Improved conception in timed-artificial insemination using a progesterone-releasing intravaginal device and Ovsynch protocol in postpartum suckled Japanese Black beef cows

The primary objective was to determine the effect of supplemental progesterone, administered via an intravaginal device (CIDR), on conception rates to timed-artificial insemination (timed-AI) in postpartum suckled Japanese Black beef cows treated with the Ovsynch protocol. A secondary objective was to compare the effects of treatments on plasma concentrations of progesterone and estradiol. Cows in the control group (Ovsynch, n=38) received a standard Ovsynch protocol (100 microg GnRH analogue on Day 0, 500 microg PGF2alpha analogue on Day 7, and 100 microg GnRH analogue on Day 9), with AI on Day 10, approximately 20 h after the second GnRH treatment. Cows in the treatment group (Ovsynch+CIDR; n=40) received a standard Ovsynch protocol plus a CIDR for 7 days (starting on Day 0). Plasma progesterone concentrations were determined on Days 0, 1, 7, 9, 10, and 17 and plasma estradiol-17beta concentrations were determined on Days 7, 9, 10, and 17. The odds ratio for likelihood of conception was 3.29 times greater (P=0.02) in the Ovsynch+CIDR group compared to Ovsynch group. The conception rate was greater (P=0.03) in the Ovsynch+CIDR group than in the Ovsynch group (72.5% versus 47.7%). Insertion of a CIDR device significantly increased plasma progesterone concentrations only on Days 1 and 7 (P<0.001 and P=0.05, respectively), but had no significant effect on plasma estradiol-17beta concentrations. Including a CIDR with the Ovsynch protocol significantly improved conception rates in postpartum suckled Japanese Black beef cows.     

Comparison of synchronization of ovulation with timed insemination and exogenous progesterone as therapeutic strategies for ovarian cysts in lactating dairy cows

The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of the Ovsynch and controlled internal drug releasing (CIDR) protocols under commercial conditions for the treatment of cystic ovarian disease in dairy cattle. A total of 401 lactating dairy cows with ovarian cysts were alternatively allocated to two treatment groups on the day of diagnosis. Cows in the Ovsynch group were treated with GnRH on Day 0, PGF2alpha on Day 7, GnRH on Day 9, with timed insemination 16-20 h later. Cows in the CIDR group were treated with a CIDR insert on Day 0 for 7 days; on Day 7, the CIDR was removed, and cows were treated with PGF2alpha. All cows in the CIDR group were observed for estrus and cows exhibiting estrus within 7 days following removal of the CIDR and PGF2alpha administration were inseminated. The outcomes of interest for this experiment were the likelihood to be inseminated, return to cyclicity (determined by a CL on Day 21), conception and pregnancy rates. Data for these variables were analyzed using logistic regression. The percentage of cows inseminated in the Ovsynch and CIDR groups were 82 and 44%, respectively. Cows in the Ovsynch group were 5.8 times more likely to be inseminated than cows in the CIDR group. Cows with a low BCS were 0.48 times less likely to be inseminated than cows with a high BCS. The percentage of cows with a CL on Day 21 for the Ovsynch and CIDR groups was 83 and 79%, respectively (P > 0.05). Cows with a low BCS were 0.49 times less likely to have CL on Day 21 than cows with a high BCS. Conception and pregnancy rates for cows in the Ovsynch group were 18.3 and 14.4%, respectively. Conception and pregnancy rates for cows in the CIDR group were 23.1 and 9.5%, respectively. There was no significant differences between conception or pregnancy rates in cows in both groups. Primiparous cows were 2.6 times more likely to conceive than multiparous cows. In conclusion, the results of this study suggested that fertility was not different between cows with ovarian cysts treated with either the Ovsynch or the CIDR protocols in this dairy herd. In addition, primiparous cows had an increased likelihood for conception compared to multiparous cows, and cows with a low BCS were less likely to be inseminated or have a CL on Day 21, regardless of treatment.     

Effect of timing of prostaglandin administration, controlled internal drug release removal and gonadotropin releasing hormone administration on pregnancy rate in fixed-time AI protocols in crossbred Angus cows

Two experiments were conducted to investigate the effects of timing of prostaglandin F2(alpha) (PGF2(alpha)) administration, controlled internal drug release device (CIDR) removal and second gonodotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) administration on the pregnancy outcome in CIDR-based synchronization protocols. In Experiment 1, suckled Angus crossbred beef cows (n = 580) were given 100 microg of GnRH+a CIDR on Day 0. Cows in Group 1 (modified Ovsynch-P) received 25 mg of dinoprost (PGF2(alpha)) and CIDR device removal on Day 8 (AM), 100 microg of GnRH 36 h later on Day 9 (p.m.), and fixed-time AI (FTAI) 16 h later on Day 10 (47.5+/-1.1 h after PGF2(alpha)). Cows in Group 2 (Ovsynch-P) received 25mg of PGF2(alpha) and CIDR device removal on Day 7 (p.m.), 100 microg of GnRH 48 h later on Day 9 and FTAI 16 h later on Day 10 (66.6+/-1.2 h after PGF2(alpha)). Pregnancy rates were 56.5% (170/301) for Group 1 and 55.6% (155/279) for Group 2, respectively (P = 0.47). In Experiment 2, beef cows (n=734) were synchronized with 100 microg of GnRH+CIDR on Day 0, 25 mg of PGF2(alpha) and CIDR device removal on Day 7 and either 100 microg of GnRH 48 h later on Day 9 (Ovsynch-P) and FTAI 16 h later on Day 10 (64.9+/-3.3 h from PGF2(alpha)) or 100 microg of GnRH on Day 10 (CO-Synch-P) at the time of AI (63.2+/-4.2 h from PGF2(alpha)). Pregnancy rates were 48.8% (180/369) for Ovsynch-P and 44.7% (163/365) for CO-synch-P groups, respectively (P = 0.11). In both experiments, there was a locationxtreatment interaction (P<0.05); pregnancy rates between locations were different (P < 0.05) in the Ovsynch-P group. In conclusion, in a CIDR-based Ovsynch synchronization protocol, delaying administration of prostaglandin and CIDR removal by 12 h, or timing of the second GnRH by 16 h, did not affect pregnancy rates to FTAI. Therefore, there may be an opportunity to make changes in synchronization protocols with out adversely affecting FTAI pregnancy rates.     

Decreasing the interval between GnRH and PGF2alpha from 7 to 5 days and lengthening proestrus increases timed-AI pregnancy rates in beef cows

Four experiments were conducted in postpartum beef cows to evaluate the influence of reducing the interval from GnRH to PGF(2alpha) from 7 to 5d in a Select-Synch + CIDR or CO-Synch + CIDR estrous synchronization program. In Expt 1, cows (n=156) were treated with either a 7 or 5d Select-Synch + CIDR program. A second PGF(2alpha) treatment was given to all cows in all experiments at 12h after the initial PGF(2alpha) (to ensure that luteolysis occurred with the 5d program). Estrous response, interval to estrus, conception rate, and first service AI pregnancy rates were similar between treatments. In Expt 2, cows (n=223) were treated with either a 7 or 5d CO-Synch + CIDR program, with timed-AI concomitant with GnRH at 60 h after PGF(2alpha). Timed-AI pregnancy rates were similar between treatments. In Expt 3 (n=223) and 4 (n=400) cows were treated with either a 7 or 5d CO-Synch + CIDR program with timed-AI concurrent with GnRH at either 60 h (7d) or 72 h (5d) after CIDR withdrawal. Timed-AI pregnancy rates were 13.3% (P<0.05; Expt 3) and 9.1% (P<0.05; Expt 4) greater for the 5 than 7d program. In conclusion, timed-AI pregnancy rates were improved with a 5d CO-Synch + CIDR program with timed-AI at 72 h after CIDR withdrawal, compared to a 7d CO-Synch + CIDR program with timed-AI at 60 h after CIDR withdrawal.     

Follicular wave emergence, luteal function and synchrony of ovulation following GnRH or estradiol benzoate in a CIDR-treated, lactating Holstein cows

This study evaluated the effect of GnRH or estradiol benzoate (EB) on follicular wave emergence and progesterone concentrations, and following a second injection of GnRH, synchrony of ovulation, and pregnancy rates in a controlled internal drug release (CIDR)-based timed AI (TAI) protocol in lactating Holstein cows. Cows received a CIDR device without hormone (controls), with an injection of 100 microg GnRH or with an injection of 4 mg EB. Thereafter, all received PGF(2 alpha) at the time of CIDR removal on Day 7, GnRH on Day 9, and TAI 16 h later. Follicular wave emergence occurred within 7 days in 19/20 GnRH-treated, 14/20 EB-treated and 5/20 control cows (P < 0.05). The interval to wave emergence was the shorter and less variable (P < 0.01) in the GnRH group (2.9 +/- 0.2 days) than in the EB (4.7 +/- 0.5 days) or control (4.8 +/- 1.0 days) groups. Serum progesterone concentrations from Days 4 to 7 were higher (P < 0.01) in the GnRH-treated cows that ovulated than in those that did not ovulate, or in control and EB-treated cows. The diameters of dominant follicle on Day 7 differed among groups (P < 0.01), and the diameters of the preovulatory follicle on Day 9 were larger (P < 0.01) in the control and GnRH groups than in the EB group. The proportion of cows with synchronized ovulations did not differ among groups, but pregnancy rate to TAI was higher (P < 0.05) in the GnRH group (65%; 13/20) than in the control (30%; 6/20) or EB (35%; 7/20) groups. Results suggest that GnRH treatment of CIDR-treated lactating Holstein cows will result in synchronous follicular wave emergence, large preovulatory follicles and synchronous ovulation, resulting in an acceptable pregnancy rates to TAI.     

The use of progestins in regimens for fixed-time artificial insemination in beef cattle

Four experiments were conducted to investigate modifications to gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH)-based fixed-time Al protocols in beef cattle. In Experiment 1, the effect of reducing the interval from GnRH treatment to prostaglandin (PGF) was examined. Lactating beef cows (n = 111) were given 100 mg gonadorelin (GnRH) on Day 0 (start of treatment) and either 500 microg cloprostenol (PGF) on Day 6 with Al and 100 microg GnRH 60 h later, or PGF on Day 7 with Al and GnRH 48 h later (6- or 7-day Co-Synch regimens). Pregnancy rates were 32/61 (53.3%) versus 26/50 (52.0%), respectively (P = 0.96). In Experiment 2. cattle (n = 196) were synchronized with a 7-day Co-Synch regimen and received either no further treatment or a CIDR-B device (Days 0-7). Pregnancy rates were 32/71 (45.1%) versus 33/77 (42.9%) in cows (P < 0.8), and 9/23 (39.1 %) versus 17/25 (68.0%) in heifers (P < 0.05). In Experiment 3, 49 beef heifers were randomly assigned to receive 12.5 mg pLH on Day 0, PGF on Day 7 and 12.5 mg of pLH on Day 9 with Al 12 h later (pLH Ovsynch), or similar treatment plus a CIDR-B device from Days 0 to 7 (pLH Ovsynch + CIDR-B), or 1 mg estradiol benzoate (EB) and 100 mg progesterone on Day 0, a CIDR-B device from Days 0 to 7 (EB/ P4 + CIDR-B), PGF on Day 7 (at the time of CIDR-B removal) and 1 mg i.m. EB on Day 8 with AI on Day 9 (52 h after PGF). Pregnancy rate in the EB/P4 + CIDR-B group (75.0%) was higher (P < 0.04) than in the pLH Ovsynch group (37.5%): the pLH Ovsynch + CIDR-B group was intermediate (64.7%). In Experiment 4, 266 non-lactating cows were allocated to a 7-day Co-Synch protocol (Co-Synch), a 7-day Co-Synch plus 0.6 mg per head per day melengestrol acetate (MGA) from Days 0 to 6 inclusive (Co-Synch + MGA) or MGA (Days 0-6) plus 2 mg EB and 50 mg progesterone on Day 0. 500 microg PGF on Day 7, 1 mg EB on Day 8 and fixed-time Al 28 h later (EB/ P4 + MGA). Pregnancy rates (P < 0.25) were 44.8% (39/87: Co-Synch), 47.8% (43/90; Co-Synch + MGA), and 60.7% (54/89: EB/P4 + MGA). In conclusion, a 6- or 7-day interval from GnRH to PGF in a Co-Synch regimen resulted in similar pregnancy rates in cows. The addition of a progestin to a Co-Synch or Ovsynch regimen significantly improved pregnancy rates in heifers but not in cows. Progestin-based regimens that included EB consistently resulted in high pregnancy rates to fixed-time Al.     

Impact of estrous synchronization methods on cellular proportions in cervical mucus and serum hormone concentrations

The objective of this study was to examine cytological changes of cervical mucus following the induction of estrus with intra-vaginal drug release (CIDR) devices in dairy cows. Sixty healthy Holstein Frisian cows, averaging 80 (+/-10) days post-partum, were selected from a commercial dairy farm around Shiraz. Cows in the control group were synchronized by the Ovsynch protocol. Cows in the second group (OV+CIDR) were subjected to the same Ovsynch protocol but in addition were administered a progesterone-releasing CIDR. Cows in the third group (OV+S-CIDR) were subjected to Ovsynch procedures but received the skeleton of a CIDR device, which did not release progesterone. Cows in the fourth group (E2+CIDR) received a progesterone releasing CIDR but were injected with estradiol benzoate. Cows in group 5 (E2+S-CIDR) received a CIDR skeleton and estrodial benzoate. CIDR devices were removed from cows in groups 2-4 and all cows were injected with PGF2alpha on day -3. Blood samples and cervical mucus discharges were collected from all cows on days -10, -3, 0 and 12 relative to AI. On the day of AI, the mean+/-S.D. percentage of neutrophils was significantly higher (p<0.05) in the S-CIDR+OV and S-CIDR+E2 groups than in Ovsynch group. Comparing the percentage of neutrophils in cervical mucus of Ovsynch group (less than 1%) with that of other treatment groups on the day of AI (from 5 to 39%) revealed the influential effect of a CIDR device on the reproductive tract. Results of the current study did not reveal hormonal effects but did identify mechanical effects of CIDRs on cell percentages in cervical mucus. The hormonal effects were probably masked by mechanical effects. Therefore, we were not able to confirm hormonal effects on proportions of different cells in cervical mucus. Consequently, additional research on hormonal effects and the mechanical effects of CIDR on the uterus is required.     

Luteal activity at the onset of a timed insemination protocol affects reproductive outcome in early postpartum dairy cows

This study was designed to compare two timed insemination protocols, in which progesterone, GnRH and PGF2alpha were combined, with the Ovsynch protocol in presynchronized, early postpartum dairy cows. Reproductive performance was also evaluated according to whether cows showed high or low plasma progesterone concentration, at the onset of treatment. One hundred and six early postpartum dairy cows were presynchronized with two cloprostenol treatments given 14 days apart, and then assigned to one of the three treatment groups. Treatments for the synchronization of estrus in all three groups started 7 days after the second cloprostenol injection, which was considered Day 0 of the actual treatment regime. Cows in the control group (Ovsynch, n=30) were treated with GnRH on Day 0, PGF2alpha on Day 7, and were given a second dose of GnRH 32 h later. Cows in group PRID (n=45) were fitted with a progesterone releasing intravaginal device (PRID) for 9 days, and were given GnRH at the time of PRID insertion and PGF2alpha on Day 7. In group PRID/GnRH (n=31), cows received the same treatment as in the PRID group, but were given an additional GnRH injection 36 h after PRID removal. Cows were inseminated 16-20 h after the administration of the second GnRH dose in the Ovsynch group, and 56 h after PRID removal in the PRID and PRID/GnRH groups. Ovulation rate was determined on Day 11 postinsemination by detecting the presence of a corpus luteum in the ovaries. Lactation number, milk production, body condition at the onset of treatment and treatment regime were included as potential factors influencing ovulation and pregnancy after synchronization. Logistic regression analysis for cows with high and low progesterone concentration on treatment Day 0 revealed that none of the factors included in the models, except the interaction between progesterone and treatment regime, influenced the risk of ovulation and pregnancy significantly. In cows with high progesterone concentration at treatment onset, Ovsynch treatment resulted in a significantly improved pregnancy rate over values obtained following PRID or PRID/GnRH treatment. In cows with low progesterone concentration, PRID or PRID/GnRH treatment led to markedly increased ovulation and pregnancy rates with respect to Ovsynch treatment. These findings suggest the importance of establishing ovarian status in early postpartum dairy cows before starting a timed AI protocol, in terms of luteal activity assessed by blood progesterone.     

Progesterone (CIDR)-based timed AI protocols using GnRH, porcine LH or estradiol cypionate for dairy heifers: ovarian and endocrine responses and pregnancy rates

The overall objective was to compare the efficacy of GnRH, porcine LH (pLH) and estradiol cypionate (ECP), in a modified Ovsynch/fixed-time AI (FTAI) protocol that included a controlled internal drug [progesterone] release (CIDR) device. In Experiment 1, heifers received a CIDR on Day -10, and PGF (25mg) on Day -3. At CIDR insertion, heifers received 100 microg of GnRH (n=6), 0.5mg of ECP (n=6), 5.0mg of pLH (n=6) or 2 mL of saline (n=7); these treatments were repeated on Day -1, except for ECP, that was repeated on Day -2, concurrent with CIDR-removal. The 5.0 mg pLH was the least effective with a longer interval to ovulation than the other groups combined (102 versus 64 h; P<0.05). Overall mean LH concentrations (1.6 ng/mL) and area under the curve (AUC) did not differ among treatments, but mean peak LH concentration was lower in heifers given 5 mg of pLH compared to all other groups (4.5 versus 10.3 ng/mL; P<0.05). In Experiment 2, heifers on CIDR-based Ovsynch protocols were given 12.5mg pLH (n=6; pLH-low), 25.0 mg pLH (n=6, pLH-high), or 100 microg GnRH (n=5; control). Heifers in the pLH-high group had greater (P<0.01) plasma LH concentrations (between 12 and 20 h) than GnRH-treated heifers, but the pLH treatments did not differ (P>0.10). Area under the curve for LH (ng/32 h) was at least 50% greater (P<0.01) in pLH-treated heifers compared to GnRH-treated heifers (mean, 41.3, 56.3 and 20.3 for pLH-low, pLH-high and GnRH, respectively). Ovulation occurred in 15 of 17 heifers. Progesterone concentrations were higher on Days 9 and 14 in heifers given 25mg of pLH, suggesting enhanced CL function. In Experiment 3, 240 heifers were assigned to CIDR-based Ovsynch/FTAI protocols. The first and second hormonal treatments (with an intervening PGF treatment on Day -3) were GnRH/GnRH (100 microg), ECP/ECP (0.5 mg), pLH/pLH (12.5 mg) or GnRH/ECP, respectively; pregnancy rates were 58.7, 66.1, 45.9 and 48.3%, respectively (ECP/ECP>both pLH/pLH and GnRH/ECP; P相似文献   

A CIDR-based timed AI protocol can be effectively used for dairy cows with follicular cysts

The present study evaluated whether a controlled internal drug release (CIDR)-based timed AI (TAI) protocol could be used as an efficient tool for the treatment of ovarian follicular cysts in lactating dairy cows. In the first experiment, lactating dairy cows diagnosed with follicular cysts were randomly assigned to two treatments: (1) a single injection of GnRH at diagnosis (Day 0) and AI at estrus (AIE) within 21 days (GnRH group, n=70), or (2) insertion of a CIDR device containing progesterone and an injection of GnRH on Day 0, PGF(2alpha) injection at the time of CIDR removal on Day 7, GnRH injection on Day 9, and TAI 16h after the GnRH injection (CIDR-based TAI group, n=65). Conception rate after the CIDR-based TAI protocol (52.3%) was greater (P<0.05) than that after AIE following a single GnRH injection (26.9%). In the second experiment, lactating dairy cows diagnosed with follicular cysts (Cyst group, n=16) and cows having normal estrous cycles (CYC group, n=15) received the same treatment: a CIDR device containing progesterone and an injection of GnRH on Day 0, PGF(2alpha) injection at the time of CIDR removal on Day 7, and GnRH injection on Day 9. The proportion of cows with follicular wave emergence and the interval from treatment to follicular wave emergence did not differ (P>0.05) between groups. The mean diameters of dominant follicles on Days 4 and 7 as well as preovulatory follicles on Day 9, and the synchrony of ovulation following the second injection of GnRH did not differ (P>0.05) between groups. These data suggest that the CIDR-based TAI protocol results in an acceptable conception rate in dairy cows with follicular cysts.     

Reproductive performance of dairy cows with ovarian cysts after different GnRH and cloprostenol treatments

Cystic ovarian disease is an important cause of reproductive failure and economic loss for the dairy industry. This report describes two consecutive studies. The objective of the first was to evaluate the response of cows with ovarian cysts to two therapeutic treatments. In the second study, we compared the effectiveness of the best treatment established in Study 1 with that of the Ovsynch protocol. For Study 1, cows were considered to have an ovarian cyst if it was possible to observe a single follicular structure with a follicular antrum diameter > 25 min in the absence of a corpus luteum in three ultrasonographic examinations performed at 7 days intervals. At diagnosis (Day 0), cows were assigned to one of two treatment groups. Cows in Group GnRH/CLP (n = 31) were treated with 100 microg GnRH i.m. and 500 microg cloprostenol (CLP) i.m. on Day 14. Cows in Group GnRH-CLP/CLP(n = 32) were treated with 100 microg GnRH i.m. plus 500 microg CLP i.m. on Day 0, and 500 microg CLP i.m. on Day 14. The animals were inseminated at observed estrus and monitored weekly by ultrasonography for 4 weeks or until Al. Cows in the GnRH-CLP/CLP group showed a lower cystic persistence rate (15.6% < 45.2%; P = 0.01); a higher estrus detection rate (84.4% > 41.9%; P < 0.0001); a higher ovulation rate (75% versus 32.3%; P < 0.0001) and a higher early response rate (31% > 3%; P = 0.02) than those in the GnRH/CLP group. For the second study, 128 cows with ovarian cysts were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: cows in Group Ovsynch (n = 64) were treated with 100 microg GnRH i.m. on Day 0, 500 microg CLP on Day 7, and 100 microm GnRH i.m. 36 h later. Cows in this group were inseminated 24 h after the second GnRH dose (Ovsynch protocol). Cows in Group GnRH-CLP/CLP/GnRH (n = 64)were treated as those in the GnRH-CLP/CLP group of Study 1 but received GnRH 32 h after the second CLP treatment and were inseminated 24 h after this. A further group of cows without ovarian cysts inseminated at natural estrus served as the Group Control (n = 64). Cows in the GnRH-CLP/CLP/ GnRH group showed a lower cystic persistence rate (10.9% < 46.9%; P < 0.0001); higher ovulation rate (79.7% > 17.2%; P < 0.0001); higher return to estrus rate (34.3% > 12.5%; P < 0.01) and higher pregnancy rate (28.1% > 3.1%; P < 0.01) than those in Ovsynch; and a similar pregnancy rate (28.1% versus 35.9%) to Control cows. These findings indicate that lactating cows with ovarian cysts can be successfully synchronized and time inseminated using a protocol that combines GnRH and CLP, starting treatment by simultaneously administering both products. This protocol also allows the insemination of cows showing estrus within the first week of treatment. Ovarian cysts were less responsive when treatment was started with GnRH alone.     

Synchronization and resynchronization of inseminations in lactating dairy cows with the CIDR insert and the Ovsynch protocol

Pregnancy per artificial insemination (AI) was evaluated in dairy cows (Bos taurus) subjected to synchronization and resynchronization for timed AI (TAI). Cows (n = 718) received prostaglandin F_2α (PGF) on Days –38 and –24 (Days 39 and 53 postpartum), gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) on Day –10, PGF on Day –3, and GnRH and TAI on Day 0. Between Days –10 and –3, cows received a progesterone intravaginal insert (CIDR group) or no CIDR (Control group). Between Days 14 and 23, cows received a CIDR (Resynch CIDR group) or no CIDR (Resynch control group), GnRH on Day 23, with pregnancy diagnosis on Day 30. Cows in estrus (between Days 0 and 30) were re-inseminated at detected estrus (RIDE). Nonpregnant cows received PGF on Day 30 and GnRH and TAI on Day 33. Plasma progesterone was determined to be low or high on Days –24 and –10. Pregnancy rates were evaluated 30 and 55 d after AI. The CIDR insert included in the Presynch-Ovsynch protocol did not increase overall pregnancy per AI for first service (36.1% and 33.6% for CIDR; 34.1% and 28.8% for Control) but did decrease pregnancy loss (7.0% for CIDR and 15.6% for Control). The CIDR insert increased pregnancy per AI in cows with high progesterone at the time the CIDR insert was applied. Administration of a CIDR insert between Days 14 and 23 of the estrous cycle after first service did not increase overall pregnancy per AI to second service (24.7% and 22.7% for Resynch CIDR; 28.6% and 25.3% for Resynch control). For second service, RIDE cows had lower pregnancy rates in the Resynch CIDR group than in the Resynch control group. Cows with a CL (corpus luteum) at Day 30 had higher pregnancy rates in the Resynch CIDR group than those in the Resynch control group.     

Effect of a deslorelin implant in a timed artificial insemination protocol on follicle development, luteal function and reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows

This study examined the influence of a GnRH agonist containing either 450 or 750 microg of deslorelin in an implant form or a gonadorelin injection (control) to induce ovulation in the Ovsynch protocol on pregnancy rates (PR), embryonic loss, and ovarian function in 593 lactating Holstein cows. Cows were given two injections of PGF2alpha 14 days apart, followed 14 days later by the Ovsynch protocol, and were timed artificially inseminated (TAI) at 68 +/- 3 days postpartum. Blood samples for determination of plasma progesterone concentrations were collected at 24 and 10 days prior to and 11 days after TAI. Pregnancy was diagnosed on Day 27 and reconfirmed on Day 41 after TAI. Non-pregnant, not re-inseminated cows at Day 27 had their ovaries examined by ultrasonography, and the number and size of follicles and presence of luteal tissue were determined. Simultaneously, these cows were re-synchronized with the Ovsynch protocol. Pregnancy during the re-synchronization period was determined between 35 and 41 days after insemination. On Day 27, PR were higher for control (39.0%) and deslorelin 450 microg (DESLORELIN 450) implant (41.3%) than for those receiving the deslorelin 750 microg (DESLORELIN 750) implant (27.5%; P<0.05). Pregnancy losses tended to decrease for DESLORELIN 450 compared with control (5.0% versus 12.7%; P<0.13). Plasma progesterone concentrations did not differ significantly among treatments. Deslorelin suppressed ovarian activity and decreased PR during the re-synchronization period compared with control. The percentage of non-pregnant animals that were re-inseminated by Day 27 was less for deslorelin compared with control. In conclusion, incorporation of an implant of the GnRH agonist deslorelin to induce ovulation in the Ovsynch protocol has the potential to reduce pregnancy losses, but the response was dependent upon implant concentration. Evaluation of lower doses to minimize the negative effects on subsequent fertility is warranted.     

Effect of timing of second prostaglandin F2α administration in a 5-day, progesterone-based CO-Synch protocol on AI pregnancy rates in beef cows

The objective was to compare the timed AI pregnancy rate of Angus-cross beef cows synchronized with a 5-d CO-Synch + CIDR (a progesterone-releasing intravaginal insert) protocol and given two doses of PGF_2α (PGF), with the first dose in conjunction with CIDR withdrawal on Day 5, and the second dose given either early or late relative to the first dose. All cows (N = 1782) at 16 locations received 100 μg of GnRH + CIDR on Day 0. Cows received 25 mg of PGF concurrent with removal of the CIDR on Day 5, and were randomly allocated within locations to receive a second PGF either early (N = 881; from 0.5 to 3.9 h) or late (N = 901; from 4.5 to 8.15 h) relative to the first PGF treatment. On Day 8 (72 h after CIDR removal), all cows were inseminated and concurrently given 100 μg of GnRH. Cows were fitted with a pressure-sensitive mount detection device (Kamar) at CIDR removal. Cows were observed twice daily through Day 7 and at the time of AI on Day 8 for estrus and Kamar status (estrus - red, partial and lost Kamar versus no estrus - white Kamar) was recorded. Accounting for location, season, AI sire, cow observed in estrus or not at or before timed AI, and treatment by cows observed in estrus interaction, timed AI pregnancy rates were greater for the late (6.45 ± 0.03 h) than the early (2.25 ± 0.05 h) interval, 57.2 vs. 52.7%, respectively (P < 0.05). In conclusion, cows that received the second PGF late after the first PGF on the day of CIDR removal in a 5 d CO-Synch + CIDR synchronization protocol had significantly higher timed AI pregnancy rates than those receiving the second PGF early after the first PGF.     

Ovarian follicular wave synchronization and induction of ovulation in postpartum beef cows

An experiment was designed to evaluate a) the effect of a progesterone-estradiol combined treatment on ovarian follicular dynamics in postpartum beef cows, and b) ovulation and the subsequent luteal activity after short-term calf removal and GnRH agonist treatment. Multiparous Angus cows (25 to 40 d after calving) were assigned to the following treatments: untreated (Control, n = 9); short term calf removal (CR, n = 8); progesterone (CIDR, n = 9) and progesterone plus estradiol-17 beta (CIDR + E-17 beta, n = 9). Progesterone treatment (CIDR) lasted 8 d and the day of device insertion was considered as Day 0. Cows in the CIDR + E-17 beta group also received an i.m. injection of 5 mg of E-17 beta on Day 1. On Day 8, calves were removed for 48 h (CR, CIDR and CIDR + E-17 beta groups) and 6 h before the end of calf removal these cows also received an i.m. injection of 8 micrograms of Busereline (GnRH). Anestrus was confirmed in all cows by the absence of luteal tissue and progesterone concentrations below 1 ng ml-1 at the beginning of the experiment. Although mean (+/- SEM) interval from the beginning of the experiment (Day 0) to wave emergence did not differ (P > 0.05) among treatment groups (Control, 1.9 +/- 1.0, range -2 to 7 d; CR, 3.9 +/- 0.7, range 0 to 6 d; CIDR, 2.8 +/- 0.5, range 0 to 4 d and CIDR + E-17 beta, 4.1 +/- 0.2, range 3 to 5), the variability was less (P < 0.05) in the CIDR + E-17 beta group. The proportion of cows ovulating 24 to 48 h after GnRH administration tended (P = 0.08) to be higher in cows from CIDR + E-17 beta group (8/9) than in those of CR (5/8) or CIDR (6/9) groups, respectively and was associated with a higher proportion (P < 0.05) of CIDR + E-17 beta treated cows (9/9) that had a dominant follicle in the growing/early static phase at the time of GnRH treatment compared to the other GnRH treated groups (5/8, and 4/9 for CR and CIDR groups, respectively). Two CR cows ovulated 0-24 h after GnRH and only one Control cow ovulated the day before the time of GnRH administration. Cows pretreated with progesterone had longer (P < 0.05) luteal lifespan (CIDR, 14.5 +/- 0.7, CIDR + E-17 beta, 13.9 +/- 0.6 d) than those not treated with CIDR (Control, 5, CR, 4.0 +/- 0.4). We conclude that progesterone plus estradiol treatment results in tightly synchronized wave emergence and high GnRH-induced ovulation rate with normal luteal activity in postpartum beef cattle.     

Comparison of fertility,regular returns-to-estrus,and calving interval between Ovsynch and CO-synch + CIDR protocols in dairy cows

The main aims of the present study were to compare the pregnancy rate (PR), regular returns-to-estrus, and calving interval of a CO-Synch + controlled internal drug release (CIDR) device, commonly used to synchronize ovulations in beef cows, with the classical Ovsynch protocol in high-producing dairy cows. Holstein-Friesian cows (n = 128) from six commercial dairy herds, ≥40 days postpartum and not previously inseminated, were randomly assigned to one of two treatments. Cows submitted to Ovsynch protocol (group OS as control group; n = 66) received 10 μg of a GnRH analogue 7 days before and 48 hours after 25 mg PGF_2α, followed by artificial insemination (AI) 16 hours after the second GnRH administration. Cows submitted to CO-Synch + CIDR (1.38 g of progesterone) inserted for 7 days beginning at the first GnRH administration (group CoS + CD; n = 62) had the second administration of GnRH concurrent with AI, 64 hours after CIDR removal/PGF_2α administration. Nonpregnant cows with return-to-estrus between 18 and 24 days after first AI were reinseminated (second AI). Logistic regressions were used to analyze PR and returns-to-estrus. No effect of group or herd was observed in PR at first timed AI. However, the sum of cows pregnant at first AI and nonpregnant cows with regular returns-to-estrus and the total PR (first + second AI) were influenced by group treatment. Overall, cows of group CoS + CD (total PR = 56.5%) were 2.1 times more likely to became pregnant after AI and until first regular returns-to-estrus than cows of group OS. The calving interval was lower in group CoS + CD (425.9 ± 78.8 days; ±SD) than in group OS (475.3 ± 83.7 days). The CO-Synch + CIDR protocol was reliable to use in dairy herds and provided reproductive advantages when compared with Ovsynch protocol.     

Effects of resynchronization strategies for lactating Holstein cows on pattern of reinsemination, fertility, and economic outcome

The objectives were to evaluate the pattern of re-insemination, pregnancy outcomes to re-insemination in estrus and at fixed time, and economic outcomes of lactating Holstein cows submitted to three resynchronization protocols. Cows were enrolled in the Experiment at 32 ± 3 d after pre-enrollment Artificial Insemination (AI), 7 d before pregnancy diagnosis, and randomly assigned to three resynchronization protocols. All cows diagnosed not pregnant at 39 ± 3 d after pre-enrollment AI were submitted to the Cosynch72 (Day 0 GnRH, Day 7 prostaglandin F_2α, and Day 10 GnRH and fixed time AI). Cows assigned to the control treatment received no further treatment, cows assigned to the GGPG treatment received a GnRH injection on Day −7, and cows assigned to the CIDR treatment received a controlled internal drug release (CIDR) insert containing 1.38 g of progesterone from Days 0-7. Cows observed in estrus were re-inseminated on the same day. Pregnancy was diagnosed at 39 ± 3 and 67 ± 3 d after re-insemination. Costs of the resynchronization protocols were calculated for individual cows enrolled in the study and pregnancies generated were given a value of $275. The GGPG treatment resulted in the slowest (P ≤ 0.06) rate of re-insemination. Overall pregnancy per AI (P/AI) at 39 ± 3 (P = 0.50) and 67 ± 3 (P = 0.49) d after re-insemination were not affected by treatment. Although cost of the control protocol was (P < 0.01) the smallest, return per cow resynchronized was (P < 0.01) greater for GGPG and CIDR protocols. We concluded that presynchronizing the estrous cycle of cows with GnRH or treating cows with a CIDR insert during resynchronization altered the pattern of re-insemination and improved the economic return of resynchronized cows.     

Synchronization of estrus with PGF2 alpha administered 18 days after a progesterone treatment in lactating dairy cows

In a previous study we showed that estrus synchronization with 2 treatments of PGF2 alpha 13 d apart reduced conception rate at the synchronized estrus and that this reduction occurred mainly in cows in the early luteal phase at the second PGF2 alpha treatment. The objective of the present study was to determine the efficacy of a synchronization regimen in which PGF2 alpha was administered during the mid- to late-luteal phase to cows that had previously been synchronized with progesterone. Spring-calving cows from 6 dairy herds were used in this study. On Day -32 (Day 1 = the start of the breeding season), cows that had calved 2 or more weeks ago were randomly assigned to a synchronization (S, n = 732) or control (C, n = 731) group. Cows in Group S were treated with an intravaginal progesterone device (CIDR) for 12 d from Day -32 to Day -20, while those in Group C were left untreated. Similar percentages of cows in Group S (80.6%) and C (82.9%) had cycled by Day -7. The CIDR treatment synchronized the onset of estrus, resulting in 92.9% of cows in estrus being detected within 7 d after CIDR removal. Cows in Group S that had cycled by Day -7 were treated with PGF2 alpha (25 mg, i.m., Lutalyse) on Day -2. Cows in both groups that were anestrous on Day -7 were treated with a combination of progesterone and estradiol benzoate (EB) to induce estrus and ovulation (CIDR and a 10 mg EB capsule on Day -7, CIDR removal on Day -2, and injection of 1 mg EB 48 h after CIDR removal). The PGF2 alpha treatment synchronized the onset of estrus in 87.5% of the cows. Group S and C cows had similar conception rates to first (61.0 vs 58.3%) and second (58.4 vs 60.9%) AI; similar pregnancy rates over the AI period (82.8 vs 79.2%) and over the whole breeding season (91.9 vs 90.6%); and required a similar number of services per pregnancy to AI (1.7 vs 1.8). The interval from the start of the breeding season to conception for cows conceiving to AI or to combined AI and natural mating was shorter (P < 0.001) by 5.7 and 6.2 d, respectively, for the Group S cows. It is concluded that the treatment regimen tested in the present study achieved satisfactory estrus synchronization, had no detrimental effect on fertility at the synchronized estrus, and shortened the interval from start of the breeding season to conception.     

Persistent ovarian follicles in dairy cows: a therapeutic approach

Anestrus is common during the postpartum period in high-producing dairy cows. In a previous investigation, we were able to diagnose persistent follicles of 8 to 12 mm in anestrous cows. This report describes 2 consecutive studies. The objectives of the first were to 1) assess the association of persistent follicles with anestrus; and 2) evaluate 2 therapeutic treatments. In the second study, we compared the effectiveness of the best treatment established in Study 1 with the Ovsynch protocol. For Study 1, anestrous cows were considered to have a persistent follicle if it was possible to observe a single follicular structure > 8 mm in the absence of a corpus luteum or a cyst in 2 ultrasonographic examinations performed at an interval of 7 d. At diagnosis (Day 0), cows were assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups. Cows in Group GnRH/PGF (n=17) were treated with 100 microg GnRH i.m., and 25 mg PGF2alpha i.m. on Day 14. Cows in Group PRID (n=18) were fitted with a progesterone releasing intravaginal device (PRID, containing 1.55 g of progesterone) for 9 d and were given 100 microg GnRH i.m. at the time of PRID insertion, and 25 mg PGF2alpha i.m. on Day 7. Cows in Group Control (n=18) received no treatment. The animals were inseminated at observed estrus and were monitored weekly by ultrasonography until AI or 5 weeks from diagnosis. Blood samples were also collected on a weekly basis for progesterone determination. The mean size of persistent follicles on Day 0 was 9.4 +/- 0.04 mm. Progesterone levels were < 0.2 ng/mL during the first 35 d in 16 of 18 Control cows. Cows in the PRID group showed a lower persistent follicle rate (16.7% < 70.6% < 88.9%; P < 0.0001; PRID vs GnRH/PGF vs Control, respectively); a higher estrus detection rate (83.3% > 29.4% > 11.1%; P < 0.0001) and a higher pregnancy rate (27.8% > 5.9% > 0%; P = 0.02). For the second study, 145 cows with persistent follicles were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatment groups: cows in Group Ovsynch (n=73) were treated with 100 microg GnRH i.m. on Day 0, 25 mg PGF2alpha i.m. on Day 7, and 100 microm GnRH i.m. 32 h later. Cows in this group were inseminated 16 to 20 h after the second GnRH dose (Ovsynch protocol). Cows in Group PRID (n=72) were treated as those in the PRID group of Study 1, and were inseminated 56 h after PRID removal. Cows in the PRID group showed a higher ovulation rate (84.8% > 8.2%: P < 0.0001); a higher pregnancy rate (34.2% > 4.1%; P < 0.0001) and lower follicular persistence rate (22.2% < 63%; P < 0.0001) than those in Ovsynch. Our results indicate that persistent follicles affect cyclic ovarian function in lactating dairy cows. Cows with persistent follicles can be successfully synchronized and time inseminated using progesterone, GnRH and PGF2alpha but show a limited response to treatment with GnRH plus PGF2alpha.     

Effect of hCG vs. GnRH at the beginning of the Ovsynch on first ovulation and conception rates in cyclic lactating dairy cows

Ovulatory response to the first GnRH of Ovsynch is a very important factor for determining the outcome of a successful synchronization. The aim of the present study was to develop a protocol to increase the percentage of cows that ovulated in response to the first administration of Ovsynch. This study was designed to compare ovulation rates in response to GnRH or hCG at the beginning of Ovsynch and to evaluate the effects of this manipulation on pregnancy. Cows (n = 371) with corpus luteum (CL) and at least one follicle greater than 10 mm diameter size on either ovary were included in the study. Cows were divided into two groups. The Ovsynch protocol began with GnRH (10 μg) in the GPG group (n = 161; GnRH-7d-PGF2α-56h-GnRH-18h-AI), whereas in the HPG group, the first GnRH of the Ovsynch was replaced with 1500 IU hCG (n = 210; hCG-7d-PGF2α-56h-GnRH-18h-AI). Ovarian ultrasonography was performed at the times of GnRH or hCG and of PGF2α administration, at the time of artificial insemination (AI) and seven days after AI, to determine ovulation. Maximal follicle size at the beginning of the Ovsynch did not affect on response to the first GnRH/hCG treatment. Conception rate (31 d) was 0.6 times more likely to be higher (P < 0.001) in cows that responded to the first hormonal administration of Ovsynch than in those that did not respond (95% CI = 0.29-0.71). Conception rate was found to be different between the HPG (37.6%, 79/210) and the GPG groups (48.4%, 78/161). Thus, beginning of the Ovsynch protocol with hCG did not increase ovulation and conception rate in lactating dairy cows, suggesting that hCG is not a suitable replacement of the first GnRH of Ovsynch. However, our results do show that increasing the ovulation rate in response to the first hormonal administration of Ovsynch can have a significant effect on conception rate.