二阶段等距抽样

本文提出了二阶段等距抽样的概念．分第二阶段样本为等距抽样和SRSWOR两种情况讨论了总体平均值的估计问题．在第二阶段抽样为SRSWOR情况下，讨论了辅助信息的利用问题，提出了总体平均值的比型估计和回归型估计．并通过一个实际计算的例子，对文中提出的不同估计量进行了比较．     

An estimator of number of species from quadrat sampling

We consider the problem of estimating the number of distinct species S in a study area from the recorded presence or absence of species in each of a sample of quadrats. A generalized jackknife estimator of S is derived, along with an estimate of its variance. It is compared with the jackknife estimator for S proposed by Heltshe and Forrester and the empirical Bayes estimator of Mingoti and Meeden. We show that the empirical Bayes estimator has the form of a generalized jackknife estimator under a specific model for species distribution. We compare the new estimators of S to the empirical Bayes estimator via simulation. We characterize circumstances under which each is superior.     

Estimation of Difference of Population Means with Missing Observations

Sampling strategies for estimating difference of population means are proposed. The original sample is fragmented into three subsamples. The use of a purposive device permits to measure only one of the variables in two samples. Bootstrap procedures are employed to evaluate distribution of the errors of estimators.     

两阶抽样中比率型估计量的平均精度

本文给出了两阶抽样中总体均值的比率型估计量的平均精度,它当样本容量充分大时主项不劣于无偏估计量的平均精度．     

A Product-Type Estimator in Double Sampling

The use of ratio and product estimators, using auxiliary information, for estimating the mean of a finite population is well known. The efficiency of ratio estimator or product estimator is high depending on whether the auxiliary character is highly positively or negatively coorelated with the main character of interest. This paper proposes a product-type estimator which is more efficient than the usual ratio and product estimators in practical situations. We consider the case of double sampling from which the single sampling results may easily be derived.     

Small Sample Bias and Variance of Lincoln-Petersen and Bailey Estimators

The Lincoln-Petersen and Bailey estimators of an unknown population size were compared in a computer simulation of capture-recapture sampling with replacement from small populations. The Bailey estimator was negatively biased and had smaller variance than the Petersen estimator. The Petersen estimator tended to be positively biased. The Lincoln-Petersen variance estimator tended to be positively biased while the Bailey variance estimator was negatively biased.     

Predictive Estimation of Finite Population Mean Using a Product Estimator for Two-Stage Sampling

In an attempt to estimate a finite population mean under the predictive approach described in Basu (1971) through the product method of estimation, we created a new product-type estimator for a two-stage sampling procedure. We also report a simulation study that is made in order to understand better the performance of the new estimator compared to the classical product estimator.     

Design‐based inference on Bernstein type estimators for continuous populations

The estimation of the values of a variable at any point of a study area is performed using Bernstein polynomials when the sampling scheme is implemented by selecting a point in each polygon of a regular grid overimposed onto the area. The evaluation of the precision of the resulting estimates is investigated under a completely design‐based framework. Moreover, as the main contribution to the mean squared error of the Bernstein‐type estimator is due to the bias, also a pseudo‐jackknife estimator is proposed. The performance of both estimators is investigated theoretically and by means of a simulation study. An application to a soil survey performed in Berkshire Downs in Oxfordshire (UK) is considered.     

Bootstrap confidence intervals for adaptive cluster sampling

Consider a collection of spatially clustered objects where the clusters are geographically rare. Of interest is estimation of the total number of objects on the site from a sample of plots of equal size. Under these spatial conditions, adaptive cluster sampling of plots is generally useful in improving efficiency in estimation over simple random sampling without replacement (SRSWOR). In adaptive cluster sampling, when a sampled plot meets some predefined condition, neighboring plots are added to the sample. When populations are rare and clustered, the usual unbiased estimators based on small samples are often highly skewed and discrete in distribution. Thus, confidence intervals based on asymptotic normal theory may not be appropriate. We investigated several nonparametric bootstrap methods for constructing confidence intervals under adaptive cluster sampling. To perform bootstrapping, we transformed the initial sample in order to include the information from the adaptive portion of the sample yet maintain a fixed sample size. In general, coverages of bootstrap percentile methods were closer to nominal coverage than the normal approximation.     

On Use of Distinct Respondents in Randomized Response Surveys

It is well known for direct response surveys (DR), where the responses are obtained from the respondents directly, that the sample mean, based on distinct units of a simple random sample selected with replacement (SRSWR) method, is more efficient than the sample mean based on all the units including repetition. In this paper, it is shown that a linear unbiased estimator based on distinct units is inadmissible for estimating a finite population mean when the sample is selected by an arbitrary with replacement (WR) sampling scheme and the responses are obtained independently by some RR technique. Efficiencies for a few linear unbiased estimators are compared under SRSWR sampling.     

On an Efficient Regression Type Estimator

The regression type estimator proposed by KAUR (1985) is considered. Another expression for the approximated mean square error (AMSE), to a first degree of approximation, is obtained. This AMSE is also minimized with respect to a parameter α. Three numerical examples are included. These numerical examples show that this estimator is not significantly more efficient than regression estimator and with respect to ratio and sample mean estimators, it does not always exhibit a high efficiency, as was contended by KAUR (1985). Moreover, an upper bound for the relative precision of the proposed estimator with respect to linear regression estimator is derived.     

An Alternative Approach to Estimation in Two-Phase Sampling Using two Auxiliary Variables

Using two-phase sampling mechanism, two alternative estimators in the presence of the available knowledge on second auxiliary variable z are considered, when the population mean of the main auxiliary variable × is unknown. The suggested estimators are found to be more eficient than the ratio-type and regression-type estimators suggested by KIREGYERA (1980, 1984).     

Estimation of Population Regression Coefficient in Successive Sampling

An attempt has been made to derive the theory of successive sampling for estimation of regression coefficient. The situations considered are estimation of regression coefficient for current occasion, estimation of change of regression coefficients over two occasions and estimation of average of regression coefficients over two occasions. The expressions of optimum estimators along with their variances have been worked out. On comparing their efficiencies empirically, it has been observed that similar to the estimation of mean, successive sampling can also be used with advantage for estimation of regression coefficient.     

Some Early Developments in Ratio Estimation

John Graunt (1662) was the first to estimate the ratio y/x where y represents the total population and x the known total number of registered births in the same areas during the preceding year. About 1765 Messance (Stephan, 1948) and Moheau (1778) published very carefully prepared estimates for France based on enumeration of population in certain districts and on the count of births, deaths and marriages as reported for the whole country. The districts from which the ratio of inhabitants to birth was determined only constituted a sample. Laplace (1786) prepared similar estimates in 1802 based on a two-stage sampling plan. Recently Hansen and Hurwitz (1943) showed that the ratio estimate (y_i/n_i)X of Y is unbiased where all x_i's are known and the n^th cluster is selected with p.p.s. More recently Hájek (1949), Lahiri (1951), Midzuno (1952) and Sen (1952) developed independently the sampling of n clusters with p.p.s to the totals of the sizes of the sample clusters S(x_i). Des Raj (1954) and Sen (1952, 1953) gave unbiased estimate of the variance of the estimator which was generally non-negative for samples with smaller probabilities. Rao and Vijayan (1977) gave an unbiased estimator which is non-negative for samples with larger probabilities. Hájek (1949) provided an almost unbiased estimator of the variance of the estimator. The paper discusses situations where Hájek's estimator of variance should be preferred to the Rao-Vijayan estimator and vice versa.     

二次等距抽样

本文提出了一种二次等距抽样方法,并提出了总体平均值的一个估计量：拼配部分的比型估计与轮换部分的样本均值的加权平均。当样本量较大时,求出了估计量的方差及最优轮换比．并对特殊情形进行了讨论和数值比较．