Functional Cooperation of the Interleukin-2 Receptor β Chain and Jak1 in Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase Recruitment and Phosphorylation

Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI 3-K) plays an important role in signaling via a wide range of receptors such as those for antigen, growth factors, and a number of cytokines, including interleukin-2 (IL-2). PI 3-K has been implicated in both IL-2-induced proliferation and prevention of apoptosis. A number of potential mechanisms for the recruitment of PI 3-K to the IL-2 receptor have been proposed. We now have found that tyrosine residues in the IL-2 receptor β chain (IL-2Rβ) are unexpectedly not required for the recruitment of the p85 component of PI 3-K. Instead, we find that Jak1, which associates with membrane-proximal regions of the IL-2Rβ cytoplasmic domain, is essential for efficient IL-2Rβ–p85 interaction, although some IL-2Rβ–p85 association can be seen in the absence of Jak1. We also found that Jak1 interacts with p85 in the absence of IL-2Rβ and that IL-2Rβ and Jak1 cooperate for the efficient recruitment and tyrosine phosphorylation of p85. This is the first report of a PI 3-K–Jak1 interaction, and it implicates Jak1 in an essential IL-2 signaling pathway distinct from the activation of STAT proteins.     

Jak2 acts as both a STAT1 kinase and as a molecular bridge linking STAT1 to the angiotensin II AT1 receptor

Angiotensin II activates the Jak-STAT pathway via the AT(1) receptor. We studied two mutant AT(1) receptors, termed M5 and M6, that contain Y to F substitutions for the tyrosine residues naturally found in the third intracellular loop and the carboxyl terminus. After binding ligand, both the M5 and M6 AT(1) receptors trigger STAT1 tyrosine phosphorylation equivalent to that observed with the wild type receptor, indicating that angiotensin II-mediated phosphorylation of STAT1 is independent of these receptor tyrosine residues. In response to angiotensin II, Jak2 autophosphorylates on tyrosine, and Jak2 and STAT1 physically associate, a process that depends on the SH2 domain of STAT1 in vitro. Evaluation of the wild type, M5, and M6 AT(1) receptors showed that angiotensin II-dependent AT(1) receptor-Jak2-STAT1 complex formation is dependent on catalytically active Jak2, not on the receptor tyrosine residues in the third intracellular loop and carboxyl tail. Immunodepletion of Jak2 virtually eliminated the ligand-dependent binding of STAT1 to the AT(1) receptor. These data indicate that the association of STAT1 with the AT(1) receptor is not strictly bimolecular; it requires Jak2 as both a STAT1 kinase and as a molecular bridge linking STAT1 to the AT(1) receptor.     

A Bipolar Clamp Mechanism for Activation of Jak-Family Protein Tyrosine Kinases

Most cell surface receptors for growth factors and cytokines dimerize in order to mediate signal transduction. For many such receptors, the Janus kinase (Jak) family of non-receptor protein tyrosine kinases are recruited in pairs and juxtaposed by dimerized receptor complexes in order to activate one another by trans-phosphorylation. An alternative mechanism for Jak trans-phosphorylation has been proposed in which the phosphorylated kinase interacts with the Src homology 2 (SH2) domain of SH2-B, a unique adaptor protein with the capacity to homo-dimerize. Building on a rule-based kinetic modeling approach that considers the concerted nature and combinatorial complexity of modular protein domain interactions, we examine these mechanisms in detail, focusing on the growth hormone (GH) receptor/Jak2/SH2-Bβ system. The modeling results suggest that, whereas Jak2-(SH2-Bβ)₂-Jak2 heterotetramers are scarcely expected to affect Jak2 phosphorylation, SH2-Bβ and dimerized receptors synergistically promote Jak2 trans-activation in the context of intracellular signaling. Analysis of the results revealed a unique mechanism whereby SH2-B and receptor dimers constitute a bipolar ‘clamp’ that stabilizes the active configuration of two Jak2 molecules in the same macro-complex.     

Marburg Virus Evades Interferon Responses by a Mechanism Distinct from Ebola Virus

Previous studies have demonstrated that Marburg viruses (MARV) and Ebola viruses (EBOV) inhibit interferon (IFN)-α/β signaling but utilize different mechanisms. EBOV inhibits IFN signaling via its VP24 protein which blocks the nuclear accumulation of tyrosine phosphorylated STAT1. In contrast, MARV infection inhibits IFNα/β induced tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT1 and STAT2. MARV infection is now demonstrated to inhibit not only IFNα/β but also IFNγ-induced STAT phosphorylation and to inhibit the IFNα/β and IFNγ-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of upstream Janus (Jak) family kinases. Surprisingly, the MARV matrix protein VP40, not the MARV VP24 protein, has been identified to antagonize Jak and STAT tyrosine phosphorylation, to inhibit IFNα/β or IFNγ-induced gene expression and to inhibit the induction of an antiviral state by IFNα/β. Global loss of STAT and Jak tyrosine phosphorylation in response to both IFNα/β and IFNγ is reminiscent of the phenotype seen in Jak1-null cells. Consistent with this model, MARV infection and MARV VP40 expression also inhibit the Jak1-dependent, IL-6-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT1 and STAT3. Finally, expression of MARV VP40 is able to prevent the tyrosine phosphorylation of Jak1, STAT1, STAT2 or STAT3 which occurs following over-expression of the Jak1 kinase. In contrast, MARV VP40 does not detectably inhibit the tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT2 or Tyk2 when Tyk2 is over-expressed. Mutation of the VP40 late domain, essential for efficient VP40 budding, has no detectable impact on inhibition of IFN signaling. This study shows that MARV inhibits IFN signaling by a mechanism different from that employed by the related EBOV. It identifies a novel function for the MARV VP40 protein and suggests that MARV may globally inhibit Jak1-dependent cytokine signaling.     

Two Distinct Calmodulin Binding Sites in the Third Intracellular Loop and Carboxyl Tail of Angiotensin II (AT1A) Receptor

In this study, we present data that support the presence of two distinct calmodulin binding sites within the angiotensin II receptor (AT_1A), at juxtamembrane regions of the N-terminus of the third intracellular loop (i3, amino acids 214–231) and carboxyl tail of the receptor (ct, 302–317). We used bioluminescence resonance energy transfer assays to document interactions of calmodulin with the AT_1A holo-receptor and GST-fusion protein pull-downs to demonstrate that i3 and ct interact with calmodulin in a Ca²⁺-dependent fashion. The former is a 1–12 motif and the latter belongs to 1-5-10 calmodulin binding motif. The apparent Kd of calmodulin for i3 is 177.0±9.1 nM, and for ct is 79.4±7.9 nM as assessed by dansyl-calmodulin fluorescence. Replacement of the tryptophan (W219) for alanine in i3, and phenylalanine (F309 or F313) for alanine in ct reduced their binding affinities for calmodulin, as predicted by computer docking simulations. Exogenously applied calmodulin attenuated interactions between G protein βγ subunits and i3 and ct, somewhat more so for ct than i3. Mutations W219A, F309A, and F313A did not alter Gβγ binding, but reduced the ability of calmodulin to compete with Gβγ, suggesting that calmodulin and Gβγ have overlapping, but not identical, binding requirements for i3 and ct. Calmodulin interference with the Gβγ binding to i3 and ct regions of the AT_1A receptor strongly suggests that calmodulin plays critical roles in regulating Gβγ-dependent signaling of the receptor.     

Forskolin-inducible cAMP Pathway Negatively Regulates T-cell Proliferation by Uncoupling the Interleukin-2 Receptor Complex

Cytokine-mediated regulation of T-cell activity involves a complex interplay between key signal transduction pathways. Determining how these signaling pathways cross-talk is essential to understanding T-cell function and dysfunction. In this work, we provide evidence that cross-talk exists between at least two signaling pathways: the Jak3/Stat5 and cAMP-mediated cascades. The adenylate cyclase activator forskolin (Fsk) significantly increased intracellular cAMP levels and reduced proliferation of the human T-cells via inhibition of cell cycle regulatory genes but did not induce apoptosis. To determine this inhibitory mechanism, effects of Fsk on IL-2 signaling was investigated. Fsk treatment of MT-2 and Kit 225 T-cells inhibited IL-2-induced Stat5a/b tyrosine and serine phosphorylation, nuclear translocation, and DNA binding activity. Fsk treatment also uncoupled IL-2 induced association of the IL-2Rβ and γ_c chain, consequently blocking Jak3 activation. Interestingly, phosphoamino acid analysis revealed that Fsk-treated cells resulted in elevated serine phosphorylation of Jak3 but not Stat5, suggesting that Fsk can negatively regulate Jak3 activity possibly mediated through PKA. Indeed, in vitro kinase assays and small molecule inhibition studies indicated that PKA can directly serine phosphorylate and functionally inactivate Jak3. Taken together, these findings suggest that Fsk activation of adenylate cyclase and PKA can negatively regulate IL-2 signaling at multiple levels that include IL-2R complex formation and Jak3/Stat5 activation.     

Receptor Density Is Key to the Alpha2/Beta Interferon Differential Activities

Multiple type I interferons (IFN-α/β) elicit Jak/Stat activation, rapid gene induction, and pleiotropic effects, such as differentiation, antiviral protection, and blocks in proliferation, which are dependent on the IFN subtype and the cellular context. To date, ligand- and receptor-specific molecular determinants underlying IFN-α/β differential activities or potencies have been well characterized. To analyze cellular determinants that impact subtype-specific potency, human fibrosarcoma U5A-derived clones, exhibiting a gradient of IFN sensitivity by virtue of increasing receptor levels, were monitored for Jak/Stat signaling, gene induction, cell cycle lengthening, and apoptosis. In cells with scarce receptors, IFN-β was more potent than IFN-α2 in antiproliferative activity, while the two subtypes were equipotent in all other readouts. Conversely, in cells with abundant receptors, IFN-α2 matched or even surpassed IFN-β in all readouts tested. Our results suggest that the differential activities of the IFN subtypes are dictated not only by the intrinsic ligand/receptor binding kinetics but also by the density of cell surface receptor components.A persistent question in the field of helically bundled cytokines concerns the molecular basis of intracellular signal activation following binding to cognate cell surface receptors. Typically, cytokine-induced dimerization of the receptor subunits is thought to trigger catalytic transactivation of the associated Jak tyrosine kinases. Phosphorylation of critical receptor tyrosine motifs by the activated Jak proteins allows recruitment and activation of downstream Stat effectors (25, 34). A clear distinction can be made between the short homodimeric Jak2-activating receptors, such as the growth hormone or the erythropoietin receptors, and the more complex heteromeric receptors. Among these latter is the type I interferon (IFN) receptor, a prototypic class 2 receptor, made of two subunits, each associated with a different Jak enzyme (29). IFNAR2 contains extracellularly two fibronectin III domains forming a well-defined cytokine binding module. The cytoplasmic region of IFNAR2 is 250 amino acids long, interacts with Jak1, and contains two principal Tyr-based Stat recruitment motifs (24, 35). IFNAR1 is made of a large ectodomain of four fibronectin III domains, not all involved in ligand binding, and a 100-amino-acid-long cytoplasmic region complexed with Tyk2 and subjected to ligand-induced ubiquitination driving receptor proteolysis (13, 14).A large array of IFNs (over a dozen α subtypes and one β subtype) bind to this ubiquitously expressed receptor complex to induce rapid gene expression programs that elicit measurable antiviral responses and cell growth inhibition as well as cell context-specific functional changes (4, 31). Several studies have reported on differential activities of type I IFNs, but no unique function has ever been attributed to a given subtype (see references in reference 29). Thus, a differential can be defined as a lack of correlation between two specific activities. For instance, depending on the cell system, IFN-α2 and IFN-β can exhibit equivalent antiproliferative potency or over a 100-fold difference in antiproliferative potency and nearly equipotency in antiviral activity. Since no overt differences are observed in the structure or stoichiometry of the ligand-receptor complex formed with different subtypes, the concordant view points to the way each IFN subtype engages the available receptors. Indeed, kinetic measurements of the interaction of IFN-α2 and IFN-β with receptor ectodomains have shown substantial differences. IFNAR2 represents the high-affinity subunit, toward which IFN-α2 exhibits nanomolar binding affinity and IFN-β exhibits ∼100 pM binding affinity. Conversely, IFNAR1 is the low-affinity subunit, toward which IFN-α2 exhibits micromolar affinity and IFN-β ∼50 nM affinity (19, 22). The contribution of the individual and combined affinities on ternary complex formation by either IFN subtype have been thoroughly studied (10, 26). However, how these dynamic parameters influence receptor function and translate into activation of Jak, recruitment of Stats and additional effectors, gene induction, and bioactivities remains ill defined.Rather than focusing on ligand and receptor determinants, here we investigated the relationship between receptor subunit levels and IFN-α2 versus IFN-β signaling and functional outcomes (IFN-α2/β differential potencies). Since we previously showed that no simple relationship between receptor levels and Jak/Stat signaling can be inferred by comparing different cell types (18), we have used a reductionist approach in a single cell type, from which we have engineered and studied clones expressing low or abundant receptor levels. We show that the density of receptors at the cell surface represents a critical determinant of the level of differential activity exhibited by two IFN subtypes.     

A Unified Model of the GABAA Receptor Comprising Agonist and Benzodiazepine Binding Sites

We present a full-length α₁β₂γ₂ GABA receptor model optimized for agonists and benzodiazepine (BZD) allosteric modulators. We propose binding hypotheses for the agonists GABA, muscimol and THIP and for the allosteric modulator diazepam (DZP). The receptor model is primarily based on the glutamate-gated chloride channel (GluCl) from C. elegans and includes additional structural information from the prokaryotic ligand-gated ion channel ELIC in a few regions. Available mutational data of the binding sites are well explained by the model and the proposed ligand binding poses. We suggest a GABA binding mode similar to the binding mode of glutamate in the GluCl X-ray structure. Key interactions are predicted with residues α₁R66, β₂T202, α₁T129, β₂E155, β₂Y205 and the backbone of β₂S156. Muscimol is predicted to bind similarly, however, with minor differences rationalized with quantum mechanical energy calculations. Muscimol key interactions are predicted to be α₁R66, β₂T202, α₁T129, β₂E155, β₂Y205 and β₂F200. Furthermore, we argue that a water molecule could mediate further interactions between muscimol and the backbone of β₂S156 and β₂Y157. DZP is predicted to bind with interactions comparable to those of the agonists in the orthosteric site. The carbonyl group of DZP is predicted to interact with two threonines α₁T206 and γ₂T142, similar to the acidic moiety of GABA. The chlorine atom of DZP is placed near the important α₁H101 and the N-methyl group near α₁Y159, α₁T206, and α₁Y209. We present a binding mode of DZP in which the pending phenyl moiety of DZP is buried in the binding pocket and thus shielded from solvent exposure. Our full length GABA_A receptor is made available as Model S1.     

Receptor specific downregulation of cytokine signaling by autophosphorylation in the FERM domain of Jak2

The tyrosine kinase, Janus kinase-2 (Jak2), plays a pivotal role in signal transduction through a variety of cytokine receptors, including the receptor for erythropoietin (Epo). Although the physiological relevance of Jak2 has been definitively established, less is known about its regulation. In studies assessing the roles of sites of tyrosine phosphorylation, we identified Y(119) in the FERM (band 4.1, Ezrin, radixin and moesin) domain as a phosphorylation site. In these studies, we demonstrate that the phosphorylation of Y(119) in response to Epo downregulates Jak2 kinase activity. Using a phosphorylation mimic mutation (Y(119)E), downregulation is shown to involve dissociation of Jak2 from the receptor complex. Conversely, a Y(119)F mutant is more stably associated with the receptor complex. Thus, in cytokine responses, ligand binding induces activation of receptor associated Jak2, autophosphorylation of Y(119) in the FERM domain and the subsequent dissociation of the activated Jak2 from the receptor and degradation. This regulation occurs with the receptors for Epo, thrombopoietin and growth hormone but not with the receptor for interferon-gamma.     

Mutation of Three Residues in the Third Intracellular Loop of the Dopamine D2 Receptor Creates an Internalization-defective Receptor

Arrestins mediate desensitization and internalization of G protein-coupled receptors and also direct receptor signaling toward heterotrimeric G protein-independent signaling pathways. We previously identified a four-residue segment (residues 212–215) of the dopamine D2 receptor that is necessary for arrestin binding in an in vitro heterologous expression system but that also impairs receptor expression. We now describe the characterization of additional mutations at that arrestin binding site in the third intracellular loop. Mutating two (residues 214 and 215) or three (residues 213–215) of the four residues to alanine partially decreased agonist-induced recruitment of arrestin3 without altering activation of a G protein. Arrestin-dependent receptor internalization, which requires arrestin binding to β2-adaptin (the β2 subunit of the clathrin-associated adaptor protein AP2) and clathrin, was disproportionately affected by the three-residue mutation, with no agonist-induced internalization observed even in the presence of overexpressed arrestin or G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2. The disjunction between arrestin recruitment and internalization could not be explained by alterations in the time course of the receptor-arrestin interaction, the recruitment of G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2, or the receptor-induced interaction between arrestin and β2-adaptin, suggesting that the mutation impairs a property of the internalization complex that has not yet been identified.     

The Insulin Receptor: Both a Prototypical and Atypical Receptor Tyrosine Kinase

Unlike prototypical receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), which are single-chain polypeptides, the insulin receptor (InsR) is a preformed, covalently linked tetramer with two extracellular α subunits and two membrane-spanning, tyrosine kinase-containing β subunits. A single molecule of insulin binds asymmetrically to the ectodomain, triggering a conformational change that is transmitted to the cytoplasmic kinase domains, which facilitates their trans-phosphorylation. As in prototypical RTKs, tyrosine phosphorylation in the juxtamembrane region of InsR creates recruitment sites for downstream signaling proteins (IRS [InsR substrate] proteins, Shc) containing a phosphotyrosine-binding (PTB) domain, and tyrosine phosphorylation in the kinase activation loop stimulates InsR’s catalytic activity. For InsR, phosphorylation of the activation loop, which contains three tyrosine residues, also creates docking sites for adaptor proteins (Grb10/14, SH2B2) that possess specialized Src homology-2 (SH2) domains, which are dimeric and engage two phosphotyrosines in the activation loop.Insulin is a highly potent anabolic hormone that is critical for tissue development and for glucose homeostasis (Taniguchi et al. 2006). Released from the β cells of the pancreas, insulin regulates glucose output from the liver and glucose uptake into (primarily) skeletal muscle and adipose tissue. In addition, insulin promotes the synthesis and storage of carbohydrates, lipids, and protein. Insulin’s actions are mediated by the insulin receptor (InsR), a plasma membrane-resident glycoprotein and member of the receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) family. Other members of the InsR subfamily of RTKs include the insulinlike growth factor-1 receptor (IGF1R) and insulin receptor-related receptor, the latter of which has no known ligand. As an RTK, InsR is ligand-activated through mechanisms that are both prototypical and atypical of RTKs. These mechanisms will be the focus of this article.     

γ-Secretase Activity Is Required for Regulated Intramembrane Proteolysis of Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Receptor 1 and TNF-mediated Pro-apoptotic Signaling

The γ-secretase protease and associated regulated intramembrane proteolysis play an important role in controlling receptor-mediated intracellular signaling events, which have a central role in Alzheimer disease, cancer progression, and immune surveillance. An increasing number of γ-secretase substrates have a role in cytokine signaling, including the IL-6 receptor, IL-1 receptor type I, and IL-1 receptor type II. In this study, we show that following TNF-converting enzyme-mediated ectodomain shedding of TNF type I receptor (TNFR1), the membrane-bound TNFR1 C-terminal fragment is subsequently cleaved by γ-secretase to generate a cytosolic TNFR1 intracellular domain. We also show that clathrin-mediated internalization of TNFR1 C-terminal fragment is a prerequisite for efficient γ-secretase cleavage of TNFR1. Furthermore, using in vitro and in vivo model systems, we show that in the absence of presenilin expression and γ-secretase activity, TNF-mediated JNK activation was prevented, assembly of the TNFR1 pro-apoptotic complex II was reduced, and TNF-induced apoptosis was inhibited. These observations demonstrate that TNFR1 is a γ-secretase substrate and suggest that γ-secretase cleavage of TNFR1 represents a new layer of regulation that links the presenilins and the γ-secretase protease to pro-inflammatory cytokine signaling.     

Role of Tyrosine Phosphorylation in Ligand-induced Regulation of Transcytosis of the Polymeric Ig Receptor

The polymeric Ig receptor (pIgR) transcytoses its ligand, dimeric IgA (dIgA), from the basolateral to the apical surface of epithelial cells. Although the pIgR is constitutively transcytosed in the absence of ligand, binding of dIgA stimulates transcytosis of the pIgR. We recently reported that dIgA binding to the pIgR induces translocation of protein kinase C, production of inositol triphosphate, and elevation of intracellular free calcium. We now report that dIgA binding causes rapid, transient tyrosine phosphorylation of several proteins, including phosphatidyl inositol-specific phospholipase C-γl. Protein tyrosine kinase inhibitors or deletion of the last 30 amino acids of pIgR cytoplasmic tail prevents IgA-stimulated protein tyrosine kinase activation, tyrosine phosphorylation of phospholipase C-γl, production of inositol triphosphate, and the stimulation of transcytosis by dIgA. Analysis of pIgR deletion mutants reveals that the same discrete portion of the cytoplasmic domain, residues 727–736 (but not the Tyr734), controls both the ability of pIgR to cause dIgA-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of the phospholipase C-γl and to undergo dIgA-stimulated transcytosis. In addition, dIgA transcytosis can be strongly stimulated by mimicking phospholipase C-γl activation. In combination with our previous results, we conclude that the protein tyrosine kinase(s) and phospholipase C-γl that are activated upon dIgA binding to the pIgR control dIgA-stimulated pIgR transcytosis.     

Huntingtin-Interacting Protein 1 Phosphorylation by Receptor Tyrosine Kinases

Huntingtin-interacting protein 1 (HIP1) binds inositol lipids, clathrin, actin, and receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs). HIP1 is elevated in many tumors, and its expression is prognostic in prostate cancer. HIP1 overexpression increases levels of the RTK epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and transforms fibroblasts. Here we report that HIP1 is tyrosine phosphorylated in the presence of EGFR and platelet-derived growth factor β receptor (PDGFβR) as well as the oncogenic derivatives EGFRvIII, HIP1/PDGFβR (H/P), and TEL/PDGFβR (T/P). We identified a four-tyrosine “HIP1 phosphorylation motif” (HPM) in the N-terminal region of HIP1 that is required for phosphorylation mediated by both EGFR and PDGFβR but not by the oncoproteins H/P and T/P. We also identified a tyrosine residue (Y152) within the HPM motif of HIP1 that inhibits HIP1 tyrosine phosphorylation. The HPM tyrosines are conserved in HIP1''s only known mammalian relative, HIP1-related protein (HIP1r), and are also required for HIP1r phosphorylation. Tyrosine-to-phenylalanine point mutations in the HPM of HIP1 result in proapoptotic activity, indicating that an intact HPM may be necessary for HIP1''s role in cellular survival. These data suggest that phosphorylation of HIP1 by RTKs in an N-terminal region contributes to the promotion of cellular survival.     

Endothelial Nitric-oxide Synthase (eNOS) Is Activated through G-protein-coupled Receptor Kinase-interacting Protein 1 (GIT1) Tyrosine Phosphorylation and Src Protein

Nitric oxide (NO) is a critical regulator of vascular tone and plays an especially prominent role in liver by controlling portal blood flow and pressure within liver sinusoids. Synthesis of NO in sinusoidal endothelial cells by endothelial nitric-oxide synthase (eNOS) is regulated in response to activation of endothelial cells by vasoactive signals such as endothelins. The endothelin B (ET_B) receptor is a G-protein-coupled receptor, but the mechanisms by which it regulates eNOS activity in sinusoidal endothelial cells are not well understood. In this study, we built on two previous strands of work, the first showing that G-protein βγ subunits mediated activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and Akt to regulate eNOS and the second showing that eNOS directly bound to the G-protein-coupled receptor kinase-interacting protein 1 (GIT1) scaffold protein, and this association stimulated NO production. Here we investigated the mechanisms by which the GIT1-eNOS complex is formed and regulated. GIT1 was phosphorylated on tyrosine by Src, and Y293F and Y554F mutations reduced GIT1 phosphorylation as well as the ability of GIT1 to bind to and activate eNOS. Akt phosphorylation activated eNOS (at Ser¹¹⁷⁷), and Akt also regulated the ability of Src to phosphorylate GIT1 as well as GIT1-eNOS association. These pathways were activated by endothelin-1 through the ET_B receptor; inhibiting receptor-activated G-protein βγ subunits blocked activation of Akt, GIT1 tyrosine phosphorylation, and ET-1-stimulated GIT1-eNOS association but did not affect Src activation. These data suggest a model in which Src and Akt cooperate to regulate association of eNOS with the GIT1 scaffold to facilitate NO production.     

Delimiting the Binding Site for Quaternary Ammonium Lidocaine Derivatives in the Acetylcholine Receptor Channel

The triethylammonium QX-314 and the trimethylammonium QX-222 are lidocaine derivatives that act as open-channel blockers of the acetylcholine (ACh) receptor. When bound, these blockers should occlude some of the residues lining the channel. Eight residues in the second membrane-spanning segment (M2) of the mouse-muscle α subunit were mutated one at a time to cysteine and expressed together with wild-type β, γ, and δ subunits in Xenopus oocytes. The rate constant for the reaction of each substituted cysteine with 2-aminoethyl methanethiosulfonate (MTSEA) was determined from the time course of the irreversible effect of MTSEA on the ACh-induced current. The reactions were carried out in the presence and absence of ACh and in the presence and absence of QX-314 and QX-222. These blockers had no effect on the reactions in the absence of ACh. In the presence of ACh, both blockers retarded the reaction of extracellularly applied MTSEA with cysteine substituted for residues from αVal255, one third of the distance in from the extracellular end of M2, to αGlu241, flanking the intracellular end of M2, but not with cysteine substituted for αLeu258 or αGlu262, at the extracellular end of M2. The reactions of MTSEA with cysteines substituted for αLeu258 and αGlu262 were considerably faster in the presence of ACh than in its absence. That QX-314 and QX-222 did not protect αL258C and αE262C against reaction with MTSEA in the presence of ACh implies that protection of the other residues was due to occlusion of the channel and not to the promotion of a less reactive state from a remote site. Given the 12-Å overall length of the blockers and the α-helical conformation of M2 in the open state, the binding site for both blockers extends from αVal255 down to αSer248.     

Activation and association of the Tec tyrosine kinase with the human prolactin receptor: mapping of a Tec/Vav1-receptor binding site

Stimulation of the PRL receptor (PRLr) results in the activation of the guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) p95Vav1 with corresponding alterations in cytoarchitecture and cell motility. To better understand the mechanisms involved in the regulation of Vav1 activity, the role of the tyrosine kinase p70Tec was examined. Coimmunoprecipitation and in vitro kinase assays revealed that ligand stimulation of the PRLr resulted in the rapid activation of Tec and its concomitant association with the PRLR: When coexpressed in COS-1 cells, both Vav1 and Tec were found to associate with the PRLr in the presence of ligand. In the absence of receptor, a constitutive complex between Vav1 and Tec was noted. Both Vav1 and Tec, however, were capable of independent engagement of a bipartite intracellular domain of the PRLR: Deletion mapping studies confined this interaction to residues 323 to 527 of the intracellular domain of the PRLR: Furthermore, Tec enhanced the GEF activity of Vav1 as evidenced by an increase in GTP-bound Rac1. These data would suggest a pivotal function for the formation of a Tec/Vav1/PRLr complex during PRL-driven signal transduction, given the role of Vav1 in the control of cell proliferation and the regulation of Rho family-mediated cytoskeletal alterations.     

Constitutive Gαi Coupling Activity of Very Large G Protein-coupled Receptor 1 (VLGR1) and Its Regulation by PDZD7 Protein

The very large G protein-coupled receptor 1 (VLGR1) is a core component in inner ear hair cell development. Mutations in the vlgr1 gene cause Usher syndrome, the symptoms of which include congenital hearing loss and progressive retinitis pigmentosa. However, the mechanism of VLGR1-regulated intracellular signaling and its role in Usher syndrome remain elusive. Here, we show that VLGR1 is processed into two fragments after autocleavage at the G protein-coupled receptor proteolytic site. The cleaved VLGR1 β-subunit constitutively inhibited adenylate cyclase (AC) activity through Gα_i coupling. Co-expression of the Gα_iq chimera with the VLGR1 β-subunit changed its activity to the phospholipase C/nuclear factor of activated T cells signaling pathway, which demonstrates the Gα_i protein coupling specificity of this subunit. An R6002A mutation in intracellular loop 2 of VLGR1 abolished Gα_i coupling, but the pathogenic VLGR1 Y6236fsx1 mutant showed increased AC inhibition. Furthermore, overexpression of another Usher syndrome protein, PDZD7, decreased the AC inhibition of the VLGR1 β-subunit but showed no effect on the VLGR1 Y6236fsx1 mutant. Taken together, we identified an independent Gα_i signaling pathway of the VLGR1 β-subunit and its regulatory mechanisms that may have a role in the development of Usher syndrome.