Purine receptors: GPCR structure and agonist design

An integrated approach to the study of drug-receptor interactions has been applied to adenosine receptors (ARs) and P2Y nucleotide receptors. This approach includes probing the receptor structure through site-directed mutagenesis and molecular modeling, in concert with altering the structure of the agonist ligands. Goals of this structural approach are to generate a testable hypothesis for location of the binding site and subsequently to enable the rational design of new agonists and antagonists. In this manner, receptor subtype selectivity has been increased, and agonists have been converted into partial agonists and antagonists. An approach to receptor engineering (neoceptors) has been explored, in which synthetic small molecule agonists (neoligands) are specifically tailored to activate only receptors in which the putative binding sites have been modified. This orthogonal approach to receptor activation, intended for eventual gene therapy, has been demonstrated for A3 and A2A ARs.     

Positive effects of allosteric modulators on the binding properties and the function of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors

Data are reviewed indicating that allosteric modulators can enhance the affinities of muscarinic receptors for their antagonists and agonists, that the enhancement of the affinity for agonists is relevant functionally, and that the allosterically induced conformational change also affects the interaction between the receptors and the G proteins.     

Dimer-based model for heptaspanning membrane receptors

The existence of intramembrane receptor-receptor interactions for heptaspanning membrane receptors is now fully accepted, but a model considering dimers as the basic unit that binds to two ligand molecules is lacking. Here, we propose a two-state-dimer model in which the ligand-induced conformational changes from one component of the dimer are communicated to the other. Our model predicts cooperativity in binding, which is relevant because the other current models fail to address this phenomenon satisfactorily. Our two-state-dimer model also predicts the variety of responses elicited by full or partial agonists, neutral antagonists and inverse agonists. This model can aid our understanding of the operation of heptaspanning receptors and receptor channels, and, potentially, be important for improving the treatment of cardiovascular, neurological and neuropsychyatric diseases.     

Dopamine: receptors and clinical applications

Dopamine (DA) receptors have been divided into two subtypes: DA1 receptors which subserve vasodilation in renal, mesenteric, coronary, and cerebral vascular beds, and DA2 receptors which when activated cause inhibition of release of norepinephrine in sympathetic nerve endings. The subdivisions were made on the basis of differences in chemical structure and potency series of agonists and antagonists for the two receptor subtypes. Agonists and antagonists are now available which selectively act on DA1 or DA2 receptors. The clinical use of DA, DA pro-drugs, and selective DA agonists is discussed with particular emphasis on the treatment of congestive heart failure and hypertension. Finally, data are presented concerning possible relationships between peripheral DA1 and DA2 receptors and DA receptors classified in the central nervous system.     

The character of the muscarinic receptors in different regions of the rat brain

The binding characteristics of muscarinic receptors have been critically examined in six regions of the rat brain. The binding curves of antagonists are similar for all six areas but the binding curves of agonists show large differences. It is shown that in all regions there are three classes of receptors with similar binding characteristics but that these are present in different proportions. The binding constants to the three receptor types of a range of agonists were examined and evidence was produced in support of the theory that the subclasses of brain receptors are due to a single receptor subunit subject to different conformational constraints.     

Molecular pharmacology of human NMDA receptors

N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors are ionotropic glutamate receptors that mediate excitatory neurotransmission. NMDA receptors are also important drug targets that are implicated in a number of pathophysiological conditions. To facilitate the transition from lead compounds in pre-clinical animal models to drug candidates for human use, it is important to establish whether NMDA receptor ligands have similar properties at rodent and human NMDA receptors. Here, we compare amino acid sequences for human and rat NMDA receptor subunits and discuss inter-species variation in the context of our current knowledge of the relationship between NMDA receptor structure and function. We summarize studies on the biophysical properties of human NMDA receptors and compare these properties to those of rat orthologs. Finally, we provide a comprehensive pharmacological characterization that allows side-by-side comparison of agonists, un-competitive antagonists, GluN2B-selective non-competitive antagonists, and GluN2C/D-selective modulators at recombinant human and rat NMDA receptors. The evaluation of biophysical properties and pharmacological probes acting at different sites on the receptor suggest that the binding sites and conformational changes leading to channel gating in response to agonist binding are highly conserved between human and rat NMDA receptors. In summary, the results of this study suggest that no major detectable differences exist in the pharmacological and functional properties of human and rat NMDA receptors.     

GnRHs and GnRH receptors

GnRH is the pivotal hypothalamic hormone regulating reproduction. Over 20 forms of the decapeptide have been identified in which the NH2- and COOH-terminal sequences, which are essential for receptor binding and activation, are conserved. In mammals, there are two forms, GnRH I which regulates gonadotropin and GnRH II which appears to be a neuromodulator and stimulates sexual behaviour. GnRHs also occur in reproductive tissues and tumours in which a paracrine/autocrine role is postulated. GnRH agonists and antagonists are now extensively used to treat hormone-dependent diseases, in assisted conception and have promise as novel contraceptives. Non-peptide orally-active GnRH antagonists have been recently developed and may increase the flexibility and range of utility. As with GnRH, GnRH receptors have undergone co-ordinated gene duplications such that cognate receptor subtypes for respective ligands exist in most vertebrates. Interestingly, in man and some other mammals (e.g. chimp, sheep and bovine) the Type II GnRH receptor has been silenced. However, GnRH I and GnRH II still appear to have distinct roles in signalling differentially through the Type I receptor (ligand-selective-signalling) to have different downstream effects. The ligand-receptor interactions and receptor conformational changes involved in receptor activation have been partly delineated. Together, these findings are setting the scene for generating novel selective GnRH analogues with potential for wider and more specific application.     

Activation of ionotropic receptors and thermodynamics of binding

The structure, thermodynamics and activation mechanism of Cys-loop ionotropic receptors such as glycine, nicotinic acetylcholine, 5-HT3-type serotonin and A-type gamma-aminobutyric acid receptors are discussed. Based on the interrelationship of receptor binding and ionophore function, a ternary displacement mechanism of binding including the activation of ionophores is outlined. This displacement model can explain the enigmatic thermodynamic discrimination of agonists versus antagonists of Cys-loop ionotropic receptors. Binding of both agonists and antagonists is exothermic while activation is endothermic driven by large increases in entropy. Closure of the binding cavities around agonists in concert with subunit rotations and/or removal of water-filled crevices between transmembrane (TM) regions can account for entropy increases. Recombinant glycine and gamma-aminobutyric acidA receptors and their point mutations support the predominant role of entropy in receptor activation.     

Cannabinoid receptors and their ligands

There are at least two types of cannabinoid receptors, CB(1) and CB(2), both coupled to G proteins. CB(1) receptors exist primarily on central and peripheral neurons, one of their functions being to modulate neurotransmitter release. CB(2) receptors are present mainly on immune cells. Their roles are proving more difficult to establish but seem to include the modulation of cytokine release. Endogenous agonists for cannabinoid receptors (endocannabinoids) have also been discovered, the most important being arachidonoyl ethanolamide (anandamide), 2-arachidonoyl glycerol and 2-arachidonyl glyceryl ether. Other endocannabinoids and cannabinoid receptor types may also exist. Although anandamide can act through CB(1) and CB(2) receptors, it is also a vanilloid receptor agonist and some of its metabolites may possess yet other important modes of action. The discovery of the system of cannabinoid receptors and endocannabinoids that constitutes the "endocannabinoid system" has prompted the development of CB(1)- and CB(2)-selective agonists and antagonists/inverse agonists. CB(1)/CB(2) agonists are already used clinically, as anti-emetics or to stimulate appetite. Potential therapeutic uses of cannabinoid receptor agonists include the management of multiple sclerosis/spinal cord injury, pain, inflammatory disorders, glaucoma, bronchial asthma, vasodilation that accompanies advanced cirrhosis, and cancer. Following their release onto cannabinoid receptors, endocannabinoids are removed from the extracellular space by membrane transport and then degraded by intracellular enzymic hydrolysis. Inhibitors of both these processes have been developed. Such inhibitors have therapeutic potential as animal data suggest that released endocannabinoids mediate reductions both in inflammatory pain and in the spasticity and tremor of multiple sclerosis. So too have CB(1) receptor antagonists, for example for the suppression of appetite and the management of cognitive dysfunction or schizophrenia.     

Homology-modeled ligand-binding domains of medaka estrogen receptors and androgen receptors: A model system for the study of reproduction

Estrogen and androgen and their receptors play critical roles in physiological processes such as sexual differentiation and development. Using the available structural models for the human estrogen receptors alpha and beta and androgen receptor as templates, we designed in silico agonist and antagonist models of medaka estrogen receptor (meER) alpha, beta-1, and beta-2, and androgen receptor (meAR) alpha and beta. Using these models, we studied (1) the structural relationship between the ligand-binding domains (LBDs) of ERs and ARs of human and medaka, and (2) whether medaka ER and AR can be potential models for studying the ligand-binding activities of various agonists and antagonists of these receptors by docking analysis. A high level of conservation was observed between the sequences of the ligand-binding domains of meERα and huERα, meERβ1 and huERβ, meERβ2, and huERβ with 62.8%, 66.4%, and 65.1% identity, respectively. The sequence conservation between meARα and huAR, meARβ, and huAR was found with 70.1% and 61.0% of identity, respectively. Thirty-three selected endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs), including both agonists and antagonists, were docked into the LBD of ER and AR, and the corresponding docking score for medaka models and human templates were calculated. In order to confirm the conservation of the overall geometry and the binding pocket, the backbone root mean square deviation (RMSD) for Cα atoms was derived from the structure superposition of all 10 medaka homology models to the six human templates. Our results suggested conformational conservation between the ERs and ARs of medaka and human, Thus, medaka could be highly useful as a model system for studies involving estrogen and androgen interaction with their receptors.     

Low affinity of beta-adrenergic receptors for agonists on intact cells is not due to receptor sequestration

The low affinity of beta-adrenergic receptors for agonists described on intact cells at 37 degrees C has usually been interpreted in terms of reduced accessibility of agonists (which are usually hydrophilic) for sequestered receptors. We challenged this hypothesis by eliminating the plasma membrane barrier with low doses of the detergent digitonin. In human mononuclear leukocytes (MNL) permeabilized with digitonin, sequestered receptors became accessible to hydrophilic ligands such as agonists, but the affinity was still low. Then we investigated the relationship between low affinity agonist binding and sequestration using concanavalin A, which blocks sequestration. Even when sequestration was blocked, the affinity of the beta-adrenergic receptors for agonists was low. We conclude that: (a) low affinity agonist binding is independent of receptor sequestration; (b) the receptors which undergo conformational change are those that are sequestered; (c) the low affinity appears before sequestration occurs. This receptor conformational change could be the first step in agonist-induced desensitization.     

The alpha-factor mating pheromone of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a model for studying the interaction of peptide hormones and G protein-coupled receptors

Mating in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is initiated by the secretion of diffusible peptide pheromones that are recognized by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR). This review summarizes the use of the alpha-factor (WHWLQLKPGQPMY)--GPCR (Ste2p) interaction as a paradigm to understand the recognition between medium-sized peptide hormones and their cognate receptors. Studies over the past 15 years have indicated that the alpha-factor is bent around the center of the pheromone and that residues near the amine terminus play a central role in triggering signal transduction. The bend in the center appears not to be rigid and this flexibility is likely necessary for conformational changes that occur as the receptor switches from the inactive to active state. The results of synthetic, biological, biochemical, molecular biological, and biophysical analyses have led to a preliminary model for the structure of the peptide bound to its receptor. Antagonists for Ste2p have changes near the N-terminus of alpha-factor, and mutated forms of Ste2p were discovered that appear to favor binding of these antagonists relative to agonists. Many features of this yeast recognition system are relevant to and have counterparts in mammalian cells.     

An antagonistic interaction between A2B adenosine and D2 dopamine receptors modulates the function of rat carotid body chemoreceptor cells

We have previously demonstrated that adenosine controls the release of catecholamines (CA) from carotid body (CB) acting on A2B receptors. Here, we have tested the hypothesis that the control is exerted via an interaction between adenosine A2B and dopamine D2 receptors present in chemoreceptor cells. Experiments were performed in vitro in CB from 3 months rats. The effect of A2B adenosine and D2 dopamine agonists and antagonists applied alone or in combination were studied on basal (20%O2) and hypoxia (10%O2)-evoked release of CA and cAMP content of CB. We have found that adenosine A2 agonists and D2 antagonists dose-dependently increased basal and evoked release CA from the CB while A2 antagonists and D2 agonists had an inhibitory action. The existence of A2B-D2 receptor interaction was established because the inhibitory action of A2 antagonists was abolished by D2 antagonists, and the stimulatory action of A2 agonists was abolished by D2 agonists. Further, A2 agonists increased and D2 agonist decreased cAMP content in the CB; their co-application eliminated the response. The present results provide direct pharmacological evidence that an antagonistic interaction between A2B adenosine and D2 dopamine receptors exist in rat CB and would explain the dopamine-adenosine interactions on ventilation previously observed.     

Classification of kinin receptors

This minireview is divided into three parts: the first part refers to the characterization and classification of kinin receptors using agonists and antagonists in isolated tissues (classical pharmacology). Two kinin receptors have been considered on the basis of their distinct pharmacology, namely the B1 receptor of the rabbit aorta (rank order of potency of agonists: LysdesArg9BK > desArg9BK > or = LysBK > BK; apparent affinities of antagonists Lys[Leu8]desArg9BK (pIC50 8.4) > [Leu8]desArg9BK (pIC50 7.4) > HOE 140, a B2 receptor antagonist, pIC50<5.0), and the B2 receptor of the rabbit jugular vein (potency of agonists: LysBK = BK > LysdesArg9BK = desArg9BK and HOE 140 (pIC50 9.0) > Lys[Leu8]desArg9BK, pIC50<5.0). The second part describes species-related B1 receptor subtypes, demonstrated by different pharmacological profiles of agonists and antagonists: human, rabbit and pig subtypes (LysdesArg9BK > desArg9BK and Lys[Leu8]desArg9BK > [Leu8]desArg9BK) and dog, rat, mouse and hamster B1 receptors (desArg9BK = LysdesArg9BK and [Leus]desArg9BK = Lys[Leu8]desArg9BK). Affinities of agonists and antagonists in some species (man, rabbit, pig) are significantly increased (at least 10-fold) by the presence of a Lys at their N-terminus. The last part describes species-related B2 receptor subtypes supported by results obtained with non-peptide receptor agonists (FR 190997) and antagonists (FR 173657). While BK acts as a full agonist in man, rabbit and pig, FR 190997 behaves as a full agonist on human, as partial agonist on rabbit, and as pure antagonist on pig B2 receptors. Various hypotheses are considered to interpret these findings.     

Two dopamine receptors: biochemistry, physiology and pharmacology

In 1979, two categories of dopamine (DA) receptors (designated as D-1 and D-2) were identified on the basis of the ability of a limited number of agonists and antagonists to discriminate between these two entities. In the past 5 years agonists and antagonists selective for each category of receptor have been identified. Using these selective drugs it has been possible to attribute the effects of DA upon physiological and biochemical processes to the stimulation of either a D-1 or a D-2 receptor. Thus, DA-induced enhancement of both hormone release from bovine parathyroid gland and firing of neurosecretory cells in the CNS of Lymnaea stagnalis has been attributed to stimulation of a D-1 receptor. Likewise, the DA-induced inhibition of the release of prolactin and alpha-MSH from the pituitary gland, as well as of acetylcholine, DA and beta-endorphin from brain, the DA-induced inhibition of chemo-sensory discharge in rabbit carotid body and the DA-induced hyperpolarization of neurosecretory cells in the CNS of Lymnaea stagnalis have been attributed to stimulation of a D-2 receptor. Independently two categories of DA receptors (designated as DA-1 and DA-2) were identified in the cardiovascular system. Stimulation of a DA-1 receptor increases the vascular cyclic AMP content and causes a relaxation of vascular smooth muscle in renal blood vessels, whereas stimulation of a DA-2 receptor inhibits the release of norepinephrine from certain postganglionic sympathetic neurons. Recent studies with the newly developed drugs discriminating between D-1 and D-2 receptors suggest however that the independently developed schemata for classification of dopamine receptors in either the central nervous and endocrine systems or the cardiovascular system are similar although maybe not completely identical.     

Predicting novel binding modes of agonists to β adrenergic receptors using all-atom molecular dynamics simulations

Understanding the binding mode of agonists to adrenergic receptors is crucial to enabling improved rational design of new therapeutic agents. However, so far the high conformational flexibility of G protein-coupled receptors has been an obstacle to obtaining structural information on agonist binding at atomic resolution. In this study, we report microsecond classical molecular dynamics simulations of β(1) and β(2) adrenergic receptors bound to the full agonist isoprenaline and in their unliganded form. These simulations show a novel agonist binding mode that differs from the one found for antagonists in the crystal structures and from the docking poses reported by in silico docking studies performed on rigid receptors. Internal water molecules contribute to the stabilization of novel interactions between ligand and receptor, both at the interface of helices V and VI with the catechol group of isoprenaline as well as at the interface of helices III and VII with the ethanolamine moiety of the ligand. Despite the fact that the characteristic N-C-C-OH motif is identical in the co-crystallized ligands and in the full agonist isoprenaline, the interaction network between this group and the anchor site formed by Asp(3.32) and Asn(7.39) is substantially different between agonists and inverse agonists/antagonists due to two water molecules that enter the cavity and contribute to the stabilization of a novel network of interactions. These new binding poses, together with observed conformational changes in the extracellular loops, suggest possible determinants of receptor specificity.     

Adenosine receptors and cancer

Adenosine is a ubiquitous signaling molecule whose physiological functions are mediated by its interaction with four G-protein-coupled receptor subtypes, termed A(1), A(2A), A(2B) and A(3). As a result of increased metabolic rates, this nucleoside is released from a variety of cells throughout the body in concentrations that can have a profound impact on vasculature and immunoescape. However, as high concentrations of adenosine have been reported in cancer tissues, it also appears to be implicated in the growth of tumors. Thus, full characterisation of the role of adenosine in tumor development, by addressing the question of whether adenosine receptors are present in cancer tissues, and, if so, which receptor subtype mediates its effects in cancer growth, is a vital research goal. To this end, this review focuses on the most relevant aspects of adenosine receptor subtype activation in tumors reported so far. Although all adenosine receptors now have an increasing number of recognised biological roles in tumors, it seems that the A(2A) and A(3) subtypes are the most promising as regards drug development. In particular, activation of A(2A) receptors leads to immunosuppressive effects, which decreases anti-tumoral immunity and thereby encourages tumor growth. Due to this behavior, the addition of A(2A) antagonists to cancer immunotherapeutic protocols has been suggested as a way of enhancing tumor immunotherapy. Interestingly, the safety of such compounds has already been demonstrated in trials employing A(2A) antagonists in the treatment of Parkinson's disease. As for A(3) receptors, the effectiveness of their agonists in several animal tumor models has led to the introduction of these molecules into a programme of pre-clinical and clinical trials. Paradoxically, A(3) receptor antagonists also appear to be promising candidates in human cancer treatment of regimes. Clearly, research in this still field is still in its infancy, with several important and challenging issues remaining to be addressed, although purine scientists do seem to be getting closer to their goal: the incorporation of adenosine ligands into drugs with the ability to save lives and improve human health.     

Lysophospholipid G protein-coupled receptors

The many biological responses documented for lysophospholipids that include lysophosphatidic acid and sphingosine 1-phosphate can be mechanistically attributed to signaling through specific G protein-coupled receptors. At least nine receptors have now been identified, and the total number is likely to be larger. In this brief review, we note cogent features of lysophospholipid receptors, including the current nomenclature, signaling properties, development of agonists and antagonists, and physiological functions.     

Na+/H+ exchangers, alpha-2-adrenergic receptors, sodium sensitivity and arterial hypertension]

Existing evidences indicate that a crossed regulation between alpha 2-adrenergic receptors and Na+/H+ exchanger(s) exists, that Na decreases the affinity of alpha 2-adrenergic receptors for agonists and antagonists, that intracellular Na+ and H+ ion concentrations regulate Na+/H+ exchanger activity, that intracellular pH controls the affinity of the alpha 2-adrenergic receptors for their agonists and antagonists. Alterations of alpha 2-adrenergic receptor densities and allosteric regulation by sodium have been demonstrated in sodium-dependent hypertension in rats. Increased Na+/H+ exchanger activity has been reported in genetic hypertension. Nevertheless, cosegregation experiments and human genetic polymorphism suggest that the exchanger could not be related to hypertension. We propose the following hypothesis: the increased Na+/H+ exchanger characteristic of hypertension could be secondary to the abnormalities of the alpha 2-adrenergic receptors found in hypertension, probably through the alteration of the sodium allosteric effect on these receptors.     

Pharmacologic methods for identification of receptors

Determinations of apparent equilibrium dissociation constants of drug-receptor interactions are made from both functional and radioligand binding studies. In each type of study, reversible reactions are assumed and the mass action law is applied. Functional studies are frequently used to determine the dissociation constant of a competitive antagonist but are less frequently used to obtain this constant for agonist compounds since the latter determination requires an experimental procedure that irreversibly inactivates a fraction of the receptors. In the present report, values of dissociation constant for prototype agonists and antagonists, determined from binding and from functional studies, are examined in two classical isolated preparations, rabbit aorta and guinea-pig ileum. In each preparation the dissociation constants from binding and functional experiments agree well for the antagonists but differ markedly for the agonists. Further, the dissociation constant values from binding are seen to be greater for the agonists than for the antagonists. When a chronic treatment regimen in the rabbit resulted in a pronounced change in the functional dissociation constant of subsequently administered norepinephrine, there was no significant change in either the binding constant of this agonist or in the pA2 value of the alpha antagonist, phentolamine. These, and the previously described results, are shown to be compatible with a simple two-state receptor model in which agonists bind with high and low affinity to each state while antagonists do not distinguish between the states. In this model, the ratio of low to high affinity states accounts for the failure of the binding procedure to detect changes in the agonists dissociation constant that are highly significant in the functional study. Whereas the model is based on data for these two classical preparations only, and may not be more generally applicable, the findings demonstrate the necessity for employing both functional and radioligand binding experiments when characterizing drug receptors.