Stent Thrombosis is the Primary Cause of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction following Coronary Stent Implantation: A Five Year Follow-Up of the SORT OUT II Study

Background

The widespread use of coronary stents has exposed a growing population to the risk of stent thrombosis, but the importance in terms of risk of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions (STEMIs) remains unclear.

Methods

We studied five years follow-up data for 2,098 all-comer patients treated with coronary stents in the randomized SORT OUT II trial (mean age 63.6 yrs. 74.8% men). Patients who following stent implantation were readmitted with STEMI were included and each patient was categorized ranging from definite- to ruled-out stent thrombosis according to the Academic Research Consortium definitions. Multivariate logistic regression was performed on selected covariates to assess odds ratios (ORs) for definite stent thrombosis.

Results

85 patients (4.1%), mean age 62.7 years, 77.1% men, were admitted with a total of 96 STEMIs, of whom 60 (62.5%) had definite stent thrombosis. Notably, definite stent thrombosis was more frequent in female than male STEMI patients (81.8% vs. 56.8%, p = 0.09), and in very late STEMIs (p = 0.06). Female sex (OR 3.53 [1.01–12.59]) and clopidogrel (OR 4.43 [1.03–19.01]) was associated with increased for definite stent thrombosis, whereas age, time since stent implantation, use of statins, initial PCI urgency (STEMI [primary PCI], NSTEMI/unstable angina [subacute PCI] or stable angina [elective PCI]), and glucose-lowering agents did not seem to influence risk of stent thrombosis.

Conclusion

In a contemporary cohort of coronary stented patients, stent thrombosis was evident in more than 60% of subsequent STEMIs.     

Stent thrombosis in real-world patients: a comparison of drug-eluting with bare metal stents

BackgroundAlthough the introduction of drugeluting stents (DES) has been associated with an impressive reduction in target vessel revascularisation, there has been concern about the safety profile. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of stent thrombosis in real-world patients and evaluate the contribution of drug-eluting stents. Methods A prospective observational cohort study was conducted at a high-volume centre in Utrecht, the Netherlands. All patients who underwent a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between 1 January and 31 December 2005 were evaluated. The patients were pretreated with aspirin and clopidogrel, which was continued for six months in bare metal stents (BMS) and 12 months in DES. ResultsIn 2005, 1309 patients underwent a percutaneous coronary intervention procedure with stent implantation. After a median follow-up of nine months, 1.8% (n=23) of the patients had suffered from stent thrombosis. Two cases could be attributed to incorrect use of antiplatelet agents. In 8/23 cases, a technical reason was found such as an unrecognised dissection or stent underexpansion. The timing of stent thrombosis was acute in 1/23 patients, subacute in 20/23 patients and late in 2/23 patients. In both cases of late stent thrombosis, a BMS had been used. There were no differences in stent thrombosis rates between DES and BMS (1.4 vs. 1.9%, ns.). This is remarkable since DES were used in more complex and longer lesions. ConclusionThe use of DES in routine daily practice does not appear to be associated with a higher rate of stent thrombosis than BMS. (Neth Heart J 2007;15:382-6).     

高负荷剂量氯吡格雷联合替罗非班在非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合 征患者经皮冠状动脉介入中的应用

目的：探讨高负荷剂量氯吡格雷联合替罗非班在高危非ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征（acute coronary syndrome,ACS） 患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗（percutaneous coronary intervention,PCI）中的作用及安全性。方法：入选208 例高危非ST 段抬高型 ACS患者,根据PCI术前氯吡格雷负荷量不同,随机分为观察组和对照组。对照组：112 例,以氯吡格雷300 mg+ 替罗非班(用法同 观察组)治疗,观察组：96例,以氯吡格雷600 mg +替罗非班0.4 滋g/(kg·min)在30 min 内静脉注射。继以0.1 g/(kg·min)由微量泵 静脉持续泵入至手术后36 h,分别测定两组最大血小板聚集率(MPAR)变化、PCI 术后TIMI心肌灌注分级(TMPG);随访住院期间 和30 d内不良心血管事件和出血事件。结果：两组临床情况、PCI前负荷剂量氯吡格雷给药时间、支架置入数目比较差异无统计 学意义(P>0.05);用药后2 h、6 h、术后24 h两组MPAR均较用药前明显降低(P<0.05);用药后6 h两组MPAR 均低于用药后2 h (P<0.05);用药后2 h时观察组MPAR 低于对照组(P<0.05)。PCI术后TMPG 3级获得率观察组高于对照组(P<0.05);30 d内复合心 血管事件发生率、出血并发症两组比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论：PCI术前负荷氯吡格雷600 mg可以更有效、更迅速地 抑制患者的MPAR,联合应用替罗非班时仍可改善心肌灌注,且安全可行。     

血栓弹力图指导支架内血栓后不稳定心绞痛治疗1 例及文献复习

目的:探讨在血栓弹力图监测血小板抑制率的情况下,调整氯吡格雷及阿司匹林用量,治疗冠心病、PCI术后支架内再发血栓患者的临床意义。方法:报告中国人民解放军总医院1例支架内亚急性血栓患者的临床资料并复习相关文献,对其临床表现、诊断、在血栓弹力图指导下的治疗进行分析。结果:1例支架内亚急性血栓患者经治疗病情好转出院,出院后继续调整氯吡格雷及阿司匹林用量,达到满意血小板抑制率,患者症状消失。结论:冠状动脉介入治疗后发生支架内血栓的患者,应用血栓弹力图指导氯吡格雷及阿司匹林用量,可达到令人满意的血小板抑制率,并防止出血情况发生。     

高负荷剂量氯吡格雷联合替罗非班在非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入中的应用

目的：探讨高负荷剂量氯吡格雷联合替罗非班在高危非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征（acute coronarysyndrome,ACS）患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗（percutaneous coronary intervention,PCI）中的作用及安全性。方法：入选208例高危非ST段抬高型ACS患者,根据PCI术前氯吡格雷负荷量不同,随机分为观察组和对照组。对照组：112例,以氯吡格雷300 mg＋替罗非班（用法同观察组）治疗,观察组：96例,以氯吡格雷600 mg＋替罗非班0.4μg/（kg·min）在30 min内静脉注射。继以0.1 g/（kg·min）由微量泵静脉持续泵入至手术后36 h,分别测定两组最大血小板聚集率（MPAR）变化、PCI术后TIMI心肌灌注分级（TMPG）;随访住院期间和30 d内不良心血管事件和出血事件。结果：两组临床情况、PCI前负荷剂量氯吡格雷给药时间、支架置入数目比较差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）;用药后2 h、6 h、术后24 h两组MPAR均较用药前明显降低（P〈0.05）;用药后6 h两组MPAR均低于用药后2 h（P〈0.05）;用药后2 h时观察组MPAR低于对照组（P〈0.05）。PCI术后TMPG 3级获得率观察组高于对照组（P〈0.05）;30 d内复合心血管事件发生率、出血并发症两组比较差异均无统计学意义（P〉0.05）。结论：PCI术前负荷氯吡格雷600 mg可以更有效、更迅速地抑制患者的MPAR,联合应用替罗非班时仍可改善心肌灌注,且安全可行。     

Comparative study of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in therapeutic effect of acute myocardial infarction patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

ObjectivesComparison of Ticagrelor vs clopidogrel in antiplatelet therapeutic effect of acute myocardial infarction patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.MethodsThe study focused on 2000 acute myocardial infarction patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in our hospital from January 2013 to December 2015. To reduce the formation of acute stent thrombosis caused by clopidogrel resistance, we had two options, one was to double the dosage of clopidogrel, and the other was to substitute ticagrelor for clopidogrel. Based on random number table method, the 2000 patients were divided into experimental group and control group, each containing 1,000 patients. The patients in experimental group took 180 mg ticagrelor before PCI and 90 mg ticagrelor twice a day after PCI (Gu, 2016). In contrast, the patients control group took 600 mg clopidogrel before PCI and 150 mg clopidogrel once a day after PCI. Both groups were drawn 2.7 ml of fasting venous blood for platelet aggregation rate test before PCI and 2 h, 24 h, 7 days after PCI respectively. Turbidimetric method was used to measure the ADP-induced platelet aggregation rate and observe change of platelet aggregation rate and success rate. Incidence of liver and kidney malfunction and adverse actions were monitored. All patients accepted a 6-month of follow-up examination to record and compare incidences of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events. The statistical results of both groups are analyzed and compared.ResultsThe platelet aggregation rate of experimental group before PCI and 2 h, 24 h, 7 days after PCI was 59.71% ± 7.24%, 59.20% ± 7.70%, 48.66% ± 7.80% and 43.39% ± 8.28%; The control group was 58.04% ± 5.61%, 56.25% ± 6.02%, 55.68% ± 3.14%, 53.94% ± 5.30%; Comparing the platelet aggregation rate of different time, P was less than 0.05. The success rate of platelet aggregation of experimental group and control group was 80.56% and 46.86% respectively. There were significant differences between the two groups and the P was less than .05. The postoperative serum creatinine level of experimental group was higher than that in the control group (P < .05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the experimental group was significantly lower than that of the control group. There were significant differences between the two groups and the difference was of statistical significance (P < .05). According to the 5-month follow-up examination: the incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events in experimental group was 2.60% (52/2000) ,while the control group was 13.00% (260/2000) . There were significant differences between the two groups and the difference was of statistical significance (P < .05).ConclusionsCompared with clopidogrel, ticagrelor can achieve better n antiplatelet effect for patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). It can effectively reduce the incidence of postoperative adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events and control the rate of adverse reactions within the acceptable range.     

Safety of Low-Dose Aspirin in Endovascular Treatment for Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis

Objectives

To evaluate the safety of low-dose aspirin plus clopidogrel versus high-dose aspirin plus clopidogrel in prevention of vascular risk within 90 days of duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients treated with intracranial endovascular treatment.

Methods

From January 2012 to December 2013, this prospective and observational study enrolled 370 patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis of ≥70% with poor collateral undergoing intracranial endovascular treatment. Antiplatelet therapy consists of aspirin, at a low-dose of 100 mg or high-dose of 300 mg daily; clopidogrel, at a dose of 75 mg daily for 5 days before endovascular treatment. The dual antiplatelet therapy continued for 90 days after intervention. The study endpoints include acute thrombosis, subacute thrombosis, stroke or death within 90 days after intervention.

Results

Two hundred and seventy three patients received low-dose aspirin plus clopidogrel and 97 patients received high-dose aspirin plus clopidogrel before intracranial endovascular treatment. Within 90 days after intervention, there were 4 patients (1.5%) with acute thrombosis, 5 patients (1.8%) with subacute thrombosis, 17 patients (6.2%) with stroke, and 2 death (0.7%) in low-dose aspirin group, compared with no patient (0%) with acute thrombosis, 2 patient (2.1%) with subacute thrombosis, 6 patients (6.2%) with stroke, and 2 death (2.1%) in high-dose aspirin group, and there were no significant difference in all study endpoints between two groups.

Conclusion

Low-dose aspirin plus clopidogrel is comparative in safety with high-dose aspirin plus clopidogrel within 90 days of duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients treated with intracranial endovascular treatment.     

In-hospital resource utilization in coronary angioplasty: the impact of increased coronary stenting rates and antiplatelet therapy

BACKGROUND: The technique of coronary stenting has evolved over recent years, with improved stent technology and effective antiplatelet therapies to prevent stent thrombosis. In Europe, reductions in stent and equipment costs have resulted from increased market competition. The impact of these changes on the in-hospital procedural cost of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the current clinical setting is not known. METHODS: We compared the initial equipment and pharmaceutical costs of one hundred consecutive, unselected patients undergoing PCI in 1998 to a similar population who underwent PCI in 1994. RESULTS: Similar patient characteristics were noted, yet more complex disease (multivessel, AHA type B2/C lesions) was treated in the 1998 population. The stent utilization rate (83% vs 15%, p < 0.0001) and use of intravenous and/or oral antiplatelet therapy (abciximab, ticlopidine) (64% vs 4%, p < 0.0001) was higher in 1998. Similar angiographic success was achieved in each group with low complication rates. Mean hospital stay was reduced in the 1998 group (2.6 +/- 2.8 vs 4.3 +/- 3.8 days, p < 0.001). Repeat PCI was required more frequently in the 1994 population (26% vs 9%, p < 0.001). Overall there was no significant difference in the mean equipment cost between the two groups ( pound 1551 vs pound 1422, p=ns). CONCLUSION: Despite the widespread use of coronary stenting and antiplatelet therapies there appears to be no difference in current in-hospital equipment costs for PCI compared to 1994. Improved clinical outcomes in the 1998 population imply that stenting is a cost-effective therapy.     

替格瑞洛在急性冠脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术后的应用价值

目的:评价替格瑞洛在急性冠脉综合征(acute coronary syndrome,ACS)患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(percutaneous coronary intervention,PCI)术后的应用价值。方法:将我院收治的565例成功行PCI的急性冠脉综合征(acute coronary syndrome,ACS)患者随机分为2组:氯吡格雷组253例,术后口服氯吡格雷75 mg、QD;替格瑞洛组312例,术后口服替格瑞洛首剂180 mg,维持量90mg、BID。两组患者术后常规口服阿司匹林100 mg、QD。研究主要终点为主要不良心血管事件(major adverse cardiovascular events,MACE),包括全因死亡、靶血管血运重建和脑梗塞;次要终点为TIMI主要出血(定义为血红蛋白下降50 g/L或颅内出血有关的临床显著出血事件)。结果:565例患者平均随访12个月,替格瑞洛组MACE发生率低于氯吡格雷组(3.8%vs.8.7%,P0.05),两组TIMI主要出血事件发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(2.9%vs.3.2%,P0.05)。结论:替格瑞洛能明显减少PCI术后主要不良心血管事件,并不增加主要出血。     

Serotonin antagonism improves platelet inhibition in clopidogrel low-responders after coronary stent placement: an in vitro pilot study

Increased residual platelet reactivity remains a burden for coronary artery disease (CAD) patients who received a coronary stent and do not respond sufficiently to treatment with acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel. We hypothesized that serotonin antagonism reduces high on-treatment platelet reactivity. Whole blood impedance aggregometry was performed with arachidonic acid (AA, 0.5 mM) and adenosine diphosphate (ADP, 6.5 μM) in addition to different concentrations of serotonin (1-100 μM) in whole blood from 42 CAD patients after coronary stent placement and 10 healthy subjects. Serotonin increased aggregation dose-dependently in CAD patients who responded to clopidogrel treatment: After activation with ADP, aggregation increased from 33.7 ± 1.3% to 40.9 ± 2.0% in the presence of 50 μM serotonin (p<0.05) and to 48.2 ± 2.0% with 100 μM serotonin (p<0.001). The platelet serotonin receptor antagonist ketanserin decreased ADP-induced aggregation significantly in clopidogrel low-responders (from 59.9 ± 3.1% to 37.4 ± 3.5, p<0.01), but not in clopidogrel responders. These results were confirmed with light transmission aggregometry in platelet-rich plasma in a subset of patients. Serotonin hence increased residual platelet reactivity in patients who respond to clopidogrel after coronary stent placement. In clopidogrel low-responders, serotonin receptor antagonism improved platelet inhibition, almost reaching responder levels. This may justify further investigation of triple antiplatelet therapy with anti-serotonergic agents.     

Efficacy and safety of coronary stenting during diagnostic coronary angiography in patients with stable angina

The authors assessed the in-hospital and long-term (up to 6 months) results of coronary stenting conducted just after diagnostic coronarography during a common procedure in patients with stable angina pectoris on effort. The 2001-2002 study included 2277 patients. The clinical indications for catheterization were Functional Classes II-IV stable angina on effort in 83 % of patients and silent ischemia in 17%. The study excluded patients with previous coronarography, acute coronary syndrome on admission, renal failure, left ventricular ejection fraction <30%, and left trunk stenosis. All the patients received aspirin and clopidogrel before catheterization. RESULTS: 57% of patients had multivessel disease; full revascularization was performed in 59% of the patients with multivessel disease. The coronary intervention was successful in 100% of cases. Significant in-hospital events (myocardial infarction without Q wave) were in 1.2% of cases. The mean length of hospital stay was 2.9 +/- 2.4 days. The rate of stent thrombosis for as long as 30 days was 0.2%. Recurrent angina and/or positive exercise tests were in 12% during 6 months. CONCLUSION: immediate stening is effective and safe in most patients with stable angina during diagnostic catheterization. It does not increase immediate and late complications.     

Paraoxonase-1 is a major determinant of clopidogrel efficacy

Clinical efficacy of the antiplatelet drug clopidogrel is hampered by its variable biotransformation into the active metabolite. The variability in the clinical response to clopidogrel treatment has been attributed to genetic factors, but the specific genes and mechanisms underlying clopidogrel bioactivation remain unclear. Using in vitro metabolomic profiling techniques, we identified paraoxonase-1 (PON1) as the crucial enzyme for clopidogrel bioactivation, with its common Q192R polymorphism determining the rate of active metabolite formation. We tested the clinical relevance of the PON1 Q192R genotype in a population of individuals with coronary artery disease who underwent stent implantation and received clopidogrel therapy. PON1 QQ192 homozygous individuals showed a considerably higher risk than RR192 homozygous individuals of stent thrombosis, lower PON1 plasma activity, lower plasma concentrations of active metabolite and lower platelet inhibition. Thus, we identified PON1 as a key factor for the bioactivation and clinical activity of clopidogrel. These findings have therapeutic implications and may be exploited to prospectively assess the clinical efficacy of clopidogrel.     

替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷对急性冠脉综合征患者经皮冠脉动脉介入术后血小板抑制效果的比较

目的:比较替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷对急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者经皮冠脉动脉介入术(PCI)后血小板的抑制效果。方法:选择2014年3月至8月在我院经替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林治疗的ACS患者85例(替格瑞洛组),按性别、年龄2:1匹配原则随机抽取同一时间服用氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林治疗患者170例(氯吡格雷组)为研究对象,两组患者均行PCI治疗,并于服用抗血小板药物负荷剂量2天(PCI术后)进行血栓弹力图(TEG)检测,观察和比较两组患者经ADP途径及经AA途径的血小板抑制率。结果:氯吡格雷组和替格瑞洛组经ADP途径的血小板抑制率分别为(66.60±25.57)%、(82.10±18.87)%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。氯吡格雷组ADP抑制率50%患者占总人数的29.4%,替格瑞洛组ADP抑制率50%的患者占总人数的10.6%,两组差异有统计学意义(P0.05),氯吡格雷组ADP抑制率75%者占总人数的41.8%;而替格瑞洛组ADP抑制率75%的患者占总人数的69.4%,两组抑制率差异也存在统计学意义(P0.05)。氯吡格雷组和替格瑞洛组经AA途径的血小板抑制率分别为(88.70±23.89)%、(90.32±18.09)%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:替格瑞洛对ACS患者PCI术后血小板的抑制作用优于氯吡格雷。     

High-Maintenance-Dose Clopidogrel in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Despite routine use of clopidogrel, adverse cardiovascular events recur among some patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). To optimize antiplatelet therapies, we performed a meta-analysis to quantify the efficacy of high versus standard-maintenance-dose clopidogrel in these patients.

Methods

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing high (>75 mg) and standard maintenance doses of clopidogrel in patients undergoing PCI were included. The primary efficacy and safety end-points were major adverse cardiovascular/cerebrovascular events (MACE/MACCE) and major bleeding. The secondary end-points were other ischemic and bleeding adverse effects. The pooled odds ratio (OR) for each outcome was estimated.

Results

14 RCTs with 4424 patients were included. Compared with standard-maintenance-dose clopidogrel, high-maintenance-dose clopidogrel significantly reduced the incidence of MACE/MACCE (OR 0.60; 95% CI 0.43 to 0.83), stent thrombosis (OR 0.56; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.99) and target vessel revascularization (OR 0.38; 95% CI 0.20 to 0.74), without significant decrease of the risk of cardiovascular death (OR 0.92; 95% CI 0.74 to 1.13) and myocardial infarction (OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.51 to 1.33). For safety outcomes, it did not significantly increase the risk of major bleeding (OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.41 to 1.32), minor bleeding (OR 1.29; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.66) and any bleeding (OR 1.14; 95% CI 0.91 to 1.43).

Conclusion

High-maintenance-dose clopidogrel reduces the recurrence of most ischemic events in patients post-PCI without increasing the risk of bleeding complications.     

血尿酸水平对ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者急诊经皮冠状动脉介入术后长期预后的影响

目的:探讨血尿酸(SUA)水平对行急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者长期预后的影响。方法:连续纳入2012年1月至2012年12月在我院诊断为STEMI并成功行急诊PCI的患者275例,按照入院时SUA水平三分位法将患者分成A组91例(低尿酸)、B组90例(中尿酸)、C组94例(高尿酸)。收集所有患者临床基线资料,包括吸烟史、既往病史、血液学指标及冠脉造影结果等,观察三组患者急诊PCI术后住院期间及术后6年随访期间主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的发生情况,logistic回归分析SUA水平对患者近期及长期预后的危险因素。结果:C组男性和心律失常病史比例明显高于A、B组(P0.05)。同时,三组患者AIP、Scr、BUN、SUA、APTT组间比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。C组患者三支血管病变比例明显高于A、B组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。三组患者住院期间心力衰竭、支架内血栓形成、总MACE比例组间比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。三组患者术后6年心力衰竭、心绞痛、支架内再狭窄/闭塞和总MACE比例组间比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。Logistic回归显示年龄、吸烟史、TC、SUA、血栓抽吸术、IABP应用是住院期间MACE发生的危险因素(P0.05),AIP、SUA、APTT、IABP应用是PCI术后6年随访期间MACE发生的危险因素(P0.05)。结论:成功行急诊PCI的STEMI患者,SUA水平是其近期及长期预后的独立危险因素,SUA水平升高者长期MACE发生率增加。     

Rapid oral desensitisation procedure in clopidogrel hypersensitivity

We describe a patient who developed generalised pruritis with oedema and rash two weeks after she had started taking clopidogrel following coronary stent implantation. In the absence of other likely causative agents, clopidogrel hypersensitivity was probable. She was treated with a rapid oral desensitisation procedure, after which a daily dose of 75 mg clopidogrel was well tolerated. No major adverse events occurred during a follow-up period of eight months. Oral desensitisation in clopidogrel hypersensitivity seems to be a safe method to reduce the risk of coronary stent thrombosis. (Neth Heart J 2008;16:21-3).     

The impact of adjunctive eptifibatide therapy with percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction

The role of small molecules anti-glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa pharmacotherapy during acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has not been established. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients sustaining AMI who underwent emergent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and who were distinguished by the use of the anti-GP IIb/IIIa agent eptifibatide. We studied a consecutive group of 216 patients who underwent PCI for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction and compared the outcomes of patients who received eptifibatide just prior and following the procedure (n=167) to those who were not on anti GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors (n=49). On average, patients treated using eptifibatide were younger and were more likely to be men, hypertensive, and smokers. The eptifibatide treated patients were less likely to have diabetes and renal failure and had worse angiographic characteristics. There were no significant differences between the groups in any of the clinical outcomes, including the composite endpoint (e.g. death, MI, repeat revascularization) and the rate of sub-acute stent thrombosis. Nonetheless, there was a non-significant trend towards lower 30 day mortality in the eptifibatide group (4.8% versus 12%, P=0.09). We concluded that in our comparative study of periprocedural administration of eptifibatide during emergent AMI angioplasty, there was a non-significant trend towards better short-term survival among eptifibatide treated patients although the composite endpoint did not differ between patients distinguished by the use of anti GP IIb/IIIa small molecule pharmacotherapy.     

Reduced number of cardiovascular events and increased cost-effectiveness by genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions in the Netherlands

Aim

This study explores clinical outcome in cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19)-related poor metaboliser patients treated with either clopidogrel or prasugrel after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and investigates whether this could be cost-effective.

Methods and results

This single-centre, observational study included 3260 patients scheduled for elective PCI between October 2010 and June 2013 and followed for adverse cardiovascular events until October 2014. Post PCI, CYP2C19 poor metaboliser patients were treated with clopidogrel or prasugrel, in addition to aspirin. In total, 32 poor metabolisers were treated with clopidogrel and 41 with prasugrel. The number of adverse cardiovascular events, defined as death from cardiovascular cause, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, every second visit to the catheterisation room for re-PCI in the same artery, or stroke, within 1.5 years of PCI, was significantly higher in the CYP2C19 poor metaboliser group treated with clopidogrel (n = 10, 31?%) compared with the poor metaboliser group treated with prasugrel (n = 2, 5?%) (p = 0.003). Costs per gained quality-adjusted life years (QALY) were estimated, showing that genotype-guided post-PCI treatment with prasugrel could be cost-effective with less than € 10,000 per gained QALY.

Conclusion

This study provides evidence that for CYP2C19-related poor metabolisers prasugrel may be more effective than clopidogrel to prevent major adverse cardiovascular events after PCI and this approach could be cost-effective.