Modulation of dopamine D1 receptor binding by neurotensin in the rat striatum

The effect of neurotensin on binding characteristics of dopamine D1 receptors was examined in the rat striatal membranes through radioreceptor assay. Neurotensin or its analogs were added to incubation medium of[³H]SCH 23390 saturation or dopamine/[³H]SCH 23390 inhibition experimental systems. Neurotensin did not modulate D1 antagonist binding but converted a part of D1 agonist high affinity binding sites to a low affinity state. Neurotensin_8–13 had the same potency as neurotensin itself, whereas neurotensin_1–8 had only weak activity in modulating D1 agonist binding. GTP and neurotensin had the same effect on D1 agonist binding. However, when both neurotensin and GTP were added, the result was the same as with either alone.

These data suggest that neurotensin modulates the functional state of D1 receptors probably via a GTP binding protein in the rat striatum.     

A major QTL on chromosome 11 influences psychostimulant and opioid sensitivity in mice

The identification of genes influencing sensitivity to stimulants and opioids is important for determining their mechanism of action and may provide fundamental insights into the genetics of drug abuse. We used a panel of C57BL/6J (B6; recipient)× A/J (donor) chromosome substitution strains (CSSs) to identify quantitative trait loci (QTL) for both open field activity and sensitivity to the locomotor stimulant response to methamphetamine (MA). Mice were injected with saline (days 1 and 2) and MA (day 3; 2 mg/kg i.p.). We analyzed the total distance traveled in the open field for 30 min following each injection. CSS-8, -11 and -16 showed reduced MA-induced locomotor activity relative to B6, whereas CSS-10 and -12 showed increased MA-induced locomotor activity. Further analysis focused on CSS-11 because it was robustly different from B6 following MA injection, but did not differ in activity following saline injection and because it also showed reduced locomotor activity in response to the mu-opioid receptor agonist fentanyl (0.2 mg/kg i.p.). Thus, CSS-11 captures QTLs for the response to both psychostimulants and opioids. Using a B6 × CSS-11 F₂ intercross, we identified a dominant QTL for the MA response on chromosome 11. We used haplotype association mapping of cis expression QTLs and bioinformatic resources to parse among genes within the 95% confidence interval of the chromosome 11 QTL. Identification of the genes underlying QTLs for response to psychostimulants and opioids may provide insights about genetic factors that modulate sensitivity to drugs of abuse.     

Identification of residues involved in neurotensin binding and modeling of the agonist binding site in neurotensin receptor 1

The neurotensin receptor 1 (NTR1) subtype belongs to the family of G protein-coupled receptors and mediates most of the known effects of the neuropeptide including modulation of central dopaminergic transmission. This suggested that nonpeptide agonist mimetics acting at the NTR1 might be helpful in the treatment of Parkinson's disease and schizophrenia. Here, we attempted to define the molecular interactions between neurotensin-(8-13), the pharmacophore of neurotensin, and the rat NTR1. Mutagenesis of the NTR1 identified residues that interact with neurotensin. Structure-activity studies with neurotensin-(8-13) analogs identified the peptide residues that interact with the mutated amino acids in the receptor. By taking these data into account, computer-assisted modeling techniques were used to build a tridimensional model of the neurotensin-(8-13)-binding site in which the N-terminal tetrapeptide of neurotensin-(8-13) fits in the third extracellular loop and the C-terminal dipeptide binds to residues at the junction between the extracellular and transmembrane domains of the receptor. Interestingly, the agonist binding site lies on top of the previously described NTR1-binding site for the nonpeptide neurotensin antagonist SR 48692. Our data provide a basis for understanding at the molecular level the agonist and antagonist binding modes and may help design nonpeptide agonist mimetics of the NTR1.     

Neurotensin: dual roles in psychostimulant and antipsychotic drug responses

Central administration of neurotensin (NT) results in a variety of neurobehavioral effects which, depending upon the administration site, resemble the effects of antipsychotic drugs (APDs) and psychostimulants. All clinically effective APDs exhibit significant affinities for dopamine D(2) receptors, supporting the hypothesis that an increase in dopaminergic tone contributes to schizophrenic symptoms. Psychostimulants increase extracellular dopamine (DA) levels and chronics administration can produce psychotic symptoms over time. APDs and psychostimulants induce Fos and NT expression in distinct striatal subregions, suggesting that changes in gene expression underlie some of their effects. To gain insight into the functions of NT, we analyzed APD and psychostimulant induction of Fos in NT knockout mice and rats pretreated with the NT antagonist SR 48692. In both NT knockout mice and rats pretreated with SR 48692, haloperidol-induced Fos expression was markedly attenuated in the dorsolateral striatum; amphetamine-induced Fos expression was reduced in the medial striatum. These results indicate that NT is required for the activation of specific subpopulations of striatal neurons in distinct striatal subregions in response to both APDs and psychostimulants. This review integrates these new findings with previous evidence implicating NT in both APD and psychostimulant responses.     

Functional domains of the subtype 1 neurotensin receptor (NTS1)

The subtype 1 neurotensin receptor (NTS1) belongs to the family of G protein coupled receptors with seven transmembrane domains and mediates most of the known effects of neurotensin. In the past years, mutagenesis studies have allowed to delineate functional regions of the receptor involved in agonist and antagonist binding, G protein coupling, sodium sensitivity of agonist binding, and agonist-induced receptor internalization. These data are reviewed and discussed in the present paper.     

Agonist-Selective Protection of the Opioid Receptor-Coupled G Proteins from Inactivation by 5''-p-fluorosulphonylbenzoyl Guanosine

The guanine nucleotide analogue, 5'-p-fluorosulphonylbenzoyl guanosine (FSBG), can react covalently with GTP-binding proteins (G proteins). In rat brain membranes, FSBG causes a time-dependent loss of beta,gamma-imido[8-3H]guanosine 5'-triphosphate binding sites. Using 1 mM FSBG, the guanyl nucleotide modulation of opioid agonist binding is abolished, whereas the guanyl nucleotide sensitivity of neurotensin binding is retained. The action of FSBG can be prevented by the presence of opioid agonists, but not the antagonist naloxone. Iodoacetamide treatment of membranes in the presence of agonist, but not antagonist, can attenuate the action of FSBG in blocking guanyl nucleotide modulation of opioid agonist binding. These results suggest that FSBG covalently modifies essential thiol groups, whose exposure to the reagent is modified by agonist occupancy of the receptor, on a species of G protein linked to opioid receptors, but not on a species of G protein linked to neurotensin receptors. Thus, FSBG may have selectivity for the forms of Gi or Go, proteins associated with opioid receptors.     

Neurotensin interacts with carbachol, secretin, and caerulein in the stimulation of the exocrine pancreas of the rat in vitro

In the present investigation the effect of neurotensin on pancreatic secretion of isolated pancreatic lobules from the rat was examined. We found a dose- and time-dependent stimulation of amylase release beginning with a concentration of 10(-9) M neurotensin. This response was potentiated by the cholinergic agonist carbachol, the gastrointestinal peptide secretin, and the CCK analogue caerulein. As we found neurotensin-immunoreactive nerves within the pancreas and as neurotensin-like immunoreactivity is present in the circulation (found previously), neurotensin may well be a further peptide taking part in the regulation of exocrine pancreatic secretion either as a hormone or a neurotransmitter. Neurotensin would then cooperate with cholinergic mechanisms, secretin, and CCK.     

Psychostimulant-like effect of central microinjection of neurotensin on brain stimulation reward

The curve shift method and the brain stimulation reward paradigm were used to dissociate reward and performance changes and determine whether unilateral ICV microinjection of neurotensin (3, 10, and 30 μg/10 μl) produces neuroleptic- or psychostimulant-like effect on a dopamine-dependent behavior. At the highest dose tested, neurotensin potentiated brain stimulation reward, producing a significant time-dependent decrease in frequency threshold. Neurotensin also suppressed maximal rate of responding at every dose tested, suggesting that it was more effective at attenuating performance capability. These results suggest that a centrally acting neurotensin receptor agonist may specifically stimulate dopamine-dependent behaviors, producing psychostimulant-like effect that can be attenuated or masked by a suppression of performance capability.     

Neurotensin Decreases the Affinity of Dopamine D2 Agonist Binding by a G Protein-Independent Mechanism

To examine whether GTP-binding proteins (G proteins) mediate the ability of neurotensin to lower the affinity of dopamine D2 agonist binding, the modulation by neurotensin in vitro of N-[3H]propylnorapomorphine [( 3H]-NPA) binding was investigated following pretreatment with pertussis toxin and N-ethylmaleimide in rat neostriatal membranes. Preincubation with N-ethylmaleimide (100 microM) markedly inhibited pertussis toxin-induced back-ADP ribosylation of three proteins with apparent molecular masses of 41, 40, and 39 kDa, respectively. This inhibition was prevented by adding dithiothreitol (250 microM) during the preincubation. N-Ethylmaleimide increased the KD (180 +/- 30%) and decreased the Bmax (-31 +/- 9%) of [3H]NPA binding sites but did not affect the binding properties of the selective D2 antagonist [3H]raclopride. N-Ethylmaleimide pretreatment did not affect the neurotensin (3 nM)-induced increase in the KD of [3H]NPA binding sites. Pertussin toxin treatment in vivo and in vitro was similarly ineffective. In conclusion, the present study indicates that neurotensin modulation of D2 agonist binding in neostriatal membranes is not mediated by G proteins.     

Genetic identification of AChE as a positive modulator of addiction to the psychostimulant D-amphetamine in zebrafish

Addiction is a complex maladaptive behavior involving alterations in several neurotransmitter networks. In mammals, psychostimulants trigger elevated extracellular levels of dopamine, which can be modulated by central cholinergic transmission. Which elements of the cholinergic system might be targeted for drug addiction therapies remains unknown. The rewarding properties of drugs of abuse are central for the development of addictive behavior and are most commonly measured by means of the conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm. We demonstrate here that adult zebrafish show robust CPP induced by the psychostimulant D-amphetamine. We further show that this behavior is dramatically reduced upon genetic impairment of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) function in ache/+ mutants, without involvement of concomitant defects in exploratory activity, learning, and visual performance. Our observations demonstrate that the cholinergic system modulates drug-induced reward in zebrafish, and identify genetically AChE as a promising target for systemic therapies against addiction to psychostimulants. More generally, they validate the zebrafish model to study the effect of developmental mutations on the molecular neurobiology of addiction in vertebrates.     

Involvement of serotoninergic brain structures in the mechanisms of neurotensin effect on passive avoidance in rats

The purpose of the research was to reveal the features of neurotensin (administered in substantia nigra or dorsal raphe nucleus) effect on recall of passive avoidance reactions in rats. It was shown that the effect of neurotensin injected into the substantia nigra was characterized by a sharp reduction of passive avoidance reactions. On the contrary, injection of the substance in the dorsal raphe nucleus led to an intensification of these reactions and delay of their extinction. The effects of microinjections of serotonin 1A receptor agonist, 8-hydroxy-dipropylaminotetralin (8-OH-DPAT), into the mentioned brain structures was similar to that of neurotensin. Changes in the content of serotonin and its metabolite 5- hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) in the caudate nucleus corresponded to various behavioral effects. The conclusion was made that neurotensin effect on the passive avoidance behavior is related to regulation of emotional state of animals mediated by its action on the function of the serotoninergic brain structures.     

Receptor trafficking via the perinuclear recycling compartment accompanied by cell division is necessary for permanent neurotensin cell sensitization and leads to chronic mitogen-activated protein kinase activation

Most G protein-coupled receptors are internalized after interaction with their respective ligand, a process that subsequently contributes to cell desensitization, receptor endocytosis, trafficking, and finally cell resensitization. Although cellular mechanisms leading to cell desensitization have been widely studied, those responsible for cell resensitization are still poorly understood. We examined here the traffic of the high affinity neurotensin receptor (NT1 receptor) following prolonged exposure to high agonist concentration. Fluorescence and confocal microscopy of Chinese hamster ovary, human neuroblastoma (CHP 212), and murine neuroblastoma (N1E-115) cells expressing green fluorescent protein-tagged NT1 receptor revealed that under prolonged treatment with saturating concentrations of neurotensin (NT) agonist, NT1 receptor and NT transiently accumulated in the perinuclear recycling compartment (PNRC). During this cellular event, cell surface receptors remained markedly depleted as detected by both confocal microscopy and (125)I-NT binding assays. In dividing cells, we observed that following prolonged NT agonist stimulation, NT1 receptors were removed from the PNRC, accumulated in dispersed vesicles inside the cytoplasm, and subsequently reappeared at the cell surface. This NT binding recovery allowed for constant cell sensitization and led to a chronic activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases p42 and p44. Under these conditions, the constant activation of NT1 receptor generates an oncogenic regulation. These observations support the potent role for neuropeptides, such as NT, in cancer progression.     

Genetic identification of AChE as a positive modulator of addiction to the psychostimulant D‐amphetamine in zebrafish

Addiction is a complex maladaptive behavior involving alterations in several neurotransmitter networks. In mammals, psychostimulants trigger elevated extracellular levels of dopamine, which can be modulated by central cholinergic transmission. Which elements of the cholinergic system might be targeted for drug addiction therapies remains unknown. The rewarding properties of drugs of abuse are central for the development of addictive behavior and are most commonly measured by means of the conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm. We demonstrate here that adult zebrafish show robust CPP induced by the psychostimulant D‐amphetamine. We further show that this behavior is dramatically reduced upon genetic impairment of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) function in ache/+ mutants, without involvement of concomitant defects in exploratory activity, learning, and visual performance. Our observations demonstrate that the cholinergic system modulates drug‐induced reward in zebrafish, and identify genetically AChE as a promising target for systemic therapies against addiction to psychostimulants. More generally, they validate the zebrafish model to study the effect of developmental mutations on the molecular neurobiology of addiction in vertebrates. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Neurobiol, 2006     

Is the treatment with psychostimulants in children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder harmful for the dopaminergic system?

A major concern regarding psychostimulant medication (amphetamine and methylphenidate) in the treatment of children and adolescents with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are the potential adverse effects to the developing brain, particularly in regard to dopaminergic brain function. The present review focuses on the pharmacology of these psychostimulants, their mode of action in the human brain and their potential neurotoxic effects to the developing brain in animals, particularly concerning DA brain function. The potential clinical significance of these findings for the treatment of ADHD in children and adolescents is discussed. Studies on sensitization to psychostimulants’ rewarding effects, which is a process expected to increase the risk of substance abuse in humans, are not included. The available findings in non-human primates support the notion that the administration of amphetamine and methylphenidate with procedures simulating clinical treatment conditions does not lead to long-term adverse effects in regard to development, neurobiology or behaviour as related to the central dopaminergic system.     

Interactions between neurotensin receptors and G proteins

Three neurotensin (NT) receptors have been cloned to date, two of which, NTS1 and NTS2, belong to the family of seven transmembrane domain receptors coupled to G proteins (GPCRs). NTS1 and NTS2 may activate multiple signal transduction pathways, involving several G proteins. However, whereas NT acts as an agonist towards all NTS1-mediated pathways, this peptide may exert either agonist or antagonist activities, depending on the NTS2-mediated pathway in question. Studies on these receptors reinforce the concept of independence between multiple signals potentially mediated through a single GPCR, generating a wide diversity of functional responses depending on the host cell and the ligand.     

Neurotensin decreases high affinity [3H]-ouabain binding to cerebral cortex membranes

Previous work from this laboratory showed the ability of neurotensin to inhibit synaptosomal membrane Na(+), K(+)-ATPase activity, the effect being blocked by SR 48692, a non-peptidic antagonist for high affinity neurotensin receptor (NTS1) [López Ordieres and Rodríguez de Lores Arnaiz 2000; 2001]. To further study neurotensin interaction with Na(+), K(+)-ATPase, peptide effect on high affinity [(3)H]-ouabain binding was studied in cerebral cortex membranes. It was observed that neurotensin modified binding in a dose-dependent manner, leading to 80% decrease with 1 × 10(-4)M concentration. On the other hand, the single addition of 1 × 10(-6)M, 1 × 10(-5)M and 1 × 10(-4)M SR 48692 (Sanofi-Aventis, U.S., Inc.) decreased [(3)H]-ouabain binding (in %) to 87 ± 16; 74 ± 16 and 34 ± 17, respectively. Simultaneous addition of neurotensin and SR 48692 led to additive or synergic effects. Partial NTS2 agonist levocabastine inhibited [(3)H]-ouabain binding likewise. Saturation assays followed by Scatchard analyses showed that neurotensin increased K(d) value whereas failed to modify B(max) value, indicating a competitive type interaction of the peptide at Na(+), K(+)-ATPase ouabain site. At variance, SR 48692 decreased B(max) value whereas it did not modify K(d) value. [(3)H]-ouabain binding was also studied in cerebral cortex membranes obtained from rats injected i. p. 30 min earlier with 100 μg and 250 μg/kg SR 48692. It was observed that the 250 μg/kg SR 48692 dose led to 19% decrease in basal [(3)H]-ouabain binding. After SR 48692 treatments, addition of 1 × 10(-6)M led to additive or synergic effect. Results suggested that [(3)H]-ouabain binding inhibition by neurotensin hardly involves NTS1 receptor.     

The identification of nonpeptide neurotensin receptor partial agonists from the potent antagonist SR48692 using a calcium mobilization assay

In a search for nonpeptide agonists for the neurotensin receptor (NTR1), we replaced the adamantyl amino acid moiety found in the antagonist SR48692 (1a) with leucine and related α-alkylamino acids found in peptide agonists. When tested in a calcium mobilization assay, we found that both d- and l-leucine confer partial agonist activity to the pyrazole scaffold with the l-enantiomer (3a) providing a significantly greater response. A brief SAR survey demonstrated that the observed agonist activity was resilient to changes made to the dimethoxyaryl ring in 3a. The resulting compounds were less potent relative to 3a but showed greater agonist responses. The partial agonist activity was extinguished when the chloroquinoline ring was replaced with naphthalene. Thus, while l-leucine appears to possess a powerful agonist directing affect for the NTR1 receptor, its presence alone in the molecular architecture is not sufficient to insure agonist behavior.     

β-Lactotensin derived from bovine β-lactoglobulin exhibits anxiolytic-like activity as an agonist for neurotensin NTS(2) receptor via activation of dopamine D(1) receptor in mice

β-Lactotensin (His-Ile-Arg-Leu) is a bioactive peptide derived from bovine milk β-lactoglobulin, acting as a natural agonist for neurotensin receptors. We found that β-lactotensin exhibited anxiolytic-like activity in an elevated plus-maze test after its intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration in mice. β-Lactotensin was also orally active. The anxiolytic-like activity of β-lactotensin after i.p. administration was blocked by levocabastine, an antagonist for the neurotensin NTS(2) receptor. β-Lactotensin had anxiolytic-like activity in wild-type but not Ntsr2-knockout mice. β-Lactotensin increased intracellular Ca(2+) flux in glial cells derived from wild-type mice but not Ntsr2 knockout mice. These results suggest that β-lactotensin acts as an NTS(2) receptor agonist having anxiolytic-like activity. The anxiolytic-like activity of β-lactotensin was also blocked by SCH23390 and SKF83566, antagonists for dopamine D(1) receptor, but not by raclopride, an antagonist for D(2) receptor. Taken together, β-lactotensin may exhibit anxiolytic-like activity via NTS(2) receptor followed by D(1) receptor.