Target cell contact suppresses neurite outgrowth from soma-soma paired Lymnaea neurons

Neurite extension from developing and/or regenerating neurons is terminated on contact with their specific synaptic partner cells. However, a direct relationship between the effects of target cell contact on neurite outgrowth suppression and synapse formation has not yet been demonstrated. To determine whether physical/synaptic contacts affect neurite extension from cultured cells, we utilized soma-soma synapses between the identified Lymnaea neurons. A presynaptic cell (right pedal dorsal 1, RPeD1) was paired either with its postsynaptic partner cells (visceral dorsal 4, VD4, and Visceral dorsal 2, VD2) or with a non-target cell (visceral dorsal 1, VD1), and the interactions between their neurite outgrowth patterns and synapse formation were examined. Specifically, when cultured in brain conditioned medium (CM, contains growth-promoting factors), RPeD1, VD4, and VD2 exhibited robust neurite outgrowth within 12-24 h of their isolation. Synapses, similar to those seen in vivo, developed between the neurites of these cells. RPeD1 did not, however, synapse with its non-target cell VD1, despite extensive neuritic overlap between the cells. When placed in a soma-soma configuration (somata juxtaposed against each other), appropriate synapses developed between the somata of RPeD1 and VD4 (inhibitory) and between RPeD1 and VD2 (excitatory). Interestingly, pairing RPeD1 with either of its synaptic partner (VD4 or VD2) resulted in a complete suppression of neurite outgrowth from both pre- and postsynaptic neurons, even though the cells were cultured in CM. A single cell in the same dish, however, extended elaborate neurites. Similarly, a postsynaptic cell (VD4) contact suppressed the rate of neurite extension from a previously sprouted RPeD1. This suppression of the presynaptic growth cone motility was also target cell contact specific. The neurite suppression from soma-soma paired cells was transient, and neuronal sprouting began after a delay of 48-72 h. In contrast, when paired with VD1, both RPeD1 and this non-target cell exhibited robust neurite outgrowth. We demonstrate that this neurite suppression from soma-soma paired cells was target cell contact/synapse specific and Ca(2+) dependent. Specifically, soma-soma pairing in CM containing either lower external Ca(2+) concentration (50% of its control level) or Cd(2+) resulted in robust neurite outgrowth from both cells; however, the incidence of synapse formation between the paired cells was significantly reduced. Taken together, our data show that contact (physical and/or synaptic) between synaptic partners strongly influence neurite outgrowth patterns of both pre- and postsynaptic neurons in a time-dependent and cell-specific manner. Moreover, our data also suggest that neurite outgrowth and synapse formation are differentially regulated by external Ca(2+) concentration.     

Target cell contact suppresses neurite outgrowth from soma–soma paired Lymnaea neurons

Neurite extension from developing and/or regenerating neurons is terminated on contact with their specific synaptic partner cells. However, a direct relationship between the effects of target cell contact on neurite outgrowth suppression and synapse formation has not yet been demonstrated. To determine whether physical/synaptic contacts affect neurite extension from cultured cells, we utilized soma–soma synapses between the identified Lymnaea neurons. A presynaptic cell (right pedal dorsal 1, RPeD1) was paired either with its postsynaptic partner cells (visceral dorsal 4, VD4, and Visceral dorsal 2, VD2) or with a non‐target cell (visceral dorsal 1, VD1), and the interactions between their neurite outgrowth patterns and synapse formation were examined. Specifically, when cultured in brain conditioned medium (CM, contains growth‐promoting factors), RPeD1, VD4, and VD2 exhibited robust neurite outgrowth within 12–24 h of their isolation. Synapses, similar to those seen in vivo, developed between the neurites of these cells. RPeD1 did not, however, synapse with its non–target cell VD1, despite extensive neuritic overlap between the cells. When placed in a soma–soma configuration (somata juxtaposed against each other), appropriate synapses developed between the somata of RPeD1 and VD4 (inhibitory) and between RPeD1 and VD2 (excitatory). Interestingly, pairing RPeD1 with either of its synaptic partner (VD4 or VD2) resulted in a complete suppression of neurite outgrowth from both pre‐ and postsynaptic neurons, even though the cells were cultured in CM. A single cell in the same dish, however, extended elaborate neurites. Similarly, a postsynaptic cell (VD4) contact suppressed the rate of neurite extension from a previously sprouted RPeD1. This suppression of the presynaptic growth cone motility was also target cell contact specific. The neurite suppression from soma–soma paired cells was transient, and neuronal sprouting began after a delay of 48–72 h. In contrast, when paired with VD1, both RPeD1 and this non‐target cell exhibited robust neurite outgrowth. We demonstrate that this neurite suppression from soma–soma paired cells was target cell contact/synapse specific and Ca²⁺ dependent. Specifically, soma–soma pairing in CM containing either lower external Ca²⁺ concentration (50% of its control level) or Cd²⁺ resulted in robust neurite outgrowth from both cells; however, the incidence of synapse formation between the paired cells was significantly reduced. Taken together, our data show that contact (physical and/or synaptic) between synaptic partners strongly influence neurite outgrowth patterns of both pre‐ and postsynaptic neurons in a time‐dependent and cell‐specific manner. Moreover, our data also suggest that neurite outgrowth and synapse formation are differentially regulated by external Ca²⁺ concentration. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Neurobiol 42: 357–369, 2000     

Pronase modifies synaptic transmission and activity of identifiedLymnaea neurons

Proteolytic enzymes can have significant effects on the physiological properties of neurons. Although several actions of proteolytic enzymes on the physiology of single neurons have been described, the effects of these enzymes on network properties in the central nervous system (CNS) have received less attention. The effects of bath-applied pronase (0.05%) on synaptic connections and spontaneous activity in theLymnaea CNS were examined. Brief application (i.e. 2–3 min) of pronase modified some, but not all, synapses in the CNS. For example, the chemical synapse between two interneurons, RPeD11 and RPeD1, and between the interneuron, RPeD1, and RPA motoneurons were examined. Both these synapses were either biphasic or monophasic (depolarizing) under control conditions. Pronase exposure eliminated the depolarizing phase of the RPeD11→RPeD1 synapse, but had no effect on the connection between RPeD1 and RPA neurons. In addition, the effects of pronase on electrical-coupling between two peptidergic neurons, VD1 and RPD2, in the CNS were investigated. Pronase decreased the total network input resistance and cell input resistances as well as the steady-state coupling ratio. Furthermore, exposure to pronase induced various changes (i.e. depolarization, hyperpolarization, bursting patterns and afterdischarges) in the activity pattern of different identified neurons in the CNS. Collectively, these data show that even brief exposure to a low concentration of pronase can acutely modify both synapses and neuronal activity.     

Stability and variability of synapses in the adult molluskan CNS

Synaptic transmission was examined between identified neurons in the central nervous system (CNS) of the freshwater mollusk, Lymnaea stagnalis. Four identified neurons were used: Right Pedal Dorsal one (RPeD1; a dopaminergic respiratory interneuron), Visceral Dorsal two and three (VD2/3), and Visceral Dorsal four (VD4; a cardiorespiratory interneuron). Neuron RPeD1 synapses onto both VD2/3 and VD4, while VD4 makes a reciprocal synapse onto RPeD1. When compared from animal to animal, the connections were variable in sign. Previously, we demonstrated that, in a given animal, the RPeD1 --> VD4 synapse could be either inhibitory, biphasic, or undetectable. The present study now expands this concept of variability by showing that the RPeD1 --> VD2/3 synapse was either excitatory or undetectable from animal to animal, while the synapse from VD4 to RPeD1 was observed as inhibitory, biphasic, depolarizing, excitatory, or undetectable. Next, we used 1-day organ culture to determine if the variability observed between animals is a product of ongoing change to the sign of these identified synapses and whether or not the extent of change could be influenced by the culture conditions. Changes to the sign of transmission occurred within minutes and, more commonly, after 24-h organ culture. All three synapses were investigated before and after 1-day organ culture, in either defined medium (DM) or brain-conditioned medium (CM). Regardless of culture conditions, the RPeD1 --> VD2/3 synapse showed no change of sign, i.e., it was relatively stable. However, the synapses between RPeD1 and VD4 did change sign, and when cultured in CM, the VD4 --> RPeD1 synapse changed significantly more than in DM. These data indicate that variability of some synapses reflects changes at these synapses. This is the first report that specific synapses in an adult CNS can change sign, and that the sign of transmission can be modulated by environmental conditions.     

Presynaptic depolarization rate controls transmission at an invertebrate synapse

Second-order neurons L1-3 of the locust ocellar pathway make inhibitory synapses with each other. Although the synapses transmit graded potentials, transmission depresses rapidly and completely so that a synapse only transmits when the presynaptic terminal depolarizes rapidly. The rate at which a presynaptic neuron depolarizes determines the rate at which a postsynaptic neuron hyperpolarizes, and neurotransmitter is only released during a fixed 2 ms long period. Consequently, the amplitude of a postsynaptic potential depends on the rate rather than the amplitude of a presynaptic depolarization. Following a postsynaptic potential, a synapse recovers from depression over about a second. The synapse recovers from depression even if the presynaptic terminal is held depolarized.     

Baclofen modifies via the release of monoamines the synaptic depression, frequency facilitation, and posttetanic potentiation observed at an identified cholinergic synapse of Aplysia californica

1. The mechanism of action of baclofen was studied at a cholinergic synapse of Aplysia. This synapse, called RC1-R15, can be activated by a minimal stimulation of the right pleurovisceral connective and is recorded in cell R15 of Aplysia californica. Repeated stimulation of synapse RC1-R15 produces depression, followed by frequency facilitation and by posttetanic potentiation (PTP). 2. Perfusion with baclofen (3 x 10(-5) or 5 x 10(-5) M) reduces the size of all excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) of synapse RC1-R15 produced by a train of 100 stimuli at 1.5 Hz. It also reduces the synaptic depression and PTP but increases the frequency facilitation. These effects are similar to those produced by gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), serotonin, and dopamine on this synapse. 3. When the preparation is perfused with bicuculline or picrotoxin, two antagonists of GABA, the effects of baclofen are not antagonized. However, when baclofen is perfused in the presence of SQ10,631 (an antagonist of serotonin) or butaclamol (an antagonist of dopamine), its effects are partially blocked. 4. To determine if baclofen produces its action by direct interaction with aminergic receptors or by liberating the amines from some nerve endings, a few animals were treated with reserpine to deplete the aminergic pool. Following this treatment no effects were obtained with baclofen suggesting that it acts by liberating dopamine and serotonin or some other amines. 5. In animals treated with reserpine, GABA still produces its normal effects (reduction of EPSP size, synaptic depression, posttetanic potentiation, and increase of facilitation), indicating that baclofen does not act directly on the GABA receptor located on the presynaptic terminal.     

Temperature dependence of monoamine-induced pulmonary respiration in the mollusc <Emphasis Type="Italic">Lymnaea stagnalis</Emphasis>

Pulmonary respiration (spontaneous and mediated by intracavitary administration of monoamines) has been studied in molluscs at different ambient temperatures (5, 15, and 25°C). Monoamines (dopamine, serotonin, and adrenaline) were established not to broaden the temperature diapason realization of the respiratory behavior. Microelectrode studies of the spontaneous electrical activity of the Lymnaea stagnalis respiratory network neurons (RPeD1, VD4, and Vi-cluster cells) revealed that both spontaneous and monoamine-induced respiration programs had been terminated under hypothermia conditions. The indicated effects are suggested to be due to the temperature dependence of the chemical, predominantly peptidergic, transmission of signal between neurons of the central respiratory rhythm generator in Lymnaea.     

Temperature dependence of monoamine-induced pulmonary respiration of mollusc Lymnaea stagnalis

Pulmonary respiration of molluscs (spontaneous and mediated by intracavital injection of monoamines) was studied at different environmental temperatures (5, 15, and 25 degrees C). It was established that monoamines (dopamine, serotonin, adrenalin) did not enlarge the temperature diapason, in which the respiratory behavior was realized. Microelectrode studies of spontaneous electrical activity of neurons from the respiratory network of Lymnaea stagnalis (RPeD1, VD4, cells of the Vi cluster) have shown that the respiratory program, both spontaneous and the monoamine-induced, is terminated in hypothermia. The indicated effects are suggested to be due to temperature dependence of the chemical, predominantly peptidergical, transmission of signal between neurons of the central pattern generator of respiratory pattern in Lymnaea.     

Electrical Changes in Pre- and Postsynaptic Axons of the Giant Synapse of Loligo

Potential changes both in pre- and postsynaptic axons were recorded from the giant synapse of squid with intracellular electrodes. Synaptic current was also recorded by a voltage clamp method. Facilitation of postsynaptic potential caused by applying two stimuli several milliseconds apart was accompanied by an increase in the amplitude of the presynaptic action potential. Depression of the postsynaptic potential occurred without changes in the presynaptic action potential. Increase in the concentration of Ca in sea water caused an increase in amplitude of the synaptic current. On the other hand increase in Mg concentration decreased the amplitude of the synaptic current. In these cases no appreciable change in the presynaptic action potential was observed. Extracellularly recorded potential changes of the presynaptic axon showed mainly a positive deflexion at the synaptic region and a negative deflexion in the more proximal part of the presynaptic axon. Mechanism of synaptic transmission is discussed.     

Ectopic G-protein expression in dopamine and serotonin neurons blocks cocaine sensitization in Drosophila melanogaster

Sensitization to repeated doses of psychostimulants is thought to be an important component underlying the addictive process in humans [1] [2] [3] [4]. In all vertebrate animal models, including humans [5], and even in fruit flies, sensitization is observed after repeated exposure to volatilized crack cocaine [6]. In vertebrates, sensitization is thought to be initiated by processes occurring in brain regions that contain dopamine cell bodies [2] [7]. Here, we show that modulated cell signaling in the Drosophila dopamine and serotonin neurons plays an essential role in cocaine sensitization. Targeted expression of either a stimulatory (Galpha(s)) or inhibitory (Galpha(i)) Galpha subunit, or tetanus toxin light chain (TNT) in dopamine and serotonin neurons of living flies blocked behavioral sensitization to repeated cocaine exposures. These flies showed alterations in their initial cocaine responsiveness that correlated with compensatory adaptations of postsynaptic receptor sensitivity. Finally, repeated drug stimulation of a nerve cord preparation that is postsynaptic to the brain amine cells failed to induce sensitization, further showing the importance of presynaptic modulation in sensitization.     

Neuroligins/LRRTMs prevent activity- and Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent synapse elimination in cultured neurons

Neuroligins (NLs) and leucine-rich repeat transmembrane proteins (LRRTMs) are postsynaptic cell adhesion molecules that bind to presynaptic neurexins. In this paper, we show that short hairpin ribonucleic acid-mediated knockdowns (KDs) of LRRTM1, LRRTM2, and/or NL-3, alone or together as double or triple KDs (TKDs) in cultured hippocampal neurons, did not decrease synapse numbers. In neurons cultured from NL-1 knockout mice, however, TKD of LRRTMs and NL-3 induced an ～40% loss of excitatory but not inhibitory synapses. Strikingly, synapse loss triggered by the LRRTM/NL deficiency was abrogated by chronic blockade of synaptic activity as well as by chronic inhibition of Ca(2+) influx or Ca(2+)/calmodulin (CaM) kinases. Furthermore, postsynaptic KD of CaM prevented synapse loss in a cell-autonomous manner, an effect that was reversed by CaM rescue. Our results suggest that two neurexin ligands, LRRTMs and NLs, act redundantly to maintain excitatory synapses and that synapse elimination caused by the absence of NLs and LRRTMs is promoted by synaptic activity and mediated by a postsynaptic Ca(2+)/CaM-dependent signaling pathway.     

Receptor-mediated presynaptic facilitation of quantal release of acetylcholine induced by pralidoxime inAplysia

1. Possible interactions of contrathion (pralidoxime sulfomethylate), a reactivator of phosphorylated acetylcholinesterase (AChE), with the regulation of cholinergic transmission were investigated on an identified synapse in the buccal ganglion of Aplysia californica. 2. Transmitter release was evoked either by a presynaptic action potential or, under voltage clamp, by a long depolarization of the presynaptic cell. At concentrations higher than 10(-5) M, bath-applied contrathion decreased the amplitude of miniature postsynaptic currents and increased their decay time. At the same time, the quantal release of ACh was transiently facilitated. The facilitatory effect of contrathion was prevented by tubocurarine but not by atropine. Because in this preparation, these drugs block, respectively, the presynaptic nicotinic-like and muscarinic-like receptors involved in positive and negative feedback of ACh release, we proposed that contrathion activates presynaptic nicotinic-like receptors. 3. Differential desensitization of the presynaptic receptors is proposed to explain the transience of the facilitatory action of contrathion on ACh release. 4. The complexity of the synaptic action of contrathion raises the possibility that its therapeutic effects in AChE poisonings are not limited to AChE reactivation.     

Characterization of pre- and postsynaptic dopamine receptors in Lymnaea

1. The effects of dopamine and several synthetic agonists and antagonists were studied using two identified neurons of the snail Lymnaea stagnalis. 2. In both the buccal-2 (B-2) neurons and the pedal giant (RPeD1) neuron dopamine elicited a hyperpolarizing response at least partly due to potassium efflux. RPeD1 is itself dopaminergic, implicating autoreceptors in its response to dopamine. 3. The following agents were tested: agonists--LY171555, pergolide, SKF38393, (-)-3-PPP, R(-)NPA and dopamine; antagonists--SCH23390, sulpiride, and metaclopramide. Dibutyryl cAMP was applied to determine whether the response is cAMP-mediated. 4. Results indicate that the pharmacological profiles of dopamine receptors on these neurons are inconsistent with those of either D-1, D-2 or autoreceptors in mammals.     

Cell adhesion molecules regulating astrocyte–neuron interactions

A tripartite synapse comprises a neuronal presynaptic axon and a postsynaptic dendrite, which are closely ensheathed by a perisynaptic astrocyte process. Through their structural and functional association with thousands of neuronal synapses, astrocytes regulate synapse formation and function. Recent work revealed a diverse range of cell adhesion–based mechanisms that mediate astrocyte–synapse interactions at tripartite synapses. Here, we will review some of these findings unveiling a highly dynamic bidirectional signaling between astrocytes and synapses, which orchestrates astrocyte morphological maturation and synapse development. Moreover, we will discuss the roles of these newly discovered molecular pathways in brain physiology and function both in health and disease.     

SYNAPSES IN THE CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM

A number of different synapses have been described in the medulla, cerebellar cortex, and cerebral cortex of the rat. All of these possess the same fundamental fine structure as follows: 1. Close apposition of the limiting membranes of presynaptic and postsynaptic cells without any protoplasmic continuity across the synapse. The two apposed membranes are separated by a cleft about 200 A wide, and display localized regions of thickening and increased density. 2. The presynaptic expansion of the axon, the end-foot or bouton terminal, contains a collection of mitochondria and clusters of small vesicles about 200 to 650 A in diameter. Although the significance of these structures in the physiology of the synapse is still unknown, two suggestions are made: that the mitochondria, by means of the relation between their enzymatic activity and ion transport, participate in the electrical phenomena about the synapse; and that the small synaptic vesicles provide the morphological representation of the prejunctional, subcellular units of neurohumoral discharge at the synapse demanded by physiological evidence.     

Basic principles of synaptic physiology illustrated by a computer model

A computer model is described that simulates many basic aspects of chemical synapse physiology. The model consists of two displays, the first being a pictorial diagram of the anatomical connections between two presynaptic neurons and one postsynaptic neuron. Either or both of the presynaptic cells can be stimulated from a control panel with variable control of the number of pulses and firing rate; the resulting presynaptic action potentials are animated. The second display plots the membrane potential of the postsynaptic cell versus time following presynaptic stimulation. The model accurately simulates temporal and spatial summation when the presynaptic cells are arranged and stimulated in parallel and simulates presynaptic inhibition when they are arranged and stimulated in series. Excitatory and inhibitory postsynaptic potentials can be demonstrated by altering the nature of the ionic conductance change occurring on the postsynaptic cell. The effects on summation of changing length constant or time constant of the postsynaptic cell can also be illustrated. The model is useful for teaching these concepts to medical, graduate, or undergraduate students and can also be used as a self-directed computer laboratory exercise. It is available for free download from the internet.     

Preserved morphology and physiology of excitatory synapses in profilin1-deficient mice

Profilins are important regulators of actin dynamics and have been implicated in activity-dependent morphological changes of dendritic spines and synaptic plasticity. Recently, defective presynaptic excitability and neurotransmitter release of glutamatergic synapses were described for profilin2-deficient mice. Both dendritic spine morphology and synaptic plasticity were fully preserved in these mutants, bringing forward the hypothesis that profilin1 is mainly involved in postsynaptic mechanisms, complementary to the presynaptic role of profilin2. To test the hypothesis and to elucidate the synaptic function of profilin1, we here specifically deleted profilin1 in neurons of the adult forebrain by using conditional knockout mice on a CaMKII-cre-expressing background. Analysis of Golgi-stained hippocampal pyramidal cells and electron micrographs from the CA1 stratum radiatum revealed normal synapse density, spine morphology, and synapse ultrastructure in the absence of profilin1. Moreover, electrophysiological recordings showed that basal synaptic transmission, presynaptic physiology, as well as postsynaptic plasticity were unchanged in profilin1 mutants. Hence, loss of profilin1 had no adverse effects on the morphology and function of excitatory synapses. Our data are in agreement with two different scenarios: i) profilins are not relevant for actin regulation in postsynaptic structures, activity-dependent morphological changes of dendritic spines, and synaptic plasticity or ii) profilin1 and profilin2 have overlapping functions particularly in the postsynaptic compartment. Future analysis of double mutant mice will ultimately unravel whether profilins are relevant for dendritic spine morphology and synaptic plasticity.     

Dendritic GABA release depresses excitatory transmission between layer 2/3 pyramidal and bitufted neurons in rat neocortex

GABAergic, somatostatin-containing bitufted interneurons in layer 2/3 of rat neocortex are excited via glutamatergic excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) by pyramidal neurons located in the same cortical layer. Pair recordings showed that short bursts of backpropagating dendritic action potentials (APs) reduced the amplitude of unitary EPSPs. EPSP depression was dependent on a rise in dendritic [Ca2+]. The effect was blocked by the GABA(B) receptor (GABA(B)-R) antagonist CGP55845A and was mimicked by the GABA(B)-R agonist baclofen. As presynaptic GABA(B)-Rs were activated neither by somatostatin nor by GABA released from axon collaterals of the bitufted cell, we conclude that GABA(B)-Rs were activated by a retrograde messenger, most likely GABA, released from the dendrite. Because synaptic depression was prevented by loading bitufted neurons with GDP-beta-S, it is likely to be caused by exocytotic GABA release from dendrites.     

Locomotor rhythms in the pond snail Lymnaea stagnalis: site of origin and neurotransmitter requirements

1. We have found that, in preparations of isolated CNS of the pond snail Lymnaea stagnalis, both serotonin (5HT) and dopamine (DA), as well as their respective precursors, 5HTP and DOPA, are effective in producing fictive intense (muscular) locomotion. 2. Phase-coupled to each of the above pedal rhythms are numerous identifiable pedal neurons including the respiratory interneuron RPeD1, thus suggesting interaction between networks responsible for locomotion and air breathing. 3. The novel DA/DOPA-dependent motor rhythm resembles the 5HT/5HTP-dependent one in terms of activity of identifiable pedal neurons, being however considerably slower than the latter. 4. The results of transection experiments suggest that each of the rhythms is generated by a paired CPG lying entirely within the pedal ganglia.     

Different extrinsic trophic factors regulate neurite outgrowth and synapse formation between identified Lymnaea neurons

The requirement for trophic factors in neurite outgrowth is well established, though their role in synapse formation is yet to be determined. Moreover, the issue of whether the trophic factors mediating neurite outgrowth are also responsible for synapse specification has not yet been resolved. To test whether trophic factors mediating neurite outgrowth and synapse formation between identified neurons are conserved in two molluscan species and whether these developmental processes are differentially regulated by different trophic factors, we used soma-soma and neurite-neurite synapses between identified Lymnaea neurons. We demonstrate here that the trophic factors present in Aplysia hemolymph, although sufficient to induce neurite outgrowth from Lymnaea neurons, do not promote specific synapse formation between excitatory partners. Specifically, the identified presynaptic neuron visceral dorsal 4 (VD4) and postsynaptic neuron left pedal dorsal 1 (LPeD1) were either paired in a soma-soma configuration or plated individually to allow neuritic contacts. Cells were cultured in either Lymnaea brain-conditioned medium (CM) or on poly-L-lysine dishes that were pretreated with Aplysia hemolymph (ApHM), but contained only Lymnaea defined medium (DM; does not promote neurite outgrowth). In ApHM-coated dishes containing DM, Lymnaea neurons exhibited extensive neurite outgrowth, but appropriate excitatory synapses failed to develop between the cells. Instead, inappropriate reciprocal inhibitory synapses formed between VD4 and LPeD1. Similar inappropriate inhibitory synapses were observed in Aplysia hemolymph-pretreated dishes that contained dialyzed Aplysia hemolymph. These inhibitory synapses were novel and inappropriate, because they do not exist in vivo. A receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (Lavendustin A) blocked neurite outgrowth induced by both Lymnaea CM and ApHM. However, it did not affect inappropriate inhibitory synapse formation between the neurons. These data demonstrate that neurite outgrowth but not inappropriate inhibitory synapse formation involves receptor tyrosine kinases. Together, our data provide direct evidence that trophic factors required for neurite outgrowth are conserved among two different molluscan species, and that neurite extension and synapse specification between excitatory partners are likely mediated by different trophic factors.