Mutant λ Repressors with Increased Operator Affinities Reveal New, Specific Protein-DNA Contacts

The binding specificities of four mutant lambda cI repressor proteins with increased affinities for operator DNA were examined. Two mutant repressors (Glu34----Lys and Glu83----Lys) have the same specificity of binding as wild-type repressor, whereas two (Gly48----Ser and Gly48----Asn) have new binding specificities. The Gly48----Asn mutant repressor recognizes lambda operators with changes at base pair 3 with a different order of affinity than wild-type repressor, suggesting that the side chain of Asn48 makes additional specific DNA contacts at or near this base pair. When paired with a change that disrupts the specific interaction of the amino-terminal arm of lambda repressor with DNA (Lys4----Gln), one change that increases the affinity of repressor (Gly48----Ser) suppresses the binding defect of the Lys4----Gln repressor, resulting in a double mutant repressor with a new binding specificity different than that of both its parents and of wild type. These results lend strong support to the model of direct recognition of the lambda operator by lambda repressor proposed from the crystal structure of the repressor/operator complex.     

Lac repressor with the helix-turn-helix motif of lambda cro binds to lac operator.

Lac repressor, lambda cro protein and their operator complexes are structurally, biochemically and genetically well analysed. Both proteins contain a helix-turn-helix (HTH) motif which they use to bind specifically to their operators. The DNA sequences 5'-GTGA-3' and 5'-TCAC-3' recognized in palindromic lac operator are the same as in lambda operator but their order is inverted form head to head to tail to tail. Different modes of aggregation of the monomers of the two proteins determine the different arrangements of the HTH motifs. Here we show that the HTH motif of lambda cro protein can replace the HTH motif of Lac repressor without changing its specificity. Such hybrid Lac repressor is unstable. It binds in vitro more weakly than Lac repressor but with the same specificity to ideal lac operator. It does not bind to consensus lambda operator.     

In vitro binding of LexA repressor to DNA: evidence for the involvement of the amino-terminal domain.

Both the amino-terminal and the carboxy-terminal domain of the LexA repressor have been purified using the LexA protein autodigestion reaction at alkaline pH, which leads to the same specific products as the physiological RecA-catalyzed proteolysis of repressor. We show by circular dichroism (c.d) that, upon non-specific binding to DNA, the purified amino-terminal domain induces a very similar if not identical conformational change of the DNA as does the entire repressor. The positive c.d. signal increases approximately 3-fold if the DNA lattice is fully saturated with protein. Further, the amino-terminal domain of the LexA protein binds specifically to the operator of the recA gene, producing qualitatively the same effects on the methylation pattern of the guanine bases by dimethylsulfate as the entire repressor, consisting of a methylation inhibition effect at four distal operator guanines and a slight enhancement at the central bases. The spacing between these contacts suggests that LexA does not bind to the operator along the same face of the DNA helix. As shown by c.d. studies the amino-terminal domain harbours a substantial amount of residues in alpha-helical conformation, a prerequisite for DNA recognition via a helix--turn--helix structural motif as proposed for many other regulatory proteins.     

Molecular dynamics simulation reveals sequence-intrinsic and protein-induced geometrical features of the OL1 DNA operator

We have carried out molecular dynamics simulation of the lambda OL1 DNA operator on the free and the protein-bound forms. Our results lead us to conclude that the binding of the repressor actually makes the N-7 atom of Gua8' more solvent exposed, thereby enhancing its reactivity to chemical methylation. This increase in solvent accessibility surface area occurs simultaneously with the formation of hydrogen bonds between Lys-4 of the nonconsensus flexible N-terminal arm and Gua6' of the nonconsensus half-site operator DNA. Calculations of protein--DNA interaction energies reveal that among the residues of the arm, Lys-4 contributes the most favorably to the interaction energies. This result is consistent with mutagenesis studies that established that lysine at position 4 is absolutely required for tight binding. We find that the nonconsensus arm and the nonconsensus monomer interacts less favorably with DNA than do their respective counterparts of the consensus monomer. Moreover, the six-residue flexible arm accounts for at least half the total protein--DNA interactions energy. These results are in agreement with previous experimental studies. In accord with the diffuse electron density map observed in crystallographic studies of the nonconsensus flexible arm, we find that our model built for this region is more flexible and exhibits more conformations than its consensus counterpart. The simulation also reveals that DNA bending observed near the outer edge of the operator site is an intrinsic sequence-dependent property. By contrast, the DNA-bending features observed toward the center of the operator are induced by the protein. On the whole, stepwise protein-induced bending is more pronounced in the consensus half-site operator. We also find that the unusually large helical twist (49 degrees ) observed in the protein-bound form near the center of the operator results from the binding of the protein at a base step with some propensity for high twists.     

Template-directed interference footprinting of cytosine contacts in a protein-DNA complex: potent interference by 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine.

In the template-directed interference (TDI) footprinting method (Hayashibara & Verdine, 1990), analogs of the naturally occurring DNA bases are incorporated into DNA enzymatically and assayed for interference of sequence-specific binding by a protein. Here we extend this method to include analysis of contacts of amino acid residues to the major groove surface of cytosine residues (TDI-C footprinting). The base analog 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine, in which the hydrophobic 5-CH of cytosine is replaced by a hydrophilic aza nitrogen, was incorporated into DNA via the corresponding 5'-triphosphate. The analog was found to base pair with guanine during polymerization, resulting in substitution of 2'-deoxycytidine residues. TDI-C footprints of the lambda repressor-OL1 operator complex revealed apparent contacts to the cytosines at operator positions 7 and 8. Inspection of the high-resolution X-ray crystal structure of the lambda-OL1 complex (Clarke et al., 1992; Beamer & Pabo, 1992) revealed that C8 makes a hydrogen binding contact with the Lys3; C7, on the other hand, makes a previously unnoticed hydrophobic contact with the alkane side chain of Lys3. In only the consensus operator half-site was cytosine interference observed, suggesting that the nonconsensus arm binds DNA very differently if at all. The N-terminal arm represents the archetypal case of a sequence-specific peptide-DNA complex characterized at high resolution; thus, the present studies suggest strategies for design and screening of DNA binding peptides. The finding that 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine inhibits sequence-specific DNA binding proteins may suggest an alternative rationale for the biological activities of this and related azapyrimidine nucleosides.     

How lambda repressor and lambda Cro distinguish between OR1 and OR3

Although lambda repressor and lambda Cro bind to the same six operators on the phage chromosome, the fine specificities of the two proteins differ: repressor binds more tightly to OR1 than to OR3, and vice versa for Cro. In this paper, we change base pairs in the operators and amino acids in the proteins to analyze the basis for these preferences. We find that these preferences are determined by residues 5 and 6 of the recognition helices of the two proteins and by the amino-terminal arm, in the case of repressor. We also find that the most important base pairs in the operator which enable repressor and Cro to discriminate between OR1 and OR3 are position 3 (for Cro) and positions 5 and 8 (for repressor). These and previous results show how repressor and Cro recognize and distinguish between two related operator sequences.     

Contacts between the LexA repressor--or its DNA-binding domain--and the backbone of the recA operator DNA.

Using hydroxyl radical footprinting and ethylation interference experiments, we have determined the backbone contacts made by the entire LexA repressor and its amino-terminal fragment with the recA operator DNA. These techniques reveal essentially the same contacts between both proteins and one side of the DNA helix if one assumes that the DNA stays in the normal B-conformation. This result is somewhat unexpected because protection of guanine bases against methylation suggested a somewhat twisted recognition surface. The backbone contacts revealed by both methods are symmetrically disposed with respect to the center of the operator, providing further evidence that the operator binds two LexA monomers. Each half-operator contains seven interfering phosphates. These phosphates are found on both sides of the 5'-CTGT sequence that is believed to be the principal recognition target. On the side close to the center of the operator are found two phosphates, whereas the other five are clustered on the side apart from the dyad axis. We are not aware of such an extended cluster of interfering phosphates for any other DNA-binding protein. A quantification of the hydroxyl radical footprints allowed us to compare further the affinity of the LexA repressor for the recA operator with that of its isolated DNA binding domain. We find an only 13-fold higher binding constant for LexA than for its amino-terminal domain, which is in good agreement with our earlier results for the uvrA operator using a completely different binding assay.     

Binding of the arginine repressor of Escherichia coli K12 to its operator sites.

In the arginine regulon of Escherichia coli K12 each of the eight operator sites consists of two 18-base-pair-long palindromic sequences called ARG boxes. In the operator sites for the structural genes of the regulon the two ARG boxes are separated by three base-pairs, in the regulatory gene argR they are separated by two base-pairs. The hexameric arginine repressor, the product of argR, binds to the two ARG boxes in an operator in the presence of L-arginine. From the results of various kinds of in vitro footprinting experiments with the ARG boxes of argF and argR (DNase I protection, hydroxyl radical, ethylation and methylation interference, methylation protection) it can be concluded that: (1) the repressor binds simultaneously to two adjacent ARG boxes; (2) that it binds on one face of the double helix; and (3) that it forms contacts with the major and minor grooves of each ARG box, but not with the central three base-pairs. The repressor can bind also to a single ARG box, but its affinity is about 100-fold lower than for two ARG boxes. From gel retardation experiments with 3H-labeled repressor and 32P-labeled argF operator DNA, it is concluded that the retarded DNA-protein complex contains no more than one repressor molecule per operator site and that most likely one hexamer binds to two ARG boxes. The bound repressor was shown to induce bending of argF operator DNA. The bending angle calculated from the results of gel retardation experiments is about 70 degrees and the bending center was located within the region encompassing the ARG boxes. The main features that distinguish the arginine repressor from other repressors studied in E. coli are its hexameric nature and the simultaneous binding of one hexameric molecule to two palindromic ARG boxes that are close to each other.     

Refined 1.8 A crystal structure of the lambda repressor-operator complex.

The crystal structure of the lambda repressor-operator complex has been refined to an R-factor of 18.9% at 1.8 A resolution. This refinement, using data collected at low temperature, has revealed the structure of the N-terminal arm and shows that the interactions of repressor with the two halves of the pseudo-symmetric operator site are significantly different. The two halves of the complex are most similar near the outer edge of the operator site (in a region where the lambda and 434 repressors make similar contacts), but they become increasingly different toward the center of the operator. There are striking differences near the center of the site where it appears that the arm makes significant contacts to only one half of the DNA site. This suggested a new way of aligning the operator sites in phage lambda. The high resolution structure confirms many of the previously noted features of the complex, but also reveals a number of new protein-DNA contacts. It also gives a better view of the extensive H-bonding networks that couple contacts made by different residues and different regions of the protein, and reveals important new details about the helix-turn-helix (HTH) region, and the positions of many water molecules in the complex.     

DNA-binding site of lac repressor probed by dimethylsulfate methylation of lac operator.

In order to compare the structures of the DNA-binding sites on variants of the lac repressor, we have studied the influence of these variants on the dimethylsulfate methylation of the lac operator. Since a bound protein changes the availability of specific purines in the operator to this chemical attack, comparisons of the methylation patterns will show similarities or differences in the protein DNA contacts. We compared lac repressor, induced lac repressor (repressor bound to the gratuitous inducer isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactoside), mutant repressors having increased operator affinities (X86, I12 and the X86-I12 double mutant) and repressor peptides (long headpiece, residues 1 to 59 and short headpiece. residues 1 to 51). All of these repressors and repressor peptides exhibit the same general pattern of protection and enhancement in the operator; however, the short headpiece pattern differs most from that of the repressor while the induced repressor and the long headpiece show intermediate patterns that are strikingly similar to each other. The mutant repressors do not show an isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactoside effect but otherwise are almost indistinguishable from wild-type repressor. These results demonstrate that all molecules bind to the operator using basically the same protein-DNA contacts; they imply that (1) most and possibly all repressor contacts to operator lie within amino acids 1 to 51, (2) inducer weakens many contacts rather than totally disrupting one or even a few and (3) the tight-binding mutants do not make additional contacts to the DNA.These results are consistent with a model in which the amino-terminal portions of two repressor monomers make the DNA contacts. We show that one can understand the affinity of binding as related to the accuracy of the register of the two amino-terminal portions along the DNA. Furthermore, the action of inducer and the behaviour of the tight binding mutants can be accomodated within a two-state model in which the strongly or weakly binding states correspond to structures in which the amino-terminal regions are rigidly or loosely held with respect to each other.     

Comparison of the structures of cro and lambda repressor proteins from bacteriophage lambda

The three-dimensional structures of cro repressor protein and of the amino-terminal domain of lambda repressor protein, both from bacteriophage lambda, are compared. The second and third alpha-helices, alpha 2 and alpha 3, are shown to have essentially identical conformations in the two proteins, confirming the significance of the amino acid sequence homology previously noted between these and other DNA binding proteins in the region corresponding to these helices. The correspondence between the two-helical units in cro and lambda repressor protein is better than the striking agreement noted previously between two-helical units in cro and catabolite gene-activator protein. Parts of the first alpha-helices of repressor and cro show a structural correspondence that suggests a revised sequence homology between the two proteins in their extreme amino-terminal regions. In particular, there is a short loop between the alpha 1 and alpha 2 helices of lambda repressor that is missing from cro. This structural difference may account for the observed differences found with different cros and repressors in the pattern of phosphates whose ethylation prevents the binding of these proteins to their specific recognition sites. Although the two proteins have strikingly similar alpha 2-alpha 3 helical units that are presumed to bind to DNA in an essentially similar manner, stereochemical restrictions prevent the alpha 2-alpha 3 units of the respective proteins aligning on the DNA in exactly the same way.     

Purification and properties of Gal repressor:pL-galR fusion in pKC31 plasmid vector

The galR gene, which encodes the Gal repressor protein in Escherichia coli, has been fused to the strong pL promoter of bacteriophage lambda in plasmid pKC31. The pL promoter is kept repressed by a thermolabilie lambda repressor, CIts857, to prevent cell killing. Heat induction of the pL-galR fusion plasmid synthesizes large amounts of active Gal repressor. The protein has been purified to homogeneity in three steps. The purification is greatly aided by the reversible insolubility of active repressor in crude extract at salt concentrations of less than 200 mM. The amino-terminal amino acid sequence determined by automated Edman degradation is: N-Ala-Thr-Ile-Lys-Asp-Val-Ala-Arg-Leu-Ala-Gly-Val-Ser-Val-Ala-Thr-Val-. Comparison of this sequence with that deduced from the DNA sequence of the galR gene showed that the formyl methionine residue preceding alanine at position 1 is cleaved off. The repressor is present in solution as a dimer of a 37-kDa subunit. The protein binds to gal DNA containing wild type and not mutant operator sequences. As predicted, this sequence-specific binding is inhibited by the presence of D-galactose or D-fucose, both of which are in vivo inducers of the gal operon. Gal repressor inhibits the expresison of gal operon by binding to two spatially separated operators which flank, but do not overlap, the gal promoter segment. Experiments to study the mechanism of repressor action are discussed.     

How does trp repressor bind to its operator?

Three explanations have been advanced to account for the unexpected absence of direct hydrogen bonds and presence of a buried water layer in the co-crystal-line complex of Escherichia coli trp repressor with DNA. We present results of physical and biochemical measurements that address the testable predictions of each model. We find that the DNA oligomer used for co-crystallization binds to the repressor with high affinity and specificity, and 1:1 stoichiometry, consistent with other evidence that this sequence represents the true operator target for a single repressor dimer. A proposed alternative DNA sequence binds weaker and with higher stoichiometry, consistent with a cooperative binding mode. The operator DNA in solution has a B-form helical structure in the presence and absence of repressor. Affinity of repressor for operator is altered under the conditions used for cocrystal growth.     

Repression of the E coli recA gene requires at least two LexA protein monomers

To analyze the DNA binding domain of E coli LexA repressor and to test whether the repressor binds as a dimer to DNA, negative dominant lexA mutations affecting the binding domain have been isolated. A large number of amino acid substitutions between amino acid positions 39 and 46 were introduced using cassette mutagenesis. Mutants defective in DNA binding were identified and then examined for dominance to lexA+. A number of substitutions weakened repressor function partially, whereas other substitutions led to a repressor with no demonstrable activity and a defective dominant phenotype. Since the LexA binding site has dyad symmetry, we infer that this dominance results from interaction of monomers of wild-type LexA protein with mutant monomers and that an oligomeric form of repressor binds to operator. The binding of LexA protein to operator DNA was investigated further using a mutant protein, LexA408, which recognizes a symmetrically altered operator mutant but not wild-type operator. A mixture of mutant LexA408 and LexA+ proteins, but neither individual protein, bound to a hybrid recA operator consisting of mutant and wild-type operator half sites. These results suggest that at least 1 LexA protein monomer interacts with each operator half site. We discuss the role of LexA oligomer formation in binding of LexA to operator DNA.     

Protein–nucleoside contacts in the interaction between the replication terminator protein of Bacillus subtilis and the DNA terminator

The interaction between the DNA replication terminator, IRI, of Bacillus subtilis and its cognate replication terminator protein (RTP) has been examined by the technique of missing nucleoside interference (MNI). IRI contains two adjacent binding sites (A and B) for RTP dimers. The B site is proximal to the replication fork arrest site. The present results have shown that nucleoside contacts with RTP in the two sites are very different. There are more extensive contacts of nucleosides in both strands of the B site with RTP compared with the A site. The data also strongly suggest that filling by RTP of the B site occurs first and is needed for subsequent co-operative filling of an overlapping A site. The A site alone binds RTP poorly. The findings are consistent with interaction occurring between RTP dimers bound to adjacent sites of IRI, which would explain why RTP bound to the B site alone cannot cause replication fork arrest.     

NMR assignments for the amino-terminal residues of trp repressor and their role in DNA binding

The trp repressor of Escherichia coli specifically binds to operator DNAs in three operons involved in tryptophan metabolism. The NMR spectra of repressor and a chymotryptic fragment lacking the six amino-terminal residues are compared. Two-dimensional J-correlated spectra of the two forms of the protein are superimposable except for cross-peaks that are associated with the N-terminal region. The chemical shifts and relaxation behavior of the N-terminal resonances suggest mobile "arms". Spin-echo experiments on a ternary complex of repressor with L-tryptophan and operator DNA indicate that the termini are also disordered in the complex, although removal of the arms reduces the DNA binding energy. Relaxation measurements on the armless protein show increased mobility for several residues, probably due to helix fraying in the newly exposed N-terminal region. DNA binding by the armless protein does not reduce the mobility of these residues. Thus, it appears that the arms serve to stabilize the N-terminal helix but that this structural role does not explain their contribution to the DNA binding energy. These results suggest that the promiscuous DNA binding by the arms seen in the X-ray crystal structure is found in solution as well.