Role of ribosomal protein L27 in peptidyl transfer

The current view of ribosomal peptidyl transfer is that the ribosome is a ribozyme and that ribosomal proteins are not involved in catalysis of the chemical reaction. This view is largely based on the first crystal structures of bacterial large ribosomal subunits that did not show any protein components near the peptidyl transferase center (PTC). Recent crystallographic data on the full 70S ribosome from Thermus thermophilus, however, show that ribosomal protein L27 extends with its N-terminus into the PTC in accordance with independent biochemical data, thus raising the question of whether the ribozyme picture is strictly valid. We have carried out extensive computer simulations of the peptidyl transfer reaction in the T. thermophilus ribosome to address the role of L27. The results show a reaction rate similar to that obtained in earlier simulations of the Haloarcula marismortui reaction. Furthermore, deletion of L27 is predicted to only give a minor rate reduction, in agreement with biochemical data, suggesting that the ribozyme view is indeed valid. The N-terminus of L27 is predicted to interact with the A76 phosphate group of the A-site tRNA, thereby explaining the observed impairment of A-site substrate binding for ribosomes lacking L27. Simulations are also reported for the reaction with puromycin, an A-site tRNA analogue which lacks the A76 phosphate group. The calculated energetics shows that this substrate can cause a downward p K a shift of L27 and that the reaction proceeds faster with the L27 N-terminus deprotonated, in contrast to the situation with aminoacyl-tRNA substrates. These results could explain the observed differences in pH dependence between the puromycin and C-puromycin reactions, where the former reaction has been seen to depend on an additional ionizing group besides the attacking amine, and our model predicts this ionizing group to be the N-terminal amine of L27.     

Effect of cytidine-5'-monophosphate on peptidyl transferase activity.

The transfer reaction with pA-fMet as a donor substrate is strongly stimulated by CMP, whereas the transfer reaction with CpApCpCpA-acLeu as a donor substrate is inhibited by CMP. These results indicate that the donor site of peptidyl transferase contains specific binding sites for the terminal adenosine and for the cytidylic acid residue in the terminal sequence CpCpA of tRNA and that an attachment of proper nucleotides to the donor site induces a conformational change in peptidyl transferase.     

Trial for peptide bond formation using model molecules based on the interactions between the CCA sequence of tRNA and 23S rRNA.

The peptidyl transfer reaction catalyzed by the ribosome is a sophisticated product of evolution. The molecular mechanism of peptide bond formation has not been fully elucidated although the essential involvement of 23S rRNA has been established. The universal CCA sequence at the 3'-end of tRNA plays an important role in this process, by interacting with specific nucleotides in 23S rRNA. However, reconstitution of peptidyl transferase activity by a naked 23S rRNA (without the help of any of the ribosomal proteins) has not been reported. To investigate the possible evolutionary development of the peptidyl transfer reaction, we tried to obtain peptide bond formation using a piece of tRNA--an aminoacyl-minihelix--mixed with sequence-specific oligonucleotides that contained puromycin. This system reproduced conceptually the equivalent interactions between the CCA trinucleotide of tRNA and 23S rRNA. Peptide bond formation was detected by gel electrophoresis, TLC and mass spectrometry. These results have implications for the evolution of the peptidyl transfer reaction in biological system.     

A model for how ribosomal release factors induce peptidyl-tRNA cleavage in termination of protein synthesis

A major unresolved question in messenger RNA translation is how ribosomal release factors terminate protein synthesis. Class 1 release factors decode stop codons and trigger hydrolysis of the bond between the nascent polypeptide and tRNA some 75 A away from the decoding site. While the gross features of the release factor-ribosome interaction have been revealed by low-resolution crystal structures, there is no information on the atomic level at either the decoding or peptidyl transfer center. We used extensive computer simulations, constrained by experimental data, to predict how bacterial release factors induce peptide dissociation from the ribosome. A distinct structural solution is presented for how the methylated Gln residue of the universally conserved GGQ release factor motif inserts into the ribosomal A site and promotes rapid reaction with the peptidyl-tRNA substrate. This model explains key mutation experiments and shows that the ribosomal peptidyl transfer center catalyzes its two chemical reactions by a common mechanism.     

Historical review: Peptidyl transfer, the Monro era

The peptide bond-forming reaction of protein synthesis, the peptidyl transfer reaction, takes place in a region of the 50S ribosomal subunit that consists entirely of RNA, the peptidyl transferase centre. Basic to the present knowledge of peptidyl transfer was the discovery by Robin Monro and his colleagues in the 1960s that the reaction is catalyzed by the 50S ribosome. The Monro experiments, and the historical context in which they were conceived, are described in this personal recollection. Monro's 'fragment reaction', the ribosome catalyzed reaction of a fragment of formylmethionyl-tRNA with puromycin, remains in use in work on peptidyl transfer.     

Rapid peptide bond formation on isolated 50S ribosomal subunits

The catalytic site of the ribosome, the peptidyl transferase centre, is located on the large (50S in bacteria) ribosomal subunit. On the basis of results obtained with small substrate analogues, isolated 50S subunits seem to be less active in peptide bond formation than 70S ribosomes by several orders of magnitude, suggesting that the reaction mechanisms on 50S subunits and 70S ribosomes may be different. Here we show that with full-size fMet-tRNA(fMet) and puromycin or C-puromycin as peptide donor and acceptor substrates, respectively, the reaction proceeds as rapidly on 50S subunits as on 70S ribosomes, indicating that the intrinsic activity of 50S subunits is not different from that of 70S ribosomes. The faster reaction on 50S subunits with fMet-tRNA(fMet), compared with oligonucleotide substrate analogues, suggests that full-size transfer RNA in the P site is important for maintaining the active conformation of the peptidyl transferase centre.     

Synthesis of N-labeled peptidyl AMP

This paper deals with the synthesis of a new type of N-labeled peptidyl AMP, which would be used as a good substrate for analysis of the peptidyl transfer reaction on ribosome and for co-crystallization with ribosome. 4-(Dimethylamino)azobenzene-4'-sulfonyl (Dabsyl) was selected as the labeling group. (N-Dabsylglycyl)-L-leucyl AMP was synthesized from glycyl-L-leucine via a three-step procedure.     

Investigation of the ribosomal peptidyl transferase center using a photoaffinity label

The synthesis of a peptidyl-tRNA photoaffinity analog, 2-nitro-4-azidophenoxy-4′-phenylacetyl-phenylalanyl-tRNA^Phe is described. Covalent attachment of this analog to Escherichia coli 70 S ribosomes requires poly(U)-stimulated binding prior to photolysis. Peptidyl site binding is indicated by the ability of puromycin to release the peptidyl moiety from non-photolyzed samples. Covalently attached 2-nitro-4-azidophenoxy-4-phenylacetyl-Phe-tRNA^Phe can subsequently participate in peptidyl transfer with [³H]Phe-tRNA^Phe bound at the aminoacyl site. This means that the covalent reaction does not produce sufficient distortion of the peptidyl site and its bound tRNA to inactivate the peptidyl transference. If peptidyl transfer with [³H]Phe-tRNA^Phe is allowed to proceed before photolysis, covalent reaction can still occur. In all cases, the main reaction products are two 50 S ribosomal proteins, L11 and L18. The results strongly indicate that these two proteins either form part of the peptidyl transferase center or are located adjacent to it. Presumably, α-halocarbonyl affinity reagents used previously failed to identify these two proteins because they lack easily accessible, reactive nucleophilic groups.     

Movement of tRNA but not the nascent peptide during peptide bond formation on ribosomes.

The results from experiments involving nonradiative energy transfer indicate that a fluorescent probe on the 5'-end of tRNA(Phe) moves more than 20 A towards probes on ribosomal protein L1 as a peptide bond is formed during the peptidyl transferase reaction on Escherichia coli ribosomes. The peptide itself moves no more than a few angstroms during peptide bond formation, as judged by the movement of fluorescent probes attached to the phenylalanine amino group of phenylalanyl-tRNA. Other results demonstrate that an analogue of peptidyl-tRNA, deacylated tRNA, and puromycin can be bound simultaneously to the same ribosome, indicating that there are three physically distinct sites to which tRNA is bound during the reaction steps by which peptides are elongated. The results appear to be consistent with the displacement model of peptide elongation.     

An apparent conformational change in tRNA(Phe) that is associated with the peptidyl transferase reaction

Fluorescence techniques were used to detect changes in the conformation of tRNA(Phe) that may occur during the peptidyl transferase reaction in which the tRNA appears to move between binding sites on ribosomes. Such a conformational change may be a fundamental part of the translocation mechanism by which tRNA and mRNA are moved through ribosomes. E. coli tRNA(Phe) was specifically labeled on acp3U47 and s4U8 or at the D positions 16 and 20. The labeled tRNAs were bound to ribosomes as deacylated tRNA(Phe) or AcPhe-tRNA. Changes in fluorescence quantum yield and anisotropy were measured upon binding to the ribosomes and during the peptidyl transferase reaction. In one set of experiments non-radiative energy transfer was measured between a coumarin probe at position 16 or 20 and a fluorescein attached to acp3U47 on the same tRNA(Phe) molecule. The results indicate that the apparent distance between the probes increases during deacylation of AcPhe-tRNA as a result of peptide bond formation. All of the results are consistent with but in themselves do not conclusively establish that tRNA undergoes a conformational change as well as movement during the peptidyl transferase reaction.     

Inhibition of the peptidyl transferase A-site function by 2'-O-aminoacyloligonucleotides

New “non-isomerizable” analogs of the 3′-terminus of AA-tRNA, C-A(2′Phe)H, C-A(2′Phe)Me, C-A(2′H)Phe and C-A(2′Me)Phe, were tested as acceptor substrates of ribosomal peptidyl transferase and inhibitors of the peptidyl transferase A-site function. The 3′-O-AA-derivatives were active acceptors of Ac-Phe in the peptidyl transferase reaction, while the 2′-O-AA-derivatives were completely inactive. Both 2′- and 3′-O-AA-derivatives were potent inhibitors of peptidyl transferase catalyzed Ac-Phe transfer to puromycin. The results indicate that although peptidyl transferase exclusively utilizes 3′-O-esters of tRNA as acceptor substrates, its A-site can also recognize the 3′-terminus of 2′-O-AA-tRNA.     

Inhibition of the Peptide Bond Synthesizing Cycle by Chloramphenicol

To study the mechanism by which chloramphenicol inhibits bacterial protein synthesis, we examined the kinetics of the puromycin-induced release of peptides from transfer ribonucleic acid (tRNA) in the presence and in the absence of chloramphenicol. Washed Escherichia coli ribosomes with nascent peptides which had been radioactively labeled in vivo were used for this study. When such ribosomes were incubated in the presence of 10 mug of puromycin per ml, approximately one-fourth of the radioactive peptide material was rapidly released from tRNA. This rapid, puromycin-dependent reaction is assumed to be equivalent to the peptidyl transferase reaction. Chloramphenicol inhibited the extent of the puromycin-induced release of peptides by only 50%, demonstrating that some of the peptide chains which are present on active ribosomes react with puromycin, even in the presence of chloramphenicol. The addition of the supernatant fraction and guanosine triphosphate (GTP) increased the extent of the puromycin-induced release; this additional release was completely inhibited by chloramphenicol. Peptidyl chains on washed ribosomes prepared from chloramphenicol-inhibited cells were not released by puromycin in the presence of chloramphenicol and reacted slowly with puromycin in the absence of chloramphenicol. The release of peptidyl groups from these ribosomes became largely insensitive to chloramphenicol after preincubation of the ribosomes with GTP and the supernatant fraction. We conclude that chloramphenicol does not inhibit the peptidyl transferase reaction as measured by the puromycin-induced release of peptides from tRNA, but rather inhibits some step in the peptide synthesis cycle prior to this reaction.     

Essential mechanisms in the catalysis of peptide bond formation on the ribosome

Peptide bond formation is the main catalytic function of the ribosome. The mechanism of catalysis is presumed to be highly conserved in all organisms. We tested the conservation by comparing mechanistic features of the peptidyl transfer reaction on ribosomes from Escherichia coli and the Gram-positive bacterium Mycobacterium smegmatis. In both cases, the major contribution to catalysis was the lowering of the activation entropy. The rate of peptide bond formation was pH independent with the natural substrate, amino-acyl-tRNA, but was slowed down 200-fold with decreasing pH when puromycin was used as a substrate analog. Mutation of the conserved base A2451 of 23 S rRNA to U did not abolish the pH dependence of the reaction with puromycin in M. smegmatis, suggesting that A2451 did not confer the pH dependence. However, the A2451U mutation alters the structure of the peptidyl transferase center and changes the pattern of pH-dependent rearrangements, as probed by chemical modification of 23 S rRNA. A2451 seems to function as a pivot point in ordering the structure of the peptidyl transferase center rather than taking part in chemical catalysis.     

Synthesis Of N-Labeled Peptidyl AMP

Abstract

This paper deals with the synthesis of a new type of N-labeled peptidyl AMP, which would be used as a good substrate for analysis of the peptidyl transfer reaction on ribosome and for co-crystallization with ribosome. 4-(Dimethylamino)azobenzene-4′-sulfonyl (Dabsyl) was selected as the labeling group. (N-Dabsylglycyl)-L-leucyl AMP was synthesized from glycyl-L-leucine via a three-step procedure.     

The influence of the concentrations of elongation factors and tRNAs on the dynamics and accuracy of protein biosynthesis

Computer simulations of the elongation cycle of bacterial protein biosynthesis demonstrate that the accuracy of protein biosynthesis cannot be explained by a mechanism which involves only an initial selection and a proofreading reaction. It is suggested that only a combination of initial selection, proofreading and a retardation of non-cognate flows at the level of the EF-Tu-catalyzed GTPase reaction and the peptidyl transfer can guarantee sufficient accuracy at reasonable costs. According to this view the ribosome functions as an allosteric enzyme which, in both its affinity and enzymatic activity, responds optimally only to the cognate substrate. Detailed calculations show, furthermore, that increasing the concentration of EF-G and EF-Ts above the level prevailing in vivo only slightly increases the rate of elongation. In contrast, increasing the concentration of EF-Tu over aminoacyl-tRNA (aa-tRNA) leads to a sharp decline in the rate of elongation. While varying the concentration of EF-G has no effect on the accuracy of protein synthesis, excess of EF-Tu over aminoacyl-tRNA leads to a large increase in accuracy. These results suggest a mechanism by which the accuracy of protein biosynthesis is preserved during amino acid starvation.     

Peptidyl sulfonium salts. A new class of protease inhibitors

The possibility has been examined that peptidylmethyl sulfonium salts might affinity label proteases by an alkyl transfer from sulfur to an active center residue. The synthesis of a number of agents of this type is described as well as initial results of their effect on cysteinyl proteases, papain and cathepsin B. These are readily inactivated by reagents in which the peptidyl portion contains features that promote binding to the proteases such as a penultimate phenylalanine residue. Irreversible inactivation ensues by transfer of the peptidyl portion, not methyl groups. Peptidylmethyl sulfonium salts lose a proton to form an ylide structure which may be the prevalent form at physiological pH values. The ylide may also be the active affinity labeling form of the reagent since the rate of inactivation of cathepsin B increases with pH. In contrast, the action of another affinity labeling reagent for cathepsin B, benzyloxycarbonyl-Phe-AlaCHN2, a diazomethyl ketone, is relatively independent of pH.     

SPARK--a novel method to monitor ribosomal peptidyl transferase activity

The key enzymatic activity of the ribosome is catalysis of peptide bond formation. This reaction is a target for many clinically important antibiotics. However, the molecular mechanisms of the peptidyl transfer reaction, the catalytic contribution of the ribosome, and the mechanisms of antibiotic action are still poorly understood. Here we describe a novel, simple, convenient, and sensitive method for monitoring peptidyl transferase activity (SPARK). In this method, the ribosomal peptidyl transferase forms a peptide bond between two ligands, one of which is tritiated whereas the other is biotin-tagged. Transpeptidation results in covalent attachment of the biotin moiety to a tritiated compound. The amount of the reaction product is then directly quantified using the scintillation proximity assay technology: binding of the tritiated radioligand to the commercially available streptavidin-coated beads causes excitation of the bead-embedded scintillant, resulting in detection of radioactivity. The reaction is readily inhibited by known antibiotics, inhibitors of peptide bond formation. The method we developed is amenable to simple automation which makes it useful for screening for new antibiotics. The method is useful for different types of ribosomal research. Using this method, we investigated the effect of mutations at a universally conserved nucleotide of the active site of 23S rRNA, A2602 (Escherichia coli numbering), on the peptidyl transferase activity of the ribosome. The activities of the in vitro reconstituted mutant subunits, though somewhat reduced, were comparable with those of the subunits assembled with the wild-type 23S rRNA, indicating that A2602 mutations do not abolish the ability of the ribosome to catalyze peptide bond formation. Similar results were obtained with double mutants carrying mutations at A2602 and another universally conserved nucleotide in the peptidyl transferase center, A2451. The obtained results agree with our previous conclusion that the ribosome accelerates peptide bond formation primarily through entropic rather than chemical catalysis.     

Chemical engineering of the peptidyl transferase center reveals an important role of the 2'-hydroxyl group of A2451

The main enzymatic reaction of the large ribosomal subunit is peptide bond formation. Ribosome crystallography showed that A2451 of 23S rRNA makes the closest approach to the attacking amino group of aminoacyl-tRNA. Mutations of A2451 had relatively small effects on transpeptidation and failed to unequivocally identify the crucial functional group(s). Here, we employed an in vitro reconstitution system for chemical engineering the peptidyl transferase center by introducing non-natural nucleosides at position A2451. This allowed us to investigate the peptidyl transfer reaction performed by a ribosome that contained a modified nucleoside at the active site. The main finding is that ribosomes carrying a 2′-deoxyribose at A2451 showed a compromised peptidyl transferase activity. In variance, adenine base modifications and even the removal of the entire nucleobase at A2451 had only little impact on peptide bond formation, as long as the 2′-hydroxyl was present. This implicates a functional or structural role of the 2′-hydroxyl group at A2451 for transpeptidation.     

Peptidyl transferase centres of rat and yeast ribosomes. Different response to modification of protein amino groups

Modification of rat liver ribosomes with dimethylmaleic anhydride, a reagent for protein amino groups, causes a large stimulation of peptidyl transferase activity assayed by the "fragment" reaction, as well as the inactivation of poly(U)-directed polyphenylalanine synthesis. In contrast to rat ribosomes, the peptidyl transferase of yeast ribosomes is little affected by modification. Although other interpretations are not excluded, these results might be due to differences between the peptidyl transferase centres of mammalian and yeast ribosomes.     

Drop-off-reinitiation triggered by EF-G-driven mistranslocation and its alleviation by EF-P

In ribosomal translation, peptidyl transfer occurs between P-site peptidyl-tRNA and A-site aminoacyl-tRNA, followed by translocation of the resulting P-site deacylated-tRNA and A-site peptidyl-tRNA to E and P site, respectively, mediated by EF-G. Here, we report that mistranslocation of P-site peptidyl-tRNA and A-site aminoacyl-tRNA toward E and A site occurs when high concentration of EF-G triggers the migration of two tRNAs prior to completion of peptidyl transfer. Consecutive incorporation of less reactive amino acids, such as Pro and d-Ala, makes peptidyl transfer inefficient and thus induces the mistranslocation event. Consequently, the E-site peptidyl-tRNA drops off from ribosome to give a truncated peptide lacking the C-terminal region. The P-site aminoacyl-tRNA allows for reinitiation of translation upon accommodation of a new aminoacyl-tRNA at A site, leading to synthesis of a truncated peptide lacking the N-terminal region, which we call the ‘reinitiated peptide’. We also revealed that such a drop-off-reinitiation event can be alleviated by EF-P that promotes peptidyl transfer of Pro. Moreover, this event takes place both in vitro and in cell, showing that reinitiated peptides during protein synthesis could be accumulated in this pathway in cells.