Molecular chaperone GroEL/ES: Unfolding and refolding processes

Molecular chaperones are a special class of heat shock proteins (Hsp) that assist the folding and formation of the quaternary structure of other proteins both in vivo and in vitro. However, some chaperones are complex oligomeric proteins, and one of the intriguing questions is how the chaperones fold. The representatives of the Escherichia coli chaperone system GroEL (Hsp60) and GroES (Hsp10) have been studied most intensively. GroEL consists of 14 identical subunits combined into two interacting ring-like structures of seven subunits each, while the co-chaperone GroES interacting with GroEL consists of seven identical subunits combined into a dome-like oligomeric structure. In spite of their complex quaternary structure, GroEL and GroES fold well both in vivo and in vitro. However, the specific oligomerization of GroEL subunits is dependent on ligands and external conditions. This review analyzes the literature and our own data on the study of unfolding (denaturation) and refolding (renaturation) processes of these molecular chaperones and the effect of ligands and solvent composition. Such analysis seems to be useful for understanding the folding mechanism not only of the GroEL/GroES complex, but also of other oligomeric protein complexes.     

Reduced stability and enhanced surface hydrophobicity drive the binding of apo-aconitase with GroEL during chaperone assisted refolding

Apo-aconitase, the Fe₄S₄ cluster free form of TCA cycle enzyme aconitase, binds with GroEL and dissociates itself upon maturation through insertion of the cluster. It is not clearly established as to why apo-protein binds with GroEL. In order to explore the possibility that stability is a factor responsible for the aggregation of apo-form at low ionic strengths and hence it associates with GroEL to avoid the unfavorable event, we carried out the unfolding studies with holo- and apo-aconitase. By probing the unfolding process through the changes in secondary structural element, exposed surface hydrophobicity, and the microenvironment around tryptophan residues, we were able to establish the relevant changes associated with the event. Apparent guanidine hydrochloride concentration required for unfolding of 50% of aconitase indicates that aconitase is destabilized in the absence of the Fe₄S₄ cluster. The destabilization of the apo-aconitase was further reflected through its three times higher rate of unfolding as compared to the holo-protein. It was also observed that the apo-form has higher surface hydrophobicity than the holo-form. Hence, the lower ground state stability and higher solvent exposed hydrophobic surface of the apo-form makes it aggregation prone. Based on the present observation and earlier findings, we propose that binding of apo-aconitase to GroEL not only rescues it from the aggregation, but also assists in the final stage of maturation by orienting the cluster insertion site of GroEL bound apo-protein. This information sheds new light on the potential role of GroEL in the biosynthetic pathway of the metallo proteins.     

Comparison of refolding activities between nanogel artificial chaperone and GroEL systems

The chaperone-like activity of a nanogel of cholesteryl group-bearing pullulan (CHP) was compared with that of GroEL for refolding acid-denatured green fluorescent protein (GFP). The refolding of denatured GFP was carried out by dilution of acid-denatured GFP in the presence of the nanogel or GroEL. GFP fluorescence was increasingly repressed with increases in the concentration of the CHP nanogel or GroEL added to the dilution buffer. The concentrations of 50% inhibition of recovery of GFP fluorescence were 0.03 microM (GroEL) and 0.08 microM (CHP nanogel), respectively. The refolding was resumed by the addition of ATP into the GroEL (0.20 microM) system or by the addition of methyl-beta-cyclodextrin into the nanogel (0.20 microM) system. In the nanogel-GFP system, about 90% of the intensity was recovered within 10 min. The half time (t(1/2)) for refolding in the CHP nanogel system (36 s) is almost equal to that of the natural chaperone GroEL-GroES system.     

Introduction to beetle luciferases and their applications

All beetle luciferases have evolved from a common ancestor: they all use ATP, O₂, and a common luciferin as substrates. The most studied of these luciferases is that derived from the firefly Photinus pyralis, a beetle in the superfamily of Cantharoidea. The sensitivity with which the activity of this enzyme can be assayed has made it useful in the measurement of minute concentrations of ATP. With the cloning of the cDNA coding this luciferase, it has also found wide application in molecular biology as a reporter gene. We have recently cloned other cDNAs that code for luciferases from the bioluminescent click beetle, Pyrophorus plagiophthalamus, in the superfamily Elateroidea. These newly acquired luciferases are of at least four different types, distinguishable by their ability to emit different colours of bioluminescence ranging from green to orange. Unique properties of these luciferases, especially their emission of multiple colours, may make them additionally useful in applications.     

Trigger factor assists the refolding of heterodimeric but not monomeric luciferases

The refolding of thermally inactivated protein by ATP-independent trigger factor (TF) and ATP-dependent DnaKJE chaperones was comparatively analyzed. Heterodimeric (αβ) bacterial luciferases of Aliivibrio fischeri, Photobacterium leiognathi, and Vibrio harveyi as well as monomeric luciferases of Vibrio harveyi and Luciola mingrelica (firefly) were used as substrates. In the presence of TF, thermally inactivated heterodimeric bacterial luciferases refold, while monomeric luciferases do not refold. These observations were made both in vivo (Escherichia coli ΔdnaKJ containing plasmids with tig gene) and in vitro (purified TF). Unlike TF, the DnaKJE chaperone system refolds both monomeric and heterodimeric luciferases with equal efficiency.     

Binding of polylysine to GroEL. Inhibition of the refolding of mMDH.

Luminescence techniques have been used to investigate the interaction of GroEL with polylysine tagged with a fluorescent probe. The fluorescence emitted by anthraniloyl-polylysine, upon excitation at 320 nm, is enhanced by the addition of stoichiometric amounts of GroEL. The equilibrium dissociation constant of the complex (Kd=50 nM) was determined by fluorometric titrations. The rate and extent of recovery of the catalytic activity of denatured mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase, assisted by GroEL, is influenced by either polylysine or anthraniloyl-polylysine. It is suggested that interaction of the positively charged poly-amino acid with the apical domain of GroEL prevents binding of the unfolded protein substrate.     

Cycloamylose as an efficient artificial chaperone for protein refolding

High molecular weight cyclic alpha-1,4-glucan (referred to as cycloamylose) exhibited an artificial chaperone property toward three enzymes in different categories. The inclusion properties of cycloamylose effectively accommodated detergents, which keep the chemically denatured enzymes from aggregation, and promoted proper protein folding. Chemically denatured citrate synthase was refolded and completely recovered it's enzymatic activity after dilution with polyoxyethylenesorbitan buffer followed by cycloamylose treatment. The refolding was completed within 2 h, and the activity of the refolded citrate synthase was quite stable. Cycloamylose also promoted the refolding of denatured carbonic anhydrase B and denatured lysozyme of a reduced form.     

Kinetic model of lysozyme renaturation with the molecular chaperone GroEL

From the renaturation kinetics of denatured/reduced lysozyme assisted by the molecular chaperone GroEL, a simplified kinetic model was established based on the competition between protein folding and aggregation. In the presence of GroEL and ATP, the aggregate formation was a second order reaction. With 2 mM ATP, a renaturation yield of 90% at a high renaturation rate was obtained when the molar ratio of GroEL to lysozyme was 1:1.     

Operational regimes for a simplified one-step artificial chaperone refolding method

The "artificial chaperone method" for protein refolding developed by Rozema et al. (Rozema, D.; Gellman, S. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117 (8), 2373-2374) involves the sequential dilution of denatured protein into a buffer containing detergent (cetyltrimethylammonium bromide, CTAB) and then into a refolding buffer containing cyclodextrin (CD). In this paper a simplified one-step artificial chaperone method is reported, whereby CTAB is added directly to the denatured solution, which is then diluted directly into a refolding buffer containing beta-cyclodextrin (beta-CD). This new method can be applied at high protein concentrations, resulting in smaller processing volumes and a more concentrated protein solution following refolding. The increase in achievable protein concentration results from the enhanced solubility of CTAB at elevated temperatures in concentrated denaturant. The refolding yields obtained for the new method were significantly higher than for control experiments lacking additives and were comparable to the yields obtained with the classical two-step approach. A study of the effect of beta-CD and CTAB concentrations on refolding yield suggested two operational regimes: slow stripping (beta-CD/CTAB approximately 1), most suited for higher protein concentrations, and fast stripping (beta-CD/CTAB approximately 2.7), best suited for lower protein concentrations. An increased chaotrope concentration resulted in higher refolding yields and an enlarged operational regime.     

Asymmetric binding of membrane proteins to GroEL

The interaction of GroEL with non-native soluble proteins has been studied intensively and structure-function relationships have been established in considerable detail. Recently, we found that GroEL is also able to bind membrane proteins in the absence of detergents and deliver them to liposomes in a biologically active state. Here, we report that three well-studied membrane proteins (bacteriorhodopsin, LacY, and the bacteriophage lambda holin) bind asymmetrically to tetradecameric GroEL. Each of the membrane proteins was visualized in one of the center cavities of GroEL using single particle analysis.     

Thr226 is a key residue for bioluminescence spectra determination in beetle luciferases

The comparison of click beetle and railroadworm luciferases (pH-insensitive) with firefly luciferases (pH-sensitive) showed a set of conserved residues differing between the two groups which could be involved with the bioluminescence spectra pH sensitivity. The substitution C258V in Pyrocoelia miyako (Pml) firefly luciferase and V255C in Ragophthalmus ohbai railroad worm luciferase (Rol) had no effect on the bioluminescence spectra. Substitution of Thr226 in the green-light-emitting luciferases of Rol and Pyrearinus termitilluminans (Pyt) click beetle luciferases resulted in red-shifts (12 to 35 nm), whereas the substitution T226N in the red-light-emitting luciferase of Phrixothrix hirtus (PhRE) railroadworm resulted in a 10 nm blue-shift. In PmL the substitution N230S resulted in a typical red mutant (lambda(max) = 611 nm). The bioluminescence spectrum of all these luciferase mutants did not show altered pH-sensitivity nor considerably changed half-bandwidth in relation to the wild-type luciferases. Altogether present data suggest that Thr226 is an important residue for keeping active-site core in both groups of beetle luciferases. The mechanism for bioluminescence color determination between pH-sensitive and pH-insensitive luciferases could be different.     

Positive cooperativity in the functioning of molecular chaperone GroEL.

In the presence of its partner, GroES, the tetradecameric molecular chaperone GroEL binds 14 ATP molecules, half of which are hydrolyzed in a cooperative manner. Moreover GroEL can bind, with a positive cooperativity, more than two molecules of nonfolded protein rhodanese. The role of the cooperative mechanism in the functioning of GroEL is discussed.     

Glycosylation inhibits the interaction of invertase with the chaperone GroEL.

During refolding and reassociation of chemically denatured non-glycosylated invertase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, aggregation competes with correct folding, leading to low yields of reactivation (Kern et al. (1992) Protein Sci. 1, 120-131). In the presence of the chaperone GroEL, refolding is completely arrested. This suggests the formation of a stable complex between GroEL and non-native non-glycosylated invertase. Addition of MgATP results in a slow release of active invertase from the chaperone complex. When GroEL/ES and MgATP are present during refolding, the final reactivation yield increases from 14% to 36%. In contrast, refolding of the core-glycosylated and the high-mannose glycosylated forms of invertase is not arrested by GroEL. Only a short lag phase at the beginning of reactivation and a slightly increased reactivation yield (64% to 86% for core-glycosylated and 62% to 76% for external invertase) indicate a weak interaction of the glycosylated forms with the chaperone.     

Multiple structural transitions of the GroEL subunit are sensitive to intermolecular interactions with cochaperonin and refolding polypeptide

In this study we attempted to determine the specific roles of the numerous conformational changes that are observed in the bacterial chaperonin GroEL, by performing stopped-flow experiments on GroEL R231W in the presence of a refolding substrate protein. The apparent rate of one kinetic phase was decreased by approximately 25% in the presence of prebound unfolded malate dehydrogenase while another phase was suppressed completely under the same conditions, reflecting different effects of the unfolded protein on multiple structural transitions within GroEL. The addition of cochaperonin GroES counteracts the effect of the bound substrate protein in the former case, but had no effect on the latter, more extensive suppression. Using a chemically modified form of GroEL R231W which is incapable of releasing substrate proteins at low temperatures, we identified a conformational transition that is implicated in the release of substrate proteins. Parts of the actual process of substrate protein release were also observed through fluorescence resonance energy transfer experiments involving GroEL and labeled substrate protein. Analysis of the energy transfer data revealed an interesting relationship between substrate protein displacement and a specific structural transition in the GroEL apical domain.     

Thermodynamics of substrate binding to the chaperone SecB

The thermodynamics of binding of unfolded polypeptides to the chaperone SecB was investigated in vitro by isothermal titration calorimetry and fluorescence spectroscopy. The substrates were reduced and carboxamidomethylated forms of RNase A, BPTI, and alpha-lactalbumin. SecB binds both fully unfolded RNase A and BPTI as well as compact, partially folded disulfide intermediates of alpha-lactalbumin, which have 40-60% of native secondary structure. The heat capacity changes observed on binding the reduced and carboxamidomethylated forms of alpha-lactalbumin, BPTI, and RNase A were found to be -0.10, -0.29, and -0.41 kcal mol(-1) K(-1), respectively, and suggest that between 7 and 29 residues are buried upon substrate binding to SecB. In all cases, binding occurs with a stoichiometry of one polypeptide chain per monomer of SecB. There is no evidence for two separate types of binding sites for positively charged and hydrophobic ligands. Spectroscopic and proteolysis protection studies of the binding of SecB to poly-L-Lys show that binding of highly positively charged peptide ligands to negatively charged SecB leads to charge neutralization and subsequent aggregation of SecB. The data are consistent with a model where SecB binds substrate molecules at an exposed hydrophobic cleft. SecB aggregation in the absence of substrate is prevented by electrostatic repulsion between negatively charged SecB tetramers.     

Analysis of peptides and proteins in their binding to GroEL

The GroEL–GroES is an essential molecular chaperon system that assists protein folding in cell. Binding of various substrate proteins to GroEL is one of the key aspects in GroEL‐assisted protein folding. Small peptides may mimic segments of the substrate proteins in contact with GroEL and allow detailed structural analysis of the interactions. A model peptide SBP has been shown to bind to a region in GroEL that is important for binding of substrate proteins. Here, we investigated whether the observed GroEL–SBP interaction represented those of GroEL–substrate proteins, and whether SBP was able to mimic various aspects of substrate proteins in GroE‐assisted protein folding cycle. We found that SBP competed with substrate proteins, including α‐lactalbumin, rhodanese, and malate dehydrogenase, in binding to GroEL. SBP stimulated GroEL ATP hydrolysis rate in a manner similar to that of α‐lactalbumin. SBP did not prevent GroES from binding to GroEL, and GroES association reduced the ATPase rates of GroEL/SBP and GroEL/α‐lactalbumin to a comparable extent. Binding of both SBP and α‐lactalbumin to apo GroEL was dominated by hydrophobic interaction. Interestingly, association of α‐lactalbumin to GroEL/GroES was thermodynamically distinct from that to GroEL with reduced affinity and decreased contribution from hydrophobic interaction. However, SBP did not display such differential binding behaviors to apo GroEL and GroEL/GroES, likely due to the lack of a contiguous polypeptide chain that links all of the bound peptide fragments. Nevertheless, studies using peptides provide valuable information on the nature of GroEL–substrate protein interaction, which is central to understand the mechanism of GroEL‐assisted protein folding. Copyright © 2010 European Peptide Society and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Cobalt(2+) binding to human and tomato copper chaperone for superoxide dismutase: implications for the metal ion transfer mechanism

The copper chaperone for superoxide dismutase (CCS) gene encodes a protein that is believed to deliver copper ions specifically to copper-zinc superoxide dismutase (CuZnSOD). CCS proteins from different organisms share high sequence homology and consist of three distinct domains; a CuZnSOD-like central domain 2 flanked by domains 1 and 3, which contain putative metal-binding motifs. We report deduced protein sequences from tomato and Arabidopsis, the first functional homologues of CCS identified in plants. We have purified recombinant human (hCCS) and tomato (tCCS) copper chaperone proteins, as well as a truncated version of tCCS containing only domains 2 and 3. Their cobalt(2+) binding properties in the presence and absence of mercury(2+) were characterized by UV-vis and circular dichroism spectroscopies and it was shown that hCCS has the ability to bind two spectroscopically distinct cobalt ions whereas tCCS binds only one. The cobalt binding site that is common to both hCCS and tCCS displayed spectroscopic characteristics of cobalt(2+) bound to four or three cysteine ligands. There are only four cysteine residues in tCCS, two in domain 1 and two in domain 3; all four are conserved in other CCS sequences including hCCS. Thus, an interaction between domain 1 and domain 3 is concluded, and it may be important in the copper chaperone mechanism of these proteins.     

GroEL accelerates the refolding of hen lysozyme without changing its folding mechanism.

The chaperonin GroEL binds folding intermediates of four-disulfidehen lysozyme transiently within its central cavity. Using stopped flow fluorescence we show that GroEL binds early intermediates in folding and accelerates the slow kinetic phase that reflects the reversal of non-native interactions involving tryptophan residues and the formation of the native state. Pulsed hydrogen exchange monitored by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry demonstrates that GroEL does not alter the folding mechanism, nor are protected species unfolded by the chaperonin. The data suggest a mechanism for GroEL-assisted folding in which the reorganization of non-native tertiary interactions is facilitated but domain folding is unperturbed.     

Effect of hydrogen peroxide on the activity and structure of Escherichia coli chaperone GroEL

Chaperone GroEL was treated with different concentrations of hydrogen peroxide. The conformational states of GroEL were monitored by protein intrinsic fluorescence, 8-anilino-1-naphthalene sulfonate fluorescence, and far-UV CD measurements. The results show that GroEL has unusual ability to resist oxidative stress. GroEL kept its quaternary structure and activity even when treated with 10 mM hydrogen peroxide. Two fragments were formed when GroEL was treated with high concentrations of hydrogen peroxide (more than 20 mM). It is suggested that GroEL, as a molecular chaperone, is related to oxidative process in vivo.     

Interaction of the chaperone BiP with an antibody domain: implications for the chaperone cycle

BiP is an Hsp70 homologue found in the endoplasmic reticulum of eukaryotic cells. Like other Hsp70 chaperones, BiP interacts with its substrate proteins in an ATP-dependent manner. The functional analysis has so far been performed mainly with short, synthetic peptides. Here, we present an experimental system that allows to study the partial reactions of the BiP chaperone cycle for a natural substrate protein domain in its soluble, stably unfolded conformation. This unfolded antibody domain forms a binary complex with BiP in the absence of ATP. The dissociation of the BiP dimer seems to be the rate-limiting step in this reaction. The BiP-C(H)3 complexes dissociate rapidly in the presence of ATP. The affinity for BiP-binding peptides and the non-native antibody domain was determined to be similar, suggesting that only the peptide binding site is involved in these interactions. Furthermore, these results imply that, also in the context of the antibody domain, an extended peptide sequence is recognized. However, the accessibility of the BiP-binding site in the non-native protein seems to influence the kinetics of complex formation.