How lambda repressor and lambda Cro distinguish between OR1 and OR3

Although lambda repressor and lambda Cro bind to the same six operators on the phage chromosome, the fine specificities of the two proteins differ: repressor binds more tightly to OR1 than to OR3, and vice versa for Cro. In this paper, we change base pairs in the operators and amino acids in the proteins to analyze the basis for these preferences. We find that these preferences are determined by residues 5 and 6 of the recognition helices of the two proteins and by the amino-terminal arm, in the case of repressor. We also find that the most important base pairs in the operator which enable repressor and Cro to discriminate between OR1 and OR3 are position 3 (for Cro) and positions 5 and 8 (for repressor). These and previous results show how repressor and Cro recognize and distinguish between two related operator sequences.     

Domains in lambda Cro repressor. A calorimetric study.

Thermodynamic properties of a mutant lambda Cro repressor with Cys replacing Val55 were studied calorimetrically. Formation of the S-S cross-link between neighboring Cys55 residues in this dimeric molecule leads to stabilization of a structure formed by the C-terminal parts of the two polypeptide chains, which behave as a single cooperative domain upon protein denaturation by heating. This composite domain is very stable at neutral pH and disrupts at 110 degrees C. The S-S-cross-linked tryptic fragment (residues 22-66), which includes this C-terminal domain, has similar stability. The N-terminal parts of the polypeptide chains do not form any stable structure when isolated, but in S-S-cross-linked dimer, they form a single cooperative block which melts in an all-or-none way 9 degrees C higher than the un-cross-linked protein. The observed cooperation of the distant N-terminal parts in dimer raises questions regarding lambda Cro repressor structure in solution.     

N15 Cro and lambda Cro: orthologous DNA-binding domains with completely different but equally effective homodimer interfaces

Bacteriophage Cro proteins bind to target DNA as dimers but do not all dimerize with equal strength, and differ in fold in the region of the dimer interface. We report the structure of the Cro protein from Enterobacteria phage N15 at 1.05 A resolution. The subunit fold contains five alpha-helices and is closely similar to the structure of P22 Cro (1.3 A backbone room mean square difference over 52 residues), but quite different from that of lambda Cro, a structurally diverged member of this family with a mixed alpha-helix/beta-sheet fold. N15 Cro crystallizes as a biological dimer with an extensive interface (1303 A(2) change in accessible surface area per dimer) and also dimerizes in solution with a K(d) of 5.1 +/- 1.5 microM. Its dimerization is much stronger than that of its structural homolog P22 Cro, which does not self-associate detectably in solution. Instead, the level of self-association and interfacial area for N15 Cro is similar to that of lambda Cro, even though these two orthologs do not share the same fold and have dimer interfaces that are qualitatively different in structure. The common Cro ancestor is thought to be an all-helical monomer similar to P22 Cro. We propose that two Cro descendants independently developed stronger dimerization by entirely different mechanisms.     

In vivo non-specific binding of lambda CI and Cro repressors is significant

We propose a thermodynamic model that includes the non-specific binding of the lambda phage regulatory proteins CI and Cro. By fitting the model to experimental in vivo data on activities of the two promoters P(RM) and P(R) versus concentration, we estimate the free energy upon non-specific binding to be -4.1+/-0.9 kcal/mol for CI and -4.2+/-0.8 kcal/mol for Cro. For concentrations >100 nM of CI or Cro, we find that >50% of these proteins are non-specifically bound. In particular, in a lysogen (approximately 250 CI monomeric equivalents per cell) nearly 90% of CI is non-specifically bound.     

Solution structure and dynamics of a designed monomeric variant of the lambda Cro repressor.

The solution structure of a monomeric variant of the lambda Cro repressor has been determined by multidimensional NMR. Cro K56[DGEVK] differs from wild-type Cro by the insertion of five amino acids at the center of the dimer interface. 1H and 15N resonances for 70 of the 71 residues have been assigned. Thirty-two structures were calculated by hybrid distance geometry/simulated annealing methods using 463 NOE-distance restraints, 26 hydrogen-bond, and 39 dihedral-angle restraints. The root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) from the average structure for atoms in residues 3-60 is 1.03 +/- 0.44 A for the peptide backbone and 1.6 +/- 0.73 A for all nonhydrogen atoms. The overall structure conforms very well to the original design. Although the five inserted residues form a beta hairpin as expected, this engineered turn as well as other turns in the structure are not well defined by the NMR data. Dynamics studies of backbone amides reveal T1/T2 ratios of residues in the alpha2-alpha3, beta2-beta3, and engineered turn that are reflective of chemical exchange or internal motion. The solution structure and dynamics are discussed in light of the conformational variation that has been observed in other Cro structures, and the importance of flexibility in DNA recognition.     

The structure of a repressor: crystallographic data for the Cro regulatory protein of bacteriophage lambda.

Crystals of the bacteriophage λ Cro repressor protein that are suitable for X-ray diffraction studies have been obtained. Preliminary crystallographic analysis reveals that the space group is R32, the cell dimensions in the hexagonal system are $\text{a = b = 91·9}\text{A}\text{?}\text{, c = 268·9}\text{A}\text{?}$, and there are three dimers per asymmetric unit.     

Amino acid substitutions that increase the thermal stability of the lambda Cro protein

A mutant Cro protein, which bears the Ile-30----Leu substitution, is thermally unstable and degraded more rapidly than wild-type Cro in vivo. Using an antibody screen, we have isolated five different second site suppressor substitutions that reduce the proteolytic hypersensitivity of this mutant Cro protein. Two of the suppressor substitutions increase the thermal stability of Cro by 12 degrees C to 14 degrees C. These amino acid substitutions affect residues 16 and 26, which are substantially exposed to solvent in the crystal structure of wild-type Cro.     

Design of lambda Cro fold: solution structure of a monomeric variant of the de novo protein

One of the classical DNA-binding proteins, bacteriophage lambda Cro, forms a homodimer with a unique fold of alpha-helices and beta-sheets. We have computationally designed an artificial sequence of 60 amino acid residues to stabilize the backbone tertiary structure of the lambda Cro dimer by simulated annealing using knowledge-based structure-sequence compatibility functions. The designed amino acid sequence has 25% identity with that of natural lambda Cro and preserves Phe58, which is important for formation of the stably folded structure of lambda Cro. The designed dimer protein and its monomeric variant, which was redesigned by the insertion of a beta-hairpin sequence at the C-terminal region to prevent dimerization, were synthesized and biochemically characterized to be well folded. The designed protein was monomeric under a wide range of protein concentrations and its solution structure was determined by NMR spectroscopy. The solved structure is similar to that of a monomeric variant of natural lambda Cro with a root-mean-square deviation of the polypeptide backbones at 2.1A and has a well-packed protein core. Thus, our knowledge-based functions provide approximate but essential relationships between amino acid sequences and protein structures, and are useful for finding novel sequences that are foldable into a given target structure.     

Folding and assembly of lambda Cro repressor dimers are kinetically limited by proline isomerization

Cro binds to operator sites in lambda DNA as a dimer. Dimerization of this small repressor protein is weak, however, and proline residues in the dimer interface suggest that folding and assembly of active repressors may be complex. Cro and selected variants have been studied by circular dichroism and fluorescence. Fluorescent probes include a unique tryptophan residue in the dimer interface and extrinsic resonance energy transfer probes that monitor dimerization. Both folding and unfolding are characterized by two distinct kinetic phases. Fast processes that are complete within the 5-10 ms dead time of stopped flow experiments account for the majority of the change in the CD signal and abrupt changes in both tryptophan fluorescence and energy transfer. The slow phases show all the hallmarks of proline isomerization. The rates of the slow phases are between 0.005 and 0.02 s(-1), are relatively independent of protein and denaturant concentration, display activation energies of 20 kcal/mol, and are accelerated by the peptidyl-prolyl isomerase SlyD. Although CD measurements indicate that more than 70% of the secondary structure is regained in the refolding burst phase, intermolecular fluorescence resonance energy transfer experiments indicate that less than 25% of these subunits are assembled into dimers. Full folding and dimerization requires isomerization of the non-native prolyl isomers over hundreds of seconds.