our method may provide clues to new gene regulation mechanisms related to the studied phenotypes. In summary, our method offers a powerful tool for researchers to exhaustively examine the large numbers of gene interactions associated with complex human diseases, and can be a useful complement to classical gene set analyses which only considers single genes in a gene set.     

Competitive Genomic Screens of Barcoded Yeast Libraries

By virtue of advances in next generation sequencing technologies, we have access to new genome sequences almost daily. The tempo of these advances is accelerating, promising greater depth and breadth. In light of these extraordinary advances, the need for fast, parallel methods to define gene function becomes ever more important. Collections of genome-wide deletion mutants in yeasts and E. coli have served as workhorses for functional characterization of gene function, but this approach is not scalable, current gene-deletion approaches require each of the thousands of genes that comprise a genome to be deleted and verified. Only after this work is complete can we pursue high-throughput phenotyping. Over the past decade, our laboratory has refined a portfolio of competitive, miniaturized, high-throughput genome-wide assays that can be performed in parallel. This parallelization is possible because of the inclusion of DNA ''tags'', or ''barcodes,'' into each mutant, with the barcode serving as a proxy for the mutation and one can measure the barcode abundance to assess mutant fitness. In this study, we seek to fill the gap between DNA sequence and barcoded mutant collections. To accomplish this we introduce a combined transposon disruption-barcoding approach that opens up parallel barcode assays to newly sequenced, but poorly characterized microbes. To illustrate this approach we present a new Candida albicans barcoded disruption collection and describe how both microarray-based and next generation sequencing-based platforms can be used to collect 10,000 - 1,000,000 gene-gene and drug-gene interactions in a single experiment.     

Likelihood-Based Approach to Gene Set Enrichment Analysis with a Finite Mixture Model

In this paper, we study a parametric modeling approach to gene set enrichment analysis. Existing methods have largely relied on nonparametric approaches employing, e.g., categorization, permutation or resampling-based significance analysis methods. These methods have proven useful yet might not be powerful. By formulating the enrichment analysis into a model comparison problem, we adopt the likelihood ratio-based testing approach to assess significance of enrichment. Through simulation studies and application to gene expression data, we will illustrate the competitive performance of the proposed method.     

Constructing a gene semantic similarity network for the inference of disease genes

MOTIVATION: The inference of genes that are truly associated with inherited human diseases from a set of candidates resulting from genetic linkage studies has been one of the most challenging tasks in human genetics. Although several computational approaches have been proposed to prioritize candidate genes relying on protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks, these methods can usually cover less than half of known human genes. RESULTS: We propose to rely on the biological process domain of the gene ontology to construct a gene semantic similarity network and then use the network to infer disease genes. We show that the constructed network covers about 50% more genes than a typical PPI network. By analyzing the gene semantic similarity network with the PPI network, we show that gene pairs tend to have higher semantic similarity scores if the corresponding proteins are closer to each other in the PPI network. By analyzing the gene semantic similarity network with a phenotype similarity network, we show that semantic similarity scores of genes associated with similar diseases are significantly different from those of genes selected at random, and that genes with higher semantic similarity scores tend to be associated with diseases with higher phenotype similarity scores. We further use the gene semantic similarity network with a random walk with restart model to infer disease genes. Through a series of large-scale leave-one-out cross-validation experiments, we show that the gene semantic similarity network can achieve not only higher coverage but also higher accuracy than the PPI network in the inference of disease genes.     

Analyzing gene expression data in terms of gene sets: methodological issues

MOTIVATION: Many statistical tests have been proposed in recent years for analyzing gene expression data in terms of gene sets, usually from Gene Ontology. These methods are based on widely different methodological assumptions. Some approaches test differential expression of each gene set against differential expression of the rest of the genes, whereas others test each gene set on its own. Also, some methods are based on a model in which the genes are the sampling units, whereas others treat the subjects as the sampling units. This article aims to clarify the assumptions behind different approaches and to indicate a preferential methodology of gene set testing. RESULTS: We identify some crucial assumptions which are needed by the majority of methods. P-values derived from methods that use a model which takes the genes as the sampling unit are easily misinterpreted, as they are based on a statistical model that does not resemble the biological experiment actually performed. Furthermore, because these models are based on a crucial and unrealistic independence assumption between genes, the P-values derived from such methods can be wildly anti-conservative, as a simulation experiment shows. We also argue that methods that competitively test each gene set against the rest of the genes create an unnecessary rift between single gene testing and gene set testing.     

HykGene: a hybrid approach for selecting marker genes for phenotype classification using microarray gene expression data

MOTIVATION: Recent studies have shown that microarray gene expression data are useful for phenotype classification of many diseases. A major problem in this classification is that the number of features (genes) greatly exceeds the number of instances (tissue samples). It has been shown that selecting a small set of informative genes can lead to improved classification accuracy. Many approaches have been proposed for this gene selection problem. Most of the previous gene ranking methods typically select 50-200 top-ranked genes and these genes are often highly correlated. Our goal is to select a small set of non-redundant marker genes that are most relevant for the classification task. RESULTS: To achieve this goal, we developed a novel hybrid approach that combines gene ranking and clustering analysis. In this approach, we first applied feature filtering algorithms to select a set of top-ranked genes, and then applied hierarchical clustering on these genes to generate a dendrogram. Finally, the dendrogram was analyzed by a sweep-line algorithm and marker genes are selected by collapsing dense clusters. Empirical study using three public datasets shows that our approach is capable of selecting relatively few marker genes while offering the same or better leave-one-out cross-validation accuracy compared with approaches that use top-ranked genes directly for classification. AVAILABILITY: The HykGene software is freely available at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wyh/software.htm CONTACT: wyh@cs.dartmouth.edu SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary material is available from http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wyh/hykgene/supplement/index.htm.     

Kernel machine approach to testing the significance of multiple genetic markers for risk prediction

There is growing evidence that genomic and proteomic research holds great potential for changing irrevocably the practice of medicine. The ability to identify important genomic and biological markers for risk assessment can have a great impact in public health from disease prevention, to detection, to treatment selection. However, the potentially large number of markers and the complexity in the relationship between the markers and the outcome of interest impose a grand challenge in developing accurate risk prediction models. The standard approach to identifying important markers often assesses the marginal effects of individual markers on a phenotype of interest. When multiple markers relate to the phenotype simultaneously via a complex structure, such a type of marginal analysis may not be effective. To overcome such difficulties, we employ a kernel machine Cox regression framework and propose an efficient score test to assess the overall effect of a set of markers, such as genes within a pathway or a network, on survival outcomes. The proposed test has the advantage of capturing the potentially nonlinear effects without explicitly specifying a particular nonlinear functional form. To approximate the null distribution of the score statistic, we propose a simple resampling procedure that can be easily implemented in practice. Numerical studies suggest that the test performs well with respect to both empirical size and power even when the number of variables in a gene set is not small compared to the sample size.     

Functional cohesion of gene sets determined by latent semantic indexing of PubMed abstracts

High-throughput genomic technologies enable researchers to identify genes that are co-regulated with respect to specific experimental conditions. Numerous statistical approaches have been developed to identify differentially expressed genes. Because each approach can produce distinct gene sets, it is difficult for biologists to determine which statistical approach yields biologically relevant gene sets and is appropriate for their study. To address this issue, we implemented Latent Semantic Indexing (LSI) to determine the functional coherence of gene sets. An LSI model was built using over 1 million Medline abstracts for over 20,000 mouse and human genes annotated in Entrez Gene. The gene-to-gene LSI-derived similarities were used to calculate a literature cohesion p-value (LPv) for a given gene set using a Fisher's exact test. We tested this method against genes in more than 6,000 functional pathways annotated in Gene Ontology (GO) and found that approximately 75% of gene sets in GO biological process category and 90% of the gene sets in GO molecular function and cellular component categories were functionally cohesive (LPv<0.05). These results indicate that the LPv methodology is both robust and accurate. Application of this method to previously published microarray datasets demonstrated that LPv can be helpful in selecting the appropriate feature extraction methods. To enable real-time calculation of LPv for mouse or human gene sets, we developed a web tool called Gene-set Cohesion Analysis Tool (GCAT). GCAT can complement other gene set enrichment approaches by determining the overall functional cohesion of data sets, taking into account both explicit and implicit gene interactions reported in the biomedical literature. Availability: GCAT is freely available at http://binf1.memphis.edu/gcat.     

A regression-based approach to selection mapping

Selection mapping applies the population genetics theory of hitchhiking to the localization of genomic regions containing genes under selection. This approach predicts that neutral loci linked to genes under positive selection will have reduced diversity due to their shared history with a selected locus, and thus, genome scans of diversity levels can be used to identify regions containing selected loci. Most previous approaches to this problem ignore the spatial genomic pattern of diversity expected under selection. The regression-based approach advocated in this paper takes into account the expected pattern of decreasing genetic diversity with increased proximity to a selected locus. Simulated data are used to examine the patterns of diversity under different scenarios, in order to assess the power of a regression-based approach to the identification of regions under selection. Application of this method to both simulated and empirical data demonstrates its potential to detect selection. In contrast to some other methods, the regression approach described in this paper can be applied to any marker type. Results also suggest that this approach may give more precise estimates of the location of the selected locus than alternative methods, although the power is slightly lower in some cases.     

Methods for detecting gene x gene interaction in multiplex extended pedigrees

Complex diseases are multifactorial in nature and can involve multiple loci with gene x gene and gene x environment interactions. Research on methods to uncover the interactions between those genes that confer susceptibility to disease has been extensive, but many of these methods have only been developed for sibling pairs or sibships. In this report, we assess the performance of two methods for finding gene x gene interactions that are applicable to arbitrarily sized pedigrees, one based on correlation in per-family nonparametric linkage scores and another that incorporates candidate loci genotypes as covariates into an affected relative pair linkage analysis. The power and type I error rate of both of these methods was addressed using the simulated Genetic Analysis Workshop 14 data. In general, we found detection of the interacting loci to be a difficult problem, and though we experienced some modest success there is a clear need to continue developing new methods and approaches to the problem.     

From QTL to QTN: Candidate Gene Set Approach and a Case Study in Porcine IGF1-FoxO Pathway

Unraveling the genetic background of economic traits is a major goal in modern animal genetics and breeding. Both candidate gene analysis and QTL mapping have previously been used for identifying genes and chromosome regions related to studied traits. However, most of these studies may be limited in their ability to fully consider how multiple genetic factors may influence a particular phenotype of interest. If possible, taking advantage of the combined effect of multiple genetic factors is expected to be more powerful than analyzing single sites, as the joint action of multiple loci within a gene or across multiple genes acting in the same gene set will likely have a greater influence on phenotypic variation. Thus, we proposed a pipeline of gene set analysis that utilized information from multiple loci to improve statistical power. We assessed the performance of this approach by both simulated and a real IGF1-FoxO pathway data set. The results showed that our new method can identify the association between genetic variation and phenotypic variation with higher statistical power and unravel the mechanisms of complex traits in a point of gene set. Additionally, the proposed pipeline is flexible to be extended to model complex genetic structures that include the interactions between different gene sets and between gene sets and environments.     

Genomic characterization of multiple clinical phenotypes of cancer using multivariate linear regression models

MOTIVATION: The development of gene expression microarray technology has allowed the identification of differentially expressed genes between different clinical phenotypic classes of cancer from a large pool of candidate genes. Although many class comparisons concerned only a single phenotype, simultaneous assessment of the relationship between gene expression and multiple phenotypes would be warranted to better understand the underlying biological structure. RESULTS: We develop a method to select genes related to multiple clinical phenotypes based on a set of multivariate linear regression models. For each gene, we perform model selection based on the doubly-adjusted R-square statistic and use the maximum of this statistic for gene selection. The method can substantially improve the power in gene selection, compared with a conventional method that uses a single model exclusively for gene selection. Application to a bladder cancer study to correlate pre-treatment gene expressions with pathological stage and grade is given. The methods would be useful for screening for genes related to multiple clinical phenotypes. AVAILABILITY: SAS and MATLAB codes are available from author upon request.     

Comparing mixed models and Random Forest association tests using naturalgwas and a Striped Bass SNP data set

In this study, we used the phenotype simulation package naturalgwas to test the performance of Zhao's Random Forest method in comparison to an uncorrected Random Forest test, latent factor mixed models (LFMM), genome-wide efficient mixed models (GEMMA), and confounder adjusted linear regression (CATE). We created 400 sets of phenotypes, corresponding to five effect sizes and two, five, 15, or 30 causal loci, simulated from two empirical data sets containing SNPs from Striped Bass representing three and 13 populations. All association methods were evaluated for their ability to detect genotype–phenotype associations based on power, false discovery rates, and number of false positives. Genomic inflation was highest for uncorrected Random Forest and LFMM tests and lowest for Gemma and Zhao's Random Forest. All association tests had similar power to detect causal loci, and Zhao's Random Forest had the lowest false discovery rate in all scenarios. To measure the performance of association tests in small data sets with few loci surrounding a causal gene we also ran analyses again after removing causal loci from each data set. All association tests were only able to find true positives, defined as loci located within 30 kbp of a causal locus, in 3%–18% of simulations. In contrast, at least one false positive was found in 17%–44% of simulations. Zhao's Random Forest again identified the fewest false positives of all association tests studied. The ability to test the power of association tests for individual empirical data sets can be an extremely useful first step when designing a GWAS study.     

Rotation gene set testing for longitudinal expression data

Gene set analysis methods are popular tools for identifying differentially expressed gene sets in microarray data. Most existing methods use a permutation test to assess significance for each gene set. The permutation test's assumption of exchangeable samples is often not satisfied for time‐series data and complex experimental designs, and in addition it requires a certain number of samples to compute p‐values accurately. The method presented here uses a rotation test rather than a permutation test to assess significance. The rotation test can compute accurate p‐values also for very small sample sizes. The method can handle complex designs and is particularly suited for longitudinal microarray data where the samples may have complex correlation structures. Dependencies between genes, modeled with the use of gene networks, are incorporated in the estimation of correlations between samples. In addition, the method can test for both gene sets that are differentially expressed and gene sets that show strong time trends. We show on simulated longitudinal data that the ability to identify important gene sets may be improved by taking the correlation structure between samples into account. Applied to real data, the method identifies both gene sets with constant expression and gene sets with strong time trends.     

Testing gene set enrichment for subset of genes: Sub-GSE

Background  

Many methods have been developed to test the enrichment of genes related to certain phenotypes or cell states in gene sets. These approaches usually combine gene expression data with functionally related gene sets as defined in databases such as GeneOntology (GO), KEGG, or BioCarta. The results based on gene set analysis are generally more biologically interpretable, accurate and robust than the results based on individual gene analysis. However, while most available methods for gene set enrichment analysis test the enrichment of the entire gene set, it is more likely that only a subset of the genes in the gene set may be related to the phenotypes of interest.