Photoperiodic modification of negative and positive feedback effects of oestradiol on LH secretion in ovariectomized goats

Ovariectomized Shiba goats carrying an oestradiol implant (4-10 pg/ml) were kept under a short-day light regimen (10L:14D; Group 1, N = 4) or a long-day regimen (16L:8D; Group 2, N = 4). Plasma LH concentrations were lower (P less than 0.05) in Group 2 than in Group 1 between Days 40 and 200, suggesting an enhanced negative feedback effect of oestradiol on LH secretion under a long-day regimen. On Days 30, 60, 100, 149 and 279, an LH surge was induced by i.v. infusion of oestradiol for 48 h; the infusion rate was gradually increased from 0.5 (0 h) to 4.1 (48 h) micrograms/h, thereby mimicking the preovulatory increase of oestradiol secretion. The duration and magnitude of the induced LH surge were indistinguishable between the groups. The latency from the onset of oestradiol infusion to the LH surge was relatively constant in Group 1, 41.1 +/- 0.9 h (mean +/- s.e.m., n = 17) but was shorter in Group 2 (19.7 +/- 3.7 h, P less than 0.05) on Day 149; less oestradiol was therefore required for induction of the LH surge (27.4 vs 89.7 micrograms, P less than 0.01), suggesting an increased sensitivity to the oestradiol positive feedback under a long-day regimen. These results might be interpreted to indicate that the hypothalamic-pituitary axis of the goat becomes hypersensitive to the positive as well as the negative feedback effect of oestradiol under long-day conditions.     

Effects of chronic treatment with a GnRH agonist on oestrous behaviour and on the secretion of LH and progesterone in the ewe

A study was carried out to investigate a novel approach to oestrus synchronization in the ewe by treatment with a gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist. Groups of ewes were initially treated on Day 2, 10 or 14 of the oestrous cycle with 10 mug GnRH analogue (D-Ser(Bu(t)) 6 des Gly GnRH ethylamide) per ewe per day for 14 days. Behavioural oestrus was inhibited during GnRH agonist treatment and recurred from 8 to 38 days after the treatment in an unsynchronized manner. Luteal activity during treatment was not impaired but reduced progesterone concentrations occurred in cycles after the treatment. The rhythm of ovarian function, generally characterized by prolonged follicular development, was impaired. During the treatment and subsequent recovery period, integrity of pituitary function was examined by measuring luteinizing hormone (LH) after GnRH agonist was injected, and after stimulation test doses of 150 ng natural GnRH were administered. During treatment there was, with time, a decline in pituitary response to the agonist which suggested that pituitary release of LH was exhausted. After the 14-day treatment the stimulation test with GnRH revealed a gradual return to normal responsiveness although this was not complete three weeks after the treatment when compared to control ewes. This lowered pituitary activity could cause the impaired ovarian function.     

Seasonal changes in pulsatile luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion in the ewe: relationship of frequency of LH pulses to day length and response to estradiol negative feedback

Seasonal changes in pulsatile luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion in ovariectomized ewes were examined over the course of 2 yr in relation to annual changes in environmental photoperiod, shifts in response to estradiol negative feedback control of LH secretion, and timing of the breeding season. Under natural environmental conditions, the frequency of LH pulses in individual ovariectomized ewes changed gradually and in close association with the annual cycle of day length. As days became shorter in late summer and autumn, LH pulse frequency increased; conversely, as day length increased in late winter and spring, frequency declined. Under artificial conditions in which ovariectomized ewes were exposed to different photoperiods, a similar inverse relationship was observed between day length and LH pulse frequency. The seasonal changes in frequency of LH pulses in ovariectomized ewes, although symmetric with the annual photoperiodic cycle, were not temporally coupled to the dramatic shifts in response to estradiol feedback inhibition of LH secretion at the transitions between breeding season and anestrus. The feedback shifts occurred abruptly and at times when LH pulse frequency in ovariectomized ewes was at, or near, the annual maximum or minimum. The tight coupling between LH pulse frequency and photoperiod leads to the conclusion that there is a photoperiodic drive to the LH pulse-generating system of the ewe. The temporal dissociation between changes in this photoperiodic drive and the seasonal shifts in response to estradiol negative feedback support the hypothesis that the neuroendocrine basis for these two phenomena is not one and the same.     

Psychosocial stress suppresses attractivity, proceptivity and pulsatile LH secretion in the ewe

Various stressors suppress pulsatile secretion of luteinizing hormone (LH) in ewes and cortisol has been shown to be a mediator of this effect under various conditions. In contrast, little is known about the impact of stress and cortisol on sexual behavior in the ewe. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that both psychosocial stress and stress-like levels of cortisol will reduce the level of attractivity, proceptivity and receptivity in addition to suppressing LH secretion in the ewe. In Experiment 1, a layered stress paradigm of psychosocial stress was used, consisting of isolation for 4 h with the addition of restraint, blindfold and noise of a barking dog (predator stress) at hourly intervals. This stress paradigm reduced LH pulse amplitude in ovariectomized ewes. In Experiment 2, ovariectomized ewes were artificially induced into estrus with progesterone and estradiol benzoate treatment and the layered stress paradigm was applied. LH was measured and sexual behavior was assessed using T-mazes and mating tests. Stress reduced pulsatile LH secretion, and also reduced attractivity and proceptivity of ewes but had no effect on receptivity. In Experiment 3, ewes artificially induced into estrus were infused with cortisol for 30 h. Cortisol elevated circulating plasma concentrations of cortisol, delayed the onset of estrus and resulted in increased circling behavior of ewes (i.e. moderate avoidance) during estrus and increased investigation and courtship from rams. There was no effect of cortisol on attractivity, proceptivity or receptivity during estrus. We conclude that psychosocial stress inhibits LH secretion, the ability of ewes to attract rams (attractivity) and the motivation of ewes to seek rams and initiate mating (proceptivity), but cortisol is unlikely to be the principal mediator of these effects.     

Changes in pulsatile secretion patterns of LH, FSH, progesterone, androstenedione and oestradiol in cows after superovulation with PMSG

Six heifers were injected i.m. with 2500 i.u. PMSG followed by 15 mg prostaglandin 48 h later. Serial blood samples were collected through a catheter in the caudal vena cava every 10 min for 8 h on Day 10 (7 h after PMSG administration), during luteal regression (7 h after prostaglandin administration) and on the day thereafter. Four normally cyclic heifers served as a control group. Concentrations of progesterone, androstenedione, oestradiol, LH, FSH, and PMSG in the vena cava samples were measured and the frequency and amplitudes of episodic pulses of all hormones were estimated except for PMSG. Ovaries were collected by ovariectomy at 50 h after onset of luteal regression to determine the number of preovulatory follicles (non-atretic follicles greater than or equal to 10 mm). Stimulation of follicular growth by administration of PMSG resulted in the following effects on the secretion of steroids and endogenous gonadotrophins. (1) There were no alterations in progesterone concentration and the amplitude and frequency of episodic pulses. Mean (+/- s.e.m.) concentrations were 54.1 +/- 5.8, 19.1 +/- 3.1 and 3.4 +/- 0.9 nmol/l on Day 10 (L), during luteal regression (LR) and on the day thereafter (F) respectively. (2) There were no alterations in the episodic secretion patterns of androstenedione. Mean concentrations were 0.20 +/- 0.02, 0.15 +/- 0.02 and 0.11 +/- 0.02 nmol/l for the L, LR and F periods respectively. (3) There was an increase in oestradiol concentration from 17.1 +/- 3.0 pmol/l during the L period to 233.7 +/- 86.4 pmol/l during the F period. Pulse amplitude was enhanced compared to corresponding periods in control animals whereas pulse frequency remained the same. The oestradiol concentration was significantly correlated with the number of preovulatory follicles (r = 0.82, P less than 0.05). (4) There was a suppression of the frequency of episodic LH pulses (/8 h) during the LR (3.2 +/- 0.7) and F (4.3 +/- 0.4) periods compared to corresponding periods in control heifers (9.5 +/- 0.9 and 7.0 +/- 1.5 respectively). The preovulatory LH peak occurred earlier in 4 of 6 treated heifers. (5) There was a suppression of FSH concentrations, pulse amplitude and frequency during the LR and F (17.4 +/- 0.9 mg/l, 4.7 +/- 0.8 microgram/l and 7.5 +/- 0.4 pulses/8 h) periods compared to the corresponding F-period values (35.6 +/- 6.2 mg/l, 9.8 +/- 1.6 micrograms/l and 9.3 +/- 0.3 pulses/8 h) in control heifers.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Steroid feedback inhibition of pulsatile secretion of gonadotropin-releasing hormone in the ewe

The long-term negative feedback effects of sustained elevations in circulating estradiol and progesterone on the pulsatile secretion of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) were evaluated in the ewe following ovariectomy during the mid-late anestrous and early breeding seasons. GnRH secretion was monitored in serial samples of hypophyseal portal blood. Steroids were administered from the time of ovariectomy by s.c. Silastic implants, which maintained plasma concentrations of estradiol and progesterone at levels resembling those that circulate during the mid-luteal phase of the estrous cycle; control ewes did not receive steroidal replacement. Analysis of hormonal pulse patterns in serial samples during 6-h periods on Days 8-10 after ovariectomy disclosed discrete, concurrent pulses of GnRH in hypothalamo-hypophyseal portal blood and LH in peripheral blood of untreated ovariectomized ewes. These pulses occurred every 97 min on the average. Treatment with either estradiol or progesterone greatly diminished or abolished detectable pulsatile secretion of GnRH and LH, infrequent pulses being evident in only 3 of 19 steroid-treated ewes. No major seasonal difference was observed in GnRH or LH pulse patterns in any group of ewes. Our findings in the ovariectomized ewe provide direct support for the conclusion that the negative-feedback effects of estradiol and progesterone on gonadotropin secretion in the ewe include an action on the brain and a consequent inhibition of pulsatile GnRH secretion.     

Induction of precocious puberty in ewe lambs by pulsatile administration of GnRH

Circhoral administration (250 ng/h, i.v.) of GnRH induced a preovulatory-like surge of LH and subsequent luteal function in 4 of 4 ewe lambs 1 month before expected date of puberty. Within 12h of the start of pulsatile delivery of GnRH, mean concentrations of immunoactive and bioactive LH increased significantly (P less than 0.05) and the LH surge occurred by 1.8 +/- 0.6 days of treatment. Mean concentrations of serum progesterone were elevated significantly (P less than 0.001) 3 days after the surge. The biopotency of LH (bioactive LH/immunoactive LH) before the GnRH-induced surge of LH did not differ from LH biopotency in ewe lambs receiving circhoral delivery of saline (0.41 +/- 0.05 and 0.46 +/- 0.04, respectively). Biopotency of LH declined markedly at the GnRH-induced LH surge (0.25 +/- 0.04), but biopotency of serum LH was significantly augmented (P less than 0.05) during the period of luteal activity (0.70 +/- 0.07). Regular oestrous cycles were observed in 3 of 4 ewe lambs after the 10-day GnRH treatment period. These results indicate that pulsatile delivery of GnRH is effective in inducing precocious puberty in ewe lambs. Increase in LH biopotency does not appear to be required in the pubertal transition to reproductive cyclicity in this species. Augmented LH biopotency may be important in support of luteal function after first ovulation.     

Changes in pulsatile LH secretion after ovariectomy in Ile-de-France ewes in two seasons

Two experiments were conducted in Ile-de-France ewes to study changes in pulsatile LH secretion in ewes ovariectomized during anoestrus or during the midluteal phase of the oestrous cycle. In Exp. 1, blood samples were taken every 20 min for 12 h the day before ovariectomy (Day 0). After ovariectomy, samples were taken every 10 min for 6 h (10 ewes per group), on Days 1, 3, 7 and 15. In Exp. 2 samples were taken every 10 min for 6 h (10 ewes per group) on Days 7, 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150 and 180 after ovariectomy. Further samples were taken (5 ewes per group) at 9 and 12 months after ovariectomy. There were significant interactions between season and day of sampling for the interval between LH pulses in both experiments. LH pulse frequency increased within 1 day of ovariectomy and the increase was more rapid during the breeding season. There were clear seasonal differences in pulse frequency in Exp. 2. Compared with ewes ovariectomized in anoestrus, pulse frequency was significantly higher for ewes ovariectomized in the breeding season, from Day 7 until Day 120. Once pulse frequency had increased in ewes about the time of the normal breeding season, pulse frequency remained high and subsequent seasonal changes were greatly reduced. Pulse amplitude increased immediately after ovariectomy to reach a maximum on Day 7 and there were no differences between season of ovariectomy in the initial changes in amplitude. In Exp. 2, changes in amplitude followed changes in pulse interval and there was a significant interaction between season and day of sampling. There were no significant effects of season on nadir LH concentrations which increased throughout the duration of the experiments. These results show that, in ovariectomized ewes, LH pulse frequency observed on a given day depends on time after ovariectomy, season at the time of sampling and on previous exposure of ewes to stimulatory effects of season. The direct effects of season on LH pulse frequency and seasonal changes in sensitivity to steroid feedback may contribute to control of the breeding season and their relative contributions to the beginning and end of the breeding season may differ.     

Effects of an opioid antagonist on pulsatile luteinizing hormone secretion in the ewe vary with changes in steroid negative feedback

In ewes during the breeding season, estradiol (E) and progesterone (P) synergistically regulate pulsatile luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion. E primarily inhibits LH pulse amplitude and P inhibits LH pulse frequency. To determine if endogenous opioid peptides (EOP) mediate these negative feedback effects, we administered the long-acting opioid antagonist WIN 44,441-3 (WIN) to intact ewes during the luteal and follicular phases of the estrous cycle and to ovariectomized ewes treated with no steroids, E, P, or E plus P. Steroid levels were maintained at levels seen during the estrous cycle by Silastic implants placed shortly after surgery. WIN increased LH pulse frequency, but not amplitude, in luteal phase ewes. In contrast, during the follicular phase, LH pulse amplitude was increased by WIN and pulse frequency was unchanged. Neither LH pulse frequency nor pulse amplitude was affected by WIN in long-term ovariectomized ewes untreated with steroids. In contrast, WIN slightly increased LH pulse frequency in short-term ovariectomized ewes. WIN also increased LH pulse frequency in ovariectomized ewes treated with P or E plus P. WIN did not affect pulse frequency but did increase LH pulse amplitude in E-treated ewes. These results support the hypothesis that EOP participate in the negative feedback effects of E and P on pulsatile LH secretion during the breeding season and that the inhibitory effects of EOP may persist for some time after ovariectomy.     

Opioid modulation of LH secretion in the ewe

Administration of opioid agonists and antagonists and measurement of resulting hormone changes were used to study the possible effects of opioids on reproductive function in the ewe. Intravenous administration of the long-acting methionine-enkephalin analogue FK33-824 (250 micrograms/h for 12 h) to 3 ewes during the follicular phase of the oestrous cycle depressed episodic LH secretion. This effect was reversed by administration of the opiate antagonist naloxone (25 mg/h) in combination with the FK33-824 treatment; in fact LH secretion was enhanced by the combined regimen. Naloxone (25 mg/h for 12 h) administered alone to 3 ewes in the follicular phase also enhanced LH secretion. In 3 animals treated with FK33-824 during the follicular phase, progesterone remained basal for 14 days after treatment, suggesting that ovulation was blocked. Jugular venous infusion of naloxone (25, 50 or 100 mg/h for 8h) into 5 ewes during the early and mid-luteal phase of the cycle resulted overall in a significant increase in mean plasma LH concentrations and LH episode frequency. To investigate whether endogenous opioids suppress LH release in seasonally anoestrous sheep, naloxone was infused intravenously into mature (25, 50 or 100 mg/h for 8 h) and yearling ewes (12 . 5, 25 or 50 mg/h for 8 h) during early, mid- and late anoestrus and plasma LH concentrations were measured. In the mature ewes, there was a trend for naloxone to increase LH values during the early anoestrous period but naloxone was without effect during mid- and late anoestrus. In the yearlings, naloxone infusion consistently increased plasma LH concentrations as a result of a significant increase in LH episode frequency. These experiments indicate that endogenous opioid peptides probably modulate gonadotrophin secretion during both the follicular and luteal phases of the oestrous cycle. However, the follicular phase of the sheep cycle is of short duration, and there may be residual effects of luteal-phase progesterone during this period. Secondly, there may be an age-dependent effect of naloxone on LH secretion during seasonal anoestrus in the ewe, with opioids playing a part in the suppression of LH in young but not in mature animals.     

Effects of breed, ovarian steroids and season on the pulsatile secretion of LH in ovariectomized ewes

The effects of season and of oestradiol and progesterone on the tonic secretion of LH were studied in ovariectomized Merino and Suffolk ewes, two breeds which differ markedly in the seasonal pattern of their reproductive activity. In the absence of exogenous steroids, the frequency of LH pulses was lower and the amplitude of the pulses was higher in anoestrus than in the breeding season for Merino and Suffolk ewes 30 days after ovariectomy. In long-term (190 days) ovariectomized ewes, this seasonal change in LH secretion was observed in Suffolk ewes only. During seasonal anoestrus, treatment of ewes with subcutaneous oestradiol-17 beta implants (3, 6 or 12 mm in length) decreased the frequency of LH pulses in a dose-dependent manner, with Suffolk ewes being far more sensitive to the inhibitory effects of oestradiol than Merino ewes. The lowest dose of oestradiol (3 mm) had no effect on the secretion of LH in Merino ewes, but reduced secretion in Suffolk ewes. Treatment of ewes with the highest dose of oestradiol (12 mm) completely abolished LH pulses in Suffolk ewes, whereas infrequent pulses remained evident in Merino ewes. During the breeding season, oestradiol alone had no effect on the pulsatile release of LH in either breed, but in combination with progesterone there was a significant reduction in LH pulse frequency. Progesterone effectively decreased LH secretion in both breeds in both seasons. It was concluded that differences between breeds in the 'depth' of anoestrus could be related to differences in the sensitivity of the hypothalamus to both negative feedback by oestradiol and the direct effects of photoperiod.     

Failure of prostaglandin F2α to affect LH secretion in the ovariectomized ewe

Prostaglandin F_2α (PGF_2α) when administered to ovariectomized ewes by intra-carotid infusion did not alter either the pattern of tonic LH secretion or the LH surge evoked by estradiol, indicating that, in the sheep, the luteolytic action of PGF_2α does not involve alteration of LH secretion by the pituitary gland.     

The Effect of oestradiol benzoate on the duration of oestrus and release of LH in ovariectomized Galway ewe lambs and adult ewes

The oestrous and LH responses by ovariectomized adult ewes (N=23) and 8-month-old ewe lambs (N=24) to i.m. injection of 10, 25, 62.5 or 156.25 μg oestradiol benzoate (ODB) were compared. The animals were primed by six daily injections of progesterone and ODB was administered 48 h after the last progesterone injection. The interval between ODB injection and onset of oestrus declined linearly (P<0.01) as the dose of ODB increased and was similar for the two age groups. The mean (±SEM) intervals to oestrus for levels of 10, 25, 62.5 and 156.25 μg ODB were 22.9±1.90, 18.0±1.33, 14.5±1.26 and 13.5±1.32 h, respectively. The duration of oestrus, determined by checking with Finnish Landrace rams at 3-h intervals, increased linearly (P<0.01) as the dose of ODB was raised and was significantly longer for ewe lambs (63.1±2.95 h) than for adult ewes (50.4±3.52 h). The overall mean (±SEM) durations of oestrus for levels of 10,25, 62.5 and 156.25 μg ODB were 16.9±5.91, 37.0±4.13, 75.2±3.94 and 97.8±4.13 h, respectively. A “pre-ovulatory” -type LH surge was observed in 32 of the 47 animals studied. The interval between injection of ODB and the beginning of the LH release declined as the dose of ODB increased (P<0.01) and was shorter (P<0.01) for ewe lambs (19.8±0.74 h) than for adult ewes (23.2±0.90 h). There was no evidence for an effect of either ewe age or dose of ODB on the maximum LH concentration observed, duration of LH discharge or total quantity of LH released. The sensitivity of the two age groups to the negative feedback effects of ODB on LH secretion was similar.     

Effects of neuromedin U on the pulsatile LH secretion in ovariectomized rats in association with feeding conditions

We examined the effects of intracerebroventricular injection of neuromedin U (NMU), at a dose that is reported to induce satiety in rats, on the pulsatile luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion in adult ovariectomized (OVX) rats under a normal feeding or a 48-h fasted condition. In OVX rats under the normal feeding condition, injection of NMU (1 nmol/3 microl) significantly decreased the mean LH concentration without affecting the frequency or amplitude of LH pulses, but under the 48-h fasted condition, it significantly decreased the mean LH concentration and the frequency of LH pulses without affecting the amplitude. The interpulse interval was significantly lengthened by NMU injection under the normal and the 48-h fasted condition, but the effect under the 48-h fasted condition was greater than under the normal feeding condition. We also confirmed that the 48-h fasted condition per se did not affect the pulsatile LH secretion in OVX rats. We suggest that NMU and fasting synergistically inhibit the pulsatile LH secretion, even though NMU has been said to act as a satiety factor.     

Progesterone blockade of the positive feedback effects of 17β oestradiol in the ewe

Ovariectomized ewes (n = 24) were treated with implants that resulted in circulating concentrations of progesterone and 17β-oestradiol similar to those seen in intact ewes in the luteal phase of an oestrous cycle. Progesterone implants were left in for 10 days, and 17β-oestradiol implants for 14 days. Twelve of these ewes received daily injections of 17β-oestradiol in oil (i.m.) at doses sufficient to cause a surge release of luteinizing hormone (LH) in the absence of progesterone. The other 12 ewes were treated daily with vehicle (oil). Following progesterone withdrawal on Day 10, each group of 12 ewes was divided into three subgroups. Ewes in each subgroup of the groups treated daily with 17β-oestradiol or vehicle, received an injection of either 17β-oestradiol (oil i.m.), gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) (saline, i.v.) or vehicle, 24 h after progesterone withdrawal. Following progesterone withdrawal, no LH surge was detected in ewes treated with vehicle. Surge secretion of LH was detected in ewes of all other groups. The data suggested that in progesterone-treated ewes, daily exposure to stimulatory doses of 17β-oestradiol did not desensitize the hypothalamic pituitary axis to the positive feedback effects of 17β-oestradiol. Daily exposure to 17β-oestradiol did not suppress pituitary responsiveness to GnRH. It was concluded that circulating concentrations of progesterone, similar to those seen during the luteal phase of an oestrous cycle in intact ewes, may prevent all necessary components of the LH surge secretory mechanism from responding to 17β-oestradiol.     

Regulated recovery of pulsatile growth hormone secretion from negative feedback: a preclinical investigation

Although stimulatory (feedforward) and inhibitory (feedback) dynamics jointly control neurohormone secretion, the factors that supervise feedback restraint are poorly understood. To parse the regulation of growth hormone (GH) escape from negative feedback, 25 healthy men and women were studied eight times each during an experimental GH feedback clamp. The clamp comprised combined bolus infusion of GH or saline and continuous stimulation by saline GH-releasing hormone (GHRH), GHRP-2, or both peptides after randomly ordered supplementation with placebo (both sexes) vs. E(2) (estrogen; women) and T (testosterone; men). Endpoints were GH pulsatility and entropy (a model-free measure of feedback quenching). Gender determined recovery of pulsatile GH secretion from negative feedback in all four secretagog regimens (0.003 ≤ P ≤ 0.017 for women>men). Peptidyl secretagog controlled the mass, number, and duration of feedback-inhibited GH secretory bursts (each, P < 0.001). E(2)/T administration potentiated both pulsatile (P = 0.006) and entropic (P < 0.001) modes of GH recovery. IGF-I positively predicted the escape of GH secretory burst number and mode (P = 0.022), whereas body mass index negatively forecast GH secretory burst number and mass (P = 0.005). The composite of gender, body mass index, E(2), IGF-I, and peptidyl secretagog strongly regulates the escape of pulsatile and entropic GH secretion from autonegative feedback. The ensemble factors identified in this preclinical investigation enlarge the dynamic model of GH control in humans.     

Effect of the introduction of rams during the anoestrous season on the pulsatile secretion of LH in ovariectomized ewes

Introduction of rams to ovariectomized ewes treated with oestradiol implants (N = 10) increased the frequency of LH pulses from 4 X 8 to 10 X 6 pulses per 12 h. This effect was reflected by increases in mean levels of LH and the basal levels upon which the pulses were superimposed. In ewes that had not been treated with oestradiol (N = 5), there was no significant increase in pulse frequency but mean and basal levels of LH increased slightly after the introduction of rams. In a second experiment, similar effects of the introduction of rams were seen in ovariectomized ewes treated with oestradiol or oestradiol + androstenedione (N = 16), but no significant effects of the rams were observed in untreated ewes (N = 8) or ewes treated only with androstenedione (N = 7). No preovulatory surges of LH were observed in the 30-h period after the introduction of rams. It was concluded that the ram stimulus probably evokes the increase in pulse frequency by inhibiting the negative feedback action of oestradiol, and that the surge normally observed in entire ewes is dependent on the ovarian response to these pulses. However, the observation of responses in some ewes not treated with oestradiol also raises the possibility that the ram stimulus can act directly on the hypothalamic neurones that control the secretion of LH, and that this effect is enhanced in the presence of oestrogen.