Differential sorting of human delta-opioid receptors after internalization by peptide and alkaloid agonists

Desensitization and internalization of G protein-coupled receptors observed after agonist activation are considered two important regulatory processes of receptor transduction. Endogenous human delta-opioid receptors (hDOR) are differentially regulated in terms of desensitization by peptide ([d-Pen2,5]enkephalin (DPDPE) and Deltorphin I) and alkaloid (etorphine) agonists in the neuroblastoma cell line SK-N-BE (Allouche, S., Roussel, M., Marie, N., and Jauzac, P. (1999) Eur. J. Pharmacol. 371, 235-240). In the present study, we examined the role of hDOR internalization and down-regulation in this differential desensitization. Sustained activation by peptides for 30 min caused a marked decrease of both [3H]diprenorphine binding sites and hDOR immunoreactivity, observed in a Western blot, whereas a moderate reduction by 30% was observed after a 30- and 60-min etorphine exposure in binding experiments without opioid receptor degradation. Using fluorescence microscopy, we visualized hDOR internalization promoted by different agonists in SK-N-BE cells expressing FLAG-tagged hDOR. Agonist withdrawal results in a greater recycling process correlated with a stronger hDOR resensitization after etorphine treatment compared with DPDPE or Deltorphin I, as shown in binding, immunocytochemical, and functional experiments. This suggests a distinct sorting of opioid receptors after their internalization. We demonstrated a lysosomal hDOR targeting upon peptides by using chloroquine in binding, Western blot, and immunocytochemical experiments and by colocalization of this receptor with a late endosome marker. In contrast, when the recycling endosome blocker monensin was used, acceleration of desensitization associated with a strong intracellular immunostaining was observed upon etorphine treatment. The possibility of separate endocytic pathways responsible for the differential sorting of hDOR upon peptide and alkaloid ligand exposure was ruled out by binding and immunocytochemical experiments using sucrose hypertonic solution. First, these results showed complex relationships between hDOR internalization/down-regulation and desensitization. Second, we demonstrated for the first time that the same receptor could undergo a distinct sorting after internalization by peptide and alkaloid agonists.     

Characterization of [125I]AR-M100613, a high-affinity radioligand for delta opioid receptors

AR-M100613 ([I]-Dmt-c[-D-Orn-2-Nal-D-Pro-D-Ala-]) is the iodinated analog of a cyclic casomorphin previously shown to be a potent antagonist at the delta opioid receptor. Specific [125I]AR-M100613 binding to rat whole brain membranes was saturable, reversible, and best fit to a one-site model (Kd = 0.080 +/- 0.008 nM, Bmax = 45.2 +/- 4.4 fmol/mg protein). [125I]AR-M100613 binding was displaced with high affinity by the delta opioid receptor ligands SNC-80, Deltorphin II and DPDPE but not the mu or kappa-selective receptor ligands DAMGO and U69593. Residual non-selective binding of [125I]AR-M 100613 to mu opioid receptors is blocked by the addition of CTOP to the assay buffer. [35S]GTPgammaS binding assays indicate that AR-M100613 is a potent, selective, and reversible antagonist for delta opioid receptors in rat brain membranes. The high-affinity, high specific activity, low nonspecific binding and antagonist profile of [125I]AR-M100613 favor its use as a radiochemical probe for delta opioid receptors.     

Deltorphin II-induced rapid desensitization of delta-opioid receptor requires both phosphorylation and internalization of the receptor

Similar to other G protein-coupled receptors, rapid phosphorylation of the delta-opioid receptor in the presence of agonist has been reported. Hence, agonist-induced desensitization of the delta-opioid receptor has been suggested to be via the receptor phosphorylation, arrestin-mediated pathway. However, due to the highly efficient coupling between the delta-opioid receptor and the adenylyl cyclase, the direct correlation between the rates of receptor phosphorylation and receptor desensitization as measured by the adenylyl cyclase activity could not be established. In the current studies, using an ecdysone-inducible expression system to control the delta-opioid receptor levels in HEK293 cells, we could demonstrate that the rate of deltorphin II-induced receptor desensitization is dependent on the receptor level. Only at receptor concentrations 相似文献   

Internalization and recycling of human mu opioid receptors expressed in Sf9 insect cells

Internalization and recycling of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), such as the mu-opioid receptor, largely depend on agonist stimulation. Agonist-promoted internalization of some GPCRs has been shown to mediate receptor desensitization, resensitization, and down-regulation. In this study, we investigated whether different mu opioid agonists displayed different effects in receptor internalization and recycling, the potential mechanisms involved in ohmefentanyl-induced internalization process. In transfected Sf9 insect cells expressing 6His-tagged wild type mu opioid receptor, exposure to 100 nM ohmefentanyl caused a maximum internalization of the receptor at 30 min and receptors seemed to reappear at the cell membrane after 60 min as determined by radioligand binding assay. Ohmefentanyl-induced human mu opioid receptor internalization was concentration-dependent, with about 40% of the receptors internalized following a 30-min exposure to 1 microM ohmefentanyl. 10 microM morphine and 1 microM DAMGO could also induce about 40% internalization. The antagonist naloxone and pretreatment with pertussis toxin both blocked ohmefentanyl-induced internalization without affecting internalization themselves. Incubation with sucrose 0.45 M significantly inhibited ohmefentanyl-induced internalization of the mu receptor. The removal of agonists ohmefentanyl and morphine resulted in the receptors gradually returning to the cell surface over a 60 min period, while the removal of agonist DAMGO only partly resulted in the receptor recycling. The results of this study suggest that ohmefentanyl-induced internalization of human mu opioid receptor in Sf9 insect cells occurs via Gi/o protein-dependent process that likely involves clathrin-coated pits. In addition, the recycling process displays the differential modes of action of different agonists.     

Agonist-induced internalization and recycling of the human A(3) adenosine receptors: role in receptor desensitization and resensitization

A(3) adenosine receptors have been proposed to play an important role in the pathophysiology of cerebral ischemia with a regimen-dependent nature of the therapeutic effects probably related to receptor desensitization and down-regulation. Here we studied the agonist-induced internalization of human A(3) adenosine receptors in transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells, and then we evaluated the relationship between internalization and signal desensitization and resensitization. Binding of N(6)-(4-amino-3-[(125)I]iodobenzyl)adenosine-5'-N-methyluronamide to membranes from Chinese hamster ovary cells stably transfected with the human A(3) adenosine receptor showed a profile typical of these receptors in other cell lines (K:(D) = 1.3+/-0.08 nM; B(max) = 400+/-28 fmol/mg of proteins). The iodinated agonist, bound at 4 degrees C to whole transfected cells, was internalized by increasing the temperature to 37 degrees C with a rate constant of 0.04+/-0.034 min(-1). Agonist-induced internalization of A(3) adenosine receptors was directly demonstrated by immunogold electron microscopy, which revealed the localization of these receptors in plasma membranes and intracellular vesicles. Moreover, short-term exposure of these cells to the agonist caused rapid desensitization as tested in adenylyl cyclase assays. Subsequent removal of the agonist led to restoration of the receptor function and recycling of the receptors to the cell surface. The rate constant of receptor recycling was 0.02+/-0.0017 min(-1). Blockade of internalization and recycling demonstrated that internalization did not affect signal desensitization, whereas recycling of internalized receptors was implicated in the signal resensitization.     

In Vivo Delta Opioid Receptor Internalization Controls Behavioral Effects of Agonists

Background

GPCRs regulate a remarkable diversity of biological functions, and are thus often targeted for drug therapies. Stimulation of a GPCR by an extracellular ligand triggers receptor signaling via G proteins, and this process is highly regulated. Receptor activation is typically accompanied by desensitization of receptor signaling, a complex feedback regulatory process of which receptor internalization is postulated as a key event. The in vivo significance of GPCR internalization is poorly understood. In fact, the majority of studies have been performed in transfected cell systems, which do not adequately model physiological environments and the complexity of integrated responses observed in the whole animal.

Methods and Findings

In this study, we used knock-in mice expressing functional fluorescent delta opioid receptors (DOR-eGFP) in place of the native receptor to correlate receptor localization in neurons with behavioral responses. We analyzed the pain-relieving effects of two delta receptor agonists with similar signaling potencies and efficacies, but distinct internalizing properties. An initial treatment with the high (SNC80) or low (AR-M100390) internalizing agonist equally reduced CFA-induced inflammatory pain. However, subsequent drug treatment produced highly distinct responses. Animals initially treated with SNC80 showed no analgesic response to a second dose of either delta receptor agonist. Concomitant receptor internalization and G-protein uncoupling were observed throughout the nervous system. This loss of function was temporary, since full DOR-eGFP receptor responses were restored 24 hours after SNC80 administration. In contrast, treatment with AR-M100390 resulted in retained analgesic response to a subsequent agonist injection, and ex vivo analysis showed that DOR-eGFP receptor remained G protein-coupled on the cell surface. Finally SNC80 but not AR-M100390 produced DOR-eGFP phosphorylation, suggesting that the two agonists produce distinct active receptor conformations in vivo which likely lead to differential receptor trafficking.

Conclusions

Together our data show that delta agonists retain full analgesic efficacy when receptors remain on the cell surface. In contrast, delta agonist-induced analgesia is abolished following receptor internalization, and complete behavioral desensitization is observed. Overall these results establish that, in the context of pain control, receptor localization fully controls receptor function in vivo. This finding has both fundamental and therapeutic implications for slow-recycling GPCRs.     

SK-N-BE: A Human Neuroblastoma Cell Line Containing Two Subtypes of δ-Opioid Receptors

Abstract: A human neuroblastoma cell line, SK-N-BE, was shown to express a substantial amount of opioid receptors (200–300 fmol/mg of protein). A ligand binding profile of these receptors revealed that they could belong to two distinct subtypes of δ-opioid receptors. Results from sucrose-gradient sedimentation experiments were compared with similar data obtained with the μ-opioid receptor of the rabbit cerebellum and the δ-opioid receptor of the hybrid NG108–15 cell line and have shown that the opioid receptor of the SK-N-BE cell line behaved hydrodynamically as an intermediate between μ-and δ-opioid receptors. Taken together, pharmacological and hydrodynamic studies suggest that the opioid receptors present in the SK-N-BE cell membranes could belong to two δ-opioid receptor subtypes interacting allosterically. Functional experiments suggest that at least one of these subtypes of δ-opioid receptor is negatively coupled to the adenylate cyclase via a G_i protein and that the opiate receptors of the SK-N-BE neuroblastoma cell line undergo a rapid down-regulation when preincubated in the presence of the high-affinity opioid agonist, etorphine.     

U50,488H-induced internalization of the human kappa opioid receptor involves a beta-arrestin- and dynamin-dependent mechanism. Kappa receptor internalization is not required for mitogen-activated protein kinase activation

Agonist-promoted internalization of some G protein-coupled receptors has been shown to mediate receptor desensitization, resensitization, and down-regulation. In this study, we investigated whether opioids induced internalization of the human and rat kappa opioid receptors stably expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells, the potential mechanisms involved in this process and its possible role in activation of mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase. Exposure of the human kappa receptor to the agonists U50,488H, U69,593, ethylketocyclazocine, or tifluadom, but not etorphine, promoted receptor internalization. However, none of these agonists induced significant internalization of the rat kappa opioid receptor. U50, 488H-induced human kappa receptor internalization was time- and concentration-dependent, with 30-40% of the receptors internalized following a 30-min exposure to 1 microM U50,488H. Agonist removal resulted in the receptors gradually returning to the cell surface over a 60-min period. The antagonist naloxone blocked U50, 488H-induced internalization without affecting internalization itself, while pretreatment with pertussis toxin had no effect on U50, 488H-induced internalization. In contrast, incubation with sucrose (0.4-0.8 M) significantly reduced U50,488H-induced internalization of the kappa receptor. While co-expression of the wild type GRK2, beta-arrestin, or dynamin I had no effect on kappa receptor internalization, co-expression of the dominant negative mutants GRK2-K220R, beta-arrestin (319-418), or dynamin I-K44A significantly inhibited receptor internalization. Whether receptor internalization is critical for MAP kinase activation was next investigated. Co-expression of dominant negative mutants of beta-arrestin or dynamin I, which greatly reduced U50,488H-induced internalization, did not affect MAP kinase activation by the agonist. In addition, etorphine, which did not promote human kappa receptor internalization, was able to fully activate MAP kinase. Moreover, U50,488H or etorphine stimulation of the rat kappa receptor, which did not undergo internalization, also effectively activated MAP kinase. Thus, U50,488H-induced internalization of the human kappa opioid receptor in Chinese hamster ovary cells occurs via a GRK-, beta-arrestin-, and dynamin I-dependent process that likely involves clathrin-coated pits. In addition, internalization of the kappa receptor is not required for activation of MAP kinase.     

Agonist-independent desensitization and internalization of the human platelet-activating factor receptor by coumermycin-gyrase B-induced dimerization

Platelet-activating factor (PAF) is a phospholipid with potent and diverse physiological actions, particularly as a mediator of inflammation. We have reported previously that mutant G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) affect the functional properties of coexpressed wild-type human PAF receptor (hPAFR) (Le Gouill, C., Parent, J. L., Caron, C. A., Gaudreau, R., Volkov, L., Rola-Pleszczynski, M., and Stankova, J. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 12548-12554). Increasing evidence suggests that dimerization of GPCRs may play an important role in the regulation of their biological activity. Additional data have also suggested that dimerization may be important in the subsequent internalization of the delta-opioid receptor. To investigate the specific role of dimerization in the internalization process of GPCRs, we generated a fusion protein of hPAFR and bacterial DNA gyrase B (GyrB), dimerized through the addition of coumermycin. We found that dimerization potentiates PAF-induced internalization of hPAFR-GyrB in Chinese hamster ovary cells stably expressing c-Myc-hPAFR-GyrB. Coumermycin-driven dimerization was also sufficient to induce an agonist-independent sequestration process in an arrestin- and clathrin-independent manner. Moreover, the protein kinase C inhibitors staurosporine and GF109203X blocked the coumermycin-induced desensitization of hPAFR-GyrB, suggesting the implication of protein kinase C in the molecular mechanism mediating the agonist-independent desensitization of the receptor. Taken together, these findings suggest a novel mechanism of GPCR desensitization and internalization triggered by dimerization.     

Phosphorylation of Ser363, Thr370, and Ser375 residues within the carboxyl tail differentially regulates mu-opioid receptor internalization

Prolonged activation of opioid receptors leads to their phosphorylation, desensitization, internalization, and down-regulation. To elucidate the relationship between mu-opioid receptor (MOR) phosphorylation and the regulation of receptor activity, a series of receptor mutants was constructed in which the 12 Ser/Thr residues of the COOH-terminal portion of the receptor were substituted to Ala, either individually or in combination. All these mutant constructs were stably expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells and exhibited similar expression levels and ligand binding properties. Among those 12 Ser/Thr residues, Ser(363), Thr(370), and Ser(375) have been identified as phosphorylation sites. In the absence of the agonist, a basal phosphorylation of Ser(363) and Thr(370) was observed, whereas [d-Ala(2),Me-Phe(4),Gly(5)-ol]enkephalin (DAMGO)-induced receptor phosphorylation occurs at Thr(370) and Ser(375) residues. Furthermore, the role of these phosphorylation sites in regulating the internalization of MOR was investigated. The mutation of Ser(375) to Ala reduced the rate and extent of receptor internalization, whereas mutation of Ser(363) and Thr(370) to Ala accelerated MOR internalization kinetics. The present data show that the basal phosphorylation of MOR could play a role in modulating agonist-induced receptor internalization kinetics. Furthermore, even though mu-receptors and delta-opioid receptors have the same motif encompassing agonist-induced phosphorylation sites, the different agonist-induced internalization properties controlled by these sites suggest differential cellular regulation of these two receptor subtypes.     

Different kinases desensitize the human delta-opioid receptor (hDOP-R) in the neuroblastoma cell line SK-N-BE upon peptidic and alkaloid agonists

In a previous work, we described a differential desensitization of the human δ-opioid receptor (hDOP-R) by etorphine (a non-selective and alkaloid agonist) and δ-selective and peptidic agonists (DPDPE ([d-Pen^2,5]enkephalin) and deltorphin I (Tyr-d-Ala-Phe-Asp-Val-Val-Gly-NH₂)) in the neuroblastoma cell line SK-N-BE (Allouche et al., Eur. J. Pharmacol., 371, 235, 1999). In the present study, we explored the putative role of different kinases in this differential regulation.

First, selective chemical inhibitors of PKA, PKC and tyrosine kinases were used and we showed a significant reduction of etorphine-induced opioid receptor desensitization by the bisindolylmaleimide I (PKC inhibitor) while genistein (tyrosine kinase inhibitor) was potent to impair desensitization induced by the different agonists. When the PKA was inhibited by H89 pretreatment, no modification of opioid receptor desensitization was observed whatever the agonist used.

Second, we further studied the role of G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) and by using western-blot experiments we observed that only the GRK2 isoform was expressed in the SK-N-BE cells. Next, the neuroblastoma cells were transfected with the wild type GRK2 or its dominant negative mutant GRK2-K220R and the inhibition on cAMP level was determined in naïve and agonist-pretreated cells. We showed that over-expression of GRK2-K220R totally abolished etorphine-induced receptor desensitization while no effect was observed with peptidic agonists and over-expression of GRK2 selectively impaired cAMP inhibition promoted by etorphine suggesting that this kinase was involved in the regulation of hDOP-R activated only by etorphine.

Third, correlation between functional experiments and phosphorylation of the hDOP-R after agonist activation was assessed by western-blot using the specific anti-phospho-DOP-R Ser³⁶³ antibody. While all agonists were potent to increase phosphorylation of opioid receptor, we showed no impairment of receptor phosphorylation level after PKC inhibitor pretreatment. Upon agonist activation, no enhancement of receptor phosphorylation was observed when the GRK2 was over-expressed while the GRK2-K220R partially reduced the hDOP-R Ser³⁶³ phosphorylation only after peptidic agonists pretreatment.

In conclusion, hDOP-R desensitization upon etorphine exposure relies on the GRK2, PKC and tyrosine kinases while DPDPE and deltorphin I mediate desensitization at least via tyrosine kinases. Although the Ser³⁶³ was described as the primary phosphorylation site of the mouse DOP-R, we observed no correlation between desensitization and phosphorylation of this amino acid.     

Rapid internalization and recycling of the human neuropeptide Y Y(1) receptor.

Desensitization of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) involves receptor phosphorylation and reduction in the number of receptors at the cell surface. The neuropeptide Y (NPY) Y(1) receptor undergoes fast desensitization. We examined agonist-induced signaling and internalization using NPY Y(1) receptors fused to green fluorescent protein (EGFP). When expressed in HEK293 cells, EGFP-hNPY Y(1) receptors were localized at the plasma membrane, desensitized rapidly as assessed using calcium responses, and had similar properties compared to hNPY Y(1) receptors. Upon agonist challenge, the EGFP signal decreased rapidly (t(1/2) = 107 +/- 3 s) followed by a slow recovery. This decrease was blocked by BIBP3226, a Y(1) receptor antagonist, or by pertussis toxin, in agreement with Y(1) receptor activation. Internalization of EGFP-hNPY Y(1) receptors to acidic endosomal compartments likely accounts for the decrease in the EGFP signal, being absent after pretreatment with monensin. Concanavalin A and hypertonic sucrose, which inhibit clathrin-mediated endocytosis, blocked the decrease in fluorescence. After agonist, intracellular EGFP signals were punctate and co-localized with transferrin-Texas Red, a marker of clathrin-associated internalization and recycling, but not with LysoTracker Red, a lysosomal pathway marker, supporting receptor trafficking to recycling endosomes rather than the late endosomal/lysosomal pathway. Pulse-chase experiments revealed no receptor degradation after internalization. The slow recovery of fluorescence was unaffected by cycloheximide or actinomycin D, indicating that de novo synthesis of receptors was not limiting. Use of a multicompartment model to fit our fluorescence data allows simultaneous determination of internalization and recycling rate constants. We propose that rapid internalization of receptors via the clathrin-coated pits recycling pathway may largely account for the rapid desensitization of NPY Y(1) receptors.     

Opioid activity of C8813, a novel and potent opioid analgesic

Compound trans-4-(p-bromophenyl)-4-(dimethylamino)-1-(2-thiophen-2-yl-ethyl)-cyclohexanol (C8813), structurally unrelated to morphine, is a novel analgesic. The present study examined the antinociception, opioid receptor selectivity and in vitro activity of C8813. The antinociceptive activity was evaluated using mouse hot plate and acetic acid writhing tests. In mouse hot plate test, the antinociceptive ED(50) of C8813 was 11.5 microg/kg, being 591 times and 3.4 times more potent than morphine and fentanyl respectively. In mouse writhing test, the antinociceptive ED(50) of C8813 was 16.9 microg/kg, being 55 times and 2.3 times more active than morphine and fentanyl respectively. In the opioid receptor binding assay, C8813 showed high affinity for mu-opioid receptor (K(i) = 1.37 nM) and delta-opioid receptor (K(i) = 3.24 nM) but almost no affinity for kappa-opioid receptor (at 1 microM). In the bioassay, the inhibitory effect of C8813 in the guinea-pig ileum (GPI) was 16.5 times more potent than in the mouse vas deferens (MVD). The inhibitory effects of C8813 in the GPI and MVD could be antagonized by mu-opioid receptor antagonist naloxone and delta-opioid receptor antagonist ICI174,864 respectively. However, the inhibitory effect of C8813 in the rabbit vas deferens was very weak. These results indicated that C8813 was a potent analgesic and a high affinity agonist for the mu- and delta-opioid receptors.     

Tracking the opioid receptors on the way of desensitization

Opioid receptors belong to the super family of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) and are the targets of numerous opioid analgesic drugs. Prolonged use of these drugs results in a reduction of their effectiveness in pain relief also called tolerance, a phenomenon well known by physicians. Opioid receptor desensitization is thought to play a major role in tolerance and a lot of work has been dedicated to elucidate the molecular basis of desensitization. As described for most of GPCRs, opioid receptor desensitization involves their phosphorylation by kinases and their uncoupling from G-proteins realized by arrestins. More recently, opioid receptor trafficking was shown to contribute to desensitization. In this review, our knowledge on the molecular mechanisms of desensitization and recent progress on the role of opioid receptor internalization, recycling or degradation in desensitization will be reported. A better understanding of these regulatory mechanisms would be helpful to develop new analgesic drugs or new strategies for pain treatment by limiting opioid receptor desensitization and tolerance.     

Characterization of beta-125I-endorphin cross-linked proteins in NG108-15 cell membranes. A 25-kilodalton protein with properties of delta-opioid-binding site.

Cross-linking of beta-125I-endorphin to NG108-15 cell membranes labeled bands with molecular masses of 55, 35, and 25 kDa on sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. We applied several criteria to evaluate the relevance of these cross-linked bands to delta-opioid receptors, including selectivity, stereospecificity, affinity, G-protein coupling, down-regulation, and correlation with opioid receptor level in different well-characterized cell lines. Only the 25 kDa protein adequately fulfilled all these criteria. Thus, cross-linking to the 25-kDa band was selectively inhibited by ligands with delta-opioid affinity, but not by mu-opioid, kappa-opioid, or optically inactive opioid ligands or by non-opioid ligands. Based on inhibition of cross-linking, we calculated an affinity of [D-Ala2,D-Leu5]enkephalin binding to the 25-kDa and (Kd = 6 nM) that is similar to that reported for [D-Ala2,D-Leu5]enkephalin binding to NG108-15 membranes; this affinity decreased approximately 10-fold in the presence of Na+/guanyl-5'-yl imidodiphosphate. Chronic agonist treatment of NG108-15 cells reduced cross-linking to the 25-kDa band, but not to others, in a manner parallel to down-regulation of opioid receptors. Finally, the amount of the 25-kDa band was roughly proportional to the level of opioid receptors present in N18TG2, NS20Y, ST7-3, and ST8-4 cells. The 25-kDa band was absent in PC12h, NIH3T3, and C6BU1 cells as well as in liver, all of which had no detectable opioid binding.     

Effect of the A118G polymorphism on binding affinity, potency and agonist-mediated endocytosis, desensitization, and resensitization of the human mu-opioid receptor

The most prevalent single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) A118G in the human mu-opioid receptor gene predicts an amino acid change from an asparagine residue to an aspartatic residue in amino acid position 40. This N40D mutation, which has been implicated in the development of opioid addiction, was previously reported to result in an increased beta-endorphin binding affinity and a decreased potency of morphine-6-glucuronide. Therefore, in the present study we have investigated whether this mutation might affect the binding affinity, potency, and/or the agonist-induced desensitization, internalization and resensitization of the human mu-opioid receptor stably expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells. With the exception of a reduced expression level of N40D compared to human mu-opioid receptor (hMOR) in HEK293 cells, our analyses revealed no marked functional differences between N40D and wild-type receptor. Morphine, morphine-6-glucuronide and beta-endorphin revealed similar binding affinities and potencies for both receptors. Both the N40D-variant receptor and hMOR exhibited robust receptor internalization in the presence of the opioid peptide [d-Ala(2),N-MePhe(4),Glyol(5)]enkephalin (DAMGO) and beta-endorphin but not in response to morphine or morphine-6-glucuronide. After prolonged treatment with morphine, morphine-6-glucuronide or beta-endorphin both receptors showed similiar desensitization time courses. In addition, the receptor resensitization rates were nearly identical for both receptor types.     

C-terminal splice variants of the mouse mu-opioid receptor differ in morphine-induced internalization and receptor resensitization

The main analgesic effects of the opioid alkaloid morphine are mediated by the mu-opioid receptor. In contrast to endogenous opioid peptides, morphine activates the mu-opioid receptor without causing its rapid endocytosis. Recently, three novel C-terminal splice variants (MOR1C, MOR1D, and MOR1E) of the mouse mu-opioid receptor (MOR1) have been identified. In the present study, we show that these receptors differ substantially in their agonist-selective membrane trafficking. MOR1 and MOR1C stably expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells exhibited phosphorylation, internalization, and down-regulation in the presence of the opioid peptide [d-Ala(2),Me-Phe(4),Gly(5)-ol]enkephalin (DAMGO) but not in response to morphine. In contrast, MOR1D and MOR1E exhibited robust phosphorylation, internalization, and down-regulation in response to both DAMGO and morphine. DAMGO elicited a similar desensitization (during an 8-h exposure) and resensitization (during a 50-min drug-free interval) of all four mu-receptor splice variants. After morphine treatment, however, MOR1 and MOR1C showed a faster desensitization and no resensitization as compared with MOR1D and MOR1E. These results strongly reinforce the hypothesis that receptor phosphorylation and internalization are required for opioid receptor reactivation thus counteracting agonist-induced desensitization. Our findings also suggest a mechanism by which cell- and tissue-specific C-terminal splicing of the mu-opioid receptor may significantly modulate the development of tolerance to the various effects of morphine.     

The glucagon-like peptide-2 receptor C terminus modulates beta-arrestin-2 association but is dispensable for ligand-induced desensitization, endocytosis, and G-protein-dependent effector activation

Classic models of receptor desensitization and internalization have been largely based on the behavior of Family A G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). The glucagon-like peptide-2 receptor (GLP-2R) is a member of the Family B glucagon-secretin GPCR family, which exhibit significant sequence and structural differences from the Family A receptors in their intracellular and extracellular domains. To identify structural motifs that regulate GLP-2R signaling and cell surface receptor expression, we analyzed the functional properties of a series of mutant GLP-2Rs. The majority of the C-terminal receptor tail was dispensable for GLP-2-induced cAMP accumulation, ERK1/2 activation, and endocytosis in transfected cells. However, progressive truncation of the C terminus reduced cell surface receptor expression, altered agonist-induced GLP-2R trafficking, and abrogated protein kinase A-mediated heterologous receptor desensitization. Elimination of the distal 21 amino acids of the receptor was sufficient to promote constitutive receptor internalization and prevent agonist-induced recruitment of beta-arrestin-2. Site-directed mutagenesis identified specific amino acid residues within the distal GLP-2R C terminus that mediate the stable association with beta-arrestin-2. Surprisingly, although the truncated mutant receptors failed to interact with beta-arrestin-2, they underwent homologous desensitization and subsequent resensitization with kinetics similar to that observed with the wild-type GLP-2R. Our data suggest that, although the GLP-2R C terminus is not required for coupling to cellular machinery regulating signaling or desensitization, it may serve as a sorting signal for intracellular trafficking. Taken together with the previously demonstrated clathrin and dynamin-independent, lipid-raft-dependent pathways for internalization, our data suggest that GLP-2 receptor signaling has evolved unique structural and functional mechanisms for control of receptor trafficking, desensitization, and resensitization.     

Desensitization of the Neurokinin 1 Receptor Is Mediated by the Receptor Carboxy-Terminal Region, but Is Not Caused by Receptor Internalization

Abstract: The carboxy-terminal cytoplasmic regions of the rat neurokinin 1 (substance P) and neurokinin 2 (neurokinin A) receptors have been exchanged to determine if this region of the neurokinin 1 receptor is involved in its desensitization. When expressed at similar levels in stably transfected Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell lines, receptors containing the carboxy-terminal region of the neurokinin 1 receptor desensitized significantly more (as measured by reduction of the inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate response) when preexposed for 1 min to 1 µ M neurokinin, indicating a role for the carboxy-terminal region of the neurokinin 1 receptor in its desensitization. Measurement of receptor internalization using radiolabeled neurokinins (0.3 n M ) indicated that ∼75–80% of the receptors were internalized in each cell line after 10 min at 37°C, with no observable correlation between neurokinin receptor desensitization and internalization. Measurement of loss of receptor surface sites for cell lines CHO NK1 and CHO NK1NK2 following exposure to 1 µ M substance P also indicated no obvious relationship between the percent desensitization and percent of receptors internalized. Also, two inhibitors of neurokinin 1 receptor internalization, phenylarsine oxide and hyperosmolar sucrose, did not inhibit neurokinin 1 receptor desensitization. The protein kinase inhibitors Ro 31-8220, staurosporine, and Zn²⁺ had no effect on neurokinin 1 receptor desensitization, indicating that the kinases affected by these agents are not rate-limiting in neurokinin 1 receptor desensitization in this system.     

Effect of G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 2 on the Sensitivity of M4 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptors to Agonist-Induced Internalization and Desensitization in NG108-15 Cells

NG108-15 cells express predominantly the M4 subtype of the muscarinic receptor for acetylcholine. Stimulation of these receptors by the agonist carbachol causes an inhibition of cellular adenylyl cyclase and a consequent fall in the intracellular cyclic AMP concentration. Pretreatment of the cells with carbachol caused both internalization and desensitization of the M4 receptor. Overexpression of G protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK) 2 caused an increase in the rate constant for receptor endocytosis (from 0.06 to 0.18 min(-1)) and a decrease in the EC50 for carbachol stimulation of internalization (from 15 to 3 microM). Overexpression of a dominant negative form of GRK2 had more modest effects, reducing the rate constant for endocytosis (from 0.11 to 0.07 min(-1)) and increasing the EC50 for carbachol stimulation of internalization (from 8 to 17 microM). Neither GRK2 nor dominant negative GRK2 overexpression had any effect on the rate constant for receptor recycling following agonist removal. The time course and extent of receptor desensitization in control cells were identical to the corresponding values for receptor internalization, and the rate and extent of desensitization were again increased by GRK2 overexpression. Exposure of the cells to hyperosmolar sucrose (0.6 M) almost completely blocked agonist-induced receptor internalization in both control and GRK2-overexpressing cells. Sucrose treatment also blocked agonist-induced desensitization. We conclude that the internalization and desensitization of the M4 muscarinic receptor in NG108-15 cells can be modulated in response to changes in GRK2 activity and also that internalization plays a key role in desensitization.