Oncolytic Immunotherapy: Can’t Start a Fire Without a Spark

Recent advances in cancer immunotherapy have renewed interest in oncolytic viruses (OVs) as a synergistic platform for the development of novel antitumor strategies. Cancer cells adopt multiple mechanisms to evade and suppress antitumor immune responses, essentially establishing a non-immunogenic (‘cold’) tumor microenvironment (TME), with poor T-cell infiltration and low mutational burden. Limitations to the efficacy of immunotherapy still exist, especially for a variety of solid tumors, where new approaches are necessary to overcome physical barriers in the TME and to mitigate adverse effects associated with current immunotherapeutics. OVs offer an attractive alternative by inducing direct oncolysis, immunogenic cell death, and immune stimulation. These multimodal mechanisms make OVs well suited to reprogram non-immunogenic tumors and TME into inflamed, immunogenic (‘hot’) tumors; enhanced release of tumor antigens by dying cancer cells is expected to augment T-cell infiltration, thereby eliciting potent antitumor immunity. Advances in virus engineering and understanding of tumor biology have allowed the optimization of OV-tumor selectivity, oncolytic potency, and immune stimulation. However, OV antitumor activity is likely to achieve its greatest potential as part of combinatorial strategies with other immune or cancer therapeutics.     

The emergence of combinatorial strategies in the development of RNA oncolytic virus therapies

Oncolytic viruses (OVs) represent an exciting new biological approach to cancer therapy. In particular, RNA viruses have emerged as potent agents for oncolytic virotherapy because of their capacity to specifically target and destroy tumour cells while sparing normal cells and tissues. Several barriers remain in the development of OV therapy, including poor penetration into the tumour mass, inefficient virus replication in primary cancers, and tumour-specific resistance to OV-mediated killing. The combination of OVs with cytotoxic agents, such as small molecule inhibitors of signalling or immunomodulators, as well as stealth delivery of therapeutic viruses have shown promise as novel experimental strategies to overcome resistance to viral oncolysis. These agents complement OV therapy by unblocking host pathways, delivering viruses with greater efficiency and/or increasing virus proliferation at the tumour site. In this review, we summarize recent development of these concepts, the potential obstacles, and future prospects for the clinical utilization of RNA OVs in cancer therapy.     

A rational relationship: Oncolytic virus vaccines as functional partners for adoptive T cell therapy

Tumours employ a variety of immune-evasion and suppression mechanisms to impair development of functional tumor-specific T cells and subvert T cell-mediated immunity in the tumour microenvironment. Adoptive T cell therapy (ACT) aims to overcome these barriers and overwhelm tumor defenses with a bolus of T cells that were selectively expanded ex vivo. Although this strategy has been effective in liquid tumors and melanomas, many tumors appear to be resistant to ACT. Several factors are thought to play into this resistance, including poor engraftment and persistence of transferred cells, tumour cell heterogeneity and antigen loss, poor immune cell recruitment and infiltration into the tumour, and susceptibility to local immunosuppression in the tumor microenvironment. Oncolytic viruses (OV) have been identified as powerful stimulators of the anti-tumour immune response. As such, OVs are inherently well-positioned to act in synergy with ACT to bolster the anti-tumour T cell response. Further, OV vaccines, wherein tumour-associated antigens are encoded into the viral backbone, have proven to be remarkable in boosting antigen-specific T cell response. Pre-clinical studies have revealed remarkable therapeutic outcomes when OV vaccines are paired with ACT. In this scenario, OV vaccines are thought to function in a “push and pull” manner, where push refers to expanding T cells in the periphery and pull refers to recruiting those cells into the tumour that has been rendered amenable to T cell attack by the actions of the OV. In this review, we discuss barriers that limit eradication of tumors by T cells, highlight attributes of OVs that break down these barriers and present strategies for rational combinations of ACT with OV vaccines.     

Double trouble for tumours: Exploiting the tumour microenvironment to enhance anticancer effect of oncolytic viruses

Oncolytic viruses (OVs) are selected based on their ability to eliminate malignancies by direct infection and lysis of cancer cells. Originally, OVs were designed to target malignancies by taking advantage of the defects of cancer cells observed in vitro. Subsequent analysis of virus delivery and spread in vivo has demonstrated that the tumour microenvironment can impede the ability of OVs to effectively infect and spread. Despite this limitation, it is becoming increasingly evident that OVs are also able to take advantage of certain features of the tumour microenvironment. Currently, a growing body of the literature is delineating the complex interaction between OVs and the tumour microenvironment that results in an additional therapeutic activity; these viruses are able to target malignancies by rapidly altering the tumour microenvironment into a milieu that potentiates anticancer activity. Herein, we discuss strategies that capitalize on the multifaceted relationship between OVs and host–tumour interactions that enhance the toxicity of OVs to the tumour microenvironment.     

Oncolytic virotherapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A glimmer of hope after years of disappointment?

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most aggressive and highly lethal malignancies. Existing therapeutic interventions have so far been unsuccessful in improving prognosis, and survival remains very poor. Oncolytic virotherapy represents a promising, yet not fully explored, alternative strategy for the treatment of PDAC. Oncolytic viruses (OVs) infect, replicate within and lyse tumor cells specifically and stimulate antitumor immune responses. Multiple challenges have hampered the efficacy of oncolytic virotherapy for PDAC, the most significant being the desmoplastic and immunosuppressive pancreatic tumor microenvironment (TME). The TME limits the access of therapeutic drugs and the infiltration of effector T cells and natural killer (NK) cells into the tumor mass. Additionally, cancer cells promote the secretion of immunosuppressive factors and develop mechanisms to evade the host immune system. Because of their oncolytic and immune-stimulating properties, OVs are the ideal candidates for counteracting the pancreatic immunosuppressive TME and for designing combination therapies that can be clinically exploited in clinical trials that seek to improve the prognosis of PDAC.     

The pros and cons of interferons for oncolytic virotherapy

Interferons (IFN) are potent immune stimulators that play key roles in both innate and adaptive immune responses. They are considered the first line of defense against viral pathogens and can even be used as treatments to boost the immune system. While viruses are usually seen as a threat to the host, an emerging class of cancer therapeutics exploits the natural capacity of some viruses to directly infect and kill cancer cells. The cancer-specificity of these bio-therapeutics, called oncolytic viruses (OVs), often relies on defective IFN responses that are frequently observed in cancer cells, therefore increasing their vulnerability to viruses compared to healthy cells. To ensure the safety of the therapy, many OVs have been engineered to further activate the IFN response. As a consequence of this IFN over-stimulation, the virus is cleared faster by the immune system, which limits direct oncolysis. Importantly, the therapeutic activity of OVs also relies on their capacity to trigger anti-tumor immunity and IFNs are key players in this aspect. Here, we review the complex cancer–virus–anti-tumor immunity interplay and discuss the diverse functions of IFNs for each of these processes.     

溶瘤病毒调控肿瘤微环境及联合治疗的研究进展

溶瘤病毒是一类天然的或经改造后获得具有靶向杀伤癌细胞能力的病毒,除了能特异性杀伤肿瘤细胞外,经改造后的溶瘤病毒对肿瘤微环境的调控作用也会影响其最终疗效.通过调控肿瘤微环境中肿瘤细胞抗原的表达、免疫抑制状态、肿瘤相关成纤维细胞及肿瘤血管新生等,溶瘤病毒为肿瘤的治疗提供了更为系统的治疗策略;联合免疫检查点抑制剂的使用能使两者获得协同和互补的功效,进一步提升了肿瘤全面和有效的治疗.本文将对溶瘤病毒对肿瘤微环境调控作用及联合治疗的研究进展进行综述.     

The two-faces of NK cells in oncolytic virotherapy

Oncolytic viruses (OVs) are immunotherapeutics capable of directly killing cancer cells and with potent immunostimulatory properties. OVs exert their antitumor effect, at least partially, by activating the antitumor immune response, of which NK cells are an important component. However, if on the one hand increasing evidence revealed that NK cells are important mediators of oncolytic virotherapy, on the other hand, NK cells have evolved to fight viral infections, and therefore they can have a detrimental effect for the efficacy of OVs. In this review, we will discuss the dichotomy between the antitumor and antiviral functions of NK cells related to oncolytic virotherapy. We will also review NK cell-based and OV-based therapies, engineered OVs aimed at enhancing immune stimulation, and combination therapies involving OVs and NK cells currently used in cancer immunotherapy.     

Tumour vasculature: Friend or foe of oncolytic viruses?

In the past two decades there have been substantial advances in understanding the anti-cancer mechanisms of oncolytic viruses (OVs). OVs can mediate their effects directly, by preferentially infecting and killing tumour cells. Additionally, OVs can indirectly generate anti-tumour immune responses. These differing mechanisms have led to a paradoxical divergence in strategies employed to further increase the potency of oncolytic virotherapies. On one hand, the tumour neovasculature is seen as a vital lifeline to the survival of the tumour, leading some to use OVs to target the tumour vasculature in hopes to starve cancers. Therapeutics causing vascular collapse can potentiate tumour hypoxia, nutrient restriction and pro-inflammatory cytokine release, which has shown promise in oncological studies. On the other hand, the same vasculature plays an important role for the dissemination of OVs, trafficking of effector cells and other therapeutics, which has prompted researchers to find ways of normalizing the vasculature to enhance infiltration of leukocytes and delivery of therapeutic agents. This article describes the recent developments of therapies aimed to shut down versus normalize tumour vasculature in order to inform researchers striving to optimize OV-based therapies.     

Oncolytic virotherapy: molecular targets in tumor-selective replication and carrier cell-mediated delivery of oncolytic viruses

Tremendous advances have been made in developing oncolytic viruses (OVs) in the last few years. By taking advantage of current knowledge in cancer biology and virology, specific OVs have been genetically engineered to target specific molecules or signal transduction pathways in cancer cells in order to achieve efficient and selective replication. The viral infection and amplification eventually induce cancer cells into cell death pathways and elicit host antitumor immune responses to further help eliminate cancer cells. Specifically targeted molecules or signaling pathways (such as RB/E2F/p16, p53, IFN, PKR, EGFR, Ras, Wnt, anti-apoptosis or hypoxia) in cancer cells or tumor microenvironment have been studied and dissected with a variety of OVs such as adenovirus, herpes simplex virus, poxvirus, vesicular stomatitis virus, measles virus, Newcastle disease virus, influenza virus and reovirus, setting the molecular basis for further improvements in the near future. Another exciting new area of research has been the harnessing of naturally tumor-homing cells as carrier cells (or cellular vehicles) to deliver OVs to tumors. The trafficking of these tumor-homing cells (stem cells, immune cells and cancer cells), which support proliferation of the viruses, is mediated by specific chemokines and cell adhesion molecules and we are just beginning to understand the roles of these molecules. Finally, we will highlight some avenues deserving further study in order to achieve the ultimate goals of utilizing various OVs for effective cancer treatment.     

From Scourge to Cure: Tumour-Selective Viral Pathogenesis as a New Strategy against Cancer

Tumour mutations corrupt cellular pathways, and accumulate to disrupt, dysregulate, and ultimately avoid mechanisms of cellular control. Yet the very changes that tumour cells undergo to secure their own growth success also render them susceptible to viral infection. Enhanced availability of surface receptors, disruption of antiviral sensing, elevated metabolic activity, disengagement of cell cycle controls, hyperactivation of mitogenic pathways, and apoptotic avoidance all render the malignant cell environment highly supportive to viral replication. The therapeutic use of oncolytic viruses (OVs) with a natural tropism for infecting and subsequently lysing tumour cells is a rapidly progressing area of cancer research. While many OVs exhibit an inherent degree of tropism for transformed cells, this can be further promoted through pharmacological interventions and/or the introduction of viral mutations that generate recombinant oncolytic viruses adapted to successfully replicate only in a malignant cellular environment. Such adaptations that augment OV tumour selectivity are already improving the therapeutic outlook for cancer, and there remains tremendous untapped potential for further innovation.     

Modifying the tumour microenvironment and reverting tumour cells: New strategies for treating malignant tumours

The tumour microenvironment (TME) plays a pivotal role in tumour fate determination. The TME acts together with the genetic material of tumour cells to determine their initiation, metastasis and drug resistance. Stromal cells in the TME promote the growth and metastasis of tumour cells by secreting soluble molecules or exosomes. The abnormal microenvironment reduces immune surveillance and tumour killing. The TME causes low anti‐tumour drug penetration and reactivity and high drug resistance. Tumour angiogenesis and microenvironmental hypoxia limit the drug concentration within the TME and enhance the stemness of tumour cells. Therefore, modifying the TME to effectively attack tumour cells could represent a comprehensive and effective anti‐tumour strategy. Normal cells, such as stem cells and immune cells, can penetrate and disrupt the abnormal TME. Reconstruction of the TME with healthy cells is an exciting new direction for tumour treatment. We will elaborate on the mechanism of the TME to support tumours and the current cell therapies for targeting tumours and the TME—such as immune cell therapies, haematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation therapies, mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) transfer and embryonic stem cell‐based microenvironment therapies—to provide novel ideas for producing breakthroughs in tumour therapy strategies.     

Immunotherapeutic approaches in Hepatocellular carcinoma: Building blocks of hope in near future

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common type of primary hepatic cancer and is among the major causes of mortality due to cancer. Due to the lack of efficient conventional therapeutic options for this cancer, particularly in advanced cases, novel treatments including immunotherapy have been considered. However, despite the encouraging clinical outcomes after implementing these innovative approaches, such as oncolytic viruses (OVs), adoptive cell therapies (ACT), immune checkpoint blockades (ICBs), and cancer vaccines, several factors have restricted their therapeutic effect. The main concern is the existence of an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). Combination of different ICBs or ICBs plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors have shown promising results in overcoming these limiting factors to some extent. Combination of programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) antibody Atezolizumab and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibody Bevacizumab has become the standard of care in the first-line therapy for untestable HCC, approved by regulatory agencies. This paper highlighted a wide overview of the direct and indirect immunotherapeutic strategies proposed for the treatment of HCC patients and the common challenges that have hindered their further clinical applications.     

Determinants of the efficacy of viro-immunotherapy: A review

Oncolytic virus immunotherapy is rapidly gaining interest in the field of immunotherapy against cancer. The minimal toxicity upon treatment and the dual activity of direct oncolysis and immune activation make therapy with oncolytic viruses (OVs) an interesting treatment modality. The safety and efficacy of several OVs have been assessed in clinical trials and, so far, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved one OV. Unfortunately, most treatments with OVs have shown suboptimal responses in clinical trials, while they appeared more promising in preclinical studies, with tumours reducing after immune cell influx. In several clinical trials with OVs, parameters such as virus replication, virus-specific antibodies, systemic immune responses, immune cell influx into tumours and tumour-specific antibodies have been studied as predictors or correlates of therapy efficacy. In this review, these studies are summarized to improve our understanding of the determinants of the efficacy of OV therapies in humans and to provide insights for future developments in the viro-immunotherapy treatment field.     

溶瘤病毒的免疫学机制及临床研究进展

溶瘤病毒（oncolytic virus,OVs）历经百年发展,应用于当前最具潜力的肿瘤免疫疗法。它主要是天然的或基因修饰的DNA病毒和RNA病毒。近年来随着基因工程技术的飞跃发展,经基因改造的溶瘤病毒在肿瘤治疗领域取得很大进展,很多不同类型的病毒（包括单纯疱疹病毒、腺病毒、痘病毒、麻疹病毒和呼肠孤病毒等）正处于临床前研究、临床试验阶段或已批准上市,显示了良好的安全性和临床疗效。普遍认为溶瘤病毒靶向杀伤肿瘤细胞是通过选择性在肿瘤细胞内自我复制,最终裂解肿瘤细胞,同时可激发机体的免疫应答反应,进而增强抗肿瘤免疫效果,靶向杀伤肿瘤细胞而对正常细胞无明显影响。运用基因重组技术将溶瘤病毒与免疫检查点相结合以及肿瘤免疫联合疗法的兴起和不断进步,使溶瘤病毒的应用更加广泛,但仍存在病毒靶向性、安全性、给药途径等瓶颈问题。本文综述了溶瘤病毒的发展史、病毒分类、不同类型溶瘤病毒产品的临床研究进展、溶瘤病毒靶向杀伤肿瘤的免疫学机制及未来发展面临的挑战与展望等。     

Current landscape and perspective of oncolytic viruses and their combination therapies

Oncolytic virotherapy has become an important strategy in cancer immunotherapy. Oncolytic virus (OV) can reshape the tumor microenvironment (TME) through its replication-mediated oncolysis and transgene-produced anticancer effect, inducing an antitumor immune response and creating favorable conditions for the combination of other therapeutic measures. Extensive preclinical and clinical data have suggested that OV-based combination therapy has definite efficacy and promising prospects. Recently, several clinical trials of oncolytic virotherapy combined with immunotherapy have made breakthroughs. This review comprehensively elaborates the OV types and their targeting mechanisms, the selection of anticancer genes armed in OVs, and the therapeutic modes of action and strategies of OVs to provide a theoretical basis for the better design and construction of OVs and the optimization of OV-based therapeutic strategies.     

Oncolytic viruses and histone deacetylase inhibitors—A multi-pronged strategy to target tumor cells

Oncolytic viruses (OVs) have shown promise as cancer therapeutics in pre-clinical and clinical testing; however, it is unlikely that OVs will constitute a stand-alone treatment. Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDIs) represent a class of anticancer agents known to influence epigenetic modifications of chromatin, alter gene expression and manipulate a variety of signaling pathways, in some cases blunting the cellular antiviral response. Recent studies have shown that combining OV therapy with HDI treatment enhances viral replication and synergistically induces the killing of cancer cells in vitro and in vivo, an effect that has now been demonstrated in variety of virus/HDI combinations. This review discusses the results obtained with the different OV/HDI combinations, the rationale supporting these combinations and the advantages for oncolytic virus therapy.     

Targeting Tumor Microenvironment by Small-Molecule Inhibitors

The tumor microenvironment (TME) is a hypoxic, acidic, and immune/inflammatory cell–enriched milieu that plays crucial roles in tumor development, growth, progression, and therapy resistance. Targeting TME is an attractive strategy for the treatment of solid tumors. Conventional cancer chemotherapies are mostly designed to directly kill cancer cells, and the effectiveness is always compromised by their penetration and accessibility to cancer cells. Small-molecule inhibitors, which exhibit good penetration and accessibility, are widely studied, and many of them have been successfully applied in clinics for cancer treatment. As TME is more penetrable and accessible than tumor cells, a lot of efforts have recently been made to generate small-molecule inhibitors that specifically target TME or the components of TME or develop special drug-delivery systems that release the cytotoxic drugs specifically in TME. In this review, we briefly summarize the recent advances of small-molecule inhibitors that target TME for the tumor treatment.     

Aberrant lipid metabolism in hepatocellular carcinoma cells as well as immune microenvironment: A review

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a primary malignancy of the liver with a high worldwide prevalence and poor prognosis. Researches are urgently needed on its molecular pathogenesis and biological characteristics. Metabolic reprogramming for adaptation to the tumour microenvironment (TME) has been recognized as a hallmark of cancer. Dysregulation of lipid metabolism especially fatty acid (FA) metabolism, which involved in the alternations of the expression and activity of lipid‐metabolizing enzymes, is a hotspot in recent study, and it may be involved in HCC development and progression. Meanwhile, immune cells are also known as key players in the HCC microenvironment and show complicated crosstalk with cancer cells. Emerging evidence has shown that the functions of immune cells in TME are closely related to abnormal lipid metabolism. In this review, we summarize the recent findings of lipid metabolic reprogramming in TME and relate these findings to HCC progression. Our understanding of dysregulated lipid metabolism and associated signalling pathways may suggest a novel strategy to treat HCC by reprogramming cell lipid metabolism or modulating TME.     

Impacts and mechanisms of metabolic reprogramming of tumor microenvironment for immunotherapy in gastric cancer

Metabolic disorders and abnormal immune function changes occur in tumor tissues and cells to varying degrees. There is increasing evidence that reprogrammed energy metabolism contributes to the development of tumor suppressive immune microenvironment and influences the course of gastric cancer (GC). Current studies have found that tumor microenvironment (TME) also has important clinicopathological significance in predicting prognosis and therapeutic efficacy. Novel approaches targeting TME therapy, such as immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), metabolic inhibitors and key enzymes of immune metabolism, have been involved in the treatment of GC. However, the interaction between GC cells metabolism and immune metabolism and how to make better use of these immunotherapy methods in the complex TME in GC are still being explored. Here, we discuss how metabolic reprogramming of GC cells and immune cells involved in GC immune responses modulate anti-tumor immune responses, as well as the effects of gastrointestinal flora in TME and GC. It is also proposed how to enhance anti-tumor immune response by understanding the targeted metabolism of these metabolic reprogramming to provide direction for the treatment and prognosis of GC.Subject terms: Cancer, Mechanisms of disease