Allosteric changes in protein structure computed by a simple mechanical model: hemoglobin T<-->R2 transition

Information on protein dynamics has been usually inferred from spectroscopic studies of parts of the proteins, or indirectly from the comparison of the conformations assumed in the presence of different substrates or ligands. While molecular simulations also provide information on protein dynamics, they usually suffer from incomplete sampling of conformational space, and become prohibitively expensive when exploring the collective dynamics of large macromolecular structures. Here, we explore the dynamics of a well-studied allosteric protein, hemoglobin (Hb), to show that a simple mechanical model based on Gaussian fluctuations of residues can efficiently predict the transition between the tense (T, unliganded) and relaxed (R or R2, O(2) or CO-bound) forms of Hb. The passage from T into R2 is shown to be favored by the global mode of motion, which, in turn is driven by entropic effects. The major difference between the dynamics of the T and R2 forms is the loss of the hinge-bending role of alpha(1)-beta(2) (or alpha(2)-beta(1)) interfacial residues at alpha Phe36-His45 and beta Thr87-Asn102 in the R2 form, which implies a decreased cooperativity in the higher affinity (R2) form of Hb, consistent with many experimental studies. The involvement of the proximal histidine beta His92 in this hinge region suggests that the allosteric propagation of the local structural changes (induced upon O(2) binding) into global ones occur via hinge regions. This is the first demonstration that there is an intrinsic tendency of Hb to undergo T-->R2 transition, induced by purely elastic forces of entropic origin that are uniquely defined for the particular contact topology of the T form.     

The deubiquitinases USP33 and USP20 coordinate β2 adrenergic receptor recycling and resensitization

Agonist‐induced ubiquitination of the β₂ adrenergic receptor (β₂AR) functions as an important post‐translational modification to sort internalized receptors to the lysosomes for degradation. We now show that this ubiquitination is reversed by two deubiquitinating enzymes, ubiquitin‐specific proteases (USPs) 20 and 33, thus, inhibiting lysosomal trafficking when concomitantly promoting receptor recycling from the late‐endosomal compartments as well as resensitization of recycled receptors at the cell surface. Dissociation of constitutively bound endogenously expressed USPs 20 and 33 from the β₂AR immediately after agonist stimulation and reassociation on prolonged agonist treatment allows receptors to first become ubiquitinated and then deubiquitinated, thus, providing a ‘trip switch’ between degradative and recycling pathways at the late‐endosomal compartments. Thus, USPs 20 and 33 serve as novel regulators that dictate both post‐endocytic sorting as well as the intensity and extent of β₂AR signalling from the cell surface.     

Delineating the conformational landscape of the adenosine A2A receptor during G protein coupling

1. Download : Download high-res image (171KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

Regulation of CB1 cannabinoid receptor internalization by a promiscuous phosphorylation-dependent mechanism

Agonists stimulate cannabinoid 1 receptor (CB₁R) internalization. Previous work suggests that the extreme carboxy-terminus of the receptor regulates this internalization – likely through the phosphorylation of serines and threonines clustered within this region. While truncation of the carboxy-terminus (V460Z CB₁) and consequent removal of these putative phosphorylation sites prevents endocytosis in AtT20 cells, the residues necessary for CB₁R internalization remain elusive. To determine the structural requirements for internalization, we evaluated endocytosis of carboxy-terminal mutant CB₁Rs stably expressed in HEK293 cells. In contrast to AtT20 cells, V460Z CB₁R expressed in HEK293 cells internalized to the same extent and with similar kinetics as the wild-type receptor. However, mutation of serine and/or threonine residues within the extreme carboxy-terminal attenuated internalization when these receptors were expressed in HEK293 cells. These results establish that the extreme carboxy-terminal phosphorylation sites are not required for internalization of truncated receptors, but are required for internalization of full-length receptors in HEK293 cells. Analysis of β-arrestin-2 recruitment to mutant CB₁R suggests that putative carboxy-terminal phosphorylation sites mediate β-arrestin-2 translocation. This study indicates that the local cellular environment affects the structural determinants of CB₁R internalization. Additionally, phosphorylation likely regulates the internalization of (full-length) CB₁Rs.     

β‐arrestin‐1 mediates the TCR‐triggered re‐routing of distal receptors to the immunological synapse by a PKC‐mediated mechanism

T‐cell receptors (TCR) recognize their antigen ligand at the interface between T cells and antigen‐presenting cells, known as the immunological synapse (IS). The IS provides a means of sustaining the TCR signal which requires the continual supply of new TCRs. These are endocytosed and redirected from distal membrane locations to the IS. In our search for novel cytoplasmic effectors, we have identified β‐arrestin‐1 as a ligand of non‐phosphorylated resting TCRs. Using dominant‐negative and knockdown approaches we demonstrate that β‐arrestin‐1 is required for the internalization and downregulation of non‐engaged bystander TCRs. Furthermore, TCR triggering provokes the β‐arrestin‐1‐mediated downregulation of the G‐protein coupled chemokine receptor CXCR4, but not of other control receptors. We demonstrate that β‐arrestin‐1 recruitment to the TCR, and bystander TCR and CXCR4 downregulation, are mechanistically mediated by the TCR‐triggered PKC‐mediated phosphorylation of β‐arrestin‐1 at Ser163. This mechanism allows the first triggered TCRs to deliver a stop migration signal, and to promote the internalization of distal TCRs and CXCR4 and their translocation to the IS. This receptor crosstalk mechanism is critical to sustain the TCR signal.     

Errata

Abstract

Mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics is an unrivaled tool for studying complex biological systems and diseases in the post-genomic era. In recent years, MS has emerged as a powerful structural biological tool to characterize protein conformation and conformational dynamics. The advantages of MS in structural studies are most evident for membrane proteins such as GPCRs (G protein-coupled receptors), where other well-established structural methods such as X-ray crystallography and NMR remain challenging. For proteins with available high-resolution structures, MS-based structural strategies can provide valuable, previously inaccessible information on protein conformational changes and dynamics, protein motion/flexibility, ligand–protein binding, and protein–protein interfaces. In the past several years, we have developed and adapted a number of MS-based structural approaches, such as CDSiL-MS (Conformational changes and Dynamics using Stable-isotope Labeling and MS), CXMS (Crosslinking/MS) and HDXMS (Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange MS), to study protein structures and conformational dynamics in human β2-adrenegic receptor (β2AR) signaling. In this mini-review, we will highlight several examples demonstrating the power of MS in structural analysis to better elucidate the structural basis of GPCR signaling, particularly through the β-arrestin-mediated GPCR signaling pathway.     

Ligand binding properties of human galanin receptors

Abstract

The galanin receptor family comprises of three members, GalR1, GalR2 and GalR3, all belonging to the G-protein-couple receptor superfamily. All three receptors bind the peptide hormone galanin, but show distinctly different binding properties to other molecules and effects on intracellular signaling. To gain insight on the molecular basis of receptor subtype specificity, we have generated a three-dimensional model for each of the galanin receptors based on its homologs in the same family. We found significant differences in the organization of the binding pockets among the three types of receptors, which might be the key for specific molecular recognition of ligands. Through docking of fragments of the galanin peptide and a number of ligands, we investigated the involvement of transmembrane and loop residues in ligand interaction.