首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
Plasma luteinizing hormone (LH) concentrations were measured in normal (control) Corriedale X Merino (comeback) ewes and in clover-infertile comeback ewes which had grazed oestrogenic Yarloop clover (Trifolium subterraneum L. cv. Yarloop) for more than 4 years. Plasma LH concentrations were measured in samples taken at 20-min intervals for 6 h during the dioestrous stage of the oestrous cycle in the breeding season (BS) and during the anoestrous season (AS). In the control ewes during BS, transitory elevation in plasma LH concentration (pulses) occurred, reflecting secretory episodes, with a frequency of one per 5.2 h. This frequency fell to one per 16.5 h during the anoestrous season. In clover-infertile ewes, LH pulses occurred with a frequency of one per 4.5 h during BS and one per 4.9 h during AS (difference not significant). In the controls, plasma LH levels were higher (P less than 0.05) during BS (mean +/- s.d. = 1.2 +/- 0.4 ng/ml, n = 9) than in AS (0.7 +/- 0.3 ng/ml, n = 5). In the clover-infertile ewes, plasma LH levels in BS (1.3 +/- 0.6 ng/ml, n = 12) were similar to those of controls. During AS, plasma LH levels in the clover-infertile ewes (1.0 +/- 0.6 ng/ml, n = 10) remained similar to their BS levels, being significantly (P less than 0.05) higher than LH levels in the controls at this time. These studies indicate that the higher plasma concentrations of LH which have been reported in clover-infertile ewes arise from more frequent LH pulses. Furthermore, in contrast to normal ewes, average plasma LH, reflecting pulse frequency, is not reduced in AS. This supports the view that ingestion of phytooestrogens affects neural centres involved in regulating LH secretion.  相似文献   

2.
Three experiments were conducted to study changes in pulsatile secretion of LH and FSH during the breeding season or anoestrus in ovariectomized Ile-de-France ewes fed different amounts of the phyto-oestrogen coumestrol. In Exp. 1, conducted during the breeding season, ewes (3-4 per group) were fed lucerne supplying 4, 18 or 30 mg coumestrol per ewe per day for 15 days. Experiments 2 and 3 were conducted during seasonal anoestrus. In Exp. 2, ewes (4 per group) were fed lucerne supplying coumestrol concentrations ranging from 4 to 38 mg/ewe/day for 15 days. In Exp. 3, ewes (10 per group) were fed lucerne supplying 14 or 125 mg coumestrol/ewe/day for 15 days. During the breeding season, an increased concentration of coumestrol in the diet significantly decreased the amplitude of LH pulses. There were no effects on LH pulse frequency or on FSH concentrations. During seasonal anoestrus, there were no significant effects on LH pulse frequency, or amplitude and no significant effect on FSH concentration. These results show that high concentrations of coumestrol in lucerne diets would not explain seasonal variation in LH pulse frequency in ovariectomized ewes. However, lucerne diets with increased coumestrol concentrations can influence LH release during the breeding season.  相似文献   

3.
During the breeding season, five groups of three ewes were implanted at ovariectomy with 0.36, 0.5, 1.0 and 6.0 cm oestradiol implants or implants containing no steroid. Eleven days after receiving implants, blood samples were taken every 10 min for 6 h; implants were then removed. Treatments were repeated three times during each of two consecutive breeding seasons and four times during the intervening anoestrus. In ovariectomized ewes without steroid treatment, luteinizing hormone (LH) pulse frequency increased from early to mid-breeding season, decreased to a minimum at mid-anoestrus and increased to reach a maximum at the mid-point of the second breeding season, subsequently declining. LH pulse amplitude was inversely related to frequency. Basal serum LH concentrations decreased gradually from the first breeding season to reach a minimum at mid-anoestrus and gradually increased to reach a maximum at the end of the second breeding season. Mean serum LH and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) concentrations were higher at the end of the second breeding season compared with the beginning of the first breeding season. All parameters of gonadotrophin secretion were decreased much more by oestradiol during the anoestrus than during the breeding season. LH pulse frequency was decreased during anoestrus and at high oestradiol concentrations during the first breeding season. Apart from LH pulse amplitude, the decreases in all parameters of gonadotrophin secretion were less during the second compared with the first breeding season. The minimum effective dose of oestradiol required to decrease mean and basal serum concentrations of LH during anoestrus was lower than in the breeding season. The minimum effective dose of oestradiol required to decrease mean serum concentrations of FSH was lower in the first compared with the second breeding season. Oestradiol depression of LH pulse amplitude and mean serum concentrations of LH and FSH showed a dose dependency during the breeding season. During anoestrus dose dependency was seen for basal concentrations of LH and mean serum concentrations of LH and FSH. We conclude that significant chronic changes in gonadotrophin secretion occur in the ewe with time after ovariectomy. Sensitivity to oestradiol also changes, and the effects of oestradiol are not always dose dependent. We suggest that the circannual pattern of LH pulse frequency and basal LH secretion are directly linked to the circannual cycle of photoperiod.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)  相似文献   

4.
This study was designed to see if giving exogenous oestradiol, during the follicular phase of the oestrous cycle of intact ewes, during the breeding season or transition into anoestrus, would alter the occurrence, timing or magnitude of the preovulatory surge of secretion of luteinising hormone (LH) or follicle stimulating hormone (FSH). During the breeding season and the time of transition, separate groups of ewes were infused (intravenously) with either saline (30 ml h−1; n = 6) or oestradiol in saline (n = 6) for 30 h. Infusion started 12 h after removal of progestin-containing intravaginal sponges that had been in place for 12 days. The initial dose of oestradiol was 0.02 μg h−1; this was doubled every 4 h for 20 h, followed by every 5 h up to 30 h, to reach a maximum of 1.5 μg h−1. Following progestin removal during the breeding season, peak serum concentrations of oestradiol in control ewes were 10.31 ± 1.04 pg ml−1, at 49.60 ± 3.40 h after progestin removal. There was no obvious peak during transition, but at a time after progestin removal equivalent to the time of the oestradiol peak in ewes at mid breeding season, oestradiol concentrations were 6.70 ± 1.14 pg ml−1 in ewes in transition (P < 0.05). In oestradiol treated ewes, peak serum oestradiol concentrations (24.8 ± 2.1 pg ml−1) and time to peak (41.00 ± 0.05 h) did not differ between seasons (P > 0.05). During the breeding season, all six control ewes and four of six ewes given oestradiol showed oestrus with LH and FSH surges. The two ewes not showing oestrus did not respond to oestrus synchronisation and had persistently high serum concentrations of progesterone. During transition, three of six control ewes showed oestrus but only two had LH and FSH surges; all oestradiol treated ewes showed oestrus and gonadotrophin surges (P < 0.05). The timing and magnitude of LH and FSH surges did not vary with treatment or season. In blood samples collected every 12 min for 6 h, from 12 h after the start of oestradiol infusion, mean serum concentrations of LH and LH pulse frequency were lower in control ewes during transition than during mid breeding season (P < 0.05). Oestradiol treatment resulted in lower mean serum concentrations of LH in season and lower LH pulse frequency in transition (P < 0.05). We concluded that enhancing the height of the preovulatory peak in serum concentrations of oestradiol during the breeding season did not alter the timing or the magnitude of the preovulatory surge of LH and FSH secretion and that at transition into anoestrus, oestradiol can induce oestrus and the surge release of LH and FSH as effectively as during the breeding season.  相似文献   

5.
Overall, significantly more antral follicles greater than or equal to 1 mm diameter were present in Romney ewes during anoestrus than in the breeding season (anoestrus, 35 +/- 3 (mean +/- s.e.m.) follicles per ewe, 23 sheep; Day 9-10 of oestrous cycle, 24 +/- 1 follicles per ewe, 22 sheep; P less than 0.01), although the mean numbers of preovulatory-sized follicles (greater than or equal to 5 mm diam.) were similar (anoestrus, 1.3 +/- 0.2 per ewe; oestrous cycle, 1.0 +/- 0.1 per ewe). The ability of ovarian follicles to synthesize oestradiol did not differ between anoestrus and the breeding season as assessed from the levels of extant aromatase enzyme activity in granulosa cells and steroid concentrations in follicular fluid. Although the mean plasma concentration of LH did not differ between anoestrus and the luteal phase of the breeding season, the pattern of LH secretion differed markedly; on Day 9-10 of the oestrous cycle there were significantly more (P less than 0.001) high-amplitude LH peaks (i.e. greater than or equal to 1 ng/ml) in plasma and significantly fewer (P less than 0.001) low amplitude peaks (less than 1 ng/ml) than in anoestrous ewes. Moreover, the mean concentrations of FSH and prolactin were significantly lower during the luteal phase of the cycle than during anoestrus (FSH, P less than 0.05, prolactin, P less than 0.001). It is concluded that, in Romney ewes, the levels of antral follicular activity change throughout the year in synchrony with the circannual patterns of prolactin and day-length. Also, these data support the notion that anovulation during seasonal anoestrus is due to a reduced frequency of high-amplitude LH discharges from the pituitary gland.  相似文献   

6.
The effects of season and of oestradiol and progesterone on the tonic secretion of LH were studied in ovariectomized Merino and Suffolk ewes, two breeds which differ markedly in the seasonal pattern of their reproductive activity. In the absence of exogenous steroids, the frequency of LH pulses was lower and the amplitude of the pulses was higher in anoestrus than in the breeding season for Merino and Suffolk ewes 30 days after ovariectomy. In long-term (190 days) ovariectomized ewes, this seasonal change in LH secretion was observed in Suffolk ewes only. During seasonal anoestrus, treatment of ewes with subcutaneous oestradiol-17 beta implants (3, 6 or 12 mm in length) decreased the frequency of LH pulses in a dose-dependent manner, with Suffolk ewes being far more sensitive to the inhibitory effects of oestradiol than Merino ewes. The lowest dose of oestradiol (3 mm) had no effect on the secretion of LH in Merino ewes, but reduced secretion in Suffolk ewes. Treatment of ewes with the highest dose of oestradiol (12 mm) completely abolished LH pulses in Suffolk ewes, whereas infrequent pulses remained evident in Merino ewes. During the breeding season, oestradiol alone had no effect on the pulsatile release of LH in either breed, but in combination with progesterone there was a significant reduction in LH pulse frequency. Progesterone effectively decreased LH secretion in both breeds in both seasons. It was concluded that differences between breeds in the 'depth' of anoestrus could be related to differences in the sensitivity of the hypothalamus to both negative feedback by oestradiol and the direct effects of photoperiod.  相似文献   

7.
Daily transrectal ultrasonography of ovaries was done in seven Finn ewes during three 17-day periods from May to July. Blood samples were collected each day for estimation of the serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), oestradiol and progesterone concentrations, and also every 15 min for 6 h, halfway through each period of ultrasonographic examination, to determine the patterns of gonadotropic hormone secretion. Four ewes ceased cycling from March to mid-April (ewes entering anoestrus early) and three in May (ewes entering anoestrus late). In all ewes cyclicity resumed during the period from mid-August to mid-September. The growth of ovarian antral follicles to periovulatory sizes of >/=5 mm in diameter was seen at all stages of anoestrus. An average of four waves of follicular development (follicles growing from 3 to >/=5 mm in diameter before regression) with a periodicity of 4 days were recorded during each of the three scanning periods. There was a close temporal relationship between days of follicular wave emergence and peaks of successive FSH fluctuations. Ewes entering anoestrus late exceeded ewes that became anoestrus early in numbers of large (>/=5 mm in diameter) ovarian antral follicles and maximum follicle diameter. Peak concentrations of transient FSH increases were higher (P<0.05) in ewes entering anoestrus late than in ewes entering anoestrus early. The secretion of luteinising hormone, (LH; mean and basal level, and LH pulse frequency, but not amplitude) was lowest during the month of June in all ewes. Oestradiol production was markedly suppressed throughout anoestrus. Peaks of progesterone secretion appeared to occur at regular intervals and were associated with the end of the growth phase of the largest follicles of sequential waves. In conclusion, the growth of ovarian follicles to ostensibly ovulatory diameters is maintained throughout anoestrus in Finn ewes and periodic emergence of follicular waves is correlated with an endogenous rhythm of FSH secretion. The present study also provides evidence for the inverse relationship between the time of the onset of seasonal anoestrus and the number and size of antral follicles developing throughout anoestrus in Finn ewes, and indicates that differences exist in both the secretion of and ovarian responsiveness to gonadotropic hormones among early and late anoestrous ewes.  相似文献   

8.
Ile-de-France ewes were ovariectomized during anoestrus or the mid-luteal phase of an oestrous cycle (day of ovariectomy = Day 0). In a short-term study, FSH concentrations were measured in blood samples collected hourly the day before and on Days 1, 3, 7 and 15 after ovariectomy (10 ewes per group). FSH concentrations increased significantly from 6.1 to 16.5 ng/ml within 1 day of ovariectomy and increased further to 47.1 ng/ml by Day 15. Differences between seasons of ovariectomy were not significant. In a long-term study, FSH concentrations were measured in blood samples collected hourly on Days 7, 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150 and 180 after ovariectomy in anoestrus or the breeding season (10 ewes per group). Further samples were taken (5 ewes/group) at 240 and 365 days after ovariectomy. The pattern of change in FSH after ovariectomy differed between the two seasons and the interaction between season and sampling day was significant. For ewes ovariectomized during anoestrus, FSH concentrations increased to a maximum by Day 180 and remained high thereafter. In contrast FSH increased more slowly in ewes ovariectomized in the breeding season and differences between the groups were significant from Day 90 to Day 270. However, both groups had similar FSH concentrations at Day 365. These results show that FSH concentrations increase rapidly after ovariectomy. There are seasonal differences in FSH concentrations in the absence of ovarian feedback with increases in FSH concentration around the time of the onset of the breeding season. Once FSH concentrations had reached a maximum, major seasonal changes were no longer apparent.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)  相似文献   

9.
The initial aim of the present study was to test whether the stress of transport suppresses LH pulsatile secretion in ewes. In a pilot experiment in the late breeding season, transport resulted in an unexpected response in three out of five transported, ovariectomized ewes pretreated with oestradiol and progesterone. Before transport, seasonal suppression of LH pulses had occurred earlier than anticipated, but LH pulsatility suddenly restarted for the period of transport. This finding was reminiscent of unexplained results obtained in ovariectomized ewes infused centrally with high doses of corticotrophin-releasing hormone after pretreatment with low doses of oestradiol with or without progesterone. Hence, an additional aim of the present study was to examine whether these latter results with corticotrophin-releasing hormone could be reproduced by increasing endogenous corticotrophin-releasing hormone secretion by transport. Subsequent experiments used groups of at least eight ovariectomized ewes at different times of the year with or without prior exposure to steroids to assess whether these unexpected observations were associated with season or the prevailing endocrine milieu. In the mid-breeding season, transport for 4 h in the absence of steroid pretreatment for 8 months reduced LH pulse frequency from 7.5 +/- 0.3 to 6.3 +/- 0.4 pulses per 4 h (P < 0.05) and LH pulse amplitude from 2.6 +/- 0.5 to 1.8 +/- 0.3 ng ml-1 (P < 0.05). Similarly, in the mid-breeding season, 34 h after the cessation of pretreatment with oestradiol and progesterone, transport suppressed LH pulse frequency from 6.1 +/- 0.4 to 5.5 +/- 0.3 pulses per 4 h (P < 0.05) with a tendency of effect on amplitude (6.2 +/- 2.7 to 2.61 +/- 0.6 ng ml-1; P = 0.07; note the large variance in the pretransport data). During mid-anoestrus, evidence of a suppressive effect of transport was only observed on LH pulse amplitude (4.7 +/- 0.6 versus 3.0 +/- 0.5 pulses per 4 h; P < 0.05) in ovariectomized ewes that had not been exposed to ovarian steroids for 4 months. Repetition of the pilot experiment with 12 ewes during the transition into anoestrus resulted in one ewe with LH pulses seasonally suppressed but increased by transport; 11 ewes had a distinct pulsatile LH pattern which was decreased by transport in six ewes. In anoestrus, there was no effect of transport on LH pulse frequency or amplitude in intact ewes, or those ovariectomized 2-3 weeks previously, with or without prior oestradiol and progesterone treatment. However, basal concentrations of cortisol were greater in anoestrus than in the breeding season, and the increment in cortisol during transport was similar in anoestrus and the breeding season but greater during the transition into anoestrus (P < 0.05). Progesterone concentrations increased from 0.31 +/- 0.02 ng ml-1 before transport to 0.48 +/- 0.05 ng ml-1 during the second hour of transport (P < 0.05). In conclusion, transport reduced LH pulse frequency and amplitude in ovariectomized ewes that had not been exposed to exogenous steroids for at least 4 months. In most animals, the previously observed increase in LH pulsatility induced by exogenous CRH was not reproduced by increasing endogenous CRH secretion by transport. However, in four ewes, transport did increase LH pulsatility, but only during the transition into anoestrus in ewes with seasonally suppressed LH profiles after withdrawal of steroid pretreatment.  相似文献   

10.
Experiments were carried out to test the hypothesis that inhibin and oestradiol act synergistically to inhibit the secretion of FSH, to test for effects of progesterone, and to compare the FSH and LH responses to ovarian feedback. In Exp. 1, with 11 ovariectomized and 12 intact Romanov ewes during the anoestrous season, doses of oestradiol (administered by means of subcutaneous implants) that restored normal LH pulse frequencies were insufficient to restore normal concentrations of FSH. In Exp. 2, with 48 ovariectomized Welsh Mountain ewes during the breeding season, a factorial design with 4 ewes per cell was used to assess the responses in LH and FSH to 3 doses of oestradiol (s.c. implants) and 4 doses of bovine follicular fluid ('inhibin', 0.2-1.6 ml s.c. every 8 h). This was done initially in the absence of progesterone and then after 7 days of treatment with progesterone (s.c. implants). Analysis of variance revealed a significant synergistic interaction between oestradiol and inhibin on the plasma concentrations of FSH. Progesterone had little effect. In contrast, there was a significant synergistic interaction between oestradiol and progesterone on the concentrations of LH. 'Inhibin' also inhibited LH secretion but this effect was independent of the two steroids. We conclude that there are basic differences in the way that ovarian feedback acts to control the secretion of LH and FSH in the ewe. FSH secretion appears to be primarily controlled by the synergistic action of oestradiol and inhibin on the anterior pituitary gland, while the secretion of LH is inhibited during the follicular phase by an effect of oestrogen at pituitary level and during the luteal phase by the synergistic action of oestradiol and progesterone at the hypothalamic level. Inhibin, or another non-steroidal factor in follicular fluid, may also play a minor role in the control of LH secretion.  相似文献   

11.
To characterize the changes in LH pulse frequency during the transition to breeding season. LH pulse patterns and serum progesterone profiles were determined in 8 intact ewes from mid-anoestrus to the early breeding season. Overall, 8 increases in LH pulse frequency were observed and these were restricted to 5 ewes. Of the 8 increases, 7 occurred during the 4 weeks before the first cycle, 5 of them within 1 week after a pulse frequency typical of anoestrus (0-2 per 8 h). Six of them occurred less than 1 week before either a full-length luteal phase (n = 2) or a 1-3-day increment in progesterone (n = 4). Seven of these brief progesterone increases were observed in 6 ewes, 5 of them immediately preceding the first full-length luteal phase. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that the seasonal decrease in response to oestradiol negative feedback at the beginning of the breeding season causes an increase in GnRH, and thereby LH pulse frequency. In addition, they demonstrate that the first increase in tonic LH secretion occurs in less than 1 week and, in most ewes, initiates either the first full-length cycle or a transient increase in progesterone, the latter occurring more often.  相似文献   

12.
Two experiments were conducted in Ile-de-France ewes to study changes in pulsatile LH secretion in ewes ovariectomized during anoestrus or during the midluteal phase of the oestrous cycle. In Exp. 1, blood samples were taken every 20 min for 12 h the day before ovariectomy (Day 0). After ovariectomy, samples were taken every 10 min for 6 h (10 ewes per group), on Days 1, 3, 7 and 15. In Exp. 2 samples were taken every 10 min for 6 h (10 ewes per group) on Days 7, 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150 and 180 after ovariectomy. Further samples were taken (5 ewes per group) at 9 and 12 months after ovariectomy. There were significant interactions between season and day of sampling for the interval between LH pulses in both experiments. LH pulse frequency increased within 1 day of ovariectomy and the increase was more rapid during the breeding season. There were clear seasonal differences in pulse frequency in Exp. 2. Compared with ewes ovariectomized in anoestrus, pulse frequency was significantly higher for ewes ovariectomized in the breeding season, from Day 7 until Day 120. Once pulse frequency had increased in ewes about the time of the normal breeding season, pulse frequency remained high and subsequent seasonal changes were greatly reduced. Pulse amplitude increased immediately after ovariectomy to reach a maximum on Day 7 and there were no differences between season of ovariectomy in the initial changes in amplitude. In Exp. 2, changes in amplitude followed changes in pulse interval and there was a significant interaction between season and day of sampling. There were no significant effects of season on nadir LH concentrations which increased throughout the duration of the experiments. These results show that, in ovariectomized ewes, LH pulse frequency observed on a given day depends on time after ovariectomy, season at the time of sampling and on previous exposure of ewes to stimulatory effects of season. The direct effects of season on LH pulse frequency and seasonal changes in sensitivity to steroid feedback may contribute to control of the breeding season and their relative contributions to the beginning and end of the breeding season may differ.  相似文献   

13.
The objectives of this study were to determine whether activation of estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1; also known as ERalpha), or estrogen receptor 2 (ESR2; also known as ERbeta), or both are required to: 1) acutely inhibit secretion of LH, 2) induce the preovulatory-like surge of LH, and 3) inhibit secretion of FSH in ovariectomized (OVX) ewes. OVX ewes (n = 6) were administered intramuscularly 25 micrograms estradiol (E2), 12 mg propylpyrazoletriol (PPT; a subtype-selective ESR1 agonist), 21 mg diaprylpropionitrile (DPN; a subtype-selective ESR2 agonist), or PPT + DPN. Like E2, administration of PPT, DPN, or combination of the two rapidly decreased (P < 0.05) secretion of LH. Each agonist induced a gradual, prolonged rise in secretion of LH after the initial inhibition, but neither agonist alone nor the combined agonists was able to induce a "normal" preovulatory-like surge of LH similar to that induced by E2. Compared with E2-treated ewes, the beginning of the increase in secretion of LH occurred earlier (P < 0.01) in DPN-treated ewes, later (P < 0.05) in PPT-treated ewes, and at a similar interval in ewes receiving the combined agonist treatment. Like E2, PPT decreased (P < 0.05) secretion of FSH, but the duration of suppression was much longer in PPT-treated ewes. DPN did not alter secretion of FSH in this study. Modulation of the number of GnRH receptors by PPT and DPN was examined in primary cultures of ovine pituitary cells. In our hands, both PPT and DPN increased the number of GnRH receptors, but the dose of DPN required to stimulate synthesis of GnRH receptors was 10 times higher than that of PPT. We conclude that in OVX ewes: 1) ESR1 and ESR2 mediate the negative feedback of E2 on secretion of LH at the level of the pituitary gland, 2) ESR1 and ESR2 do not synergize or antagonize the effects of each other; however, they do interact to synchronize the beginning of the stimulatory effect of E2 on secretion of LH, 3) ESR1 and ESR2 may mediate at least partially the positive feedback of E2 on LH secretion by increasing the number of GnRH receptors, and 4) only ESR1 appears to be involved in the negative feedback of E2 on secretion of FSH.  相似文献   

14.
This study was conducted to find out whether daily LH secretion in ewes may be modulated by melatonin during the breeding season, when the secretion of both hormones is raised. Patterns of plasma LH were determined in luteal-phase ewes infused intracerebroventricularly (icv.) with Ringer-Locke solution (control) and with melatonin (100 microg/100 microl/h). Response in LH secretion to melatonin was also defined in ovariectomized (OVX) ewes without and after estradiol treatment (OVX+E2). Basal LH concentrations by themselves did not differ significantly before, during and after both control and melatonin infusions in intact, luteal-phase ewes. However, single significant (P<0.05) increases in LH concentration were noted during the early dark phase in the control and 1h after start of infusion in melatonin treated ewes. In both OVX and OVX+E2 ewes, melatonin decreased significantly (P<0.01, P<0.05, respectively) mean plasma LH concentrations as compared to the levels noted before the infusions. In OVX+E2 ewes, a single significant (P<0.05) increase in LH occurred 1h after start of melatonin treatment, similarly as in luteal-phase ewes. No significant differences in the frequencies of LH pulses before, during and after melatonin infusion were found in all treatments groups. In conclusion, melatonin may exert a modulatory effect on daily LH secretion in ewes during the breeding season, stimulating the release of this gonadotropin in the presence of estradiol feedback and inhibiting it during steroid deprivation. Thus, estradiol seems to be positively linked with the action of melatonin on reproductive activity in ewes.  相似文献   

15.
In ewes during the breeding season, estradiol (E) and progesterone (P) synergistically regulate pulsatile luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion. E primarily inhibits LH pulse amplitude and P inhibits LH pulse frequency. To determine if endogenous opioid peptides (EOP) mediate these negative feedback effects, we administered the long-acting opioid antagonist WIN 44,441-3 (WIN) to intact ewes during the luteal and follicular phases of the estrous cycle and to ovariectomized ewes treated with no steroids, E, P, or E plus P. Steroid levels were maintained at levels seen during the estrous cycle by Silastic implants placed shortly after surgery. WIN increased LH pulse frequency, but not amplitude, in luteal phase ewes. In contrast, during the follicular phase, LH pulse amplitude was increased by WIN and pulse frequency was unchanged. Neither LH pulse frequency nor pulse amplitude was affected by WIN in long-term ovariectomized ewes untreated with steroids. In contrast, WIN slightly increased LH pulse frequency in short-term ovariectomized ewes. WIN also increased LH pulse frequency in ovariectomized ewes treated with P or E plus P. WIN did not affect pulse frequency but did increase LH pulse amplitude in E-treated ewes. These results support the hypothesis that EOP participate in the negative feedback effects of E and P on pulsatile LH secretion during the breeding season and that the inhibitory effects of EOP may persist for some time after ovariectomy.  相似文献   

16.
Active immunization of 6 Damline ewes against LHRH during seasonal anoestrus resulted in an inhibition of ovarian cyclicity throughout 2 subsequent breeding seasons. This was associated with a significant suppression of plasma LH and FSH concentrations but no significant effect on prolactin. The ovaries of LHRH-immunized ewes 30 months after primary immunization contained no follicles greater than 2.5 mm in diameter and a greater proportion of follicles between 1 and 2 mm were atretic than in control ewes (N = 8). In-vitro production of testosterone and androstenedione were similar in follicles 1-2 mm in both control and LHRH-immunized ewes (N = 6) and all had little or no ability to secrete oestradiol. However, basal and hCG-stimulated progesterone secretion was suppressed in the follicles from LHRH-immunized ewes. These results show that follicular development beyond 2.5 mm in the ewe is dependent on adequate stimulation by both LH and FSH.  相似文献   

17.
In the brown hare, fertile mating takes place from the beginning of December to September. Seasonal variations of basal concentrations of LH and FSH, and pituitary response to a monthly i.v. injection of LHRH were studied in intact control females and in females ovariectomized during the seasonal anoestrus (OVX1) or during the breeding season (OVX2). In intact females, both basal and LHRH-stimulated LH levels showed an annual variation, with minimal values during anoestrus. During the breeding season, the LH response to LHRH exhibited a biphasic pattern. In contrast, there was no clear seasonal variation in basal and LHRH-stimulated FSH concentrations. After ovariectomy during anoestrus, basal LH remained low for 2 months and began to increase in December. After ovariectomy during the breeding season, LH basal concentrations increased within a few days after the operation. Thereafter, LH values remained high in both groups of females until September, and decreased significantly as in intact females. The pattern of LH release after LHRH remained monophasic in the two groups of ovariectomized females. In OVX1 females, the LH response increased as early as October, was maximum from December to April and decreased progressively until October. IN OVX2 females, the LH response decreased regularly after ovariectomy to a minimum in October. In the 2 groups of ovariectomized females, basal FSH concentrations and pituitary response to LHRH rose rapidly after ovariectomy and did not vary significantly thereafter. These results showed a direct central effect of season on the regulation of basal concentrations of LH, modulated by a negative feed-back of ovarian secretions during the breeding season. In intact hares, the enhanced LH response after LHRH during the breeding season was related to an acute positive effect of ovarian secretions. The regulation of FSH was less dependent on season and remained under a negative control of the ovary throughout the year.  相似文献   

18.
Ovarian function in ewes at the onset of the breeding season   总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2  
Transrectal ultrasonography of ovaries was performed each day, during the expected transition from anoestrus to the breeding season (mid-August to early October), in six Western white-faced cross-bred ewes, to record ovarian antral follicles > or = 3 mm in size and luteal structures. Jugular blood samples were collected daily for radioimmunoassay (RIA) of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), oestradiol and progesterone. The first ovulation of the breeding season was followed by the full-length oestrous cycle in all ewes studied. Prior to the ovulation, all ewes exhibited a distinct increase in circulating concentrations of progesterone, yet no corpora lutea (CL) were detected and luteinized unovulated follicles were detected in only three ewes. Secretion of FSH was not affected by the cessation of anoestrus and peaks of episodic FSH fluctuations were associated with the emergence of ovarian follicular waves (follicles growing from 3 to > or = 5 mm). During the 17 days prior to the first ovulation of the breeding season, there were no apparent changes in the pattern of emergence of follicular waves. Mean daily numbers of small antral follicles (not growing beyond 3 mm in diameter) declined (P < 0.05) after the first ovulation. The ovulation rate, maximal total and mean luteal volumes and maximal serum progesterone concentrations, but not mean diameters of ovulatory follicles, were ostensibly lower during the first oestrous cycle of the breeding season compared with the mid-breeding season of Western white-faced ewes. Oestradiol secretion by ovarian follicles appeared to be fully restored, compared with anoestrous ewes, but it was not synchronized with the growth of the largest antral follicles of waves until after the beginning of the first oestrous cycle. An increase in progesterone secretion preceding the first ovulation of the breeding season does not result, as previously suggested, from the ovulation of immature ovarian follicles and short-lived CL, but progesterone may be produced by luteinized unovulated follicles and/or interstitial tissue of unknown origin. This increase in serum concentrations of progesterone does not alter the pattern of follicular wave development, hence it seems to be important mainly for inducing oestrous behaviour, synchronizing it with the preovulatory surge of luteinizing hormone (LH), and preventing premature luteolysis during the ensuing luteal phase. Progesterone may also enhance ovarian follicular responsiveness to circulating gonadotropins through a local mechanism.  相似文献   

19.
The mean plasma concentrations of FSH and LH were significantly higher in FF ewes than in ++ ewes with those F+ animals being consistently in between. These gene-specific differences were found during anoestrus, the luteal phase and during a cloprostenol-induced follicular phase, suggesting that the ovaries of ewes with the F-gene are more often exposed to elevated concentrations of FSH and LH than are the ovaries of ewes without the gene. The gene-specific differences in LH secretion arose because the mean LH amplitudes were 2-3 times greater in FF compared to ++ ewes with the LH amplitudes for F+ ewes being in between. The LH pulse frequencies were similar. In these studies the pulsatile nature of FSH secretion was not defined. The pituitary contents of LH during the luteal phase, were similar in all genotypes whereas for FSH they were significantly higher in the F-gene carriers compared to ++ ewes. The pituitary sensitivity to exogenous GnRH (0.1, 0.5 and 25 micrograms i.v.) was related to genotype. Overall the LH responses to GnRH were lower in FF ewes than in ++ ewes with the results for the F+ ewes being in between. The FSH responses to all GnRH doses in the FF genotype were minimal (i.e. less than 2-fold). In the other genotypes a greater than 2-fold response was noted only at the highest GnRH dose (i.e. 25 micrograms). Treatment of FF and F+ but not ++ ewes with GnRH eventually led to a reduced FSH output, suggesting that the pituitary responses to endogenous GnRH were being down-regulated in the F-gene carriers whereas this was not the case in the non-carriers. Collectively these data confirm that peripheral plasma and the pituitary together with the ovary are compartments in which F-gene differences can be observed. In conclusion, these findings raise the possibility that F-gene-specific differences may also extend to the hypothalamus and/or other regions of the brain.  相似文献   

20.
Jugular vein blood was collected daily from four mature ewes throughout anoestrus and the first oestrous cycle of the breeding season until 4 days after the second oestrus. The levels of oestrogen, progesterone and LH were determined by radioimmunoassay. There were fluctuations in the LH level throughout most of the observed anoestrous period with a mean plus or minus S.E. value of 2-3 plus or minus 0-9 ng/ml. High LH values of 20-0, 41-2 and 137-5 ng/ml were observed in three ewes on Day - 24 of anoestrus. A brief minor rise in progesterone level was also observed around this period. Progesterone levels were consistently low (0.11 plus or minus 0-01 ng/ml) before Day - 25 of anoestrus. A major rise occurred on Day - 12 of anoestrous and this was followed by patterns similar to those that have been previously reported for the oestrous cycle of the ewe. Random fluctuations of oestrogens deviating from a mean level of 4-40 plus or minus 0-1 pg/ml were observed during anoestrus and the mean level during the period from the first to the second oestrus was 5-2 plus or minus 0-3 pg/ml. A well-defined peak of 13-3 plus or minus 0-7 pg/ml was seen in all ewes on the day of the second oestrus. Results of the present study suggest that episodic releases of LH occur during anoestrus and periods of low luteal activity. The fluctuations in LH levels, as observed during the period of low luteal activity, i.e. before Day - 25 of anoestrus, were less pronounced during the periods of high luteal activity. The view that luteal activity precedes the first behavioural oestrus of the breeding season is supported.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号